Document Format Revision (7/20/15)

SCOPE OF WORK

Feasibility Study

Department of Transportation Proposed Winter Yard Borough of Florham Park, Morris County, N.J.

PROJECT NO. T0563-01

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Honorable Chris Christie, Governor Honorable Kim Guadagno, Lt. Governor

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Ford M. Scudder, Acting Treasurer

DIVISION OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION

Steven Sutkin, Director

Date: August 15, 2016

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE

I. OBJECTIVE .......................................................................................... 4

II. CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS ................................................ 4

III. PROJECT SCHEDULE ....................................................................... 5

A. SCOPE OF WORK FEASIBILITY SCHEDULE .......................................................................... 5 B. PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHEDULE ................................................................ 5 C. APPROVED FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHEDULE ...................................................................... 5

IV. PROJECT SITE LOCATION & TEAM MEMBERS ...................... 6

A. PROJECT SITE ADDRESS ........................................................................................................... 6 B. PROJECT TEAM MEMBER DIRECTORY ................................................................................. 6

1. DPMC Representative: ............................................................................................................... 6 2. Client Agency Representative: ................................................................................................... 6

V. PROJECT DEFINITION ..................................................................... 7

A. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 7 B. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF THE Site .............................................................................. 7

1. Fabric Covered Salt Structure: .................................................................................................... 7 2. Truck Scale: ................................................................................................................................ 7 3. Scale House:................................................................................................................................ 8 4. Storage Building: ........................................................................................................................ 8 5. Emergency Power Generator: ..................................................................................................... 8 6. Environmental Review: .............................................................................................................. 8 7. Historic Screening:...................................................................................................................... 8

VI. FEASIBILITY STUDY RESPONSIBILITIES .................................. 9

A. PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT AND IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................... 9 1. General: ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Site Survey: ................................................................................................................................. 9 3. Proposed Site Layout: ................................................................................................................. 9 4. Site Improvements: ................................................................................................................... 10

B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ........................................................................... 10 C. NEW JERSEY NO NET LOSS REFORESTATION ACT ......................................................... 10 D. PERMITS & APPROVALS ......................................................................................................... 11 E. PROPOSED PROJECT COSTS AND ESTIMATES .................................................................. 11

1. Proposed Project Costs ............................................................................................................. 11 2. Professional Cost Estimator ...................................................................................................... 11

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 3

F. PROPOSED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ................................................... 12 G. FEASIBILITY STUDY MEETINGS & PRESENTATIONS ...................................................... 12

1. Feasibility Study Meetings: ...................................................................................................... 12 2. Feasibility Study Presentations: ................................................................................................ 12

VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ........................................................ 13

A. SCOPE CHANGES ...................................................................................................................... 13

VIII. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS .................................................... 13

A. CONTRACT DELIVERABLES .................................................................................................. 13 B. PROJECT DOCUMENT BOOKLET .......................................................................................... 13

IX. SOW SIGNATURE APPROVAL SHEET ....................................... 14

X. CONTRACT DELIVERABLES ....................................................... 15

XI. EXHIBITS ............................................................................................ 17

A. SAMPLE PROJECT SCHEDULE FORMAT B. LOCATION MAP C. SITE MAP D. EXAMPLE - FABRIC COVERED SALT STRUCTURE E. EXAMPLE – TRUCK SCALE

F. EXAMPLE – TRUCK SCALE BUILDING G. EXAMPLE – STORAGE BUILDING

H. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW I. PHOTOS

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 4

I. OBJECTIVE

The objective of this project is to conduct a Feasibility Study for the New Jersey Department of Transportation’s proposed Florham Park Winter Yard. The yard would consist of a fabric covered salt storage structure to store up to 50,000 tons of road de-icing salt, a truck scale and associated operator house, a four-bay storage building and a generator to back-up the entire site. This study shall determine and identify all pertinent and/or applicable issues affecting the proposed construction. It shall include a proposed site layout, cost estimates and preparation of an environmental impact statement.

II. CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS A. CONSULTANT & SUB-CONSULTANT PRE-QUALIFICATIONS

The Consultant shall be a firm pre-qualified with the Division of Property Management & Construction (DPMC) in the following discipline(s):

• P001 Architecture

The Consultant shall also have in-house capabilities or Sub-Consultants pre-qualified with DPMC in:

• P002 Electrical Engineering • P005 Civil Engineering • P009 Soils Engineering • P011 Environmental Engineering • P015 Land Surveying • P025 Estimating/ Cost Analysis

As well as, any and all other Architectural, Engineering and Specialty Disciplines necessary to complete the project as described in this Scope of Work (SOW).

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 5

III. PROJECT SCHEDULE

A. SCOPE OF WORK FEASIBILITY SCHEDULE The following schedule identifies the estimated study phases for this project and the estimated durations.

