properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil...

46
© Eija Alakangas, VTT Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuels Eija Alakangas, VTT

Upload: phungminh

Post on 06-Feb-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Properties of solid biofuels and comparisonto fossil fuels

Eija Alakangas, VTT

Page 2: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

2

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Energy units

REMEMBER THIS1 toe = 11.63 MWh 1 MWh= 3 600 MJ = 3.6 GJtoe = equivalent oil tonne 1 MW= MJ/s

k kilo 103 T tera 1012

M mega 106 P peta 1015

G giga 109 E eksa 1018

14.18681.1630.1Gcal

0.238810.27780.02388GJ

0.863.610.086MWh

1041.86811.631toe

GcalGJMWhtoe

Page 3: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

3

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Classification of biomass fuels

Page 4: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

4

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Characterisation of solid biofuels – boiler

20

35Net calorific value, MJ/kg

FUEL RANK

PEAT

BARK

MULTIPLE CHALLENGES SOME CHALLENGES NO CHALLENGE0 0,1 0,5 1

WOOD BIOMASSDEMOLITION

WOOD

FIBER RESIDUE

PDFINDUSTRIAL

PDF COMMERCIAL

CHIP-BOARD

POLYOLEFINPLASTICS(PE, PP, PC...)

COLOREDOR PRINTEDPLASTICS,CLEAN

COLORED OR PRINTEDMIXEDPLASTICS

RFPELLETS

PLY-WOOD

5

10

PVC

RDF

MSW

PVC

CONSUMER PDFWOOD AND PLASTICS

CONSUMER PDFMIXED PLASTICS

CONSUMER PDFPAPER AND WOOD

10

BITUMINOUS COALS

BROWN COALS,LIGNITE

STANDARDDESIGN

PETROLEUM COKE

Page 5: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

5

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Characterisation of solid biofuels – C, H, Q

Net calorific value of dry matter

404.0 4.5 90 85

80

75

70

6065

55

C=50 %

H=3.5 %

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5

30

20

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

MJ/kgQ

Volatile matter, %

Ant

raci

te

Cok

e

Bro

wn

coai

Pea

t

Woo

d

Page 6: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

6

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Classification based on raw material

Page 7: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

7

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Classification of wood fuels

Page 8: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

8

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Wood fuel properties and comparison to other fuels

Page 9: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

9

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Chemical properties

Elementary analysis− Carbon (C), hydrogen (H) and nitrogen (N)− Sulphur (S), chlorine (Cl), fluorine (F) and bromium (Br) − Ultimate analysis includes analysis of ash content, moisture,

volatiles and char

Properties like sulphur, chlorine and heavy metals are important to know for environmental reasonsHigh alkali content like potassium (K), sodium (Na) and chlorine (Cl) can cause corrosion and slagging problems in steam boilersMajor and minor elements (mg/kg dry matter)− Major elements; (Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, P, K, Si, Na and Ti)− Minor elements; (As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se,

Sn, V and Zn)

Page 10: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

10

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Composition of wood

Chlorine content (Cl) for virgin wood < 0,05w-% of dry matter.Usually mineral content less than 1w-% of dry matter. Most important are: potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), calcium (Ca), sulphur (S), chlorine (Cl), phosphorus (P), iron (Fe), aluminium (Al) and zinc (Zn).

MoistureDry matter

* proportion in dry matter (d), %

CHAR (C)11,4 - 15,6%*

VOLATILES84 - 88%*

Ash0,4-2,0%*

Carbon Hydrogen (H) 6,0 - 6,2%Oxygen (O) 38 - 42 % Nitrogen (N) 0,1 - 0,4 % Sulphur (S) 0,01

*

* *

-

(C) 49 - 51%*

BARKI 60 %SAW DUST 55 %FRESH WOOD 50 - 60 %

STEM CHIPS 25 - 40 %FIREWOOD 20 25 %

LOGGING RESIDUE 35 - 50 %

-WOOD PELLET 8 - 10 %

Eija Alakangas

Page 11: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

11

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Composition of wood

Lignin includes lot of carbon and hydrogen – energy producingLignin content is higher for coniferous (soft wood) than deciduous (hard wood) trees

