promises and pitfalls - cieem study –surat gas project 10 ... backed by science landscape-scale...
TRANSCRIPT
Presentation Overview
Overview of legislative framework for biodiversity offsetting in QLD
Australian Government Environmental Offsets Policy
Queensland Government Offset Policies
Offset triggers
Challenges and opportunities
Offset metric vs. proposed UK formula for biodiversity units
Scale-ability
Incorporating offset assessments into project approvals process
Stakeholder engagement
Managing and protecting offsets
1
Australian Government
Environmental Offsets Policy
EPBC Act Environmental Offsets Policy was updated in October 2012
Applies to projects that impact on matters of national environmental significance
Broad offset principles:
like for like
improve condition of vegetation or habitat
reduce risk of loss (weeds, feral animals, fire)
be of a size and scale proportionate to the level of impact (determined through a calculator tool)
account for and manage risks
legally secure offset for at least duration of impact
be readily measured, monitored, audited and enforced
2
Federal Offset Triggers
3
Federal triggers
World Heritage Areas
National Heritage Places
Great Barrier Reef
Threatened flora and fauna
Threatened ecological
communities
Migratory species
Queensland Offset Policies
4
Marine FishHabitat
Koala Habitat VegetationManagement
Biodiversity
Issue-Specific Offset Policies
Queensland Government Environmental Offsets Policy
Challenges - Scale
9
The scale of impacts can vary significantly.
Small scale (<2ha) up to large scale (>1,000ha)
Can an offset policy effectively deal with large offsets as opposed to
small offsets?
A complex assessment process may cost a similar amount to assess a
small project vs a large million dollar project.
For large scale projects challenges include the size of offsets needed
may be significant, and they are also likely to have multiple values
needing to be assessed.
Are there suitable offsets available?
Case Study – Surat Gas Project
10
Case study – coal seam gas project
Covers an area of 6,100 km2
Proposed to install 6,500 wells
Includes numerous pipelines between wells and gas processing stations
Each well clearing area is 10m by 5m
Covers a wide range of landscapes from cropping to grazing and large
tracts of forest.
Stakeholder Engagement
In delivering a biodiversity offset there are a range of stakeholders:
1. Env Professionals
Assess biodiversity impacts
Identify avoidance and mitigation measures
2. Offset Brokers
Identify suitable offset delivery options
Apply metrics
Liaise with landholders
Facilitate agreements between parties
Prepare offset management plans
3. Landholder
Provide the offset
May also undertake management actions
14
Stakeholder Engagement
4. Community/Catchment Groups
Participate in locating offset sites
Undertake management actions
5. Government
Set the policy
Provide support to applicants in applying the policy requirements
Approve the offset documentation
Audit and check compliance the offset requirements are being met.
Developers
Understand the policy and why they are offsetting
What are the options and costs?
Fund the offset
Bring about positive environmental gains
Support local communities
15
Management and Protection of
Offsets
Offsets need to be actively managed.
Offset benefits need to be protected from future
threats.
The offset should be legally protected and
binding on current and future landowners.
Qld has range of options that may include:
Voluntary declaration
Nature refuge agreement
Covenant
Protected area estate.
16
Positive Outcomes from Biodiversity
Offsetting
Diversifying income for rural landholders
Encouraging sustainable land management practices
Community-driven conservation outcomes backed by science
Landscape-scale conservation benefits
Offsets are encouraging avoidance. Developers are starting to consider the cost of offsets up-front in project planning
More certainty for developers and landholders providing offsets when there is a clear offset framework
17