prognostic factors in

102
PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN MEDICAL COMA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE NATIONAL POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF NIGERIA IN PART FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE FELLOWSHIP IN PHYSIC. (FMCP, NEUROLOGY) CANDIDATE: DR OBIAKO ONYEADUMARAKWE REGINALD B.Med.Sc, M.B.B.S (UPH, 1987) AF/009/01/003/437 DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL, ZARIA. NIGERIA. AUGUST 2005.

Upload: others

Post on 03-Jan-2022

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

MEDICAL COMA

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE

NATIONAL POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL

COLLEGE OF NIGERIA IN PART

FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT

FOR THE FELLOWSHIP IN PHYSIC.

(FMCP, NEUROLOGY)

CANDIDATE: DR OBIAKO ONYEADUMARAKWE REGINALD

B.Med.Sc, M.B.B.S (UPH, 1987)

AF/009/01/003/437

DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE

AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY TEACHING

HOSPITAL, ZARIA.

NIGERIA.

AUGUST 2005.

Page 2: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

ii

DECLARATION

It is hereby declared that this work is original unless otherwise acknowledged.

The work has neither been presented to any other college for fellowship nor submitted

elsewhere for publication.

--------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Signature of Candidate Date

Page 3: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

iii

CERTIFICATION I

The study reported in this dissertation was done by DR OBIAKO,

ONYEADUMARAKWE REGINALD of the Department of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello

University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria under my supervision.

I have supervised the writing of the dissertation to my satisfaction.

……………………………………………….. ………..……………………

Professor A. 0. Ogunniyi, Bsc,. FMCP, FWACP. Date

Professor of Medicine and Head, Neurology Unit.

Department of Medicine

University College Hospital, lbadan

Nigeria

Page 4: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

iv

CERTIFICATION II

I certify that this study was carried out by DR OBIAKO ONYEADUMARAKWE

REGINALD of the Department of Medicine Ahmadu Bello University Teaching

Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria; under the supervision of Professor A.0. Ogunniyi of the

Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, lbadan.

…………………………………………….. …………………………………..

Head, Department of Medicine Date

Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital

Zaria.

Page 5: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

v

DEDICATION

TO

THE ALMIGHTY GOD

For guiding ME to my DESTINY

MY WIFE

For Her Magnificent Devotion and Patience

MY CHILDREN

My daughter, Uchechi and her brothers, Chikwado,

Chiemeka and Chidube, for their endurance at their tender ages.

MY TEACHERS

For seeing through my mindset.

Page 6: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

My sincere gratitude goes to Professor Adesola O. Ogunniyi for accepting to

supervise my training in Neurology at Ibadan and showing intense personal interest in my

welfare and intellectual progress.

To Professor Ibrahim Abdu-Aguye, who started the process of intellectual

remodeling in me as my first postgraduate research supervisor. I remain his loyal student.

As a Chief Medical Director, GOD used him as a weapon to approve my training at

Ibadan.

Mama, Dr (Mrs) Juliana Okpapi, my head of dept "chose" this path for me. My

sincere gratitude cannot be adequately expressed in words, but by conduct to meet her

expectations.

Professor Geofrey Onyemelukwe deserves special mention. His overt criticisms

but covert encouragements are powerful tonics for intellectual growth. He is a great

teacher. It will be difficult to forget the contributions of Dr S.S Danbauchi, Dr (Mrs)

Ehusani-Anumah, Dr Alhassan, Dr Keshinro, Dr Bosan, Dr Oyati and others too

numerous to mention., to my postgraduate training.

My colleagues - Dr Mbaave, Dr Kwaifa, Dr Yakasai, Dr Akinyemi, Dr

Owolabi, Dr Fadare, Dr Osalusi, Dr Ajuonumah, Dr Gerald etc. I am grateful for

the information which we shared together. I thank Prof Afolabi Bamgboye and Mr

Nathaniel Afolabi for statistical analysis and Miss Nkechi Onwuka for secretarial work.

Finally, I thank sincerely my wife and children for their patience, endurance and

sacrifice throughout the period of my training. May God continue to guide and protect us

as we contribute our quota to quality health care services. AMEN.

Page 7: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

vii

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND

Medical coma in the course of an illness traditionally implies a poor prognosis, but few

data define the factors responsible for this. The identification of these factors will enable

physicians and other health care providers to identify comatose patients most likely to

regain meaningful function with proper therapy, and thus enhance patients' care decisions

and resource allocation, This study was undertaken to determine the factors that affect the

prognosis of medical coma in lbadan, Nigeria.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

The level of consciousness and brainstern functions of 200 patients admitted in medical

coma were assessed at admission, 6 hours later, then daily for 7 days, on the 14th day, the

21 day and finally the 28th day, after which the best outcome was recorded. The Glasgow

Coma Scale and brainstern sign score were used to determine the neurologic status while

information from biodata, relevant history of illness, time of presentation to the

University College Hospital, lbadan, time of diagnosis and treatment, results of

investigations and questionnaires were used to identify other prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Medical coma constituted 9.8% of emergency admissions, 3.1% of total admissions and

16.8% of deaths in University College Hospital, lbadan during an 8-month study period.

The common causes were hemorrhagic stroke, diabetic and uremic coma and

meningitides. Hypertension, hyperglycemia, obesity, HIV and hepatitis B viral infections

Page 8: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

viii

were the predisposing factors identified. Aspiration pneumonia was the commonest co-

morbid illness.

Multivariate analysis showed that the most significant prognostic factors were

delayed presentation, family knowledge of cause of coma, family support, cause of coma,

Glasgow Coma Scale and ability to do relevant investigations.

Page 9: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page i

Declaration ii

Dedication iii

Certification I iv

Certification II v

Acknowledgement vi vi

Summary vii

Table of Contents ix

List of Abbreviations xi

List of Tables xiii

List of Figures xv

List of Appendices xvii

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Neurobiology of consciousness and pathophysiology of coma 3

1.3 Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to coma 5

1.4 Outcome of coma 6

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Epidemiology of medical coma 7

2.2 Causes, Risk Factors and Co-morbid illness associated with coma 8

2.3 Coma as an independent Prognosis factor 9

2.4 Coma scoring system 9

2.5 Justification for study 10

2.6 Aims and objectives 21

Page 10: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

x

CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Study period 12

3.2 Study site 12

3.3 Study population 13

3.4 Study procedure 14

3.5 Statistical Analysis 19

CHAPTER FOUR : RESULTS

4.1 Incidence of medical coma in UCH Ibadan 20

4.2 Socio-demography of data 21

4.3 Distribution of causes of medical coma 23

4.4 Distribution of predisposing factors 29

4.5 Distribution of co-morbid illness (es) complicating medical coma (multiple

response analysis) 33

4.6 Outcome of medical coma 37

4.7 Prediction of the outcome of medical coma using the Glasgow Coma

Scale (GCS) and Brainstem Signs Score (BSS) 56

CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATION OF

THE STUDY

5.1 Discussion 62

5.2 Conclusions 69

5.3 Limitation of the study 70

References 71

Appendices 83

Page 11: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

GCS Glasgow Coma Scale

APACHE Acute physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation

ARAS Ascending reticular activating system

RF Reticular formation

USA United States of America

SUPPORT The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for

Outcomes and Risk of Treatments

EEG Electroencephalogram

DM Diabetes Mellitus

ICP Intracranial Pressure

HIE Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

NCSE Non-convulsive status epilepticus

CNS Central nervous system

DKA Diabetic Ketoacidosis

HONK Hyperosmolar nonketosis

DIC Disseminated intravascular coagulation

ARF/CRF Acute renal failure/chronic renal failure

Ca2+ Calcium

Na+ Sodium

K+ Potassium

CL- Chloride

HC03- Bicarbonate

Page 12: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xii

GIT Gastrointestinal tract

CSF Cerebrospinal fluid

TB Tuberculosis

UI/UCH University of Ibadan/ University College Hospital

A&E Accident and Emergency

ICU Intensive Care Unit

HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus

CT Computerised tomogram

SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences

BSS Brainstem Signs Scores

HBSAg Hepatitis B surface antigen

HT Hypertension

Page 13: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xiii

LIST OF TABLES

Tables Titles Page

Table 1: UCH Patient Admissions and Deaths during Period of study 20

Table 2: Age and sex distribution of patients 21

Table 3: Frequency of causes of medical coma 25

Table 4: Distribution of predisposing factors according to sex 30

Table 5: Distribution of predisposing factors according to age group 30

Table6 : Distribution of predisposing factors according to socioeconomic status 31

Table 7: Distribution of associated medical condition in medical coma groups 32

Table 8: Co-morbid illnesses associated with stroke. 33

Table 9: Co-morbid illnesses associated with metabolic coma 34

Table 10: Co-morbid illnesses associated with infectious causes of coma 35

Table 11: Shows co-morbid illnesses associated with hypoxic-ischemic coma 36

Table 12: Co-morbid illnesses associated with “other” causes of coma 36

Table 13: Distribution of outcome of individual causes of medical coma 46

Table 14: Multiple response analysis outcome associated with predisposing factors in

medical coma

47

Table 15: Multiple response analysis outcome associated with co-morbid illness in medical

coma

49

Table 16: Outcome due to delay before clinical diagnosis and onset of resuscitation 52

Table 17 Influence of the family support/ knowledge of cause of coma on outcome 54

Table 18 Influence of UCH social welfare support on outcome of coma 55

Page 14: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xiv

Table 19. The predictive value of the GCS 57

Table 20. The predictive value of the brainstem sign score 59

Table 21: Multiple logistic regression 61

Page 15: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xv

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE TITLE PAGE

1 Diagram of brainstem reticular formation 4

2 Distribution of patients according to time to present after coma 22

3 Distribution of predisposing factors according to age group 23

4 Distribution of grouped causes of coma according to sex 27

5 Distribution of grouped causes of coma according age groups 28

6 Distribution of grouped causes of coma according socioeconomic status 29

7 Outcome of coma according to functional levels 37

8 Outcome according to place of onset of coma 38

9 Outcome according to time to present after coma 39

10 Outcome according to mode of referral 40

11 Outcome according to sex of patients 41

12 Outcome according to age groups 42

13 Outcome according to socioeconomic status 43

14 Outcome according to grouped causes of coma 44

15 Outcome according to presence or absence of predisposing factors 48

16 Outcome according to presence or absence of co-morbidity 50

17 Outcome according to hospital admission 51

18 Outcome according to ability to do relevant investigations 53

Page 16: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xvi

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX TITLE Page

I The predictive value of GCS and Brainstem signs scores (BSS) in medical coma 83

II Summary of Brainstem signs 84

III UI/UCH Institutional Review Committee Ethical Clearance Certificate 87

IV Proforma A,B,C 88

V Questionnaire to patients’ relations 95

VI Consent form 97

VII Specific treatments given to the patients

98

Page 17: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xvii

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Coma1-3 is a deep sleep-like state in which a patient is totally unaware of self and surroundings, and cannot be aroused even after vigorous

external stimulation. Such a patient has no sleep-wake cycle and may make inappropriate or no motor response to painful stimuli.

Coma must be distinguished from other altered states of consciousness4-9. Usually these patients can be differentiated from comatose patients

during clinical evaluation.. The conditions are: drowsiness, confusion, encephalopathy, locked-in-state, akinetic mutism, abulia, vegetative state,

minimal conscious state and neuropsychiatric states (catatonia and hysteria).

There are two types of coma2: traumatic (surgical) and nontraumatic (medical) coma. Traumatic coma is mainly due to space occupying

lesions in the brain such as tumors, abscesses, hematomas and hemorrhages. Medical coma arises from various conditions such as drug

intoxications, metabolic disorders, endocrinopathies, severe systemic infections, brain infections, seizures, cardiovascular diseases, stroke and

hematological disorders. It is estimated that about 3 – 15% of admissions to the emergency wards of large municipal hospitals are due to diseases

that cause a disorder of consciousness and coma.

Clinical signs present in comatose patients usually reflect both the cause and different levels of brain damage. The clinical signs of most

localizing value are those affecting forebrain and brainstem functions. These are:

(a) Level of consciousness: Of all the components of the GCS, the motor response to a painful stimulus provides the best indication of the

level of brain damage. A humane form of noxious stimulus (e.g. strong pressure on the supraorbital ridge; sternal angle or big toe nail bed) will

elicit a purposeful movement of the limb towards or away from the painful stimulus in early diencephalic (above thalamus) lesion. If coma is due

to a rapidly enlarging hemispheric mass10,11 brain dysfunction occurs in a progressive rostral to caudal manner; so that motor response in late

diencephalic lesion (below thalamus, but above midbrain) is decorticate posturing. Limb asymmetry may reflect a contralateral hemiparesis.

When brainstem impairment occurs between the levels of rostral poles of red nuclei and vestibular nuclei (subthalamus to midpons), decerebrate

posturing occurs. Further compromise to the level of lower pons and upper medulla elicits no motor responses to pain, although spinal movements

of leg flexion may occur. Metabolic coma does not produce the typical rostral-caudal impairment of brain function, but may produce vigorous

spontaneous extensor rigidity especially after acute hypoxia.

Page 18: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xviii

(b) Brainstem reflexes: As a rule, when brainstem functions particularly pupillary light responses, corneal reflexes and eye movements are

intact, coma must necessarily be ascribed to bilateral hemispheric dysfunction12-16. The converse, however, is not always true as a mass in the

hemispheres may be the proximal cause of coma but nevertheless produces brainstem signs. Brainstem signs can be used to localize lesions as

summarized in appendix I.

1.2 NEUROBIOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND PATHPHYSIOLOGY OF COMA

A normal level of consciousness (wakefulness) depends upon activation of the cerebral hemispheres by neurons located in the brainstem

ascending reticular activating system (ARAS)17. The ARAS is a physiologic system contained within the rostral portion of the reticular formation

(RF). The RF is a group of neurons located bilaterally throughout the length of the brainstem up to the caudal diencephalons (intralaminar and

reticular nuclei of the thalamus), with extensive connections to all parts of the nervous system. In the medulla and pons, the RF lies in the dorsal

part while in the midbrain, it lies in the tegmentum.

The ARAS receives constant excitatory influence from environmental stimuli through somaesthetic, auditory and visual sensory systems

and project same rostrally to the cerebral cortex primarily through thalamic relay nuclei, accomplished by cholinergic and aminergic

neurotransmitters (noradrenaline and serotonin) which act by suppressing some inhibitory cortical pathways. A reduction in alertness is related to

the impairment of the ARAS-thalamo-cortical pathways.

Current biological and clinical evidence indicates that coma reflects the failure, loss or disruption of these specific neural activating

pathways18,19 through diffuse insult to both cerebral hemispheres and/ or upper brainstem from endogenous20,21 exogenous22-25 toxins, extensive

trauma, widespread vascular damage,26-29 increased intracranial pressure11,12 and hypoxia30,31. Figure 1 below is a diagram of brainstem reticular

formation showing its input and output.