PROJECT PHASE ESTIMATED DURATION (Calendar Days) 1. Site Access Approvals & Schedule Design Kick-off Meeting 14 2. Preliminary Draft Feasibility Study & Presentation 90

• Project Team Review & Comment 21 3. Final Draft Feasibility Study & Presentation 60

• Project Team Review & Comment 21 4. Final Feasibility Study & Presentation 30

B. PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHEDULE The Consultant shall submit a bar chart schedule with their technical proposal that is similar in format and detail to the schedule depicted in Exhibit ‘A’. The bar chart schedule developed by the Consultant shall reflect their recommended project phases, phase activities, and durations.

A written narrative shall also be included with the technical proposal explaining the schedule submitted and the reasons why and how it can be completed in the time frame proposed by the Consultant. This schedule and narrative will be reviewed by the Consultant Selection Committee as part of the evaluation process and will be assigned a score commensurate with clarity and comprehensiveness of the submission.

C. APPROVED FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHEDULE The Consultant shall issue the approved project Feasibility Study schedule at the first kickoff meeting. This schedule will be binding for the Consultant’s activities and will include the start and completion dates for each activity. The Consultant and Project Team members shall use this schedule to ensure that all milestone dates are being met for the project. The Consultant shall update the schedule to reflect performance periodically (minimally at each study phase) for the Project Team review and approval. Any recommendations for deviations from the approved

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 6

design schedule must be explained in detail as to the causes for the deviation(s) and impact to the overall project schedule.

IV. PROJECT SITE LOCATION & TEAM MEMBERS

A. PROJECT SITE ADDRESS The location of the project site is:

NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Salt Storage Site Route 24, Mile Post 5.6 Florham Park, NJ

See Exhibit ‘B’ and ‘C’ for the project site location.

B. PROJECT TEAM MEMBER DIRECTORY The following are the names, addresses, and phone numbers of the Project Team members. 1. DPMC Representative: Name: Ed Hedger, Project Manager Address: Division Property Management & Construction 20 West State Street, 3rd Floor Trenton, NJ 08608-1206 Phone No: (609) 984-6238 E-Mail No: Ed.Hedger@treas.nj.gov 2. Client Agency Representative: Name: Dennis Meszaros, Client Project Manager Address: Department of Transportation 1035 Parkway Avenue Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Phone No: (609) 530-3770 E-Mail No: Dennis.Meszaros@dot.nj.gov

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 7

V. PROJECT DEFINITION

A. BACKGROUND The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) maintains an existing salt storage capacity of about 165,000 tons. For a typical 24 hour winter event, the NJDOT uses about 19,800 tons, or 12 percent, of their salt inventory. This means that the NJDOT can handle about 8 winter events without salt replenishment. It takes about 3 to 5 days to replenish the salt from one event. Recent winters have had as many as 26 winter events. Salt inventories have, at times, been dangerously low and obtaining more salt from other sources has been a challenge. As a result, the NJDOT created a plan to build salt storage depots at three sites to ensure a reliable supply of salt for the north, central and south regions of the state. Each site will store up to 50,000 tons of salt and almost double the existing storage capacity. This project will examine the feasibility of constructing a salt storage depot for the northern region along Route 24 in Florham Park. The site is at the location of an abandoned clover leaf interchange with a road once named Tri-Borough Road that was going to be part of the southern extension of the Eisenhower Parkway. It was cleared and graded in the 1970’s but construction stopped due to environmental and budgetary concerns. There is a bridge that may be usable to facilitate access to the north and southbound sides of Route 24. See Exhibit ‘B’ and ‘C’ for the project site location.

B. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE 1. Fabric Covered Salt Structure:

The NJDOT is proposing to construct a fabric covered structure at the site capable of storing up to 50,000 tons of salt. A fabric covered structure that stores 8,000 tons of salt has been built at the NJDOT West Trenton Maintenance Yard and is shown in Exhibit ‘D’ as an example. 2. Truck Scale:

The above-ground scale system shall be 11 feet wide by 70 feet long and utilize hydrostatic load cells for weighing. The scale system shall be constructed on concrete piers to elevate it off of the ground so that it can be cleaned underneath. The area under the scale shall also contain a concrete slab for easy cleaning. Concrete approach ramps shall be constructed before and after the scale system with a 10 foot minimum flat concrete transition area between the top edge of the ramp and the scale. See Exhibit ‘E’ for an example.

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 8

3. Scale House: The above-ground scale system shall also include a scale house for the truck scale operators and scale equipment. The scale house shall be a permanent structure with electricity, heat and rest room facilities. See Exhibit ‘F’ for an example. 4. Storage Building: The storage building shall be a four-bay structure with a minimum width of 60 feet and a minimum depth of 44 feet. This building will be used for the storage of two loaders and some garage work space. See Exhibit ‘G’ for an example. 5. Emergency Power Generator:

An emergency power generator to back-up the entire facility, including new lighting and other electrical equipment will be required. The new emergency generator shall be in an environmentally safe enclosure. 6. Environmental Review: The DOT conducted an environmental review, including wetlands, flood hazard, historical constraints, threatened and endangered species, and storm water management of the site. See Exhibit ‘H’. There appears to be wetlands within the center of each cloverleaf. An Environmental Impact Statement will be required as per Executive Order No. 215. 7. Historic Screening:

The site has been screened by DOT using GIS data obtained from NJDEP’s website. The site was screened for the presence of historic fill, historic properties, historic districts, and archaeological sites. Based upon review of NJDEP’s current GIS data, there are no historic properties, historic districts, or archaeological sites within the boundaries of, or immediately adjacent to the proposed locations of the salt structure. The proposed location is, however, situated within a large area of historic fill. The Historic Maps Layer indicates the area was once covered by wetlands. The fill was likely placed in order to level the ground during roadway construction. According to the NJDEP GIS website, “…historic fill is non-indigenous material placed on a site in order to raise the topographic elevation of the site. No representation is made as to the composition of the fill or presence of contamination in the fill.” Due to the unknown composition of the fill and the potential presence of contamination, soil sampling is recommended. See Exhibit ‘I’ for site photos.

