problems in mhd reconnection ?? (cambridge, aug 3, 2004) eric priest st andrews

69
Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Upload: elisabeth-shepherd

Post on 05-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004)

Eric PriestSt Andrews

Page 2: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. 2D Reconnection

3. 3D Reconnection

4. [Solar Flares]

5. Coronal Heating

Page 3: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

1. INTRODUCTION

Reconnection is a fundamental process in a plasma: Changes the topology

Converts magnetic energy to heat/K.E

Accelerates fast particles

In solar system --> dynamic processes:

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 4: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Magnetosphere

Reconnection -- at magnetopause (FTE’s)& in tail (substorms) [Birn]

Page 5: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Solar Corona

Reconnection key role inSolar flares, CME’s [Forbes] +

Coronal heating

Page 6: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Induction Equation∂B

∂ t= ∇ × (v × B) + η∇2B + ......

B changes due to transport + diffusion

[Drake, Hesse, Pritchett]

Rm>>1 in most of Universe -->

B frozen to plasma -- keeps its energy

Except SINGULARITIES -- & j & E large ∇B

Heat, particle accelern

Page 7: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Current Sheets - how form ?

Driven by motions

At null points

Occur spontaneously

By resistive instability in sheared field

Along separatrices

By eruptive instability or nonequilibrium

In many cases shown in 2D but ?? in 3D

Page 8: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

2. 2D RECONNECTION

In 2D theory well developed : * (i) Slow Sweet-Parker Reconnection (1958) * (ii) Fast Petschek Reconnection (1964) * (iii) Many other fast regimes -- depend on b.c.'s

Almost-Uniform (1986) Nonuniform (1992)

In 2D takes place only at an X-Point-- Current very large-- Strong dissipation allows field-lines to break

/ change connectivity

Page 9: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Sweet-Parker (1958)

Simple current sheet

- uniform inflow

Mass conservation: L v i = l vo

Advection / diffusion: v i = η / l

Accelerate along sheet: vo = vA

Rmi =L vA

η,

Recon. Rate M i =v i

vAi

=1

Rmi1/ 2

Page 10: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Petschek (1964)

SP sheet small - bifurcates

Slow shocks- most of energy

M e =ve

vA

8 log Rm e

≈ 0.1

Reconnection speed ve --

any rate up to maximum

Page 11: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

?? Effect of Boundary Conditions on Steady Reconnection

NB - lessons:

3. Global ideal environment depends on bc’s

5. Maximum rate depends on bc’s

1. Bc’s are crucial

2. Local behaviour is universal - Sweet-Parker layer

4. Reconnection rate - the rate at which you drive it

Page 12: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Newer Generation of Fast Regimes Depend on b.c.’s

Almost uniform Nonuniform

Petschek is one particular case -

ηcan occur if enhanced in diff. region

Theory agrees w numerical expts if bc’s same

Page 13: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Nature of inflow affects regime

Converging Diverging

Me =f

Rme1/ 2

-> Flux Pileup regime

Same scale as SP, but different f,

different inflow Collless models w. Hall effect (GEM, Birn, Drake) ->

fast reconnection - rate = 0.1 vA

Page 14: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

2D - Questions ? 2D mostly understood

But -- ? effect of outflow bc’s -

-- fast-mode MHD characteristic

-- effect of environment

Is nonlinear development of tmi understood ??

Linking variety of external regions to collisionless

diffusion region ?? [Drake, Hesse, Pritchett, Bhattee]

Page 15: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

3. 3D RECONNECTION

Simplest B = (x, y, -2z)

Spine Field LineFan Surface

(i) Structure of Null Point

Many New Features

2 families of field lines through null point:

Page 16: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Most generally, near a Null (Neukirch…)

Bx = x + (q-J) y/2, By = (q+J) x/2 + p y,

Bz = j y - (p+1) z,

in terms of parameters p, q, J (spine), j (fan)

J --> twist in fan, j --> angle spine/fan

Page 17: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(ii) Topology of Fields - Complex

In 2D -- Separatrix curves

In 3D -- Separatrix surfaces

-- intersect in Separator

Page 18: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

transfers flux from one 2D region to another.

In 3D, reconnection at separator

transfers flux from one 3D region to another.

In 2D, reconnection at X

Page 19: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

? Reveal structure of complex field ? plot a few arbitrary B lines

E.g.

