profamilia balanced scorecard

33
MSC/INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 20014/15 STUDENT NUMBER: 18323 UNIT NUMBER: POLIM 2048 UNIT TITLE: International Development Organizations UNIT TUTOR: Gastón Fornés ESSAY QUESTION NUMBER: N.A. ESSAY TITLE: Profamilia and the Balanced Scorecard: Planning for Survival. WORD COUNT: 1497 1

Upload: federico-ciacci

Post on 13-Aug-2015

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

MSC/INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 20014/15

STUDENT NUMBER: 18323

UNIT NUMBER: POLIM 2048

UNIT TITLE:  International Development

Organizations

UNIT TUTOR: Gastón Fornés       

ESSAY QUESTION NUMBER: N.A.

ESSAY TITLE:  Profamilia and the Balanced

Scorecard: Planning for Survival.

WORD COUNT: 1497

1

Page 2: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

PROFAMILIA AND THE BSC: PLANNING

FOR SURVIVAL

SITUATION:

The “Asociación Probienestar de la Familia Colombiana”, called also “Profamilia”, is a

non-profit organization specialized in providing sexual and reproductive health

services (SRHS) to the poorest segment of Colombia’s population. Administered as an

enterprise with a social orientation, Profamilia is the biggest national organisation

providing these services. With a proven successful track record, it was capable of

attracting generous international donations and to close distribution agreements with

global pharmaceutical companies. The key factor for its expansion lie in the distinctive

characteristic of its social objective: provide services at a lower cost than market value

without compromising quality.

At the beginning of the 1990s, two events threatened Profamilia’s survival: USAID, its

principal international donor, began to withdraw its support, while the “Law 100”

modified the way in which health services were offered, provided and financed (see

Exhibit 1). To respond to an increasingly competitive environment, Profamilia had to

alter its financial sustainability from donation-based to sales-based. However, in June

of 2004 senior management perceived that the efforts to secure sustainability without

compromising the social mission were insufficient. Therefore, a strategic plan is

required.

PROBLEMS:

The problems that Profamilia have to face were described as “natural consequences of

the change of the sector1”. The health care system liberalisation, together with the

vertical integration of health insurance and care provision, reduced significantly its

market share of SRHS and family planning services, which were previously contracted

out in a condition of quasi-monopoly. This affected also the sales of contraceptive

products: the quantity of contraceptive pills sold plummeted in the mid-1990s, while

the condoms declined less dramatically. Moreover, the rapid fall of USAID donations

deepened the organisation’s financial problems.

As a value based organisation, Profamilia do not want to risk damaging its social

1 Lobo Ivan D, Gutierrez, Roberto, and Sanabria, Raul. 2006. “Profamilia: Planning For Survive”. Social Enterprise Knowledge Network, November 30, p.11.

2

Page 3: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

commitment. However, for its own survival, it has to decide which direction to take

and where to specialize.

TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

Developing a balanced scorecard (BSc) can be a useful operation to help Profamilia

defining its objectives while moving towards its uncertain future position. The BSc is a

methodological tool based upon the cause-and-effect relationship of financial and

operational measures derived from the organisation’s decisions. It offers a full and

straightforward picture of the business while maintaining focus on its bottom-line

goal2. Identifying and measuring the specific value drivers that underpin performance,

the BSc converts vision and strategy into goals, indicators and targets. The aim is to

have each area equally aligned with the overall strategic objective and organisation’s

mission3.

Adopting the balanced scorecard paradigm presents a number of advantages for

Profamilia. Firstly, it enables senior management to understand that decisions to

improve one area may have negative impacts in another. Secondly, it facilitates

communication and understanding of goals and strategies at all levels of the

organisation, structuring personal objectives with the organisational ones4.

