professional development for evaluators day 2: wednesday, september 26, 2012 leveraging performance...

64
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Upload: isaac-martin

Post on 18-Jan-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

StrengthsNeeds Improving student performance in math for students who enter my class performing below grade level Indicators/Elements: Teaching classrooms with diverse needs (especially meeting the needs of student with an IEP) Indicators/Elements: Family outreach and communication Indicators/Elements: Additional support for implementing the revised MA Curriculum framework Indicators/Elements: Improving communication with families for whom English is a second language Indicators/Elements: Strengthen leadership skills Indicators/Elements: Chris McCloud: Self-assessment against the rubric 3

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS

DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012

Leveraging Performance Management to Support

School Priorities

Page 2: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Today’s Agenda

Setting goals that are aligned and SMARTWriting Action Plans tied to goalsIdentifying evidence from artifacts and

observations Selective scripting

Rolling all evidence up into ratings

Page 3: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Strengths Needs

•Improving student performance in math for students who enter my class performing below grade levelIndicators/Elements:

•Teaching classrooms with diverse needs (especially meeting the needs of student with an IEP) Indicators/Elements:

•Family outreach and communication Indicators/Elements:

•Additional support for implementing the revised MA Curriculum framework Indicators/Elements:

•Improving communication with families for whom English is a second language Indicators/Elements:

•Strengthen leadership skills Indicators/Elements:

Chris McCloud: Self-assessment against the rubric

3

Page 4: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Getting to Goal Topics

Your school-level analysis should drive your student learning goals.

Your student learning goals should drive your professional practice goals.

Goal-setting is not done in a vacuum!

Needs Analysis Student Professional Learning Practice

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Page 5: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Setting Goals that are Aligned and SMART

Evaluators will: Identify what makes a goal SMART Practice skills to revise SMART goals Develop strategies to ensure alignment

between teacher and school goals Create sample goals for teachers Know what follows goal-setting

Page 6: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Understanding Goal Setting

Where do I need to grow

this year? Where do I

want my students to

grow this year?

Page 7: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Proposing and Setting Goals

Rationale for goal-settingBased on the educator’s self-assessment

At least: One goal for student learning, growth and achievement, and One goal for professional practice

Consider team, grade, or department goalsEducator proposes; supervisor determinesBEFORE educators set goals:

Measure practice against performance standards on rubric for the Professional Practice goal

Examine student data for the Student Learning goal

Page 8: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Attributes of a Strong Goal

SpecificMeasurable AttainableResults-FocusedTime-bound

Remember, the key to make sure the goal is written clearly enough so that both teacher and evaluator can determine the teacher’s degree of success in meeting the goal.

Page 9: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Sample Professional Practice Goal

With your table, consider this goal:7th grade math

In order to support my ELL students in averaging 80% on unit assessments, I will consistently identify and teach symbols, key terms and other math vocabulary, and use daily exit tickets that measure both vocabulary and conceptual understanding. I will measure my progress through student vocabulary notebooks and tracking exit ticket performance data twice a month from now until May 15.

Does this goal meet criteria for SMART?

Page 10: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Sample Professional Practice Goal

Specific: Focused on a sub-group of students (ELL), clear about which strategies will be taughtMeasurable: Can measure by analyzing student notebooks and exit ticketsAction-Oriented: The teacher will implement teaching strategies that are likely to improve student learning in the area he is measuringRealistic: The teacher wants / needs to teach these strategies already.Time-bound: Completion date for action (May 15) is included in the goal.

Page 11: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Activity: Re-writing Goals to be SMARTer

With your colleagues, review the worksheet of goals:Determine whether they are Student Learning (SL) or Professional Practice (PP) goalsAssess the strength of the goalDescribe how you would revise the goal

Page 12: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

A few more considerations…

Let’s revisit some of these goals and think about…

Page 13: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Consideration #1 – Set Goals on Leading vs. Lagging Indicators

Leading Indicator = an indicator that comes first, and causes, contributes to, or partially predicts outcome on a lagging indicator

Lagging indicator = an indicator that comes later, and is a result of or partially predictable based on a leading indicator

Choose a leading indicator your team can influence!

