33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, JapanOctober 10-14 2010

Presenter’s Name: Kinya ICHIMURASpecial Assistant to the Director of the Office, Security and Emergency Management Office, Ports and Harbors Bureau,

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure Transport and Tourism (MLIT)

Economy: JAPAN

Progress Report on Progress Report on ASEAN - Japan ASEAN - Japan

Maritime Transport Security ProgramMaritime Transport Security Program

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

Country CCountry D

Trade partners may not be secure if one port does not implement effective security measures

Factory

Check Check

Ship Security Officer(SSO) Check

PFSOCountry B

Concerned issues of SOLAS/ISPSWhere no external audit scheme exists for security measures, and unless every country implements and maintains effective security measures at their ports and on their ships, our trade network will not remain secure.

Importance of cooperationAssist Contracting Government to implement SOLAS/ISPS effectively and continuously by establishing a PDCA cycle in each country.

Why international cooperation is important?BackgroundBackground

Check

Port Facility Security Officer (PFSO) 2

Country A

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

Strong but difficult and time-consuming in establishing universal framework.

Strong but difficult and time-consuming in establishing universal framework.

Quick but need lots of resources. Possible overlaps with other donors.

Quick but need lots of resources. Possible overlaps with other donors.

-Strength and quickness are balanced.

-Strength and quickness are balanced.

Global approachGlobal approach Bilateral approachBilateral approach

Approaches to assist Capacity Building effortsApproaches to assist Capacity Building effortsApproaches to assist Capacity Building effortsApproaches to assist Capacity Building efforts

Japan: Regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APECJapan: Regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APECJapan: Regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APECJapan: Regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APEC

Overlaps or conflicts between various bilateral & regional efforts need to be minimized. Such efforts should be coordinated and targeted appropriately.

Overlaps or conflicts between various bilateral & regional efforts need to be minimized. Such efforts should be coordinated and targeted appropriately.

Regional approachRegional approachRegional approachRegional approach

Capacity Building efforts and initiatives on Maritime SecurityCapacity Building efforts and initiatives on Maritime Security

3

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

-Currently, 21 projects are in progress. Maritime Transport Security is one of the selected important themes.-7 of 21 projects are related to maritime issues.

• AJMT-1 ASEAN-Japan Seafarers Policy Cooperation

• AJMT-2 ASEAN-Japan Maritime Transport Security Program

• AJMT-3 ASEAN-Japan Cruise Promotion Project

• AJMT-4 ASEAN-Japan High-Speed Maritime Network

• AJMT-5 ASEAN “Mega-Float” Promotion Project

• AJMT-6 ASEAN-Japan Port Technology Joint Research Project

• AJMT-7 ASEAN-Japan Cooperation on Coast Guard Development

ASEAN-Japan Transport Partnership Projects ASEAN-Japan Transport Partnership Projects

4

• AJMT-1 ASEAN-Japan Seafarers Policy Cooperation

• AJMT-2 ASEAN-Japan Maritime Transport Security Program

• AJMT-3 ASEAN-Japan Cruise Promotion Project

• AJMT-4 ASEAN-Japan High-Speed Maritime Network

• AJMT-5 ASEAN “Mega-Float” Promotion Project

• AJMT-6 ASEAN-Japan Port Technology Joint Research Project

• AJMT-7 ASEAN-Japan Cooperation on Coast Guard Development

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

-Preparation for SOLAS/ISPS Code

3 Seminars2 Work Shops

ASEAN/Japan Maritime Transport Security Program (AJMT-2)ASEAN/Japan Maritime Transport Security Program (AJMT-2)

1st stageHow to comply with

SOLAS(~SOLAS

Enforcement)

(2003~2004)

2nd stageHow effectively &

continuously implement SOLAS

-Effective implementation for SOLAS/ISPS Code

4 Seminars2 Work Shops

(2004~2006)

-Establish a meeting of security experts (Port Security Experts Meeting: PSEM) and further challenge to improve overall level of ISPS compliance in this region.