2 unbalanced sources

SKELETON -- set of nulls, separatrices -- from fans

Page 20: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

2 Unbalanced Sources

Skeleton:

null + spine + fan

(separatrix dome)

Page 21: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Three-Source Topologies

Page 22: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Simplest configuration w. separator:

Sources, nulls, fans -> separator

Page 23: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Looking Down on Structure

Bifurcations from one state to another

Page 24: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Movie of Bifurcations

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Separate --

Touching --

Enclosed

Page 25: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Higher-Order Behaviour

Multiple separators

Coronal null points

[? more realistic models corona: Longcope, Maclean]

Page 26: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(iii) 3D Reconnection

At Null -- 3 Types of Reconnection:

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Can occur at a null point (antiparallel merging ??)

or in absence of null (component merging ??)

Spine reconnection Fan reconnection

[Pontin, Hornig]

Separator reconnection[Longcope, Galsgaard]

Page 27: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Spine ReconnectionAssume kinematic, steady,

ideal. Impose B = (x, y, -2z)Solve E + v x B = 0 and curl E = 0 for v and E.

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

--> E = grad FB.grad F = 0, v = ExB/B2

-> Singularity at Spine

Impose continuous flow on lateral boundary across fan

Page 28: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Fan Reconnection

(kinematic)

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Impose continuous flow on top/bottom boundary

across spine

[? Resolve singularities,

? Properties:

Pontin, Hornig, Galsgaard]

Page 29: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Separator Reconnection

(Longcope)

Numerical: Galsgaard & Parnell

Page 30: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

In Absence of NullQualitative model - generalise Sweet Parker.

2 Tubes inclined at :

ϑ

Reconnection Rate (local):

Varies with - max when antiparl

ϑ

Numerical expts: (i) Sheet can fragment

(ii) Role of magnetic helicity€

v i =vA

Rmi1/ 2 [2 sin 1

2ϑ ]1/ 2

Page 31: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Numerical Expt (Linton & Priest)

3D pseudo-spectral code, 2563 modes.

Impose initial stagn-pt flow

v = vA/30

Rm = 5600

Isosurfaces of B2:

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 32: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

B-Lines for 1 Tube

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.Colour shows

locations of strong Ep

stronger Ep

Final twist

π

Page 33: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Features

Reconnection fragments (cf Parnell & Galsgaard)

F 2 = 2 ×Φ

2πF 2

∴Φ=π

Complex twisting/ braiding created

Initial mutual helicity = final self helicity

Higher Rm -> more reconnection locations & braiding

Approx conservation of magnetic helicity:

? keep as tubes / add twist: Linton

Page 34: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(iv) Nature of B-line velocities (w)

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressorare needed to see this picture.In 2D

Inside D, w exists everywhere except at X-point.

(E + w × B = 0)

Flux tubes rejoin perfectly

B-lines change connections at X

Outside diffusion region (D), v = w

[Hornig, Pontin]

Page 35: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

In 3D : w does not exist for an isolated diffusion region (D)

∃ i.e., no solution for w to

E + w × B = 0

fieldlines continually change their connections in D

(1,2,3 different B-lines)

flux tubes split, flip and in general do not rejoin

perfectly !

Page 36: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Locally 3D Example

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Tubes

split

&

flip

Page 37: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Fully 3D Example

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Tubes split & flip -- but

don’t rejoin perfectly

Page 38: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

3D - Questions ? Topology - nature of complex coronal fields ?

[Longcope, Maclean]

Spine, fan, separator reconnection - models ??[Galsgaard, Hornig, Pontin]

Non-null reconnection - details ??[Linton]

Basic features 3D reconnection such as nature w ?[Hornig, Pontin]

Page 39: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

4. FLARE - OVERALL PICTURE

Magnetic tube twisted - erupts -

Qmagnetic catastrophe/instabilitydrives reconnection

Page 40: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Reconnection heats loops/ribbons

[Forbes]

- rise / separate

Page 41: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

5. HOW is CORONA HEATED ?

Bright Pts,

Loops,

Holes

Recon-nection likely

Page 42: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Reconnection can Heat Corona:

(i) Drive Simple Recon. at Null by photc. motions --> X-ray bright point (Parnell)

(ii) Binary Reconnection -- motion of 2 sources (iii) Separator Reconnection -- complex B (iv) Braiding (v) Coronal Tectonics

Page 43: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(ii) Binary Reconnection (P and Longcope)

Many magnetic sources in solar surface Relative motion of 2 sources -- "binary" interaction Suppose unbalanced and connected --> Skeleton

Move sources --> "Binary" Reconnection Flux constant - - but individual B-lines reconnect

Page 44: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Cartoon Movie (Binary Recon.)

Potential B

Rotate one source about

another

Page 45: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(iii) Separator Reconnection[Longcope, Galsgaard]

Relative motion of 2 sources in solar surface Initially unconnectedInitial state of numerical expt. (Galsgaard & Parnell)

Page 46: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Comput. Expt. (Parnell / Galsgaard

Magnetic field lines -- red and yellow

Strong current

Velocity isosurface

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 47: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(iv) Braiding

Parker’s Model

Initial B uniform / motions braiding

Page 48: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Numerical Experiment (Galsgaard)Current sheets grow --> turb. recon.