High school graduation

rate

Freshman GPAs

Quarterly grades

Daily attendance

Reading skills

Homework completion

Hours sleep per night

Page 14: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Consideration #2 – What data is your greatest leverage point?

Questions to ask:What data do we have?

Be pragmatic and use what you have whenever possible, but don’t sacrifice quality, reliability, or instructional relevance!

Where is the momentum in your system?

Work with it – “be the water, not the rock”

Where are kids’ skills? Focus your goal – and thus your

work – on your students’ limit to growth.

Yeah, yeah – but your

blood pressure is

in the healthy range!

Page 15: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Consideration #3 – Absolute Performance vs. Growth

Page 16: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Aligning Goals to School Priorities

Goal-setting should support your school’s goals

What are your school priorities?You will now write sample teacher goals to help

you further your school priorities.

Educator Evaluation

District Goals

School Goals

Professional Practice

Goal

Student LearningGoal

Page 17: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Sample Teacher Goals Aligned to School Priorities

1. Identify one or two priorities in your school. 2. Identify one of your school’s goals for student learning. 3. Based on one of your school’s goals for student learning (step #2), craft a

sample student learning goal that could be adaptable for many of your teachers. Use the template in the “Guidance for Writing Goals” worksheet.

4. Examine the Rubric of Effective Teaching and select one or two elements that support achievement of that student learning goal (in step # 3, above).

5. Using the goal template in “Guidance for Writing Goals,” construct a draft professional practice goal for one of those elements identified in step #4.Keep this goal flexible enough so that teachers can adapt it to their own content areas, classrooms, and students.

6. Share these goals with colleagues and be prepared to share with the group.

Page 18: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Aligning Goals to Support Whole-School Improvement

District priority 1. Professional Growth and Evaluation Goal Setting (IV-A-2)2. Using Data to Differentiate Instruction Adjustment to Practice (I-B-2) Access to Knowledge (II-D-3)1. Increasing Academic Rigor Well Structured Lessons (I-A-4)2. Engaging Fam., Com, & Partners Parent/Family Engagement (III-A-1) Two Way Communication (III-C-1)

School Priority    

School-wide Student Learning Goals

    

School-wide Professional Practice Goals  

Administrator Student Learning Goals

   

Administrator Professional Practice Goals

    

Grade Team Student Learning Goal

    

Grade Team Professional Practice Goal

 

 

Page 19: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Goal Proposal in EDFS

Propose one goal for student learning and one for professional practice

Evaluator will accept or return goals for further revision

Templates are included in the EDFS to support the goal-writing process

Page 20: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

EDFS: Student Learning Goal Proposal

Page 21: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

EDFS: Professional Practice Goal Proposal

Page 22: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

EDFS: Goal Approval

Page 23: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Action Plan Development

Page 24: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Action Plan Development

After the evaluator approves the educator’s goals, they will work with each other to develop an action plan that will detail which steps need to be taken to accomplish the educator’s goals.

Developing the plan together encourages conversations that build relationships and a shared understanding of high quality professional practice.

Page 25: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

EDFS: Action Steps and Plan Development

Each goal must have action steps to support educators’ completion of the goal

The action steps develop the plan into actionable steps including:

Actions; Supports or resources required; Timeline and frequency.

These steps will also be entered into the EDFS

Page 26: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Page 27: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Activity: Developing an Action Plan

Using the Action Plan Development Worksheet as a guide, work with a partner to develop an Action Plan to support a professional practice goal that one of you developed from the previous SMART goal activity.

After you have finished, talk with your partner about whether this action plan would make it highly likely that the accompanying student learning goal (from the previous SMART goal activity) could be achieved.

