proof of evidence of guy wakefield mrtpi for land …

65
PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND NORTH OF VIADUCT, ADJOINING ORCHARD BUSINESS PARK, LEDBURY, HEREFORDSHIRE, HR8 2QY May 2020

Upload: others

Post on 15-May-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY

WAKEFIELD MRTPI

FOR LAND NORTH OF VIADUCT,

ADJOINING ORCHARD BUSINESS

PARK, LEDBURY,

HEREFORDSHIRE, HR8 2QY

May 2020

Page 2: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 1

PROOF OF EVIDENCE FOR LAND NORTH OF VIADUCT, ADJOINING

ORCHARD BUSINESS PARK, LEDBURY, HEREFORDSHIRE, HR8 2QY

Appeal Reference: APP/W1850/W/20/3244410

LPA Reference: 171532

Prepared for Bloor Homes Western

Ashby Road

Measham

Swadlincote

Derbyshire

DE12 7JP

Prepared by Guy Wakefield

Ridge and Partners LLP

Regent House

65 Rodney Road

Cheltenham

GL50 1HX

Tel: 01242 230066

Contact Guy Wakefield

Partner

[email protected]

01242 230066

Version Control

Project 5008267

Issue Date May 2020

Originator GW

Checked EW

Version 1.2

Notes

Page 3: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 2

CONTENTS

1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIANCE 3

2. REPORT STRUCTURE AND BACKGROUND 4

Reasons for Refusal 4

Structure of PoE 4

Other PoE’s 5

3. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA 6

4. THE APPEAL PROPOSALS 7

5. PLANNING POLICY 8

6. CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT PLANNING POLICY 9

The Development Plan 9

Other Material Considerations 19

Public Benefits in respect of Heritage Assets 22

Conformity with the Development Plan 23

The Tilted Balance 23

Conclusions in respect of Planning Policy 24

7. THIRD PARTY COMMENTS 27

Single Point of Access into the development 27

Increase in traffic/ pressure on highways infrastructure 28

Lack of Footpaths and connectivity 29

Provision of Employment Land 29

Impact on Local Facilities 30

Impact on the Listed Viaduct 30

Flooding 31

The Proposed Canal 31

Impact on the setting of the AONB 31

Proposed Housing 32

8. BALANCING EXERCISE/ SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND IMPACTS 33

Summary of Benefits 40

Concluding comments in respect of the balancing exercise 41

9 PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND CONDITIONS 42

10 CONCLUSIONS 43

APPENDIX 1: NOTE ON SUSTAINABILITY

APPENDIX 2: LETTER TO HEREFORDSHIRE COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED CANAL

CONTRIBUTION

APPENDIX 3: OPINION FROM MARTIN KINGSTON QC ON THE PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION

FOR THE CANAL

Page 4: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 3

1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIANCE

1.1. My name is Guy Wakefield and I am presenting this evidence on behalf of Bloor Homes Western

who is the Appellant for this appeal.

1.2. I am a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute and I hold a BA honours degree in Town

Planning. I am a Partner at Ridge and Partners LLP, based at their offices in Cheltenham.

1.3. Prior to working for Ridge and Partners LLP I was a Director at Hunter Page Planning where I started

working in 2000. In 1999, I obtained brief experience within Local Government.

1.4. I have obtained during that time considerable experience in dealing with a wide range of planning

matters relating to a variety of developments, with particular experience in schemes for housing

related development. I undertake, and am responsible for, a wide range of consultancy tasks

including the preparation of site appraisals, the preparation of planning briefs, planning applications

and local plan representations and representing clients at planning appeals and at Local Plan

Examinations.

1.5. Since the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework (hereafter referred to as the

“NPPF” or the “Framework”) I have been involved with a number of applications/appeals involving

housing related development on allocated and non-allocated sites. I am therefore experienced with

the issues applicable to this appeal and am familiar with the issues applicable to this County and to

this proposal in particular.

Declaration

1.6. The evidence which I have prepared and provided in this Planning Proof of Evidence is true and is

given in accordance with the guidance of the Royal Town Planning Institute. The opinions expressed

are my true and professional opinions.

1.7. I have visited the appeal site and surrounding locality.

Page 5: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 4

2. REPORT STRUCTURE AND BACKGROUND

2.1 This Proof of Evidence (PoE) has been prepared on behalf of Bloor Homes Western in respect of the

Public Inquiry involving Land North of the Viaduct, Adjoining Orchard Business Park, Ledbury,

Herefordshire that is due to commence on a date to be confirmed by the Planning Inspectorate.

2.2 The application (reference: 171532) was refused by the Planning Committee (despite a

recommendation for approval) with the decision issued on 12th December 2019. Three reasons for

refusal are set out in the Decision Notice (CD13.1).

Reasons for Refusal

2.3 This PoE will specifically look at the principle of development and relevant planning policy, third-party

comments, before turning to look at the planning balance.

Structure of PoE

2.4 My evidence will focus on the principle of development and relevant planning policy, before

assessing whether the appeal proposals represent sustainable development with regards to Section

38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, and paragraph 11 of the NPPF.

2.5 This PoE is split into the following sections:

• Section 3 will describe the site and surrounding area, together with the relevant planning

history.

• Section 4 considers the appeal proposals.

• Section 5 considers relevant planning policy.

• Section 6 considers the principle of development on the site.

• Section 7 addresses the third-party comments raised as part of the planning application and

received as part of the appeal process.

• Section 8 carries out the balancing exercise together with a summary of benefits and impacts.

• Section 9 looks at the planning obligations and conditions.

• Section 10 provides conclusions.

2.6 My evidence is informed by the key findings and opinions expressed within the other PoE’s

supporting the appellant’s case.

Page 6: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 5

Other PoE’s

2.7 This PoE should be read in conjunction with the following Proofs:

• Highways prepared by Nigel Millington of Phil Jones Associates

• Landscape and Visual Matters prepared by Tim Jackson of FPCR

• Housing Land Supply prepared by Ben Pycroft of Emery Planning

• Affordable Housing prepared by James Stacey of Tetlow King Planning

• Heritage prepared by Robert Sutton of Cotswold Archaeology

2.8 Furthermore, the proofs should be read in conjunction with the Core Documents, Signed Statements

of Common Ground and Section 106 Agreement.

Page 7: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 6

3. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA

3.1. The Planning SoCG signed with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1) at section 2 provides details on the

following in respect of the site and surrounding area:

• Site Description and Location

• Planning History

3.2. As such, reference should be made to the SoCG in respect of the above.

Page 8: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 7

4. THE APPEAL PROPOSALS

4.1. A detailed description of the appeal proposals is set out within Section 1 of the Officers’ Committee

Report (CD12.4).

4.2. As such, reference should be made to the Officers’ Committee Report in respect of this.

Page 9: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 8

5. PLANNING POLICY

5.1. The SoCG signed with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1) at Section 4 provides a list of the relevant

policies for the determination of this appeal.

5.2. Section 5 of the SoCG with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1), sets out points of agreement. In respect

of planning policy this can be summarised as follows:

• The proposal complies with the Development Plan, which comprises the Herefordshire

Local Plan Core Strategy 2011-2031 and the Ledbury Neighbourhood Development Plan.

• The LPA is unable to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, although the exact position

is not agreed.

• As the LPA is unable to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, paragraph 11d of the

NPPF is engaged in respect of the assessment of the housing elements of this proposal.

Therefore, in the event that the proposal is found not to comply with the Development Plan

(in the context of paragraph 11c) of the Framework, or when reading the Development Plan

as a whole), the ‘tilted balance’ applies in this case.

• The principle of development is therefore acceptable subject to other technical matters. This

is set out in more detail within Section 6 of this proof.

5.3 With respect to the SoCG with Ledbury Town Council (CD4.3), section 4 sets out the points of

agreement. In relation to planning policy this can be summarised as follows:

• The site is allocated the Herefordshire Core Strategy as a planned Strategic Urban Extension

to deliver a significant amount of housing and employment land to serve Ledbury’s needs

during the Plan period.

• The principle of development is supported, subject to the provision of satisfactory access

arrangements.

• It is agreed that Herefordshire Council cannot demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply.

• There are no objections in relation to the following technical matters: Arboriculture,

Biodiversity, Flood Risk and Drainage, Noise, Air Quality, Minerals and Waste, and

Contaminated Land.

Page 10: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 9

6. CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT PLANNING POLICY

6.1. The starting point for decision taking is Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act

2004 which sets out that applications for planning permission must be determined in accordance

with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

6.2. This section considers the policies upon which the application was refused. It focusses specifically

on the principle of development and the proposals conformity with the Development Plan. As has

been set out at Section 2.7 of this Proof, separate Proofs of Evidence have been prepared in relation

to Highways, Landscape, 5- year Housing Land Supply, Affordable Housing and Heritage related

matters.

The Development Plan

6.3. The Development Plan for the Appeal Site comprises the Herefordshire Local Plan Core Strategy

and the Ledbury Neighbourhood Plan. This section considers firstly, the allocation within the Core

Strategy before considering wider policies within the Core Strategy and Neighbourhood Plan which

the Council considered the proposals conflicted with in its reasons for refusal. It has been a

longstanding intention of the Core Strategy to allocate the site for the proposed development.

6.4. The appeal site is allocated for development by policy LB2 of the Herefordshire Core Strategy

(CD1.3). The appeal proposal will now be examined against each of the requirements within the

policy.

Policy LB2 states:

Development proposals north of the viaduct in Ledbury will be expected to bring forward the

following to achieve a sustainable mixed use urban extension of the town:

• Mixed use development of around 625 new homes, at an average density of around 40

dwellings per hectare, comprising a mix of market and affordable house sizes and types

that meet the requirements of Policy H3 and the needs identified in the latest version of the

Herefordshire Local Housing Market Assessment;

6.4 The description of development clearly states that the site should deliver ‘around 625 dwellings’.

The proposal for ‘up to 625 dwellings’ is clearly consistent with the reference to ‘around 625

dwellings’. Furthermore, it is demonstrated on drawing 9602 Rev F (CD8.12) that the development

can provide this number of dwellings at an average density of 40dph.

6.5 As the application is submitted in outline, the final mix has not been agreed. However, in order to

ensure a mix of dwellings on the site, the appellant and LPA have agreed a draft list of conditions

(CD5.3) which includes a condition ensuring a suitable mix of new homes are provided on the site.

Page 11: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 10

The affordable housing provision of 40% will be secured by way of a Section 106 Agreement

(CD6.1).

• Around 3 hectares of employment land, restricted to Use Class B1;

6.6 As is demonstrated on drawing 9600 Rev G (CD8.10), the proposal would provide 2.9 hectares of

employment land in line with policy LB2 of the Core Strategy. It is proposed to add a condition

restricting the land use to B1.

• A target of 40% of the total number of dwellings to be affordable housing;

6.7 The proposals provide 40% affordable housing to be secured by legal agreement. This is clearly set

out within the draft Section 106 Agreement (CD6.1).

• Land and contributions to facilitate a restored canal to be delivered in partnership with the

Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal Trust;

6.8 As is shown on drawings 9603 Rev E (CD8.13) and 9701 Rev L (CD8.15) land is proposed for the

canal. Furthermore, it is proposed as part of the Section 106 Agreement to make a contribution to

facilitate a restored canal. As is clearly set out at paragraph 6.152 of the Officers Committee Report

(CD12.4), the requirement of the policy is to facilitate (or to assist) the canal, it does not require the

Appellant to pay for the entire cost of providing the canal. The S106 Agreement provides land and

contribution in line with requirements of policy LB2.

6.9 During the course of the application, the appellant put forward two different contributions. The first

was for circa £280,734 and the second was for £1 million. The justification for these contributions

is set out in more detail below and the S106 Agreement has been drafted to allow the Inspector to

determine which contribution is appropriate having regard to compliance with the CIL Regulations.

First Contribution

6.10 The first contribution was set out in a letter from the Appellant to the Case Officer dated 14th July

2017 (Appendix 2). This proposed a contribution of £280,734. As is set out in the letter this figure

was calculated by “reference to the cost of a reasonable, proportionate programme of works that

would contribute towards the construction of the restored canal along an identified corridor of land

to be provided by Bloor Homes. The sum offered is the cost of excavating a 10m wide linear

depression along the general alignment of the canal within the canal corridor which is 1m deep at

its deepest point with sides graded to 1:3 and to remove the soil/spoil off site.”

6.11 The opinion from Martin Kingston QC (Appendix 3) is very clear that policy LB2 requires contributions

in addition to the safeguarding of land (paragraph 17), but equally this contribution is to ‘facilitate’

rather than ‘deliver’ a restored canal. He further sets out at paragraph 19 that “I agree that calculating

the contribution by reference to the cost of undertaking the works to excavate a linear depression

(say 1m deep) along an agreed section of the canal corridor within the site and removing the soil/spoil

Page 12: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 11

off site would appear to meet the test of being fairly and reasonably related to the development, so

long as that level of contribution would not threaten the viability of the development once the

provision of the corridor of land was also taken into account.”

Second Contribution

6.12 The second contribution was made by the Appellant nearer to the determination of the application

within a letter dated 5th September 2019 (CD8.8). This proposed a financial contribution of £1million,

with the increase being offered in order to overcome the final area of objection and move towards

a recommendation for approval from Officers. The letter from the appellant, was very clear that this

was subject to the Council confirming that the contributions complied with Regulation 122 of the

Community Infrastructure Regulations 2010.