WOOD

Energy producing part

Hydrogen

OxygenCarbon

MOISTURE

Nitrogen

Ash

Page 12: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

12

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Properties of wood fuels

0.02 – 0.150.001 – 0.0020.01– 0.030.3 – 0.5<0.055.4 – 6.048 – 52Whole treechips

0.1 – 0.40.075 – 0.0300.01– 0.040.3 – 0.5<0.056.0 – 6.248 – 52Loggingresidue chips

0.02 – 0.150.001 – 0.0020.01– 0.030.3 – 0.5<0.065.4 – 6.048 – 52Stem chips

0.02 – 0.150.001 – 0.0020.01– 0.030.3 – 0.5< 0.056.0 – 6.548 – 52Firewood (oven-readylog)

0.02 – 0.150.001 – 0.0020.01– 0.03< 0.16<0.0076.0 – 6.149 - 50Wood pellet

0.70.25 – 0.50< 0.050.1 – 0.5<0.056.2 – 6.448 – 52Ply wood

0.1 – 0.50.007 – 0.0200.01– 0.050.3 – 0.5<0.056.2 – 6.848 – 52Bark

0.02 – 0.150.001 – 0.0050.01– 0.030.3 – 0.4<0.056.2 – 6.448 – 52Sawdust

KNaClNS H2 CFuel

Properties are stated in value w-% of dry matter

Page 13: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

13

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Comparison of solid biofuels

0.02 – 0.40.001–0.020.01– 0.030.3–0.5<0.055,4-6.848 – 52Wood, general

30(ash)00.1 (ash)0.5–1.50.07-0.17 5.5–6.548 – 50Olive residues

0.70.460.055.548Miscanthuschopped

0.69–1.300.01–0.60.14–0.970.4–0.60.10–0.205.8 – 6.045 - 47Straw pellets

0.69–1.300.01–0.60.14–0.970.4–0.60.10–0.205.8–6.045 - 47Straw

0.4–1.00.002–0.0050.042.00.146.545Energy grain

1.2–2.3< 0.0010.40.7–1.10.06–0.255.6–5.944.6–46.7Reed canarygrass,autumnharvested.

0.3–0.5<0.030.04–0.090.65-1.10.04–0.135.3–5.845–49Reed canary grass, springharvested

KNaClNS H2 CFUEL

Properties are stated in value w-% of dry matter

Page 14: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

14

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Comparison to fossil fuels

KNaClNS H2 CFUEL

0.02 – 0.40.001–0.02

0.01–0.030.3–0.5<0.055,4-6.848 – 52Woodgeneral

---0.01-0.030.113.786.2Light fuel oil

-<0.0004-0.3-0.40.8-0.9510.188.4Heavy fuel oil

0.020.0070.02-0.061.0-3.00.005–0.35.0 – 6.552 – 56Fuel peat

0.0030.0120.100.8 – 1.5< 0.53.5 – 5.068 – 78Coal

Properties are stated in value w-% of dry matter

Page 15: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

15

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Physical and mechanical properties (1)

Moisture (M)−Wood fuels are usually wet except wood pellets or briquettes− Moisture effect into calorific value− Healthy issues (mould, decay, fungi)− Moist fuel is difficult to transport (flow properties)

Ash content (A)− Important for combustion and ash handling− Nordic wood species has low ash content, but southern

European wood species have higher ash content. − Impurities like sand, soil and chemicals include ash content− Problems in large boiler when ash content is more than 3w-

% and in small-scale boilers when ash content is more than 0.5w-%

− Also the ash composition affect to combustion and re-use

Page 16: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

16

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Ash content: Relevance

0 2 4 6 8Ash content (A) in fuel

0

100

200

300

400

500

700

% (d.b.)

mg/Nm3

(13 % O2)

