prof.tamura july19 apss2010 wind-universitatea tokyo
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
1/156
WindWind--induced Response of Buildingsinduced Response of Buildingsand Control Techniquesand Control Techniques
Yukio TamuraYukio TamuraWind Engineering Research CenterWind Engineering Research Center
APSSAPSS The University of TokyoThe University of TokyoJuly 19, 2010July 19, 2010
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
2/156
Strong Wind EventsStrong Wind Events
MonsoonMonsoon
ExtratropicalExtratropical CycloneCyclone
Tropical CycloneTropical Cyclone
(Typhoon, Hurricane, Cyclone)(Typhoon, Hurricane, Cyclone)
TornadoTornado
DownburstDownburst
Dust DevilDust Devil Gravity Wind (Gravity Wind (KatabaticKatabatic Wind)Wind)
etc.etc.
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
3/156
Tropical CyclonesTropical Cyclones(Hurricanes, Typhoons)(Hurricanes, Typhoons)
Wind ClimatesWind Climates
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
4/156
www.nemas.net/edu/thunderstorms
DownburstDownburst
Wind ClimatesWind Climates
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
5/156
TornadoTornado
Wind ClimatesWind Climates
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
6/156
DownburstDownburst
Wind ClimatesWind Climates
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
7/156
Dust DevilDust Devil
Wind ClimatesWind Climates
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
8/156
Wind ClimatesWind Climates
Gravity Wind (Gravity Wind (KatabaticKatabatic Wind)Wind)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
9/156
Cape Town, South AfricaCape Town, South Africa (courtesy of A.(courtesy of A. GoligerGoliger))
Wind ClimatesWind Climates
Gravity Wind (Gravity Wind (KatabaticKatabatic Wind)Wind)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
10/156
Strong Wind EventsStrong Wind Events
MonsoonMonsoon
ExtratropicalExtratropical CycloneCyclone
Tropical Cyclones(Typhoon, Hurricane, Cyclone)
TornadoTornado DownburstDownburst
Dust DevilDust Devil Gravity WindsGravity Winds
etc.etc.
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
11/156
BackgroundBackground
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
12/156
WindWind--induced Damage to Tall Buildingsinduced Damage to Tall Buildings
ShitenShitennojinoji 55--story Pagodastory Pagoda47.8m47.8m--high (Wooden Structure)high (Wooden Structure)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
13/156
Central pillarCentral pillar
((ShinbashiraShinbashira))
32.56m
Central Pillar in the 5Central Pillar in the 5--story Pagodastory Pagoda
HoryujiHoryuji (The 7th Century) World Oldest Wooden Building(The 7th Century) World Oldest Wooden Building
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
14/156
Central PillarCentral Pillar
Repeated contact andRepeated contact andseparation from the towerseparation from the towerstructurestructure
GateGate--bar Effectbar Effect(Ishida,1996)(Ishida,1996)
Contribution to the pagodaContribution to the pagodassstabilizationstabilization
Increase in dampingIncrease in damping
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
15/156
WindWind--induced Damage to Tall Buildingsinduced Damage to Tall Buildings
(Osaka, Japan, 1934)(Osaka, Japan, 1934)ASAHI NEWS PAPERASAHI NEWS PAPER
ShitenShitennojinoji 55--story Pagodastory Pagoda47.8m47.8m--high (Wooden Structure)high (Wooden Structure)
TyhpoonTyhpoonMurotoMurotoSep. 21, 1934.Sep. 21, 1934.
Max Peak 60m/sMax Peak 60m/s
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
16/156
WindWind--induced Damage to Tall Buildingsinduced Damage to Tall Buildings
MoleMole AntonellianaAntonelliana(Turin, Italy, 1953)(Turin, Italy, 1953)LA DOMENICA DEL CORRIERELA DOMENICA DEL CORRIERE
The MoleThe MoleAntonellianaAntonellianacollapses. An extraordinarycollapses. An extraordinarywind storm occurred inwind storm occurred inTurin on May 23, 1953,Turin on May 23, 1953,breaking off the spire of thebreaking off the spire of the
famous monument, andfamous monument, andcausing the collapse of acausing the collapse of a
4545--meter length. The Molemeter length. The MoleAntonellianaAntonelliana waswasthe tallestthe tallestmasonry building in Europemasonry building in Europe(167.5m)(167.5m)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
17/156
Development of Design & ConstructionDevelopment of Design & Construction
Methods for Tall BuildingsMethods for Tall Buildings A record of fights with strong windsA record of fights with strong winds
GustaveGustave AlexandreAlexandre Eiffel (1832Eiffel (1832--1923)1923)
Eiffel TowerEiffel Towerdrawn bydrawn by G.A.EiffelG.A.Eiffel (Davenport, 1975)(Davenport, 1975)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
18/156
MagnitudeMagnitude
Max. Ground AccelerationMax. Ground Acceleration FatalitiesFatalities
InjuredInjured
Damaged BuildingsDamaged Buildings(Engineered Buildings10%)(Engineered Buildings10%) Burned Down BuildingsBurned Down Buildings
Economic LossEconomic Loss
Kobe Earthquake (Kobe Earthquake (January 17, 1995)January 17, 1995)
7.27.2
818 cm/s818 cm/s22
6,4326,43235,00035,000
512,800512,800
7,0007,000
150 Billion USD150 Billion USD(estimated)(estimated)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
19/156
Kobe Earthquake (Kobe Earthquake (January 17, 1995)January 17, 1995)
ChuetsuChuetsu Earthquake (Earthquake (OctoberOctober 2323,, 20042004))
MagnitudeMagnitude
Max. Ground AccelerationMax. Ground Acceleration
FatalitiesFatalities InjuredInjured
7.27.2
818 cm/s818 cm/s22
6,4326,43235,00035,000
6.86.8
1,3081,308 cm/scm/s22
51514,4964,496
MagnitudeMagnitude
Max. Ground AccelerationMax. Ground Acceleration
FatalitiesFatalities InjuredInjured
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
20/156
MagnitudeMagnitude
Max. Ground AccelerationMax. Ground Acceleration
FatalitiesFatalities InjuredInjured
Kobe Earthquake (Kobe Earthquake (January 17, 1995)January 17, 1995)
7.27.2
818 cm/s818 cm/s22
6,4326,43235,00035,000
MagnitudeMagnitude
Max. Ground AccelerationMax. Ground Acceleration FatalitiesFatalities
InjuredInjured
ChuetsuChuetsu Earthquake (Earthquake (OctoberOctober 2323,, 20042004))6.86.8