Figure 1: Brainstem reticular formation

Page 19: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xix

1.3 DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACH TO COMA

Coma is a challenging medical emergency with a broad differential diagnosis and complex physical presentation. Evaluation should begin

with a rapid visual assessment for a clear airway, intact respiration, intact pulse, possible shock, hypothermia/hyperthermia, and evidence of acute

Page 20: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xx

life-threatening event32,33. In trauma patients, the neck is immobilized until a cervical spine fracture is excluded by cervical spine x-ray. Oxygen

administration, possible intubation and intravenous fluids are instituted. A nasogastric tube should not be placed in a patient with a possible

anterior basilar skull fracture because the tube might penetrate the brain. Random blood glucose check with a glucometer is mandatory.

After respiratory, circulatory, and metabolic abnormalities are stabilised, a more detailed history is obtained and examination performed.

The history should focus on risks for recent toxic exposure, drug overdose, trauma, seizures, metabolic, endocrine, cerebrovascular disease or

brain infections. A thorough laboratory evaluation should be done including computerized tomography (CT) scan of the head and

electrophysiological studies when indicated. Appropriate antidotes35-37 should be administered.

Once the patient is out of immediate danger with appropriate treatment, although still in coma or vegetative state, the medical team will

concentrate on preventing infections and bedsores, providing balanced nutrition and maintaining the patient’s physical state as much as possible.

Physical therapy must also be used to prevent contractures and orthopaedic deformities.

1.4 OUTCOME OF COMA

Coma rarely lasts more than 2 to 4 weeks38. Some patients may regain a degree of awareness after coma (minimal conscious state)39.

However, five levels of functional outcome have been described40,. These are:

i. Good recovery with no or mild disability in which patients may resume all life activities despite minor neurologic and psychological

deficits.

ii. Recovery with moderate disability in which patients remained disabled but independent of others in so far as daily life activities are

concerned.

iii. Recovery with severe disability in which patient is totally dependent on others for daily support because of mental and/or physical

disability.

iv. Vegetative state in which patients remained unresponsive and speechless for weeks or months after acute brain damage, but later open

Page 21: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxi

the eyes and have sleep-wake cycles. Patients who remain in a vegetative state after one month have a 3% likelihood of recovery and

survival after 3years.41,42.

v. Death.

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 EPIDEMIOLOGY OF MEDICAL COMA

Admission figures for medical or nontraumatic coma are as disparate as the causes. In Europe and United States of America (USA), Levy

et al40 reported 500 cases in a 4-year period in a multi-centre study. However, workers in Tanzania42 and Zambia43 reported the higher figures of

100 and 170 cases in 7 and 16 months period respectively. This difference may be a reflection of the socioeconomic environment in which these

studies were carried out and the causes of coma in those places. For example, while cerebrovascular and cardiac arrest44 were the main causes of

coma in the European/USA studies, cerebral infections45 and metabolic disorders were most common causes in the Africans,46 although

cerebrovascular disease is now a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in Africans.29

Medical coma can occur at any age,47 but in studies involving adults, the mean age of occurrence was lower in the Africans (mean age 35

years)48 than in the Caucasians (mean age 60years)49,50, possibly reflecting the causes of coma in these patients. The sex distribution in all the

studies showed a higher male to female ratio at ages below 65years and equal or slight reversal of ratio above the age of 65years.50 This has been

Page 22: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxii

attributed to the occurrence of more risk fact ors for vascular51,metabolic52 and infectious illness in males or more males coming to hospital53.

Many of the African studies reported a bias toward the lower socioeconomic group in the occurrence of medical coma53. Many studies have

postulated that strong family support was predictive of good outcome in coma and vise-visa54,55.

2.2 CAUSES, RISK FACTORS AND CO-MORBID ILLNESSES ASSOCIATED WITH COMA

The cause of coma, location and extent of neural damage have been found to, individually and collectively, influence the outcome of coma.

Generally diseases causing structural brain injury such as subarachnoid haemorrhage28/ intracerebral haemorrhages29 and the large thrombotic

strokes53 produce the worst prognosis, through rapid haematoma formation, massive brain edema, increased intracranial pressure, brainstem

compression and herniation11,12. Prognosis can be improved by massive intracranial pressure (ICP) reduction with 20% mannitol and a loop

diuretic as well as the control of severe hypertension and other risk factors.

Hypoxic – Ischaemic diseases caused by conditions such as status epilepticus56, cardiac arrest severe tetanus57, carbon monoxide poisoning

and septic shock have guarded prognosis which can be predicted from cortico-somatosensory evoked potentials and EEG features within the first

week of injury58.

Metabolic disorders are varied and when well managed carry a very good prognosis40. They include diabetic coma59-64, hypoglycemia65-71

and uremic72,73 and hepatic coma74.

The common causes of CNS infections are meningitides75-79 and cerebral malaria80-81. These conditions have the best outcome if the

patients present early without much co morbid illnesses

Other conditions such as hypertensive encephalopathy83, drug poisoning and the hematological82 disorders also carried good prognosis40 if

they are well managed.

Other factors known to affect prognosis of coma are high risk life style63-64,83, low socioeconomic status and comorbid illnesses such as

pneumonia, urinary tract infection and pressure ulcers84.

2.3 COMA AS AN INDEFENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTOR

Coma, irrespective of cause, has an independent poor prognostic value when compared with other causes of death. In general, coma

Page 23: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxiii

lasting more than 2-4 weeks is associated with many complications, such as pneumonia, decubitus ulcers, malnutrition, deep venous thrombosis

and contractures84. Median prognoses in terms of chance of living for 2 months after diagnosis compiled by the Study to Understand Prognoses

and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT) and the APACHE III were 11% for coma, 17% for lung cancer and 62% for

congestive heart failure85,86.

2.4 COMA SCORING SYSTEMS

Many clinical methods have been developed for the assessment of medical coma55, but reliable criteria for predicting outcome of coma in

these patients in the USA and European studies have been established using the G.C.S 40,87 and brainstem signs88, The G.C.S is simple and

reproducible and can be used by less skilled hospital staff with little inter-observer variability59. Generally, lower G.C.S and abnormal brainstem

responses at admission and/or in the course of coma are established prognostic indices for poor outcome60,89,90. This means that the ability to

accurately predict the outcome of coma using these methods will enable health care providers to reserve the limited and expensive intensive care

facilities for patients with the greatest chance of recovery, especially in developing countries.

Some of the systems which have been developed for the assessment and/or prediction of outcome for both traumatic and non-traumatic coma are:

the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS),43,44,50,56,58. Glasgow Outcome Scale,40 Innsbruck Coma Scale91, Brainstem reflexes,38,39,41,42,50,84, Clinical

Sickness Score for the critically ill92 and the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)55. Among these scoring systems,

the GCS and brainstem functions have been found to be most reliable and have been widely accepted because they are simple, reproducible and of

value in predicting outcome87 in both traumatic and non-traumatic coma. They have also been shown to be of prognostic value in East and Central

Africa in both head injuries and non-traumatic coma43.

2.5 JUSTIFICATION FOR STUDY

The GCS and brainstem functions or any other system for that matter, have their limitations93 and pitfalls88. Therefore, total dependence

on them for predicting coma outcome and determining which patient to initiate or terminate intensive life support may be erroneous94. The

prediction of outcome should be based on a totality of prognostic factors which may be both medical and sociological. This is because the

outcome of a serious illness concerns not only the patient and his family but also the therapeutic teams and the whole community95 - 97.

Page 24: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxiv

Coma is one of the most common problems in general medicine and certainly the commonest neurological emergency1. On the scale of

intensity of ill health proposed by the New York economists, death occupies the bottom place, with coma just above it39. It is as legendary as

death. For the patient and family members, it may be worse than death; because of the continuing distress this state causes to those who witness it.

In economic terms, it is certainly “more costly than death” because complete dependence can last for many months and sometimes years90.

Although coma, irrespective of cause, has an independent poor prognostic value when compared with other causes of death,85 the outcome has

remained largely uncertain,44. This is because many comatose patients with initial erroneous prediction of poor outcome have recovered with

appropriate treatment. Uncertainty about the outcome of coma and implicit estimates of prognosis in the absence of well established facts have

hampered approach to patient management and added to the difficulty which doctors’ experience in making decisions about coma patients94-96.

Therefore the identification and possible stratification of prognostic factors in medical coma will facilitate the ability to predict its final outcome.

This may offer physicians, patient’s families and health planners information that may prove useful in patient care decisions55 and resource

allocation96.

2.6 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

A. General: To determine the factors that affects the prognosis of medical coma in the University College Hospital, Ibadan

B. Specific

i. To determine the influence of socio-demographic factors on outcome of coma

ii. To determine the etiological factors associated with coma in UCH Ibadan

iii. To determine the outcome of coma using the Glasgow Coma Scale and brainstem functions.

Page 25: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxv

CHAPTER THREE

METHODOLOGY

3.1 STUDY PERIOD: This research was a prospective study of patients who presented to the University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan in

medical coma from August 2004 to March 2005. It was done with the permission of the UI/UCH Institutional Review Committee. (Appendix II)

3.2 STUDY SITE : UCH Ibadan is the premier teaching hospital in Nigeria which was founded in 1948. Ibadan is said to be the largest town

in West Africa with a population of more than one million people. Most of the patients seen in the hospital were mainly from Ibadan township and

neighbouring towns and villages in the Western part of Nigeria.

The hospital has a well-organised Accident and Emergency (A&E) unit under the supervision of a Consultant General Surgeon, but all the clinical

subspecialties are well represented. Patients admitted there are usually transferred to the wards or intensive care unit (ICU), as the case may be,

within 24 hours.

The ICU has 4-beds, cardiac monitors, mechanical ventilators etc. It is under the supervision of a Consultant Anesthetist. Patients admitted into

the ICU are jointly managed by the primary physicians and the anesthetists.

There are 5 medical wards shared by the seven units of neurology, dermatology gastroenterology nephrology, cardiology, endocrinology and

respiratory medicine. Patients recruited for this study were admitted and managed under the consultants in each of these units, but the author

participated actively in the management of the patients with the consent of the primary physician.

3.3 STUDY POPULATION

3.3.1 Sample size: The sample size of 200 used for the study was determined using the

formula,101 N = z2 Pq where

d2

N = the desired sample size (when population is greater than 10,000)

Z = the standard normal deviate at 95% confidence level (1.96)

P = admission rate of coma in literature1,3

Page 26: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxvi

d2 = degree of accuracy at 0.05

q = 1.0 – p = (1.0 - 0.15) 0.85

N = 1.96 x 1.96 x 0.15 x 0.85 = 0.489804 = 195.92 approximated to 200.0

0.05 x 0.05 0.0025

to take care of losses or referrals

3.3.2 INCLUSION CRITERIA

i. Consecutive patients, 16 years and above, admitted in medical coma to either the A and E unit, the medical wards or the ICU

ii. The patient’s level of consciousness as determined by the author at initial assessment must be G.C.S score of 8 or below i.e. eye

opening of 2 or less, verbal response of 2 or less and best motor response of 4 or less (see appendix III, proforma C).

3.3.3. EXCLUSION CRITERIA

i. Patients with traumatic coma

ii. Patients with altered states of consciousness with GCS score above 8

iii. Delayed recovery from anesthesia

3.4 STUDY PROCEDURE

3.4.1 Clinical assessment: All the patients who met the inclusion criteria had detailed clinical evaluation (i.e. history, physical and neurological

examinations) on initial presentation, 6 hours later, then daily for 7 days, on the 14th, 21st and 28 days respectively, using the format in appendix

III, proforma A,B,C. The outcome at the end of the 28th day was recorded4,38 as good recovery with no or mild deficit, moderate or severe

deficit, vegetative or death.

The results of laboratory, radiological and electrophysiological investigations were also noted and recorded in proforma D.

3.4.2 Questionnaires to evaluate reasons for outcome

On the 28th, day a questionnaire was administered on one of the patient’s guardian (Appendix IV) for an independent assessment of factors

likely to have affected the outcome of coma. This was done after informed consent was obtained from the respondents (appendix V). The

Page 27: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxvii

information derived from the questionnaires was corroborated with the observations and records made by the author on the patient.

3.4.3 Summary of clinical information

All the information and observations made on the patient were used to confirm the date of definitive diagnosis, cause of coma, type of

outcome and date of outcome. (Appendix III, proforma E).

3.4.4 Diagnostic criteria The diagnoses were generally based on standard criteria with appropriate modifications where necessary, thus,.

A. Cerebral Infections:

i. Meningitidis: 23,24,

Trial of fever, headache and maningeal irritations.

CSF abnormalities (pleocytosis, high protein level, low glucose level)

Isolation of microorganism from CSF.

ii. Cerebral malaria78

High grade fever and anemia

Positive asexual forms of plasmodium falciparum on blood smear.

B Metabolic disorders:

i. Diabetic coma:

Hyperglycemia, dehydration.

± serum hyperosmolatity and ketonuria

ii. Hypoglycemic coma65-67

History of oral hypoglycemic agents ingestion or insulin injection without eating or alcohol abuse.

Sweating, tachycardia + seizures and

Blood sugar of < 4.0mg/dL (2.2mmol/L)

Page 28: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxviii

iii. Hepatic coma (grade IV encephalopathy)98:

Jaundice, hepatic fetor.

Deranged prothrombin time and abnormal liver enzyme levels and

Ultrasound proven liver diseases.

iv. Uremic coma72,73.

Facial swelling, oliguria + and hypertension

Pallor, brown nails, bruising, excoriations, retinopathy, pericarditis, pulmonary or peripheral odema etc.

Anemia (normocytic, normochromic); serum urea of 35mmo/L, creatinine of >900umol/L and bicarbonate of < 15mmol/L respectively,

normal, creatinine clearance of <15ml/min/1.73m2

C. Cerebrovascular disease

i. Intracerebral hemorrhage and large infarctive stroke (middle cerebral artery stroke)

Severe headache, vomiting, rapid loss of consciousness, + seizures.

Severe hypertension, focal neurological deficits

CT brain evidence.

ii. Hypertensive encephalopathy83

Fluctuating levels of consciousness, ± convulsion

Severe hypertension, grade IV retinopathy

CT brain evidence of diffuse edema of cerebral hemispheres.

D. Cardiac arrest:

Sudden onset of loss of consciousness; apnoea and cardiogenic shock

ECG evidence

E. Status epilepticus

Page 29: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxix

Known epileptics.

Prolonged convulsions with non-recovery of consciousness for more than 30 minutes.

EEG showed evidence of epileptic-form activities.

Blood glucose and electrolytes were normal.

F. Sepsis syndrome (sepsis, septic shock, multiple organ failure and severe anemia). The clinical presentations were variable but diagnoses

were based on the presence of temperature > 380C or < 360C, heart rate > 100 beats per minute, respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minutes,

leucocytosis, anaemia, hypotension, oliguria and evidence of multiple organ dysfunction

G. Other causes

i. Primary CNS lymphoma:

HIV seropositive CD4+ count <100 cells/µl.

CT scan showed high density enhancing mass(es) in the cerebral parenchyma.

ii. Gamalline poisoning: This was a 25 year old male who attempted committing suicide by drinking gamaline. This was confirmed

by the relations and identified by the pharmacy department.

iii. Osmotic demyelination syndrome was diagnosed in a 36 year old taxi driver who was a known alcoholic and who fell into coma

after a drinking bout. He had clinical features of bilateral ventral pontine hypodense lesion on CT Scan. He was referred from a

private hospital where he had some intravenous fluids for more than 24 hours before referral. His serum Na+ was at lower limit of

normal. There was no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmation of diagnosis.

