processes of development - · pdf filemoral development theory moral development...
TRANSCRIPT
3/1/2014
1
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
THEORIES:
PIAGET, VYGOTSKY, KOHLBERG
KEY IDEAS
• Cognitive development is the product of children’s efforts to understand the world
• In order to adapt to our world, we constantly build schemes (actions or mental representations that organize knowledge)
• Children constantly assimilate and accommodate as they seek equilibrium
PROCESSES OF DEVELOPMENT
1. Adaptation – how one handles new information
a) Assimilation – using existing schemes in dealing with new experiences
b) Accommodation – adjusting one’s schemes in dealing with new experiences
2. Organization – grouping isolated and behaviors into a higher-order system
3. Equilibration – striving for balance; shifting from one stage to the next
SENSORIMOTOR STAGE
Sensorimotor stage (birth to 2 years old)
- infants understand the world by coordinating
one’s senses with motor actions
• Schemes developed:
Habits – based on a reflex that has become
completely separated from its eliciting
stimulus
Circular reaction – repetitive behavior
SENSORIMOTOR STAGE
3/1/2014
2
SENSORIMOTOR STAGE
Substages of the Sensorimotor Stage
1. Reflexes – coordinating senses and actions through inborn reflexes
- Example: Sucking reflex
2. Primary circular reactions – first signs of intentionality
- Example: Sucking one’s thumb,
3. Secondary circular reactions – interaction with the environment; repeat action that bring interesting results
- Example: Shaking a rattle; cooing to get attention
SENSORIMOTOR STAGESubstages of the Sensorimotor Stage
4. Coordination of secondary circular reactions – coordination of schemes and intentionality
- Example: Using a stick to bring an object nearer; grasping a toy simultaneously
5. Tertiary circular reactions – “little experimenter”
- Example: Making a block fall, spin, and hit another object
6. Internalization of schemes – representational ability develops; ability to use primitive symbols
- Example: Mimicking matchbox being opened and closed by using one’s mouth
PREOPERATIONAL STAGE
Preoperational stage (2-7 years old)
- children begin to represent the world with words,
images, and drawings (representational ability)
- child does not perform operations (reversible mental
actions that allow them to do mentally what they can
do physically)
- children uses more symbols (internalized sensory
image or word that represents an event)
PIAGET: PREOPERATIONAL STAGE
Substages:
1. Symbolic Function Substage
- between ages 2 to 4
- child gains the ability to use mental representations (symbols) to which a child has attached meaning
- Ex. Pretend play (play involving imaginary people and situations)
PIAGET: PREOPERATIONAL STAGE
Substages:
1. Symbolic Function Substage
Limitations:
a. Egocentrism – inability to consider another person’s point of view
Ex. The three-mountain task (Piaget and Inhelder, 1969)
PREOPERATIONAL STAGE
Substages:
1. Symbolic Function Substage
Limitations:
b. Animism – tendency to attribute life to objects that are not alive
- “The sun is shy.”
- “The TV is tired.”
- “That tree pushed the leaf off, and it fell down.”
3/1/2014
3
PREOPERATIONAL STAGE
Substages:
2. Intuitive Thought Substage
- around ages 4 to 7
- child begins to use primitive reasoning
- child wants to know the answers to all sorts of questions
- intuitive � child knows something but knows it without the use of rational thinking
PREOPERATIONAL STAGE
Centration
– centering of attention on one
characteristic to the exclusion
of all others
- another limitation of the
preoperational stage
- clearly demonstrated in the
child’s lack of conservation
PREOPERATIONAL STAGE
Conservation
- Awareness that two things
that are equal remain equal
even if the appearance is
altered, as long as nothing is
added or taken away
- Children in the preoperational
stage tend to lack
conservation
- Example: Piaget’s beaker test
THEORY OF MIND
Theory of mind - awareness of one’s own mental
processes and those of others
• 2-3 years old: Children begin to understand the
following:
a.) perceptions of others
b.) differences between positive & negative emotions
c.) the concept of desire
• 4-5 years old: Children can understand that the mind
can represent objects accurately or inaccurately
- They realize that people can have false beliefs
CONCRETE OPERATIONAL STAGE
• Concrete operational stage (7-11 years old)
- children can now perform concrete operations (reversible mental actions that apply to real, concrete objects)
- child develops logical thinking, but not abstract thinking
- less egocentric thinking
CONCRETE OPERATIONAL STAGE
Concrete Operations:
1. Conservation – in the beaker test, the child is able to re-imagine the water in the original beaker
2. Classification – child can divide things into different sets and consider how they are related to one another
3/1/2014
4
CONCRETE OPERATIONAL STAGE
Concrete Operations:
3. Seriation – arranging
stimuli according to a
certain dimension (e.g.