6.13 Within the Officers’ report to committee (CD12.4), at 6.156 it was confirmed that “The contribution

detailed above is considered to be a satisfactory contribution with respect of facilitating delivery of

the canal and will be secured in the S106 Agreement. The support of the Herefordshire and

Gloucestershire Canal Trust to both the contributions and indicative canal route as detailed on the

illustrative masterplan is noted”.

6.14 It is clearly set out in the Officers committee report at 6.152 that “policy LB2 does not require the

developer to pay for the whole cost of providing the canal. While the Council may as a matter of

planning judgement seek a full contribution, such an approach may need careful consideration with

reference with reference to regulation 122(2)(c) of the CIL Regulations, since such a level of

contribution would be difficult to justify as being fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the

development”.

6.15 Within their response dated 1st November 2019 (CD9.33), the Canal Trust set out that “we consider

the sum offered by Bloor would facilitate the potential for a restored canal. For the avoidance of

doubt the sum offered would provide 40-50% of the total cost of restoration of the proposed section

of canal depending on the amount of volunteer labour utilised”.

6.16 My view is that the first contribution satisfies the objective of the policy to facilitate the restoration

of the canal for the reasons given by Martin Kingston QC in his advice attached at Appendix 3, as

summarised above.

• A new linear informal park to link to the existing town trail, riverside walk, recreational open

space and existing allotments;

6.17 As the appeal proposals are in outline, this will be the subject of a reserved matters application.

However, the illustrative masterplan drawing 9701 Rev L (CD8.15) demonstrates that a path to the

existing town trail can be achieved through Ballard Close and via the Hereford Road and sufficient

space is provided on site for recreational open space. The off-site highway works are shown on

drawings 03468-A-016-P4; 03468-A-015-P1; and 03468-A-010-P5 (CD4.43, 8.44, 8.45).

Page 13: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 12

• The provision of developer contributions towards any identified need for new/improved

community facilities/infrastructure improvements. This shall include a new 210 place

primary school within the development (or an expansion of the existing primary school) and

new recreational open space, play, indoor and outdoor sport facilities;

6.18 These requirements will be secured through the Section 106 Agreement (CD6.1). As is set out in

6.186 of the Officers Committee Report (CD12.4), contributions will be sought for

i. Education - Ledbury Primary School and John Masefield Secondary School

ii. Transport - Schemes, where necessary, those identified in the Ledbury Transport Study

iii. Outdoor Sports - for outdoor sports facilities as identified in the Council’s Playing Pitch

Assessment 2012 and Outdoor Sports Investment Plan 2019

iv. Primary Care – for the provision of additional accommodation for primary medical care

facilities in Ledbury

v. Hospital – for the provision of hospital facilities in Hereford

vi. Public Open Space

• Provision of satisfactory vehicular access arrangements, the details of which will be

determined at planning application stage

6.19 The matter of access has been considered in full as part of the proposals. As set out in the signed

Highways SoCG with Herefordshire Council (CD4.2), it is confirmed that there are no matters of

disagreement between the Appellant and LPA in respect of this matter.

6.20 Furthermore, it was confirmed in the Officer’s Committee Update Report (CD12.3) at 2.2 that it has

“been demonstrated that a satisfactory access strategy for all modes can be provided utilising a

singular vehicular access from the Bromyard Road. The proposals therefore meet the objectives of

Policy SS4, MT1 and LB2 to an appropriate level. Furthermore, the requirements of NPPF paragraphs

108 – 111 are also satisfied. The highways network can accommodate the development without an

unacceptable impact on highway safety and the impact on the road network is not severe”.

6.21 In terms of vehicular access into the site, by way of background paragraph 100 of the Inspector’s

Report into the Core Strategy (2015) (CD1.5) states:

“… For Ledbury SUE/UEA, the submission plan policy LD2 tied down the primary and

secondary vehicular access to two specific roads. This was too prescriptive given the early

transport studies for the site. MM025 deletes the primary and secondary references and I am

satisfied that this would make the policy sound in that it would be more flexible and effective.

Further minor changes to the wording of the policy in terms of access suggested by the

Page 14: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 13

Council following responses to the main modifications would not be necessary for soundness

and it would be up to the Council to impose them if they wish.”

6.22 The Local Plan Inspector therefore deliberately left it open for a future applicant to propose an access

solution which is safe and where the impacts on the road network are not severe. Mr Millington

sets out in his proof of evidence that the proposal satisfies this objective.

6.23 The proposed highway improvements will be secured as part of the Section 106 Agreement (CD6.1)

and planning conditions.

6.24 It is acknowledged that Ledbury Town Council have subsequently been awarded Rule 6 Status as

part of the appeal. Their Statement of Case (CD5.4) suggests that the proposed access into the site

is not satisfactory. This matter has been discussed by Mr Millington within his proof, where it is

demonstrated that the proposed access arrangements are satisfactory.

• Appropriate mitigation to safeguard the amenity of future occupants from unacceptable

levels of noise and to safeguard the continued operation of existing businesses adjoining

the area;

6.25 As is set out in the Officers committee report (CD12.4) at 6.147 Officers recommend a condition be

attached so that any reserved matters applications are accompanied by a noise/ acoustic

assessment. Within the agreed draft list of the conditions (CD4.7), appropriate conditions are

proposed in relation to noise.

• Development of bespoke, high quality and inclusive design, including accommodation that

will meet the needs of older persons and that contributes to the distinctiveness of this part

of Ledbury and respects the setting and significance of the listed viaduct and the Malvern

Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty;

6.26 The first part of this criteria will be delivered through reserved matters applications.

6.27 It is acknowledged within the SoCG with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1) at Section 5, that it has been

agreed between parties that the appeal proposals would result in less than substantial harm to the

Grade II Listed Viaduct; however, this is at the lower end of that scale, with significant landscape

mitigation further minimising the harm. In accordance with paragraph 196 of the NPPF, this harm

should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal. The public benefits are set out in

more detail later within this section of the Proof. The SoCG concludes that the public benefits of the

proposal do significantly outweigh the less than substantial harm which exists.

6.28 Within the SoCG on Heritage Matters prepared with Ledbury Town Council (CD4.4), it is equally

agreed within Section 4 that the “proposed development will have no material impact on the

significance of any designated heritage assets apart from the Conservation Area”. It is further

Page 15: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 14

demonstrated within the proof of Mr Sutton that the proposals will not have an adverse impact on

any designated Heritage Assets.

6.29 In respect of the AONB, the Green Infrastructure Plan (Drawing 9603 Rev F (CD8.13)) shows a

landscape buffer on the eastern and southern boundaries of the site together with public open space

on the western boundary which bounds open fields, thereby demonstrating that an appropriate

buffer can be provided within the site. Policy BE2.1 of the Ledbury Neighbourhood Plan covers edge

of town transition. All reserved matters applications will be required to meet the requirements of

this policy.

6.30 The SoCG with the Town Council on Landscape and Visual Matters (CD4.6) raises concerns with

regards to the increased vehicular use resulting from the proposed development and its impact on

the AONB. This matter is dealt with in the proof of Mr Jackson whereby it is concluded that in

landscape and visual terms, the limited and localised traffic increases will result in no more than very

limited and localised effects upon the tranquillity and enjoyment of the AONB.

• Safeguards to ensure there is no adverse impact on water quality and quantity in the River

Leadon;

6.31 This will be assessed during the reserved matters phase, however there are a number of conditions

proposed (CD4.7) which would put safeguards in place during the construction phase to

demonstrate that there would be no adverse impact on the River Leadon including those in relation

to drainage, contamination, and distance of development from the river.

• New walking, cycling and bus links from the urban extension directly to the town trail and

riverside walk under the viaduct, the railway station and town centre to create linkages to

nearby development and existing community facilities;

6.32 Within the appeal site, a number of improvements to pedestrian links are proposed. These include

the provision of a footway/ cycleway to tie in with the existing footway infrastructure at the 5-arm

roundabout to the south of the site, a proposed footway/ cycleway connection at the south-east

boundary of the site and Ballard Close together with improvements to the town trail. These

improvements will be secured by conditions (CD4.7). Off-site highway works are shown on drawings

03468-A-016-P4; 03468-A-015-P1; 03468-A-019-P1 and 03468-A-010-P5 (CD8.44, 8.43, 8.41, 8.45)

6.33 The Statement of Case (CD5.4) from Ledbury Town Council does not raise any concerns in relation

to the proposed linkages to nearby development and existing community facilities.

• Sustainable standards of design and construction; and

6.34 A note setting out the sustainability credentials of the proposal is attached at Appendix 1 and which

sets out:

Page 16: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 15

“Bloor’s’ priority is always to use a ‘fabric first’ approach in order to reduce CO2 demand by

being lean, clean and green. The fabric-first approach as controlled by Building Regulations

reduces the call on energy demand in the first place; thereby helping to reduce overall energy

generation requirements and reducing running costs and bills.”

• A comprehensive sustainable urban drainage system which includes measures such as rain

gardens and swales to manage ground and surface water drainage and safeguard against

any increased flood risk.

6.35 This will be demonstrated through the submission of reserved matters applications. However as is

set out in the Officers’ Committee Report (CD12.4), it has been demonstrated that subject to

conditions, the management of surface water drainage can be satisfactorily accommodated on site.

Furthermore, as is set out in the Committee Report at 6.157-6.170 no objection to the proposals

have been raised by Statutory Consultees in respect of this matter. It is acknowledged that in both

the SoCG with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1) and Ledbury Town Council (CD4.3) there are no

objections and these matters are agreed.

Summary

6.36 Given the above the proposal is consistent with Policy LB2.

6.25 Other relevant polices from the Local Plan are summarised below.

Policy SS1

6.37 Policy SS1 sets out the presumption in favour of sustainable development in line with national policy.

Policies SS4 and MT1

6.38 Policy SS4 covers movement and transportation and seeks to ensure that new development

minimises impacts on the transport network. Furthermore, where practicable, development

proposals should be accessible by and facilitate a genuine choice of modes of travel including

walking, cycling and public transport.

6.39 Policy MT1 covers traffic management, highway safety and promoting active travel. This policy sets

out a number of principles that new development should follow.

6.40 Both policies form a key part of RfR1 and this is a matter which the Town Council contest.

6.41 It is demonstrated within the Proof of Mr Millington that the proposed development would provide

satisfactory vehicle arrangements and would not prejudice highway safety. It is not intended to

repeat the conclusions of the Mr Millington’s Proof here. Indeed, during the assessment of the

application and within the Officers Update Report to committee (CD12.3), the position of the

Highways Authority was clearly set out (paragraphs 2.1-2.4):

Page 17: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 16

“The position of Officers and the Highways Authority The position of Officers and the Highways Authority is clear and is unchanged from the position set out in the Committee Report attached as Annex 1 to this update and as further discussed in Annex 2, the associated Committee update sheet. There is no policy requirement for there to be more than one vehicular access to the site or for the access or any vehicular access to link to the Hereford Road roundabout under the viaduct.

It has been demonstrated that a satisfactory access strategy for all modes can be provided utilising a singular vehicular access from the Bromyard Road. The proposals therefore meet the objectives of Policy SS4, MT1 and LB2 to an appropriate level. Furthermore, the requirements of NPPF paragraphs 108 – 111 are also satisfied. The highways network can accommodate the development without an unacceptable impact on highway safety and the impact on the road network is not severe.

With the proposed appropriate mitigation measures, it has been demonstrated that the local highway network can absorb the traffic impacts of the development without adversely affecting the safe and efficient flow of traffic on the network and that traffic impacts can be managed to acceptable levels to reduce and mitigate any adverse impact from the development.

The submission demonstrates that the proposed development can be made sustainable through the provision of improved public transport or walking and cycling infrastructure of a level commensurate with the level of development proposed. It therefore satisfies Policy SS4 of the core strategy and helps deliver on the aims of policy SS7 and wider climate change objectives.”

6.42 As such, and as is demonstrated in the proof of Mr Millington, the signed Highways SoCG (CD4.2)

and as the Council’s own Highways Officers set out, the appeal proposals accord with policies SS4

and MT1.

Policy LD1

6.43 Policy LD1 covers landscape and townscape. This policy sets out that proposals should demonstrate

that character of the landscape and townscape has positively influenced the design, scale, nature

and site selection, protection and enhancement of the setting of settlements and designated area.

conserve and enhance the natural and scenic beauty of important landscapes and features including

AONB’s; through the protection of the area’s character and by enabling appropriate uses, design

and management. Incorporate new landscape schemes and their management to ensure

development integrates appropriately into its surroundings.

6.44 RfR2, relates to concerns over the increased traffic and subsequent impact on the Malvern Hills

AONB. It has been demonstrated within the proof of Mr Jackson that the proposed development

would not have an adverse impact on the AONB and furthermore within the SoCG, it has been

agreed that “the increase in vehicular traffic and associated disturbance will not result in an

unacceptable impact on the AONB”. As such and as agreed within the SoCG, the proposal in respect

of the AONB is in accordance with this policy.

6.45 It is acknowledged that the appeal proposals are submitted in outline only with all matters reserved

(except access) and as such all matters relating to design and scale will be submitted as part of a

reserved matters application. As is set out in the proof of Mr Jackson, at 8.17 “The careful design

Page 18: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 17

approach adopted will ensure that a positive development solution is delivered which responds to

the character and features of the site landscape and its wider context. This includes in relation to

the Malvern Hills AONB. The proposals will assimilate appropriately and positively into the

settlement edge of Ledbury and will conserve and extend tree cover as advocated”. It has been

demonstrated within the illustrative masterplan that the quantum of development can be

accommodated on the site, and as such for the purposes of this appeal, the proposals are considered

to accord with policy LD1.

