program implementation review of community health partnership program zff 2015

30
Community Health Partnership Program ZFF Program Implementation Review Midyear 2015

Upload: bien-nillos

Post on 03-Aug-2015

99 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Community Health Partnership Program

ZFF Program Implementation ReviewMidyear 2015

Page 2: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Social Problem to AddressOpportunity to contributePursuit for “Sense”Yearning to Grow and Expand

The Journey: Going to Places We’ve Never Been Before

ZFF’s Mission and VisionMDG’s Number 4 and 5

Page 3: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

72 Mayors, Municipal Health Officers and “Community Leaders”

The Sojourners

Cohort LGUs1 92 123 84 65 66 47 11

UMAK1 8UMAK2 8

Total 72

Models Total LGUs

ARMM 17

GIDA 18

Poor 38

Number of years Number of LGUs

>5 213-5 24< 3 27

Cohort 4

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015

CurrentCohort 6Cohort 5

Cohort 3Cohort 2Cohort 1

Cohort 7

LGUs

ZFF 5 6 7 9 10 4 11 9

Page 4: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

The Beginnings

CHPP ARMM GIDA Poor

145.0 128.9

350.0

130.0

Maternal Mortality Ratio BaselinesSeries1

CHPP ARMM GIDA Poor

47.5

21.2 22.745.0

90.0

Facilities-based Deliveries BaselinesSeries1

CHPP ARMM GIDA Poor

71.452.6

22.7

60.8

90.0

Deliveries attended by Skilled Birth Attendants Baseline Rates

Series1

CHPP ARMM GIDA Poor

7.711.0

23.5

6.6

Infant Mortality Rate BaselinesSeries1

Page 5: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

The Ongoings

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

145.0

108.7 115.6 102.2 92.2

128.9

98.8

48.337.7

57.3

350.0 350.1 342.7346.7

244.6

130.0

85.2 87.067.1 66.7

Maternal Mortality Ratios, per 100,000 live births

CHPP ARMM GIDA Poor National

Page 6: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

The Challenges

Models Maternal Deaths(2013-2014)

Maternal Deaths including Referral

Hospitals(2013-2014)

Variance

ARMM 13 23 10GIDA 41 44 3Poor 31 67 36CHPP 85 134 49

Three Delays:FIRST DELAY factors= issues on availability and affordability and acceptability of health care servicesSECOND DELAY factors= issues on accessibilityTHIRD DELAY factors= issues on quality of health care services provided

Page 7: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

The Ongoings

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

47.5

34.6

56.862.5

70.8

21.2 19.4

29.9

41.6

51.7

22.7 22.7

42.1

66.4

74.5

45.051.2

74.7 73.5

81.9

Facilities-based deliveries rateCHPP ARMM GIDA Poor National

Page 8: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

The Ongoings

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

71.463.1

71.3 73.679.8

52.6

64.3 64.969.7

74.6

22.7

34.0

60.764.6

77.7

60.865.4

77.8 78.983.8

Deliveries Attended by Skilled Birth Attendants Rates

CHPP ARMM GIDA Poor National

Page 9: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

The Ongoings

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

7.75.7

6.95.5 5.7

11.0

3.3 2.8 3.0 2.9

23.5 23.5

18.2

15.914.4

6.65.4

6.4

4.35.5

Infant Mortality Rates, per 1,000 live births

CHPP ARMM GIDA Poor National

Page 10: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

What Now? What will it take for the local government

units to sustain and/or further improve health gains?

Page 11: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Leadership and Governance:

Technical and AdaptiveReframeInnovate

Coach

SUPPLY SIDE(Availability, Accessibility,

Affordability)

DEMAND SIDE(Acceptability, Equitability)

IMPROVED QUALITY OF

HEALTH:Sentinel Indicators – Nutrition, Water and Sanitation and

Communicable Diseases

RESILIENT HEALTH SYSTEMS

EDUCATION AS A SOCIAL DETERMINANT

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AS A SOCIAL DETERMINANT IMPA

CT O

N Q

UAL

ITY

OF

LIFE

Alumni CLHDP Framework

Page 12: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Emerging Insights from CLHDP

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

114.4100.8 98.9

76.4 79.6

227.5

133.7

104.0

82.7 86.3

60.9 60.9

91.4

67.8 70.4

Non-ARMM Alumni LGUs MMR per 100,000

Alumni nonCLHDP CLHDP National

9 LGUs

33 LGUs

Page 13: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014Padre Burgos, Quezon 10.18 15.44 15.62 17.2 110 115 105 105Pilar, Sorsogon 13.4 11 13.9 15.69 95 102 155San Pablo, Zamboanga del Sur 8.11 7.5 6.82 5.2 37 32 29 32Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay 9.5 8.72 8.62 8.26 48 63 68 95Ivisan, Capiz 87 5 3.4 2.61 50 63 77 47Motiong, Samar 18 18 13 15 10 7 10 19Limasawa, Southern Leyte 2 2 1.9 1 4 10 11 7