ANALYSIS

As stated above, the main Profamilia challenge derives from the increasingly

competitive environment. In a five years period, the NGO saw its income reduce by

26% (see Exhibit 2). Furthermore, the health sector reform and the contraction of aid

marked a drastic change in its financial structure. The organisation’s income shifted to

70% dependence on sales of products and SRHS, with a cross subsidy between these

services and other financially unviable but socially necessary programs. However,

even if the distribution of contraceptive products (in particular contraceptive pills) has

been one of its major sources of income, nowadays competitors control a good part of

the market share. Moreover, the RSHS suffered a slight decrease, underlining that the

organisation have to look for new customers and focus on different services to return

to the levels reached in mid 1990s (see Exhibit 3). Undoubtedly, the large number of 2 Kaplan, S. Robert and Norton, P. David. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, January – February, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.3 Contrada, Michael. 1999. “Using the Balanced Scorecard to Manage Value in Your Business”. Harvard Business Review, January, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.4 Kaplan, S. Robert. 2002. “Lead and Manage Your Organization with the Balanced Scorecard”. Harvard Business Review, July, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.

3

Page 4: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Colombians uncovered by either contributory or subsidized regime creates a concrete

expansion opportunity (see Exhibit 4). Since this is a strong non-profit organisation,

Profamilia possess the knowledge, local infrastructures, and relationships necessary

for reaching low- income customers, qualities often neglected by private corporations5.

Internally, improvements in management effectiveness and accountability, as well as

the professionalization and specialisation of its administrative structure, are key

factors for the accomplishment of its mission. Managing donations requires a relatively

simple structure, while generating income and competing in a free market requires

complex organisational skills and a well-crafted architecture, which deficiency is

potentially resource consuming. Indeed, achieving efficiency will contribute

substantially to maintaining affordable prices for disadvantaged people. Avoid loss of

quality is another imperative, since not only is it stated in Profamilia mission, but also

surveys on the perception of clients show that superior service quality and timely

attention are relevant driving forces for its success (see Exhibit 5).

For the creation of an effective business plan, Profamilia needs to individuate its own

competitive advantages and align them with its values. The prestigious image that

Profamilia created during 36 years of service, its specialisation, the ties with

international suppliers, and the relationship with the local population are inestimable

resources to play in the Colombian RSHS arena.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The organisation needs to embark on a new process of strategic planning in order to

“refine the business”6 and strengthen itself as an enterprise. It should define its

objectives under the four perspectives embodied in the BSc, deciding which factors

will drive future financial performance without compromising Profamilia’s vision (see

Exhibit 6).

Financial Perspective

Concerning the financial perspective, Profamilia needs to increase revenues as

well as improve efficiency within the organisation. In expanding revenues,

Profamilia should launch new services and products, in order to cross subsidise

socially necessary programmes and therefore sustain its bottom-line objective.

Crucial to its survival, increase the market share by targeting the unmet

demand must assume a pivotal role. Decentralisation, community-based

5 Brugmann, Jeb and Proahalad, Coimbatore K. 2007. “Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact”. Harvard Business Review, February, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.6 Lobo Ivan D, Gutierrez, Roberto, and Sanabria, Raul. 2006. “Profamilia: Planning For Survive”. Social Enterprise Knowledge Network, November 30, p.11.

4

Page 5: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

programmes, and strengthening the mobile brigades are viable options, but an

evaluation of community needs should be the first step of the operation.

Undoubtedly, a positive cash flow as well as low ratio of asset to liabilities

represents essential indicators for measuring Profamilia’s success in the RSHS

sector.

Customer Perspective

Regarding the customer perspective, the intent is to improve the general image

of the NGO by developing regular communication between customer,

stakeholders and employees. Systematise communication between

departments, foster transparency and involve stakeholders in the amelioration

of the business are key elements for increasing the eminent and trustworthy

reputation that Profamilia already enjoy. Moreover, the publication of an annual

memory, together with a constant presence on the web, will facilitate the

process with tangible and immediate results.

