he
raises.
My
obligations
are
many
and
great
these
problems
will
states
1
that
his
purpose
is
to
inquire
into
the
original,
certainty,
and
extent
problem
is
through
experience
that
bodies
are
heavy
and
consequently
fall,
if
their
supports
passage
(Introduction,
thing,
for
necessity
means
the
necessity
of
we think
there
is
contradiction
in
asserting
Still
the
figure
in a
a
given
weight,
progress
in
physics.
The
examples
of
mathematics
and
physics
suggest,
according
to
Kant,
that
metaphysics
go
on,
as
we
must,
;
problem,
given
in
outline
in
the
Preface,
is
undeniably
plausible.
Yet
examina
supposes.
Advance
in
1
Cf.
pp.
101-2.
preserve
the
parallel,
is
impossible
may
nature
of
mistake
by
a
momentary
change
priori.
This
pro
suggested
by
mathematics,
inasmuch
as
the
mathematician
pre
supposes
that
particular
objects
must
correspond
to
the
general
rules
discovered
by
a meta
physical presupposition
are
then
only
reaches
a
correspond
to
their
objects,
to the
problem
relates
which
we
apprehend
in
the
resulting
judgement
by
the
fact
 
cussion of the
treatment,
though
causality
some
universal.
Thus,
in
versal.
least have had
the
perception
and
its
conceptions
any
time
the
physical
originate
the
principles
underlying
physics.
Again,
if
the
account
general
question
How
are
a
priori
synthetic
basis
for
distinguishing
the
Aesthetic
and
the
Analytic,
kinds of
urge
that
Kant
afterwards
points
out
that
space
as
an
object
pre
supposes
a
synthesis
firstly
conception.
(3)
first,
speaks
of
space
not
only
sensation.
form
of
phenomena.
5
Moreover,
if
accept
more to
is
opposed
is
is
said
representation
of
a
body
As has been
apprehend
empty
space.
objects
in
space
than
that
there
is
no
space.
If,
on
the
other
hand,
represent
or
principle
on
uses. But
if this
the individual
not,
as
they
should,
that
space
space
there
from
infinity
of
spaces
may
infinite
number
of
spaces
the
properties
of
space
synthetically
and
yet
a
priori.
propositions
can
be
deduced
which
matics
at
once
gives
us
and
highest
con
object
of
conception
means
the
a
priori
presentation
construction,
perception
in
itself,
between
my
representation
and
the
object
question
empirical,
but
only
its
form,
viz.
space
truth
of
geometrical
judgements
presupposes
a
perception
of
empty
space,
in
virtue
thing
merely
perceive empty
whether it
is not
priori
and
empirical
judgements.
For
the
necessity
of
connexion,
e.
g.
be
tween
being
a
three-sided
figure
and
being
a
three-
angled
figure,
concerned
with
the
things
as
they
are
our
perceiving
nature
that,
when
ever
we
perceive
an
object
as
a
three-sided
figure,
the
object
as
perceived
contains
three
angles,
it
follows
that
any
object
as
perceived
will
conform
to
this
law
that
what
we
judge
is
the
true
law
conscious
to
be
expected
from
his
formulation
us
as
perceiving,
though
not
in
reality.
1
to be
of
something,
though
not
of
things
in
themselves.
How,
then,
but
he
obtains
an
assertion
which
transition,
in
argument appeals.
conclusion, then,
to know
things
as
they
are
in
themselves
in
the
two
things,
unknown,
nature of
Even
the
term
convergent
terms
appear
at
all ?
Moreover,
this
implication
illu
drawing
it.
We
understand
perfectly
why
a sensitive
appear
in
con
difficulty
in
made
is
spatial.
The
term
there is
the
difficulty
existence of
cube,
of
perspective
eliminated
a
cube
as
it
is,
a
thing
really
is
it
is,
independently
of
a
percipient,
that
spatial
relations
we
actually
sensuous elements
must
allow
that
reality
is
spatial,
since,
that it falls within
passage
is,
positions
with
regard
character of
reflect,
we
always
presuppose
that
space
only
argument
thinking.
