productivity - university of washingtoncourses.washington.edu/lingclas/481/productivity.pdf ·...

29
Productivity Winter 2011 LING 481/581

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Productivity

    Winter 2011

    LING 481/581

  • Productivity

    • Does a linguistic generalization have

    exceptions?

    • Productivity generally not an issue in syntax

    – No exceptions to wh-movement

    – But Dative Shift lexically idiosyncratic

  • from Quirk and Greenbaum 1973: 370-371

  • Productivity in morphology

    • Interacts with assumptions about

    – lexical representations

    – nature of morphological rules

    • Morphology as lexical entry matching

    – ə (C)]{Adj, N} –ize]V

    – /sɪvəl/ „civil‟, /fjuDəl/ „feudal‟

    – civilize, feudalize

    – But /fjuDəl/ „futile‟, *futilize

  • • Morphology as word schemata

    /ˈXə(C)/ /ˈXəCajz/ /XəCəˈzeʃən /

    Adj Verb Noun

    „X‟ „cause to become X‟ „state of having become X‟

    vs.

    (lexically specific schema)

    /ˈsɪvəl/ /ˈsɪvəlajz/

    Adj Verb

    „civil‟ „cause to become civil, domesticate‟

    (general word schema)

    /ˈXəlajz/ /Xələˈzeʃən /

    Verb Noun

    „cause to become X‟ „state of having become Xized‟

  • “Unlimited applicability”

    • Productivity scalar/probabilistic rather than

    absolute

    • Derivation generally less productive than

    inflection

    • Differences between derivational morphemes

  • Blocking

    • Real words block potential words if the

    potential word would have the same

    meaning and function of the real word.

    • russify blocks russianize

    • children blocks childs

    • to mail blocks to mailbox

    • knife blocks cutter in “hand me that cutter”

  • The importance of synonymy

    • Other meanings of cutter

    – http://www.oed.com.offcampus.lib.washington

    .edu/search?searchType=dictionary&q=cutter

    &_searchBtn=Search

    • not blocked by knife

  • -ity vs. -ness

    • Blocking not an issue?

    – porosity, porousness

    – grammaticality, grammaticalness

  • ]Adj ity]N „having Adj quality‟

    • Marchand 1969

    • lexical conditions on base

    – -al, -ial, -ar, -ous (some) (-ability, -ibility, -icity)

    – Romance only („The oldest words are 14th and

    15th century loans from French, such as

    ability, actuality, agility, bestiality, captivity,

    diversity, impassibility, infirmity, liberality,

    lubricity, singularity’) (http://www.oed.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/view/Entry/110807?redirectedFrom=lubri

    city#)

  • -ality nouns

    • actuality

    • bestiality

    • virtuality

    • fatality

    • brutality

    • vocality

    • reality

    • causality

    • literality

    • banality

    • technicality

  • -arity nouns

    • singularity

    • peculiarity

    • regularity

    • linearity

    • similarity

  • -icity nouns

    • rusticity

    • electricity

    • authenticity

    • elasticity

    • domesticity

    • publicity

    • atomicity

    • historicity

  • -osity nouns

    • porosity

    • curiosity

    • luminosity

  • -ability nouns

    • 'the derivative range of –able/-ability (the graphic variant

    –ible/ibility has only weakly developed) today comprises

    practically any adjective in –able, including adjectives

    derived from native roots (lovable, lovability).‟ (p. 313)

  • Non-existent bases

    • superfluity (superfluous)

    • atrocity (atrocious)

    • hilarity (hilarious)

    • duplicity

    • felicity

    • fidelity

  • ]Adj nəs]N „having Adj quality‟

    • „Since Old English it has chiefly been

    tacked on to adjectives and participial

    adjectives, but in modern English it is also

    used with various other bases, but not with

    verbs.‟ (p. 334)

    • redness, fearfulness, sugariness, slap-

    happiness

  • Two experiments re –ity/ness

    • Aronoff and Schvaneveldt 1978

    • Is –ness really more productive than –ity?

    – investigated „whether productivity is a simple

    historical fact (some patterns are more successful

    than others in the long run) or whether it figures in the

    individual‟s knowledge of the language‟

    • Lexical decision task

    – Is this an (English) word?

    • judgement data

    • reaction time data (but not this study)

  • • “the –ness suffix is more productive than –ity

    with words ending in –ive.” (p. 109)

    • Investigated preferences for –ity vs. –ness

    attached to:

    – actual words: activity, assertiveness (listed in dict)

    – possible words: effervescivity (effervescive),

    affirmativeness (affirmative) (base in dict)

    – non-words: lugativity, remortiveness

    • Which words in each category are preferred?

  • Preference results

    • Actual words

    – -ity preferred over –ness

    • Potential words

    – -ness preferred over –ity

    • Non-words

    – no preference

    • “Anticipated Results. If speakers can consistently

    distinguish productivity, we expect that nonexistent words

    of the form Xiveness will be judged to be actual words

    more often than nonexistent words of the form Xivity.”

  • Another experiment

    • Anshen and Aronoff 1988

    • Xiveness vs. Xivity; Xibility vs. Xibleness

    • Task: “List all the words you can think of.”

    • Prediction: more words in Xibility,

    Xiveness (most productive patterns)

  • Results

    • More –ity words over all

    • But more –ness non-words (nonce words)

  • Anshen and Aronoff‟s

    interpretation • -ity forms are stored in the lexicon

    • -ness forms are built by rule as needed

  • Summary

    • Conditions on rules/schemata formulated

    correctly?

    • Morphological elements differ in

    productivity

    • Blocking

    • Experimental studies of productivity