3.4.5 Management

A. Resuscitation: After an initial quick assessment of the patient’s level of consciousness and vital signs, clear airway was ensured by proper

positioning and suction of secretions. Oropharyngeal tube was put in place for patients with spontaneous regular breathing to prevent aspiration

and endotracheal intubation for patients with cardiopulmonary arrest.

Oxygen was administered through tubes connected to the nostrils or to the endotracheal tubes. Blood was taken for blood sugar and other

investigations and intravenous fluid (normal saline or dextrose infusion) given to support the circulation. 50ml of 50% dextrose in double dilutions

Page 30: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxx

was given in hypoglycemic coma. Appropriate emergency drug treatment was also administered to the patients. Nasogastric tube was passed for

aspiration of gastric contents and left in-situ for feeding and oral drug administration. Urethral catheter was passed for proper monitoring of urine

output.

B. Specific treatment All the patients' were admitted and managed under the admitting unit consultants under a treatment protocol for the

unit. The patients’ laboratory investigations, treatments and nursing care were monitored by the author to decipher whether or not patients had

standard medical and nursing care. The specific treatments given to the patients are explained in appendix VII.

3.5 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data obtained was analysed electronically using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The double entry method was used to

ensure accuracy. Subsequently, a frequency distribution of all variables was carried out as part of data exploration and clearing efforts. Relevant

tables to the study objectives were constructed and appropriate statistical tests were used to investigate the significance of any relationship

between variables. Means and standard deviation were used to describe continuous variables and proportions were used for discontinuous or

categorised data.

The Student ‘t’ test was used to compare means of two continuous variables while the Pearson Chi-Square test was used to determine

significance of association between proportions or groups. Fisher’s exact test was used in place of Chi-Square test where the number in cells was

less than 5. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

The predictive value of both GCS and brainstem signs score (BSS) was calculated using the 2 by 2 contigency table (see Appendix VI).

The critical BSS below which death can be predicted with some certainty and above which survival can also be well predicted was determined by

using the nonparametric Wilcoxon Rank Sum/Mann – Whitney-U test. All significant variables were subjected to multiple logistic regression

analysis to determine the most significant ones.

Page 31: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxi

CHAPTER FOUR

RESULTS

4.1 Incidence of medical coma in UCH Ibadan

Medical coma accounted for 9.8% of emergency admissions, 3.1% of total hospital admissions and 16.8% of total hospital deaths during

the study period. The details of emergency admissions, total hospital admissions and deaths during the study period are shown in Table 1 below.

Table1: UCH Patient Admissions and Deaths during Period of study

Source: Statistics Unit, Medical Records Department, UCH, Ibadan

Month Year Emergency

admissions

Total hospital

admissions

Total hospital

deaths

August

September

October

November

December

January

February

March

2004

2004

2004

2004

2004

2005

2005

2005

359

321

330

250

68

48

325

332

1092

1062

1031

927

217

145

989

1079

177

133

141

123

52

17

119

144

Total 2033 6548 906

% Medical Coma

Page 32: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxii

admissions and

deaths to

9.8% 3.1% 16.8%

4.2 SOCIO DEMOGRAPHY OF DATA

4.2.1 Sex and age distribution

Two hundred (200) comatose patients of medical aetiology were consecutively studied. There were 132 males and 64 females, giving a

male: female ratio of 2:1. The mean age of all the patients was 50+18years, the males being slightly but insignificantly younger (49.5+16.1 years)

than the females (50.9+20.9 years). (t=-0.514, P>0.05). The age group 40-59 years formed the largest population of 38.5% closely followed by

those above 60 years old (34%). The <39 years age group were the least affected with 27.5%. This distribution is shown in table 2 below.

Table 2: Age and sex distribution

Age (years) Male(%) Female(%) Total(%) t-test P-value

<20

20-39

1(0.5)

30(15.0)

-

24(12)

1(0.5)

55(27.5)

40 – 59 62(31) 15(7.5) 77(38.5) -0.514 0.608

>60 39(19.5) 29(14.5) 68(34)

Total 132(66) 68(34) 200(100)

Mean 49.5±16.1 50.9±20.9 50±17.8

Page 33: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxiii

4.2.2 Time to present to UCH after coma

Of the one hundred and twenty eight (64%) who were brought to UCH in coma, only thirty eight (19%) were brought within 6 hours while

ninety (45%) were brought in after 6 hours (p=0.000). 14.5% of those who presented less than 6 hours were brought in by their relatives, while the

remaining (4.5%) were refrred from private hospitals. On the other hand, of the 45% who were brought in after 6 hours sixty five (32.5%) were

referred from private hospitals, while 12.5% were brought in by relatives (p= 0.000). Thus showing a significant difference in the mode of referral

and time of presentation to UCH (p <0.05). This is shown in figure 2.

4.3 DISTRIBUTION OF CAUSES OF MEDICAL COMA

4.3.1 Distribution of medical coma groups

Fig 2: Distribution of patients according to mode and time of presentation after coma

14.5

4.5

12.5

32.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Relatives Private hospital Time to present P<0.05

Percentage Before 6hrs After 6hrs

Page 34: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxiv

The various grouped causes of medical coma and their distribution are shown in figure 3. The commonest cause was metabolic (35.5%),

followed by cerebrovascular or stroke (33%), infections (22%), hypoxic-ischemic (5%) and others (4.5%).

4.3.2 Frequency of causes of medical coma

Hemorrhagic stroke was the cause in 26% of the patients, followed by diabetic (DM) coma (12.5%), uremic coma and meningitides with 12%

each, infarctive stroke (7%), sepsis syndrome and hepatic coma (6% each) and hypoglycemia (5%).

Fig 3: Distribution of causes of coma in groups

35%

33%

22%

5% 5%

Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic Others

Page 35: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxv

Table 3 below shows the details of causes including others less than 4%.

Table 3: Frequency of causes of medical coma

CAUSES TOTAL PERCENTAGE

1. bHemorrhagic stroke 52 26

2. a1DM coma 25 12.5

3. aUremic coma 24 12

Page 36: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxvi

4. cMeningitides 24 12

5. bInfarctive stroke 14 7

6. cSepsis syndrome 12 6

7. aHepatic coma 12 6

8. aHypoglycemia 10 5

9. cPara meningitides 6 3

10. dCardiac arrest 5 2.5

11. eCNS lymphoma 5 2.5

12 dHypovolemic shock 3 1.5

13. cCerebral malaria 2 1

14. dStatus epilepticus 2 1

15. eHypertensive encephalopathy 1 0.5

16. eGamalline poisoning 1 0.5

17. eOsmotic demyelination syndrome 1 0.5

18. eUnknown 1 0.5

a = metabolic a1 = DKA = 4

b = stroke HONK = 21

c = infections

d = hypoxic-ischemic

e = others

4.3.3 Distribution of causes of coma according to sex (See fig 4)

(i) Metabolic Coma: The male: female ratio in this group in descending order were diabetic (5.5%:70%), uremic (7.5%:4.5%), hepatic

(4.5%:1.5%) and hypoglycemic (3.5%:1.5%) coma, showing an overall male: female ratio of 21%:14.5%

(ii) Cerebrovascular: The male: female ratio of causes of coma in this group were hemorrhagic (21.5%:4.5%) and large infarctive (3.5%:3.5%)

Page 37: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxvii

strokes, showing an overall male: female ratio of 25%:8%

(iii)Infections showed an overall male predominance with a male to female ratio of 13%:9%, made up of meningitides (8%:4%), sepsis syndrome

(3%:3%), parameningitides/ brain abscess (1.5%:1.5%) and cerebral malaria (0.5%:0.5%).

(iv) Hypoxic-ischemic coma: The overall male to female ratio in this group was (2.5%:2.5%). Cardiac arrest (1.5%:1.0%) was the highest cause,

followed by hypovolemic shock (0.5%:1.0%) and lastly status epilepticus (0.5%:0.5%)

(v) Unknown cause: Was 0.5% (male)

(vi) Others: This group was made up of CNS lymphoma (2.5%), hypertensive encephalopathy (0.5%), osmotic demyelination syndrome (0.5%),

gamalline poisoning (0.5%). There was no female in this group.

4.3.4 Distribution of causes of coma according to age groups (see fig. 5).

Fig 4:Distribution of grouped causes according to sex

21

25

13

2.5

4.5

19.5

8 9

2.5

0 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic Others Causes P>0.005

Percentage

male female

Page 38: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxviii

In metabolic coma, the ≥60yrs (elderly) had a slight dominance of 12.5% over the middle aged(40-49yrs) and the youth (<39yrs) with

11.5% each respectively. In coma due to strokes, the % distribution for the age groups (arranged in descending order of ≥60yrs, 40-59yrs, <39yrs)

were 17.0, 12.5 and 3.5 respectively. Individual causes were distributed as follows: hemorrhagic stroke(11.5, 11 and 3.5); infarctive stroke (5.5,

1.5 and 0).

In coma due to infections, the % distribution is descending order of age groups (as above) were 3, 10.5 and 8.5 respectively with the

middle age group forming the majority. The infections were distributed as follows: meningitides (0,5.5,6.5), sepsis syndrome (3.0, 2.5,0.5); para-

meningitides (0, 0,1) and cerebral malaria(0,0,1)

In hypoxic-ischemic coma, the % distribution in the age groups (in descending order as above) were 1,1.5 and 2.5 respectively with the youth

forming the majority.

These were due to cardiac arrest (0,0.5,2); hypovolemic shock (1,0,0.5) and status epilepticus (0,1,0)

Unknown cause: (0.5%) in a middle age man only.

In the miscellaneous group, majority of the cases occurred in the middle aged as shown by the % distribution of 0.5, 2.5 and 1.5 in the descending

order of age groups (as above). These were due to CNS lymphoma (0,1.5,1.0), hypertensive encephalopathy (0.5,0,0); osmotic demyelination

syndrome (0,0.5,0); and gamalline poisoning(0,0,0.5) respectively

Page 39: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xxxix

4.3.5 Distribution of causes of coma according to socioeconomic status (see figure 6)

The dominance of the self employed group mostly artisans, taxi drivers and the petty traders over the others was seen in all the coma groups

except the hypoxic-ischemic coma, where the none gainfully employed was in majority with 3%, to the 1.5% and 0.5% for self employed and

government employed groups respectively. Put together the self employed and unemployed constituted 90% of the study population thereby

giving a statistically significant result. This is illustrated in figure 6 below.

Fig 5:Distribution of grouped causes of coma according to age groups

11.5

3.5

8.5

2.5 1.5

11.5 12.5

10.5

1.5 2.5

12.5

17

3

1 1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic Others Causes

Percentage <=39 40-59 >=60

Page 40: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xl

4.4 DISTRIBUTION OF PREDISPOSING FACTORS

Multiple responses analysis of predisposing factors in table 4 revealed the presence of hypertension (38.5%), diabetes mellitus (14%),

HIV(11.5%), alcohol abuse (8.5%), old age (7%), obesity (7%), hepatitis B surface antigen (6%) and substances abuse (tobacco, marijuana, herbal

remedies) (4%) as the significant factors.

4.4.1 Sex: There was an overall predominance of these factors in males with the exception of old age. Alcohol and substance abuse were absent

in females. This is shown in table 4.

Table 4: Distribution of predisposing factors according to sex

Characteristics HT (%) DM

(%)

HIV

(%)

Alcohol

Abuse

(%)

Old

Age

(%)

Obesity

(%)

HbsAg

(%)

Subst

Abuse

(%)

Sex

Male

55(27.5)

19(9.5)

16(8)

17(8.5)

6(3)

9(4.5)

8(4)

8(4)

Fig 6:Distribution of grouped causes of coma according to socioeconomic status

18.5

17

12

1.5

3.5

7.5

6

4.5

0.5 0.5

9.5 10

5.5

3

0.5 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic Others Causes

Percentage Self employed Govt employed None

Page 41: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xli

Female

Total

22(11)

77(38.5)

9(4.5)

28(14)

7(3.5)

23(11.5)

-

17(8.5)

8(4)

14(7)

7(3.5)

14(7)

4(2)

12(6)

-

8(4)

4.4.2 Age group: hypertension, substance abuse, alcohol abuse and hepatitis B surface antigen were seen in all age groups except the <20yrs.

This is shown in table 5 below.

Table 5 : Distribution of predisposing factors according to age group

Characteristics HT (%) DM

(%)

HIV

(%)

Alcohol

Abuse

(%)

Old

Age

(%)

Obesity

(%)

HbsAg

(%)

Subst

Abuse

(%)

Age

<20

20 -39

40-59

>60

Total

-

9(4.5)

31(15.5)

37(18.5)

77(38.5)

-

3(1.5)

9(4.5)

16(8)

28(14)

-

12(6)

11(5.5)

-

23(11.5)

-

3(1.5)

12(6)

2(1)

17(8.5)

-

-

-

14(7)

14(7)

-

-

6(3)

8(4)

14(7)

-

3(1.5)

6(3)

3(1.5)

12(6)

-

2(1)

3(1.5)

3(1.5)

8(4)

4.4.3 Socioeconomic status: All the factors were seen in the 3 groups of self-employed, government employed and none employed. Old age was

absent in the government employed. The self-employed had an overall higher risk for all the factors followed by the none employed. This is shown

in table 6 below.

Table 6: Distribution of predisposing factors according to socioeconomic status

Characteristics HT (%) DM

(%)

HIV

(%)

Alcohol

Abuse

(%)

Old

Age

(%)

Obesity

(%)

HbsAg

(%)

Subst

Abuse

(%)

Page 42: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xlii

Socioeconomic

status

Self employed

Govt.employed

None

Total

40(20)

11(5.5)

26(13)

77(38.5)

14(7)

7(3.5)

7(3.5)

28(14)

11(5.5)

9(4.5)

3(1.5)

23(11.50

11(5.5)

4(2)

2(1)

17(8.5)

10(5)

-

4(2)

14(7)

8(4)

2(1)

4(2)

14(7)

7(3.5)

4(2)

1(0.5)

12(6)

3(1.5)

3(1.5)

2(1)

8(4)

4.4.3 Predisposing/Associated Diseases (see table 7 below)

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were strongly associated with metabolic coma and stroke. Other conditions were hepatitis B surface

antigens, substance abuse including alcohol , obesity and old age.

HIV was strongly associated with mening-encephalitidis and CNS lymphoma. This is shown in detail in table 7 below.