1,3081,308 cm/scm/s22
51514,4964,496
ExtremeEarth
quakes
ExtremeEart
hquakes
AccAccGroundGrou
nd 1G1G
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
21/156
Damage due to Typhoon WindsDamage due to Typhoon Winds
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
22/156
Damage to a roof of a gymnasiumDamage to a roof of a gymnasium
Damages in Miyakojima due to TyphoonDamages in Miyakojima due to Typhoon
MaemiMaemi, Sept. 11, 2003, Sept. 11, 2003
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
23/156
Damages in Miyakojima due to TyphoonDamages in Miyakojima due to Typhoon
MaemiMaemi, Sept. 11, 2003, Sept. 11, 2003
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
24/156
Damage due to wind borne debrisDamage due to wind borne debris
Damages in Miyakojima due to TyphoonDamages in Miyakojima due to Typhoon
MaemiMaemi, Sept. 11, 2003, Sept. 11, 2003
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
25/156
TyphoonTyphoon MaemiMaemi, Sept. 11, 2003, Sept. 11, 2003
Miyakojima Island Meteorological StationMiyakojima Island Meteorological Station
(Okinawa Pref., Japan)(Okinawa Pref., Japan)
Maximum Mean Wind SpeedMaximum Mean Wind Speed
Maximum Peak GustMaximum Peak Gust(10(10thth highest in Japan)highest in Japan)
Lowest PressureLowest Pressure( 8( 8thth lowest in Japan)lowest in Japan)
Miyakojima SelfMiyakojima Self--Defense ForceDefense ForceMaximum Peak GustMaximum Peak Gust
Furukawa Electric Co. LtdFurukawa Electric Co. LtdMaximum Peak GustMaximum Peak Gust
: 34.8: 34.8 m/sm/s
:: 74.174.1 m/sm/s
: 912: 912 hPahPa
:: 87.087.0 m/sm/s
:: > 90> 90 m/sm/s
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
26/156
TyphoonTyphoon MaemiMaemi, Sept. 11, 2003, Sept. 11, 2003
Miyakojima Island Meteorological StationMiyakojima Island Meteorological Station
(Okinawa Pref., Japan)(Okinawa Pref., Japan)
Maximum Mean Wind SpeedMaximum Mean Wind Speed
Maximum Peak GustMaximum Peak Gust(10(10thth highest in Japan)highest in Japan)
Lowest PressureLowest Pressure( 8( 8thth lowest in Japan)lowest in Japan)
Miyakojima SelfMiyakojima Self--Defense ForceDefense ForceMaximum Peak GustMaximum Peak Gust
Furukawa Electric Co. LtdFurukawa Electric Co. LtdMaximum Peak GustMaximum Peak Gust
: 34.8: 34.8 m/sm/s
:: 74.174.1 m/sm/s
: 912: 912 hPahPa
: 87.0: 87.0 m/sm/s
: > 90: > 90 m/sm/s
ExtremeTropica
lCyclones
ExtremeTropic
alCyclones
VV3speak
3speak
80m/s80m/s90m/s90m
/s
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
27/156
Seismic Force & Wind ForceSeismic Force & Wind Force
Bas
eShear
Bas
eShear
Building HeightBuilding Height
200200 300 m300 m
Seismic ForceSeismic Force
Wind ForceWind Force
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
28/156
Seismic Force & Wind ForceSeismic Force & Wind Force
Tall BuildingsTall Buildings-- Seismic ForceSeismic ForceInertial ForceInertial Force Light Weight & FlexibleLight Weight & Flexible-- Wind ForceWind ForceSurface PressureSurface Pressure Massive & StiffMassive & Stiff
Seismic ForceSeismic ForceWind Force (Wind Force (HH< 200m)< 200m) Buildings in Japan are basicallyBuildings in Japan are basically
designeddesigned against seismic force.against seismic force. Vulnerable to Daily WindVulnerable to Daily Wind
Auxiliary Damping DevicesAuxiliary Damping Devices Ex. in Japan
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
29/156
Pedestrian Level WindsPedestrian Level Winds
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
30/156
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
31/156
Courtesy of AdamCourtesy of Adam GoligerGoliger
.and we can ignore wind effects..and we can ignore wind effects.
Nobody will ever notice them.Nobody will ever notice them.
Can we save 100, 000USD by notCan we save 100, 000USD by not
conducting wind tunnel tests ?conducting wind tunnel tests ?
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
32/156
Wind Environment for Pedestrians andWind Environment for Pedestrians and
Surrounding BuildingsSurrounding Buildings
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
33/156
Courtesy of AdamCourtesy of Adam GoligerGoliger
Then, we can enjoy strong winds aroundThen, we can enjoy strong winds around
the tall building !the tall building !
Monroe Effect
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
34/156
.. but I said.. but I said I donI dont wish to pay mucht wish to pay much
more in the future.more in the future.
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
35/156
e.g. The Metropolis of Tokyoe.g. The Metropolis of Tokyo
For buildings higherFor buildings higher than 100m and with a totalfloor area larger than 10floor area larger than 1055 mm22
-- Wind tunnel tests or CFD prWind tunnel tests or CFD predictedictions
-- Evaluation by given assessmEvaluation by given assessment methods
-- Field measurements before and afterField measurements before and afterconstruction (at least 1 year each)construction (at least 1 year each)
Municipal Bylaws on EnvironmentalMunicipal Bylaws on Environmental
AssessmentAssessment
A E l f St f P d t i dA E l f St f P d t i d
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
36/156
An Example of Steps for Pedestrians andAn Example of Steps for Pedestrians and
Surrounding BuildingsSurrounding Buildings NEC HQ OfficeNEC HQ Office
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
37/156
Habitability to Building VibrationsHabitability to Building Vibrations
Probabilistic Human Perception
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
38/156
Probabilistic Human PerceptionThreshold
Tamura (1998)Tamura (1998)
5050
1010
55
22
11
2020
0.50.5
0.20.2
0.10.1
AccelerationAmplitude(cm
/s
Ac
celerationAmplitude(cm
/s22))
2%2%
10%10%
90%90%
DenoonDenoon, 2000,, 2000,Average valueAverage value
(Full(Full--scale)scale)
0.10.1 0.2 0.50.2 0.5 11 22 5 105 10
Frequency (Hz)Frequency (Hz)
90%90%
99%99%
50%50%
10%10%2%2%1%1%
Jeary et al., 1988 (FullJeary et al., 1988 (Full--scale)scale)
AIJ G id li 2004AIJ G id li 2004
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
39/156
AIJ Guidelines 2004AIJ Guidelines 2004