Policy LD4

6.46 Policy LD4 covers the historic environment and heritage assets. This policy sets out that

development proposals affecting heritage assets should protect, conserve and where possible

enhance heritage assets and their settings in a manner appropriate to their significance through

appropriate management, uses and sympathetic design, in particular emphasising the original form

and function where possible.

6.47 RfR3 specifically relates to the impact of increased vehicular traffic through the heart of the Ledbury

Town Centre Conservation Area. Matters relating to Heritage are set out in the Proof of Mr Sutton,

however it is prudent to set out here that it is agreed within the SoCG with the LPA (CD4.1) at

Section 5 that “It is agreed that any increases to traffic flows through Conservation Area (namely

along The Homend and the Southend) would have no effect on its character and appearance.

Therefore, the scheme would not conflict with Local Plan LD4 or SS6, nor conflict with the provisions

with the NPPF or section 72 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation Area) Act 1990.”

6.48 It is however acknowledged that within the SocG with Ledbury Town Council (CD4.4), that the

following matter remains in dispute “whether an increase in traffic flow along ‘The Homend’ (A438),

High Street and ‘The Southend’ (A449) through Ledbury Town Centre Conservation Area would

harm the appearance and / or character of the Conservation Area.” It should further be

acknowledged that within the SoCG with the Town Council, the only designated heritage asset that

the proposal is considered to have an impact on is the Conservation Area.

6.49 Section 72 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation Area) Act 1990, states ‘special attention

shall be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of that area’.

Mr Sutton’s evidence finds that “although the Appeal Scheme would result in increased traffic flows

along routes within Ledbury Conservation Area, this would not be sufficient to alter the character or

appearance of the area; hence the special interest of the area would be preserved.” In the same

sense it can be said that the proposals will not be in conflict with LD4.

6.50 Where it is agreed in the SoCG with the LPA (CD4.1) that there is some harm to the Grade II Listed

Viaduct this is considered to be less than substantial, at the lower end of the spectrum, and the

public benefits significantly outweighs the less than substantial harm for the purpose of paragraph

196 of the NPPF. In the context of section 69 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation Area)

Page 19: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 18

Act 1990 the heritage harm is outweighed by the heritage benefits such that the proposal is

consistent with the Act or in the words of Mr Sutton re the legislative test within the Act “… this

equates to ‘preserving its special architectural and historic interest’...”.

6.51 Still with regard to the Viaduct, there is no conflict with Policy LD4 as the heritage benefits (improved

access and improved views) outweigh the very slight harm (the change to one view), thus the

proposal ‘protects, conserves and enhances the heritage asset’ (the first component of the policy).

Specifically, the fifth component of the policy identifies the opportunity for proposals to

‘improve….public access to the heritage asset’ which will also be achieved.

6.52 If an alternative interpretation of policy LD4 is adopted, one that does not allow the heritage benefits

to weighed against the harm, then the only conclusion one could reach is that the policy is out-of-

date and in conflict with the NPPF; and the provisions of the Framework (paragraph 196) need to be

given primacy (i.e. the balance is brought to bear, as per the paragraphs above).

Policy SS6

6.53 Policy SS6 covers environmental quality and local distinctiveness. This sets out that development

proposals should conserve and enhance those environmental assets that contribute towards the

county’s ‘distinctiveness’, in particular its settlement pattern, landscape, biodiversity and heritage

assets and especially those with specific environmental designations. Policy SS6 is referenced in

RfR2 and RfR3 in relation to the AONB and Ledbury Conservation Area respectively.

6.54 It is also agreed in the SoCG with the LPA (CD4.1) that the proposals would not have an unacceptable

impact on the AONB or the Ledbury Town Centre Conservation Area. Within the SoCG with Ledbury

Town Council in respect of Landscape and Visual Matters (CD4.6) and Heritage matters (CD4.4) it

remains a matter of disagreement as to the impact of the proposals on the AONB and its settling,

together with the Ledbury Conservation Area. However, it should be acknowledged that the

concerns relate to the potential increase in vehicular movements rather than the physical built form

of the development.

6.55 As such the appellant concludes, the appeal proposals accord with policy SS6. This is demonstrated

within the proof of Mr Jackson and Mr Sutton.

Ledbury Neighbourhood Plan

6.56 There are no policies from the Ledbury Neighbourhood Plan referenced within the Reasons for

Refusal. Having reviewed this Plan, I have not been able to find any conflict with this plan. Indeed,

the Neighbourhood Plan acknowledges the site’s allocation in the Core Strategy.

6.57 Whilst it is acknowledged that the Neighbourhood Plan states that the Town Council and the

community opposed the allocation, the Neighbourhood Plan did not seek to revisit the allocation or

provide additional requirements or criteria for the developer to meet on the site i.e. there are no

Page 20: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 19

policies that specifically address the site. the Neighbourhood Plan had the opportunity to express a

preference for highway access under the viaduct but chose not to say anything.

Other Material Considerations

6.58 This section now turns to look at other material considerations relevant to the proposals.

National Planning Policy Framework

6.59 The National Planning Policy Framework was revised and updated in February 2019.

6.60 The NPPF does not affect the primacy of the Development Plan (paragraph 12) however it must be

a material consideration for planning decisions (paragraph 2).

6.61 Paragraph 11 is an important consideration when making a planning decision. It explains that that

there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development which for decision taking means:

c) “approving development proposals that accord with an up-to-date development plan

without delay; or

d) where there are no relevant development plan policies, or the policies which are most

important for determining the application are out-of-date, granting permission unless:

i. the application of policies in this Framework that protect areas or assets of

particular importance provides a clear reason for refusing the development

proposed; or

ii. any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh

the benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a

whole.”

6.62 From hereon, and as is customary, I shall refer to the paragraph 11(d) i. as Limb 1 and paragraph

11(d) ii. as Limb 2.

6.63 Paragraph 14 sets out the weight to be afforded to Neighbourhood Plans where paragraph 11(d)

applies. It explains that:

“In situations where the presumption (at paragraph 11d) applies to applications involving the

provision of housing, the adverse impact of allowing development that conflicts with the

neighbourhood plan is likely to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, provided all

of the following apply:

a) the neighbourhood plan became part of the development plan two years or less before the

date on which the decision is made;

b) the neighbourhood plan contains policies and allocations to meet its identified housing

requirement;

Page 21: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 20

c) the local planning authority has at least a three-year supply of deliverable housing sites

(against its five-year housing supply requirement, including the appropriate buffer as set out

in paragraph 73); and

d) the local planning authority’s housing delivery was at least 45% of that required over the

previous three years.”

6.64 In the case of the appeal proposals, first I do not consider there to be any conflict with the Plan. And

secondly whilst Ledbury has a recently adopted Neighbourhood Plan (i.e. it is less than two years

old), it does not allocate any housing sites for development. For either of these reasons should it be

concluded that the proposals do not accord with the Development Plan when read as a whole, then

the tilted planning balance should apply to the determination of the appeal.

6.65 Paragraph 73 of the NPPF concerns maintaining supply and delivery of homes. It explains that:

“Strategic policies should include a trajectory illustrating the expected rate of housing delivery over the plan period, and all plans should consider whether it is appropriate to set out the anticipated rate of development for specific sites. Local planning authorities should identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide a minimum of five years’ worth of housing against their housing requirement set out in adopted strategic policies, or against their local housing need where the strategic policies are more than five years old. The supply of specific deliverable sites should in addition include a buffer (moved forward from later in the plan period) of:

a) 5% to ensure choice and competition in the market for land; or

b) 10% where the local planning authority wishes to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable sites through an annual position statement or recently adopted plan, to account for any fluctuations in the market during that year; or

c) 20% where there has been significant under delivery of housing over the previous three years, to improve the prospect of achieving the planned supply.”

6.66 Paragraph 74 explains how an authority can demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing

sites. It explains that:

“A five-year supply of deliverable housing sites, with the appropriate buffer, can be demonstrated where it has been established in a recently adopted plan, or in a subsequent annual position statement which:

a) has been produced through engagement with developers and others who have an impact on delivery, and been considered by the Secretary of State; and

b) incorporates the recommendation of the Secretary of State, where the position on specific sites could not be agreed during the engagement process.

6.67 Footnote 38 explains that, “for the purposes of paragraphs 73b and 74 a plan adopted between 1

May and 31 October will be considered ‘recently adopted’ until 31 October of the following year;

and a plan adopted between 1 November and 30 April will be considered recently adopted until 31

October in the same year”.

Page 22: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 21

6.68 Paragraph 75 explains that “to maintain the supply of housing, local planning authorities should

monitor progress in building out sites which have permission. Where the Housing Delivery Test

indicates that delivery has fallen below 95% of the local planning authority’s housing requirement

over the previous three years, the authority should prepare an action plan in line with national

planning guidance, to assess the causes of under delivery and identify actions to increase delivery

in future years”. In the case of Herefordshire, an Action Plan was produced in August 2019.

6.69 All other relevant chapters of the NPPF are agreed in the SoCG and are discussed as appropriate

throughout my proof.

Planning Practice Guidance

6.70 The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) was first published on 6th March 2014. It expands on and

provides additional guidance for policies in the NPPF. Where relevant this is discussed throughout

the proof.

Malvern Hills AONB Management Plan

6.71 The Malvern Hills AONB Management Plan covers the period from 2019-2024. One objective and

one policy are referenced in RfR2. These are TR01, whose objective is to “reduce the impact of the

motor vehicle whilst promoting a more sustainable approach to accessibility management”,

following on from this objective is policy TRP6 which seeks to “ensure that new developments on

the periphery of the AONB do not give rise to significant traffic increases and associated effects on

tranquillity and enjoyment. Seek compensation for such effects where relevant.” It has

subsequently been agreed within the SoCG with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1) that the increase in

vehicular traffic and associated disturbance will not result in unacceptable impact on the AONB.

Furthermore, a Travel Plan is to be prepared which will seek to reduce vehicle trips as much as

reasonably possible.

6.72 The SoCG between the Town Council and Appellant (CD4.6) sets out that this matter is still in

dispute in respect of the landscape and visual harm arising from increased vehicular use resulting

from the proposed development. This matter has been dealt with in the proof of Mr Millington where

it is demonstrated that the proposed development will not give rise to significant traffic increases in

the AONB and that of Mr Jackson where it is concluded that In landscape and visual terms, the

limited and localised traffic increases will result in no more than very limited and localised effects

upon the tranquillity and enjoyment of the AONB.

Herefordshire 5 Year Housing Land Supply Statement at 1st April 2019 (published July 2019)

6.73 The Council produced a 5-year Housing Land Supply Statement in July 2019, which covered the

period up to April 2019. Within this Statement, the Council acknowledge that they do not have a 5-

year supply, putting the figure at 4.05 years.

Page 23: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 22

6.74 The Proof of Mr Pycroft contends that the 5-year housing land supply position within Herefordshire

is significantly less than this at 2.94 years if you include 162 dwellings at the appeal site, which are

included in the Council’s five-year supply. If the appeal site is excluded, the deliverable supply would

reduce to 2.84 years.

6.75 In either case, it is established and agreed that Herefordshire are unable to demonstrate a 5-year

housing land supply.

Public Benefits in respect of Heritage Assets

6.76 As has been set out within the SoCG with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1), it has been agreed that

the proposals will have less than substantial harm however this is considered at the lower end of

that scale, with the potential for significant landscape mitigation to further minimise the harm. It is

acknowledged that there is no mechanism under policy LD4 to assess the harm and therefore regard

should be had to paragraph 196 of the NPPF. This requires the harm to be weighed against the

public benefits of the proposal.

6.77 In summary, the appeal proposals result in significant benefits including:

• The delivery of around 3ha of employment land, which will go towards meeting an identified

shortfall and the subsequent creation of a significant number of jobs;

• The delivery of market and affordable housing on an allocated site, when the Council is

unable to demonstrate a 5-year supply of housing;

• Safeguarding of land and contributions towards the reinstatement of the canal. This has

wider strategic benefits as the Canal Trust seeks to restore the entire length of the canal

between Gloucester and Hereford;

• Improved footpath and cycle links between the appeal site, town centre and existing

employment area to the north. And the creation of a linear park alongside the river.

6.78 It can therefore be concluded that the above public benefits, together with those set out in more

detail within section 8 of this statement significantly outweigh any harm to the Grade II Listed

Viaduct.

6.79 Within the SoCG with the Town Council (CD4.4), the only matter of disagreement relates to whether

an increase in traffic flow would harm the character and/ or appearance of the Conservation Area. It

is the opinion of Mr Sutton that the proposal would not have an impact. If the Inspector concludes

there is less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area, the benefits highlighted above would

clearly outweigh this harm.

Page 24: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 23

Conformity with the Development Plan

6.80 From the above assessment, it can be concluded that the appeal proposals accord with the

Development Plan. Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 sets out that

applications for planning permission must be determined in accordance with the Development Plan

unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Furthermore, paragraph 11(c) of the NPPF sets

out that for decision taking this means “approving development proposals that accord with an up-

to-date development plan without delay.”

6.81 As has been demonstrated above the appeal proposals are in conformity with the Development Plan

and therefore in accordance with paragraph 11(c) of the NPPF and Section 38(6) of the Planning and

Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 planning permission should be granted without any further delay.

The Tilted Balance

6.82 As has been set out at 2.7 of this proof, this evidence is not designed to be read in isolation and

should be taken as a whole when read with the evidence provided by the Appellant. As has been

set out above, the Appellant complies in full with the Development Plan and therefore in accordance

with paragraph 11 c) of the NPPF planning permission should be approved.