Table 7: Distribution of associated medical condition in medical coma groups

Characteristics HT (%) DM

(%)

HIV

(%)

Alcohol

Abuse

(%)

Old

age

(%)

Obesity

(%)

HbsAg

(%)

Subst

abuse

(%)

Cause of Coma

Metabolic

CVD

Infection

Hypoxic-

ischemic

Others

11(5.5)

66(33)

-

-

-

16(8)

9(4.5)

2(1)

1(0.5)

-

3(1.5)

-

15(7.5)

-

5(2.5)

3(1.5)

9(4.5)

3(1.5)

-

2(1)

2(1)

8(4)

4(2)

-

-

2(1)

12(6)

-

-

-

13(6.5)

-

-

-

-

3(1.5)

2(1)

3(1.5)

-

-

Page 43: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xliii

4.5 DISTRIBUTION OF CO-MORBID ILLNESS(ES) COMPLICATING MEDICAL COMA(MULTIPLE RESPONSES

ANALYSIS)

4.5.1 Stroke: Aspiration pneumonia was the commonest co-morbid illness (18%), followed by recurrent seizures (5.5%), hyperglycemia (5%),

sepsis(4%). Other co-morbid illness were <4%. This is shown in table 8 below.

Table 8: Co-morbid illnesses associated with stroke.

Co-morbidity Stroke

Aspiration pneumonia 36(18)

Recurrent seizures 11(5.5)

Hyperglycemia 10(5)

Sepsis 8(4)

Chest urinary tract infection 6(3)

Acute pulmonary edema 5(2.5)

Acute renal failure 4(2)

Recurrent stroke 3(1.5)

Anaemia 2 (1)

Liver cirrhosis 2(1)

4.5.2 Metabolic Coma: Hypertension was the commonest co-morbidity (11%) followed by sepsis (6.5%), liver cirrhosis (6%), acute pulmonary

oedema and anemia (4.5% each). The other illnesses occurred in frequencies <4%. This is shown in table 9 below.

Table 9: Co-morbid illnesses associated with metabolic coma

Co-morbidity Metabolic

Hypertension 22 (11)

Sepsis 13 (6.5)

Liver cirrhosis 12 (6)

Recurrent seizures 9 (4.5)

Page 44: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xliv

Anaemia 9 (4.5)

Acute pulmonary edema 9 (4.5)

Acute renal failure 6 (3)

Aspiration pneumonia 6(3)

Chest urinary tract infection 5 (2.5)

Hyperglycemia 2 (1)

Recurrent stroke 1 (0.5)

4.5.3. Coma due to infectious cases: Hyperglycemia was the commonest co-morbid illness (4%), followed closely by acute renal failure and

anemia with 3.5% each, aspiration pneumonia and recurrent seizures with 3% each. Liver cirrhosis, acute pulmonary edema and chest/urinary tract

infections occurred in 2%, 1% and 0.5% respectively.

Table 10: Co-morbid illness associated with infectious causes of coma

Co-morbidity Infection

Hyperglycemia 8 (4)

Anaemia 7 (3.5)

Acute renal failure 7 (3.5)

Aspiration pneumonia 6(3)

Recurrent seizures 6 (3)

Hypertension 5 (2.5)

Liver cirrhosis 4 (2)

Acute pulmonary edema 2 (1)

Chest urinary tract infection 1 (0.5)

4.5.4. Hypoxic-ischemic coma: Aspiration pneumonia, hypertension and sepsis were found in each of 1.5% of patients while hyperglycemia,

anaemia and liver cirrhosis occurred in 1%, 0.5% and 0.5% of the patients respectively as shown below.

Table 11: Co-morbid illnesses associated with hypoxic-ischemic coma

Co-morbidity Hypoxic-ischemic coma

Aspiration pneumonia 3 (1.5)

Page 45: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xlv

Hypertension 3 (1.5)

Sepsis 3 (1.5)

Hyperglycemia 2 (1)

Anaemia 1 (0.5)

Liver cirrhosis 1 (0.5)

4.5.5 Others: Recurrent seizures was the commonest co-morbid illness, (2%) followed by sepsis (1.5%), aspiration pneumonia (1%),

hypertension (0.5%), anemia (0.5%) and liver cirrhosis (0.5%).

Table 12: Co-morbid illnesses associated with “other” causes of coma

Co-morbidity Others

Recurrent seizures 4 (2)

Sepsis 3 (1.5)

Aspiration pneumonia 2 (1)

Hypertension 1 (0.5)

Anaemia 1 (0.5)

Liver cirrhosis 1 (0.5)

4.6 OUTCOME OF MEDICAL COMA

4.6.1 General outcome (according to functional levels) see fig 7

152 of the 200 patients studied died giving an overall mortality rate of 76%. Among the forty eight (24%) patients that survived, twenty

two (11%) had good recovery with no functional deficit, ten (5%) had moderate disability, twelve (6%) had severe disability and four (2%) went

into vegetable state.

Page 46: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xlvi

4.6.2 Sociodemographic characteristics

i. Outcome of coma based on place of onset. Mortality was higher in the patients who became unconscious in the hospital at the rate

of 80.6% compared to 73.4% recorded for those who were brought unconscious from outside the hospital. Figure 8 below illustrates this

difference which was not statistically significant. X2 = 1.28, P = 0.258.

Fig 7:Outcome according to functional levels

11

5 6 2

76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Good recovery Recovery+mod. disability Recovery+severe disability Vegetative Death Outcome

Percentage

Page 47: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xlvii

ii. Outcome of coma according time to present to UCH Mortality was higher at 76.7% for the patients who were brought after 6hours in

contrast to 63.2% mortality rate in those who were brought in within 6hours. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

X2 2.45, P = 0.117. Figure 9 below illustrates this distribution.

Fig 8:Distribution according to place of onset of coma

26.6

19.4

73.4

80.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Out of hospital Inside hospital Place of onset P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 48: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xlviii

iii. Outcome of coma according to mode of referral to UCH (see figure 10 below)

The mortality rate of 75.7% recorded in patients who were referred from private hospitals was higher than 68.5% recorded in those who were

brought in by their relatives, although the difference was not significant. (X2 = 0.8, P = 0.37)

Fig 9: Distribution of outcome according to time of presentation

36.8

23.3

63.2

76.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<6hrs >6hrs Presentation time P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 49: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xlix

4.6.3 Distribution of outcome based on patients characteristics

i. Sex: Of the one hundred and fifty two (76%) deaths recorded, one hundred and four (52%) were males while forty eight (24%)

were females giving a mortality rate of 78.8% and 70.6% respectively. However, the difference was not statistically significant, (X2 =1.65,

P = 0.198) as shown in figure 11 below.

Fig10:Distrbution of outcome according to mode of referral

31.5

24.3

68.5

75.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Relatives Private hospitals Mode of referral P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 50: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

l

ii. Age group Mortality was highest in the 40-59 age group with 80.5% followed closely by the > 60 years old with 76.5% and those <39

years with 69.1%. However there was no significant difference in the mortality rate, as they were a reflection of the population of the age groups

in the study. Figure 12 below illustrates the outcome according to age group.

Fig 11:Distribution of outcome according to sex

21.2

29.4

78.8

70.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

male female Sex P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 51: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

li

iii. Socioeconomic status: The mortality rates also reflected the proportional representation of the different groups. The self-employed had the

highest rate of 81% followed by the civil servants with 79% and the none employed with the lowest rate of 65%. (X2 = 5.45, P = 0.66) as shown in

figure 13 below.

Fig 12: Distribution of outcome according to age group

30.9

19.5 23.5

69.1

80.5 76.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

<=39 40-59 >=60 Age group P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 52: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lii

4.6.4 Distribution of outcome according to grouped causes

Infections had the highest mortality rate of 86.6%, followed closely by stroke (83.3%), metabolic coma (67.6%), hypoxic ischaemic coma

(60%) and lastly the miscellaneous group (44.4%) as shown in figure 14.

Fig 13:Distribution of socioeconomic status according to outcome

19 21

35

81 79

65

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Self employed Govt employed None Socioeconomic status P>0.005

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 53: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

liii

4.6.5 Distribution of outcome of individual causes of medical coma

Hepatic coma, para-meningitides, hypovolemic shock and unknown cause had mortality of 100% while meningitides had mortality of

91.7%, followed by hemorrhagic stroke (88.5%), uremic coma and sepsis syndrome with 83.3% each. Infarctive stroke, diabetic coma and cardiac

arrest had 60% each. Others had less than 50% mortality as shown in table 13.

Table 13: Distribution of outcome of individual causes of medical coma

CAUSES Alive Dead Total % Mortality %

1. aHepatic coma - 12 12 6 100

2. cPara meningitides - 6 6 3 100

3. dHypovolemic shock - 3 3 1.5 100

4. eUnknown - 1 1 0.5 100

5. cMeningitides 2 22 24 12 91.7

6. B Hemorrhagic stroke 6 46 52 26 88.5

7. aUremic coma 4 20 24 12 83.3

Fig 14:Distribution of outcome according to grouped causes

32.4

16.7 13.4

40

55.6

67.6

83.3 86.6

60

44.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic Others Causes

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 54: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

liv

8. cSepsis syndrome 2 10 12 6 83.3

9. bInfarctive stroke 5 9 14 7 64.3

10. a1DM coma 10 15 25 12.5 60

11. dCardiac arrest 2 3 5 2.5 60

12 eCNS lymphoma 2 3 5 2.5 60

13. cCerebral malaria 1 1 2 1 50

14. aHypoglycemia 9 1 10 5 10

15. eHypertensive

encephalopathy

1 1 0.5

16. eGamalline poisoning 1 1 0.5

17. dStatus epilepticus 2 2 1

18. eOsmotic demyelination

syndrome

1 1 0.5

Alive Dead

a = metabolic a1 = DKA = 4: 0

b = stroke HONK = 6: 15

c = infections

d = hypoxic-ischemic. e = others

4.6.6 Multiple response analysis of outcome associated with presence of predisposing factors

i. Substance abuse was associated with a worst outcome of 100% followed by HIV with 95.2%, hepatitis B surface antigen, (92.3%),

diabetes mellitus (86%), hypertension (83.1%), alcohol abuse (82.4%), old age (78.6%) and lastly obesity with 64.3%. This is shown in

table 14 below.

Table 14: Outcome associated with predisposing factors

Characteristics HT (%) DM

(%)

HIV (%) Alcohol

(%)

Old

age(%)

Obesity

(%)

HbsAg(%) Subst

abuse(%)

Outcome

Alive

Dead

Total

13(6.5)

64(32)

77(38.5)

4(2)

24(12)

28(14)

2(1)

21(10.5)

23(11.5)

3(1.5)

14(7)

17(8.5)

3(1.5)

11(5.5)

14(7)

5(2.5)

9(4.5)

14(7)

1(0.5)

12(6)

13(6.5)

-

8(4)

8(4)

Page 55: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lv

Good outcome %

Poor outcome %

16.9

83.1

14

86.0

4.8

95.2

17.6

82.4

21.4

78.6

35.7

64.3

7.7

92.3

-

100

4.6.7 Comparison of outcome between patients with and those without predisposing factors.

In general, when the outcome between patients with predisposing factors was compared with those without those factors, it was found to

be statistically insignificant (p >0.05). This is shown figure 15.

4.6.8 Multiple response analysis of co-morbid illness: Liver cirrhosis was associated with the worst outcome rate of 95.0%, followed by acute

renal failure (88.2%), aspiration pneumonia (84.9%); sepsis (81.5%), anaemia and chest/urinary tract infections (80% each), hyperglycemia

(77.3%) hypertension (64.5%), acute pulmonary edema (55.6%) and recurrent stroke (50%). This is shown in table 15

Table 15: Multiple response analysis outcome associated with co-morbid illnesses in medical coma

Co-morbidity Alive

(%)

Dead (%) Total (%) Good

outcome %

Poor

outcome %

Fig 15: Distribution of outcome according to presence/absence of predisposing factors

23.4

37.5

76.6

62.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

present absent Risk factors P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 56: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lvi

Liver cirrhosis 1 (0.5) 9 (9.5) 20 (10) 5 95

Acute renal failure 2 (1) 15 (7.5) 17 (8.5) 18.8 88.2

Aspiration pneumonia 8 (4) 45 (22.5) 53 (26.5) 15.1 84.9

Sepsis 5 (2.5) 22 911) 27 (13.5) 18.5 81.5

Anaemia 4 92) 16 (8) 20 (10) 20 80

Chest/urinary tract

infection

2 (1) 8 (4) 10 (5) 20 80

Hyperglycemia 5 (2.5) 17 (8.5) 22 911) 22.7 77.3

Hypertension 11 (5.5) 20 (10) 31 (15.5) 35.5 64.5

Recurrent seizures 11 (5.) 19 (9.5) 30 (15) 36.7 63.3

Acute pulmonary edema 4 (2) 5 (7.5) 9 (4.5) 45.4 55.6

11.Recurrent stroke 2 (1) 2 (1) 4 (2) 50 50

4.6.9 Comparison of outcome in patients with and those without co-morbid illnesses

In general, a total of one hundred and eighty four (92%) of the patients had a co-morbid illness while sixteen (8%) had none. However the

difference in the outcome in term of survival was statistically insignificant between the 2 groups. (X2 = 0.501, P=0.479) as shown in fig 16.

Page 57: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lvii

4.6.10 Outcome of medical intervention:

i. Hospital admission: Of the 84.5% of the patients admitted in to the medical ward, 63.5% of them died while 21% survived, giving a

mortality rate of 75.1%. 10% of the 12.5% admitted in the A & E died, giving a mortality rate of 80%, while 2.5% of the 3% admitted in

the ICU died, giving a mortality rate of 83.3%. However, these was not significantly different, x2 = 0.464, p=0.793. The distribution of

outcome according to hospital admission is shown in fig 17.

Fig 16: Distribution of outcome according to presence/absence of co-morbidity

23.4

31.2

76.6

68.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

present absent Co-morbidity P>0.005

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 58: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lviii

ii. Time before clinical diagnosis and onset of resuscitation

More than two third (79.5%) of the patients had their medical condition diagnosed within 24 hours, yet about 58.5% of this number died

giving a mortality rate of 73.6%. Of the 20.5% that has delayed diagnosis of more than 24 hours, 17.5% died, giving a mortality of 85.4%,

however this difference was not statistically significant to the outcome of coma. (X2 = 2.48, P = 0.115) Also, almost all the patients (99%)

had resuscitative measures started < 1 hour of becoming unconscious in the wards or presentation to A & E or ICU, but this did not

translate into lower mortality as 75.5% of them died. (X2 = 0.749, P =0.382). See table 16 for details

Table 16 Outcome due to delay before clinical diagnosis and onset of resuscitation

Hours before diagnosis Alive (%) Dead (%)

Total Mortality

rate

X2 P-value

<24hrs

>24hrs

Total

42(21)

6(3)

48(24)

117(58.5)

35(17.5)

152(76)

159(79.5)

41(20.5)

200(100)

73.6

85.4

2.48

0.115

Fig 17:Distribution of outcome according to hospital admission

24.9 20

16.7

75.1 80

83.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

MW A&E ICU Hospital admission P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 59: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lix

Hours before resuscitation Alive Dead Total Mortality

rate

X2 P-value

<1hour

>1hour

Total

47(23.5)

1(0.5)

48(24)

151(75.5)

1(0.5)

152(76)

198(99)

2(1)

200(100)

75.5

24.5

0.749 0.382

iii. Relevant investigations

One hundred and sixty five (82.5%) patients had some or all the relevant investigations needed to confirm the cause of coma. Forty eight

(24%) in this group survived while one hundred and eleven (55.5%) died, giving a mortality rate of 67.3%. On the other hand, all the thirty five

(17.5%) patients who had no investigations died, giving a mortality rate of 100% in fig. 18 below. This result was statistically significant

(X2=14.04, P = 0.000). However, there was a weak correlation between outcome and investigation (Pearson’s R = 0.232, Spearman Correlation

= 0.232).