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Habitability to Building VibratGuidelines for the Evaluation of Habitability to Building Vibrationion
HH--1010
HH--3030HH--5050HH--7070HH--9090
0.10.1 0.2 0.5 1 20.2 0.5 1 2 55Frequency (Hz)Frequency (Hz)
2020
55
22
11
0.50.5
1010
Annu
alPeakA
ccelerat
ion
Annu
alPeakAcceleration
(cm/s(cm/s22))
Deterministic Evaluation MethodDeterministic Evaluation Method
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
40/156
0.1
1
10
100
0.1 1 10(Hz)
(cm/s2)
H1
H3
High-rise ResidencesOfficesHotels Detached Houses
0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10Frequency (Hz)
Annual
Maximum
Acceleration(cm/s
Annual
Maximum
Accelerati
on(cm/s22))100
10
1
0.1
HH--9090
HH--1010
HH--5050
AIJ Guidelines 2004AIJ Guidelines 2004Deterministic Evaluation MethodDeterministic Evaluation Method
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
41/156
ISO10137 (2007)ISO10137 (2007)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
42/156
ISO10137 (2007)ISO10137 (2007)Bases for design of structuresBases for design of structures Serviceability of buildings andServiceability of buildings and
walkways against vibrationwalkways against vibration
0.06 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 20.06 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 55HzHz
1st Natural Frequency1st Natural Frequency ff00
5050
2020
1010
55
22
AnnualPeak
Acceleration
An
nualPeak
Acceleration
OfficesOffices
ResidencesResidences
(cm/s(cm/s22))
HH--9090HH--7070HH--5050HH--3030HH--1010
DampingDevices
DampingDevices
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
43/156
Various Types of WindVarious Types of Wind--induced Vibrationsinduced Vibrations
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
44/156
VortexVortex ResonanceResonance
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
45/156
VortexVortex--ResonanceResonance
Circular ChimneyCircular Chimney
HighHigh speed Vortexspeed Vortex ResonanceResonance
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
46/156
HighHigh--speed Vortexspeed Vortex--ResonanceResonance
Circular Observatory TowerCircular Observatory Towerdue to vortices shed from the top enddue to vortices shed from the top end
OvallingOvalling
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
47/156
OvallingOvalling
Circular ChimneyCircular Chimney
VortexVortex ResonanceResonance
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
48/156
VortexVortex--ResonanceResonance
Circular Pipe BeamsCircular Pipe Beams Karman VortexKarman Vortex
P i di Sh ddi f K V tiP i di Sh ddi f K V ti
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
49/156
Periodic Shedding of Karman VorticesPeriodic Shedding of Karman Vortices
VortexVortex--ResonanceResonance
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
50/156
VortexVortex--ResonanceResonance
Rectangular PrismRectangular Prism Karman VortexKarman Vortex
GallopingGalloping
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
51/156
GallopingGalloping
Transmission LinesTransmission Lines
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
52/156
SnowSnow--stuck to Electric Wire due to Windstuck to Electric Wire due to Windsnowsnow
snowsnow
windwind
windwind
Galloping and Torsional FlutterGalloping and Torsional Flutter
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
53/156
Galloping and Torsional FlutterGalloping and Torsional Flutter
Tacoma Narrows BridgeTacoma Narrows Bridge
Mechanism of Torsional FlutterMechanism of Torsional Flutter
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
54/156
VortexVortex
VortexVortex
Mechanism of Torsional FlutterMechanism of Torsional Flutter
Pressure distribution enhances the motion !Pressure distribution enhances the motion !
RainRain--WindWind--induced Vibrationinduced Vibration
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
55/156
RainRain WindWind induced Vibrationinduced Vibration
Suspension Bridge CablesSuspension Bridge Cables
RainRain--WindWind--induced Vibrationinduced Vibration
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
56/156
rivuletrivulet
with rainwith rain
Raina WindW d induced Vibrationduced V b at o
Suspension Bridge CablesSuspension Bridge Cables
without rainwithout rain
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
57/156
Characteristics of WindCharacteristics of Wind--induced Responseinduced Response
WindWind--induced Responses of Tallinduced Responses of TallB ildiB ildi
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
58/156
BuildingsBuildings
AlongAlong--wind Displacementwind Displacement
Crosswind DisplacementCrosswind Displacement
Torsional DisplacementTorsional Displacement(at the corner)(at the corner)
Power spectra of wind forces acting on a highPower spectra of wind forces acting on a high--riserisebuilding modelbuilding model
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
59/156
(2(2HH/3, Wind tunnel, Kikuchi & Hibi 1995)/3, Wind tunnel, Kikuchi & Hibi 1995)
CCDD
Force balanceForce balancePressurePressure
AlongAlong--windwind CrosswindCrosswind
SS
ffvvBBS =S =UU
Strouhal NumberStrouhal Number
ffB /B /UUffB /B /UU
ffSS((ff))//((qqHH
BHBH))22
ffSS((ff))
//((qqHH
BHBH))22
building modelbuilding model
NakanoNakano DendenDenden BuildingBuilding
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
60/156
FullFull--scalescaleFullFull--scalescale
WindWindTunnelTunnel
WindWindTunnelTunnel
NakanoNakano DendenDenden BuildingBuilding
Fujimoto et al., 1980Fujimoto et al., 1980
NagasakiNagasaki HuisHuis Ten BoschTen Bosch DomtorenDomtoren
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
61/156
Typhoon 9121
rmsrms
maxmax Win
dtu
nnel
Wind
tunnel
Along-wind Crosswind
NagasakiNagasaki HuisHuis Ten BoschTen Bosch DomtorenDomtoren
H= 99.4m
Variation of Responses withVariation of Responses with
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
62/156
Acceleration ResponsesAcceleration Responses
AlongAlong--windwind :: XXMAXMAX UU2.52.5CrosswindCrosswind :: YYMAXMAX UU3.73.7
Displacement ResponsesDisplacement Responses
AlongAlong--windwind :: XXMAXMAX UU2.12.1(Mean component(Mean component UU22))CrosswindCrosswind :: YY
MAXMAX UU3.13.1
pp
Mean Wind SpeedMean Wind Speed
Example !!