Page 28: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Evidence

Observation & Artifacts

Page 29: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Identifying Evidence from Artifacts and Observations

Evaluators will understand:• The difference between evidence and opinion• How to identify evidence from an observation

using selective scripting• What an artifact is, and how to identify evidence

in an artifact• Types of artifacts

Page 30: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

The 5-Step Cycle in Action

Every educator is an active participant in an evaluation

Process promotes collaboration and continuous learning

Continuous Learning

Page 31: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Collection of Evidence in EDFS

Both educators and evaluators are permitted to upload evidence to the EDFS

Evidence should be robust, allowing evaluators to assess across multiple rubric areas

Page 32: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Page 33: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Evidence collected on …

Progress on Ratings on OVERALL (2) Goals (4) Standards RATING

Page 34: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Evidence Collection Cycle

1. Evaluator collects and educator submits artifacts.

2. Evaluator makes fact-based statements about evidence of practice and progress toward goals contained in artifacts.

3. Evaluator aligns evidence statements with standards and indicators and goals.

4. Evaluator provides feedback to educator using language from the rubric.

5. Evaluator rates educator practice before the formative or summative evaluation.

34

Page 35: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Objective Evidence

EVIDENCE Prove or disprove Make plain or clear Indication or sign

OBJECTIVE Not influenced by personal feelings or prejudice Unbiased Something that can be known (as opposed to a “gut

feeling”)

As an evaluator you will – of course – use your professional judgment throughout the process but, by consistently using objective evidence and scoring it against the rubric, you will be both fair and rigorous

Page 36: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Levels of Evidence

INSUFFICIENT After lunch, I noticed that you were not teaching.

SUFFICIENT After lunch, I noted you sitting at your desk while students got

settled.

EXEMPLARY The required math block falls right after lunch. 15 minutes into

that block I noticed that you were sitting at your desk looking at your computer. When I went into your classroom to see what students were doing, they were reading or working on non-math worksheets.

Page 37: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Quality of Evidence reflection questions

1. Is the evidence factual and free of opinion? 2. Is the evidence high quality? 3. Does the language of the evidence reflect the language in the

rubric with differentiates “needs improvement” from “effective” practice in each element?

4. Does language of the evidence reflect the language in the rubric which helps to determine what “exemplary” practice looks like in each element?

5. Is there a preponderance of evidence to support a particular judgment about the performance level?

6. Is there enough evidence to make a judgment about the performance level? If not, what additional evidence could you collect to strengthen the decision? How could the artifacts be strengthened so that you could collect more high-quality evidence?

Page 38: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Evidence Statements

Page 39: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Evidence from Observations

Page 40: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Observing Lessons … CAUTION! …

We observe all the time, which means that it is easy to do, but hard to do objectively.

Remember

• We tend to see what we want to see• We have to be aware of and avoid bias,

particularly personal idiosyncrasies• We have to avoid preconceptions• Observation should be based upon agreed

criteria

Page 41: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Observation Bias

What is bias?

What are some examples of biases you have about teaching?

Page 42: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Observation of Chris McCloud: Selective Scripting

1. Read over the three excerpted elements from the rubric.

2. Watch the video.3. Examine the supporting documents. 4. While you are watching the video and reading

documents, collect evidence that will allow you to rate Mr. McCloud on the three elements. Use the worksheet to selectively script evidence related to each of the elements.

5. When you are finished, complete the worksheet and rate Mr. McCloud.

Page 43: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

How did you do?

Page 44: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Observations in the EDFS

BPS is currently developing an observation tool mobile app

Observational evidence will be uploaded to EDFS, and tagged to an appropriate category of the rubric

Observations may only be used in formative or summative evaluations if the educator received feedback within 5 days of the observation

Page 45: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Observation Mobile App

Page 46: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

What’s Next?

All evidence has to be uploaded to EDFS – even if the hard copy is not scanned, it has to be tagged as evidence and a hard copy kept in a binder.

Once you have collected evidence, you’ll give feedback to the teacher.

The online system is not a substitute for face-to-face conversation.

Page 47: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Artifact Evidence

Page 48: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

How detailed should an artifact be and how do you decide it demonstrates progress within an element, indicator, or

standard?

Artifacts: Can be used as supporting evidence of meeting an

element or an indicator within a standard to show examples of teacher performance and practice.

Can be used as evidence towards achievement of goals.

Artifacts should include evidence for multiple standards, indicators, or elements.