Regression for wood fuels:

y = 13,3 + 22,7 AR² = 0,67 (N = 79) D

ust

emis

sions

Wood chips and pelletsHerbaceous and grain fuels

Influence of the ash content on dust emissions(49 kW wood chip boiler)

Source: Hans Hartman, TZF

Page 17: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

17

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Physical and mechanical properties (2)

Ash melting behaviour− Important for combustion; slagging and fouling− For herbaceous biomass ash melting temperatures are lower

than for woody biomass− Some wood species has lower ash melting temperatures e.g.

eucalyptus, poplarParticle size (P)− Important for handling and combustion− Also geometry of the piece is important (long sticks or

cylindar form− Aim is to produce homogenous particle size distribution− Long sticks and fine particles cause problems

Page 18: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Particle density/bulk density

0 20 40 60 800

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

Specific mass demand

Spec

ific

volu

me

dem

and

Heating oilRapeseed oil

Hard coalEthanol Methanol

Straw-pellets

Deciduous wood chipsConiferous wood chips

Cereals - big square balesCereals - chopped

Straw - big square balesCereals - round bales

Straw - round balesStraw - small square bales

Straw - chopped

Hardwood logsSoftwood logs

Wood-pellets

m³/GJ

kg/GJ

Effects of fuel density

Energy densityTransport and storagevolume demandLogistical planningCombustion properties(specific heat conductivity, rate of gasification)(Hardness of compactedmaterial: Particle density)

Source: Hans Hartman, TZF

Page 19: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

19

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Space requirement for 10 MWh, m3

Needed Storage Volume for 10 MWh [m³]

1,0 1,12,0

8,0

11,0

3,24,2

8,4

11,4 11,512,5

15,0

21,0

16,118,0

21,7

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

Light fue

l oil

Bio-oil

Coal

Sod pe

atMille

d peat

Wood p

ellet

Straw pelle

t

Shredded b

ark, dry

(birch

Loggin

g resid

ue ch

ips, dry

(spru

ce)

Logg

ing re

sidue c

hips,

dry (pi

ne)

Loggin

g res

idue ch

ips, fr

esh (

spruc

e)

Loggin

g res

idues b

undle

, fres

h (sp

ruce)

Shredd

ed bark

, fres

h (pin

e)

Square bi

g stra

w bale,

whea

t & ba

rley

Round

reed

cana

ry gras

s bale

Round s

traw bale

, whe

at & barl

eym³

Page 20: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

20

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Bulk density (BD)−Bulk density is important property for

transportation, conveyors and for fuel feeding − In small plants trade is based on measurement

of bulk density and moisture contentParticle density (DE) informs the mechanical durability of briquettesMechanical durability (DU)− Important property for pellets

Net calorific value (Q)− Informs the energy content of the fuel− In medium and large scale trade is based on

measuring weight, moisture content and net calorific value

Analysis of bulk density at 2 MW heating plant.

Physical and mechanical properties (3)

Page 21: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

21

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Summary of physical/mechanical properties

Durability(of pellets)

Bulk density

Moisture content

Particle density

Size distribution

Bridgingproperties

Calorificvalue (as received) Ash content

Ash softeningbehaviour

Impurities

Interdependency among physical/mechanical properties

Source: Hans Hartman, TZF

Page 22: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

22

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Net calorific value, dry matter, MJ/kg*

05

1015202530354045

CoalHeav

y fuel o

ilLight

fuel

oilMille

d peat

Sod peat

Peat p

ellets

Sawdust

Bark, birc

hBark,

pine

Ply wood, h

og fuel

Wood pellet

Stem w

ood ch

ips

Logging resid

ue chips

Whole tre

e chips

Reed can

ary gras

s, sp

ring

Energy g

rain

Straw, c

hopped

Solid re

cove

red fu

el, SRF

MJ/kg

Page 23: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

23

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Net calorific value as received - calculation

Net calorific value as received (Q)Minimum value to be stated (calculation by taking into account the selected moisture category and the typical variation of the net calorific value of dry matter at constant pressure)

qp,net,ar net calorific value as received, (MJ/kg)qp,net,d net calorific value (constant pressure) dry basis