ctract
raCrosswind ForceCrosswind Force
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
63/156
1
0 f0BU
|H(i f)|2 Generalize
dForceSpec
Generalize
dForceSpec
increase ofincrease of
wind speedwind speed
SSFF ((ff00))
Mechanical
Mechanical
Admittance
Admittance
ffBBUU
Resonant ComponentResonant Component
FF22 ff00 SSFF ((ff00))AARR == 44KK22 FF 22AlongAlong--wind Forcewind Force
Torsional MomentTorsional Moment
AlongAlong--wind Response & Crosswind Responsewind Response & Crosswind Response
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
64/156
AlongAlong--windwind ::
XX
((tt
) =) =
XX
mm ++
xx
((tt
))
Crosswind :Crosswind : zero meanzero mean YY((tt) =) =yy((tt))
AlongAlong--windwind
CrosswindCrosswind AlongAlong--windwind
CrosswindCrosswind
AlongAlong--wind Response & Crosswind Responsewind Response & Crosswind Response
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
65/156
AlongAlong--windwindYY CrosswindCrosswind
XXAlongAlong--windwind
XX
CrosswindCrosswindYY
XX--dirdir..AlongAlong--windwind CrosswindCrosswind HH > 85m85m YY--dirdir..AlongAlong--windwind CrosswindCrosswind HH < 150m< 150m CrosswindCrosswind >> AlongAlong--windwind H >H > 150m150m
20m20m40m40mCategory IICategory IIUU00=35m/s=35m/s 100y100y--recurrencerecurrenceWindWind
WindWind
AlongAlong--wind Response & Crosswind Responsewind Response & Crosswind Response
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
66/156
AlongAlong--windwindCrosswindCrosswind AlongAlong--windwind
CrosswindCrosswind
0
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
67/156
00
22
44
66
00 55 1010 1515 2020 2525 3030
Displacement
Displacement
cmcm
TimeTime
RTKRTKGPSGPS
AccelerometerAccelerometer
--2020
--1010
001010
2020
Accelerati
on
Acceleration
cm/scm/s 22
QuasiQuasi--static componentstatic component
Resonant componentResonant component
Static componentStatic component
ss
Accelerometer and GPSAccelerometer and GPS
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
68/156
Dynamic Characteristics of BuildingsDynamic Characteristics of Buildings
Japanese Damping DatabaseJapanese Damping Database
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
69/156
Japanese Damping DatabaseJ p p g
Number of Buildings and Structures285
SteelBuildings
(Steel)
SteelEncased
ReinforcedConcreteBuildings
(SRC)
ReinforcedConcreteBuildings
(RC)
Tower-LikeNon-Building
Structures
137 43 25 80HAve.= 101m HAve.= 60m HAve.= 124m
15.5m 282.3m 11.6m167.4m 10.8m129.8m 9.1m226.0m
Office :Hotel :
Others :
992513
Apartment :Office :School :Others :
352049
Chimney :Lattice :Tower :Others :
2624236
(S)(S) (SRC)(SRC) (RC)(RC)
Fundamental Natural PeriodFundamental Natural Period(Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
70/156
Building Height (m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
H
N
aturalPeriod
(s)
T1 H, r0.020 0.94
T1
f1 = 50/H
(Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
Fundamental Natural PeriodFundamental Natural Period(RC/SRC Buildings)(RC/SRC Buildings)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
71/156
0
1
2
3
0 50 100 150 200
RC
SRC
Building Height (m)H
NaturalPeri
od
(s)
T1 H, r0.015 0.94
T1
(RC/SRC Buildings)(RC/SRC Buildings)
f1 = 67/H
Higher Translational ModeHigher Translational ModeNatural PeriodsNatural Periods (Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
72/156
Natural PeriodsNatural Periods (Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
Fundamental Natural Period (s)
0
1
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
T1
Natu
ralPeriod
(s)
T2,T3,T4 2nd Mode
T2 T
1, r
T3 T
1, r
T4 T
1, r
0.33 0.99
0.18 0.95
0.13 0.91
3rd Mode
4th Mode
f3 = 280/H
f2 = 150/H
f4 = 380/H
Torsional Mode Natural PeriodsTorsional Mode Natural Periods
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
73/156
Fundamental Natural Period (s)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7T
1
TorsionalNatura
lPeriod
(s)
TT
T1
, r0.75 0.94
TT
(Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
fT
= 67/H
Damped Free Oscillation (FullDamped Free Oscillation (Full--scale)scale)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
74/156
p (p ( ))
--0.080.08
00
0.080.08
00 55 1010 1515 2020 2525 3030 3535 4040
Amplitu
de(cm)
Amplitu
de(cm)
Time (s)Time (s)
0.040.04
--0.040.04
Damping Ratio = 0.93%Damping Ratio = 0.93%
Damping Ratios & Natural PeriodsDamping Ratios & Natural Periods
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
75/156
(Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
(JDD)(JDD)
Damping Ratios & Natural PeriodsDamping Ratios & Natural Periods
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
76/156
(RC/SRC Buildings)(RC/SRC Buildings)
0.1 1
1st Mode
2nd Mode3rd Mode
320.50.20.05
Natural Period (s)T
Damping
Ratio
0.1
0.01
0.001
(JDD)(JDD)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
77/156
Damping in BuildingsDamping in Buildings
Estimation of dampingEstimation of damping-- no theoretical methodno theoretical method
-- based on fullbased on full--scale datascale data
significant scattersignificant scatter
Dispersion of Damping DataDispersion of Damping Data
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
78/156
Structural MaterialsStructural Materials
Soil & FoundationsSoil & Foundations
Architectural FinishingArchitectural Finishing
JointsJoints
NonNon--structural Membersstructural Members
Vibration AmplitudeVibration Amplitude
NonNon--stationarity of Excitationsstationarity of Excitations
Vibration Measuring MethodsVibration Measuring MethodsDamping Evaluation TechniquesDamping Evaluation Techniques
etc.etc.
Causes of Damping in BuildingsCauses of Damping in Buildings
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
79/156
(Structural Frames) INTERNAL FRICTION DAMPING(Structural Frames) INTERNAL FRICTION DAMPING
(Wind Forces)(Wind Forces)
AERODYNAMIC DAMPINGAERODYNAMIC DAMPINGVibrationVibration
(Damping Devices)(Damping Devices)
TMD, HMD, TLD, AMDTMD, HMD, TLD, AMD
(Non(Non--elastic Behavior) HYSTERETIC DAMPINGelastic Behavior) HYSTERETIC DAMPING
(Secondary Structural Members,(Secondary Structural Members,NonNon--loadload--bearing Walls, Cladding)bearing Walls, Cladding)FRICTION DAMPINGFRICTION DAMPING
(Damping Devices)(Damping Devices)
HYSTERETIC, VISCOUS,HYSTERETIC, VISCOUS,VISCOVISCO--ELASTIC, FRICTION,ELASTIC, FRICTION,AVS etc.AVS etc.
