professional learning community 2019-2020
TRANSCRIPT
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Our Mission: To provide the highest quality education, where learning, leadership, service, and research-based practices ensure equitable and meaningful opportunities for all students.
Our Goal: 100% of collaborative teams will score at developing or higher on the Professional Learning Communities at Work Continuum: Building a Collaborative Culture through High Performing Teams.
2019-2020 Collective Timeline
Date Action 9/9/2019 PD East/West: EL
PMSA: TBD By 9/16/2019 All teams take the Professional Learning Communities at Work Continuum:
Building a Collaborative Culture through High Performing Teams to establish baseline data.
Each Week Team leader posts agenda and notes in team folder. By 9/16/2019 All teams establish norms and one or more SMART goals for the school
year. By 10/14/2019 Teams collaboratively identify at least one essential standard per semester
for the team to track, assess, and monitor.
Team leaders submit request for PD hours for quarter one. By 11/04/2019 Teams develop and administer at least one common formative assessment.
Teams will collaboratively analyze results and develop a plan of action that addresses the following questions:
• What do we do for the students who didn’t learn it?• What do we do next for students who did master the learning?
Team leaders post CFA analysis results and plan in team folder. 11/18/2019 PD East/West EL:
PMSA: TBD
By 12/18/2019 Team leaders submit request for PD hours for quarter two. 1/13/2020 PD: EL online module By 3/10/2020 Teams develop and administer at least one common formative assessment.
Teams will collaboratively analyze results and develop a plan of action that
1
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
addresses the following questions: • What do we do for the students who didn’t learn it?• What do we do next for students who did master the learning?
Team leaders post CFA analysis results and plan in team folder. By 3/17/2020 Team leaders submit request for PD hours for quarter three. 4/14/2020 PD: East/West EL
PMSA: TBD By 5/5/2020 All teams take the Professional Learning Communities at Work Continuum:
Building a Collaborative Culture through High Performing Teams to establish end of year data.
By 5/12/2020 Team leaders submit request for PD hours for quarter four. By 5/19/2020 All teams celebrate successes and identify areas for improvement.
Required Professional Learning
In support of improving instruction to students with English Language needs and in alignment with our Technical Assistance Plan, the following professional learning will take place during team time on 4 Mondays through-out the year. These sessions will occur in content area departments facilitated by EL/Bilingual staff at Proviso East and Proviso West.
1. EL PD: 9/9/20192. EL PD: 11/18/20193. EL PD 1/13/20204. EL PD 4/6/2020
2
146 | REPRoDuCibLE
Learning by Doing © 2006, 2010 Solution Tree Press • solution-tree comVisit go.solution-tree.com/PLCbooks to download this page
The
Pro
fess
iona
l Le
arni
ng C
om
mun
itie
s at
Wo
rk™
Co
nti
nuum
: B
uild
ing
a C
olla
bo
rati
ve C
ultu
re T
hro
ugh
Hig
h-P
erfo
rmin
g Te
am
s
DIR
ECTI
ON
S:In
divi
dual
ly,s
ilent
ly,a
ndh
ones
tlya
sses
sth
ecu
rren
tre
alit
yof
you
rsc
hool
’sim
plem
enta
tion
ofe
ach
indi
cato
rlis
ted
int
hele
ftc
olum
n.C
onsi
der
wha
tev
iden
ceo
ran
ecdo
tes
supp
ort
your
ass
essm
ent.
Thi
sfo
rmm
aya
lso
beu
sed
to
asse
ssd
istr
ict
ort
eam
impl
emen
tatio
n.
We
are
com
mit
ted
tow
orki
ngt
oget
her
toa
chie
veo
urc
olle
ctiv
epu
rpos
eof
lear
ning
for
alls
tud
ents
.We
cult
ivat
ea
colla
bor
ativ
ecu
ltur
eth
roug
hth
ed
evel
opm
ent
ofh
igh-
per
form
ing
team
s.
Ind
icat
orP
re-I
niti
atin
gIn
itia
ting
Imple
men
ting
Dev
elop
ing
Sust
aini
ng
We
are
orga
nize
din
to
colla
bor
ativ
e te
ams
in
whi
chm
emb
ers
wor
kin
terd
epen
den
tly
to
achi
eve
com
mon
goa
ls
that
dir
ectl
y im
pac
t st
uden
tac
hiev
emen
t.