MunicipalityMalnutrition Rate TB Cases

SDH Indicators of CLHDP Batch 1

Page 14: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014

Padre Burgos, Quezon 103.96 103.18 99.71 102.28 89.6 89.6

Bacolod, Lanao del Norte 94.36 95.27 95 94.88 92 92.5 93 92.50

Pilar, Sorsogon 0.00 0.00

San Pablo, Zamboanga del Sur 97.65 99.1 98.38 0.00

Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay 0.00 0.00

Ivisan, Capiz 98 98 98.00 83.5 84.62 88.21 85.44

Motiong, Samar 78 78 100 100 89.00 88.41 82.5 90.95 92.77 88.66

Kayapa, Nueva Vizcaya 92.87 94.02 95 93.96 11.3 10 12.52 11.27

Limasawa, Southern Leyte 99.44 99.44 99.28 99.74 99.48 91 89.36 92.82 94.16 91.84

Municipality

Municipal Participation Rate

Average AverageElementary High School

SDH Indicators of CLHDP Batch 1

Page 15: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014

Padre Burgos, Quezon 66.67 64.61 81.41 70.90 81.36 81.36

Bacolod, Lanao del Norte 91.15 90.19 90 90.45 91 91.5 92 91.50

Pilar, Sorsogon 0.00 0.00

San Pablo, Zamboanga del Sur 63.71 74.85 60.88 61.91 66.48 88.19 88.54 83.13 87.66 86.88

Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay 60.91 97.89 56.17 59.75 68.68 60.87 66.57 63.72

Ivisan, Capiz 84 88.95 86.48 70.92 74.18 70.86 71.99

Motiong, Samar 98 98 99.15 99.89 98.76 88.89 87.03 90.08 91.88 89.47

Kayapa, Nueva Vizcaya 81.17 89.59 79.84 83.53 61 68 81.5 70.17

Limasawa, Southern Leyte 91.26 92.69 95.28 93.14 93.09 65 61.98 64.66 73.15 66.20

Municipality

Municipal Completion Rate Average

Elementary HighschoolAverage Average

SDH Indicators of CLHDP Batch 1

Page 16: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Educational Indicators

2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014

Padre Burgos, Quezon 64.12 58.44 51.07 57.88 45.1 45.1

Bacolod, Lanao del Norte 81.22 78.3 79.33 79.62 82 80 81 81.00

Pilar, Sorsogon 0.00 0.00

San Pablo, Zamboanga del Sur 64.15 63.9 63.9 72.82 66.19 38.33 49.29 38.31 48.22 43.54

Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay 66.74 61.12 66.95 66.57 65.35 60.29 62.71 61.50

Ivisan, Capiz 82.2 82.44 83.76 82.80 48.47 58.9 62.48 56.62

Motiong, Samar 82 82.07 78.53 76.61 79.80 71.42 47.11 52.94 73.51 61.25

Kayapa, Nueva Vizcaya 66.75 71.31 70.02 69.36 53.21 56.3 54.76

Limasawa, Southern Leyte 75.66 81.03 88.44 81.71 68.49 73.02 74.59 72.03

Average

Municipality

Municipal NAT Scores

AverageElementary Highschool

Page 17: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Municipality2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Cervantes, Ilocos Sur 5.83% 3.47% 3.39% 19 8 15Looc, Romblon 11.28% 9.03% 10.10% 80 80 126Goa, Camarines Sur 10.50% 10 11 104 189 206Dao, Capiz 3.13% 3.02% 2.53% 66 84 70Hinatuan, Surigao del Sur 9.90% 9.90% 9.10% 98 107 274Tinambac, Camarines Sur 28% 21% 19% 122 134 122Santol, La Union 5.12% 5.79% 4.64% 31 12 12

Malnutrition rate TB cases

SDH Indicators of CLHDP Batch 2

Page 18: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Cervantes, Ilocos Sur

Looc, Romblon 97% 98% 98% 95.88% 96.36% 95.37%

Goa, Camarines Sur

Dao, Capiz 89.66% 92.61% 94.15% 86.72% 83.58% 83.68%

Hinatuan, Surigao del Sur 102% 97% 94% 76.59% 75.06% 77.15%

Tinambac, Camarines Sur 90.56% 90.61% 91.72% 76.47% 81.03% 83.54%

Santol, La Union 100% 98.12% 100% 89% 84.09%

Municipality

Municipal Participation Rate

Elementary High School

SDH Indicators of CLHDP Batch 2SDH Indicators of CLHDP Batch 2

Page 19: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Cervantes, Ilocos Sur