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 9

VI. FEASIBILITY STUDY RESPONSIBILITIES

A. PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT AND IMPROVEMENTS

1. General: The Consultant shall conduct a feasibility study to determine and identify all pertinent and/or applicable issues affecting the proposed construction. The study shall include possible locations for these functions, circulation patterns, identify all necessary site improvements and provide cost estimates. The Consultant shall conduct interviews with the Client Agency to fully understand the site operations and required circulation pattern. The Consultant shall provide a proposed site layout identifying where the improvements can be located based on the information obtained from the site investigation and Agency interviews.

2. Site Survey: Conduct all necessary surveys on both sides of Route 24 including, but not limited to: topographical, utilities, high water line, floodplain delineation, wetlands delineation and any, and all, other features necessary to obtain all required approvals. Obtain all field measurements and record all data necessary to provide an accurate boundary survey to determine the property lines of the site. Show datum, benchmark, and north arrow in relation to the property lines. Benchmarks must be well defined and described. Determine the extent of any easements or encroachments and show the limitations imposed on the property by the State or Local regulations. Include in the survey the bridge over Route 24 and Route 24 itself where appropriate for ingress and egress information. Include any utility and storm drainage structures previously placed onsite. 3. Proposed Site Layout: The Consultant shall determine the buildable footprint. Determine the size and dimensions required for a fabric covered salt structure with the capability of storing up to 50,000 tons of salt. See Exhibit ‘D’ for an example. The salt storage structure, scale and scale house, storage building and generator shall be located on a proposed site layout. Different options may be presented. The Consultant shall explore all possibilities to accommodate the Client’s needs. Should the construction of a new facility not be possible due to site restrictions or other factors, then

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 10

modifications to the size and storage capacity of the salt storage structure may be suggested. The Consultant shall provide construction cost estimates for all recommendations. 4. Site Improvements:

The Consultant shall identify all site improvements required to achieve the proposed site layout including, but not limited to, earthwork, parking areas, access roads, utilities and tree removal (See NJ No Net Loss Reforestation Act requirements below).

B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Using the proposed site layout, the Consultant shall prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with Executive Order (EO) No. 215, dated September 11, 1989. Executive Order No. 215 is available at: http://www.nj.gov/dep/enforcement/opppc/reports/exec215.pdf The EIS is expected to include wetland delineation and a Letter of Interpretation, flood hazard area jurisdictional determination and an assessment of threatened and endangered species, cultural and historic resources. However, the final scope of the Environmental Impact Statement and the submission/approval requirements should be discussed between the Consultant and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to initiation. The EIS shall be completed and submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). As required by EO No. 215, Consultant shall provide a written response to DEP recommendations and shall participate in resolving any recommendations that are in dispute. All costs associated with the preparation of the EIS, response to recommendations and participation in resolving disputes shall be included in the Consultant’s lump sum fee proposal. Six (6) bound copies of the approved DEP Environmental Impact Statement shall be submitted to the DPMC Project Manager for distribution.

C. NEW JERSEY NO NET LOSS REFORESTATION ACT

On January 29, 2002 the Department of Environmental Protection issued the NJ No Net Loss Reforestation Act P.L. 1993, c.106 (C.13:1L-14.2) that requires all state entities that deforest a half-acre or more of forested land fall under the act and reforestation plans will be mandatory.

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 11

In the event that a project proposes the removal of more than a half-acre of trees, the Consultant shall provide a plan to comply with provisions of the NJ No Net Loss Reforestation Act. The Consultant shall estimate the costs associated with design, tree surveying, and construction administration services necessary to comply with this Act and include them in their estimate as a line item entitled “NJ No Net Loss Reforestation Act Costs.”

D. PERMITS & APPROVALS

The Consultant shall identify any, and all, permits and approvals which may be required for this project including all Federal, State, Local Agencies and Authorities having jurisdiction including, but not limited to: NJ Department of Agriculture: Soil Erosion; NJ Department of Community Affairs: UCC Permit for Building Construction; NJ Department of Environmental Protection: Equipment Emissions, Environmental Impact Statement (CCE in excess of $5 m & 5 acres), Wetlands Development Permit, No Net Loss Reforestation Act, etc. The Consultant shall provide their professional opinion of “how likely” it will be that these approvals might be obtained, estimated costs and timeframes.