Stru
ctur
esh
ave
bee
n p
utin
pla
cet
oen
sure
:
1.C
olla
bor
atio
nis
em
bed
ded
inou
rro
utin
ew
ork
pra
ctic
e.
2. W
ear
ep
rovi
ded
wit
hti
me
toco
llab
orat
e.
3. W
ear
e cl
ear
ont
hecr
itic
alq
uest
ions
that
sho
uld
dri
veou
rco
llab
orat
ion.
4. O
urc
olla
bor
ativ
ew
ork
ism
onit
ored
and
sup
por
ted.
Teac
hers
wor
k in
isol
atio
nw
ith
littl
e aw
aren
ess
oft
hes
trat
egie
s,
met
hod
s,o
rm
ater
ials
tha
tco
lleag
ues
use
int
each
ing
the
sam
eco
urse
or
gra
de
leve
l. Th
ere
isn
op
lan
inp
lace
to
ass
ign
staf
fm
emb
ers
into
te
ams
ort
op
rovi
de
them
w
ith
tim
eto
co
llab
orat
e.
Teac
hers
are
en
cour
aged
but
no
tre
qui
red
to
wor
kto
geth
er
colla
bor
ativ
ely.
So
me
staf
fmay
el
ect
tow
ork
wit
hco
lleag
ues
ont
opic
s of
m
utua
lint
eres
t.
Staf
fmem
ber
sar
eco
ngen
ial
but
are
not
co
-lab
orin
gin
an
effo
rtt
oim
pro
ves
tud
ent
achi
evem
ent.
Teac
hers
hav
eb
een
assi
gned
to
col
lab
orat
ive
team
san
dha
veb
een
pro
vid
edt
ime
for
colla
bor
atio
nd
urin
g th
e re
gula
r co
ntra
ctua
ld
ay. T
eam
s m
ayb
eun
clea
rre
gard
ing
how
th
eys
houl
d us
e th
eco
llab
orat
ive
tim
es.T
opic
sof
ten
focu
son
m
atte
rsu
nrel
ated
to
tea
chin
gan
dle
arni
ng.S
ome
teac
hers
bel
ieve
th
ete
amm
eeti
ng
isn
ota
pro
duc
tive
us
eof
the
irt
ime.
Teac
hers
hav
eb
een
assi
gned
to
col
lab
orat
ive
team
san
dha
veb
een
prov
ided
tim
efo
rco
llab
orat
ion
ona
wee
kly
basi
sdu
ring
the
reg
ular
con
trac
tual
da
y.G
uid
elin
es,p
roto
cols
,an
dpr
oces
ses
have
bee
nes
tabl
ishe
din
an
effo
rtt
ohe
lpt
eam
s us
eco
llab
orat
ive
tim
eto
focu
s on
top
ics
that
w
illh
ave
ap
osit
ive
imp
act
on
stud
ent
achi
evem
ent.
Tea
m
lead
ers
are
help
ing
lead
the
co
llab
orat
ive
proc
ess,
and
the
w
ork
oft
eam
sis
mon
itor
ed
clos
ely
soa
ssis
tanc
eca
nb
epr
ovid
edw
hen
ate
am
stru
ggle
s.T
eam
s ar
ew
orki
ng
inte
rdep
end
entl
yto
ach
ieve
go
als
spec
ifica
llyr
elat
ed
toh
ighe
rle
vels
ofs
tud
ent
achi
evem
ent
and
are
focu
sing
th
eir
effo
rts
ond
isco
veri
ng
bet
ter
way
sto
ach
ieve
tho
se
goal
s.
The
colla
bor
ativ
ete
amp
roce
ssis
d
eep
lye
ngra
ined
int
hes
choo
l cul
ture
. St
affm
emb
ers
view
ita
sth
een
gine
th
atd
rive
s sc
hool
imp
rove
men
t.T
eam
s ar
ese
lf-d
irec
ted
and
very
ski
llful
in
advo
cacy
and
inq
uiry
. The
y co
nsis
tent
ly
focu
son
issu
est
hat
are
mos
tsi
gnifi
cant
in
imp
rovi
ngs
tud
ent
achi
evem
ent
and
set
spec
ific,
mea
sura
ble
goa
lst
om
onit
orim
pro
vem
ent.