(MJ/kg)Mar total moisture (w-%)0,02443 is the correction factor of the enthalpy of vaporization (constant

pressure) for water (moisture) at 25 °C [MJ/kg per 1 w-% of moisture]

Calculation formula is available in EN 14961-1

arar

dnet,arnet, MMqq p ×−−

×= 02443,0)100

100(,p,

Calorimetric bomb prEN 14918, Photo: ENAS Oy

Page 24: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

24

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Net calorific value as received, MJ/kgar*

*Typical average moisture content has been used.

05

1015202530354045

Coal

Right fu

el oil

Light

fuel o

ilMille

d pea

tSod

peat

Peat p

ellets

Sawdu

stBark

, birc

h

Bark, c

onife

rous

Ply woo

d, ho

g fue

l

Woo

d pell

et

Stem w

ood c

hips

Logg

ing re

sidue

s chip

s

Who

le tre

e chip

s

Reed c

anary

gras

s, sp

ring

Energy

grain

Straw, c

hopp

ed

Solid r

ecov

ered f

uel, S

RF

MJ/kg

Page 25: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

25

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Net calorific value as received - wood

Net calorificheating value as received MJ/kg

20

15

10

5

20 40 60 80

Moisture content, %

Net calorific heating valueper total mass

Net calorific heating valueper dry mass

Gross calorific heating valueper dry mass

Freshforest chips

Dry forestchips

Wetbark

Page 26: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

26

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Kattilahyötysuhde polttoaineen kosteuspitoisuuden funktiona

88,5

89

89,5

90

90,5

91

91,5

92

92,5

93

93,5

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75Kosteus [%]

Hyö

tysu

hde

[%]

1% efficiency change inboiler efficiency

in 400 MWth boiler

~ 40 GWh more fuel needed

(= 500 000 € in year)

Moisture content at plant - blending

Source: Janne Kärki, VTTMoisture, w-%

Boiler efficiency, %

Page 27: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

27

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Ash content versus net calorific value

0 5 10 15 20 25Ash content in dry matter

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

21

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

21

%

Herbaceous biomass

Wood fuels

042ha010.ppt

Source: TFZ

Net calorific value in dry matter, MJ/kg

Page 28: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

28

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Bark – moisture and energy density

July September October November March April

10 20 30 40 50

Moisture content

Energy density

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

1.1

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

Moisture content, % Energy density MWh/m3 loose

Consecutive number of load measured Source: Risto Impola, VTT

Page 29: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

29

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Moisture content of logging residues

Source: Risto Impola, VTT

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

100

200

300

400

500

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1020

30

40

50

Month / 2001

Moisture %

Waterkg/m3

Moisture content, %Large power plants, average 48.3 %

Small heating plants, average 38.4 %

Large power plants, average 392 kg/m3

Small heating plants, average 262 kg/m3

Page 30: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

30

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Energy density of logging residues chips

Source: Risto Impola, VTT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Month / 2001

Large power plants, average 0.77 kWh/m 3

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9Energy density MWh/m3 loose

Page 31: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

31

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Properties of used wood and comparison to virgin wood

Page 32: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

32

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Used wood versus virgin wood – 1/3

<0,0005 – 0,002< 0,002w-% dry matterFl

<0,01 – 0,050,02 – 0,12w-% dry matterCl

<0,01 – 0,20<0,02 – 0,08w-% dry matterS

<0,1 – 1,10,25 – 1,00w-% dry matterN

5,6 – 7,05,9 – 6,4w-% dry matterH

47 - 5449,1 – 52,3w-% dry matterC

17,1 – 20,618,6 – 18,9MJ/kg dry matterNet calorific value

0,2 – 10,00,7 – 4,0w-% dry matterAsh, A

Virgin woodprEN14961-1

Used woodFinland

UnitProperty

Page 33: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

33

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

500 – 2 000490mg/kg dryFe

200 – 5 000630 – 910mg/kg dryK

100 – 3 000N.A.mg/kg dryMg

9 - 84072 – 115mg/kg dryMn

10 – 2 000200 – 630mg/kg dryNa

50 – 1 30049mg/kg dryP

2 – 20 000N.A.mg/kg drySi

500 – 20 000mg/kg dryCa

10 – 3 000130 – 600mg/kg dryAl

Virgin woodprEN 14961-1

Used woodFinland

UnitProperty

Used wood versus virgin wood – 2/3

Page 34: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

34

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Used wood versus virgin wood – 3/3