E. PROPOSED PROJECT COSTS AND ESTIMATES

1. Proposed Project Costs The Consultant shall determine the construction cost estimate (CCE) and current working estimate (CWE) for the facility improvements described in the Feasibility Study. Project cost items shall include, but not limited to: construction costs, Consultant design and construction administration fees, testing costs, affirmative action, DPMC management fees, contingencies, permits, allowances, and escalation factors for the anticipated construction year of the facility improvements. 2. Professional Cost Estimator The Consultant or Sub-Consultant providing the cost estimates must be pre-qualified with DPMC in the Estimating/Cost Analysis Specialty Discipline. All cost estimates shall be adjusted for regional location, site factors, construction phasing, building use groups, location of work within the building, temporary swing space, security issues, and inflation factors based on the year in which the work is to be performed. All cost estimates must be submitted on a DPMC-38 Project Cost Analysis form for each improvement recommended with a detailed construction cost analysis in CSI format for all appropriate divisions and sub-divisions.

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 12

F. PROPOSED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The Consultant shall submit a project design and construction bar chart schedule with their final draft assessment study that is similar in format and detail to the schedule depicted in Exhibit ‘A’. The bar chart schedule developed by the Consultant shall reflect their recommended project phases, phase activities, activity durations.

G. FEASIBILITY STUDY MEETINGS & PRESENTATIONS

1. Feasibility Study Meetings: Conduct the appropriate number of review meetings with the Project Team members and NJDOT Environmental Group during each study phase of the project so they may determine if the project meets their requirements, question any aspect of the contract deliverables, and make changes where appropriate. The Consultant shall describe the philosophy and process used in the development of the study criteria and the various alternatives considered to meet the project objectives. Selected studies, sketches, cost estimates, schedules, and other relevant information shall be presented to support the study and solutions proposed. Record the minutes of each design meeting and distribute within five (5) calendar days to all attendees and those persons specified to be on the distribution list by the Project Manager. 2. Feasibility Study Presentations: The minimum number of study presentations required for each phase of this project is identified below for reference: Feasibility Study Kick-Off Meeting/ Presentation

Preliminary Draft Feasibility Study: One (1) oral presentation with submission at phase completion. Final Draft Feasibility Study: One (1) oral presentation with submission at phase completion. Final Feasibility Study: One (1) oral presentation with submission at report completion.

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 13

VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

A. SCOPE CHANGES The Consultant must request any changes to this Scope of Work in writing. An approved DPMC 9d Consultant Amendment Request form reflecting authorized scope changes must be received by the Consultant prior to undertaking any additional work. The DPMC 9d form must be approved and signed by the Director of DPMC and written authorization issued from the Project Manager prior to any work being performed by the Consultant. Any work performed without the executed DPMC 9d form is done at the Consultant’s own financial risk.

VIII. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

A. CONTRACT DELIVERABLES All submissions shall include the Contract Deliverables identified in Section X of this Scope of Work and described in the DPMC Procedures for Architects and Engineers Manual.

B. PROJECT DOCUMENT BOOKLET

The Consultant shall submit all of the required Contract Deliverables to the Project Manager at the completion of each phase of the project. All reports, meeting minutes, project team comments, project schedule, cost estimate in CSI format (2004 Edition), correspondence, calculations, and other appropriate items identified on the Submission Checklist form provided in the A/E Manual shall be presented in an 8½” x 11” bound “booklet” format.

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 15

X. CONTRACT DELIVERABLES PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE:

6.1 Project Schedule (Bar Chart Format) 6.2 Meetings & Minutes (Minutes within five (5) calendar days of meeting) 6.3 Correspondence

6.4 Submission Requirements 6.4.1 A/E Statement of Site Visit 6.4.3 Special Features Description 6.4.4 Site Evaluation 6.4.5 Borings, Surveys, and Soils Analysis 6.4.8 Identify Regulatory Agency Approvals 6.4.8.1 NJ Department of Agriculture (a) Local Soil Conservation District (land disturbance over 5000 s.f.) 6.4.8.2 NJ Department of Community Affairs (a) UCC Permit for Building Construction 6.4.8.3 NJ Department of Environmental Protection (a) Equipment Emissions (b) Environmental Impact Statement (CCE in excess of $5 m & 5 acres) (c) Wetlands Development Permit 6.4.9 Utility Availability for: Sanitary Service Storm Water Domestic Water Gas Service Electric Service Telephone Service 6.4.10 Drawings: 6 sets Cover Sheet (See A/E Manual for format) Existing Site Plan Existing Site Utility Plan 6.4.12 Proposed Construction Cost Estimate in CSI Format & Cost Analysis 38 Form 6.4.13 Bar Chart of Proposed Design and Construction Schedule 6.4.14 Oral Presentation of Submission to Project Team 6.4.15 SOW Compliance Statement 6.4.16 This Submission Checklist (See A/E Manual, Figure 6.4.16 for format) 6.4.17 Deliverables Submission in Booklet Form: 7 sets