-Establish PDCA cycle to enable effective and continuous implementation of security measures at port facilities in each country

Develop Regional Action Planon Port Security (RAPPS)

7 PSEMs4 Joint Exercises

3rd stageHow to check & upgrade security measures

(2006~)

Port Security in each country

5

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

1. ASEAN-Japan Joint Exercise on port Security (JE)

2. JICA Training Course on Port Facility Security

Regional Action Plan on Port Security ( RAPPS)

Individual Action Plan ( IAP)

■A driver of the regional approach

○Port Security Expert Meeting (PSEM)　－ Dluft up RAPPS　－ Support member countries to conduct Joint Exercise and follow-up　－ Draw up 6 manuals on capacity building, which is used in Training course 　　 conducted by JICA

■2 layered action plans with aim to establish PDCA cycle

Collective Actions

““How to check & upgrade security measures” How to check & upgrade security measures” (3(3rdrd stage) stage)

6

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

Copntents of JECopntents of JE

-Communication exercise -Field exercise -Evaluation meeting

Summary of JE achievementSummary of JE achievement1. Port Facility Security Plan (PFSP) for port facilities in each country has reviewed by itself

and its effectiveness has been confirmed.2. Each country has recognized the importance of PDCA cycle on port security.3. Each country has acquired knowledge and ability to independently implement port security

exercises.

The Aim of JEThe Aim of JE• The goal of RAPPS is to establish PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Action) cycle for effective and

continuous implementation of security measures by regularly conducted audit and exercise at port facilities in each country.

• With the goal above, Joint Exercise (JE), as a project in RAPPS, has been conducted to let each country learn about counter-security-incident measures and to enable each country to conduct a exercise by itself.

ASEAN-Japan Joint Exercise on Port Security (JE)ASEAN-Japan Joint Exercise on Port Security (JE)

7

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

Scenes from the 4Scenes from the 4thth Joint Exercise Joint Exercise

Communication exercise

Field exercise Evaluation meeting

Communication exercise

8

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

Tokuyamakudamatsu

Wakayamashimotsu

Osaka

Tokyo

Kawasaki

YokohamaKisarazu

Chiba

Yokosuka

Semarang

Kuching

Sib

Bintulu

Miri

Labuan

Kota Kinabaluu

Cebu

Manila

Leam Chabang

Sihanoukville

Yangon

Jurong

Da Nang

44thth Joint Exercise Participants Joint Exercise Participants (Nov.2009, 10 countries, 23 ports)(Nov.2009, 10 countries, 23 ports)

9

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

JICA Training Course on Port Facility SecurityJICA Training Course on Port Facility SecurityInvited Countries (Mainly ASEAN countries)Curriculum (1) Basic knowledge

Basic knowledge on ISPS, security regime and initiative under IMO and major countries including Japan, security threat and terrorist activity.

(2) Table-top exercise Table-top exercise by role-playing the key players on port

security. (The latest course used the APEC Drills and Exercise Manual) (3) Site visit Site visit to various types of port facilities for example at

Yokohama and Nagoya ports. (4) Application Interactive exercises on PFSA, PFSP and Audits.

10

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

Future plansFuture plans

• Regional Action Plan on Port Security (RAPPS) is successfully completed in 2010.

• JICA training courses will be held with the manuals made up in this program, continuously.

• The agreement was made at PSEM7 that ASEAN/ Japan keep seeking for further regional cooperation for capacity building.

• Began a new research project with regard to capacity building in the region.

• PSEM8 will be held in Tokyo next February.

11

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

A New research project for Capacity BuildingA New research project for Capacity Building

12

ObjectivesObjectives• Security-related capacity building for port facility security officer and port facility personnel to

enhance maritime security in this region. -find out a gap in port security, especially about training, certification and audit

-share the latest Best Practice for capacity building

Timeline of the ProjectTimeline of the Project• Research conduction (June 2010)• Questionnaire Presentation of a interim report in Japan APEC (Oct. 2010)• Further discussion in PSEM8 (Feb. 2011)

Main findings (major gaps found in the research)Main findings (major gaps found in the research)<Certification> -In 9 countries, PFSO Is obliged to have a certification as mandatory.

<Audit> -In 1 country, no external audit is conducted once a port facility security plan is approved.-In 1 country, external audit is conducted without any notice in advance.-Some countries request for development of a training course for an internal/external auditor.

<Training> -All of 10 countries conduct a training course for PFSO, in accordance with ISPS code.-However, only 5 countries issue a guideline or a manual for PFSO training although IMO guideline is available as a reference.-Some countries expect a qualification system for a training instructor to be developed.

JAPAN 2010

33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

Thank youThank you

13

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure Transport and TourismPorts and Harbors Bureau