principles of fraud examination...principles of fraud examination author andi mcneal created date...
TRANSCRIPT
-
© 2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
Principles of Fraud
Examination
Legal Issues
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 2 of 27
Practical Problem
After reading John Wilson’s personnel file and
discovering the remittance advices, you decide to
go through his desk to see if there is anything to
indicate that he is involved in a fraud. You notice
that Wilson’s computer has been left on. The
company has a networked computer system,
including interoffice email, to which Wilson has an
account. Also, you do a directory search on his
desktop and discover that within the word
processing program there is a subdirectory
named “W&W” that is completely unrelated to the
Jolie Company.
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 3 of 27
Practical Problem
Questions:
1. Does the information known thus far give you
predication to take further steps in the
examination?
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 4 of 27
Rights and Duties of Employees
▪ Duty to cooperate:
• So long as what is required is reasonable
▪ Contractual rights
▪ Whistleblowers:
• Protection against retaliatory action for making
protected disclosure
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 5 of 27
Employees’ Constitutional or
Fundamental Rights
▪ U.S. Constitutional rights:
• Fourth Amendment—search and seizure
• Fifth Amendment—right to remain silent
• Sixth Amendment—right to counsel
▪ European Convention of Human Rights:
• Article 8(1)—right to respect for private life and
correspondence
• Article 6—right to fair trial
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 6 of 27
Practical Problem
Questions:
2. Can you legally search Wilson’s desk? If so,
what items can you examine?
3. One of the drawers is locked; can you open it
without his permission?
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 7 of 27
Employees’ Privacy Rights
▪ United States—Generally, the Fourth
Amendment does not apply to private
employers.
• But the Fourth Amendment still has implications for
private industry via law suits for invasion of privacy.
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 8 of 27
Employees’ Privacy Rights
▪ The reasonable expectation of privacy:
• Is it free from intrusion?
• What circumstances indicate this expectation?
▪ Does the employee have this expectation in
the area searched?
▪ Does the employee have exclusive control?
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 9 of 27
Practical Problem
Questions:
4. Can you look at or copy the contents of the
“W&W” directory on his computer? Can you
seize the computer and take it with you?
5. Can you read his email? Why or why not?
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 10 of 27
Practical Problem
Questions:
6. What steps could Wilson’s employer take to
lower employees’ expectations of privacy in the
workplace?
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 11 of 27
Policies Regarding Workplace
Privacy and Searches
▪ Notify the employee that desks, office, email
communications, computer, etc., are subject to
search:
• Within legal environs
▪ Notification process should be continuous.
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 12 of 27
Investigations
▪ Right to investigate is
implicit:
• No special authority is
required.
▪ A fraud examiner may:
• Interview witnesses.
• Gather evidence.
• Collect and review
documents.
• Examine public records.
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 13 of 27
Defamation
▪ Untrue statement of fact:
• Not opinion
▪ Published to third parties
▪ Unprivileged occasion:
• Absolute
• Conditional
▪ Damaging to reputation
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 14 of 27
Violation of Individuals’ Privacy
▪ Publicity of private facts:
• Unreasonable publicity to true, but private,
information:
• Publicized broadly
• Private facts
• Highly offensive to reasonable person
• Speaker does not have legitimate interest
▪ Intrusion upon seclusion:
• Intentional intrusion into plaintiff’s solitude
• Intrusion must be highly offensive to reasonable
person
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 15 of 27
False Imprisonment
▪ Restraint of freedom:
• Locking the interview room
• Standing in front of an exit
• Refusing to let the suspect leave
-
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 16 of 27
Electronic Discovery
▪ It is a process of collecting evidence pertaining
to litigation from information system.
▪ Must establish document retention policy.
▪ Litigation hold procedures suspend any
destruction of potential evidence.