6.83 If the Inspector were to take the view that the proposals do not accord with the Development Plan,

then other material considerations would weigh in favour of the scheme such that the proposal

should be approved in line with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

6.84 Furthermore consideration needs to be given to paragraph 11d) of the NPPF, which states:

“where there are no relevant development plan policies, or the policies which are most important for determining the application are out-of-date7, granting permission unless:

i. the application of policies in this Framework that protect areas or assets of particular importance provides a clear reason for refusing the development proposed6; or

ii. any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole.”

6.85 Having regard to footnote 7 of 11(d), as has been set out above and as agreed in the SoCG’s (CD4.1

and CD4.3), the Council are unable to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply and upon this basis

policies relating to the supply of housing are not up to date. In relation to footnote 6, it is

acknowledged there are no areas or assets which would prevent the grant of planning permission.

Whilst it is acknowledged that the proposals would result in less than substantial harm to the Listed

Viaduct, the substantial public benefits set out above and further detailed within section 8 are

considered to significantly outweigh the harm to the Viaduct.

Page 25: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 24

6.86 Section 8 of this proof will therefore pull together all the strands of the proposal and demonstrate

that the significant benefits of the proposal outweigh any harm and that the appeal proposal

represents sustainable development in accordance with the NPPF.

Conclusions in respect of Planning Policy

6.87 This section demonstrates that planning permission should be granted under a number of different

scenarios, set out below.

i. The Appellants primary argument is that the proposals comply with the requirement of

paragraph 11(c) of the NPPF, which for decision taking means “approving development

proposals that accord with an up-to-date development plan without delay.

ii. Secondly, the proposals accord with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase

Act 2004 which sets out that “applications for planning permission must be determined in

accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise”.

In determining whether the proposals accord with the Development Plan when read as a

whole it is relevant to apply the findings in the Supreme Court’s decision in Tesco Stores

Ltd v Dundee City Council, where Lord Hope held at paragraph 34:

“In R v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, ex p Milne (No 2)… Sullivan J said that it

was not unusual for development plan policies to pull in different directions and, having

regard to what Lord Clyde said about the practical application of the statute rule in City of

Edinburgh… that he regarded as untenable the proposition that if there was a breach of any

one policy in a development plan a proposed development could not be said to be “in

accordance with the plan”. In para 52, he said that the relative importance of a given policy

to the overall objectives of the development plan was essentially a matter for the judgment

of the local planning authority and that a legalistic approach to the interpretation of

development plan policies was to be avoided.”

In this respect if there is any finding of conflict with the Development Plan it will be

necessary to determine whether the level of conflict is sufficient to on balance represent an

overall finding of conflict with the Development Plan. For context I refer to paragraph 53 of

the Secretary of State’s decision at Alrewas, Burton-upon-Trent, (CD11.29) where the site

lay outside the settlement boundary but was still found to conform with the Development

Plan.

Whilst I find there to be no conflict with the Development Plan in this appeal, if the decision

maker decides otherwise, there are a number of other material considerations which

significantly weigh in favour of the appeal and as a package would need to be weighed

against the identified conflict with the Development Plan.

Page 26: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 25

6.88 If the Inspector determines that the proposals do not conform with the Development Plan then a

further two scenarios come into play.

6.89 As will be demonstrated within Section 8 of this proof, there are other material considerations which

under Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 weigh in favour of the

scheme and demonstrate under the ‘normal planning balance’ that planning permission should be

granted.

iii. The planning system is not intended to frustrate the public interest. The benefits set out

below constitute material considerations which indicate that planning permission should be

granted even if the proposal does not accord with the development plan. To hold that the

development plan should trump the public interest in allowing the development to proceed

would be to go beyond the plan led system into impermissible slavish adherence to the

development plan (contrary to the findings made in the City of Edinburgh case at para. 1450

(CD11.30).

iv. It is also acknowledged that the Council is unable to demonstrate a 5-year housing land

supply and therefore the provisions of 11(d) of the NPPF and the ‘tilted balance’ should be

considered. It is acknowledged that Ledbury has an adopted Neighbourhood Plan, however

it does not allocate any sites for housing and as such the provisions of paragraph 14 of the

NPPF do not apply. As has been demonstrated above, there are no policies or adverse

impacts which would prevent planning permission being granted.

In this scenario (i.e. where the Council are unable to demonstrate a 5YHLS) it is relevant to

consider the weight to be attributed to policies which might otherwise be constraining the

delivery of housing where there is an overwhelming requirement for its provision. As set

out in Suffolk Coastal District Council [2017] UKSC 37 it is set out at paragraph 79 that

“Among the obvious constraints on housing development are development plan policies for

the preservation of the greenbelt, and environmental and amenity policies and designations

such as those referred to in footnote 9 of paragraph 14. The rigid enforcement of such

policies may prevent a planning authority from meeting its requirement to provide a five-

years supply.” The Judgement further sets out at paragraph 85 that “The decision-maker

should therefore be disposed to grant the application unless the presumption can be

displaced. It can be displaced on only two grounds both of which involve a planning

judgment that is critically dependent on the facts. The first is that the adverse impacts of a

grant of permission, such as encroachment on the greenbelt, will "significantly and

demonstrably" outweigh the benefits of the proposal. Whether the adverse impacts of a

grant of permission will have that effect is a matter to be "assessed against the policies in

the Framework, taken as a whole". That clearly implies that the assessment is not confined

to environmental or amenity considerations. The second ground is that specific policies in

the Framework, such as those described in footnote 9 to the paragraph, indicate that

Page 27: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 26

development should be restricted. From the terms of footnote 9 it is reasonably clear that

the reference to "specific policies in the Framework" cannot mean only policies originating

in the Framework itself. It must also mean the development plan policies to which the

Framework refers. Green belt policies are an obvious example”.

Applying the judgement of the Supreme Court to the subject appeal it is recommended that

if it were concluded that there are policies in the Development Plan which the appeal

proposal is contrary to (a position which would be contrary to my own conclusions) the

weight to be attributed to those policies should be reduced accordingly to enable an

otherwise sustainable form of development to be brought forward.

6.90 Under each of the scenarios set out above, it is concluded that planning permission should be

granted.

Page 28: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 27

7. THIRD PARTY COMMENTS

7.1. A number of public comments were received as part of the original planning application and appeal

process (CD10.1-CD10.348 and CD17.1-CD17.18). These have been reviewed along with the

comments from the Town Council and neighbouring Parish Council’s and considered with the main

issues being raised set out in the topic headings below together with how the matters have been

addressed as part of the appeal proposals.

Single Point of Access into the development

7.2. The key concern raised by the majority of the respondents relates to the single point of access

proposed into the site. There have been a significant number of questions raised as to why an

additional access cannot be created under the viaduct as this is considered to be a more logical

access which connects more easily to the highways network.

Appellant Response:

7.3. There are two stands to these comments, which will be addressed in turn.

7.4. The first relates to the single point of access into the site. In respect of the Development Plan policy

LB2 which requires “provision of satisfactory vehicle access arrangements”. There is no

requirement within policy for the provision of two vehicular accesses into the site. The application

was robustly assessed by the Councils Highways Officer and as concluded within the Council’s

Update Report to Committee (CD12.3), it is acknowledged at 2.2 that “it has been demonstrated

that a satisfactory access strategy for all modes can be provided utilising a singular access from the

Bromyard Road. The proposals therefore meet the objectives of policy SS4, MT1 and LB2 to an

appropriate level. Furthermore, the requirements of NPPF paragraphs 108-111 are also satisfied. The

highways network can accommodate the development without an acceptable impact on highway

safety and the impact on the road network is not severe”. Furthermore, it has been agreed within

the Highways SoCG (CD4.2) at 2.1.4 that “there are no matters of disagreement between the LHA

and the Appellant on Highways and Transport matters”. As such, the provision of a single access

into the development is acceptable.

7.5. The second matter, relates to the creation of a vehicular access under the viaduct. This concern was

the reason for the deferral of the matter at the November Planning Committee. The Officer’s Update

Report to Committee (CD12.3), summarises the Appellants response to this which sets out that the

proposal provides a policy compliant scheme. Furthermore, it is set out that “Constructing a new

highway with all necessary excavations, foundations and service infrastructure under the arches of

a C19 Grade II Listed Structure which supports an operational rail line 20m above would expose

Bloor Homes and our contractors to significant Health and Safety risks during construction and

operational”.

Page 29: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 28

7.6. A subsequent letter from Network Rail dated 9th December 2019 (CD8.37 sets out that “Having held

conversations with NRIL’s Structures Asset Engineer we would not allow a public highway to be

built beneath the structure as it would introduce undue risk to the railway. These risks would include

making the piers susceptible to bridge strikes and increasing the difficulty for our examiners to gain

access to the piers for inspection. The vibrations caused by the construction and continued use of

any highway would also increase the risk profile of the asset going forward”.

7.7. The addition of an access under the viaduct has been fully explored with Network Rail, but for

reasons set out above, it is not suitable.

Increase in traffic/ pressure on highways infrastructure

7.8. In line with the comments above, a significant number of comments were received in relation to the

increase in traffic on minor roads, both by cars and HGV’s. There are further concerns relating to

traffic congestion with the access under the railway bridge an existing bottleneck.

Appellant Response:

7.9. As has been set out within the Highways SoCG (CD4.2), there are no matters of disagreement

between the Highways Authority and Appellant in respect of highways matters, albeit it is

acknowledged that highways matters in part still remain a matter of disagreement between the

appellant and Town Council.

7.10. A number of highways mitigation measures are proposed as part of the proposals, these are set out

at 6.58 and 6.69 of the Officers Committee Report (CD12.4) and include:

Mitigation measures associated with the proposed scheme include the following:

• Site access, emergency access and footway on Bromyard Road

• Pedestrian / cycle connection to Ballard Close and Hereford Road

• Pedestrian / cycle connection under viaduct connecting to The Town Trail

• Pedestrian /cycle connection on Hereford Road including a two new crossing points

• Hereford Road / Bromyard Road / The Homend, signalised junction improvement scheme

including pedestrian control

Furthermore, Section 106 contributions are also secured which can be used against some or all of

the following transportation related schemes –

• Upgrading of the Town Trail to include bridge widening, street lighting, surfacing etc

Page 30: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 29

• Contributions to Safe Routes to Schools including provision of safe crossing facilities

• Improvements to public transport provision including upgrading of infrastructure

• Contributions towards parking controls, loading, re-paving etc

7.11. As acknowledged by Officers at 2.3 of the Committee Update Report (CD12.3), “with the proposed

appropriate mitigation measures, it has been demonstrated that the local highway network can

absorb the traffic impacts of the development without adversely affecting the safe and efficient flow

of traffic on the network and that traffic impacts can be managed to acceptable levels to reduce and

mitigate any adverse impact from the development”. As such, the proposals are considered

acceptable in this regard.

Lack of Footpaths and connectivity

7.12. Concerns have been raised that there are insufficient walkways and cycle ways from the

development to the school and town centre.

Appellant Response:

7.13. A key criteria of policy LB2 is the need for “New walking, cycling and bus links from the urban

extension directly to the town trail and riverside walk under the viaduct, the railway station and town

centre to create linkages to nearby development and existing community facilities”.

7.14. As is set out at 7.10 above, a host of measures are proposed providing residents of the proposed

development with a real alternative to the private car.

Provision of Employment Land

7.15. The provision of employment land provided a mix response. Some responses suggested that

Ledbury is desperate for more employment land, and employment opportunities questioning

whether existing businesses could expand into the employment land. Others suggested that there

were more accessible sites available and questioned whether adequate parking could be provided

on site.

Appellant Response:

7.16. The provisions of policy LB2 require 3 hectares of employment land to be provided. The appellant is

proposing to provide employment land in line with the allocation. This will be located adjacent to the

existing Bromyard Trading Estate, providing existing businesses with the opportunity to expand if

they wished. Policy SS5 of the Core Strategy sets out that there are new strategic employment

locations identified including for 15ha in Ledbury. Policy E1 identifies a strategic location for 12ha of

employment land to the west of the town, south of Little Marcle Road. The appeal proposals will

Page 31: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 30

deliver the remaining 3ha identified. The layout and scale of the proposed employment land is a

reserved matter for future consideration. However appropriate parking would be provided in line

with Herefordshire Council standards.

Impact on Local Facilities

7.17. A number of concerns have been raised over whether existing medical, and education facilities can

accommodate the increase in population. There are also concerns about the lack of sports facilities

within the town.

Appellant Response:

7.18. Policy LB2 requires “The provision of developer contributions towards any identified need for

new/improved community facilities/infrastructure improvements. This shall include a new 210 place

primary school within the development (or an expansion of the existing primary school) and new

recreational open space, play, indoor and outdoor sport facilities”.

7.19. As part of the appeal proposals, a Section 106 Agreement (CD6.1) has been prepared which will

provide contributions towards the following:

• Education contributions towards Ledbury Primary School and John Masefield Secondary

School

• Transport- Schemes identified in the Ledbury Transport Study

• Outdoor Sports for outdoor sports facilities as identified in the Councils Playing Pitch

Assessment 2012 and Outdoor Sports Investment Plan 2019

• Primary Care for the provision of additional accommodation for primary medical facilities in

Ledbury

• Hospital- For the provision of hospital facilities in Hereford

7.20. This is considered appropriate to mitigate against the impact of the proposals.

Impact on the Listed Viaduct

7.21. A small number of concerns have been raised regarding the impact of the proposals on the setting

of the Grade II Listed Viaduct.

