pricing freight transport to account for external costs

18
Congressional Budget Office Pricing Freight Transport to Account for External Costs 2016 Allied Social Science Associations Meetings San Francisco, California January 3, 2016 David Austin, Microeconomic Studies Division The information in this presentation is preliminary and is being circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment as developmental work for analysis for the Congress. For additional information, see David Austin, Pricing Freight Transport to Account for External Costs, Working Paper 2015-03 (Congressional Budget Office, March 2015), www.cbo.gov/publication/50049.

Upload: congressional-budget-office

Post on 21-Apr-2017

1.905 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

CongressionalBudgetOffice

PricingFreightTransporttoAccountforExternalCosts

2016AlliedSocialScienceAssociationsMeetingsSanFrancisco,California

January3,2016

DavidAustin,MicroeconomicStudiesDivision

TheinformationinthispresentationispreliminaryandisbeingcirculatedtostimulatediscussionandcriticalcommentasdevelopmentalworkforanalysisfortheCongress.Foradditionalinformation,seeDavidAustin,PricingFreightTransporttoAccountforExternalCosts,WorkingPaper2015-03(CongressionalBudgetOffice,March2015),www.cbo.gov/publication/50049.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 2

WhatThisProjectAddresses

■ Externalcostsoffreighttransportincludetheeffectsofaccidents,damagetoroads,airpollution,trafficcongestion,andemissionsofcarbondioxide.

■ Ifsuchexternalcostsweretaxed,howwouldthechoiceofmodeoftransportation—truckvs.rail—beaffected?

■ Towhatextentareresources(includinginfrastructure)misallocatedbecausepricesdonotreflectallcosts?

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 3

TypicalExternalCostsMayBeEightTimesHigherforTransportbyTruckThanbyRail

TypeofCost Truck Rail

AccidentRisk 0.8to2.3 0.1to0.25

PavementDamage 0.7to1.0 0.05to0.06

Particulates+NOx 0.6to0.8 0.1to0.2

TrafficCongestion 0.4to0.9 0to0.03

CO2 0.02to0.22to0.9 0.01to0.05to0.2

TotalofMedianCosts 4.0 0.5

2014CentsPerTon-Mile

Note:FordamagesfromCO2,threenumbersareshowntodescribethedistributionofestimatesofexternalcosts;valuestowardthemiddleoftherangearemuchmorelikelytobeselected.Forothersourcesofexternalcosts,twonumbersareshown;allofthevaluesintherangeareequallylikelytobeselected.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 4

PoliciestoReflectExternalCostsinTransportPricesWouldShiftSomeShippingFromTrucktoRail

Addingexternalcoststoshippingrateswouldincreaseshippingcostsforbothmodes.Externalcostsfortrucksaregreater.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 5

OutlineoftheApproach

■ Constructeconomicmodelofmode-choiceresponsetochangesinshippingcosts– Modelisbasedonobservedpriceelasticitiesbymodeandcommodity

■ Initialconditions:Truck,railmarketshares(ton-miles)from2007FreightAnalysisFramework(FAF)data

■ Experiment:Changetransportpricesbyaddingexternalcosts(astaxes)torateschargedbytruckandrailcarriers

■ Outcomespredictedbyrepeatedsimulationofthemodel:– Changesinton-milesforeachmode– Reductionsinexternalcosts– Taxrevenuegeneratedbyeachpolicy

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 6

FourPolicyOptions

■ Average-external-cost(AEC)tax– Aweight-distancetaxonaveragecostsperton-mile,fromaccidents,pavementdamage,

trafficcongestionplusafueltaxonNOx,PM,CO2emissions

– Truckingtaxrates:2.3¢perton-mile,$1.50pergallon– Railtaxrates:0.3¢perton-mile,$1.50pergallon

■ Adistancetax(vehiclemilestraveled,orVMT,tax)plusafueltax– Truckingtaxrates:30¢permile,$1.50pergallon– Railtaxrates:12¢permile,$1.50pergallon

■ VMTtaxonly

■ Fueltaxonly

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 7

WhoWillorWillNotSwitchModes?