Internal Business Perspective

In support of achieving its customer and financial objectives, Profamilia should

elaborate initiatives to sustain its image and grow its revenue base. To maintain

affordable prices for low-income population, the organisation must strengthen

the relationship with suppliers and evaluate and provide operational excellence

in the cross subside system. Furthermore, Profamilia needs to deepen the

relationship with local population by making consumers aware of available

services, both to increase its customer base and to spread family planning

culture. Diversification of RSHS and schools programmes are useful initiatives

that will create long-term benefits necessary to achieve its goals.

Learning & Growth Perspective

In order to satisfy the strategic objective, Profamilia must create an

environment that maximize the contribution of his employees. Spreading an

objective-oriented culture among personnel is a challenging task for every

enterprise that is willing to compete at its best. Generally, training and

outcome-based agreements are the most common solution for fostering such an

environment. However, the elaboration of a BSc in every department of

Profamilia’s structure will definitely help this process, as it defines clear targets

and increases the commitment of lower level management. The amelioration of

existent structures and equipment is another pivotal point, as surveys show that

quality of installation figures are at the bottom side among the reasons for

choosing Profamilia services (see Exhibit 5).

5

Page 6: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

CONLCUSIONS

Refine the business, meet the unmet demand, and launch new products and services

are undoubtedly the organisation priorities. The workload for the employees is

considerable, and the lack of focus on the human resources dimension is perhaps the

greatest BSc weakness. However, thanks to Profamilia solid reputation and

experience, the organisation has substantial room of improvement in the RSHS sector.

Exhibit 1. The Health Sector Reform in Colombia

6

Page 7: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Exhibit 2. Profamilia – Composition of Income (in US Dollars)

7

Page 8: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Exhibit 3. Volume of Services in Profamilia

Exhibit 4. Population and Participation to the Contributory Regime (by type of insurer)

8

Page 9: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Population and Participation to the Subsidized Regime (by type of insurer)

Exhibit 5. Percentage of Clients by Preferences (by type of client)

9

Page 10: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

10

Page 11: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

11

Page 12: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

12

Page 13: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Perception of Quality of Attention (by type of client)

13

Page 14: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

14

Page 15: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

15

Page 16: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

16

Page 17: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

17

PR

OFA

MIL

IA V

isio

n

To d

ispense

fam

ily p

lannin

g, se

xual and

repro

duct

ive h

ealt

hpro

gra

mth

roughout

the C

olo

mbia

n p

opula

tion, in

part

icula

ram

ong e

conom

ically

less

-favore

d c

lass

,pro

vidin

g h

igh q

ualit

y se

rvic

e a

nd

resp

ect

ing indiv

idual ri

ghts

and t

he r

ights

of

couple

s as

outl

ined in t

he c

urr

ent

const

ituti

onal fr

am

ew

ork

Learn

ing

& G

row

th P

ers

pecti

ve

To a

chie

ve o

ur

vis

ion,

how

will w

e s

ust

ain

our

ab

ilit

y t

o c

hange

and

im

pro

ve?

Diff

ere

nti

ati

ng, Res

truct

uri

ng,

Ch

angin

gM

indse

t.