Appellant Response:

7.22. It is set out and acknowledged within the SoCG (CD4.1) with Herefordshire Council that the

proposed development will result in less than substantial harm to the Grade II Listed Viaduct with it

being acknowledged that this would be at the lower end of that scale, with significant landscape

mitigation further minimising the harm. As has been demonstrated within this proof, and as

Page 32: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 31

acknowledged within the SoCG, the public benefits of this proposal outweigh this minimal level of

harm.

Flooding

7.23. Concerns have been raised regarding flooding on the appeal site at times of heavy rainfall.

Appellant Response:

7.24. The application was accompanied by a detailed Flood Risk Assessment (CD8.51), which attracted

no objection from the Environment Agency or Land Drainage Consultant. As the proposals were

submitted in outline, detailed drainage details would need to be submitted as part of the subsequent

reserved matters application. It should be noted that the Officer in their Committee Report (CD12.4)

at 6.169 concluded that “the management of surface and land drainage can be satisfactorily

accommodated on the site and as such the requirements of policy SD3 can be met”. This is a matter

which has been agreed in the SoCG’s with both Herefordshire Council and the Town Council (CD4.1

and CD4.3)

The Proposed Canal

7.25. A number of representations questioned the need for the canal, how it would be funded and whether

it is actually required.

Appellant Response:

7.26. Policy LB2 requires “Land and contributions to facilitate a restored canal to be delivered in

partnership with the Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal Trust”. As is demonstrated within the

accompanying masterplan (CD8.15), land is safeguarded for the canal. This is part of a long-term

strategic aim of restoring the canal between Gloucester and Hereford. Consistent with the original

aims of the appeal proposal the safeguarding of land and Section 106 contribution towards this will

help to facilitate this in line with the policy. The deliverability of the canal on the site/in the wider

area is something the Inspector will have to determine when assessing whether the land and

contributions set out in the s106 agreement are ‘necessary’. If the answer to that question is ‘yes’

it will be for the Canal Trust to determine in due course whether the canal can actually be delivered

like any form of development.

Impact on the setting of the AONB

7.27. A number of concerns have been raised to the impact of the proposals on the setting of the Malvern

Hills AONB and the additional traffic through the AONB.

Appellant Response:-

Page 33: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 32

7.28. As is set out in the SoCG (CD4.1), it is agreed between the Council and Appellant that the increase

in vehicular traffic and associated disturbance will not result in an unacceptable impact on the AONB,

albeit this matter still remains a matter of disagreement between the Appellant and the Town

Council. -As is set out in the proof of Mr Jackson at 8.21 In landscape and visual terms, the limited

and localised traffic increases will result in no more than very limited and localised effects upon the

tranquillity and enjoyment of the AONB.

Proposed Housing

7.29. A handful of comments questions the need for the numbers of homes proposed, and also

questioned whether genuinely affordable homes would be provided.

Appellant Response:

7.30. The site is allocated by way of policy LB2 of the Core Strategy for 625 dwellings. As such the

proposal is in line with the allocation. In respect of affordable housing, the appeal proposals will

deliver 40% affordable housing on site in line with a mix agreed with the Council in line with their

identified need.

Page 34: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 33

8. BALANCING EXERCISE/ SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND IMPACTS

8.1. As has been set out above at Section 6, it is the Appellants contention in the first two scenarios

presented that the proposal accords with the Development Plan and should therefore be allowed in

accordance with paragraph 11c) and Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act

2004.

8.2. Notwithstanding the above, if the Inspector considers there to be conflict with the Development

Plan then in accordance with Section 38(6), the other material considerations under the ‘normal

planning balance’ weigh in favour of the scheme. In this scenario the package of benefits are very

substantial indeed, including the site’s allocation in the Local Plan. With this in mind any conflict with

planning policy would have to be very substantial indeed to outweigh the identified package of

benefits which exist in this case.

8.3. The other scenario which exists is that in relation to paragraph 11(d) of the NPPF, planning

permission should be granted unless the provisions of Limb 1 of Limb 2 apply.

8.4. Limb 1 of paragraph 11(d) advises that planning permission shouldn’t be granted where the policies

in the Framework that protect areas or assets of particular importance provides a clear reason for

refusing the development proposed. Footnote 6 sets out an exhaustive list of policies which are of

a type referenced by Limb 1. It is clear that no such policies are in play. Limb 1 is consequently not

engaged. Neither the Council’s reasons for refusal nor its Statement of Case indicate conflict with

footnote 6 policies.

8.5. Limb 2 is therefore the mechanism by which the appeal should be determined in this scenario. It

requires that planning permission is granted unless the adverse impacts of doing so would

significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits. This is commonly known as the ‘tilted

balance’.

8.6. Paragraph 10 of the NPPF sets out that “at the heart of the Framework is a presumption in favour

of sustainable development”.

8.7. In accordance with paragraph 8 of the NPPF achieving sustainable development means that the

planning system has three overarching objectives; economic, social and environmental. It is in

relation to these three objectives that the tilted balance should be applied. However as is set out in

paragraph 9 of the NPPF, “they are not criteria upon which every decision can or should be judged.”.

These have been assessed below:

Delivery of Employment Land

8.8 The appeal proposals look to deliver 2.9 hectares of employment land as shown on the Land Use

drawing 9600 Rev G (CD8.10). This is in line with the allocation under Policy LD2. Policy SS5 of the

Core Strategy sets out that there are new strategic employment locations identified including for

Page 35: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 34

15ha in Ledbury. Policy E1 identifies a strategic location for 12ha of employment land to the west of

the town, south of Little Marcle Road. The appeal proposals will deliver the remaining 3ha identified.

8.9 The Council’s Economic Development Manager in their response (CD9.6) sets out that should this

development not be approved “this may impact on the ability of Ledbury to meet the employment

requirements of its local population”. He further goes on to state that “it is my opinion that the

number of jobs that could be accommodated within the allocation would be substantial and likely to

be 150 and probably would be in excess of this figure”.

8.10 The employment land to be provided as part of the appeal proposals will help to meet an identified

need in the town, and will provide high quality B1 accommodation. Paragraph 80 of the NPPF is very

clear that “significant weight should be placed on the need to support economic growth and

productivity”. Furthermore, this is likely to provide further employment opportunities within the

town. As a result, the delivery of employment land should be given significant weight in favour of

the proposals.

Delivery of Housing

8.11 Paragraph 8 of the NPPF is clear that one of the key social objectives is “to support strong, vibrant

and healthy communities, by ensuring that a sufficient number and range of homes can be provided

to meet the needs of present and future generations”. The appeal proposal provides for both market

and affordable housing. The matter of affordable housing is considered in more detail below.

8.12 In respect of market housing, the Council have acknowledged that they are unable to deliver a five-

year supply of housing (albeit the exact supply is a matter of disagreement between parties). The

most recent Annual Position Statement (CD1.14) published in July 2019, acknowledges at 2.14 that

“The Housing Delivery Test result for Herefordshire was 74%. Therefore, as the result is less than

95% delivery rate, an action plan will be published in August 2019 to address under delivery.” A

Housing Delivery Test Action Plan (CD1.16) was duly published. At Appendix 1 of the Action Plan, it

was acknowledged that in respect of the appeal site that “most issues with regard to the application

have been resolved and is due to be scheduled for planning committee soon”. Furthermore, at 4.30-

4.32 of the Annual Position Statement, it is anticipated that the appeal site will start delivering homes

in the second supply year (2020/2021).

8.13 The delivery of new homes within Ledbury, will provide an alternative to the second-hand market,

adding choice and competition, thereby allowing residents better opportunity to remain in the area.

There is thus greater opportunity to contribute positively towards social cohesion through the

retention of family connections and the influx of a more diverse range of people.

8.14 Whilst the Council suggest they have a supply of 4.05 years, the Proof of Mr Pyecroft, considers

this to be significantly less at 2.93 years, if you include the 162 dwellings at the Appeal site included

in the Council’s give year supply and 2.83 years, if the appeal site were excluded. This is a

significantly worse situation than the Council have previously identified.

Page 36: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 35

8.15 Given the significant housing land supply deficit in Herefordshire, the delivery of market housing on

an allocated site submitted by a national housebuilder should be afforded very significant weight in

favour of the proposals.

Delivery of Affordable Housing

8.16 The proposal seeks to provide a policy compliant level of affordable housing (40%) in accordance

with policy H1 of the Core Strategy. Policy H1 within the supporting text acknowledges that “there

is significant need for affordable housing within Herefordshire”. Within the Inspector’s Report on

the Core Strategy (CD1.5), it was acknowledged at paragraphs 32-33 that there is an affordable

housing need for 3,457 homes across Herefordshire over the 2012-2017 period, the equivalent of

691pa. It is acknowledged that this is unlikely to be achieved and as a result the current need was

distributed over the plan period (2012-2031) which results in a need for 369 homes per annum.

8.17 The Action Plan (CD1.16) produced in 2019, at Appendix A sets out that the affordable housing

delivery has resulted in 203 dwellings in 2018-2019, 171 dwellings in 2017-2018, and 135 dwellings

in 2016-2017. This is significantly below the need identified within Herefordshire.

8.18 Since the base date of the Core Strategy (2011/2012), there has only been one affordable home

delivered in Ledbury. It is concluded within Mr Stacey’s proof that there is a substantial need for

affordable housing in Herefordshire. There is an objectively assessed need for 5,667 net affordable

homes between 2011/12 and 2018/19. This should be viewed in the context of a shortfall in delivery

of 4,604 affordable homes already having arisen against identified needs in the same eight-year

period.

8.19 As a result, the delivery of 40% (policy compliant) affordable housing on an allocated site, where

there is a known housing land supply deficit and significant under provision of affordable housing

should attract nothing less than substantial weight in favour of the proposals.

Construction, Employment and Additional disposable income in the area

8.20 There are two different strands to this; during construction and post construction.

8.21 During the construction period, significant jobs will be created during the development and building

of the new homes and employment land proposed. Furthermore, there will be indirect employment

benefits through the supply of materials for the site.

8.22 More specifically, there would be workforce training and apprenticeship opportunities as a result of

the proposed development. Bloor Homes, employ Apprentice Masters to support young people and

are committed to supporting women in construction. Bloor Launched its apprenticeship scheme in

2014 and now have well over 100 apprentices employed across the company’s seven regions, in

roles including carpentry and bricklaying. They also have more than 70 trainees across the business

Page 37: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 36

in commercial, design, technical and sales and marketing positions. Bloor Homes would bring such

opportunities to Ledbury.

8.23 A report entitled “The Economic Footprint of UK House Building” (March 2015) was prepared on

behalf of the House Builders Federation and identifies that the construction of a new dwelling

generates the equivalent of 1.5 jobs (page 13) and a further 1.5 jobs if one considers the supply

chain (e.g. suppliers of materials and the spending of those directly employed) (page 14). The appeal

scheme would therefore provide the opportunity to create 1,875 jobs during the construction phase

for the residential element of the proposals only.

8.24 Once completed and as set out above, the employment land is likely to generate in excess of 150

jobs. Furthermore, it is likely additional jobs will be created indirectly through the supply of services

and skills to serve the B1 units. The increased population in the town, will also help to support the

shops and retail offering in the town centre with increased spending.

Green Infrastructure

8.25 As part, of the proposals, there are a whole host of green infrastructure improvements proposed.

8.26 As part of the proposals and as shown on the Green Infrastructure Plan (drawing 9603 Rev E

(CD8.13)) significant areas of open space are proposed on the site. This presents an opportunity for

not only ecological improvements identified below but also provides future residents of the

development with high quality open space, which incorporates the route for the canal, which will

have a positive benefit on their health and social wellbeing and thus helps to create a sense of

community.

8.27 Policy LB2 of the Core Strategy seeks “new walking, cycling and bus links from the urban extension

directly to the town trail and riverside walk under the viaduct, the railway station and town centre to

create linkages to nearby development and existing community facilities”. This is also an ambition

of policy TR1.1 of the Ledbury Neighbourhood Plan. As can be demonstrated within the proposals,

proposed footway/ cycleway connection at the south-east boundary of the site and Ballard Close

together with improvements to the town trail are proposed as part of the scheme.

8.28 The proposed linkages will ensure that the new development will integrate with the existing town

and provide occupiers of the new development with real alternatives to the car to access Ledbury

Town Centre. Furthermore, the improved links will provide existing residents with improved links to

the existing employment land to the north of the appeal site.

8.29 In respect of biodiversity Policy LD2 of the Core Strategy states that “Development proposals should

conserve, restore and enhance the biodiversity and geodiversity assets of Herefordshire, through

the:

1. Retention and protection of nature conservation sites and habitats, and important species

in accordance with their status

Page 38: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 37

2. Restoration and enhancement of existing biodiversity and geodiversity features on site and

connectivity to wider ecological networks; and

3. Creation of new biodiversity features and wildlife habitats”.

8.30 As no objection was raised to the proposals by Council’s Ecologist subject to conditions (CD9.11-

9.15), it is not intended is look at this matter in detail. As has been demonstrated within the

Ecological Assessment (CD8.58) which accompanied the planning application at 7.14 that “In

conclusion, through the implementation of the safeguards and recommendations set out within this

report it is considered that the proposals accord with planning policy with regard to nature

conservation at all administrative levels. In addition, it is considered that the recommendations

outlined would create a net enhancement to biodiversity post development.”

8.31 Overall, the proposals present a package of green infrastructure improvements including the

provision of open space, additional footpath and cycle links to the town centre and wider biodiversity

enhancements. These benefits are further echoed within the Landscape Proof of Mr Jackson.

Collectively, these should be seen as a moderate benefit in favour of the proposals.

