professor scott prasser public policy institute – australian catholic university

21
© Professor Scott Prasser Presentation – ASPG Conference Oversight 4 October - Perth There’s a touch too much integrity – a time to wind back rather than wind up? Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Upload: aram

Post on 11-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation – ASPG Conference Oversight 4 October - Perth There’s a touch too much integrity – a time to wind back rather than wind up?. Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University. So what is it?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

© Professor Scott Prasser

Presentation – ASPG ConferenceOversight

4 October - Perth

There’s a touch too much integrity – a time to wind back rather than wind up?

Professor Scott PrasserPublic Policy Institute – Australian Catholic

University

Page 2: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

So what is it?

“Integrity – wholeness, entirety, soundness, uprightness, honesty”

Oxford Dictionary

Page 3: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Integrity means

• Honesty

• Due process

• Truth

• Veracity

• Non-manipulation

Page 4: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Corruption – not a public act!

“Corruption is one of those acts that is characteristically committed between consenting adults in private.” (Sturgess)

Outside expected norms

Page 5: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Govt corruption–incompetence

Page 6: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Why do we want it?• Underpins democratic governance

– inclusion– fairness/equity– government acts in ‘public interest’

• Essential for ‘good’ governance– bulwark against corruption– reduces waste– ensures ‘merit’– stop ‘rent seeking’

• Organisations better than individuals in it!

Page 7: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Mapping the territory

• NSW: Independent Commission Against Corruption; Police Integrity Commission, Police Integrity Commission Inspector and Crime Commission

• QLD: Criminal Justice Commission now Crime and Misconduct Commission

• WA: Corruption and Crime Commission• TAS: Integrity Commission • VIC: Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commission • SA: Independent Commissioner Against Corruption • CMTH: Australian Commission for Law Enforcement

Integrity; Australian Crime Commission

Page 8: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

QLD CWTH NSW VIC WA SA TAS NT ACT

Independent public sector anti-corruption body such as the CMC.

✓ × ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × * × ×

Police anti-corruption body ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ × × * × ✓

Integrity Commissioner ✓ × × × × × × × ×

Register of Lobbyists ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ × × * × ×

Lobbyist Code ✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ × × * × ×

Political donation disclosure (threshold)

✓($1000) ✓($10000)Note 3

✓($1000) × ✓($1500) × × ✓($1500) ✓($1000)

Whistleblower Protection legislation

✓ × ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Recent reforms to Freedom of Information Laws

✓ ✓ ✓ × × × × * × × *

Ombudsman ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Public Service Code of Conduct/Ethics

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Stand-alone Ministerial Code of Conduct/Ethics

✓ ✓ ✓ × ✓ ✓ ✓ ×

Restrictions on post separation employment

✓ ✓ × × × ✓ ×

× ×N

Ban on direct holding of shares by Ministers and parliamentary Secretaries

✓ ✓ × × ✓Note 9

✓Note 9 × × ×

Register of Members’ Interests ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Table 1: Australia’s Integrity Framework

Page 9: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

In addition – in each policy area

• Host of integrity, review, oversight agencies

• But:- Slow- Narrow - Captured

Page 10: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Issues: the Goldilocks tests

• Just right – some minor ‘tweaking’

• Not enough – need more – National Integrity System (NIS)

• Integrity too focussed on ‘wrongdoing’ – not on other public policy decisions

• Too much – wind it back

Page 11: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

NIS • Ethical principles as a basic guideline • Clear laws, rules and standards that are openly enunciated • Education about rules and principles for public servants & MPs• Advice mechanisms on ethical issues as a proactive measure• Protection of whistleblowers • Transparency both interests, decisions and processes• Enforcement as a deterrent by agencies with powers and penalties • Strong institutions of government - ind judiciary, public service not

politicised and parliament not subordinated executive • Leadership example in personal behaviour/running of government• Political culture supports integrity, ethical behaviour and democratic

practices

Page 12: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

What’s driving demands for NIS?

• Limits of one off public inquiries

• Limits of existing new integrity bodies

• Continuing politicisation of the public service

• Lobbying scandals

• Continuing police problems

• NSW scandals – 8 minsters/6 councils/Obeids

• Problems with police integrity bodies eg NSW

• Policy/institutional fashion

Page 13: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Responses to integrity concerns

Page 14: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

What integrity rules cannot do

• End duplicitous behaviour

• Cannot force ‘truth’ in political argument– eg fact checkers on deficits ignored

• Ensure lack of self interest

• Replace societal norms

• Be disconnected from the political system in which operates

Page 15: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Some concerns

• Excessive regulation

• Focus on minutiae at expense of more important policy issues

• Honest officials do not need codes of conduct – dishonest ones will always sign

• Costs and benefits – why should integrity processes be exempt from this analysis– eg just what has the CMC delivered?

Page 16: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Some drivers?

• Over-reaction to minor misdemeanors

• Agenda set by media wanting instant actions/solutions

• Inflation of expectations

• Expansion of law, rights, and notions of recompense

Page 17: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Some concerns

• Excessive regulation

• Focus on minutiae

• Honest officials do not need codes of conduct – dishonest ones sign up

• Costs and benefits – why should integrity processes be exempt from this analysis

Page 18: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

The co-ordination issue

“Findings by one integrity body have been dismissed or not upheld by another due to different evidentiary requirements or different interpretations of what constitutes misconduct and corruption. The result is public confusion and uncertainty.” (Proust 2010, p ix)

Page 19: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Some questions

• How big is the corruption problem?

• How often are integrity mechanisms and officers actually used?

• Where are the gaps in existing mechanisms?:– what cannot be reported?– what can the media not pursue?– where do existing law enforcement

agencies not have enough power?

• Where is the misallocation of $$$$?

• Turning the system upside down

Page 20: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Democracy, influence and sub-optimal expenditure

  “...we should not forget ... that the processes of democratic and representative systems ... are based on compromise, on securing and using influence, on obtaining advantages for constituents ... and for MPs and ministers ... some level of compromised use of influence ... is a necessary and unexceptional feature of our public life.”Professor Paul Finn

 

... we must be careful ... to differentiate real corruption from activities which are regarded as corrupt by many ... and which may produce sub-optimal expenditure patterns, but which are not patently corrupt. Hogwood and Peters

Page 21: Professor Scott Prasser Public Policy Institute – Australian Catholic University

Total justice?

“There has developed in this country … a general expectation of justice… and a general expectation of recompense for injuries and loss for… ‘total justice’”

Lawrence Friedman Total Justice