5 – 20079 – 300mg/kg dryZn

0,7 – 3,00,5 – 2,2mg/kg dryV

< 0,5 – 50,05,4 – 76,0mg/kg dryPd

< 0,1 – 80,03,2 – 10,0mg/kg dryNi

< 0,02 – 2,0< 0,01 – 2,0mg/kg dryHg

0,5 – 200,05,5 – 80,0mg/kg dryCu

0,2 – 40,05,2 – 60,0mg/kg dryCr

< 0,05 – 5,0*0,12 – 0,50mg/kg dryCd

<0,1 – 6,0< 2 – 34mg/kg dryAs

1 – 50 Ei tietoamg/kg dryTi

Virgin woodprEN 14961

Used wood Finland

UnitProperty

* willow

Page 35: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

35

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Classification of used wood

A – Chemically untreated wood residues and by-productsB – Chemically treated wood residues and by-products− Chemically treated wood do not include heavy metals more than

virgin wood or halogenated compounds as a result of treatment with wood preservatives or coating

Classes A and B no waste incineration directive (WID) to beapplied, properties according to solid biofuel standardEN14961-1

C – Solid recovered fuel− include heavy metals or halogenated compounds as a result of

treatment with wood preservatives or coating− Do not include impregrated wood− Demolition wood, if ”cleaness” can be proved by analysis

For class C waste incineration directive (WID) is applied and solid recoved fuel standard applied (prEN15359).

D – Hazarous waste− Includes impregnated wood

Page 36: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

36

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Chemical and mechanical impurity

Mechanical impurity

Coating, glueing, painting = chemicalimpurity

Chemical impurity can not be removed.

Class A can not include chemical impurity.

Mechanical impurities are separate part of fuel can part of themcan be removed (metal separation) and some more difficultto remove (plastic, construction material: concrete, insulationmaterial).

Page 37: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

37

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Multi-fuel use – possibility to biomass

Forest industry

E. Alakangas

Electricity

Peat

Agrobiomass

Logging residues

Forest chips for energy

GPS

Round wood forraw material

Processheat

Flexible useof different biofuels

Bark andother residues

Forest woodPeat land

CHP plant

Districtheat

Low CO -emissions2

Page 38: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

38

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Influence of properties to large scalecombustion

Alkalis e.g. sodium (Na) and potassium(K) together with chlorine

form alkali chlorines, which stick to heat surfaceshot corrosion, when material temperature is more 450–480oClower steam values when chlorine content is higher than 0.05 p-%

Analysis of reactive K+Na content in dry matterproblems, when K+Na is more than 3 000 mg/kg (0.3 w-%)if ply wood K+Na is higher than 0.5w-%, cofiring with other fuels

Cofiring with sulphur content fuelIf peat or coal is used alkali chlorides react with sulphur oxides from peat and coal combustion and form alkali sulphates or with aluminium silicate form alkali silicates.