The
col
lab
orat
ive
team
pro
cess
ser
ves
asa
pow
erfu
l fo
rmo
fjob
-em
bed
ded
pro
fess
iona
ld
evel
opm
ent
bec
ause
mem
ber
sar
ew
illin
gan
dea
ger
tole
arn
from
one
an
othe
r, id
enti
fyc
omm
onp
rob
lem
s,
enga
gein
act
ion
rese
arch
,mak
eev
iden
ceo
fstu
den
tle
arni
ngt
rans
par
ent
amon
gm
emb
ers
oft
het
eam
,and
mak
eju
dgm
ents
ab
out
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
diff
eren
tp
ract
ices
on
the
bas
is
oft
hat
evid
ence
. The
tea
mp
roce
ss
dir
ectl
yim
pac
tst
each
erp
ract
ice
int
he
clas
sroo
m, h
elp
ing
each
tea
cher
cla
rify
w
hat
tot
each
,how
to
asse
ss,a
ndh
ow
toim
pro
vein
stru
ctio
n.
Page
1 o
f 2
3
Learning by Doing © 2006, 2010 Solution Tree Press • solution-tree comVisit go.solution-tree.com/PLCbooks to download this page
REPRoDuCibLE | 147
Ind
icat
orP
re-I
niti
atin
gIn
itia
ting
Imple
men
ting
Dev
elop
ing
Sust
aini
ng
We
have
iden
tifie
dan
dho
nor
the
com
mit
men
tsw
eha
vem
ade
tot
he
mem
ber
sof
our
co
llab
orat
ive
team
sin
ord
ert
oen
hanc
e th
eef
fect
iven
ess
ofo
urt
eam
.The
se
art i
cula
ted
colle
ctiv
eco
mm
itm
ents
or
nor m
sha
vec
lari
fied
exp
ecta
tion
sof
how
ou
rte
amw
illo
per
ate,
an
dw
eus
eth
emt
oad
dre
ssp
r ob
lem
sth
atm
ayo
ccur
on
the
team
.
No
atte
ntio
nha
sb
een
pai
dto
est
ablis
hing
cl
earl
yar
ticu
late
dco
mm
itm
ents
th
a tc
lari
fyt
h e
exp
ecta
tion
sof
ho
wt
h et
e am
w
illf
unct
ion
and
how
eac
hm
emb
erw
ill
cont
rib
ute
toit
ssu
cces
s.N
orm
sd
oem
erge
fr o
m
each
gro
up
bas
edo
nth
eha
bit
sth
atc
ome
toc
hara
cter
ize
the
grou
p,
but
the
yar
ene
ithe
rex
plic
it
nor
the
resu
lt
ofa
tho
ught
ful
pro
cess
.Sev
eral
of
the
nor
ms
have
an
adve
rse
eff e
cto
nth
eef
fect
iven
ess
of
the
team
.
Team
sha
veb
een
enco
urag
edb
ysc
hool
or
dist
rict
le
ader
ship
to
crea
ten
orm
sth
atc
lari
fy
exp
ecta
tion
san
dco
mm
itm
ents
.R
ecom
men
ded
no
rms
for
team
sm
ayh
ave
bee
ncr
eate
dan
ddi
stri
bute
d.
Nor
ms
are
ofte
n st
ated
as
bel
iefs
ra
ther
tha
nco
mm
itm
ents
to
act
inc
erta
in
way
s.
Each
te a
mh
a s
bee
nre
qui
red
to
dev
elop
wri
tten
no
rms
that
cla
rify
ex
pec
tati
ons
and
com
mit
men
ts.
Man
yte
ams
have
vie
wed
thi
sas
at
ask
tob
eac
com
plis
hed.
Th
eyh
ave
wri
tten
th
eno
rms
and
sub
mit
ted
them
,b
utd
ono
tus
eth
ema
sp
art
of
the
colla
bor
ativ
ete
amp
roce
ss.
Team
sha
vee
stab
lishe
dth
eco
llect
ive
com
mit
men
ts
tha t
wi ll
gu i
de
thei
rw
o rk,
an
dm
emb
ers
have
agr
eed
toh
onor
the
com
mit
men
ts.
