programmatic budget review fy 17 - texas a&m university ... · programmatic budget review fy 17...
TRANSCRIPT
Programmatic Budget Review
FY 17
Innovation Imagination Integrity Service
Presented by Dr. Dan R. Jones
April 18-19, 2016
2
Section I
Academic/Agency Performance
.
3 Texas A&M University-Commerce
Student Enrollment
*Source: THECB-Accountability Report
8,496 8,879 8,787
9,075
10,280 10,726
11,187 11,068 11,490
12,302
6,014 6,117 6,048
6,187
6,988
7,537 7,798 7,728
8,081
8,833
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015
Headcount FTSE
4 Student Demographic Data
Students
(Fall 2015)
Total HC
Enrollment In State %
Out of
State/
Foreign
% African-
American Hispanic White Other
Undergraduate 7,808 7,518 96% 290 4% 21.5% 17.5% 49.9% 11.1%
Graduate 4,494 3,701 82% 793 18% 17.5% 10.0% 47.3% 25.1%
Total 12,302 11,219 91% 1,083 9%
20%
14.8% 49.0% 16.2%
*Source: Data warehouse-CBM Data
5
Semester Credit Hours
Fall Semester
*Source: PREP-Online, Semester Credit Hour (SCH) Data, Total Semester Credit Hours by Fund
84,227
95,741 103,288 104,617 104,236
108,815
118,265
86,562
97,913
105,597 109,085 108,666 113,522
123,599
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015
State-Funded Total
6 Degrees Awarded
*Source: THECB Accountability System
2,206 2,229
2,329 2,322 2,266
2,560
2,944
3,259 3,079
2,976
1,247 1,278 1,290
1,201 1,153
1,313
1,507
1,518 1,438
1,476
959 951 1,039
1,121 1,113
1,247 1,437
1,741 1,641
1,500
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Total Degrees Awarded
Total Bachelors Degrees Awarded
Total Masters and Doctoral Degrees Awarded
7 Four-Year Graduation Rate
*Source: THECB Accountability System
21.0%
17.9%
20.7%
24.1%
27.9%
22.0%
24.3% 24.4%
22.6%
20.6%
22.1%
26.2%
29.7%
24.5% 25.6%
26.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Same Institution Total
8
Six-Year Graduation Rate
*Source: THECB Accountability System
36.5%
41.6%
36.1% 35.8% 36.4%
45.2% 46.6%
41.7% 43.5%
50.5%
44.8% 42.6%
44.6%
51.3% 53.1%
47.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Same Institution Total
9
First Year Persistence Rate
*Source: THECB Accountability System
65.9%
68.2%
64.2%
71.7% 67.6% 67.5% 67.2%
71.8%
80.9% 81.4% 78.2%
86.6% 81.7% 80.6% 81.3%
86.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014
Same institution Total
10
*Source: THECB Accountability System
First Year Persistence
for Cohort Entering
Six Year Graduation and
Persistence
Fall 2014 State Avg FY 2015 State Avg
All Students 86.0% 86.9% 57.5% 69.9%
White 82.8% 89.6% 63.0% 75.6%
African- American 86.3% 80.3% 46.0% 53.8%
Hispanic 89.1% 85.5% 55.6% 65.2%
First & Sixth Year Persistence Rates
11 Students in Developmental Courses
*Source: TAMUS Data Warehouse, numbers are derived from CBM001 reports submitted to the THECB by institutions.