Landscape Impacts

8.32 As is acknowledged within the Officers Committee Report (CD12.4), the sites location means it acts

as a gateway into Ledbury and sits within the setting of the AONB. The site is allocated for residential

and employment development by way of policy LB2 of the Core Strategy. Within this policy, there

is specific criteria which states development “that contributes to the distinctiveness of this part of

Ledbury and respects the setting and significance of the listed viaduct and the Malvern Hills Area of

Outstanding Natural Beauty”. The impact on the listed viaduct has been assessed below. The Green

Infrastructure Plan which accompanies the application (Drawing 9603 Rev E, CD8.13) shows a

landscape buffer with the Officer in their committee report at 6.81 stating “The proposed buffer

includes on average a 10m buffer which is shown to vary in width so as to provide variation in the

level of screening offered (10m being widely regarded as sufficient to screen, and 5m to soften

development) and provide character when stood next to its edge. With this in mind the northern

boundary is to provide a landscape buffer which will suitably ‘softened’ the impact of the

development from views, beyond the site, including along the Bromyard Road. On the basis that the

site will provide a new urban edge to Ledbury. This approach is considered to be an entirely

appropriate response on the basis that new development will be partly visible (more so in winter

months) such that one is aware of the new settlement edge when approaching the settlement rather

than it being almost entirely screened”.

8.33 The Officer concludes at 6.82 of the Committee Report that “In summary on this matter, the

masterplan and buffers shown on the site’s northern boundary are considered to be a positive

response to the new settlement edge and one which will soften views of the urban extension and

indeed provide, through details which will form part of a Reserved Matters application, an improved

Page 39: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 38

entrance to Ledbury along the Bromyard Road mindful of the current edge being the industrial

buildings further to the east”.

8.34 As is concluded within the proof of Mr Jackson, in landscape and visual terms the site represents a

logical and appropriate location for development. The proposed development presents opportunities

to improve the immediate landscape setting and approach to Ledbury from the north, maintaining

the positive landscape and visual contributions of the viaduct. Subsequent reserved matters

applications will ensure that opportunities and benefits are maximised.

8.35 Overall, it is considered the proposal will result in limited landscape benefits.

Improved services and facilities

8.36 As a requirement of policy LB2, the provision of developer contributions are sought “towards any

identified need for new/improved community facilities/infrastructure improvements. This shall

include a new 210 place primary school within the development (or an expansion of the existing

primary school) and new recreational open space, play, indoor and outdoor sport facilities”.

8.37 As part of the Section 106 Agreement, the Appellant has agreed contributions in respect of

Education for Ledbury primary School and John Masefield Secondary School, Transport for schemes

identified in the Ledbury transport Strategy, Outdoor Spores, Primary Case for the provision of

additional accommodation for primary medical care facilities in Ledbury and hospital for the provision

of hospital facilities in Ledbury. Whilst the appeal proposals may provide some benefits to the wider

population, they are ultimately designed to mitigate against the proposed development and as such

they should be afforded limited weight in favour of the proposals.

Sustainable Construction and Operation

8.38 As part of the assessment of the application, the Council requested an overview of the sustainability

credentials of the scheme. These are set out in detail at 6.41 of the Officers Committee Report

(CD12.4) and at Appendix 1 of this proof, however in summary a number of measures are proposed,

these include:

• Adoption of a fabric first approach. This involves maximising the performance of

components and materials that make up the building fabric itself, before considering the use

of mechanical or electrical building services systems.

• During construction, a comprehensive Site Waste Management Plan will be in operation.

Once completed, the proposed development will provide measures for waste and recycling

on the site.

• Wider range of sustainable transport measures including;

o Pedestrian and cycle infrastructure

Page 40: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 39

o Residential and Employment Travel Plans

o Electric Vehicle Charging

8.39 As a result, this is considered to result in a limited benefit which should weigh in favour of the

proposals.

Drainage

8.40 As part of the original application, a detailed Flood Risk Assessment (CD8.51) was submitted, which

demonstrated that the proposal complied with the guidance in the NPPF and associated PPG. Clearly

the detailed drainage scheme will be provided as part of the reserved matters, however it should be

seen as a limited benefit in favour of the proposals.

Reinstatement of canal

8.41 Policy LB2 of the Core Strategy, requires “land and contributions to facilitate a restored canal to be

delivered in partnership with the Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal Trust”. As is

demonstrated on drawing 9603 Rev E (CD8.13) and 9701 Rev L (CD8.15) land is provided for the

canal. Furthermore, it is proposed as part of the Section 106 Agreement to make a contribution in

order to facilitate this. During the course of the application, two contribution amounts were put

forward to the Council and it will now be for the Inspector to determine which meets the CIL

Regulations and is considered necessary to meet the objective of Policy LB2. The two contributions

are explained in section 6 of this proof.

8.42 I will now deal with the weight to be attributed to the canal element of the proposal in either of the

two scenarios where the decision maker potentially concludes that the proposal is not consistent

with the Development Plan. The first question to be asked is whether there is a need for land and

contributions to facilitate the restoration of the canal as to be set out in the s106 agreement. In this

respect the decision maker must be satisfied that the land and contributions are ‘necessary’ when

considering the prospects of the canal ever being delivered on the site. If the conclusion reached is

that because of obstacles to its delivery (such as roads or the lack of the existing linkage either side

of the proposed section of canal) it’s very unlikely to ever come forward and therefore the land and

contributions being proposed within the s106 agreement are unnecessary, no weight should

accordingly be attributed to the canal in the planning balance because the canal land and contribution

would be effectively struck out of the s106 by the Inspector.

8.43 However if the decision maker determines that land and one of the proposed contributions are

necessary to meet the statutory tests set out in Regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure

Levy Regulations 2010, then moderate weight in favour of the canal should be given to this element

of the scheme in my opinion.

Air Quality and Noise

Page 41: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 40

8.44 It is acknowledged that there are no concerns raised by the Council in respect of Air Quality and

Noise subject to the imposition of conditions. I therefore consider that the appeal proposals would

have a neutral impact on, air quality and noise.

Heritage

8.45 As is acknowledged within the SoCG (CD4.1), it has been agreed that the proposals will have less

than substantial harm to the Grade II Listed Ledbury Viaduct however this is considered at the lower

end of that scale, with significant landscape mitigation further minimising the harm. Overall, it is

considered that the proposal would have a minor adverse impact on heritage assets. However, it is

acknowledged within the SoCG, that the public benefits of the proposal outweigh this minimal level

of harm.

8.46 The Heritage Proof prepared by Mr Sutton concludes at 7.3 that “the views of the viaduct from the

south on the A438 would not be affected by the Appeal Scheme (i.e. it would not be perceptible).

The slight impact, very much at lower end of ‘less than substantial harm’, that would come about

from the change to views from the B4214 (looking south) would be outweighed by the public

(heritage) benefits that would come from the improved access and views of the structure, that would

ultimately better reveal its significance. In the context of the tests within the NPPF the public

(specifically heritage) benefits would outweigh the harm; and in the context of the legislative test

within the Act, this equates to ‘preserving its special architectural and historic interest’”

8.47 Whilst it is acknowledged within the SoCG with Ledbury Town Council that there remains

disagreement as to whether the proposed increase in traffic would cause harm to the Conservation

Area, the conclusions reached by Mr Sutton sets out that these increases would not be significant

and they would in no way change the character or appearance of the designated heritage asset.

Summary of Benefits

8.48 The above benefits set out above, have been summarised in the below table:

Contributing Factors Scale and Type of Impact

Delivery of Employment Land Very Significant Benefit

Delivery of Housing Very Significant Benefit

Delivery of a policy compliant level of affordable

housing on an allocated site. Very Significant Benefit

Construction, Employment and Additional

disposable income in the area Moderate Benefit

Green Infrastructure including the provision of Public

Open Space, Improved Footpath and cycle links,

Improved biodiversity

Moderate Benefit

Wider Landscape Impacts Limited Benefit

Improved services and facilities Limited Benefit

Sustainable Construction and Operation Limited Benefit

Drainage Limited Benefit

Page 42: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 41

Safeguarding of land and financial contribution to

facilitate a restored canal No Weight or Moderate Benefit1

Air Quality, Noise Neutral Impact

Impact on Designated Heritage Assets Neutral Impact

Concluding comments in respect of the balancing exercise

8.49 Returning to the balancing exercise required by Limb 2, it is my view that the cumulative benefits of

the appeal proposal are substantial. In this case, the only adverse impact identified is that the relating

to the impact on designated heritage assets and specifically the Grade II Listed Viaduct. However

as has been identified earlier within the proof and the signed SoCG the public benefits exercise

required by paragraph 196 of the NPPF outweigh the harm.

1 See ‘Restoration of canal’ earlier sub-section

Page 43: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 42

9 PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND CONDITIONS

9.8 A Section 106 Agreement accompanies the appeal (CD6.1). This is accompanied by a Compliance

Statement (CD6.2) prepared by the LPA which demonstrates how the Section 106 Agreement

meets the requirements of the CIL Regulations.

9.9 A list of draft conditions (CD4.7) has been agreed between the LPA and Appellant.

Page 44: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 43

10 CONCLUSIONS

10.1 This Proof of Evidence has been prepared by Guy Wakefield on behalf of Bloor Homes Western in

respect of Herefordshire Council’s refusal of planning application (reference: 171532) which is

described as follows:

“Site for a mixed use development including the erection of up to 625 new homes (including

affordable housing), up to 2.9 hectares of B1 employment land, a canal corridor, public open space

(including a linear park), access, drainage, and ground modelling works and other associated works.

The proposal is for outline planning permission with all matters reserved for future consideration

with the exception of access”.

10.2 The application was refused at planning committee, with the decision notice being dated 12 th

December 2019. The Council subsequently decided not to contest the appeal. Following on from

this, Ledbury Town Council were granted Rule 6 Status.

10.3 As is set out in the SoCG with Herefordshire Council (CD4.1), the only matters which remains as

disagreement is the level of shortfall in the five-year housing land supply. This is a matter which has

been dealt with in detail within the proof of Mr Pyecroft.

10.4 Having regard to all the evidence set out above, the following conclusions have been drawn:

10.5 The site is allocated for development by policy LB2 of the Herefordshire Core Strategy. As is

demonstrated within Section 6 of this Proof, the proposals accord with the policy. The reasons for

refusal predominantly related to Highways, impact on the AONB and the impact on the Ledbury

Conservation Area. These matters have all been dealt with and addressed within the proofs of Mr

Millington, Mr Jackson and Mr Sutton.

10.6 It is therefore the appellants view that the appeal proposals accord with the Development Plan and

therefore in line with paragraph 11(c) of the NPPF and Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory

Purchase Act 2004 planning permission should be granted without any further delay.

10.7 Notwithstanding the above, if the Inspector were to conclude that the proposals did not accord with

the Development Plan then other material considerations would weigh in favour of the scheme such

that the proposal should be approved in line with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory

Purchase Act 2004. Furthermore, the Council is unable to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply.

As a result, and because paragraph 14 does not apply for the reasons explained within the Proof,

the tilted balance is engaged in accordance with paragraph 11(d) of the NPPF.

10.8 In accordance with paragraph 8 of the NPPF achieving sustainable development means that the

planning system has three overarching objectives: economic, social and environmental. It is in

relation to these three objectives that the tilted balance should be applied. However as is set out in

paragraph 9 of the NPPF, “they are not criteria upon which every decision can or should be judged.”.

Page 45: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 44

10.9 Where it is agreed in the SoCG with the LPA (CD4.1) that there is some harm to the Grade II Listed

Viaduct this is considered to be less than substantial, at the lower end of the spectrum, and the

public benefits significantly outweighs the less than substantial harm for the purpose of paragraph

196 of the NPPF. In the context of section 69 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation Area)

Act 1990 the heritage harm is outweighed by the heritage benefits such that the proposal is

consistent with the Act or in the words of Mr Sutton re the legislative test within the Act “… this

equates to ‘preserving its special architectural and historic interest’...”.

10.10 There are no technical matters which would preclude the grant of planning permission.

10.11 For these reasons, therefore, the Secretary of State is respectfully invited to grant planning

permission.

Page 46: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Project No. 5008267 45

AP

PE

ND

IX 1

N

ote

on

su

sta

ina

bil

ity

Page 47: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Land North of Ledbury Viaduct – Sustainability Credentials 1

LAND NORTH OF LEDBURY VIADUCT – SUSTAINABILITY CREDENTIALS

STATEMENT

This Note has been prepared by Ridge and Partners LLP to briefly outline the sustainable development

credentials of Bloor Homes Western’s outline application for a mixed-use development including the erection

of up to 625 new homes (including affordable housing), up to 2.9 hectares of B1 employment land, a canal

corridor, public open space (including linear park), access, drainage and ground modelling works and other

associated works on Land to the North of Ledbury Viaduct.

Approach to Sustainable Dwelling Construction and Materials

The ‘Fabric First’ Approach

Bloor Homes is a Home Builders Federation 5-star builder for 2019 with customer satisfaction currently

at 94%. Key to this rating is the quality and energy efficiency of their new homes as demanded by new

homeowners.

Bloors’ priority is always to use a ‘fabric first’ approach in order to reduce CO2 demand by being lean,

clean and green. The fabric-first approach as controlled by Building Regulations reduces the call on energy

demand in the first place; thereby helping to reduce overall energy generation requirements and reducing

running costs and bills.

A ‘fabric first’ approach to building design involves maximising the performance of the components and

materials that make up the building fabric itself, before considering the use of mechanical or electrical

building services systems. This can help reduce capital and operational costs, improve energy efficiency

and reduce carbon emissions and demand. A ‘fabric first’ method can also reduce the need for

maintenance during the building’s life.