(Foundation)(Foundation)(Ground)(Ground)
INTERNAL FRICTION DAMPINGINTERNAL FRICTION DAMPING(Ground)(Ground)
RADIATION DAMPINGRADIATION DAMPING
Stick-SlipBehavior of
Contact Surfaces
Soil-StructureInteraction
Amplitude DependencyAmplitude Dependency
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
80/156
0.01
0.02
0.03
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Acceleration Amplitude (10-2
m/sec2)
Dampin
gRatio
1
0.64
0.645
0.65
0.655
0.66
0.665
NaturalFre
quency
f1(Hz)
Damping RatioDamping Ratio 11
NaturalNatural
FrequencyFrequencyff11
An Observatory Building (An Observatory Building (HH=99m)=99m)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
81/156
StickStick--slip Modelslip Model
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
82/156
Increase of amplitudeIncrease of amplitude
Increase of number of slipping jointsIncrease of number of slipping joints Increase of friction dampingIncrease of friction damping& Decrease of stiffness& Decrease of stiffnessSum of a lot of frictional damping effectsSum of a lot of frictional damping effects Viscous dampingViscous damping
++ ++ ++ ==
for Damping in Buildingsfor Damping in Buildings
FullFull--scale Fundamental Naturalscale Fundamental NaturalPeriods & Their Design ValuesPeriods & Their Design Values
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
83/156
Design Natural Period (s)
0
1
2
34
5
6
7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Td
MeasuredNatural
Period
(s)
Tm Td, r0.80 0.94Tm
(Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
20%20%
Proposed Damping PredictorProposed Damping Predictorin AIJ 2000in AIJ 2000
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
84/156
RCRC buildings :buildings :
11 = 0.0143= 0.0143ff11 + 470+ 470((xxHH//HH)) 0.00180.0018xxHH//H
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
85/156
RCRC buildings :buildings :
11 = 0.93/= 0.93/HH + 470+ 470((xxHH//HH)) 0.00180.0018xxHH//H
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
86/156
(Tamura et al., 2000)(Tamura et al., 2000)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1F
ull-ScaleD
ampingRatio
1
0.88r
Predicted Damping Ratio by Eq.(8)Proposed Predictor
(Tamura 2000)
RC BuildingsRC Buildings
Design Damping Ratios (Steel)(Tamura et al., 2000)(Tamura et al., 2000)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
87/156
Habitabilit Safet
Damping Ratio
1 (%)
Damping Ratio
1 (%)
HeightH (m)
Natural
Frequencyf1(Hz)
Rec. Standard
Natural
Frequencyf1(Hz)
Rec. Standard30 1.7 1.8 2.5 1.4 2 340 1.3 1.5 2 1.0 1.8 2.550 1.0 1 1.5 0.83 1.5 2
60 0.83 1 1.5 0.69 1.5 270 0.71 0.7 1 0.60 1.5 280 0.63 0.7 1 0.52 1 1.590 0.56 0.7 1 0.46 1 1.5100 0.50 0.7 1 0.42 1 1.5
150 0.33 0.7 1 0.28 1 1.5200 0.25 0.7 1 0.21 1 1.5
"Rec." : "Recommended" values.
f1= 10.020H(Habitability), f1= 10.024H(Safety)
Safety : Elastic Range
Design Damping Ratios (RC)(Tamura et al., 2000)(Tamura et al., 2000)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
88/156
Habitabilit Safet
Damping Ratio
1 (%)
Damping Ratio
1 (%)
Height
H (m)
Natural
Frequency
f1(Hz) Rec. Standard
Natural
Frequency
f1 (Hz) Rec. Standard
30 2.2 2.5 3 1.9 3 3.540 1.7 1.5 2 1.4 2 2.5
50 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.1 2 2.5
60 1.1 1.2 1.5 0.93 1.5 2
70 0.95 0.8 1 0.79 1.5 2
80 0.83 0.8 1 0.69 1.2 1.5
90 0.74 0.8 1 0.62 1.2 1.5
100 0.67 0.8 1 0.56 1.2 1.5
"Rec." : "Recommended" values.
f1= 10.015H(Habitability), f1= 10.018H(Safety)
Safety : Elastic Range
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
89/156
Suppression of WindSuppression of Wind--InducedInduced
R (B ff ti )R (B ff ti )
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
90/156
Response (Buffeting)Response (Buffeting) MMSS++ CCSSYY++KKSSYY
= (1/2)= (1/2)UU22
BB22
CCWW(t)(t) ++FFCC (t)(t)MMSS : Mass,: Mass, CCSS : Damping Factor,: Damping Factor,KKSS : Stiffness,: Stiffness,YY : Displacement,: Displacement, UU : Mean Wind Speed,: Mean Wind Speed, : Air: Air--density,density,CCWW((tt) : Aerodynamic Coefficient,) : Aerodynamic Coefficient, FFCC((tt) : Control Force) : Control Force
**+2+2SS YY** ++ YY**==nn**UU**22 CCWW(t(t
**)) ++FFCC**(t(t**))
SS : Damping Ratio,: Damping Ratio, YY** = Y= Y/B/B : Reduced Displacement,: Reduced Displacement,UU** == U/U/SSBB : Reduced Velocity,: Reduced Velocity, nn** == BB 33//22MMSS : Mass Ratio,: Mass Ratio,SS = 2= 2ffSS : Building: Buildings Natural Circular Frequency,s Natural Circular Frequency,FFCC*
*((tt*
*) : Non) : Non--dimensional Control Force for Unit Massdimensional Control Force for Unit Mass
Suppression ofWind-Induced Responses
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
91/156
Aerodynamic MeansAerodynamic Means-- change in sectional shapechange in sectional shape-- shear layer controlshear layer control
Structural DesignStructural Design
-- increase in massincrease in mass-- increase in stiffnessincrease in stiffness
Auxiliary Damping DevicesAuxiliary Damping Devices
-- increase in dampingincrease in damping-- vibration controlvibration control
Aerodynamic DesignAerodynamic Design
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
92/156
Wind RosesWind Roses
Sapporo TokyoSapporo Tokyo
Aerodynamic DesignAerodynamic Design
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
93/156
Wind Direction (Building Orientation)Wind Direction (Building Orientation)
BB = 20m,= 20m, DD = 40m,= 40m, HH = 40m= 40m
Max. AccelerationMax. Acceleration
Max. DisplacementMax. Displacement
63%63% 100%100%
50%50% 100%100%
Periodic vortices shed from a squarePeriodic vortices shed from a square
prismprism (Streak Lines CFD)(Streak Lines CFD)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
94/156
prismprism (Streak Lines, CFD)(Streak Lines, CFD)
K. Shimada
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
95/156
From Compulsory to Free StyleFrom Compulsory to Free Style
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
96/156
From Compulsory to Free StyleFrom Compulsory to Free StyleCorner cutChamfered
Ellipse
1:2CircleRectangle
1:2Square Corner cutChamfered
Ellipse
1:2CircleRectangle
1:2Square
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
97/156
DrumInverse
4-Tapered
HelicalCircle +
Ellipse 180o
Setback
HelicalEllipse180o
4-Tapered
Corner
HelicalRectangle
180o
2-Tapered
HelicalSquare 360o
Tapered
HelicalSquare 270o
HelicalSquare 180o
HelicalSquare 90o
Helical
Tilted
SnakingTilted
Base
DrumInverse
4-Tapered
HelicalCircle +
Ellipse 180o
Setback
HelicalEllipse180o
4-Tapered
Corner
HelicalRectangle
180o
2-Tapered
HelicalSquare 360o
Tapered
HelicalSquare 270o
HelicalSquare 180o
HelicalSquare 90o
Helical
Tilted
SnakingTilted
Base
Void
Void
Void
Void
Void
Void
Void
3-CircleOblique
Void
Oblique
Void
Setback
Helical
Oblique
Void
Setback
Corner cut
Cross Void
Corner cut Helical Tapered
Corner cut
Helical
Composite
Void
Cross VoidCross Void 3-CircleOblique
Void
Oblique
Void
Setback
Helical
Oblique
Void
Setback
Corner cut
Cross Void
Corner cut Helical Tapered
Corner cut
Helical
Composite
Void
Cross VoidCross Void
HFFB ModelHFFB Model
SMPMS Pressure Model
Power Spectrum ofPower Spectrum of
Crosswind Base MomentCrosswind Base Moment
VV VV
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
98/156
Crosswind Base MomentVV500y500yVV1y1y
fB/UH
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Square
Corner cutTaperedSetback
90oHelical
180oHelical
fSML
/(qHB
H2)2
4-Tapered
fSML
(f)/
(qH
BH2)2
Corner CutCorner Cut
SquareSquare
4 Tapered4 Tapered
SetbackSetback
180180HelicalHelical
9090HelicalHelical
700 500500--yearyear--rec. for Structural Safetyrec. for Structural Safety
)
WindWind--induced Responsesinduced Responses
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
99/156
0
100200
300
400
500
600
(cm/s
2)
500500 yearyear rec. for Structural Safetyrec. for Structural Safety
PeakAcc.