Page 39: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

39

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Effect of chlorine-sulphur chemistry to deposit formation in boilers

Source: Martti Aho, VTT

Heat transfersurface

Condensation and fixing

Lack of protecting

compounds

Low ash content

RI

SKY COMPOUNDSALKALICHLORIDES

Cl releases corrosionä

BARK/FOREST RESIDUE

FOREST RESIDUE COAL

Cocombustion

PR

OTECTING REACTIONSALKALISILICATES,

SULPHATES

RISKY COMPOUNS

SULPHUR DIOXIDE, Al-SILICATES

PROTECTIVES

Page 40: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

40

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Effects to combustion - 2

Sodium in ply wood reacts with quartz in fluidisation bed material (sand)

agglomerate with potassium, calcium or manganeseuse of quartz-free bed material

Use of ply wood residues can increase bed temperaturesuse with wet fuelspecial boiler design

High ash content (> 3w-%)with chlorine can cause problems in boiler. Metallic aluminium (folio packages) in demolition wood, wood packages or wood residues from window or door industry

melting of ash in low temperature or stick into cold surfaces

Page 41: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

41

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Deposite formation of boiler tubes

Slagging of bedmaterial

Hot corrosion of boiler tubes

Problems in fluidised bed boilers when using biomass fuels

Increase operation and maintenance costs, decrease of boiler efficiency and effects to lifetime of boiler

Source: Janne Kärki, VTT

Page 42: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

42

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Recommendation for used wood

Combustion technology (e.g. hightemperature, combustion time)Cofiring in boilers > 20 MWth

Recommendations for boilertechnology

< 120 mg/kg dry woodZn

< 10 mg/kg dry woodPb

< 2 000 mg/kg dry wood(< 0.2 w-%)

Metallic aluminium

< 3 000 mg/kg dry wood(0.3 w-%)

Reactive Na+K (SFS-ISO 11885-1:1998 mod)

< 0.1w-% dry matterCl

Page 43: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

43

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Threshold values for used wood –class B

Bark, coniferous< 4 mg/kg dryAr

Bark, coniferous< 1 mg/kg dryCd

Bark, coniferous< 0,1 mg/kg dryHg

Bark, coniferous< 50 mg/kg dryPb

Bark, coniferous< 200 mg/kg dryZn

Bark, coniferous**< 0,1w-% dryCl

Bark, coniferous< 40 mg/kg dryCr

Bark, coniferous< 30 mg/kg dryCu

Virgin wood, in whichvalue is based

Threshold valueProperty

** virgin wood <0.05 w-% of dry matter

Page 44: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

44

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Recommendations for cofiring

If fluidised bed boiler is designed for combustion of peat or/and wood processing residues:− 50% wood can be used of total fuel amount and half of that can be

forest residues

Cofiring of peat or coal− Peat keeps boiler clean

− Peat can secure fuel quality and supply

− Ash from biomass fuel binds sulphur from peat and reduces emissions

Less than 10w-% of reed canary grass can be safely cofired withpeat and other solid biofuels.

Page 45: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

45

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

CO2 –factors

266,6874,1Blend, 70% peat and 20% wood

7,2 (0,76-15,1)2 ( 0,21 – 4,2)Glued or coated wood

61,217,0Demolition wood

114,4831,8Solid recovered fuel

198,055,0Natural gas

266,7674,1Light fuel oil

283,6878,8Heavy fuel oil

340,5694,6Coal

349,297,0Peat pellets

367,2102Sod peat

381,24105,9Milled peat

0 *(394,56)0 *(109,6)Wood

kgCO2/MWhgCO2/MJFUEL

1 gCO2/MJ = 3.6 kgCO2/MWh * CO2 factor for wood is zero in GHG calculations.

Page 46: Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil fuelsp29596.typo3server.info/.../D19_6_EN_Solidbiofuels_properties.pdf · Properties of solid biofuels and comparison to fossil

46

© Eija Alakangas, VTT

Additional information

Alakangas, E. Properties of wood fuels used in Finland, Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT , Project report PRO2/P2030/05 (Project C5SU00800), Jyväskylä 2005, 90 p. + app. 10 p. (www.bio-south.com)

Wiik, C. et al. Used wood in the EU – Part 1Classification, properties and practices, DIV.6 – Part 2. 86 p.(www.bionorm2.eu).Alakangas, E. et. Al. Used wood in the EU – Part 2A catalogue of used wood examples, DIV.6 – Part 3. 86 p.(www.bionorm2.eu). 32 p.

Biodat international database of solid biofuel properties (underpreparation) (www.phydades.info)