With regard to specific ‘fabric first’ measures, as well as high efficiency wall, roof, floor insulation, Bloor

also use thermal plasterboards, insulated doors, A-rated low carbon Boilers (which can include flue-gas

heat recovery), ‘shower save’ waste water heat recovery systems, argon filled double glazing, and 100%

low energy light bulbs.

Sustainable Transport Measures

A wide range of sustainable transport measures are provided for by the application proposals including the

following.

Pedestrian and Cycle Infrastructure Strategy

• New pedestrian and cycle paths connecting the site to the wider services and facilities of Ledbury

via Ballard Close and beneath the viaduct to the north of the Hereford Road roundabout;

• A 3m shared footway / cycleway on Hereford Road;

Page 48: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Land North of Ledbury Viaduct – Sustainability Credentials 2

• Widening of Ledbury footpath ZB18 to provide a shared footway / cycleway connecting to the Town

Trail;

• Two toucan crossings on Hereford Road, connecting the Ballard Close access to the Town Trail and

the viaduct access to New Mills Way and the Riverside Park;

• Signalisation of the Bromyard Road / Hereford Road junction to provide a pedestrian crossing;

• Widening of the footway outside Ledbury railway station;

• A footway from the Bromyard Road emergency access to the northern part of the Bromyard Road

Trading Estate;

• Passive provision within the site of pedestrian connections to the boundary of the Trading Estate for

a potential future connection.

Residential and Employment Travel Plans

• Provision of a Welcome Pack to include information of local sustainable transport measures such as

bus and train timetables, cycleways and any car share schemes;

• A voucher for three months of free local bus travel to encourage the use of public transport;

• A £100 voucher redeemable against purchase of an adult bicycle to encourage active transport;

• Provision of secure, covered cycle parking for the proposed employment units to encourage cycling

to work;

• Improvements to both existing and proposed walkways and site access points to increase pedestrian

and cyclist permeability and provide accessible walkways and cycle routes;

• Provision and funding of a Site Travel Plan Co-ordinator (STPC) to manage the implementation of

Travel Plan measures for both the residential and employment uses for one year following full

occupation of the residential element of the scheme; and

• Guidance to future employment site Travel Plan Co-ordinators to enable sustainable transport

initiatives to be maintained following the removal of the STPC role.

Electric Vehicle Charging • Bloor will install electric vehicle charging points to all plots with dedicated parking spaces. This

charging point will either be a socket within garages or within a weatherproof box on an external wall

and will provide the opportunity for homeowners to install charging units. It is also proposed that the

employment accommodation will provide EV charging points.

Social and Economic Sustainability

Page 49: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Land North of Ledbury Viaduct – Sustainability Credentials 3

The Economic Role

• The development proposal provides for up to 7 acres (2.9hectares) of employment land suitable for

new and / or expanding business within the B1 use class.

• The development will support a wide range of new employment opportunities as well as workforce

skills and training across a range of trades and disciplines over the lifetime of the build programme.

Bloor is committed to such training opportunities and around 15% of their workforce has ‘Trainee’ or

‘Apprentice’ in their job title.

• The scheme could potentially accommodate over 1,000 economically active residents who could

provide a valuable pool of labour and skills to support local economic growth and the wider economic

development objectives of Herefordshire.

• The gross annual income of new residents will generate disposal income which will benefit the local

economy.

The Social Role

• The proposal includes provision of 40% affordable dwellings (up to 250 affordable homes) for social

rent and shared ownership to meet the needs of those on lower incomes.

• The overall provision of up to 625 dwellings will support and sustain the vitality of the local community

through provision of choice across a range of 1, 2, 3 and 4-bed accommodation.

Waste Minimisation Measures

Design and Planning Stage

• Prior to commencement of the proposed development, a Construction and Environmental Management Plan will be prepared to inform and influence construction activity.

• The detailed design stage of the application will be designed to ensure where possible that any ground work undertaken will retain topsoil and waste on the site by recycling it elsewhere within the development.

• Modern methods of construction and material optimisation will be incorporated into the detailed design stage and implemented on-site to minimise waste arisings.

• The design stage of the development has accounted for the provision of recycling facilities, enabling sufficient space for such facilities. The dwellings will be assessed and the provision made to enable residents to store and manoeuvre wheelie bins and recycle boxes for storage and collection in a convenient manner.

• The development has been designed to allow sufficient space for waste collection vehicles to enter and manoeuvre throughout the site.

Page 50: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Land North of Ledbury Viaduct – Sustainability Credentials 4

Construction Phase

• As part of the Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP), the sources of waste and volumes will be

identified, along with a target for their re-use, recycle or disposal.

• As part of the process of responsible construction, waste materials will be sorted and recycled where

practical and possible, keeping landfill waste to an absolute minimum. Recycling bins specifically for

construction waste will be available on site during the construction process and it will be required that

contractors sort waste materials accordingly.

• Prior to the commencement of development, the anticipated volume of waste (per material) will be

calculated to ensure that storage and recycling facilities are commensurate to the level of construction

waste to be produced, to ensure efficiency.

• Any organic material displaced will be re-used in the landscaping to be undertaken as part of the

proposal

Occupation Phase

• The energy efficient design of the buildings will assist in minimising energy required to operate the buildings once occupied, minimising heat loss and the waste of energy.

• Provision will be made within the development for the inclusion of recycling and waste storage facilities; accessible for householders and for waste collection vehicles.

• Residents will be encouraged to recycle waste as described in a Welcome Pack from the developer as well as any literature and advice provided by Herefordshire Council.

• There will be the opportunity for residents to bring waste to Household Recycling Centres (HRC). The

closest to the site is Ledbury Household Recycling Centre, which is located on Little Marcle Road.

MATTER HOW TO BE ACHIEVED

Sustainable Dwelling Construction and Materials

Fabric First Approach

Reserved Matters as part of Bloor Homes’ own detailed design and build process.

Sustainable Transport Measure

Pedestrian and Cycle Infrastructure Strategy

Reserved Matters details, S278 and S38 Agreements

Residential and Employment Travel Plans

Planning condition or S106 agreement

Electric Vehicle Charging Points

Planning condition

Page 51: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Land North of Ledbury Viaduct – Sustainability Credentials 5

Waste Minimisation Measures

Design and Planning Stage

Planning condition(s) inc Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP)

Construction Phase

Planning Condition(s) inc. Site Waste Management Plan

Occupation Phase Planning Condition

Page 52: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

AP

PE

ND

IX 2

L

ett

er

on

Ca

na

l C

on

trib

uti

on

Page 53: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

Mr Roland Close, GW/EP/eds Planning Services, Herefordshire Council, Plough Lane, Hereford, HR4 0LE. 14th July 2017 Dear Roland, I am writing in regard to Bloor Homes’ current outline planning application for Land North of the Viaduct, Ledbury (Planning Application reference no.171532). To fulfill the Core Strategy’s requirement for “contributions” to facilitate the restoration of the Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal through the application site Bloor Homes are prepared to offer a financial contribution of £280,734. This sum has been calculated by reference to the cost of a reasonable, proportionate programme of works that would contribute towards the construction of the restored canal along an identified corridor of land to be provided by Bloor Homes. The sum offered is the cost of excavating a 10m wide linear depression along the general alignment of the canal within the canal corridor which is 1m deep at its deepest point with sides graded to 1:3 and to remove the soil/spoil off site. The Canal alignment in question is identified on the enclosed ‘Canal General Arrangement’ drawing (BWB Consulting). Such works would be fairly and reasonably related to the proposed development and the financial cost to undertake the excavation would, therefore, be an appropriate ‘contribution’ to facilitate the restoration of the Canal through the site on ‘land’ to be provided by Bloor Homes as required by Policy LB2. Notwithstanding the above, the 18m wide corridor of land which Bloor Homes is providing through the site for the ‘restored’ canal totals around 4.5 acres of developable land outside of the flood plain and would have a value of around £2m - £3m. A sum of £280,734 is the contribution which Bloor Homes hereby propose to be taken forward to a S106 Agreement with Herefordshire Council. Yours sincerely,

Guy Wakefield MRTPI Hunter Page Planning [email protected] Cc: N Rawlings Bloor Homes Western Enc.

Page 54: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

E

T

L

5

8

.3

m

M

P

1

3

6

.7

5

P

o

n

d

7

ET

L

M

P

1

3

6

.5

V

ia

d

u

c

t

18

W

a

r

e

h

o

u

s

e

9

Is

s

u

e

s

3

2

1

5

9

.5

m

D

e

p

o

t

C

o

l

q

u

h

o

u

n

Is

s

u

e

s

T

k

E

l S

u

b

S

ta

T

r

a

d

in

g

E

s

ta

te

B

r

o

m

y

a

r

d

R

o

a

d

5

7

.4

m

W

a

r

e

h

o

u

s

e

B

u

s

in

e

s

s

P

a

r

k

6

5

.9

m

P

o

n

d

S

in

k

s

C

h

e

s

tn

u

t V

illa

s

BROMYARD ROAD

E

l S

u

b

S

ta

R

iver

Is

s

u

e

s

H

o

u

s

e

O

r

c

h

a

r

d

T

a

n

k

s

P

o

n

d

L

e

a

d

o

n

R

4

1

0.0

00

5

0

.0

0

0

1

0

0

.

0

0

0

1

5

0

.

0

0

0

2

0

0

.

0

0

0

2

5

0

.

0

0

0

3

0

0

.

0

0

0

3

5

0

.

0

0

0

4

0

0

.

0

0

0

5

0

0

.

0

0

0

5

5

0

.

0

0

0

6

0

0

.

0

0

0

6

5

0

.

0

0

0

700.000

7

5

0

.

0

0

0

8

5

0

.

0

0

0

9

0

0

.

0

0

0

4

5

0

.

0

0

0

S

O

U

T

H

E

R

N

C

A

N

A

L

P

O

U

N

D

IL

:

5

0

.1

m

A

O

D

T

o

w

p

a

th

:

5

1

.7

m

A

O

D

C

E

N

T

R

A

L

C

A

N

A

L

P

O

U

N

D

IL

:

5

2

.4

m

A

O

D

T

o

w

p

a

th

:

5

4

.4

m

A

O

D

C

E

N

T

R

A

L

C

A

N

A

L

P

O

U

N

D

IL

:

5

5

.0

m

A

O

D

T

o

w

p

a

th

:

5

6

.1

m

A

O

D

Issues & Revisions

Rev Date Details of issue / revision RevDrw

CONSULTANCY | ENVIRONMENTINFRASTRUCTURE | BUILDINGS

Birmingham | 0121 233 3322

Leeds | 0113 233 8000

Manchester | 0161 233 4260

London | 020 7407 3879

Nottingham | 0115 924 1100

www.bwbconsulting.com

BWB Ref: Date: Scale@A1:

Drawn: Reviewed:

Drawing Status

Project - Originator - Zone - Level - Type - Role - Number Status

Drawing Title

Project Title

Client

Rev

© Copyright BWB Consulting Ltd

S2LUE-BWB-EWE-00-SK-EN-0006

PRELIMINARY

J O'Neill S Nelmes

BMW 2470

CANAL GA WITH TOPO

AND OS BACKGROUND

LEDBURY URBAN

EXTENSION

BLOOR HOMES

1:125004.05.16

P1

P1 04.05.16 Preliminary Issue SNJO'N

Notes

1. Do not scale this drawing. All dimensions must be checked/ verified

on site. If in doubt ask.

2. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all relevant architects,

engineers and specialists drawings and specifications.

3. All dimensions in millimetres unless noted otherwise. All levels in

metres unless noted otherwise.

4. Any discrepancies noted on site are to be reported to the engineer

immediately.