Goals

Measu

res

Targ

ets

Obje

ctiv

e-O

riente

d M

anagem

en

t C

ult

ure

Develo

ped

# O

fC

linic

s Pr

ovid

ing M

onth

ly R

eport

s

# O

f C

hie

f Ph

ysi

cians

Succ

ess

fully

Com

ple

ting

Leaders

hip

Tra

inin

g

% O

f Em

plo

yees

Succ

ess

fully

Com

ple

tin

gR

isk

Man

agem

ent

Train

ing

# C

linic

s D

evelo

ped A

BS

c

10

0%

Of

Clin

ic P

rovid

es

Month

ly R

eport

s W

ith

Feedb

ack

s A

nd A

chie

vem

en

ts T

o M

an

agers

10

0%

Of

Chie

f Physi

cian

s Succ

ess

fully

Com

ple

ting L

eaders

hip

Tra

inin

g

10

0%

Em

plo

yees

Succ

ess

fully

Com

ple

tin

gR

isk M

an

agem

en

t Tr

ain

ing

10

0%

Clin

ics

Develo

ped A

BS

c

Cult

ura

l Alig

nm

en

t A

mon

g E

mplo

yees

# O

f Jo

bs

Desc

ripti

ons

Wit

h S

trate

gic

Goals

# V

alu

e B

ase

s Tr

ain

ing H

ou

rs

Sta

ffPr

ofe

sionalis

ati

on

40

Ann

ual H

our

/ Ye

ar

Train

ing H

ours

Dia

gnosi

s A

nd S

tock

Lis

tin

g O

f Te

chnic

al

Eq

uip

ment

Dra

fted

# O

f C

linic

Ela

bora

te D

iagn

osi

s Fo

r Te

chnic

al

Eq

uip

ment

10

0%

Of

Clin

ic E

labora

te D

iagnosi

s Fo

rTe

chnic

al Equ

ipm

en

t

New

Pro

du

ct Intr

oduce

d#

New

Pro

duct

s La

unch

ed

Div

ers

ifica

te P

rod

uct

Off

er

Inte

rnal B

usin

ess P

ers

pecti

ve

To s

ati

sfy o

ur

cust

om

ers

and s

takehold

ers

, w

hat

busi

ness

pro

cess

mu

st w

e e

xce

l a

t?

Provid

ing A

fford

able

Serv

ices,

Div

ers

ifica

te, E

du

cate

.

Goals

Measu

res

Targ

ets

Provid

e A

fford

able

Serv

ices

For

Low

er

Cla

ss P

rice

s / Pr

ices

Main

tain

Act

ual Pr

ices

Ed

uca

te Y

oun

g C

ouple

s To

Fam

ily P

lann

ing

# o

f S

chool

Progra

mm

e L

au

nch

ed

Cover

30%

Of

Pub

lic S

chools

Provid

e A

Vast

Range O

f Pr

od

uct

s A

nd

Proce

du

res

For

Fam

ily P

lann

ing

Mark

et

Share

Quota

For

Alt

ern

ati

ve

Contr

ace

pti

ve M

eth

od

s

Doub

le T

he A

ctual Q

uota

Of

IUD

, Im

pla

nt,

Ste

rilis

ati

on

, A

nd

Em

erg

ency

Con

trace

pti

on

Sold

Sexual A

nd R

epro

duct

ive H

ealt

h S

erv

ices

Div

ers

ifica

ted

# O

f N

ew

Opp

ort

un

itie

s Id

en

tified

Imple

ment

New

Serv

ices

Cu

sto

mer

Pers

pecti

ve

To a

chie

ve o

ur

vis

ion,

how

should

we a

ppear

to o

ur

cust

om

ers

?

Relia

ble

, Effi

cient,

Trust

wort

hy, N

eu

tral.

Goals

Measu

res

Targ

ets

Leaders

hip

In

Fam

ily P

lan

nin

g S

ect

or

% In

Qu

alit

y C

ontr

ol Surv

eys

% R

etu

rnin

g C

ust

om

ers

50

% O

f C

ust

om

ers

Jud

gin

g Q

ualit

y A

ttenti

on

As

"Very

Good

"

90

% R

etu

rnin

g C

ust

om

ers

Giv

e A

Trust

wort

hy Im

age

% O

f C

linic

s Show

ing A

dvert

isin

g M

ate

rial

% In

Qu

alit

y C

ontr

ol Surv

eys

% L

oyalt

y

10

0%

Of

Clin

ics

Sh

ow

ing A

dvert

isin

gM

ate

rial

95

% O

f C

ust

om

ers

Consi

der

PR

OFA

MIL

IA"E

xtr

em

ely

Trust

wort

hy"