■ Shipperswhoonlyweaklyprefertruckingtorailwillswitchwhenrelativepriceschange.

■ Manyshipperswillnotswitchevenifpriceschangesubstantially.– Shippersforwhomonlyonemodeisavailable– Shippersforwhomonemodeisideallysuited(truckshippersinmarkets

whererailserviceissloworsporadicandbulk-commodityshippers)

■ Onthemargin,ashipperwillswitchdependingonhowmuchthetaxaffectstruckingprices,onapercentagebasis,relativetorailprices.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 8

AverageShippingRates,2007

TypeofService Truck Rail

Carload/Truckload 14.6 4.7

Bulk 13.6 3.5

Intermodal 17.4 5.6

AutoTransport 13.8 9.6

EstimatedAverageCentsperTon-mileMeasuredinConstant2014Dollars

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 9

OverviewofFindings:AECTax

■ Theratiooftrucktorailexternalcostsis8:1.

■ TheAECtaxhasamuchsmallereffectonrelativeprices.– Shipperswillingtopaymorefortrucktransportthanforrail– Newtaxisinadditiontoexistingtaxesondieselfuel

■ ThereisanaveragepredictedincreaseinshippingcostsfromtheAECtax.– Trucks:19%– Rail:12%

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 10

OverviewofFindings:AECTax(Continued)

■ Predictedeffectsvarybycommodityandroute.– Littleeffectforshort-haul(mostlytruck)andbulktransport(mostlyrail)

■ Thereisa3.6%overallpredictedshiftinton-milesfromtrucktorail,0.8%declineintotaltonsshipped.

■ Thereare3millionfewertrucktripsand0.8millionmorerailcartripsin2007underthesimulatedpolicythanunderexistingpolicy.– Dieselfuelsavingsofalmost700milliongallons– Roughly$2billionreductioninexternalcosts

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 11

ResultsThatWouldHaveOccurredin2007UndertheFourPolicyOptions

AECTaxVMTTaxPlus

FuelTax

VMTTax

FuelTax

AverageCostIncrease,Rail(Percent) 12.1 15.9 10.1 5.9

AverageCostIncrease,Truck(Percent) 18.9 19.3 12.6 6.6

ShiftinTon-MilesFromTrucktoRail(Percent) 3.6 3.9 3.8 0.8

ReductioninTotalTonsShipped(Percent) -0.8 -0.7 -0.5 -0.3

ReductioninNumberofTruckTrips(Millions) -3.2 -3.3 -2.7 -0.9

IncreaseintheNumberofRailcarTrips(Millions) 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.2

GallonsofFuelSaved(Millions) 669 696 623 176

ReductioninExternalCosts(Billionsofdollars) 2.3 2.4 2.1 0.6

RevenuesFromtheTaxin2007(Billionsofdollars) 68 70 43 26

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 12

DiscussionofFindings

■ TheeffectsoftheVMTtaxplusthefueltaxaregenerallyalittlelargerthanthoseoftheAECtax.– TheAECtaxisamoreaccuratereflectionofexternalcosts.– Byignoringweight,theVMTtaxishigheronlightershipmentsand

loweronheaviershipments,comparedwithataxonweightanddistance.

– Thedrawbackisatrade-offforloweradministrativecosts.

■ Byitself,theVMTtaxhaseffectsnearlyaslargeasthecombinationofVMTtaxplusfueltax,butitraises$27billionlessinrevenues.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 13

LikelyRangeofOutcomesandSensitivityAnalysis

SensitivityAnalysisBasedonAlternativeModelParameters

PolicyEffect

AECTax(Averageresult)

LikelyRange

DoubleRailAccidentRisk

NoDrayageorLiftCosts

AlternateElasticitie

s

ReduceTruck

Ratesby5%

RaiseTruck

Ratesby5%

ChangeinExternalCosts(Percent) -3.3 -3.0to-3.5 -2.0 -3.7 -2.7 -3.6 -3.0FuelSavings(Percent) 2.9 2.6to3.2 2.0 3.3 2.5 3.2 2.6ShiftinTon-MilesFromTrucktoRail(Percent) 3.6 3.4to3.8 2.1 4.1 2.9 4.1 3.2ReductioninTonsShipped(Percent) -0.8 -0.8to-0.8 -0.8 -1.0 -0.8 -0.8 -0.7ReductionintheNumberofTruckTrips(Millions) -3.2 -3.1to-3.3 -2.5 -4.7 -3.0 -3.4 -3.0IncreaseintheNumberofRailcarTrips(Millions) 0.8 0.8to0.8 0.5 1.1 0.5 0.9 0.7

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 14

LikelyRangeofOutcomesandSensitivityAnalysis(Continued)

■ Resultsarebasedon1,000iterationsofthesimulationmodel.