Page 49: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Page 50: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Collecting and Assessing Evidence - Artifacts

In this session you will work with artifacts.

They include: Student assessment data Student work Lesson plan review Review of teacher-made assessments

How many other types of artifacts are there? Identify possible sources of evidence in the standard you are assigned.

Page 51: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Artifact Activity ~ can be done at your school

Choose one priority element from yesterday’s “unpacking” exercise.

List and describe characteristics of artifacts at the proficient level for that priority area.

Page 52: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Activity: Artifacts in the Educator Plan

Review the Goal Setting and Educator Plan for C. McCloud

For your assigned action step, write down on a sticky note two artifacts that could be collected to show progress toward his goal.

Page 53: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Activity: Rating Artifacts from Chris McCloud

1. With a partner, evaluate the artifacts you have from Mr. McCloud.

2. On the Evaluator Record of Evidence form, analyze the artifact for evidence of performance (based on the Four Standards) and give feedback to Mr. McCloud.

3. Share your findings with elbow partners and identify any learning points / key issues. Be ready to share with the whole group.

Page 54: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

54

Page 55: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Page 56: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Rolling all evidence up into Ratings

Page 57: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Rolling all evidence up into ratings

Goal : Evaluators will understand how to assess elements and rate indicators and

standards the role of Formative Assessment , Formative

Evaluation and Summative Evaluation in giving ratings

how to use evidence to arrive at a rating at these three points

how much evidence is necessary to make a case the importance of calibration

Page 58: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Five-Step Evaluation System Cycle

Continuous Learning

Collaboration and Continuous Learning are the focus

Page 59: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

“Step 3” of the 5-step cycle: Implementation of the Plan

Evaluator collects evidence on the professional practice of educators, including:

Multiple measures of student learning Observations and artifacts

Evaluator provides feedback on practice to educators

Page 60: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Formative Assessment / Formative Evaluation and Summative Evaluation

Continuous Learning

Rubric is used to assess

performance and/or progress toward goals.

Page 61: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Page 62: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Page 63: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Final Activity: Overall Rating

Individually or with your partner (10 minutes)Based on the lesson transcript and the entries in the evidence log for Chris McCloud: On which of the standards would you feel prepared to give a rating?What would those ratings be?What would you next steps be to be prepared to rate Randy on all of the standards?

Group table (10 minutes) Share your ratings and identify any key learning points.

Page 64: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities

Teacher Rubric at a GlanceStandard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment

Standard II: Teaching All Students

Standard III: Family and Community Engagement

Standard IV: Professional Culture

A. Curriculum and Planning Indicator1.Subject Matter Knowledge2.Child and Adolescent Development3.Rigorous Standards-Based Design4.Well-Structured Lessons

A. Instruction Indicator1.Quality of Effort and Work2.Student Engagement3.Meeting Diverse Needs

A. Engagement Indicator1.Parent/Family Engagement

A. Reflection Indicator1.Reflective Practice 2.Goal SettingB. Professional Growth Indicator1.Variety of Assessment Methods2.Adjustments to Practice

B. Assessment Indicator1.Variety of Assessment Methods2.Adjustments to Practice

B. Assessment Indicator1.Safe Learning Environment2.Collaborative Learning Environment3.Student Motivation

B. Assessment Indicator1.Learning Expectations2.Curriculum Support

C. Collaboration Indicator1.Analysis and Conclusions2.Sharing Conclusions With Colleagues3.Sharing Conclusions With Students

C. Analysis Indicator1.Analysis and Conclusions2.Sharing Conclusions With Colleagues3.Sharing Conclusions With Students

C. Analysis Indicator1.Respects Differences2.Maintains Respectful Environment

C. Analysis Indicator1.Two-Way Communication2.Culturally Proficient Communication

D. Assessment Indicator1.Variety of Assessment MethodsE. Shared Responsibility Indicator1.Shared Responsibility

D. Expectations Indicator1.Clear Expectations2.High Expectations3.Access to Knowledge

F. Professional Responsibility Indicator1.Judgment2.Reliability and Responsibility