Page 60: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lx

iv. Family support/knowledge of cause of coma.

Family support had a strong influence on outcome. (X2=27.07, P=0.000). The mortality rate of 56.8% in patients who had excellent (80-

100%) family support was lower than 86.1% and 97.1% respectively for those who had good (50-79%) and poor (<50%) family support.

Family knowledge of cause of coma also had some influence on coma outcome, as it was statistically significant (X2=7.84, P=0.02).

Mortality was highest (84.1%) in patients whose family members had the least knowledge (80.3%) and lowest (64.8%) in those whose family

members had excellent knowledge. However, spearman correlation for family knowledge was weaker (0.164) than that for family support (0.356).

See table 17 below for more details.

Table 17 Influence of the family support/ knowledge of cause of coma on outcome

Family support

Alive (%)

Dead(%)

Total

(%)

Mortality

rate

X2

P-

value

Fig 18: Distribution of outcome according to ability to do relevant investigations

32.7

0

67.3

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

All/some None Relevant investigation P>0.05

Percentage

Alive Dead

Page 61: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxi

Excellent(80-100%)

Very good/good(50-79%)

Poor/ very poor(<50%)

Total

36(18)

11(5.5)

1(0.5)

48(24)

51(25.5)

68(34)

33(16.5)

152(76)

87(43.5)

79(39.5)

34(17)

200(100)

56.8

86.1

97.1

27.07

0.000

Family knowledge of cause

of coma

Alive

Dead

Total

Mortality

rate

X2

P-

value

Excellent(80-100%)

Very good/good(50-79%)

Poor/ very poor(<50%)

Total

25(12.5)

13(6.5)

10(5)

48(24)

46(23)

53(26.5)

53(26.5)

152(76) 200(100)

71(35.5)

66(33)

63(31.5)

64.8

80.3

84.1

7.84

0.020

v. UCH social welfare support

17% of patients who were offered <50% social welfare support had the highest mortality rate of 82.4%, while those with 50-79% had the

least mortality rate of 61%. However, the mortality rate of 7.5% was observed in the very few (2%) who had excellent support and the majority

(71.5%) who for various reasons had none. Thus the influence of UCH social welfare support on outcome of coma was statistically insignificant

(x2=0.591, p=0.74) as shown in table 18 below.

Table 18. Influence of UCH social welfare support on outcome of coma

UCH social welfare

support

Alive(%) Dead(%) Total(%) Mortality

rate

X2 P-

value

Excellent(80-100%)

Very good/good(50-79%)

Poor/ very poor(<50%)

Not sought for

Total

1(0.5)

5(2.5)

6(3)

36(18)

48(24)

3(1.5)

14(7)

28(14)

107(53.5)

152(76)

4(2)

23(11.5)

34(17)

143(71.5)

200(100)

75

61

82.4

74.8

0.591

0.744

Page 62: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxii

4.7 PREDICTION OF THE OUTCOME OF MEDICAL COMA USING THE GLASGOW COMA SCALE (GCS) AND

BRAINSTEM SIGNS SCORE (BSS)

The positive predictive value (PPV) is the % correct prediction of deaths and is > 50% when more deaths than recovery are recorded,

especially if those deaths occurred at scores equal or lower than the critical score, and vice versa.

The negative predictive value (NPV) is the % correct prediction of survival and is >50% when more survivors than deaths are recorded especially

at scores higher than the critical score, and vice versa. For the calculation of PPV and NPV, see appendix 1.

4.7.1 The predictive value of the Glasgow Coma Scale (see table 19)

The PPV was < 50% for all the coma groups on the day of admission (DI). It improved to 53.5% and 55.6% for cerebrovascular and

metabolic coma respectively, but remained <50% for the rest on the third day of admission (D3). On the seventh day (D7), it remained <50%

except for cerebrovascular, (52.4%) and hypoxic-ischemic (50%) coma. On the fourteenth day, (D14), it remained <50% for all except infectious

coma where it was 66.7%. On the twenty-eight day (D28), it was zero for all the coma groups.

The NPV on D1 ranged from 63.6% for cerebrovascular coma to 100% for hypoxic-ischemic coma. On D3, the range was 72.7% for

cerebrosvacular; 83.3% for the “other” causes and 100% for the rest. On D7 through D28, the NPV was 100% for all the coma groups.

Page 63: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxiii

4.7.2 The predictive value of the brainstem sign score (see table 20)

The PPV on D1 was 100% for all the coma groups. On D3 it was 100% for all the groups except metabolic coma where it was 97.1%. On

D7, it was 92% for metabolic and cerebrovascular each and 100% for the rest. On D14, it was zero for infectious and hypoxic-ischemic, 87.5% for

cerebrovascular and 100% for the rest. On D28, it was zero for all, except cerebrovascular where it was 100%.

The NPV was zero for all the coma groups on DI. On D3, it was <30% for the groups except metabolic with 68.2%. On D7, it remained up to 88%

Page 64: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxiv

for metabolic, 100% for other causes; and < 50% for the rest. On D14, it was 100% for both metabolic and hypoxic-schemic coma, and < 50% for

the rest. On D28, it was zero to 50% for all except metabolic (75%) and hypoxic-ischemic (100%).

Page 65: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxv

4.8 MULTIPLE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE MOST SIGNIFICANT PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES

An SPSS logistic regression output of the analysis of significant prognostic factors in medical coma as follows (see table 21).

1) On day 1, presentation to UCH after <6hrs of coma was the most significant factor (Sig of 0.727, S.E. of 0.132, 95% CI of 0.81-1.36),

followed by family knowledge of cause of coma (Sig of 0.575, S.E. of 0.263, 95% CI of 0.52-1.45), GCS (Sig of 0.355, S.E of 0.185, 95%

CI of 0.83-1.71) and family support (Sig of 0.322, S.E of 0.377, 95% CI of 0.69-3.04).

2) On day 3, cause of coma was most significant (Sig of 0.830; SE of 0.068, 95%, CI of 0.89-1.16), followed by family knowledge of cause

of coma (Sig of 0.759, SE of 0.359, 95% CI of 0.44-1.81), family support (Sig of 0.597, SE of 0.55, 95% CI of 0.46-3.9) and ability to do

the relevant investigations (Sig of 0.314, SE of 0.023, 95% CI of 0.98-1.07)

3) On day 7, ability to do the relevant investigations was most significant (Sig of 0.94; SE of 1.1, 95% CI of 0.11-7.51), followed by

Page 66: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxvi

knowledge of cause of coma (Sig of 0.681, SE of 0.0.57, 95% CI of 0.26-2.4), age of patients (Sig of 0.615, SE of 0.033, 95% CI of 0.95-

1.1), cause of coma (Sig of 0.567, SE of 0.097, 95% CI of 0.78-1.15) family . support (Sig of 0.355, SE of 0.18, 95% CI of 0.59-1.21).

4) On day 14 all the factors had similar significant value of 1.0

CHAPTER FIVE

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1 DISCUSSION

5.1.1 Epidemiology of medical coma in University College Hospital Ibadan

i. General incidence: In general, medical coma constituted 9.8% of emergency admissions and 3.1% of total hospital admissions in UCH

Ibadan during the study period.

The most common coma group in this study was metabolic coma with an incidence of 35.5%. This contrasts with many report which

placed cerebral infections above metabolic coma as the commonest cause of medical coma in developing countries in general and Africa in

particular.42,43,45-48 However, the incidence of 22% which placed cerebral infections third after stroke with 33% in this study may indicate a

decreasing frequency of the devastating effect of infections, probably due to availability of powerful antibiotics in Africa.45 As a group,

cerebrovascular diseases or stroke were second to metabolic coma in this study, but hemorrhagic stroke as an entity constituted about 26% of all

cases, thereby becoming the single most common cause of medical coma during the period of the study. This result agrees with earlier ones on

stroke29,53,99,100,102 and coma. However, it accounted for 79% of all strokes in this study, a figure which is higher than the 65% reported by Ogun in

Lagos29. Many reasons could account for this difference. One reasons could be because Ogun’s study was a retrospective one with its attendant

limitations. Another reason could be that UCH being a centre for WHO stroke research centre and with CT scan and other laboratory facilities for

stroke diagnosis and management attracted many cases of stroke.

Hypoxic-ischemic coma accounted for only 5% of cases in this study, with cardiac arrest being responsible in half of the cases. This result

confirms that this group is still not a significant cause of coma in this part of the world yet, unlike in developed countries,49,50,88. Other causes such

Page 67: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxvii

as status epilepticus, shock, hypertensive encephalopathy and CNS lymphoma were very few in number. All the CNS lymphoma cases were HIV

seropositive as part of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) complex82,103.

The increased incidence of diabetic coma (12.5%) in this study, second only to hemorrhagic stroke shows that diabetes as a disease entity,

is becoming an important prevalent disease in Nigeria,59 which should not be ignored but must be recognized as a major source of morbidity and

mortality51.

Uremic coma came third after diabetes as cause of medical coma. Many of the cases came in end-stage renal failure possibly as a result of a

combination of ignorance, poverty, herbal drugs ingestion, unavailability or unaffordability of drugs or poor drug compliance. Most cases were

due to hypertensive nephrosclerosis and diabetic nephropathy, while some were associated with HIV and hepatitis B viral infections. Few cases

presented in pre-renal acute renal failure. Uremic coma has not been reported as a major cause of nontraumatic coma. In the developed world, it

could be the result of good patient care in the pre-end-stage renal failure stage so that few go into uremic coma. In the developing countries, lack

of or inadequate renal dialysis units coupled with high cost of drugs and dialysis might preclude many patients from presenting to hospitals earlier.

Hepatic coma accounted for 6% of causes in this study and its occurrence has been attributed to the high prevalence of chronic liver

diseases and hepatitis B viral infection in the environment98. The causes of hypoglycemia in this study were in consonance with the report by other

workers especially in African65,66

Meningitides, sepsis syndrome and parameningitides/brain abscesses and cerebral malaria were the infections identified in this study. The

first three groups of infections were seen mainly in HIV seropositive patients especially TB and viral meningitides. This agrees with many studies

linking the high incidence of TB meningitis with the resurgence of the HIV pandemic,104,105. The pyogenic meningitides were due to

Streptococcus pneumoniae and no case of meningococcal meningitis was seen. This is not surprising because Ibadan is located in the forest zone

and not the hot dry savannah meningitic belt of Nigeria and Streptococcal pneumoniae still remains the commonest cause of sporadic cause of

bacteria meningitis23

ii. Sex and age incidence: There was a 2:1 male to female ratio in this study, which agrees with most studies in nontraumatic coma all over

the world50,53. The reasons adduced for this include the possible presence of more risk factors for the various causes of coma25,51,52 or the tendency

for more males to attend hospitals53,59,63,75. The age group 40-59 was the most commonly affected but this was evident only in coma due to

Page 68: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxviii

infections. In metabolic and cerebrovascular causes, the >60 age group was the dominant group, followed by the 40-59 group. This is similar to

many earlier results in the developed world41,49,50 but different from those of Africa where the mean age was usually lower42,43,48,103 This trend

may represent a gradual prominence of diseases of the developed world in Africa.

iii. Socioeconomic grouping: The self employed (made up of traders, artisans and commercial taxi drivers, farmers etc) and the unemployed

constituted more than 70% of the study population while the government employed were in minority. This is the trend in many earlier studies53,76

too. Many reasons can be adduced for this disparity, which may include the possible occurrence of more risk factors for the various causes of

coma. The self employed are people with possible low educational attainment,53,65 poor financial background29,47 high ignorance level65, and

therefore more prone to high risk lifestyle43,75. On the other hand, the public servant with a steady income and possibly higher literacy level and

awareness was able to control or avoid risk factors for stroke, diabetes mellitus and other causes of coma. However, it must be pointed out that no

high level public servant, prominent politician, traditional ruler, doctors and other professionals was seen through out the period of this study. The

reasons for this are not known to the author, but may be a subject for another research.

5.1.2 Outcome of medical coma

i. General consideration

Medical coma accounted for about 16.8% of all UCH patient deaths during the study period. This figure is higher than the annual death

rate of between 300, 400 per 4568 cases recorded in UCH more than 2 decades ago103.

The best one month outcome of coma in this study in terms of the 5 functional levels described in the literature50 showed that 76% of the

patients died, 2% went into vegetative state, 6% recovered with severe disability, 5% recovered with mild disability and 11% had good recovery.

This report compares well with those published by Bates D et al40 and Bates D and Caronna JJ et al50 in which they reported 61% deaths, 12%

vegetative state, 12% severe disability and 15% mild to good recovery respectively in their patients.

The medical coma group with the worst outcome was infections with 86.6% mortality rate. This must be related to the underlying

retroviral infection associated with many of them as reported in many earlier series,96,104,105 otherwise infections were reported to have the best

outcome in the absence of retroviral infection.40,43,50 Hypoxic-ischemic coma had a good outcome of 40% followed by metabolic coma with

32.4%. This agrees with earlier predictions by Levy DE, et al40 and Bates D et al50. The fair outcome of metabolic coma was mainly due to

Page 69: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxix

hypoglycemia and diabetic coma, because the other component i.e. hepatic coma and uremic coma had 100% and 83.3% mortality rate

respectively. The survival rate of diabetic ketoacidotic coma was 100% in this study while that of hyperosmolar nonketotic coma was 29%. This

was a great improvement from the 100% case fatality in hyperosmolar nonketotic coma reported in UCH Ibadan by Osuntokun et al many years

ago63. Many factors may account for this including availability of glucometers and human insulin106.

ii. Co-morbidity/complications

One hundred and eighty four (92%) of the patients had one or more co-morbid illness(es), common among which were aspiration

pneumonia, hypertension, recurrent seizures, sepsis, anemia, liver cirrhosis, acute renal failure, hyperglycemia, acute renal failure. None of these

illnesses was associated with a mortality rate of less than 50%. Liver cirrhosis had the highest rate of 95%, followed by acute pulmonary edema

with 93.8%. These findings are also in conformity with some of those described by other workers84,98.

It is important to note the absence of decubitus ulcers, deep venous thrombosis, malnutrition and contractures as major co-morbid illness

complicating coma in this study.

This may reflect either good medical and nursing care or that the patients died soon after admission and did not live long enough to develop those

complications.

iii. Predisposing factors

Hypertension was the commonest predisposing factor identified in this study. It was present in 33.5% and 5.5% of coma due to stroke and

metabolic coma, (mainly diabetic and uremic) respectively. In stroke, it occurred in association with obesity in 6%, alcohol and substance abuse in

5.5%, diabetes mellitus in 4.5% and old age in 4% of cases respectively. It was also associated with the probability of 83% mortality. These

observations are in agreement with those of many workers in Nigeria51,53,59,102 and other countries61, 100

Diabetes Mellitus was present in 14% of the patients. It was a strong factor in diabetic nephrosclerosis (8%) and in stroke especially in

association with alcohol abuse and obesity with attendant poor prognosis63,106. It was a predisposing factor in one of the 2 cases of status

epilepticus in the study.