Looc, Romblon 98% 98% 73.02% 70.97% 73.60%

Goa, Camarines Sur

Dao, Capiz 74.65% 84.67% 78.73% 73.52% 85.76%

Hinatuan, Surigao del Sur 64.52% 69.99% 77.15% 71.95% 66.08%

Tinambac, Camarines Sur 68.06% 83.07% 61.76% 66.53% 68.65%

Santol, La Union 90.81% 92.75% 97.30% 97.36% 84.04%

High SchoolMunicipality

Municipal Completion Rate

Elementary

SDH Indicators of CLHDP Batch 2

Page 20: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

As of mid-year 2015

Where we are now

CohortMaternal

Deaths 2014

Maternal Deaths mid-

20151 10 02 6 33 3 54 7 15 6 16 3 17 15 4

UMAK1 2 2UMAK2 6 3

Total 58 20

REFERRAL HOSPITALIN TRANSITHOME DEATHS

DELAYS

INTERVENTIONS

40%

5%

55%

Place of Death

Home In TransitReferral Hospital

SBCC-Oriented IECIncentivization

Philhealth EnrolmentMaternal Shelters

TBA Referrals/Women’s Health Team

Functional Referral Communication SystemTracking System

Page 21: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

DELAY ONE DELAY TWO DELAY THREE

Behavior Change Communication Barangay Health System

“Blood” and/or other supplies

Incentives Infrastructure (road) Inter-facilities communication

Leadership Leadership Leadership

Improved IEC Improved Transport Improved competencies

Social Support Strengthened Referral

Specialists/staff (HR)

Primum non nocereSecundo ne moram

B.I.L.I.S.

Page 22: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

C-SOARChallenges Strengths Opportunities Aspirations Results

ARMM: Deaths moving to referral hospitals, persistent deaths at home, difficult areas in Maguindanao

ARMM Convergence has RAO/PAOTawi-Tawi has undergone PLGP through the USAID-ZFF partnership

Coordination with ZFF-USAID RAO/PAO

Zero maternal home deaths and Zero maternal hospital deaths

MMR = 0

Alumni LGUs: last term mayors

Last term mayors willing to be part of pool of resource persons

LGUs with new mayors

Sustainable health gains and social development

Zero MMR, Zero IMR,

GIDA persistently high MMR

Increasing FBD, increasing SBA

Technical support for maternal and child related health programs

Decrease home deaths

Deaths due to first delay and second delay factors = 0

Page 23: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Post-TWG Updates

Cohorts Type of TWG

Updates

Alumni RPRH Demand generation for utilization of available FP commodities and modern natural family planning methods. Exploring options on alternative ways of creating demand.

GIDA RPRH Partnering with local NGOs to generate demand for FP through community mobilization. Scheduled trainings for health workers to improve competencies (BIDA sa GIDA)

ARMM MCH Implementation of agreed action plans: focused heavily on demand generation and community mobilization.

Page 24: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

What lies ahead

GIDA ARMM Alumni

Module 4 Cohort 7Roll out of BHLMP with FP modulesAdvocacy for MCIP and Mother’s Bonus

Module 4 Cohort 6Follow up TWG on MCH

Batch 2 Module 2 CLHDPTWG on Referral System StrengtheningTWG on specific SDH (Agriculture)Partnership with UPCM for SDH technical coaching

National Health Leaders Conference – November 19-20, 2015

Page 25: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015
Page 26: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

It is a hopeless cause by B.E. Nillos

It is a hopeless causeAnd I do not believe that

What little I do makes a differenceIn the greater scheme of things

I have realized that“My work is significant!”

Is a lie, instead“this is not worth it!”

So I will tell every poor mother and child in my community thatThey are not important to me

The challenges are real butI am afraid…Troubled

Page 27: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

It is a hopeless cause by B.E. Nillos

For the days ahead areToughI am

WeakI do not believe I am

Capable of doing the things I need to doI am convinced that I am

A Failure

Page 28: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

It is a hopeless cause by B.E. Nillos

I cannot acceptThe work that lies ahead of me

I face todayWith disappointment and setbacks asI reject the idea that the future awaits

With hope for better and happier outcomes.I stand firm on this thought

It is expected that The future is caliginous and forlorn

I could not claim thatMy work can make a difference

It is clear that I am worthless.

It is senseless to think thatThere is hope.

Page 29: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

CHPP 2015

Page 30: Program Implementation Review of Community Health Partnership Program ZFF 2015

Thank You

ZFF Program Implementation ReviewMidyear 2015