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 16

6.5 Approval 6.5.1 Respond to Submission Comments FINAL DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY 7.1 Project Schedule (Update Bar Chart Schedule) 7.2 Meetings & Minutes (Minutes within five (5) calendar days of meeting) 7.3 Correspondence 7.4 Submission Requirements 7.4.1 A/E Statement of Site Visit 7.4.3 Special Features Description 7.4.4 Site Evaluation 7.4.5 Borings, Surveys, and Soils Analysis 7.4.8 Regulatory Agency Approvals (See Section 6.4.8 for listing) 7.4.9 Confirm Utility Availability (On Site & Public) 7.4.10 Drawings: 6 sets Cover Sheet (See A/E Manual for format) Existing Site Plan Existing Site Utility Plan Proposed Site Layout 7.4.12 Proposed Construction Cost Estimate in CSI Format & Cost Analysis 38 Form 7.4.13 Bar Chart of Proposed Design and Construction Schedule 7.4.14 Oral Presentation of Submission to Project Team 7.4.15 SOW Compliance Statement 7.4.16 This Submission Checklist (See A/E Manual, Figure 6.4.16 for format) 7.4.17 Deliverables Submission in Booklet Form: 7 sets 7.5 Approval 7.5.1 Respond to Submission Comments 7.6 Submission Forms Figure 7.4.12 Current Working Estimate/Cost Analysis Figure 7.4.16 Submission Checklist

PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study PROJECT LOCATION: NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Winter Yard PROJECT NO: T0563-01 DATE: August 15, 2016

PAGE 17

FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDY 8.1 Schedule (Update Bar Chart Schedule) 8.2 Meeting & Minutes (Minutes within five (5) calendar days of meeting) 8.3 Correspondence 8.4 Submission Requirements 8.4.1 A/E Statement of Site Visit 8.4.3 Special Features Description 8.4.4 Site Evaluation 8.4.5 Borings, Surveys, Soils Analysis 8.4.6. Fine Arts Inclusion 8.4.7 Framed Rendering and Photographs 8.4.8 Regulatory Agency Approvals (Include itemized list specific to this project) 8.4.10 Drawings: 6 sets 8.4.12 Current Working Estimate in CSI Format & Cost Analysis 38 Form 8.4.13 Bar Chart of Design and Construction Schedule 8.4.14 Oral Presentation of this Submission to Project Team 8.4.15 Plan Review/SOW Compliance Statement 8.4.16 This Submission Checklist 8.4.17 Final Report Submission including: plans, findings, etc., in Booklet Form and Digitally on Compact Disc: 7 copies 8.5 Approvals 8.5.1 Respond to Submission Comments

XI. EXHIBITS The attached exhibits in this section will include a sample project schedule, and any supporting documentation to assist the Consultant in the design of the project such as maps, drawings, photographs, floor plans, studies, reports, etc.

END OF SCOPE OF WORK

February 7, 1997Rev.: January 29, 2002

Responsible Group Code Table

The codes below are used in the schedule field “GRP” that identifies the group responsible for theactivity. The table consists of groups in the Division of Property Management & Construction(DPMC), as well as groups outside of the DPMC that have responsibility for specific activities ona project that could delay the project if not completed in the time specified. For reportingpurposes, the groups within the DPMC have been defined to the supervisory level ofmanagement (Le., third level of management, the level below the Associate Director) to identifythe “functional group” responsible for the activity.

CODE DESCRIPTION REPORTS TO ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF:

CM Contract Management Group Contract Management

CA Client Agency N/A

CSP Consultant Selection and Technical ServicesPrequalification Group

NE Architect/Engineer N/A

PR Plan Review Group Technical Services

CP Construction Procurement Planning & Administration

CON Construction Contractor N/A

FM Financial Management Group Planning & Administration

OEU Office of Energy and N/AUtility Management

PD Project Development Group Planning & Administration

EXHIBIT ‘A’

Page 1 of 4

Act

ivity

Ix

tesc

ar.p

ti.n

ii,,

ni

,,,,u.in,,,,,

i,a

it,i

pi.

agn.

;..itu.n

.ii

i.

iiii

,i

in.

mii

i...

..

ii.

Iq

uin

tnin

imi

IH

tiii

.,.u

i.p..

.ini

,nni,

nrn

ii,.in

.ni

ii

h Des

CV

3)l

Sche

dule

/Con

duct

Predesign/P

roject

Kic

kO

ffM

tgC

M

CV

3020

Prep

are

Program

Phas

eSu

bmitt

alA

E

CV

3021

Dis

trib

ute

Prog

ram

Subm

ittal

for

Rev

iew

CM

CV

3OZI

Prep

are

&Su

bmit

Prbj

ect

Cos

t Analy

sis

(DPM

C38

)C

M

CV

3022

Rev

iew

&A

pprove

Program

Subm

ittal

CA

CV

3023

Revie

w&

Approve

Program

Subm

ittal

PR

CVSO

24R

evie

w&

Approve

Program

Subm

ittal

CM

CV

3025

Con

solid

ate

&R

etur

nPr

ogra

mSu

bmitt

alC

omm

ents

CM

CV

3030

Prep

are

Sche

mat

icPh

ase

Subm

ittal

AE

CV

3031

Dis

trib

ute

Sche

mat

icSu

bmitt

alfo

rR

evie

wC

M

CV

3037

Prep

are

&Su

bmit

Proj

ect

Cos

tAna

lysi

s(D

PMC

38)