271 297 331 168 191 154 187
3.0% 2.9%
3.1%
1.5%
1.7%
1.3%
1.5%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
# of Students % of Student Body
12
Number of Undergraduates
Receiving Grant Aid (Not Loans)
Institutions FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
Texas A&M University-Commerce 4,424 4,555 4,895 5,125 5,102
East Tennessee State University 7,810 8,482 9,750 9,453 8,967
Univ of North Carolina at Greensboro 8,005 8,575 8,122 8,865 8,152
Eastern Michigan University 13,639 11,609 13,051 12,871 13,081
Idaho State University 6,225 7,305 7,538 7,175 6,402
The University of West Florida 8,549 7,720 8,229 7,181 7,136
13 Percentage of Undergraduates
Receiving Grant Aid (Not Loans)
Institutions FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
Texas A&M University-Commerce 79% 71% 72% 74% 73%
East Tennessee State University 67% 70% 78% 77% 76%
Univ of North Carolina at Greensboro 46% 57% 55% 59% 55%
Eastern Michigan University 77% 63% 70% 68% 68%
Idaho State University 55% 70% 72% 60% 56%
The University of West Florida 94% 81% 84% 72% 70%
14
Average of Grant Aid Dollars Received
by Undergraduates
Institutions FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
Texas A&M University-Commerce $ 11,308 $ 6,728 $ 6,316 $ 6,488 $ 6,338
East Tennessee State University $ 6,347 $ 6,320 $ 6,807 $ 6,947 $ 6,855
Univ of North Carolina at Greensboro $ 6,594 $ 7,594 $ 7,129 $ 7,121 $ 7,937
Eastern Michigan University $ 12,568 $ 5,683 $ 5,219 $ 5,708 $ 5,879
Idaho State University $ 4,830 $ 5,121 $ 5,000 $ 5,041 $ 5,206
The University of West Florida $ 7,964 $ 7,970 $ 8,636 $ 5,501 $ 5,678
15 Faculty & Staff Demographics
Fall 2015 Total African-
American Hispanic White Other
Faculty 648 48 36 485 79
Staff 978 104 65 597 212
Total 1,626 152 101 1,082 291
16 Student to Faculty Ratio
20
22
21
19
20
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014
FTSE per 1 FTFE
Source: THECB Accountability
17
Staffing Ratio Per 100 FTSE’s (In State Peer Comparison-Doctoral)
Institutions FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
Texas A&M University-Kingsville 15.7 15.1 14.3 13.5 13.1 14.7
Texas Southern University 25.8 26.2 14.2 12.5 13.7 13.6
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi 14.6 14.2 14.0 13.5 12.7 12.0
Sam Houston State University 10.0 10.5 10.1 9.9 11.2 11.5
The University of Texas-Pan American 12.4 11.3 11.3 10.8 11.0 11.2
Texas A&M University-Commerce 13.1 11.5 11.7 10.7 12.1 11.7
Texas Woman's University 13.2 12.5 11.4 11.2 10.8 11.1
*Source: IPEDS
18
Staffing Ratio Per 100 FTSE’s (Out of State Peer Comparison-Doctoral)
Institutions FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
East Tennessee State University 16.9 16.7 17.2 17.5 18.3
Idaho State University 16.5 16.1 15.6 16.3 16.6
University of North Carolina at Greensboro 15.5 15.6 16.1 16.2 16.3
Eastern Michigan University 11.4 11.3 11.2 11.2 11.4
Texas A&M University-Commerce 11.5 11.7 10.7 12.1 11.7
The University of West Florida 12.1 11.7 11.5 12.6 13.0
*Source: IPEDS
19
Patent and License Data
• A provisional patent is pending for the technology of two Ribonucleic Acids(RNA’s) that have ability to convert non-muscle cells into cardiac muscle cells.
• NeoHeart, LLC, a new start-up company, was developed by the lead inventor of these two RNA technologies, Dr. Larry Lemanski, a professor in our Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences.
Patent
• A license agreement prepared to license the two RNA technologies to NeoHeart, LLC.
• The license agreement has been submitted for approval by OGC.
License Data
• Award from the Chancellor’s Research Initiative for recruitment of highly qualified research faculty to conduct research in the soon to be developed Bio Medical Institute for Regenerative Research (BIRR).
• The Institute will lead A&M Commerce into a new journey of biomedical research innovation and entrepreneurship.
New Research Institute
20
Section II
Academic Program Development
.
Academic Program Expansion and
Development Plans
21
• BS Public Health (BSPH), Fall 2015
• BBA Business Analytics, Fall 2015
• MS Business Analytics, Fall 2015
Recently Approved Programs:
• BS Electrical Engineering
• MSN Nursing
In Process / Pending Board Review:
• BA/BS Athletic Training
• BBA Management Information Systems
• BS Health Promotion
• BPA Professional Accountancy
• MA/MS Interdisciplinary Studies
Phased Out or Being Phased Out:
• Major and Minor in African American Studies
• Biomedical Institute for Regenerative Research
• BA Latin American and U.S. Latino Studies
• BFA Photography
• DBA Business Administration
• MS in Liberal Studies
In Planning:
Review Processes for
Academic Program Development
22
• Institution research-based planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes, result in continuous improvement in institutional quality and demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.
The University Aligns Program Development According to SACSCOC Principles & Texas Administrative Code
• Requests for new programs, course enhancements, modifications to existing program, and requests to remove existing programs route through CourseLeaf.
• A review document is utilized to facilitate an introduction of the department and any updates since the last review, identify departmental structure and plans, commitment to student learning, and recommendations for implementation.