85

% O

f Retu

rnin

g C

ust

om

ers

Tran

spare

nt

Com

mun

icati

on

Wit

h C

ust

om

er

And S

take

hold

ers

Syst

em

ati

sed

# O

f C

linic

s Pro

du

cin

g H

igh

Qu

alit

y M

on

thly

Report

s

# O

f C

linic

sPu

blic

isin

g A

nnual M

em

ory

10

0%

Of

Clin

ics

Dra

fts

Mon

thly

Rep

ort

s

10

0%

Of

Clin

ics

Public

ise A

nnual M

em

ory

Ad

voca

cy Im

pro

ved

# O

f C

linic

s Pro

du

cin

g M

onth

ly Info

rms

10

0%

Clin

ics

Dra

fts

Mon

thly

Report

s

Fin

an

cia

lP

ers

pecti

ve

To a

chie

ve o

ur

goals

, how

shou

ld w

e a

ppe

ar

to o

ur

stakehold

ers

?

Self-S

ust

ain

ab

le,

Healt

hy,

Independent.

Goals

Measu

res

Targ

ets

Finan

cial S

tabili

tyM

ain

tain

ed

Cash

Flo

w

Rati

o O

f To

tal A

ssets

To C

urr

ent

Liabili

ties

Rati

o O

f C

urr

en

t A

ssets

To T

ota

l Lia

bili

ties

% O

f Pr

ivate

Revenue T

o T

ota

l Revenue

Posi

tive C

ash

Flo

w

Low

Lia

bili

ties

To A

sset

Rati

o

Gro

wth

New

Reven

ue

Net

Inco

me

Gro

ss R

even

ues

(Tota

l / N

et

Trend

s)

Incr

ease

Reven

ues

Gro

w N

ew

Serv

ice R

evenu

es

Incr

ease

Mark

et

Sh

are

Tota

l Mark

et

Sh

are

Quota

# O

f N

ew

Affi

liate

Wit

hPr

ofa

mili

a

Gain

Mark

et

Sh

are

Meet

Unm

et

Dem

an

d

Effi

ciency

Incr

ease

d

Mean-T

ime R

esp

onse

To A

Serv

ice C

all

Effi

ciency

Rati

o

Cost

Of

Ph

ysi

cian V

isit

/ N

um

ber

Of

Ph

ysi

cian

Cost

Per

Couple

Year

Pro

tect

ion

15

% T

ime R

ed

uce

d F

or

Provid

ing S

erv

ices

Decr

ease

Avera

ge C

riti

cal L

evel O

fO

verc

row

din

g

Impro

ve E

ffici

en

cy R

ati

o

Decr

ease

Cost

Per

Serv

ice

Ad

ap

ted

fro

m t

he B

ala

nced

Score

card

by R

ob

ert

S.

Kap

lan

an

d D

ave P

. N

ort

on

. H

arv

ard

Bu

sin

ess S

ch

ool

Pre

ss.

19

96

.

Page 18: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Exhibit 6. Profamilia BSc

Actu

al

De

c

‘0

4

Jun

‘05

Dec

‘04

Target

% of Customer Judging Quality of Attention as

“Very Good”

45.5

%

2% 1.5

%

1% 50%

% Returning Customer 77.5

%

5% 4% 3.5

%

90%

% of Clinics Showing Advertising Material X 75

%

25% 0% 100%

% of Customer Considering Profamilia “Extrimely

Trustworthy”

