PROGRAMM

ING

MODEL

S &

CONNECTI

ONS

AUGUST 6, 2

010

YOUR FACILITATORS:Kellie Dunn-Poggemann, WISHRM

Secretary & State Director Elect

Helen Englebert, WISHRM State Leadership Director

Linda Johanek, President-Elect , Green Bay SHRM Chapter

2

AGENDA: State Speaker

Database – Kellie Program Assessment

Model – Helen Programming Survey

Review – Linda Next Steps - All

3

NEW PROGRAMMING RESOURCE Resource for ideas, speaker names, and

companies that do presentations Created from prior year State

Conference RFP’s Not secured by an access code Located on the Chapter page of

www.wishrm.org under Other Resources http://www.wishrm.org/Chapters/Presen

tors.aspx

4

DATABASE RESOURCE Information: as submitted for

previous year state conference (i.e. Kalahari 2009)

Each January 1 – next conference proposals will upload

Previous year data will be erased when the new data uploads

5

DATABASE RESOURCE Chapters responsible to make the contact and

ask questions Will they speak at your chapter ? Speaker costs?  Travel Costs or other charges, etc.?

Chapters will need to do their own referencesCouncil is not endorsing any one speaker

6

• Chapters are unable to add speakers

• Council may add council members willing to speak

• Unable to edit any information

• If you encounter concerns with using this as a resource please let the council know

7

DATABASE RESOURCE

PROGRAMMING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

An ongoing process of discovering  what your program’s participants

want in terms of activities and services.

8

1.  Brainstorm Ideas2.  Research3. Conduct Focus

Group4.  Model5.  Survey6.  Try it!7.   Decide8.   Evaluate

9

EIGHT STEP ASSESSMENT MODEL:

Main Functions:

Brainstorm ideas

Choose options Participants

should be members or potential members

Invite people who have ideas, support and enthusiasm

Limit role of focus group

Keep time involved to 1-2 hours

10

USE OF FOCUS GROUPS

GBSHRM SENIOR LEVEL

HR FOCUS GROUP

Selection of ParticipantsInvitation/RSVP ProcessSample Agenda & QuestionsKey FindingsNext Steps

11

15 Chapters participated (Response Rate = 83%)

See Handouts for specific results

Result of recent Programming CLA

Difficulty in finding programming contact for each chapter

Future Item – develop contact list for programming contacts and post on website

12

PROGRAMMING SURVEY:

60%: Securing Quality Speakers

60%: Attracting Senior Level Professionals

60%: Obtaining Strategic Credits

46.7%: Securing Affordable Speakers

40%: Member Engagement

33.3%: Poor Attendance

33.3%: Lack of Time to Network & Socialize

26.7%: Other 20%: Sharing of

Workload Amongst Programming Committee

20%: Meeting Pricing

20%: Cost Control 13.3%: Venue

Issues 13.3%: Meeting

Locations 6.7%: Meeting

Times

13

PROGRAMMING SURVEY : TOP CONCERNS

Chapter Size• 26.7% Small• 53.3% Medium• 20.0% Large

Meeting Times:• 33.3% Breakfast• 26.7% Rotation of

breakfast, lunch & dinner

• 20% Lunch• 20% Rotation of

breakfast and lunch

Reg Meeting Charges:

• 33.3%: $11 - $15• 26.7%: $16 - $20• 20%: Other (varies)• 13.3%: Free• 6.7%: $26 - $30• 6.7%: $31 – 35

Financially:• 40%: Break Even• 33.3%: Combo• 26.7%: Other• 20%: Make Money• 6.7%: Loose Money

14

PROGRAMMING SURVEY: SIZE, TIMES & CHARGES

Programming Responsibility• 46.7% Prog Chair• 26.7% VP• 26.7% Entire Board• 26.7% Other• 13.3% President• 13.3% Pres Elect

Term Limits• 40% One Year• 40% Two Years• 13.3% Other• 6.7% Three Years

80% use committee for programming; 20% do not

15

PROGRAMMING SURVEY: PROGRAMMING RESPONSIBILITY, TERMS & USE OF COMMITTEE

Number Held• 40%: One• 26.7%: Two• 26.7%: None• 6.7%: More than

ThreeDuration:• 40%: Half-Day• 26.7%: N/A• 20%: Full-Day• 20%: Other • 13.3%: Combo of Half

& Full-Day

Member Charge:• 26.7%: N/A• 20%: Depends• 20%: $41 - $60• 13.3%: $61 - $80• 13.3%: $21 - $40• 6.7%: $1 - $20

Financially:• 26.7%: Break Even• 26.7%: Make Money• 20.0%: Other• 13.3%: Loose Money• 13.3%: Combo

16

PROGRAMMING SURVEY: WORKSHOPS

PROGRAMMING SURVEY: SETTING FEES

How do you determine fees for each meeting?

53.3%: Keep same fee, regardless of costs

26.7%: Calculate fee based on costs 26.7%: Other

17

PROGRAMMING SURVEY: MEETING ATTENDANCE

For 2010 to date compared to previous years, how would you characterize

regular meeting attendance?

46.7% About the same 20% Increased 20% Decreased

13.3% Other

18

% of Meetings Receiving HRCI Credits (Gen or Strategic)• 66.7%: 91% -

100%• 13.3%: 31% - 40%• 6.7%: 51% - 60%• 6.7%: 71% - 80%• 6.7%: 81% - 90%

% of Meetings Receiving Strategic HRCI Credits• 33.3%: 11% - 20%• 26.7%: 0 – 10%• 13.3%: 31% - 40%• 6.7%: 21% - 30%• 6.7%: 41% - 50%• 6.7%: 91% - 100%• 6.7%: N/A

19

PROGRAMMING SURVEY : HRCI

Senior level HR programs

Social events Best practices How programming

workload divided RFP’s & Contracts Online

registrations Program

marketing

Top programs from each chapter

Transitional member discounts

Sponsorships Finding speakers Speaker fees Credit card

payments

20

PROGRAMMING SURVEY: ITEMS TO REVIEW

NEXT STEPS: Statewide CLA Calls

How often and when?Who will facilitate?Format?Topics?Guest Speakers?

Use each other as resources? Share chapter meeting marketing materials. National SHRM? Email survey results to Chapter Presidents,

President-Elects & Programming Contacts.

21

22