The
com
mit
men
tsa
re
sta t
edin
te r
ms
ofs
pec
ific
beh
avio
rst
hat
mem
ber
sw
ill
dem
onst
rate
.The
tea
mb
egin
san
den
ds
each
mee
ting
wit
ha
revi
ewo
fthe
com
mit
men
ts
tor
emin
dea
cho
ther
of
the
agre
emen
tst
hey
have
m
ade
abou
tho
wt
hey
will
w
ork
toge
ther
.The
yas
sess
th
eef
fect
iven
ess
oft
he
com
mit
men
tsp
erio
dic
ally
an
dm
ake
revi
sion
sw
hen
they
fe
elt
hat
will
hel
pth
ete
am
bec
ome
mor
eef
fect
ive.
Team
mem
ber
sho
nor
the
colle
ctiv
eco
mm
itm
ents
the
yha
vem
ade
too
ne
anot
her
rega
rdin
g ho
wt
het
eam
will
op
erat
ean
dth
ere
spon
sib
ility
ofe
ach
mem
ber
to
the
team
.The
com
mit
men
ts
have
bee
nin
stru
men
tali
ncr
eati
ng
ana
tmos
phe
reo
ftru
sta
ndm
utua
lre
spec
t.T
hey
have
hel
ped
mem
ber
sw
ork
inte
rdep
end
entl
yto
ach
ieve
co
mm
ong
oals
bec
ause
mem
ber
sb
elie
vet
hey
can
rely
up
ono
ne
anot
her.
The
com
mit
men
tsfa
cilit
ate
the
team
’sc
olle
ctiv
ein
qui
rya
ndh
elp
peo
ple
exp
lore
the
ira
ssum
ptio
nsa
nd
pra
ctic
es.M
emb
ers
reco
gniz
eth
att
heir
co
llect
ive
com
mit
men
tsh
ave
not
only
he
lped
the
tea
mb
ecom
em
ore
effe
ctiv
e,
but
hav
eal
som
ade
the
colla
bor
ativ
eex
per
ienc
e m
ore
per
sona
llyr
ewar
din
g.
Vio
lati
ons
oft
hec
omm
itm
ents
are
ad
dre
ssed
. Mem
ber
s us
e th
ema
sth
e b
asis
for
cruc
ialc
onve
rsat
ions
and
ho
nest
dia
logu
e w
hen
ther
e is
con
cern
th
ato
neo
rm
ore
mem
ber
sar
eno
tfu
lfilli
ngc
omm
itm
ents
.
Page
2 o
f 2
4
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Collaborative Team Meeting Agenda
Team Name
Members
SMART Goal(s) Team Norms
Date:
Materials to bring to meeting:
Expected Outcomes:
Topic for Discussion Who? Estimated Time
Minutes
Opening: Review norms; Assign recorder to take and submit minutes, Assign time keeper, etc.
5 minutes
Next Meeting Ideas Group 5 minutes Create agenda for our next PLC
DuFour’s Questions that guide our work
1. What do we expect our students to learn?2. How will we know when they have learned it?3. What will we do for students who didn’t learn it?4. What will we do next for students who did?
Expectations for Agendas and Minutes:
Agendas: • should be posted at least a day in advance.• should include goals or expected outcomes.• should include specific topics for discussion with estimated times listed.• should include meeting norms agreed upon by team.• should use the format shown above.
Minutes: • should be typed in the minutes column of the agenda.• should be posted within 2 days.• should be read by all PLC participants.
5
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Norms and SMART Goals
All teams will establish norms and one or more SMART goals for the school year by September 16, 2019.
Why?
• Explicit team norms help to increase the emotional intelligence of the group by cultivating trust,a sense of group identity, and a belief in group efficacy (Druskat & Wolff, 2001).
• Inattention to establishing specific team norms is one of the major reasons teams fail(Blanchard, 2007)
• Collegial support and professional development in schools are unlikely to have any effect onimprovement of practice and performance if they are not connected to a coherent set of goalsthat give direction and meaning to learning and collegiality (Elmore, 2003, p 60).
Resources
Learning by Doing pages 71-74 (norms) & 89 – 103 (SMART goals)
Sample Norms template (attached)
Team SMART Goal-Setting Plan (attached)
Collaborative Continuum (attached)
6
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Collaborative Team Norms
Team Members: Date:_______________
Norms Light: (ex. How often we meet, start and stopping time, participation, paraphrasing when we want to ensure we understood the other perspectives, presuming positive intent, silence is considered disagreement, look for ways to celebrate the work, use technology only to support the process, follow written agendas, how differing opinions will be handled, etc.)