(cm/s2)
0
4
8
12
16
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(cm/s
2)
PeakAcc.(c
m/s2) 11--yearyear--rec. for Habitabilityrec. for Habitability
Sq
uare
Chamfered
Corne
rcut
T
ilted
four-Tap
ered
Set
back
two-Tap
ered
Helical
Void
InversefourTap
ered
H
elical
H
elical
Corner
Cut
Corner
Cut
Strouhal Peaks ofStrouhal Peaks ofLocal Crosswind ForcesLocal Crosswind Forces
ee
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
100/156
180
180ooHelic
al
Helic
al
00
0.10.10.20.2
0.30.3
0.40.40.50.5
0.60.6
0.70.7
0.80.8
0.90.9
11
00 0.050.05 0.10.1 0.150.15 0.20.2 0.250.25
ffpeakpeakB/UB/UHH
Square
Square
S
etback
S
etback
9090ooHelical
Helical
z /Hz /H
Aerodynamic DesignAerodynamic Design
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
101/156
Vertical variationVertical variation
of sectional sha eof sectional sha e
Aerodynamic DesignAerodynamic Design
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
102/156
Vertical variationVertical variationof sectional shapeof sectional shape
Suppression of Wake Buffeting bySuppression of Wake Buffeting byRotorsRotors
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
103/156
Suppression of Wake Buffeting bySuppression of Wake Buffeting byRotorsRotors
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
104/156
Rotors are not rotating.Rotors are not rotating.
Vortex SheddingVortex Shedding
FrequencyFrequency
SVSVffvv ==
DD
Suppression of Wake Buffeting bySuppression of Wake Buffeting byRotorsRotors
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
105/156
Rotors are rotating.Rotors are rotating.
Vortex SheddingVortex SheddingFrequencyFrequency
SVSVffvv ==
DD
StructuralStructural DesignDesign
Increasing StiffnessIncreasing Stiffness KKSS
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
106/156
Increasing StiffnessIncreasing StiffnessKKSS-- natural frequencynatural frequencyffSS increasesincreases
nonnon--dimensional wind speeddimensional wind speed U*U* decreasesdecreases-- member stress reducesmember stress reduces Increasing MassIncreasing MassMMSS-- air/building mass ratioair/building mass ration*n* decreasesdecreases
-- natural frequencynatural frequencyffSS decreasesdecreases nonnon--dimensional wind speeddimensional wind speed U*U* increasesincreases no change inno change inn*U*n*U*22
*+2S Y* + Y* =n*U*2 CW(t*) +FC*(t*)
StructuralStructural DesignDesign
Increasing StiffnessIncreasing Stiffness KKSS
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
107/156
Increasing StiffnessIncreasing StiffnessKKSS-- natural frequencynatural frequencyffSS increasesincreases
nonnon--dimensional wind speeddimensional wind speed U*U* decreasesdecreases-- member stress reducesmember stress reduces Increasing MassIncreasing MassMMSS-- air/building mass ratioair/building mass ration*n* decreasesdecreases
-- natural frequencynatural frequencyffSS decreasesdecreases nonnon--dimensional wind speeddimensional wind speed U*U* increasesincreases no change inno change inn*U*n*U*22
*+2S Y* + Y* =n*U*2 CW(t*) +FC*(t*)
ScrutonScrutonNu
mberNumberSSCC forfor
Aerodynam
ic
Aerodynam
icInstibilityInstibility
SSCCMMSS
100
Increase of StiffnessIncrease of StiffnessKKSS
Increase of Natural Frequency fIncrease of Natural Frequency f
11
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
108/156
0.01 0.1 1 (Hz)
Natural Frequencyf1
100
1
0.1
Pea
kAccele
ration(cm
/s2)
Pea
kDispla
cement(cm)
: Damping Ratio: Damping Ratio
Increase of Natural Frequency f
ISO10137OfficesResidences
100
Increase of StiffnessIncrease of StiffnessKKSS
Increase of Natural Frequency fIncrease of Natural Frequency f
11
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
109/156
0.01 0.1 1 (Hz)
Natural Frequencyf1
100
1
0.1
Pea
kAccele
ration(cm
/s2)
Pea
kDispla
cement(cm)
ISO10137OfficesResidences
AccelerationAcceleration =1%AccelerationAcceleration =5%
DisplacementDisplacement =1%
Building ResponseBuilding Response
: Damping Ratio: Damping Ratio
Increase in Damping
Increase of Natural Frequency f
Steel Buildings andSteel Buildings andReinforced Concrete BuildingsReinforced Concrete Buildings
SteelSteel Reinforced ConcreteReinforced Concrete
f 1 1 2
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
110/156
ff11 11 :: 1.21.211 1 :1 : 1.31.3SS 11 :: 2.02.0AAMAXMAX,1yr,1yr 11 : 0.36: 0.36XXMAXMAX,100yr,100yr 11 : 0.32: 0.32 ff11 : Natural Frequency (1st mode): Natural Frequency (1st mode)11 : Damping Ratio (1st mode): Damping Ratio (1st mode) SS : Building Mass per Unit Volume: Building Mass per Unit Volume AAMAXMAX,1yr,1yr : Maximum Wind: Maximum Wind--Induced Acceleration (1yr rec.)Induced Acceleration (1yr rec.)