CM

CVSO

3ZR

evie

w&

App

rove

Sche

mat

icSu

bmitt

alC

A

CV

3033

Rev

iew

&A

ppro

veSc

hem

atic

Subm

ittal

PR

Rev

iew

&A

ppro

veSc

hem

atic

Subm

ittal

CM

CV

3035

Con

solid

ate

&R

etur

nSc

hem

atic

Subm

ittal

Com

men

tC

M

CV

3040

Pre

pare

Des

ignD

evel

opm

entP

hase

Sub

mit

tal

AE

CV3O

S1D

istr

ibut

eD

DSu

bmitt

alfo

rR

evie

wC

M

C’O

47Pr

epar

e&

Subm

itPr

ojec

tCos

t Ana

lysi

s(D

PMC

38)

CM

CV

3042

Rev

iew

&A

ppro

veD

esig

nD

evel

opm

ent S

ubm

ittal

CA

CV

3043

Rev

iew

&A

ppro

veD

esig

nD

evel

opm

ent S

ubm

ittal

PRC

’130

44R

evie

w&

App

rove

Des

ign

Dev

elop

men

tSu

bmitt

alC

MCV

SO45

Con

solj

date

&R

etum

DD

.Sub

mit

talC

omm

ents

CM

Prep

are

Fina

lD

esig

nPh

ase

Subm

ittal

AE

CV3O

SID

istr

ibut

eFi

nal

Des

ign

Subm

ittal

for

Rev

iew

CM

CV

3052

Rev

iew

&A

ppro

veFi

nal

Des

ign

Subm

ittal

CA

CV

3053

Rev

iew

&A

ppro

veFi

nal

Des

ign

Subm

ittal

PRC

V30

54R

evie

wFi

nal

Des

ign

Subm

itifo

rC

onst

ruct

abili

tyO

CS

:N

OT

E:

DB

cA.T

FS

TS

heti

of3

Ref

erto

sect

ion

“IV

Pro

ject

Sch

edul

e”of

the

Bur

eau

ofD

esig

n&

Con

stru

ctio

nS

ervi

ces

Sco

peof

Work

for

contr

act

phas

edu

rati

ons.

Rou

tine

Pro

ject

IX

h1b

it‘

iS0

Prl

mav

era

Sys

tem

s,In

c.

Page 2 of 4

Act

ivit

y.

II)

L)e

seri

pti

on

‘R

evie

w&

App

rove

Fina

lD

esig

nSu

bmitt

alC

M

‘3

0C

onso

lidat

e&

Ret

urn

Fina

lDes

ign

Com

men

tsC

M

Prep

are

&Su

bmit

Perm

itA

pplic

atio

nD

ocum

ents

AE

CV

3068

Prep

are

&Su

bmit

Bid

ding

Cos

tAna

lysi

s(D

PMC

38)

CM

Pla

nR

evie

w-P

ernz

ztA

cgw

stho

nC

V40

0iR

evie

wC

onst

rD

ocum

ents

&Se

cure

UC

CPe

rmit

PR

CV4O

1OPr

ovid

eFu

ndin

gfo

rC

onst

ruct

ion

Con

trac

tsC

A

CV

4020

Secu

reB

idC

lear

ance

CM

Adv

ertis

e-B

id-A

war

dC

V50

0IA

dver

tise

Proj

ect&

Bid

Con

stru

ctio

nC

ontr

acts

CP

CV5O

IOO

pen

Con

stru

ctio

nB

ids

CP

CVSO

II

Eva

luat

eB

ids

&Pr

epR

ecom

men

datio

nfo

rA

war

dC

M

CV

5Oi2

Eva

luat

eB

ids

&Pr

epR

ecom

men

datio

nfo

rA

war

dA

E

CV

5Oi4

Com

plet

eR

ecom

men

datio

nfo

rAw

ard

CP

CV

5020

Aw

ardC

onst

ruct

ionC

ontr

acts

/lss

ueN

TP

CP

:

Con

sfru

ctio

nC

’P

roje

ctC

onst

ruct

ion

Slar

tfls

sue

NT

PC

M

CV

6mi

Con

trac

tSta

rtlC

ontr

actW

ork

(25%

)C

ompl

ete

CO

N

CV

tOO

2Pr

econ

stru

cuon

Mee

ting

CM

CV

t()03

Beg

inPr

econ

stru

ctio

nSu

bmitt

als

CO

N

CVI5

004

Lon

gest

Lea

dPr

ocur

emen

tIte

mO

rder

edC

ON

CVtO

OS

Lea

dT

ime

for

Lon

gest

Lea

dPr

ocur

emen

tIt

emC

ON

Prep

are

&Su

bmit

Shop

Dra

win

gsC

ON

CV

6007

Com

plet

eC

onst

ruct

ion

Subm

ittal

sC

ON

CVSO

I IR

ough

ing

Wor

kSt

art

CO

N

CV

eoia

Perf

orm

Rou

ghin

gW

ork

CO

N

CVSO

IOC

ontr

actW

ork

(50%

+)C

ompl

ete

CO

N

CV

tOt3

Lon

gest

Lea

dPr

ocur

emen

tIte

mD

eliv

ered

CO

N

“°

Con

trac

tW

ork

(75%

)C

ompl

ete

CO

N

NO

TE

:D

BC

AT

ES

TSl

ieet

2or3

Ref

erto

sect

ion

“IV

Pro

ject

Sche

dule

”of

the

Bur

eau

ofD

esig

n&

Con

stru

ctio

nSe

rvic

esSc

ope

ofW

ork

for

cont

ract

phas

edu

rati

ons.