Page 49: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Current Fluctuations

Heating localised in space --

Impulsive in time

QuickTime™ and aVideo decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 50: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(v) CORONAL TECTONICS ? Effect on Coronal Heating of

“Magnetic Carpet”

* (I) Magnetic sources in surface are concentrated

Page 51: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

* (II) Flux Sources Highly Dynamic Magnetogram movie (white +ve , black -ve)

QuickTime™ and aVideo decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Sequence is repeated 4 times Flux emerges ... cancels Reprocessed very quickly (14 hrs !!!)? Effect of structure/motion of carpet on Heating

Page 52: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Life of Magnetic Flux in Surface

(a) 90% flux in Quiet Sun emerges as ephemeral regions

(b) Each pole migrates to boundary, fragments --> 10 "network elements" (3x1018 Mx)

(c) -- move along boundary -- cancel

Page 53: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

From observed magnetograms

- construct coronal field

lines - statistical properties: most close low down

Time for all field lines to reconnect

only 1.5 hours

(Close, Parnell, Priest):

- each source connected to 8 others

Page 54: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Coronal Tectonics Model(Priest, Heyvaerts & Title)

Each "Loop" --> surface in many sources Flux from each source topology distinct -- Separated by separatrix surfaces

Corona filled w. myriads of separatrix/ separator J sheets, heating impulsively

As sources move, coronal fields slip ("Tectonics") --> J sheets on separatrices & separators

--> Reconnect --> Heat

Page 55: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Fundamental Flux Units

Intense tubes (B -- 1200 G, 100 km, 3 x 1017 Mx)

100 sources

10 finer loops

not Network Elements

Each network element -- 10 intense tubes Single ephemeral region (XBP) --

Each TRACE Loop --

80 seprs, 160 sepces

800 seprs, 1600 sepces

Page 56: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Theory Parker -- uniform B -- 2 planes -- complex motions Tectonics -- array tubes (sources) -- simple motions

(a) 2.5 D Model

Calculate equilibria -- Move sources --> Find new f-f equilibria

--> Current sheets and heating

Page 57: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

3 D Model

Demonstrate sheet formation

Estimate heating

Preliminary numerical expt. (Galsgaard, Mellor …)

Page 58: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Results Heating uniform along separatrixElementary (sub-telc) tube heated uniformly

But 95% photc. flux closes low down in carpet-- remaining 5% forms large-scale connections --> Carpet heated more than large-scale corona

So unresolved observations of coronal loops--> Enhanced heat near feet in carpet --> Upper parts large-scale loops heated uniformly & less strongly

Page 59: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

6. CONCLUSIONS 2D recon - many fast regimes - depend on nature inflow

Reconnection on Sun crucial role - * Solar flares * Coronal heating

3D - can occur with or without nulls - several regimes (spine, fan, separator)- sheet can fragment - role of twist/braiding- concept of single field-line vely replaced- field lines continually change connections in D- tubes split, flip, don’t rejoin perfectly

Page 60: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

?? Extra Questions ??

? Threshold / conditions for onset of reconnection

? Occur equally easily at nulls or without

? Rate and partition of energy

? How does reconnection accelerate particles -

cf DC electric fields, stochastic accn, shocks

? Determines where non-null recon. occurs

? Role of microscopic processes

Page 61: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

PS-Example from SOHO (EIT - 1.5 MK)

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Eruption

Inflow to reconnection site

Rising loops that have cooled

(Yokoyama)

Page 62: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Example from TRACE

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Eruption

Rising loops

Overlying current sheet (30 MK) with downflowing plasma

Page 63: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

(Priest and Schrijver 1999)

Reconnection proceeds

New loopsform

Old loops cool

Page 64: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

PS-B-Lines for 1 Tube

Page 65: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

PS-Cause of Eruption

?Magnetic

Catastrophe

2.5 D Model

Page 66: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Numerical Model

Suggestive of

Catastrophe

Page 67: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

PS- Reconn - Elegant Explanation for many Recent Space Observations

Yohkoh

Hottest loops are cusps or interacting loops X-ray jets - accelerated by reconnection

SOHO X-ray bright points (NIXT, EIT, TRACE)

Magnetic carpet (MDI) Explosive events (SUMER)

Nanoflares (EIT, TRACE, CDS)

Page 68: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

TRACE Loop

Reaches to surface in

many footpoints.

Separatrices & Separators form web in

corona

Page 69: Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews

Corona - Myriads Different LoopsEach flux element --> many neighbours

But in practice each source has 8 connections