XXMAXMAX,100yr,100yr : Maximum Wind: Maximum Wind--Induced Displacement (500yr rec.)Induced Displacement (500yr rec.)
Damping Devices
Passive Damping SystemsPassive Damping Systems Hysteretic DampersHysteretic Dampers
S l D L d DSt l D L d D
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
111/156
Steel Dampers, Lead Dampers,Steel Dampers, Lead Dampers,Friction Dampers,Friction Dampers, ViscoVisco--Elastic DampersElastic Dampers
Viscous Fluid DampersViscous Fluid DampersViscous Damping Walls, Oil DampersViscous Damping Walls, Oil Dampers
Mass DampersMass DampersTuned Mass Dampers, Tuned Liquid DampersTuned Mass Dampers, Tuned Liquid Dampers
Active Control SystemsActive Control Systems Mass DampersMass Dampers
Active Mass Dampers, Hybrid Mass DampersActive Mass Dampers, Hybrid Mass Dampers Gyro DampersGyro Dampers
Active Gyro StabilizerActive Gyro Stabilizer
NonNon--Resonant SystemsResonant SystemsActive Variable StiffnessActive Variable Stiffness OthersOthers
SemiSemi--active Oil Damper, Activeactive Oil Damper, Active--damping Bridgedamping Bridge
Uncertainty in Structural DampingUncertainty in Structural Damping
C O VC O V 70% (H ill d 1974)70% (H ill d 1974)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
112/156
C.O.VC.O.V 70% (Havilland, 1974)70% (Havilland, 1974)SS = 2 %= 2 % 0.6% ~ 3.4%0.6% ~ 3.4% (5.7 times difference)(5.7 times difference) 2.4 times2.4 times difference of winddifference of wind--
induced accelerationinduced acceleration
If a certain damping (e.g.If a certain damping (e.g. addadd = 4 %)= 4 %) is addedis addedartificially:artificially: == SS ++ addadd 4.6% ~ 7.4%4.6% ~ 7.4% (1.6 times difference)(1.6 times difference) 1.3 times1.3 times difference of winddifference of wind--
induced accelerationinduced acceleration
improves structural design reliabilityimproves structural design reliability
TV Shizuoka Media CityTV Shizuoka Media City
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
113/156
TMD (Chiba Port Tower, 1986)TMD (Chiba Port Tower, 1986)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
114/156
HH= 125m= 125m
ffx1x1 = 0.44Hz= 0.44Hz
x1x1 = 0.51%= 0.51%ffy1y1 = 0.43Hz= 0.43Hz
y1y1 = 0.53%= 0.53%
TMD (Chiba Port Tower, 1986)TMD (Chiba Port Tower, 1986)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
115/156
mmDxDx
= 10t= 10t
mmDyDy = 15t= 15t
DD = 20%= 20%
TLD Vessels installed in YokohamaTLD Vessels installed in YokohamaMarine Tower (June 1987)Marine Tower (June 1987)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
116/156
Crosswind Accelerations of YokohamaCrosswind Accelerations of YokohamaMarine Tower With/WithoutMarine Tower With/Without TLDsTLDs
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
117/156
Crosswind r.m.s. Accelerations of YokohamaCrosswind r.m.s. Accelerations of YokohamaMarine Tower With/WithoutMarine Tower With/Without TLDsTLDs
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
118/156
ShinShin--Yokohama Prince HotelYokohama Prince HotelEmployingEmploying TLDsTLDs (March 1992)(March 1992)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
119/156
HH = 149m= 149m
TLD Vessels Installed on Roof ofTLD Vessels Installed on Roof ofShinShin--Yokohama Prince HotelYokohama Prince Hotel
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
120/156
Tokyo International Airport TowerTokyo International Airport TowerEmployingEmploying TLDsTLDs (1993)(1993)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
121/156
HH = 77.6m= 77.6m
TLD Vessels Installed in TokyoTLD Vessels Installed in TokyoInternational Airport TowerInternational Airport Tower
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
122/156
KyobashiKyobashi SeiwaSeiwa Building (1989)Building (1989)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
123/156
WindWind--induced Responses ofinduced Responses of KyobashiKyobashi SeiwaSeiwaBuilding With/Without AMD OperationBuilding With/Without AMD Operation
(Sakamoto et al.,1993)(Sakamoto et al.,1993)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
124/156
(Sakamoto et al.,1993)(Sakamoto et al.,1993)
Osaka ORC Symbol Tower Building (Osaka ORC Symbol Tower Building (HH=200m)=200m)Employing HMD and TMD [Employing HMD and TMD [MaebayashiMaebayashi, 1993], 1993]
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
125/156
WindWind--induced Responses With/Without HMDinduced Responses With/Without HMD
Operation(Osaka ORC Symbol Tower Building)Operation(Osaka ORC Symbol Tower Building)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
126/156
[[MaebayashiMaebayashi, 1993], 1993]
Active Gyro DamperActive Gyro Damper
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
127/156
Toshiba Elevator TowerToshiba Elevator Tower
Active Gyro DamperActive Gyro Damper
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
128/156
(by courtesy of Taisei Corporation)(by courtesy of Taisei Corporation)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
129/156
Frequency AdjustmentFrequency Adjustment
And Other IdeasAnd Other Ideas
FullFull--scale Fundamental Naturalscale Fundamental NaturalPeriods & Their Design ValuesPeriods & Their Design Values
(Steel Buildings)(Steel Buildings)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
130/156
Design Natural Period (s)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7T
d
MeasuredNatura
lPeriod
(s)
Tm
Td
, r0.80 0.94
Tm
( g )g
20%20%
Fundamental Natural Frequency ofFundamental Natural Frequency ofSloshing Motion of Water Inside aSloshing Motion of Water Inside a
Circular Cylindrical VesselCircular Cylindrical Vessel
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
131/156
TLCD with a Frequency AdjustableTLCD with a Frequency AdjustableSystemSystem
HotelHotel CosimaCosima
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
132/156
((TeramuraTeramura, 1995), 1995)
TLCD with a Frequency AdjustableTLCD with a Frequency AdjustableSystemSystem
HotelHotel CosimaCosima
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
133/156
((TeramuraTeramura, 1995), 1995)
Shinjuku Park Tower employing HMDShinjuku Park Tower employing HMD
HH=226.5m,=226.5m,MMSS=130,000=130,000101033kg (Kajima)kg (Kajima)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
134/156