Rou

tine

Pro

ject

1xli

i I)i

t@

Pil

mav

era

Syst

ems,

Inc.

Page 3 of 4

Act

ivity

11)

-

t)es

crip

tion

si)r

.C

VO

14R

ough

ing

Wor

kC

ompl

ete

CO

N

CV

6021

Inte

rior

Fini

shes

Star

tC

ON

CV

)22

Inst

all

Inte

rior

Fini

shes

CO

N

CV

O3O

Con

trac

tWor

kto

Subs

tant

ialC

ompl

etio

nC

ON

(DV

O3l

Subs

tant

ialC

ompl

etio

nD

ecla

red

CM

CVC’

075

Com

plet

eD

efer

red

Punc

hL

ist)

Seas

onal

Act

iviti

esC

OI4

CV

6079

Proj

ectC

onst

ruct

ion

Com

plet

eC

M:

CV60

84)

Clo

seO

utC

onst

ruct

ion

Con

trac

tsC

M

CV

6O&

Con

stru

ctio

nC

ontr

acts

Com

plet

eC

M

CV6O

SOC

lose

Out

A/E

Con

trac

tC

M

CV

6092

Proj

ectC

ompl

etio

nD

ecla

red

CM

NO

TE

:D

BC

AT

ES

TS

hee

t3of3

Ref

erto

sect

ion

“IV

Pro

ject

Sche

dule

”of

the

Bure

auof

Des

ign

&C

onst

ruct

ion

Ser

vic

esSc

ope

ofW

ork

for

cont

ract

phas

edu

ratio

ns.

Routi

ne

Pro

ject

Ixli

i bit

‘

©P

rim

aver

aS

yste

ms,

Inc.

Page 4 of 4

NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Salt Storage Site

Location Map - Route 24, Mile Post 5.6

EXHIBIT ‘B’

NJDOT Proposed Florham Park Salt Storage Site

Site Map - Route 24, Mile Post 5.6

EXHIBIT ‘C’

Abandoned

Cloverleaf

Interchange

Example - Fabric Covered Salt Structure

EXHIBIT ‘D’

Example – Above Ground Truck Scale

EXHIBIT ‘E’

Example – Hydrostatic Load Cell & Ramp to Scale

EXHIBIT ‘E’

Example – Truck Scale Building

EXHIBIT ‘F’

Example – Loader Storage Building

EXHIBIT ‘G’

EXHIBIT ‘H’

NJDOT Proposed Salt Storage Building Route 24 WB/EB

(160-ft wide x 360-ft length, storage capacity 38,000 tons) Florham Park, Morris County, NJ

Locations screened for environmental concerns.

EXHIBIT ‘H’

NJDOT Route 24, Florham Park

• Wetlands/Streams Based on NJDEP-NJ-Geo Web (2012), the 2007 freshwater wetland map there are the various types of wetlands and riparian present on Rte. 24 east and west bound proposed sites that are of concern for regulatory purposes before project proceeds to construction. SEE MAP BELOW FOR MORE DETAILS

• Watershed Management Area Watershed Management Area 6 - Upper and Mid Passaic, Whippany, Rockaway *A watershed is the area of land that drains into a body of water such as a river, lake, stream or bay. It is separated from other systems by high points in the area such as hills or slopes. It includes not only the waterway itself but also the entire land area that drains to it. For example, the watershed of a lake would include not only the streams entering the lake but also the land area that drains into those streams and eventually the lake. Drainage basins generally refer to large watersheds that encompass the watersheds of many smaller rivers and streams.

SEE MAP BELOW FOR MORE DETAILS

• Flood Zone There are two possible proposed site locations for the salt structures. A portion of the proposed location of Rte. 24 westbound lies within Florham Township, FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel no. 34013C0069F mapped Zone AE - the floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. The remaining portions of the proposed site locations are within Chatham and Florham Townships, is FEMA FIRM Panel no. 34040003C mapped Zone X -area determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. SEE FEMA FIRM MAP BELOW FOR MORE DETAILS

• Threatened and Endangered Species Based on NJDEP-NJ-Geo Web (2012), there are Foraging Great Blue Heron- NJ Status-Special Concern throughout the proposed locations. As a follow-up to DEP, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (US F&W) IPaC was used as reference source. The findings indicate that there are no critical habitats on site. The species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species that may occur in your proposed action area and/or may be affected by your proposed project. This is an unofficial list species list for informational purposes only, and does not

EXHIBIT ‘H’

fulfill the requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. An online request was made to US F&W local office to obtain an Official Species List. SEE MAP BELOW FOR MORE DETAILS

• Stormwater Management N Follow the NJDEP Stormwater Management Rules if applicable to project should

disturbance of one acre or more of development, and/or an increase of impervious surfaces are planned.