Key Plan

Legend

AutoCAD SHX Text
SO
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
INV
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
INV
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
SO
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
INV
AutoCAD SHX Text
SO
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
INV
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
SO
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
INV
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
SO
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
55 30
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
83.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
80.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
81.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.97
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
71.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
71.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
71.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
71.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
71.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
71.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
72.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
70.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
76.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
75.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
75.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
74.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
73.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
75.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
75.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
64.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
74.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
73.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
75.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.23
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
65.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
69.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
68.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.12
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
63.05
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
62.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.572
AutoCAD SHX Text
SRD7
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.794
AutoCAD SHX Text
SRD6
AutoCAD SHX Text
67.886
AutoCAD SHX Text
SRD5
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.093
AutoCAD SHX Text
SRD1
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.906
AutoCAD SHX Text
SRD2
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.880
AutoCAD SHX Text
SRD3
AutoCAD SHX Text
66.467
AutoCAD SHX Text
SRD4
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.783
AutoCAD SHX Text
S001
AutoCAD SHX Text
LE
AutoCAD SHX Text
LE
AutoCAD SHX Text
LE
AutoCAD SHX Text
LE
AutoCAD SHX Text
LE
AutoCAD SHX Text
LE
AutoCAD SHX Text
SO
AutoCAD SHX Text
SO
AutoCAD SHX Text
INV
AutoCAD SHX Text
INV
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
60.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
61.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
3BOLE
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.63
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.85
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
IL
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
Dia 0.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
IL
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
Dia 0.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
MIXED TREES
AutoCAD SHX Text
TO HT 18m
AutoCAD SHX Text
Ash
AutoCAD SHX Text
Dia 0.9
AutoCAD SHX Text
Ash
AutoCAD SHX Text
Dia 0.6
AutoCAD SHX Text
Ht 16.0
AutoCAD SHX Text
Deciduous
AutoCAD SHX Text
Dia 0.4
AutoCAD SHX Text
Ht 13.0
AutoCAD SHX Text
Deciduous
AutoCAD SHX Text
Dia 0.6
AutoCAD SHX Text
Ht 15.0
AutoCAD SHX Text
DENSE SCRUB
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.71
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.80
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.91
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.86
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.70
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.26
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.21
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.08
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.14
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.75
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.54
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.69
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.48
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.52
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.36
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.11
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.58
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.82
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.81
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.03
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.66
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.49
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.28
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.64
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.92
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.78
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.10
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.18
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.57
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.32
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.15
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.62
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.33
AutoCAD SHX Text
48.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.60
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.61
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.56
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.59
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.51
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.41
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.99
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.93
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.47
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.44
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.98
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.94
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.89
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.20
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.25
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
50.88
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.34
AutoCAD SHX Text
51.74
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.37
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.84
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.45
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.83
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.06
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.39
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.00
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.19
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.53
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.87
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.02
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.76
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.79
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.72
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.90
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.30
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.01
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.29
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.17
AutoCAD SHX Text
59.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.65
AutoCAD SHX Text
56.07
AutoCAD SHX Text
55.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
54.46
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.73
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
53.04
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.77
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.50
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.24
AutoCAD SHX Text
52.35
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.40
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.27
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.31
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.13
AutoCAD SHX Text
49.16
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.96
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.67
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.68
AutoCAD SHX Text
58.42
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.95
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.55
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.43
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.38
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.22
AutoCAD SHX Text
57.09
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
ACCESS BRIDGE
AutoCAD SHX Text
VIADUCT
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.2M PWF
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.2M PWF
AutoCAD SHX Text
PWF
AutoCAD SHX Text
1.3M POST & WIRE
AutoCAD SHX Text
Deciduous
AutoCAD SHX Text
Dia 1.0
AutoCAD SHX Text
Ht 18.0
AutoCAD SHX Text
DENSE BRAMBLES
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCRUB
AutoCAD SHX Text
HEDGE ROOT LINE
AutoCAD SHX Text
VIADUCT
AutoCAD SHX Text
ARABLE LAND
AutoCAD SHX Text
ARABLE LAND
AutoCAD SHX Text
ARABLE LAND
AutoCAD SHX Text
B4214
AutoCAD SHX Text
B4214
Page 55: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

AP

PE

ND

IX 3

L

eg

al

Op

inio

n

Page 56: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

1

Land North of the Viaduct, Ledbury,

Bloor Homes Western

______________________________

OPINION

______________________________

1. I am instructed by Hunter Page Planning to advise Bloor Homes in

relation to a very recently submitted outline planning application for

the development of land to the north of the Viaduct, Ledbury.

2. The application site is allocated in the recently adopted

Herefordshire Core Strategy. The application proposal comprises a

mixed-use development including the erection of up to 625 homes

(including affordable housing), up to 2.9 hectares of B1 employment

land, land for a canal corridor, public open space (including a linear

park), access, drainage and other works. The application is in

outline, save for means of access to the site. Vehicular access is

proposed off the Bromyard Road.

3. I am asked to advise on various issues relating to policy

requirements concerning the restoration of the Herefordshire and

Gloucestershire Canal.

4. Adopted Core Strategy Policy LB2 is specific to the land north of the

Viaduct. I have not been provided with any material relating to the

background or genesis of the policy but given its appearance in an

up to date Core Strategy I must assume it was fully justified. The

Page 57: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

2

policy states that development proposals in that location will be

expected to bring forward inter alia:

“land and contributions to facilitate a restored canal to be delivered in partnership with the Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal Trust;”

5. In addition, Policy E4 states that “the tourist industry will be

supported by a number of measures including:

“the safeguarding of the historic route of the Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal (shown on the Policies Map), together with its infrastructure, buildings, towpath and features. Where the original alignment cannot be re-established, a corridor allowing for deviations will be safeguarded. New developments within or immediately adjoining the safeguarded corridor will be required to incorporate land for canal restoration. Development not connected with the canal that would prevent or prejudice the restoration of a continuous route will not be permitted.”

6. I am instructed that Bloor Homes has had a number of meetings with

the Canal Trust and has agreed certain matters including the width

and broad alignment of the canal within the site’s red line boundary.

The corridor of land in question is 18m wide and runs along the

western edge of the site. It amounts to approximately 4.5 acres of

land located outside of the River Leadon flood plain and is all net

developable land. As such, it has a land value of around £2m - £3m.

7. The Trust are also seeking that Bloor Homes provide for the

construction of the canal, either through works and/or financial

contributions. I understand that the financial cost to complete the

canal construction through the site is likely to amount to

Page 58: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

3

approximately £2.5m according to the Trust. Bloor Homes propose

to offer a financial contribution towards the works. In addition, I

understand that, when the canal comes forward, it may be possible

to re-route some surface water from the site to the canal to provide

a water source. This would not be required for the operation of the

proposed development but would be a benefit in contributing

towards the operation of the canal and the Trust support this

approach.

8. In addition to the land and contributions, the Trust suggests that the

construction of the new roundabout off the Bromyard Road

(providing vehicular access into the site) and slight realignment of

the Bromyard Road should provide a bridge at the point where the

canal to be created effectively meets the Bromyard Road. This

would be to enable the future extension of the canal to be able to

continue northwards without having to carry out works to the

Bromyard Road in the future. Bloor Homes maintains that the

roundabout works proposed as part of the application are largely

contained within the site on land within Bloor’s control and considers

that there is no policy justification or requirement for providing a road

bridge to connect the canal to third party land.

9. Finally, I understand that the Trust is requesting that the residential

development, including the affordable housing units, should

contribute to the future maintenance of the canal. In this regard, the

Trust relies on a 2009 appeal decision at Holmer Trading Estate in

which an Inspector considered acceptable a s.106 agreement which

included provision for annual contributions of £250.00 per open

market unit towards the “restoration, maintenance and management

Page 59: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

4

of the former route or any subsequent route of the Herefordshire and

Gloucestershire Canal within the city of Hereford.”

Opinion

10. I am asked for my opinion on the following issues:

(i) What is the correct interpretation of Policy LB2 regarding the

‘contributions’ proposed to facilitate the restoration of the

canal?

(ii) How should an ‘appropriate level of contribution(s)’ to be made

by Bloor Homes to facilitate a restored canal through the site

be calculated?

(iii) Does the Core Strategy policy wording require the

construction of a road bridge to enable the canal to cross the

Bromyard Road into third party land at a future date?

(iv) Does the policy wording suggest a requirement for future

financial contributions from occupiers of the new homes

towards the on-going maintenance costs of the canal?

Before dealing with these questions in turn, I bear in mind the

relevant legal principles:

11. Interpretation of policy is a matter of law for the courts. Policy

must be interpreted objectively but always in its proper context:

“The development plan is a carefully drafted and considered statement of policy, published in order to inform the public of the approach which will be followed by planning authorities in decision-making unless there is good reason to depart from it. It is intended to guide the behaviour of developers and planning authorities. As in

Page 60: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

5

other areas of administrative law, the policies which it sets out are designed to secure consistency and direction in the exercise of discretionary powers, while allowing a measure of flexibility to be retained. Those considerations point away from the view that the meaning of the plan is in principle a matter which each planning authority is entitled to determine from time to time as it pleases, within the limits of rationality. On the contrary, these considerations suggest that in principle, in this area of public administration as in others … policy statements should be interpreted objectively in accordance with the language used, read as always in its proper context.” per Lord Reed in Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council (ASDA Stores Ltd intervening) [2012] UKSC 13 (at para 18)

12. But, it is important to distinguish between matters of

interpretation (which are for the courts) and matters of application

which are matters of planning judgement for the decision maker:

“judges are entitled to look to applicants, seeking to rely on matters of planning policy in applications to quash planning decisions (at local or appellate level), to distinguish clearly between issues of interpretation of policy, appropriate for judicial analysis, and issues of judgement in the application of that policy; and not to elide the two.” (per Lord Carnwath in Suffolk Coastal District Council (Appellant) v HopkinsHomes Ltd and another (Respondents) Richborough Estates Partnership LLP and another (Respondents) vCheshire East Borough Council (Appellant) [2017] UKSC 37, at para

26).

13. Regulation 122(2) of the Community Infrastructure Levy

Regulations 2010 states:

“A planning obligation may only constitute a reason for granting

planning permission for the development if the obligation is:

a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning

terms;

Page 61: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

6

b) directly related to the development; and

c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the

development.”

14. This provision reflects, and enshrines in law, the policy tests

for planning obligations found in paragraph 204 of the NPPF. The

effect is that the above tests are now legal requirements and go

beyond what was previously only policy advice (see Gilbart J in R

(oao Working Title Films Limited v. Westminster CC and Moxon St

Residential [2016] EWHC 1855 (Admin), at paras 20 to 22 and R

(oao Hampton Bishop PC0 v. Herefordshire Council [2014] EWCA

Civ 878 at para 49).

15. However, whilst the tests are legal requirements that must be

addressed, the question of whether or not a particular obligation

meets these tests is primarily a question of planning judgement for

the decision maker (see para 25 of Working Title Films).

16. With these principles in mind, I address the questions posed

in turn below:

(1) What is the correct interpretation of Policy LB2 regarding the

‘contributions’ proposed to facilitate the restoration of the canal?

17. I consider that, correctly interpreted, Policy LB2 requires

contributions in addition to land, but the level of contributions

required is to ‘facilitate’ and not ‘deliver’ a restored canal. I agree

with those instructing me that the term ‘facilitate’ means ‘to make

Page 62: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

7

(an action or process) easy or easier’. This means that the Policy

does not require the developer to pay the full cost of delivering the

restored canal across its land. But it does require some material

contribution towards that goal in order that the delivery of a restored

canal is made materially easier by the contribution. If the delivery of

the canal or that section running through the site was required I

would expect to see that clearly set out bearing in mind the

substantial sums involved.

(2) How should an ‘appropriate level of contribution(s)’ to be made

by Bloor homes to facilitate a restored canal through the site be

calculated?

18. In accordance with regulation 122(2) of the Community

Infrastructure Regulations 2010 and para 204 of the NPPF, the

contribution must be ‘necessary’ to make the proposal acceptable

in planning terms, must be ‘directly related to the development’ and

must be ‘fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the

development.’ What the level of contribution should be to meet

these requirements is a matter of planning judgement but, it seems

to me that a contribution set at a level to deliver full construction

(rather than merely facilitation) of the restored canal would not, in

the light of the wording of the policy, be ‘necessary’ to meet the

policy requirement and so would not be ‘necessary to make the

proposal acceptable in planning terms’.

19. In my view, the level of the contribution should be calculated

by reference to the cost of a reasonable, proportionate programme

of works that would contribute towards the construction of the

Page 63: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

8

restored canal along the land corridor to be provided by Bloor, and

would thereby “facilitate” the restoration of the canal. I agree that

calculating the contribution by reference to the cost of undertaking

the works to excavate a linear depression (say 1m deep) along an

agreed section of the canal corridor within the site and removing the

soil/spoil off site would appear to meet the test of being fairly and

reasonably related to the development, so long as that level of

contribution would not threaten the viability of the development once

the provision of the corridor of land was also taken into account.

(3) Does the Core Strategy policy wording require the construction

of a road bridge to enable the canal to cross the Bromyard Road

into third party land at a future date?

20. The short answer to this question is “no”. Policy LB2 requires

land and contributions only and would be met by the provision of a

land corridor through the site as proposed by Bloor, together with a

contribution calculated along the lines set out above.

21. Policy E4 requires that a canal corridor be safeguarded and

that new developments within or immediately adjoining the

safeguarded corridor will be required to incorporate land for canal

restoration. Again, the Bloor proposal meets this policy requirement

by the provision of a land corridor through the site.

22. Policy E4 also requires that development that would prevent

or prejudice the restoration of a continuous route will not be

permitted. There is no suggestion in this case that the Bloor

proposal would in any way obstruct the route of the canal, so again

Page 64: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

9

there is no conflict with this element of policy. Indeed, the proposal

would facilitate the restoration rather than prejudice it.

23. So far as I am aware there is no other policy requirement in

the Core Strategy that could be interpreted so as to require the

construction of a road bridge to enable the canal to cross a highway

outside the site and to continue into third party land. Indeed, it

seems to me that any such requirement would be contrary to

s.122(2) as not being directly related to the development, and not

being reasonably and fairly related in scale and kind to the

development. In any case, given that there is no policy requirement

to this effect, a planning obligation in these terms would be contrary

to reg122(2) as it would not be “necessary” to make the proposal

acceptable in planning terms.

(4) Does the policy wording suggest a requirement for future

financial contributions from occupiers of the new homes towards

the on-going maintenance of the canal?

24. Again, the short answer to this question is “no”. The only

financial contributions required by policy are to facilitate the delivery

of a restored canal. There is no requirement that contributions be

made towards its ongoing maintenance. The Trust’s reliance on the

Holmer appeal decision does not change this. First, the appeal

decision is dated 2009, when a different policy and legal framework

was in place: apart from anything else, at that time regulation 122(2)

was not in force. Second, and perhaps more importantly, in that

appeal decision, the inspector was not asked to consider, and in fact

did not consider, the legitimacy or reasonableness of the canal

Page 65: PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF GUY WAKEFIELD MRTPI FOR LAND …

10

maintenance contributions in the s.106. Only the contributions

towards restoration and transfer are mentioned in the decision (see

paras 5 and 18 of the decision). The ongoing maintenance

contributions are not specifically mentioned anywhere in the

decision letter and the appeal decision provides no authority for the

proposition that such contributions would be reasonable or

necessary.

25. I have addressed the questions raised in my instructions.

Should any further questions arise, I would be pleased to deal with

them in any convenient way.

9 June 2017