Underlying HIV infection was a strong factor in the prognosis of the meningitides, parameningitis, sepsis syndrome, and CNS lymphoma.

The almost 95% mortality associated with its presence in this study has been reported by other workers,52,104,105. HBsAg was associated with all

Page 70: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxx

the hepatic coma and some of the uremic coma cases with a overall mortality rate of 83%, but a specific rate of 100% in hepatic coma. These

figures agree with those obtained in studies on hepatic coma in Ibadan107 and uremic coma in Ethiopia108respectively many years ago.

iv. Sociological factors

The result obtained in this study showed that patients who had above 50% family support and were able to pay for some relevant

investigations had a better outcome than those who had poor or less than 50% family support or failed to pay for investigations. This report is in

consonance with those of Hammed MB and Goldman L et al55 and Jorgensen HS et al54.

Delayed presentation to hospital was a major factor in this study. About 45% of the patients were brought to hospital more than 6hours after onset

of coma and this group had higher mortality. Many of these patients were referred from private hospitals where they were first seen and most of

the times presented to UCH with co-morbid illnesses, hence the higher mortality. This also agrees with the observations of other workers,

particularly with respect to stroke29,53 and hypoglycemia64,65 especially in Africa.

v. Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

The GCS as an index of assessing levels of consciousness in this study was very useful as it ensured uniformity93 and standardization of

patient monitoring43. But it had a poor positive predictive value and a higher negative predictive value. This may suggest that it has a higher ability

to accurately predict survival than death. This feature of GCS was uniform in all the groups of medical coma but was best in hypoxic-ischemic

coma. This observation agrees with those of other researchers of traumatic and nontraumatic coma41,87. Many of these researchers have

circumvented the limitations of the GCS by applying the components separately and not summing up the scores40,41,50 but this also has its pitfall

10. However, others have modified them for use in conjunction with brainstem responses38,91. The GCS was more useful for monitoring or

detecting clinical improvement and not very useful for predicting outcome from initial evaluation of comatose patients.

vi. Prognostic value of brainstem signs

Brainstem signs score had both high positive predictive value and good negative predictive value. Therefore it seems to be able to predict

both survival and death at initial evaluation of coma patient. This feature was recognized by many workers who had used it in various ways to

predict outcome of coma,38,40-41. In this study, most of the patients with abnormal brainstem functions below the critical score died and vice versa,

irrespective of cause of coma, which is in consonance with several earlier reports40,49.

Page 71: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxi

vii. Coma as an independent poor prognostic factor

The high mortality of 76% recorded in this study irrespective of early diagnosis, resuscitative measures and treatment, presence or absence

of risk factors or co-morbid illnesses, excellent or poor family support confirm that coma, irrespective of cause has an independent prognostic

value. This observation has been supported by reports of many other workers86,88.

5.2 CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions can be made from the results of this study.

1. Medical coma constituted 9.8% of emergency admissions, 3.1% of total hospital admissions and 16.8% of hospital deaths in UCH, Ibadan

during the study period.

2. The four most common causes of medical coma in UCH Ibadan were hemorrhagic stroke, diabetic coma, uremic coma and meningitides.

3. The four strongest predisposing factors identified were hypertension, diabetes mellitus, H.I.V/Hepatitis B viral infection and obesity

4. The four commonest co-morbid illnesses were aspiration pneumonia, hypertension, recurrent seizures and sepsis.

5. The Glasgow Coma Scale when used in conjunction with the brainstem signs score were useful both for initial evaluation and continuous

monitoring of medical coma patients for the purpose of predicting outcome.

5.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

(i) Inadequate funds for investigations and ICU management. 35 of the 200 patients could not be investigated because of lack of fund. Some

could not afford the cost of I.C.U admission and computerized tomography scan of the head/brain.

(ii) Lack of laboratory facilities for identification of specific viral agents causing meningitis and encephalitis.

Page 72: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxii

(iii) Lack of CSF diagnostic tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (polymerase chain reaction, tuberculostearic acid, detection of antibodies or

immune complexes)

(iv) Serum drug and alcohol levels monitoring was not possible due to lack of facilities.

(v) Inadequate facilities in the I.C.U including limited bed spaces.

(vi) Lack of post mortem for confirmation of causes of death. Only 5 autopsies were done to confirm cause of death in this study. Dislike for

post mortem was very strong among the population for cultural and religious reasons.

REFERENCES

1. Adams RD, Victor M (eds): Coma and related disorders of consciousness. In: Principles of Neurology, 3rd ed, 1985, pg 255-62,

International ed, McGraw-Hill Book. Co.

2. Ropper AH: Acute confessional states and coma. In: Harrision’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 15th ed. Braunwald E; Fauci,

A.S; Isselbacher KJ; Wilson JD et al, (eds) Vol I, Chp24, pg 132-140,2001.

3. Wilson BA. In: Brain damage, Brain repair; 1st ed. Fawcett JW, Rosser AE, Dunnett SB, 2001, pp217-222, Oxford Univ. Press.

4. Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: A practical scale. Lancet, 1975:1:480-4.

5. Harris J, Berger J: Clinical approach to stupor and coma. In: Neurology in Clinical Practice, vol I, Butterworth Heinemann,

Page 73: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxiii

Bostom, pg 43-63, 1991.

6. Ivan L, Bruce D: Coma. Springfied. IL, Charles C. Thormas (ed), 1982.

7. The Multi Society Task Force on Persistent Vegetative State (PVS): Medical aspects of the PVS – first of two parts. IV. Engl J.

Med 1994; 330: 1499 – 1508.

8. Lee M.S, Marsden CD: Neurological sequelae following carbon monoxide poisoning: clinical course and outcome according to

the clinical types and brain computed tomography scan findings.

9. DU Plessis AJ, Johnston MV; Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in the newborn: cellular mechanism and potential strategies for

neuroprotection.

10. Teasdale G, Jennett B, Murray L, Murray G: Glasgow Coma Scale: To sum or not to sum. Lancet 1983:2:678.

11. Ropper A.H: Lateral displacement of the brain and level of consciousness in patients with acute hemispheric mass. N Engl. J

Med 1986:314 (15): 953-8.

12. Ropper AH: Coma and acutely raised intracranial pressure: In: Diseases of the Nervous System. 2nd ed. A. Asbury et al (eds)

Philadelphia Saunder, 1992.

13. Fisher CM; The neurological examination of the comatose patient Acta. Neuro. Scandinavian 1969. 45(suppl 36):1-56.

14. Young PA, Young P.H (eds): Brainstem motor centers: In Basic clinical Neuroanatomy, 1997, Willims and Wilkins, pp 73-81.

15. Leigh RJ, Zee DS: The neurology of eye movements, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, FA Davis, 1991, pp 194.

16. Young P.A, Young P.H (eds): The Ocular motor system (vestibulo-ocular reflex and conjugate gaze): In Basic clinical Neuro-

anatomy, 1997 Williams and Wilkins. Pp 117-126.

17. Young BY, Piggot SE: Neurobiological basis of consciousness. Arch, Neuro.56:153, 1999.

18. Plum F: Disturbances of consciousness and arousal: In: Cecil Textbook of Medicine, 19th ed. WB Saunder Co. Philadelphia,

1992, pg 2048-2063.

19. Young BY : Coma and impaired consciousness. N.Y., McGrow-Hill, 1997.

Page 74: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxiv

20. Olubuyide I.O, Atoba MA, Ayoola EA: Factors in the aetiology of hepatic encephalopathy in the tropics. West Africa Med. J

1990:9(1):50-53.

21. Ennis ED, Stahl EB, Kreisberg RA: The hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome. Diabetes Reviews 1994:2(1):115-125.

22. Thyrault M, Septic shock in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Intensive care Medicine. 23(10): 1018-

23,1997 Oct.

23. Karen LR, Kenneth LT: Bacterial meningitis and other suppurative infections. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine,

Vol II, 15th ed, 2001, Chap. 372, pg 2462-2470.

24. Kenneth LT: Viral meningitis and encephalitis. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, Vol II, 15th ed; 2001, Chap. 373,

pg 2471-2480.

25. Lodder M.C, Schildkamp RL: Prognostic indicators of the outcome of meningococcal disease: A study of 562 patients. J Med

Microbid 45(1): 16-20, 1996 Jul.

26. Frank JL : Large hemispheric infarction, deterioration and intracranial pressure. Neurol. 1995;45(7):1286-90.

27. Hacke W, Schwab S: Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction; clinical course and prognostic signs, Archives or Neurology.

53(4):309-15, April 1996.

28. O’sullivan MG, Sellar R: Management of poor grade patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage: importance of neuro-radiological

findings on clinical outcome. Brit. J Neurosurgery 10(5):445-52, 1996 Cot.

29. Ogun S.A: Acute stroke mortality at Lagos University Teaching Hospital- A five year review. Nig, Qt .J Hosp, Med; 2000 Jan-

Mar, vol 10(1).

30. Bell JA, Hodgson HJF: Coma after cardiac arrest. Brain, 1974, 97:361-372.

31. Loweinstein DH, Aminoff MJ: Clinical and EEG features of status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology, 1992;42, pg

100-104.

32. Caronna JJ, Simon RP: The comatose patient: A diagnostic approach and treatment. Int. Anaesthesia clin 17(2/3):3, 1979.

Page 75: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxv

33. Malik K, Hess C: Evaluating the comatose patient: rapid neurologic assessment is key to appropriate management Postgraduate

Medicine, 2002;111(2),38-55

34. Towne AR, Waterhouse FJ: Prevalence of non-convulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology 2000, 54(2):340-

5.

35. Pellock JM: Use of midazolam for refractory status epilepticus in pediatric patients. Journal of Child Neurology 13(12):581-

7,1998 Dec.

36. Plum F, Swanson AG; Barbiturate poisoning treated by physiological methods JAMA 163:827-835, 1957.

37. Martens F, Ibe K,: Clinical experience with the benzodiazepine antagonist: Flumazenil in suspected benzodiazepine poisoning.

Clin toxicology 1990, 28(3):341-356.

38. Teasdale G. and Jennett B: Assessment of impaired consciousness and coma: a practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81-84, 1974.

39. Plum F, Posner JB: The diagnosis of stupor and coma, 3rd ed, Philadelphia. A Davis Co, 1980.

40. Levy DE; Dates D; Caroma JJ; Cartilidge NEF; Knill-Jones RP; Lapinski RH; Singer BH; Shaw DA; Plum F: Prognosis in

nontraumatic coma, Ann. Intern Med; 1981:94:293-301.

41. Levy DE, Caronna JJ, Singer BH; Lapinski RH; Frydman H; Plum F: Predicting outcome from hypoxic-ischemic coma. JAMA,

1985:253(10):1420-26.

42. Rwiza HT, McLarty DG: Assessment of prognosis in non-traumatic coma in a tropical environment. Trop. Doctor 1987:17:52-

56.

43. Sinclair GR, Watter DA, Bagshaw A: Non-traumatic coma in Zambia. Trop. Doctor.1989:19(1):6-10.

44. Synder BD, Ramirez-lassepas M, Lippert DM, : Neurologic status and prognosis after cardiopulmonary arrest: I.A retrospective

study. Neur. 1977, 807-11.

45. Osuntokun BO, Ogunniyi A.O: Infections of the nervous system. In: Epidemiology of neurological illness in Africa, 1993 pg 6-

9.

Page 76: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxvi

46. Bagshawe A: Non-traumatic coma. Postgradaute Doctor 1990 (12): 58-64.

47. Bondi FS: Childhood coma in Ibadan. Relationship to socio-economic factors. Trop. Geog med. 1991 Jul; 43 (3): 288-92.

48. Melka A, Tekic-Haimanot R, Assefa M: Aetiology and outcome of non-traumatic altered state of consciousness in North-

Western Ethiopia. E. African Med J. 74(1):49-53, 1997 Jan.

49. Snyder BD, Gumnit RJ, Leppik IE, Hauser WA, Loewenson RB, Ramirez, Lassepas M : Neurologic prognosis after

cardiopulmonary arrest: IV: Brainstem reflexes. Neurol, 1981,31:1092-1097.

50. Bates D, Caronna JJ, Cartlidge NEF, Knill-Jones RP, Levy DE, Shaw D.A, and Plum F: A prospective study of non-traumatic

coma: methods and results in 310 patients. Annals of Neurology, 1997:2:211-20.

51. Kolawole B.A, Ajayi A.A: Prognostic indices for intra-hospital mortality in Nigerian diabetic NIDDM patients. Role of gender

and hypertension.

52. Liano F, Pasual J: Outcomes in acute renal failure. Seminars in nephrology: 18(5):154-50, 1998 Sept.

53. Dada T.C Johnson FA, Araba AB: Cerebrovascular accidents in Nigerians – A review of 205 cases. West Afric Med. J,

1969:18:95-108.

54. Jorgensen H.S, Reith J, Nakayama H, Raaschou H.O, Olsen T.S: what determines good recovery in patients with the most

severe stroke? The Copenhagen stroke study. Stroke 30 (10): 2008-12, 1999 Oct.

55. Hammed MB, Goldman L, Teno J, Lynn J, Davis RB, Harrell FE, Connors AF, Califf R, Kussin P, Bellamy P, Vidaillet H,

Phillips RS: Identifications of comatose patients at high risk for death or severe disability. JAMA, June 21, 1995-Vol 273, No

23. 1842-8.

56. Kaplan P.W: Assessment of outcomes in patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus. J Clinical Neurophysiology. 16 (4):

341-51. Jul 1999.

57. Cook TM, Protherre RT, Handel JM: Tetanus : a review of the literature. Br J. Anaesth, 2001: 87: 477-87.

58. Chen R, Bolten CF, Young B: Prediction of outcome in patients with anoxic coma; a clinical and electrophysiologic study..

Page 77: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxvii

critical care medicine 24(4): 672-8, 1996 April.

59. Genuth SM: Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar coma. Curr Ther Endocrinol Metab 1997; 6:438-447.

60. Ritz E, Koch M, Fliser D; Schwenger V: How can we improve prognosis in diabetes patients with end-stage renal disease.

Diabetes care 22 suppl 2: B80-3, 1999 Mar.

61. O’ Keefe JH Jr; Miles JM, Harris WH; Moe RM, McCallister BD: Improving the adverse cardiovascular prognosis of type 2

DM. Mayo Clinic proceedings 74(2): 171-80, 1999 April.

62. Pallangyo KJ, Yusufali AM, McLarty D,G, Salim S.S: Treatment of diabetic coma in a tropical environment. Tropical Doctor

1984 (14): 72-75.

63. Osuntokun BO, Akinkugbe FM, Francis T.I; Reddy S; Osuntokun O, Taylor G.O.L: Diabetes mellitus in Nigerians: A study of

832 patients. The West Afr. Med J. 1971, 295 – 311.

64. Sasaki A, Uehara M, Horiuchi , Hasegawa K, Shimizu T: A 15year follow-up study of patients with NIDDM in Osaka, Japan.

Factors predictive of the prognosis of diabetic patients. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 36(1): 41-7, 1991 April.