These
of
time
and
the
They may
be ascribed
power
of
being-
affected
temporally
related,
is
a
way
in
show
that,
in
order
to
prove
that
complex
was
groping
was
that
knower
and
advantages.
exists
in
this
independence.
must
in
The
true
reason
for
asserting
feeling
and
of the
than
that
of
knowledge.
We
should
say,
for
instance,
that
by
taking
into
account
relation
by
way
of
knowledge
nature
kind
called
mental.
Hence,
solely
of
reality
of
which
other kind.
sensations
which
may
be
called
appearances.
For
only
sensations
or
combinations
that
ledge,
1
Cf.
pp.
89-91.
1
This
assertion,
being
self-evident,
the
mind,
being
only
a
metaphorical
expression
thing
independent
of
the
mind,
as
opposed
first,
and
conse
quently
always
actually
knew,
but
simply
realities of
of
reality
capable
of
being
related
inseparable
sides
, and,
consequently,
capable
of
entering
into
it
essentially
the
parallel
of
relative
term,
possible
that
knowledge
and
reality
or,
speaking
more
strictly,
a
knower
and
reality,
are
related
which
it
bounds,
does
not
either
come
to
be,
or
persist,
or
cease.
only
charac
teristics
of
perception
and
knowledge
thinking
or
representing.
Further,
of
our
perceived
or
known.
Consequently,
that between
the
reality
approach
in
thought
to
various
parts
thinking
perception
spatial.
2
He
means,
not
that
space
things
perceived,
which
something
represented
or
perceived
not
of
external
phenomena,
and
(2)
that
Here
representa
tions
He
remembers
appearances
by
space
of
outer
and
clearly
aware,
time
also
belongs
first
question
of
the
Critique
propounded
changes
take
place
according
cause
that which would
the
judgements
of
mathematics.
We
may
now
consider
of
the
understanding
to
judgements,
so
that
passage.
Three
points
in
volved,
perception
is
not
really
compatible
For the
conception,
the
activity
of
judgement
third
answers
should
be
rejected
in
favour
unity
judgements.
The
judgement,
as
Kant
describes
it,
always
differentiations
of
judgement.
judge
ment
are
to
originate
does not even
judgement
chapter.
of
necessary
succession
between
the
to
reality
subject
by
adding
an
important
link
in
the
argument,
1
but
the
importance
of
the
conception
can
apply,
isolated data of sensation
notation
adopted
can
be
counted.
scribed
the
faculty
of
judgement,
3
faculty
of
judgement
or
thought,
it
unifies
an
empirical
account
be
covered
by
analysis
of
the
manifold.
Thus
thought
as
studied
by
Formal
Logic
standing
same
spontaneity
imagination,
the
sense
in
which
the
passage
under
discussion
might
at
first
sight
lead
us
to
suppose.
We
by raising
much
in
respect
corresponding
to
synthesis
to another
desire to
manifold
are
parts
principles
makes
them
parts
them,
some
degree
conscious
is
the
special
principle
4
by
which
the
ness
of
the
manifold
Similarly
in
appealing
constitute
a
whole,
as
lacking
the
unity
which
only
fold
gradually
perceived
and
then
reproduced
into
one
representation
of
what
,
between
phenomena
and
things
in
themselves,
There
is,
however,
another
point
can
say
something
knowledge
an
object
in
general,
meaning
whatever
in
saying
an
idea
representation
by
conscious
ness.
2
combination of
which
make
the
unity
of
apperception
possible,
and
the
conception
represent
to
myself
the
object
x,
i.
same
whether
unified
parts
unified
on
thing
in
itself
space.
Moreover,
it
that
they
the
principles
of
synthesis
involved
by
the
phenomenal
object
are
usually
thought
of
by
presupposition
sensibility
self-consciousness.
time
conscious
of
the
identity
the
thought.
Hitherto,
Kant
identity throughout
its manifold
process,
from
the
point
of
view
of
the
representations
combined,
hand,
it
does
perceptions
would
belong
of the
argument.
The
approach
reference.
4
This
possibility
of
a
priori
have
representa
ipso
be
given,
would
perceive;
our
understanding
can
only
think
priori
Kant is anxious to
subject
of
all
our
representations.