X 80

%

10% 5% 95%

# of Clincs Producing High-Quality Monthly

Reports

X 80

%

20% 0% 100%

# of Clinics Publicising Annual Memory X 80

%

10% 10% 100%

# of Clinincs Producing Monthly Informs X 80

%

10% 10% 100%

18

Objectives

A) LEADERSHIP IN FAMILY PLANNIG SECTOR

B) GIVE A TRUSTWORTHY IMMAGE

C) TRANSPARENT COMMUNICATION WITH CUSTOMER

AND STAKEHOLDERS SYSTEMATISED

D)ADVOCACY IMPROVED

Page 19: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Actua

l

Dec

‘04

Jun

‘05

Dec

‘04

Target

Ratio of Total Asset to Current Liabilities X X X X X

Ratio of Current Assets to Total Liabilities X X X X X

Net Income $1378706

0

+1

%

+1

%

+2

%

$14345464

19

- R e v ie w A n d A m e l io r a t e Q u a l i t y C o n t r o l S y s t e m- M o n t h ly S e r v ic e - L e v e l R e v ie w M e e ti n g T o R e v ie w S e r v ic e - L e v e l C o m p l ia n c e A n d Im p le m e n t Im p r o v e m e n t s- P r o a c ti v e M a n a g e m e n t O f R is k T o R e p u t a ti o n- E la b o r a t e A S y s t e m A n d A P r a c ti c a l G u id e T o H a n d l in g C u s t o m e r C o m p la in t sB e n c h m a r k C o m p e ti t o r s F o r Q u a l i t y , P r ic in g A n d C o v e r a g e

- R e n e w A d v e r ti s in g- Im p r o v e M a t e r ia l D is t r ib u ti o n- R e f r e s h C o n s t a n t ly W e b P a g e s- Im p r o v e D o c t o r - P a ti e n t C o m m u n ic a ti o n- C l in ic B a la n c e A v a i la b le O n R e q u e s t- Id e n ti f y K e y S t a k e h o ld e r s W h o C a n H e lp P r o v id e A n O u t s id e - In V ie w

- P r e s e n t A n n u a l H ig h - Q u a l i t y R e p o r t ( F in a n c ia l a n d P r o g r a m m a ti c ) T o S t a k e h o ld e r s- P u b l i s h A n A n n u a l M e m o r y- F o s t e r A C u lt u r e O f S y s t e m a ti s a ti o n A n d P u b l ic a ti o n O f P u b l ic R e p o r t s A b o u t T h e C o m p a n y 's A c ti v iti e s

- S t r e n g t h E ff o r t s T o G e n e r a t e S t r o n g P u b l ic , P o l iti c a l , A n d F in a n c ia l C o m m it m e n t T o A n d S u p p o r t F o r S e x u a l A n d R e p r o d u c ti v e H e a l t h A n d R ig h t s A t T h e N a ti o n a l A n d In t e r n a ti o n a l L e v e l

Initiatives

Objectives

A) LEADERSHIP IN FAMILY PLANNIG SECTOR

B) GIVE A TRUSTWORTHY IMMAGE

C) TRANSPARENT COMMUNICATION WITH CUSTOMER

AND STAKEHOLDERS SYSTEMATISED

D)ADVOCACY IMPROVED

A

B

C

D

Page 20: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Gross Revenues X X X X X

Total Market Share Quota X X X X X

# of New Affiliates to Profamilia X 170

0

170

0

170

0

5600

Mean-Time Response to a Service Call X -5% -5% -5% -15%

Cost of Physician Visit / Number of Physician X X X X X

Cost Per Couple Year Protection X X X X X

*The case study does not provide sufficient data to carry out an accurate financial analysis.

20

Objectives

A) FINANCIAL STABILITY MANTAINED

B) GROWTH NEW REVENUE

C) INCREASE THE MARKET SHARE

Page 21: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Actu

al

Dec

‘04

Jun

‘05

Dec

‘04

Target

Start of Period Prices / End of Period Prices 0 +0

%

+0

%

+0

%

+0%

% of Local School Launching Familiy Planning

Programme

0 10% 10% 10% 30%

Market Share Quota For Alternative

Contraceptove Methods*

X X X X X

21

- O r g a n is a ti o n R e s t r u c t u r in g- C o n d u c t A F e a s ib i l i t y A n a ly s is , P r e p a r e F in a n c ia l P r o je c ti o n s A n d A B u s in e s s P la n- P r o v id e H ig h - Q u a l i t y F in a n c ia l In f o r m s- E v a lu a t e T h e O p p o r t u n it y O f F in a n c ia l I n v e s t m e n t s- I n c r e a s e P r iv a t e D o n a ti o n s- R e d u c e / R e o r g a n is e P e r s o n n e l C o s t s