65. White NJ, Warrell DA, Chantharanich P, Looareesuwan S, Warrell MJ, Krishna S, Williamson DN, Turner RC: Severe

hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in falciparum malaria. The N. Engl J Med 1983: 309(2); 61-66.

66. Lester PT: Severe hypoglycemic reactions in Ethiopian diabetics. Ethiopian Med J:20: 33, 1982.

67. Hart SP, Frier BM: Causes, management and morbidity of acute hypoglycemia in adults requiring hospital admission. QJM

91(7): 505-10, 1998 Jul.

68. Carter WP: Hypothermia: a sign of hypoglycemia. J. Am. Coll. Emergency Room Physicians 5:594, 1979.

69. McCandless DW, Abel MS: Hypoglycemia and cerebral energy metabolism Pg 27. In McCandless DW (ed): Cerebral Energy

Metabolism and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Plenum. NY, 1985.

70. Himwish EW, Frostig JP, Fazekas JF, Hadidian Z: The mechanism of the symptoms of insulin induced hypoglycemia. Am J

Psychiatry 96: 37, 1939.

Page 78: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxviii

71. Malouf R, Brust JCM: Hypoglycemia, causes, neurological manifestations, and outcome. Ann Neurol, 17: 421, 1985.

72. Oslen S: The brain in uremia. Acta Psychiatr. Neurol Scand Suppl 156:1, 1961.

73. Raskin N.H. Uremic encephalopathy. In Merritt’s Neurology, 10th ed by Lewis PR, 2000, pp 886-888. Lippincatt Williams and

Wilkins.

74. Jones EA, Weissenborn K: Neurology and the liver. J. Neurol. Neurosurgery Psychiatry 1997: 63: 279-293.

75. Greenwood BM, Bradley K, Cleland PG; Haggie MHK, Hassan-King M, Lewis L.S, Macfarlane JT, Taqi A, Whittle HC,

Bradley-Moore A.M: An epidemic of meningococcal infection in Zaria; Northern Nigeria: I. General epidemiological features.

Tran. Roy. Soc. Med. Hyg 1979: 73: (5): 557-563.

76. Akpede GO, Akutiwa RT, Ogiji EO, Ambe JP: Risk factors for an adverse outcome in bacterial meningitis in the tropics: a

reappraisal with focus on the significance and risk of seizures. Ann. Trop. Pased. 1999 Jun; 19(2):151-9).

77. Leonard JM; Des Prez RM: Tuberculosis of the central nervous. system. In Neurology and General Medicine; (ed). Aminoff

M.A Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 587-598.

78. Ajayi-Obe EK, Lodi E, Alkali A.S, Galbati M, Rooney C, Mannoni B, Grim P, Nasidi A, Mohammed I: Prognostic scores for

use in Africa meningococcal epidemics Bull. World Health Organ. 1998; 76(2): 149-52.

79. Misra UK; Kalita J; Srivastava M; Mandal SK: Prognosis of tuberculous meningitis – a multivariate analysis. J. Neurolog. Sc.

137 (1) 57-61, 1996 April.

80. Warrel DA: Cerebral malaria. Quart. J Med 1989: 71: 369-371.

81. Okubadejo NU, Danesi MA: Diagnostic issues in cerebral malaria: a study of 112 adolescents and adults in Lagos. Niger

Postgrad. Med J, 2004 Mar, 11 (1); 10-14.

82. Gerald MP, Eden OB, Lilleyman JS: Acute encephalopathy during induction therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr

Hematol Oncol. 3:49, 1986.

83. Healton EB, Burst JCM, Feinfeld DA: Hypertensive encephalopathy and the neurologic manifestations of malignant

Page 79: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxix

hypertension. Neurology 1982: 32:127-132.

84. Posner JB: The comatose patient. JAMA 232:1313, 1975

85. Murphy DJ, Cliff LE (eds) SUPPORT: Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

J. Clin epidemiol. 1990; 43 (supp): 15-1235.

86. Moulton C, Pennycock A; Relation between Glasgow Coma Scale and cough reflex. Lancet. 1994:343:1261-62

87. Teasdale G, Murray G, Parker L, Jennet B: Adding up the Glasgow Coma Score. Acta Neurochir, 1979, 28 (Suppl): 13-16.

88. Edgren E, Hedstrand U, Kelsey S, Sutton – Tyrell K, Safar P, and BRCT. I study group: Assessment of neurological prognosis

in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Lancet 1994: 343: 1055 – 59.

89. Burst JCM. Coma. In: Merritt’s Neurology, 10th ed by Lewis PR, 2000, pg 17-23. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

90. Cullen DJ; Ferrara LC; Briggs BA; Walker PF; Gilbert J: Survival, hospital charges and follow-up results in critically ill

patients. N. Engl J Med. 294:982-987, 1976

91. Benzer A; Mitterschiffthaler G; Marosi M, Luef G; Fuhringer F; Dela Renotiere K; Lehner H; Schmutzhard E: Prediction on

non survival after trauma. Innsbruck coma scale. Lancet 1991: 338: 977-78.

92. Watters DAA, Wilson IH, Sinclaar JR, Ngandu N: A Clinical Sickness Score for the critically ill in Central Africa. Intensive

Care Med. 1989: 15(17): 467-70.

93. Teasdale G, Knill – Jones R and Van Der Sande J: Observer variability in assessing impaired, consciousness and coma. J.

Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1978, 41, 603-610.

94. Plum F, Levy D: Predicting prognosis in coma, can one improve medical decision? Am J.Med.1978:65:224-6.

95. Manning B: Legal and policy issues in the allocation of death, the dying patient. Edited by Brim OG, freeman HE, Levine S, et

al, New York, Russell sage, 1970, pp 253-274.

96. Lynn J, Harrel F Jnr: Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care

public policy. New Horizons 5(1): 56-61, 1997 Feb.

Page 80: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxx

97. Fletcher GP: Legal aspects of the decision not to prolong life. Moral problems in medicine. Edited by Gorovitzs, Jameton A,

Macklin R et al. Eaglewood Cliffs. NJ Prentice Hall, 1976, pg 261-266.

98. Otegbayo J.A: Complications contributing to mortality in acute hepatitis at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Niger. J. Med, 2001 Jul – Sept; 10 (3): 127-9.

99. Gonzalez-Duarte A, Cantu C; Ruiz-Sandoval J.L, Barinagarrementeria F: Reccurrent primary cerebral hemorrhage (RPCH):

frequency, mechanisms and prognosis. Stroke 29(9); 1802-5, 1998 Sept.

100. Sacco R.L, Wolf P.A Gorelick P.B: Risk factors and their management for stroke prevention: outlook for 1999 and beyond.

Neurol. 1999, 53 (7 suppl 4): S 15-24.

101. Araoye M.O (ed): Research Methodology with statistics for Health and Social Sciences. Nathadex Publishers ILORIN, 2004;

115-129.

102. Osuntokun B.O; Odeku E.L, Adeloye RBA: Cerebrovascular accidents In Nigerians: A study of 348 patients. The West African

Med. J. 1969: 18:160 – 173.

103. SO YT, Choucair A, Davis RL: Neoplasms of the central nervous system in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. P 285. In

Rosenblum ML, Levy RM, Bredesen DE (eds): AIDS and the Nervous system. Raven Press, N.Y, 1988.

104. Idoko JA, Anteyi EA, Idoko LO,: HIV and associated TB in JOS, Nigeria. Nig. Med. Practitioner 1994: 28 48-50.

105. Bergemann A, Karstaedt A.S: The spectrum of meningitis in a population with high prevalence of HIV disease. Quart. J Med

1996: 89:499-504.

106. Makrilakis K, Bakris G; Diabetic hypertensive patients: improving their prognosis. J. of cardiovascular pharmacology 31 Suppl

2:534-40 1998.

107. Adetuyibi A; Akisanya JB, Onadeko BO: Analysis of the causes of death on the medical wards of the UCH, Ibadan over a 14-

year period (1960-1973). Trans, Roy Soc. Trop. Med and Hygiene, 70:5/6 1976, 466-473.

108. Habte B, Teklu B: Chronic renal failure in Ethiopians.

Page 81: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxi

Ethiopian Med J. 1980: 37-43.

APPENDIX I

The Predictive value of GCS and Brainstem sign scores (BSS) in medical coma

(Calculated using the 2 by 2 contigency table).

GCS Brainstem sign score Dead Alive

3 < 13 True positive

(a)

False negative (c )

> 3 > 13 False positive

(b)

True negative (d)

Positive predictive value (PPV) = a x 100%

(% correct prediction of death) a + b

Negative predictive (NPV) = d x 100%

(% correct prediction of survival) d + c

APPENDIX II

BRAINSTEM FUNCTIONS AS PROGNOSTIC INDICES

Brainstem sign Location of lesion / dysfunction

i

Pupillary size / light responses

Symmetrically round, reactive (2.5–5.0mm

diameter) pupils

Symmetrically dilated, unreactive (>5.0mm

diameter) pupils

Unilaterally dilated, unreactive pupil

Normal size pupils; excludes midbrain

damage.

Severe midbrain damage, usually from

transtentorial herniation

Compression / stretching of third cranial

nerve by ipsilateral midbrain mass or

contralaterally against the opposite

tentorial margin

Page 82: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxii

ii

iii

iv

Symmetrically small, reactive

(1.0-2.5mm diameter) pupils

Symmetrically pinpoint reactive

(< 1.0mm diameter) pupils

Unilaterally small, unreactive

(failure to dilate in the dark) pupil

Eye movements

Spontaneous conjugate horizontal roving

Horizontal ocular divergence at rest

Unilateral abducted eye at rest + ipsilateral

mydriasis

Vertical ocular axes divergence or “skewed

deviation”

“Ocular bobbing” – a brisk downward and slow

upward movements of the eyes with loss of

horizontal eye movements

“Ocular dipping”-slower, arrhythmic downward

movement followed by a faster upward

movement + normal reflex horizontal eye

movements.

Corneal reflexes – mediated by the fifth nerve

(afferent) and seventh nerve (efferent) in the

pons.

Oculocephalic reflexes (Doll’s eyes)

Full and conjugate eye movements

Metabolic encephalopathy

Thalamic hemorrhage / hydrocephalus

compressing sympathetic efferents

emerging from posterior hypothalamus

Acute, extensive bilateral pontine

hemorrhage. Narcotic drugs

Horner’s syndrome

Massive ipsilateral thalamic hemorrhage.

Intact midbrain / pons

Metabolic encephalopathy

Drowsiness

Increased intracranial pressure causing

bilateral sixth cranial nerve palsy

Third cranial nerve palsy causing medial

rectus paresis + parasympathetic damage

Pontine or cerebellar lesions

Bilateral pontine damage

Bilateral pontine damage

Lost in pontine damage

CNS depressants

Diffuse cerebral hemispheric lesion

Intact brainstem pathways extending from

Page 83: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxiii

v

vi

Incomplete conjugate eye movements with head

turning

No eye movement. Eyes move with the head as

if they are locked in the sockets

Oculovestibular response (Caloric test)

(Done if patient has cervical spine fracture)

Respiratory pattern

Classic Cheyne – Stokes

Rapid deep (Kussmaul) breathing (40-70 cycles

minute)

Apneustic breathing (slow breathing with long

pause in between inspiration and inspiration)

Cluster respiration

Shallow, regular 25-40cycles/minute

(eupnea) breathing)

Agonal gasps(irregular / ataxic breathing)

Shallow, respiratory-like movements with

irregular, non repetitive back-arching

the high cervical spinal cord and medulla

(where vestibular and proprioceptive input

from head turning originates) to the origin

of the third nerve in the midbrain

Damage to pontine gaze centre on the side

of gaze paresis or contralateral frontal

lobe

Massive brainstem damage or drug

intoxication (eg diazepam, barbiturates,

pancuronium)

Adjunct to the Doll’s eye test, acting as a

stronger stimulus to the reflex eye

movements but giving the same

information

Inconsistent localizing value

Mild bihemispheric damage

Metabolic encephalopathy

Pontomescencephalic damage

Metabolic encephalopathy

Mid pontine lesions

Midpontine lesions

Lower brainstem damage

Diffuse anoxia

Lower medulla and cervical spinal cord

Page 84: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxiv

APPENDIX III

Page 85: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxv

APPENDIX IV

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

Serial No ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hospital No--------------------------------------------------------------------

Name (initials only) ----------------------------------------------------------

Age/Sex ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marital status/socioeconomic status-----------------------------------------

Page 86: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxvi

Religion -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mode of referral Relatives Hospital/Clinic

Prayer house

Place of Onset of coma

Out-of hospital ICU

General Ward A&E

Time/date of onset of present illness

Presenting complaints--------------------------------------------------------------

Time/date of onset of coma--------------------------------------------------------

Time/date of presentation:---------------------------------------------------------

Time/date of onset of treatment:--------------------------------------------------

Co-morbidities/complications -------------------------------------------------------

Predisposing factors ----------------------------------------------------------------------

B. GENERAL PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

DAYS ON ADMISSION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 21 28

Pallor

Cyanosis

Jaundice

Dehydration

Oedema

Page 87: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxvii

Lymphadenopathy

Temp

Respiratory rate

Respiratory pattern

Pulse rate

Pulse rhythm

Blood pressure

Liver size

Kidney size

Ascites

C. NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION

1. GLASGOW COMA SCALE GCS

Score

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 21 28

a. Motor Responses (best limb)

Obeys command

Localizes pain

Withdraws from pain

Flexes to pain

6

5

4

3

Page 88: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxviii

Extension to pain

No response to pain

2

1

b. Verbal Response

Oriented

Confused conversation

Inappropriate speech

Incomprehensible - speech

No speech

5

4

3

2

1

c. Eye Opening

Spontaneous

To noise or speech

To pain

None

4

3

2

1

2. BRAINSTEM SIGN91

a. Pupillary Light Response

Sufficient in both eyes

Sufficient in one eye only

Reduced in both eyes

Reduced in one eye only

Absent

SCORE

4

2

2

1

0

b. Corneal Reflexes

Page 89: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

lxxxix

Present in both eyes

Present in one eye only

Absent

2

1

0

c. Oculocephalic Reflexes

Full

Minimal

None or eyes fixed

2

1

0

d. Spontaneous eye movements

Orienting

Roving conjugate

Roving dysconjugate

Other abnormal movements

None, fixed or immobile

4

3

2

1

0

e. Pupil size

Normal in both eyes

Normal in one eye only

Decreased in both eyes

Decreased in one eye

Increased in both eyes

Increased in one eyes

Increased and fixed in both eyes

6

3

4

2

2

1

0

Page 90: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xc

f. Motor Posturing

Normal

Decorticate

Decerebrate

Flaccid

3

2

1

0

3. FUNDOSCOPY

Normal

Papilloedema

Subhyaloid haemorrhage

Exudates

Disc atrophy

4. TWITCHINGS

None

Localized

Generalized

3

2

1

5. SKELETAL MUSCLE

TONE

Normal

Increased

Paratonic

Decreased

R L

Page 91: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xci

None

6. DEEP TENDON REFLEX

Normal

Increased

Decreased

None

R L

D LABORATORY/OTHER INVESTIGATION REPORTS

Blood sugar

Electrolytes

Urea

Full blood count (FBC)

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

Acute phase reactants

Liver functions test

Serum proteins

Blood gases (Sa02, Pa02, PaCo2, pH)

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)

Electroencephalogram (EEG)

Computerized scan (CTs)

Blood Drug level

Autopsy

Page 92: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xcii

E. CLINICAL INFORMATION

Date of definitive diagnosis ……………………………..