color, length)
4. Transitivity – ability to
logically combine
relations to understand
certain conclusions
PIAGET:
FORMAL OPERATIONAL STAGE• Formal operational stage
(11 years old and onwards)
- individual is now capable of
doing abstract thought
- individuals are now able to
think of make-believe
situations and develop
hypothetical scenarios
- adolescents become more
idealistic
PIAGET:
FORMAL OPERATIONAL STAGEKey Abilities:
1. Abstract thinking
2. Idealistic thinking – extended
speculation about ideal
characteristics
3. Logical thinking
a. Hypothetical-deductive
reasoning
– ability to develop, consider,
and test a hypothesis
(Example: “Pinoy Henyo”)
BEYOND PIAGET:
ADOLESCENT EGOCENTRISM
• Adolescent egocentrism
- David Elkind’s concept of
the heightened self-
consciousness of
adolescents
- for Elkind, this is partly
because the adolescent is
still starting to explore
his/her formal operational
thought
BEYOND PIAGET:
ADOLESCENT EGOCENTRISM
Key Components
(1)Imaginary audience –
adolescent’s belief that
others are as interested
in them as they
themselves
(2)Personal fable –
adolescent’s belief of
adolescents that they are
special
BEYOND PIAGET: COGNITIVE
DEVELOPMENT IN ADULTHOOD
• Reflective thinking –continuous, active evaluation of information in light of new evidence and implications; may develop at around ages 20-25
• Postformal thought –mature thinking that relies on emotion, intuition, and logic to deal with a chaotic and uncertain world
3/1/2014
5
CRITICISM OF PIAGET’S THEORY
1. Some cognitive abilities emerge earlier than
Piaget thought.
2. Some abilities appear in earlier stages.
3. Some children can be trained to reason at a
higher cognitive stage.
4. Culture may play a role in how their skills
develop.
VYGOTSKY’S SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY
- For Vygotsky, children learn through social contexts and social interaction
Zone of proximal development (ZPD)
- gap between what they are able to do by themselves and what they are not ready to accomplish by themselves
- the “buds” of development, as opposed to the “fruits”
VYGOTSKY’S SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY
Scaffolding
- temporary support given to a
child to do the task until
he/she can do it alone
- a more skilled person
(teacher or adult) adjusts the
amount of guidance to fit the
child’s current performance
VYGOTSKY’S SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY
Private speech
- talking to oneself with no intent
to communicate with others
• Piaget: Private speech is
egocentric and immature
- Children tend to vocalize what is
on their minds
- They could not distinguish the
words and the actions they
symbolize
EGOCENTRIC
SPEECH
SOCIAL SPEECH
INNER SPEECH
Awareness of others
Awareness of others
VYGOTSKY’S SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY
Private speech
• Vygotsky: Private speech is
an important tool of
thought
- It is important in the
transition from social speech
to inner speech
- It serves as a transition
towards internal control of
behavior
EXTERNAL
SOCIAL SPEECH
PRIVATE SPEECH
INNER SPEECH
Internalization
Internalization
CRITICISM OF VYGOTSKY’S THEORY
1. Overemphasis of the role of language on
thinking
2. Facilitators might become too helpful in
some cases
3. Children might become lazy and expect help
when they could do it on their own
3/1/2014
6
KOHLBERG:
MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
Moral development – development of thoughts,
feelings, and behaviors about what people should do
Piaget: Children undergo two stages of morality:
1. Heteronomous morality (4-7 years old)
– rules are fixed and people can’t control it
- believes in immanent justice (if a rule is broken,
punishment will be given right away)
2. Transition (7-10 years old)
3. Autonomous morality (10 years old and
beyond)
– rules are created by people; in judging an action,
the intentions and the consequences must be
considered
KOHLBERG: MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
LEVEL I:
Preconventional
Moral decisions are based on consequences.
(Ages 4-10)
Stage 1: Obedience
and Punishment
Orientation
Moral decisions are based on fear of
punishment.
Stage 2: Individualism
and Exchange
Moral decisions are based on self-interest and
what others can do for them.
LEVEL II: Conventional Moral decisions are based on standards of
authority figures. (Ages 10-13 or beyond)
Stage 3: Good
interpersonal
relationships
Moral decisions are based on desire to please
others.
Stage 4: Maintaining
social order
Moral decisions are based on one’s sense of
duty to maintain law and order.
KOHLBERG: MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY
LEVEL III: Post-
conventional
Moral decisions are based on one’s own
principles and convictions. (Adolescence,
adulthood, or never)
Stage 5: Social
contract and
individual rights
Moral decisions are based on respect for one’s
values, rights, and dignity, even if contrary to
the law.
Stage 6: Universal
Ethical Principles
Moral decisions are based on one’s
personalized conscience, even if contrary to
the law.
KOHLBERG: MORAL DEVELOPMENT
Criticisms
1. Moral thoughts: Too focused on
moral thoughts and little focus on
moral behavior.
2. Culture: May not apply to
nonwestern cultures, especially if
it emphasizes communal equity
and collective happiness
3. Parents: Never considered parents
as important to moral
development; for him, it limits the
child’s perspective
KOHLBERG: MORAL DEVELOPMENT
4. Gender:
- Carol Gilligan says that Kohlberg’s
theory is more focused on men and
puts more focus on abstract thoughts
over relationships with others
- Rather than a justice perspective
(focused on the rights of the
individual), Gilligan says that women
make moral decisions based on a care
perspective (focused on
connectedness with others)
- Research shows no evidence of
male bias in Kohlberg’s theory