The University Utilizes Specialized Software for Programmatic Requests & Engages in a 5-7 Year Review Cycle
• The institution offers degree programs that embody a coherent course of study that is compatible with it’s stated mission and is based upon fields of study appropriate to higher education.
• The institution structures its graduate curricula (1) to include knowledge of the literature of the discipline and (2) to ensure ongoing student engagement in research and/or appropriate professional practice and training experiences.
Degree Programs & Curricula
23
Section III
Financial
.
24
State Appropriations – General Revenue (In Thousands)
$33,433 $33,532
$31,306 $31,277
$33,570 $33,678
$35,997 $36,105
$28,000
$29,000
$30,000
$31,000
$32,000
$33,000
$34,000
$35,000
$36,000
$37,000
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
*Excludes TRB's
25 Pell Grant and Student Aid as a
Percent of Total Revenue (In Millions)
*Source: Data Warehouse and Executive Budget Summary
FY 2014 % of Total FY 2015 % of Total
Pell Grant Revenue $16,532 10% $16,589 10%
Other Financial Aid Revenue $5,581 3% $6,602 4%
Total Financial Aid Revenue $22,114 13% $23,191 14%
Total Revenue $171,932 $167,231
26
Tuition and Fees per FTE (Out of State Peer Comparison)
*Source: Texas Higher Education Accountability System, Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness, Universities (Texas Public)
Institutions FY 2014
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
$ 5,658
The University of West Florida
$ 5,937
Texas A&M University-Commerce $ 7,175
Idaho State University $ 7,624
East Tennessee State University $ 7,690
Eastern Michigan University $ 9,345
27
Tuition and Fees per FTE (In State Doctoral Comparison)
*Source: Texas Higher Education Accountability System
Institutions FY
2007
FY
2008
FY
2009
FY
2010
FY
2011
FY
2012
FY
2013
FY
2014
Texas A&M University-Commerce $4,632 $5,222 $5,033 $5,177 $6,317 $6,997 $7,721 $7,175
Sam Houston State University $4,668 $4,834 $5,212 $5,340 $5,398 $6,098 $7,143 $7.273
Texas Southern University $9,564 $9,345 $9,457 $11,976 $6,522 $6,124 $6,770 $5,996
Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi $4,458 $4,908 $4,883 $5,317 $5,686 $6.335 $6,678 $6,793
Texas A & M University-Kingsville $3,991 $4,314 $4,466 $4,683 $4,715 $5,194 $5,669 $6,090
Texas Woman's University $5,496 $5,055 $5,218 $5,220 $5,444 $5,843 $5,374 $5,487
The University of Texas-Pan American $2,710 $3,204 $3,231 $3,043 $3,117 $3,625 $3,951 N/A
28 Revenue per FTSE and Revenue per FTFE
$13,000
$13,500
$14,000
$14,500
$15,000
$15,500
$16,000
$130,000
$135,000
$140,000
$145,000
$150,000
$155,000
$160,000
$165,000
$170,000
$175,000
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Total Revenue per FTFE Total Revenue per FTSE
*Source: THECB - Accountability System
29 Reserves and Months of Reserves
Source: AFR III-1 - Schedule (E&G, Designated, Auxiliary Only)
4.20
4.80
5.84 5.76
4.79 4.58
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
$-
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Uncommitted - Unreserved # of Months
30
Tuition & Fees
.
31
Historical Tuition and Fees for
Resident Undergraduate, 15 SCH’s
$3,360 $3,360
$3,548
$3,716
$3,949
$3,000
$3,100
$3,200
$3,300
$3,400
$3,500
$3,600
$3,700
$3,800
$3,900
$4,000
Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2016
32 Hazlewood Historical Trend and Projections
Source: THECB Hazlewood Report, FY16-17 are estimated
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17
Veterans Spouse/ Dependent Legacy
$1,555,349
$2,363,889
$2,641,339 $2,618,369
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
33
FY 2017 Proposed Revenue
Budget and Variance
.
34
Revenue Budget and Variance
Budget (In Thousands)
Variance
Revenues FY 2016 FY 2017 Amount %
State Appropriations $ 48,193 $ 53,699 $ 5,506 11%
Higher Education Fund $ 7,191 $ 10,786 $ 3,595 50%
Tuition and Fees (Gross) $ 82,493 $ 88,029 $ 5,536 7%
Contracts and Grants $ 6,115 $ 6,841 $ 726 12%
Student Financial Assistance $ 21,438 $ 23,031 $ 1,593 7%
Gifts $ 1,070 $ 1,550 $ 480 45%
Sales and Services $ 19,832 $ 21,437 $ 1,605 8%
Investment Income $ 2,932 $ 2,922 $ (10) 0%
Other Income $ 146 $ 146 $ 0 0%
Discounts $ (20,163) $ (203,011) $ (2,848) 14%
Total Revenues $ 169,247 $ 185,430 $ 16,183 10%
35
FY 2017 Revenue Budget
Total Revenue Budget: $185,430 (thousand)
State Appropriations 26%
Tuition and Fees (Gross) 42%
Contracts and Grants 3%
Student Financial Assistance
11%
Gifts 1%
Sales and Services 10%
Investment Income 2%
Other Income 0%
Higher Education Fund 5%
REVENUES
36
Trends and Metrics
.