Cause of coma ………………………………………….

Type of outcome (good recovery with no disability, recovery with mild/moderate disability; recovery with severe disability,

vegetative state, death)

Date of outcome. ……………………………………………

APPENDIX V

QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE RESPONSE OF PATIENTS RELATIONS TO OUTCOME OF COMA

Please tick as your appropriate response

1. SERIAL NO 2. PATIENT’S HOSPTIAL NO

3. AGE 12-30 31-60 >60

4. SEX M F

5 OUTCOME ON DISCHARGE

Good recovery with no disability

Page 93: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xciii

Recovery with mild/moderate disability

Recovery with severe disability

Vegetative state

Death

6. LIKELY REASONS FOR OUTCOME

Presented to hospital early ( < 6 hours of onset)

Presented to hospital late ( > 6 hours of onset)

Received prompt medical attention

Did not receive prompt medical attention

There was inadequate financial support

7. WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT CAUSE OF COMA IN THIS PATIENT.

It is caused by enemies of progress

It is an act of God

It is caused by disease

It can treated

It cannot be treated

Page 94: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xciv

APPENDIX VI

CONSENT FORM

My name is ………………………………………………………………… I am a staff of the department of Medicine, University Hospital (UCH),

Ibadan.

I am carrying out a study to find out the prognostic factors in medical coma patients.

This questionnaire is to find out your own opinion on what determined the outcome of the illness of your patient or relation as the case may be.

All information given by you will be treated with utmost confidence. However, you are free to refuse to take part in the programme

Page 95: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xcv

……………………………………………… ……………………………………..

Signature/thumbprint of participant/Date Signature of Interviewer/Date

APPENDIX VII

SPECIFIC TREATMENTS GIVEN TO THE PATIENTS

i. Acute pyogenic meningitis. These patients were treated with empirical intravenous ceftriaxone 2-4g 12hourly while the result of the

sensitivity pattern was being awaited. After the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the organisms was known, the most effective antibiotic was

used. Duration of therapy ranged from 7-21/days, depending of the pathogens involved e.g. N. meningitides and H. influenzae 7-10 days,

for S. pneumoniae 10-14 days; for gram negative aerobic bacilli, 21 days.

ii. Tuberculous meningitis

These patients were treated with 4 drugs given via nasogastric tube:- isoniazid 5-10mg/kg (max 300) daily with pyridoxine 50-100mg;

rifampicin 10mg/kg (max 600mg) daily,

pyrazinamide 25mg/kg (max. 2.5g) daily, ethambutol 15-20mg/kg (max 1.5g) daily

All the 4 anti TB drugs were to be used for 2 months (intensive period), so that if patient improved, isoniazid and rifampicin would be

Page 96: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xcvi

continued for 10-16 months. Tab dexamethasone 8-16mg/daily was prescribed for the initial 1-2 months, after initial 48 hours intravenous

doses.

iii. Viral meningoencephalitis

These patients were treated with empirical acyclovir 10mg/kg/dose (max 500mg) 8 hourly by slow infusion for 14-21 days, mannitol,

0.25g/kg every 3 hours or 0.5g/kg every 6hour in 20% solution intravenously over 20 minutes if there were signs of raised intracranial

pressure. Phenytoin 300mg daily for control of seizures

iv. Cerebral malaria The patients were given I.M Artemether (Paluther) 3.2mg/kg (max 160mg) stat, then 1.6mg/kg (max 80mg) 12 hourly

for 3 days.

v. Diabetic keto acidotic coma The treatment consisted of fluid replacement, hourly solube insulin, potassium replacement, correction of

metabolic acidosis and control of infection.

(b) Fluid replacement: 1 litre of 0.9% saline stat, then 1 litre in 1 hour, 1 litre over 2 hours, 1 liter over 4 hours, then 1 litre 6hourly, so that

patients got atleast 8-10 litres in the first 24 hours. The rate of infusion was adjusted according to renal status and level of hyperglycemic

reduction. 5% dextrose-saline was introduced when the blood glucose was < 15mmol/L

(c) Insulin therapy control: Intravenous soluble human insulin, 6-10 U bolus, then 6U hourly till the blood glucose was < 15mmol/L (blood

sugar monitored hourly), then 6U intramuscularly every 4 hours, (adjusted 4+2 hourly according to blood glucose) until patients regained

consciousness. The estimated patients daily insulin requirements were then determined either from amount of insulin used over the previous 24

hours or 0.1-1.0 U/kg/day given subcutaneously.

(d) Potassium replacement: The amount of potassium chloride (KCL) added to 1L of 0.9% saline was based on serum K+ level and the renal

status of patients. Once the patients had made >500mls of urine, the K+ replacement was commenced as follows: serum K+ (mmo/L) of <3.0,

<4.0, <5.0 were corrected with KCL (mmol/L) of 40, 30 and 20 respectively every 6 hours. When patients regained consciousness they were

given slow K tablets in appropriate doses (8mmol per tablet).

(e) Metabolic acidosis may correct spontaneously but if urine pH was still < 7.0 and the HCO3- level was <10mmol/L, 1ml/kg of 4.8% NaHCO3

was given in 0.9% saline over 1hour.

Page 97: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xcvii

(f) Infection was controlled by giving empiric ceftriaxone 1-2g IV 12hourly and metronidazole 100ml (500mg) 6-8hourly.

vi. Hyper osmolar nonketotic coma: Same principles as in DKA with the following modifications

(a) Fluid replacement: rapid (up to 10L in the first 24hours) monitored via pulse, BP, urine output and jugular venous pressure, then slower

rehydration (half of DKA rate) over 48hours.

(b) Insulin therapy: was usually delayed, as hyperglycemia was reduced by rehydration. Insulin was given at 1-2U/hourly after iv 4-6U bolus

(higher in obesity) till blood glucose became < 15mmol/L; then at 1-2U/4 hourly I.M until patient regained consciousness. After stabilization,

patient may continue subcutaneous insulin or recommence oral hypoglycemia drugs.

(c) Potassium replacement as above, but may be delayed

(d) NaHCO3 may not be needed.

(e) Infection as above

vii. Hypoglycemia: Patients received intravenous (IV) 50mls of 50% dextrose in double dilutions boluses, then continuous IV 5-10%

dextrose in saline IL 4-6hourly until recovery.

viii Hepatic coma: treatment consisted of low dietary protein of about 40g/days and high carbohydrate diet, daily rectal washout with soap and

water enema, IV metronidazole 500mg 6-8 hourly, crushed neomycin 1-2g 6hourly or syrup lactulose 20-30g hourly (until catharsis of 2-3 bowel

movements), then 20-30g 6hrly, all via nasogastic tube. Also had 5 – 10% dextrose infusions and vitamins.

ix Uremic coma Patients typically had hemodialysis 3 times a week, fluid retriction to 750mls plus previous days urine output, high doses

of frusemide 80-200mg/daily, antihypertensives, mainly ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers and correction of anemia with blood

transfusion

x. Alcohol coma (Osmotic demyelination syndrome)

Patient had continous 5% dextrose-saline IL 8hourly with vitamin. B complex 1ml/day; IV dexamethasone 8mg 6hourly

xi Gallamine poisoning (Gallamine is a competitive, nondepolarising neuromuscular end plate blocker. It therefore produces flaccid

paralysis that typically last for 30-60 minutes, and longer if larger doses are taken. CNS toxic effects include depression and coma. Antidote is

pralidoxime (cholinesterase regenerator) which was not available for patient. However patient had gastric lavage performed using normal saline

Page 98: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xcviii

and IV 5% dextrose-saline IL 6hourly + vit B complex 1ml in each IL of fluid until he became conscious.

xii Strokes (intracerebral hemorrhage, large infarctive)

The treatment regimes consisted of elevation of head of bed to 35 degrees to prevent regurgitation, maintenance of water and electrolyte balance

with IV 0.9% saline 3000ml/daily, feeding by nasogastric tube after 24hours; usually liquid diet 2000ml + 1000ml of water daily in divided doses

every 2 hours. When patients regained consciousness, swallowing mechanisms were tested daily and if normal, graduated diet was introduced.

Physiotherapy was introduce from the first day of admission, cerebral edema decompression was with IV infusion of 20% mannitol solution 1-

2g/kg (~ 500ml) over 10-20 minutes every 8hours for 48hours, and IV frusemide 40mg 12 hourly for > 48hours. Hypertension was not treated for

atleast 48 hours except when systolic and diastolic pressures were > 220mmHg and > 120mmHg respectively, otherwise nifedipine 20mg P.O

daily was given. Subcutaneous heparin 5000U 8hourly was given in infarctive stroke. All patients had supportive care and infection control with

antibiotics.

xiii Hypertensive encephalopathy: The aim of treatment was to reduce diastolic BP to ~ 100 – 110mmHg within 4hours. The drugs of

choice, sodium nitroprusside infusion and labetalol were not available. Therefore patient was given IV hydralazine 20mg slowly, repeated every

30 minutes to a maximum of 200mg dose. Then the BP was gradually reduced over several days with the following drugs: IV frusemide 40-80mg

daily, tab nifedipine 20mg 12hourly, tab atenolol 50-100mg.

xiv Status epilepticus: was controlled with 20mg of diazepam in normal saline infusion at the rate of 1.5mg/minute with maintenance dose of

IV phenytoin 20mg/kg at a rate of 20-30ml/minute.

xv Cardiac arrest patients were managed in the I.C.U with assisted mechanical ventilation and cardiac monitoring.

xvi Primary CNS lymphoma patients received: IV Dexamethasone 16mg stat, then tab 8mg 8hrly. They were also on antiretroviral therapy.

xvii Sepsis syndrome, patients received blood transfusions, intravenous fluids and metronidazole infusion 1500mg/daily in 3 divided doses

and various antibiotics according to sensitivity results. All had supportive care.

Page 99: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

xcix

Table 19: Prediction of the outcome of medical coma using Glasgow Coma Scale

Days of

admission

GCS Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic-ischemic Others

Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV

D A D A D A D A D A

1 3 9 2 18.8 91.3 22 4 40 63.6 7 1 17.9 80 2 - 33.3 100 - - 0 100

>3 39 21 33 7 32 4 4 4 1 2

3 3 20 - 55.6 100 23 3 53.5 72.7 11 - 47.8 100 1 - 20 100 - 1 0 83.3

>3 16 23 20 8 22 5 4 4 3 5

7 3 4 - 30.8 100 11 - 52.4 100 6 - 35.3 100 1 - 50 100 1 - 33.3 100

>3 9 18 10 10 11 5 1 4 2 5

14 3 1 - 33.3 100 2 - 40 100 2 - 66.7 100 - - 0 100 1 - 50 100

>3 2 7 3 9 1 3 - 3 1 3

28 3 - - 0 100 - - 0 100 - - 0 100 - - 0 100 - - 0 100

>3 5 5 2 8 - 2 3 3 1 2

A-Alive

D-Dead

Page 100: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

c

Table 19: Prediction of the outcome of medical coma using Glasgow

Coma Scale

Days of

admission

GCS Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic-ischemic Others

Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV

D A D A D A D A D A

1 3 9 2 18.8 91.3 22 4 40 63.6 7 1 17.9 80 2 - 33.3 100 - - 0 100

>3 39 21 33 7 32 4 4 4 1 2

3 3 20 - 55.6 100 23 3 53.5 72.7 11 - 47.8 100 1 - 20 100 - 1 0 83.3

>3 16 23 20 8 22 5 4 4 3 5

7 3 4 - 30.8 100 11 - 52.4 100 6 - 35.3 100 1 - 50 100 1 - 33.3 100

>3 9 18 10 10 11 5 1 4 2 5

14 3 1 - 33.3 100 2 - 40 100 2 - 66.7 100 - - 0 100 1 - 50 100

>3 2 7 3 9 1 3 - 3 1 3

28 3 - - 0 100 - - 0 100 - - 0 100 - - 0 100 - - 0 100

>3 5 5 2 8 - 2 3 3 1 2

A-Alive

D-Dead

Page 101: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

ci

Table 20: Prediction of outcome of medical coma using the brainstem sign score

(BSS)

Days of

admission

Median

BSS

Metabolic Cerebrovascular Infection Hypoxic-ischemic Others

Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV Outcome PPV NPV

D A D A D A D A D A

1 ≤13 46 13 100 0 61 13 100 0 31 5 100 0 8 4 100 0 5 4 100 0

>13 - - - - - - 4 - - -

3 ≤13 33 7 97.1 68.2 48 10 100 23.1 27 5 100 0 6 3 100 25 5 3 100 25

>13 1 15 - 3 - - - 1 - 1

7 ≤13 13 2 92.6 88.2 23 7 92 41.7 13 3 100 40 3 2 100 50 2 - 100 100

>13 1 15 2 5 - 2 - - 2 - 4

14 ≤13 3 - 100 100 7 7 87.5 30 - 2 0 33.3 - - 0 100 1 1 100 50

>13 - 5 1 3 - 1 - 3 - 1

28 ≤13 - 1 0 75 2 4 100 50 - 1 0 0 - - 0 100 - 1 0 50

>13 - 3 - 4 - - - 1 - 1

A-Alive

D-Dead

Table 21: Multiple Regression Analysis

S/N Variables Day 1 Day 3 Day 7

Day 14

Page 102: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN

cii

Sig. = Significant value

S.E. = Standard error

CI = Confidence interval

Sig S.E 95%C1 Sig S.E 95%C1 Sig S.E 95%C1 Sig S.E

95%C1

lower upper lower upper lower upper lower upper

1 Relevant investigation 0.03 0.6 1.14 12.14 0.462 0.774 0.39 8.1 0.94 1.1 0.11 7.51 0.991 13580.4 0.000 0.000

2 Age of patients 0.112 0.018 0.993 1.065 0.314 0.023 0.98 1.07 0.615 0.033 0.95 1.1 0.991 500.6 0.000 0.000

3 Present after 6hrs of coma 0.727 0.132 0.81 1.36 0.212 0.160 0.6 1.12 0.246 0.24 0.47 1.21 0.994 2163.5 0.000 0.000

4 Family support 0.322 0.377 0.69 3.04 0.597 0.550 0.46 3.9 0.458 0.82 0.37 9.27 0.994 4128.2 0.000 0.000

5 Family knowledge 0.575 0.263 0.52 1.45 0.759 0.359 0.44 1.81 0.681 0.57 0.26 -2.4 0.991 5645.6 0.000 0.000

6 Cause of coma 0.16 0.052 0.84 1.03 0.83 0.068 0.89 1.16 0.567 0.097 0.78 1.15 0.990 2375.1 0.000 0.000

7 GCS 0.355 0.185 0.83 1.71 0.044 0.152 0.55 0.99 0.355 0.18 0.59 1.21 0.992 1368.7 0.000 0.000