problem sfilename: problem set 1.pdfet 1

4
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology TKT 4198 Structural Design – Advanced Course Problem Set 1 Delivery Deadline: Sunday 20/09/2015

Upload: haldor8

Post on 07-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


10 download

DESCRIPTION

Filename: Problem Set 1.pdf

TRANSCRIPT

NTNU

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

TKT 4198

Structural Design – Advanced Course

Problem Set 1

Delivery Deadline: Sunday 20/09/2015

1 Load combinations A beam of span 11l m is loaded with the following uniformly distributed loads:

Characteristic value Partial safety factors

Self-weight 1k steelg A (where A is the beam

cross section)

sup 1.35

0.85

G

Permanent load 2 5k

kNg

m

Variable load 14k

kNs

m

0

1

2

1.50

0.7

0.4

0.0

Q

a) Calculate the ULS design load (use equations 6.10a and 6.10b of Eurocode0); b) Calculate the SLS design loads for the Characteristic, Frequent and Quasi-permanent

situations.

2 ULS design forces and SLS maximum displacements The beam is restrained at both ends by elastic rotational springs (see figure below). The stiffness of

the springs is:

410kNm

krad

a) Determine symbolically the formulas for the bending moment in A and C and for the

displacement in C (these depends on k , l , q and EI )

b) Choose the beam cross section (among IPE profiles) so to have: o enough capacity at ULS (bending moment and shear) and

o SLS displacements (characteristic load comb.) within the limit / 250l . c) Verify the beam at ULS and SLS:

o Calculate the bending moment at ULS in A, B and C and verify that the cross section selected is strong enough;

o Calculate the shear force at ULS in A and B and verify that the cross section selected is strong enough;

o Calculate the reactions forces at ULS in A and B.

o Calculate the maximum displacement of C at SLS (Characteristic load combination) and verify that the displacements are within the requirements

d) Question: which configurations are obtained with 0k and k ? Maximum bending moment and displacements for these two configurations are determined by well-known formulas. Check that the formula found in point a) converge to these solutions when

0k and k . e) With the section you have selected:

o Determine the minimum stiffness of the springs, mink , that guarantees the SLS

mid-span displacement to be within the limit;

o Determine the “optimum stiffness” of the springs, optk , i.e. the stiffness that gives

sagging moment equal to hogging moment , ,Ed A Ed CM M (at ULS)

3 Design of the joints Consider the beam considered in points 1 and 2 to be bolted to vertical columns (cross section

HEB300) at both ends. The joints are typical bolted beam-to-column joints with end plates. The

number of bolts is fixed to 6 and these are distributed in 3 rows. A sketch of the joint is presented

below.

a) Assuming the beam to be fixed-fixed, design the joint so to have enough capacity at ULS. In detail:

a. define the bolt dimension and location (use bolt quality 8.8); b. define the end plate geometry; c. define the welds between beam and the end plate; d. perform the required checks among those listed in Table 6.1 of Eurocode 3 Part

1.8. e. produce technical drawings (by hand or with cad) of the joint.

4 Additional data: Standards:

Eurocode 0 and Eurocode 3 shall be used. For nationally determined parameters use the

Norwegian National Annex.

Steel quality S355:

0

1

2

355

1.05

1.05

1.2

210

yk

m

m

m

f MPa

E GPa

Cross section properties:

Use standard IPE sections. Properties are cross-section geometry are available in many catalogue

or websites (e.g.

http://www.staticstools.eu/profil_IPE.php?profil=IPE180&act=zobraz&lang=EN&je=0)

5 Hints Make use of excel or software like Mathcad or SMath Studio since the design of these

types of joints is done in an “iterative way”. Hand calculations may require longer time since new calculations shall be performed each time a modification is performed. Moreover, this problem will be continued in Problem set 2.

Use notation as in Eurocodes 0 and 3 strictly. This gives advantages in applying Eurocodes’ formulas, avoids strange names for variables and is a good habit to learn for easier the reading of your calculations by other people.

Write references of all main formula used (references to book and/or standards);

Similar joints are designed/checked in some of the books given as references, in particular Per Kr. Larsen’s book.