- D iv e r s ifi c a ti o n O f S e x u a l A n d R e p r o d u c ti v e H e a l t h S e r v ic e s- S a le s O f N o n - C o n t r a c e p ti v e ( P a p S m e a r K i t , P r e g n a n c y T e s t )- A d v e r ti s in g C a m p a ig n T h r o u g h E d u c a ti o n a l C o m m u n it y P r o g r a m m e

- E v a lu a t e N e e d s O f L o c a l C o m m u n iti e s- C r e a t e A C o m m u n it y - B a s e d D is t r ib u ti o n P r o g r a m F o r R u r a l A r e a s- E m p o w e r A n d S u s t a in M o b i le B r ig a d e s- D e c e n t r a l i z in g B u d g e ti n g A n d M a n a g e m e n t O f S e r v ic e D e l iv e r y , W it h L o c a l M a n a g e r s R a t h e r T h a n H e a d q u a r t e r s O ffi c ia ls M a k in g S t a ffi n g A n d S p e n d in g D e c is io n s

- B e n c h m a r k O t h e r O r g a n is a ti o n- M e a s u r e E m p lo y e e s P r o d u c ti v i t y- A p p ly C o d e O f C o n d u c t

Initiatives

Objectives

A) FINANCIAL STABILITY MANTAINED

B) GROWTH NEW REVENUE

C) INCREASE THE MARKET SHARE

A

B

C

D

Page 22: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

# of New Opportunities Identified 0 1 1 1 3

*The case study does not provide sufficient data about the market share quota.

22

Objectives

A) PROVIDE AFFORDABLE SERVICE FOR LOWER CLASS

B) EDUCATE YOUNG COUPLE TO FAMILY PLANNING

C) PROVIDE A VAST RANGE OF PRODUCTS AND

PROCEDURES FOR FAMILY PLANNING

D)SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES

DIVERSIFICATED

Page 23: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Actu

al

De

c

‘0

4

Jun

‘05

De

c

‘0

4

Target

# of Clinics Providing Monthly Reports X 35 X X 35

(100%)

# of Chief Physicians Successfully Completing

Leadership Training

X 17 17 17 51

23

- M a i n t a i n F a v o r a b l e R e l a ti o n s h i p W i t h S u p p l i e r s M a k i n g E a r l y C a s h P a y m e n t - S t r e n g t h e n T i e s W i t h L o c a l R e t a i l e r s W i t h A n O n - T i m e S u p p l y , O n g o i n g C o m m u n i c a ti o n A n d D i s c o u n t F o r I m m e d i a t e C a s h P a y m e n t - V a l u e E ffi c i e n c y O f C r o s s S u b s i d y

- D e s i g n F a m i l y P l a n n i n g P r o g r a m m e F o r Y o u n g C o u p l e s - M o n t h l y H o u r s T o S p e n d W i t h i n S c h o o l P r o g r a m m e s

- E s t a b l i s h A C o m m i s s i o n F o r I n c r e a s e A w a r e n e s s O f A l t e r n a ti v e C o n t r a c e p ti v e M e t h o d s A m o n g P o p u l a ti o n

- M o n t h l y S e r v i c e - O p p o r t u n i t y R e v i e w M e e ti n g T o R e v i e w C o m m u n i t y N e e d s- I m p r o v e M o b i l e B r i g a d e s A n d C l i n i c s C o m m u n i c a ti o n

A

B

CrD

Objectives

A) PROVIDE AFFORDABLE SERVICE FOR LOWER CLASS

B) EDUCATE YOUNG COUPLE TO FAMILY PLANNING

C) PROVIDE A VAST RANGE OF PRODUCTS AND

PROCEDURES FOR FAMILY PLANNING

D)SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES

DIVERSIFICATED

Initiatives

Page 24: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

# of Employees Successfully Completing Risk

Management Training

X 80 80 80 240

# of Clinics Developing a BSc X 35 X X 35

(100%)