37
Operating Expense per FTSE
Source: THECB Accountability
$12,333 $12,275
$13,230
$13,895
$13,573
$11,000
$11,500
$12,000
$12,500
$13,000
$13,500
$14,000
$14,500
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Operating Expense per FTSE
38 Administrative Cost Ratio
Source: THECB Accountability
10.3%
11.0%
10.7%
10.2% 10.2%
9.8%
10.0%
10.2%
10.4%
10.6%
10.8%
11.0%
11.2%
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
39
NSF Research Expenditure (In Thousands)
*Source: NSF Rankings
$2,679
$2,242 $2,279
$2,541
$2,833
$3,755
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
40
NSF Research Expenditures by Source (In Thousands)
*Source: NSF Rankings
Federal Government
$1,121 30%
State/Local Government
$1,159 31%
Business/ Nonprofit/
Other $433 11%
Institutional Funds $1,042 28%
41
FY 2017 Proposed
Expense Budget and Variance
.
42
FY 2017 Proposed Expense Budget
Variance by Category (In Thousands)
Budget Variance Total Expenditures FY 2016 FY 2017 Amount %
Salaries - Faculty $ 33,018 $ 34,974 $ 1,956 6%
Salaries - Non-Faculty $ 29,151 $ 30,352 $ 1,201 4%
Wages $ 4,527 $ 4,615 $ 88 2%
Benefits $ 18,046 $ 20,644 $ 2,598 14%
Personnel Costs $ 84,742 $ 90,585 $ 5,843 7%
Utilities $ 4,932 $ 5,035 $ 103 2%
Scholarships $ 42,067 $ 44,909 $ 2,842 7%
Discounts $ (20,163) $ (23,011) $ (2,848) 14%
Equipment (capitalized) $ 2,016 $ 3,844 $ 1,828 91%
Operations and Maintenance $ 42,413 $ 46,017 $ 3,604 8%
Total Expenditures $ 156,007 $ 167,379 $ 11,372 7%
RFS Transfer $ 9,989 $ 13,702 $ 3,713 37%
Total $ 165,996 $ 181,081 $ 15,085 9%
43
Total Expense Budget: $167,378 plus RFS Debt Service $13,372
FY 2017 Expense Budget (In Thousands)
Personnel Costs 47%
Utilities 3%
Scholarships 24%
Equipment (capitalized)
2%
Operations and Maintenance
24%
EXPENSES
44
FY 2017 Proposed Expense Budget
Variance by Fund Group/NACUBO Function
Budget Variance
E&G and Designated FY 2016 FY 2017 Amount %
Instruction $ 54,300 $ 56,447 $ 2,147 4%
Academic Support $ 16,425 $ 17,149 $ 724 4%
Student Services $ 10,029 $ 11,574 $ 1,546 15%
Scholarships and Fellowships $ 8,886 $ 9,849 $ 963 11%
Institutional Support $ 11,062 $ 12,205 $ 1,143 10%
O&M of Plant $ 13,410 $ 13,118 $ (292) -2%
Public Service $ 1,385 $ 1,436 $ 51 4%
Research $ 739 $ 2,054 $ 1,315 178%
E&G and Designated Subtotal $ 116,234 $ 123,832 $ 7,598 7%
Auxiliary $ 25,780 $ 27,939 $ 2,159 8%
Auxiliary Subtotal $ 25,780 $ 27,939 $ 2,159 8%
Restricted
Instruction $ 557 $ 44 $ (513) -92%
Academic Support $ 178 $ - $ (178) -100%
Student Services $ 711 $ 1,193 $ 482 68%
Scholarships and Fellowships $ 11,648 $ 12,611 $ 962 8%
Public Service $ 163 $ 477 $ 314 193%
Research $ 736 $ 1,283 $ 547 74%
Restricted Subtotal $ 13,993 $ 15,607 $ 1,614 12%
Total $ 156,007 $ 167,379 $ 11,370 5%
45
New Goals and Objectives (Including Method of Finance)
Goal 1: Graduate More Students with High Impact Experience
Budget Impact Method of Finance FTE's
Additional Faculty Lines $670 thousand 9
New Tuition Revenue $350 thousand
Reallocation of existing funds $320 thousand
Nursing and Health Sciences Building $5.7 million N/A
Tuition Revenue Bond $3.7 million
Higher Education Fund $2 million
46 New Goals and Objectives
(Including Method of Finance)
Goal 2: Retain High Quality Faculty & Staff
Budget Impact Method of Finance FTE's
Merit Raise $1 million