Recommendations To schedule a Pre-Application meeting with DEP’s Land Use Regulation Program to determine if permits/approvals are needed for the proposed work.

EXHIBIT ‘H’

NJDOT Proposed Salt Storage Building Route 24 WB/EB

Florham Park, Morris County, NJ

**FEMA Flood Mapping Overlay**

EXHIBIT ‘H’

Watershed Management Area 6 Upper and Mid Passaic, Whippany, Rockaway Watershed Management Area 6 represents the area drained by waters from the upper reaches of the Passaic River Basin including the Passaic River from its headwaters in Morris County to the confluence of the Pompton River. WMA 6 is characterized by extensive suburban development and reliance upon ground water sources for water supply. WMA 6 lies in portions of Morris, Somerset, Sussex and Essex Counties and includes the Upper and Middle Passaic River, Whippany River and Rockaway River Watersheds.

EXHIBIT ‘H’

Artificial Lakes, Riparian-Yes; Foraging Great Blue Heron-NJ Status, Special Concern

Deciduous Wooded Wetlands, Riparian-Yes, Foraging Great Blue

Heron-NJ Status, Special Concern

Deciduous Wooded Wetlands, Riparian-No; No species found

Other urban or built-up land, Riparian-Yes; No species found

Other urban or built-up land, Riparian-Yes; No species found; Mixed deciduous/coniferous-brush/shrubland, No species found

Other urban or built-up land, Riparian-Yes; foraging Great Blue Heron-

NJ Status, Special Concern

NJDOT Proposed Salt Storage Building Route 24 WB/EB

Florham Park, Morris County, NJ

**NJDEP GeoWeb –Interactive Mapping** Landscape Species Based-Habitat- Piedmont Plains

EXHIBIT ‘H’

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

My project

IPaC Trust Resource Report

Generated June 19, 2015 09:38 AM MDT

NAME NJDOT Proposed Salt Storage Building

PROJECT CODE ILEHJ-PUUYJ-EXPFM-B5UEF-7DSVO4

US Fish & Wildlife Service

IPaC Trust Resource Report

Project Description

EXHIBIT ‘H’

LOCATION Rte. 24 WB & EB, Florham Park, Morris County, New Jersey

DESCRIPTION Proposed NJDOT Salt Storage Building, 160-ft wide x 300-ft length, with storage capacity of 38,000 tons of salt

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Contact Information Species in this report are managed by:

New Jersey Ecological Services Field Office

927 North Main Street, Building D

Pleasantville, NJ 8232-1454

(609) 646-9310

Endangered Species Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species that are managed by the Endangered Species Program and should be considered as part of an effect analysis for this project.

Mammals

Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis

CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=A000

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis

CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=A0JE

Endangered

Threatened

EXHIBIT ‘H’

Reptiles

Bog (=muhlenberg) Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii

Threatened

CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=C048

Critical Habitats

Potential effects to critical habitat(s) within the project area must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.

There is no critical habitat within this project area

Migratory Birds Birds are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.

Any activity which results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1) . There are no provisions for allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured.

You are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations for the protection of birds as part of this project. This involves analyzing potential impacts and implementing appropriate conservation measures for all project activities.

American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0F3

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bird of conservation concern Year-round https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B008

Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0HI

Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0JY

EXHIBIT ‘H’

Canada Warbler Wilsonia canadensis Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0LL

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B09I

Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0NE

Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0G4

Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica Bird of conservation concern Season: Migrating https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0JM

Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0IN

Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis Bird of conservation concern

Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0JW

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0FU

Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps Bird of conservation concern Year-round https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0JQ

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0K4

Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0L1

EXHIBIT ‘H’

Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0DM

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0JI

Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0HD

Snowy Egret Egretta thula Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0LC

Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0HC

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0IB

Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=B0II

Refuges Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. If your project overlaps or otherwise impacts a Refuge, please contact that Refuge to discuss the authorization process.

Refuge data is unavailable at this time.

EXHIBIT ‘H’

Wetlands Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats from your project may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal Statutes.

Project proponents should discuss the relationship of these requirements to their project with the Regulatory Program of the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.

DATA LIMITATIONS The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.

The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.

Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.

DATA EXCLUSIONS Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.

DATA PRECAUTIONS Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.

Wetland data is unavailable at this time.

View of site looking south along Route 24 southbound.

View of site looking north along Route 24 southbound.

EXHIBIT ‘I’

View looking east across bridge.

View looking west coming off of bridge.

EXHIBIT ‘I’

View along partially developed ramp along southwest cloverleaf.

View of stream along southwest cloverleaf.

EXHIBIT ‘I’

View of interior of southwest cloverleaf.

Another view of interior of southwest cloverleaf. Note bridge in background.

EXHIBIT ‘I’