■ Variationinmodelpredictionsoverthoseiterationsissummarizedasthe“likelyrange”ofvaluesthatthemodeledoutcomesmighttake.– Thatrangeisdefinedascontainingtwo-thirdsofthemodel’s

predictions,centeredonthemedianprediction.

■ Theinfluenceofindividualparametersonthemodel’spredictionsisexaminedbyvaryingtheparameters’values.– Manyofthosesensitivitytestsyieldpredictionsthatlieslightlyoutside

ofthelikelyrange.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 15

DataandParameters

■ Theunitofobservationforfreightshippingistotalton-milesandtonsshippedin2007.– Bystatepair,eachof39commodities,andtwotransportmodes– Almost76,000observations– DatacomefromtheFreightAnalysisFramework,basedprimarilyonthe

2007CommodityFlowSurvey

■ Themodel’sparametersarespecifiedasrangesofpossiblevalues.– Shippingrates,drayagecosts,transportshareofproductionand

distributioncosts,demandelasticities,railroutecircuity,emptyreturns,taxpass-through,andpayloadcapacities

■ Insimulations,aspecificvalueisdrawnatrandomfromeachparameter’sspecifiedrange.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 16

Mode-ChoiceElasticities

Commodity Rail-TruckElasticity

BulkCommodities/RawMaterialsBulkFarmProducts 0.02to0.03BulkFoodProducts 0.6to0.8LumberandWood 0.6to0.7PulpandPaper 0.7to0.9BulkChemicals 0.5to0.7PrimaryMetals 1.2to1.5WasteandScrap 0.17to0.22AllOtherBulk 0.14to0.19

FinishedGoodsFinishedFarmProducts 3.5to3.7FinishedFoodProducts 2.0to2.2Furniture 4.0to4.7FinishedChemicals 3.2to3.5FabricatedMetals 5.2to7.3Machinery 3.7to4.8ElectricalMachinery 4.1to4.8MotorVehicles 0.2to0.3MotorVehicleParts 1.1to1.4AllOtherFinished 3.9to4.5

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 17

AlternativestotheAECTax

■ Amongthepolicyoptionsanalyzed,theAECtaxmostaccuratelyreflectsexternalcosts,butitwouldbethemostcostlytoadminister.– Thegovernmentmustknowtheweightanddistanceofeveryshipment.

■ TheVMTtaxrequiresdistanceonly,notweight.

■ Thefueltaxisleastcostlytoadminister.– Acollectionmechanismisalreadyinplace.

■ TheVMTandfueltaxeshaveloweradministrativecostsbutreflectexternalcostslessaccuratelyorlesscomprehensively.– Thepolicysimulationsexaminetheimportanceofthattrade-off.

CONGRESSIONALBUDGETOFFICE 18

SourcesforNumericValues

■ Externalcosts– Particulates/NOx:Matthewsetal.,J.InfrastructureSystems(2001)– CO2:InteragencyWorkingGrouponSocialCostofCarbon(2014)

– Allotherexternalcosts:GovernmentAccountabilityOffice(2011)

■ Carrierrates(pricesperton-mile)– DepartmentofTransportation,SurfaceTransportationBoard,andCongressional

BudgetOffice

■ Mode-choiceelasticities– Jones,Nix,andSchwier(1990),from“NCHRPReport388:AGuidebookfor

ForecastingFreightTransportationDemand,”TransportationResearchBoard(1997)

■ Ton-milesoffreightshippedin2007– FreightAnalysisFramework,basedontheCommodityFlowSurvey