FY 2016 – FY 2017 GR Revenue $1 million
Faculty Promotions $75 thousand
FY 2016 – FY 2017 GR Revenue $75 thousand
PwC Compensation Review $280 thousand
New Tuition Revenue $280 thousand
47 New Goals and Objectives
(Including Method of Finance)
Goal 3: Innovative Planning
Budget Impact Method of Finance FTE's
Investment in Technology and Equipment $2 million
Higher Education Funds $1.8 million
Fees $200 thousand
Extended University Services $400 thousand
New Tuition Revenue $200 thousand
General Appropriations (MITC) $200 thousand
48 Salary Plans
FY 2017 Salary Plan Amount
Faculty
2% Merit Pool $ 550,000
Promotions and Market Adjustments 75,000
Benefits 132,000
Faculty
Subtotal $ 757,000
Staff
2% Merit Pool $ 450,000
PwC Class Compensation Project 280,000
Benefits 146,000
Staff
Subtotal $ 876,000
Total $ 1,633,000
49
Section IV.
Request to Exceed FTE Limit
.
50
Texas A&M-Commerce Will
Not Request Any Increases
Current FTE Cap Level 797
Requested Increase 0
Revised Cap 797
51
Section V.
Auxiliary Operations
.
52
Residence Life (In Thousands)
Residential Life Actuals Budget Budget Variance
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 $ %
Revenue $ 12,411 $ 11,590 $ 12,132 $ 542 5%
Operating Expenses $ 6,135 $ 7,194 $ 7,742 $ 548 8%
Debt Expense $ 4,412 $ 4,396 $ 4,390 $ (6) 0%
Net Income (Loss) $ 1,864 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0%
53 Food Services
(In Thousands)
Food Services Actuals Budget Budget Variance
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 $ %
Revenue $ 5,961 $ 5,161 $ 6,210 $ 1,049 20%
Operating Expenses $ 5,124 $ 4,618 $ 5,665 $ 1,047 23%
Debt Expense $ 545 $ 543 $ 545 $ 2 0%
Net Income (Loss) $ 292 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0%
54
Athletics (In Thousands)
Athletics Actuals Budget Budget Variance
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 $ %
Revenue $ 6,067 $ 5,756 $ 6,139 $ 383 7%
Operating Expenses $ 5,985 $ 5,676 $ 6,056 $ 380 7%
Debt Expense $ 82 $ 80 $ 83 $ 3 4%
Net Income (Loss) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0%
55
Section VI.
Capital Plan Update
.
56 Capital Planning
Priority Projects on
Current Capital Plan
Planning
Amount
Primary
Funding
Sources
Current Status Gross Square
Footage
Nursing & Health
Sciences $54M TRB Design 112,000
Morris Rec Center
Expansion $5M Student Fees Concept 10,000
57 Nursing & Health Sciences Building
58 Expansion of the Morris Recreation Center
59
Additional Projects
.
60 P3 Residence Hall
61 Possible Upcoming Projects
Priority Projects on
Current Capital Plan
Planning
Amount
Primary
Funding
Sources
Current Status Gross Square
Footage
Projected
Date
Library Center for
Educational
Innovation/Faculty
Development
$60M TRB* Concept 141,200 2018
Gee Library
Renovation/Repurposing $20M TRB Concept 140,250 2020
Multi Purpose Event
Center $30M Athletic Fee Concept 100,000 2020
62 Library & Center for Educational Innovation &
Faculty Development
63 Gee Library Renovation/Repurposing
64 Multipurpose Event Center
65 Audit Update
Texas A&M University-
Commerce
Total # of
Recommendations
Per Follow-Up Audit Number of
Recommendations
Date of Follow–
up Audit Cleared Remaining
Financial Management
Services & Tuition and Fees
FY 2016
4* November 2016 2 2
Review of Governance 0 N/A N/A N/A
*TAMUC has implemented 3 out of 4 recommendations as of March 2016
66
66