# of Value Bases Training Hours X 40 40 40 120

# of Clinics Elaborating Diagnosis for Technical

Equipment

X 35 X X 35(100

%)

# of New Products Launched X X 1 1 2

24

- N e g o ti a t e O u t c o m e - B a s e d A g r e e m e n t A n d G o a l s W i t h P e r s o n n e l- C o n d u c t A S W O T A n a l y s i s- F o r m u l a t e A n d E v a l u a t e O p e r a ti o n a l P l a n s P e r i o d i c a l l y - E s t a b l i s h I n d i c a t o r s A n d A g r e e i n g O n O u t c o m e s T o M o n i t o r A n d E v a l u a t e- I m p l e m e n t P e r f o r m a n c e - R e l a t e d P o l i c y O f B e n e fi t s A n d S a n c ti o n s- D e v e l o p A R i s k M a n a g e m e n t T r a i n i n g P r o g r a m m e F o r E m p l o y e e s- P r o v i d e G u i d e l i n e s F o r M a n a g e m e n t T o A s s e s s R i s k P r o b a b i l i ti e s O r I m p a c t s- E s t a b l i s h L o n g - T e r m S t r a t e g i c G o a l s - C r e a t e A L e a d e r s h i p T r a i n i n gA n d P r o v i d e C h i e f P h y s i c i a n s W i t h L e a d e r s h i p M a n u a l s- B e n c h m a r k s F o r A c ti v i ti e s A n d I m m e d i a t e O u t p u t s

- R e n e w A d v e r ti s i n g- I m p r o v e M a t e r i a l D i s t r i b u ti o n- R e f r e s h C o n s t a n t l y W e b P a g e s- I m p r o v e D o c t o r - P a ti e n t C o m m u n i c a ti o n- C l i n i c B a l a n c e A v a i l a b l e O n R e q u e s t- I d e n ti f y K e y S t a k e h o l d e r s W h o C a n H e l p P r o v i d e A n O u t s i d e - I n V i e w

- E l a b o r a t e A D i a g n o s i s F o r T e c h n i c a l E q u i p m e n t- C o n t a c t S u p p l i e r s N e w E q u i p m e n t P r o p o s a l

- D e v e l o p N o n - C o n t r a c e p ti v e P r o d u c t s ( P a p S m e a r K i t , P r e g n a n c y T e s t )

Objectives

A) OBJECTIVE-ORIENTED MANAGEMENT CULTURE

DEVELOPED

B) CULTURAL ALIGNEMENT AMONG EMPLOYEES

C) DIAGNOSIS AND STOCK LISTING OF TECHNICAL

EQUIPMENT DRAFTED

D)NEW PRODUCTS INTRODUCED

A

B

C

D

Initiatives

Page 25: Profamilia Balanced Scorecard

Bibliography

Brugmann, Jeb and Proahalad, Coimbatore K. 2007. “Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact”. Harvard Business Review, February, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.

Contrada, Michael. 1999. “Using the Balanced Scorecard to Manage Value in Your Business”. Harvard Business Review, January, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.

Kaplan, S. Robert. 2002. “Lead and Manage Your Organization with the Balanced Scorecard”. Harvard Business Review, July, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.

Kaplan, S. Robert and Norton, P. David. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, January – February, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, US.

Case Study:

Lobo Ivan D, Gutierrez, Roberto, and Sanabria, Raul. 2006. “Profamilia: Planning For Survive”. Social Enterprise Knowledge Network, November 30.

25

Objectives

A) OBJECTIVE-ORIENTED MANAGEMENT CULTURE

DEVELOPED

B) CULTURAL ALIGNEMENT AMONG EMPLOYEES

C) DIAGNOSIS AND STOCK LISTING OF TECHNICAL

EQUIPMENT DRAFTED

D)NEW PRODUCTS INTRODUCED