Shinjuku Park Tower employingShinjuku Park Tower employingVV--shaped HMDshaped HMD
HH=226.5m,=226.5m,MMSS=130,000=130,000101033kg (Kajima)kg (Kajima)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
135/156
Tanida et al. (1993)Tanida et al. (1993)
MultipleMultiple--pendulum HMDpendulum HMDYokohama Landmark TowerYokohama Landmark Tower
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
136/156
MM
MM
LL
L /L / 33
Yamazaki et al., 1993Yamazaki et al., 1993
(170(170101033kg)kg)
Utilization of Existing MassUtilization of Existing Mass
Heat Storage TanksHeat Storage TanksL T C Bank of Japan:L T C Bank of Japan: 200200 101033 kgkg AMDAMD
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
137/156
L.T.C. Bank of Japan:L.T.C. Bank of Japan: 200200 101033 kgkg AMDAMD xx--,,yy--dirsdirs.. Ice Thermal Storage TanksIce Thermal Storage Tanks SendagayaSendagaya INTES:INTES: 3636 101033 kgkg 22 AMDAMD Crystal Tower:Crystal Tower: xx--dir.dir. 9090 101033 kgkg 44 TMDTMD
yy--dir.dir. 9090 101033 kgkg 22 Water Supply TanksWater Supply Tanks HotelHotel CosimaCosima:: 4949 101033 kgkg TTLLDD
Heliport DecksHeliport Decks HankyuHankyu ChayamachiChayamachi Building:Building:480480 101033 kgkg AMDAMD
LTC Bank of Japan employing AMDLTC Bank of Japan employing AMD
HH = 130m,= 130m,MMSS=39,800=39,800101033kgkg
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
138/156
Kitamura et al. (1995)Kitamura et al. (1995)
AMD utilizing 200AMD utilizing 200101033kg (kg (2 dirs.2 dirs.) Heat) HeatStorage TanksStorage Tanks
HH =130m,=130m,MMSS=39,800=39,800101033kgkg
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
139/156
Kitamura et al. (1995)Kitamura et al. (1995)
HankyuHankyu ChayamachiChayamachi BuildingBuildingEmploying AMDEmploying AMD
HH=160m,=160m,MMSS=14,000=14,000101033kgkg
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
140/156
HigashinoHigashino et al. (1993)et al. (1993)
AMD utilizing a Heliport DeckAMD utilizing a Heliport Deck
480480 101033kgkg
HankyuHankyu--ChayamachiChayamachi Bldg,Bldg,HH=160m=160m
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
141/156
48048010103kgkg
HigashinoHigashino et al. (1993)et al. (1993)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
142/156
Recent TrendsRecent Trends
Combinations of Four Different DevicesCombinations of Four Different Devices
TMDTMD (2: Habitability to(2: Habitability toWindWind--induced Vibrations)induced Vibrations)
Nippon TV Office (Nippon TV Office (HH= 192.8m)= 192.8m)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
143/156
19
2.8
m
19
2.8
m
UnbondedUnbondedBraceBraceUnbondedUnbonded
BraceBrace(64: Extreme(64: Extreme
Earthquakes)Earthquakes)
Link BeamLink Beam(312: Extreme(312: ExtremeEarthquakes)Earthquakes)
OilOilDamperDamper(32: Wind(32: Wind--inducedinduced
Vibrations, Weak,Vibrations, Weak,Medium & ExtremeMedium & ExtremeEarthquakes)Earthquakes)
AMD & Honeycomb Damper
AMDAMD
Kyodo News Service (Kyodo News Service (HH= 172.4m)= 172.4m)
(Habitability to Wind(Habitability to Wind--inducedinduced
Vibrations)Vibrations)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
144/156
HoneycombHoneycomb
DamperDamper(Extreme Earthquakes)(Extreme Earthquakes)
Unbonded Brace& Semi-active Oil Damper
RoppongiRoppongi Hills (Hills (HH= 238m)= 238m)
UnbondedUnbonded BraceBrace
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
145/156
SemiSemi--activeactiveOil DamperOil Damper
UnbondedUnbonded BraceBrace
SemiSemi--activeactiveOil DamperOil Damper(192: Wind(192: Wind--induced Vibrationinduced Vibration
& Extreme Earthquakes)& Extreme Earthquakes)
(356: Extreme Earthquakes))(356: Extreme Earthquakes))
UnbondedUnbonded BraceBrace
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
146/156
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
147/156
UnbondedUnbonded BracesBraces(Low(Low--yield Stress Steel)yield Stress Steel)
UnbondedUnbonded BracesBraces
Tower YTower Y
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
148/156
28402840UBsUBs
TheThe MarunouchiMarunouchi BuildingBuilding (2002)(2002)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
149/156
AntiAnti--seismic Shaftseismic Shaftin thein the MarunouchiMarunouchi BuildingBuilding (Inada et al., 2002)(Inada et al., 2002)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
150/156
AntiAnti--seismic Shaftseismic Shaftin thein the MarunouchiMarunouchi BuildingBuilding (Inada et al., 2002)(Inada et al., 2002)
AntiAnti--seismic shaftsseismic shaftsCentral pillarCentral pillar
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
151/156
LowLow--yieldyield--strengthstrengthSteelSteel
AntiAnti--seismic shaftseismic shaft (close(close--up view)up view)
AntiAnti--seismic Shaftseismic Shaftin thein the MarunouchiMarunouchi BuildingBuilding
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
152/156
LowLow--yield Strength Steelyield Strength Steel
Vinod J.Vinod J. ModiModiInventor of Tuned Liquid DamperInventor of Tuned Liquid Damper
((NutationNutation Damper 1980)Damper 1980)
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
153/156
((NutationNutation Damper, 1980)Damper, 1980)
Vinod J. Modi (1929Vinod J. Modi (1929--2003)2003)
Vinod J. Modi often quotedVinod J. Modi often quoted
the following sentences:the following sentences:No equation will ever be able to reveal theNo equation will ever be able to reveal thesecret innocence of a childsecret innocence of a childs smile thes smile the
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
154/156
secret innocence of a childsecret innocence of a childs smile, thes smile, theelegant effortless glide of a seagull, or theelegant effortless glide of a seagull, or thegentle murmuring of thegentle murmuring of the hinokihinoki cypress atcypress atdawn.dawn.
Knowledge is but a small islandKnowledge is but a small islandsurrounded by a vast ocean of ignorance.surrounded by a vast ocean of ignorance.
No matter how far we progress, we willNo matter how far we progress, we willalways remain at the shores of thatalways remain at the shores of thatuncharted world.uncharted world.
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
155/156
Who is this !Who is this !
Thank You !Thank You !
-
8/13/2019 Prof.tamura July19 APSS2010 Wind-universitatea Tokyo
156/156