Norms Heavy: (ex: How soon before a unit will the common formative assessments be created? How soon after formative assessments are given are they to be graded? How many formatives will be co-graded to ensure inter-rater reliability? Will papers be traded to grade to remove bias? How long after the assessment will results be compared? How long after results are compared will a plan for intervention and extension be implemented? Will students be traded for a day or two for immediate intervention and extension days after CFA?)
When our norms are broken, we will:
We will notify administration when:
7
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Teams collaboratively identify essential standards for the team to track, assess, and monitor for the school year by October 14, 2019.
Why?
Collaborative study of essential standards promotes clarity among teachers. It also forms the basis for common formative assessments.
Resources
Learning by Doing pages 112-130
Essential Skill template (attached)
8
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Essential Skill for the Unit of Study – Worksheet Complete this form prior to starting a unit that has an essential skill in it.
Purpose: To determine as a collaborative team in the unit of study what is essential for students to know and be able to do, what is nice to know, and what the team is willing to sacrifice.
Questions to guide the team:
1. Does the essential have endurance? Do we really expect our student to retain the knowledgeand skills over time as opposed to merely learning it for a test?
2. Does it have leverage? Will proficiency in this standard help the student in other areas of thecurriculum and other academic disciplines?
3. Does it develop student readiness for the next level of learning? Is it essential for success inthe next unit, course, or grade level? - Adapted from DuFour, DuFour, Eaker, Many, & Mattos, Learning By Doing (2016), p. 116
Resources to help in making decisions:
• Standards • Unified district curriculum• Former lesson plans (what was taught vs. intended)• Unit books• State test samples • Item Analysis • A list of prerequisite skills that colleagues at the next course or grade level have established as essential for success at that level
Essential to know in this unit: (think: not more than 10 essentials per half year)
What do we want all students to know and be able to do?
Nice to know:
Willing to sacrifice:
Collaborative Team:____________________
Unit___________________
Date___________________
9
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Teams develop and administer at least one common formative assessment. Teams will collaboratively analyze results and develop a plan of action that addresses the following questions:
• What do we do for the students who didn’t learn it?• What do we do next for students who did master the learning?
Resources
Learning by Doing pages 133 – 160
Protocol for Team Analysis Prior to Teaching a Unit (attached)
Protocol for CFA Analysis and Planning (attached)
10
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Team CFA Analysis and Plan
Team Name
Date
The following analysis is based on our team’s CFA of the following essential learnings.
Areas of Challenge
1. According to the data, in what areas did students struggle across all or most classes?
2. What do we believe is the cause?
3. What strategies were used by teammates whose students performed well?
4. For students who need additional time and support to achieve at or above proficiency, whenwill we provide that time and how will we provide support?
Areas of Strength
According to the data, in what areas did students do well across all or most classes?
What do we believe is the reason for these results?
What is our plan to enrich, extend, and/or celebrate the learning for students who are highly proficient?
11
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Teacher CFA Analysis and Plan
Name
Date
The following analysis is based on our team’s CFA of the following essential learnings.
Areas of Challenge
1. According to the data, in what areas did my students struggle?
2. What strategies were used by teammates whose students performed well?
3. Which of these strategies will I try?
4. For students who need additional time and support to achieve at or above proficiency, whenwill I provide that time and how will we provide support?
Areas of Strength
According to the data, in what areas did my students do well?
What strategies will I share with colleagues?
What is my plan to enrich, extend, and/or celebrate the learning for students who are highly proficient?
12
Professional Learning Community 2019-2020
Request for PD Hours for Collaborative Team Work
School
Team Name
Team Leader
Quarter ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4
My collaborative team engaged in work focused on Dufour’s four questions for PLCs:
1. What do we expect our students to learn?2. How will we know when they have learned it?3. What will we do for students who didn’t learn it?4. What will we do next for students who have mastered the learning?
Check all that apply
☐ I have attached the attendance log and sign-in sheets.
☐ I have attached the evaluation forms.
The following documents are up to date and in the team folder.
☐ Norms
☐ SMART Goal(s)
☐ Agendas and notes for each meeting
☐ CFA Analysis and Plan (required for quarters 2 and 3)
______________________________________________ ________________________________ Team Lead Signature Date
______________________________________________ ________________________________ Administrator Signature Date
13