procurement: fundamentals to forward thinking

29
06/10/2016 1 6 October 2016 RISK TO REWARD SEMINAR SERIES: GRAHAM RAGAN PHUONG T.V. NGO STEPHANIE PEARCE PROCUREMENT: FUNDAMENTALS TO FORWARD THINKING

Upload: gowling-wlg

Post on 20-Jan-2017

28 views

Category:

Law


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

06/10/2016

1

6 October 2016

RISK TO REWARD SEMINAR SERIES:

GRAHAM RAGANPHUONG T.V. NGO

STEPHANIE PEARCE

PROCUREMENT: FUNDAMENTALS TO FORWARD THINKING

06/10/2016

2

OVERVIEW

• Introduction to Procurement Fundamentals

• Perspective: Bidder vs. Owner

– Conflict of Interest

– Conducting a Fair Process

– Clarification of Q’s and A’s

– Sole Sourcing Contracts

– Selecting a Winning Bidder

06/10/2016

3

3

OWNER

BIDDER

06/10/2016

4

Conflict of Interest

4

06/10/2016

5

Conflict of Interest

06/10/2016

6

Definition of Conflict of Interest

• “Conflict of Interest” is a situation in which financial or other personal considerations have the potential to compromise or bias professional judgment and objectivity.

• An “Apparent Conflict of Interest” is one in which a reasonable person would think that the professional’s judgment is likely to be compromised.

06/10/2016

7

Owner

• Take all possible steps to prevent and resolve any real, apparent or potential conflicts of interest.

• Proactive disclosure of conflict is key

• A bidder or prospective bidder may need to be disqualified in order to preserve the integrity of a procurement process

• Important to clearly define the circumstances that may constitute a conflict of interest in order to ensure that a decision to disqualify is transparent and defensible

06/10/2016

8

Bidder

• Internal compliance – ensure that all stakeholders are aware of and in compliance with requirements to avoid COIs

• Proactive disclosure of conflict is key – complete and accurate completion of COI declarations or certifications

• Appropriate Communications- exercise caution during the procurement process

06/10/2016

9

Conducting a Fair Process

9

06/10/2016

10

-

06/10/2016

11

Owner

• Fairness, openness and transparency

• Internal procurement polices

• Common Law Principles

– Duty of good faith

– Duty to disclose material information

– Duty to disclose the rated criteria

– Tender deadlines are to be strictly enforced

– Duty to only accept compliant bids

06/10/2016

12

Bidder

• Common Law Principles

– Duty of good faith

– Duty to disclose material information

– Duty to disclose the rated criteria

– Tender deadlines are to be strictly enforced

– Duty to accept only compliant bids

– Duty of the bidder to honour its tender

06/10/2016

13

Clarification of Qs and As

13

06/10/2016

14

Clarification of Qs and As

06/10/2016

15

Inquiry Process

• The inquiry process is often the best opportunity

in the bid process to dialogue with the soliciting party

• Bidders can seek clarification or object to a requirement

• Questions and answers get incorporated into the RFP as amendments, and are provided to all bidders

06/10/2016

16

Owner

• Ensure the information provided is not misleading

• Questions and answers should be provided to all bidders

• Answers should be incorporated into RFP as amendments

06/10/2016

17

Bidder

• Don’t miss the boat – If you have a question, ask!

• Act quickly – Don’t “wait and see”

– It is incumbent upon the bidder to seek clarification or object to the requirement

– Bidder bears the onus to seek clarification before submitting a bid if they believe the wording is unclear or ambiguous

• Be mindful of mandatory requirements

06/10/2016

18

Sole Sourcing Contracts

18

06/10/2016

19

Sole Sourcing Contracts

06/10/2016

20

Sole Sourcing Contracts

• Less competitive procurement process where government entity able to contact a sole or single supplier or a number of suppliers individually

• If under the CITT jurisdiction

– Trade agreements apply

– Sole sourcing can be legally challenged

• Public entities outside of CITT jurisdiction/private entities:

– Can self-impose policies against sole-sourcing

– No common law legal duty to engage in open and competitive procurement processes

06/10/2016

21

Owner

• Public vs. private

• Exception to competition – onus is on the owner to show this method is appropriate

• Expediency or convenience won’t cut it

• Increased risk

06/10/2016

22

Bidder

• Selected as sole source

• Objecting to selection of a sole sourcing provider

06/10/2016

23

Selecting a Winning Bidder

23

06/10/2016

24

06/10/2016

25

Owner

• Follow the RFP

• Follow the process

• Minimize ambiguous requirements

• Do not evaluate undisclosed criteria

• Award to winning bidder

• Record Keeping

06/10/2016

26

Bidder

• Ensure compliance with all mandatory requirements

• Challenging after the selection

• Forum and process

• Evidentiary issues

06/10/2016

27

QUESTIONS?

27

06/10/2016

28

CONTACT US

Stephanie PearcePartner

[email protected]

613-783-8842

Phuong T.V. NgoPartner

[email protected]

613-786-0236

Graham RaganPartner

[email protected]

613-786-8699

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and coordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail at gowlingwlg.com/legal

06/10/2016

29