To
do
this,
sciousness
presupposes
the
synthesis
features
of
the
argu
implied
analytical
unity
of
apperception
as
an
affec
am
are
merely
to
be
apprehensions
can
ourselves as the identical
form
unity.
2
C
apprehension
conscious
ness
of
our
identity,
particular
principles
of
synthesis
required
for
particular
these
represen
tations
to
the
very
same
representations
experience
conception
as
something
opposed
to
a
perception,
i.
the
criti
the
events
more or less
categories
one
world
of
nature.
Moreover,
it
might
be
added
that
these
suppositions
are
justified,
and of
possible
synthetic
unity
and
BC
contiguous.
1
Similarly,
given,
possible objection,
not be known.
be
tributed
by
the
understanding
as
relations,
is
really
confusing
the
terms with
two
as
consisting
in
relating
these
data.
In
the
second
place,
by
distinguishing
the
imagination
from
aware
that
object,
produced by
there,
if
be
inexplicable.
For
if
the
synthesis
consists
in
literal
construction,
object
that,
while
relatedness
at
all,
and
manifold,
and
of
a
process
by
which
it
has
been
produced
its
meaning
must
object
ought
not
to
refer
both
whole
the
produced,
terms
of
something
else.
word.
In
the
second
place,
fundamental
reality,
of an
subsequently
to
perception,
1
Now,
if
it
be
granted
that
is
the
important
one
that,
whatever
due to our
that
our
world,
facts
not
quite
obviously
connected,
something
conditions,
/such,
for
instance,
as
System of
effect. The Deduction
transcendental
problem
arises,
How
is
it
possible
three
points.
In
the
first
place,
the
schema
is
a
conception
or
appre
hension.
In
character
istics
purpose.
For
firstly,
an
individual
group
of
100
(homo
geneous
elements).
Accordingly,
concrete than
in
as
Kant
describes
it,
by
two
in
2
1
p.
246.
2
a
necessary
ante
existence,
group
to
indi
perception.
Thirdly,
it
need
not
appeal
to
space
and
time
as
not
justified,
since
a
sensation
called
an
object
of
perception.
The
anticipation
of
sense-perception
is
negation
as a
feel
some
misgiving
general
theory,
as
being
inconsistent
way.
"
There
of
colours,
1
B.
217,
colours,
so
of
the
different
shades
of
the
same
colour,
that
general
remarks
l
on
the
subject,
is
the
base of
phenomena,
possibility
of
all
synthetic
unity
of
sense-perceptions,
that
is,
of
experience,
and
in
this
permanent
permanent
in
question
succession
of
of two
analogy
gies.
What
he
says
suggests
(1)
apprehension
of
the
in
isolation,
we
come
to
apprehend
them
as
temporally
related.
The
deduction
of
the
second
and
third
analogies
argues
that
the
principles
of
causality
and
reciprocal
his deduction
of the
will
grant.
But,
so
soon
a
complex
of
representations.
for
the
very
realities
of
passage
under
discussion,
two
2
Since
(that
which
precedes)
according
way
alone
can
"If
we
suppose
that
appre
hensions
is
irreversible
or,
in
other
words,
is
manifold
of
the
phenomenon,
according
to
which
the
apprehension
of
the
one
(that
which
happens)
follows
event
by
determining
A was neces
succession
pick
out
the
indifference.
We
may
now
turn
to
elements,
viz.
of
events
in
nature,
and
boat or
of the
experience
forced
us
event
determine
which
body
really
moved.
Two
remarks
may
be
causality
in
this
way
is
to
pursue
the
dogmatic
method
of
arguing
transcendent-
ally,
or
principle.
For
if,
perceive
time
itself,
the
proof
necessary
succession
of
reciprocal sequence
as not
trinsic
importance.
unperceived
state
be
possible,
actual,
or
necessary
centaur,
object
figure
necessary,
and,
therefore,
actual,
and
possible.
if
there
are
three-sided
space
know
things
in
themselves,
this
is
the
space
is
not
even,
as
Descartes
contends,
doubtful.
To
prove
this
he