pricewaterhousecoopers llp pwc independent study into school leadership john lakin national union...
TRANSCRIPT
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PwC Independent Study into School Leadership
John Lakin
National Union of Teachers The Future of School Leadership conference, 1st May 2007
Slide 2 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
OutlineOutline
• Terms of reference• Approach• Key findings• Recommendations• Conclusions
Slide 3 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
What we were asked to examine… our terms of reference
Provide a comprehensive and independent account of existing, emerging and potential models of school leadership, including• roles and responsibilities• governance• reward and contractual arrangements• career paths• recruitment and succession• support staff• lessons from other sectors
Slide 4 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
What we did… our approach
Literature review(100+ documents)
Stakeholder interviews (50+ interviews)
Survey of school leaders(3,000+ respondents)
Focus groups with teachers
(100+ participants)
School visits(50 schools)
Methodology
Slide 5 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Some of our key findings…
• More complex and demanding role• ‘Hero head’ model is redundant• Need for greater distributed leadership• Leaders think they distribute leadership well, but their staff
don’t always agree• Work-life balance is more important than pay• Behaviours matter more than structures• Clear moves towards flatter, wider management structures• No ‘one size fits all’ solutions
Slide 6 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
What is effective leadership (from Ofsted reports)?
• A clear vision based on pupil need• Accurate and on-going self-evaluation • Carefully designed structures and distributed leadership • Well-developed succession planning • Well-informed and active governing bodies • A holistic approach to managing diverse workforces• Protection of the ‘strategic space’
Slide 7 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Views on effective leadership (from ‘the led’)
Characteristics of effective leadersFor support staff, effective leaders… For teachers, effective leaders…
•Recognise and value the work of others •Are visible and approachable
•Communicate fully and effectively with all staff •Are supportive
•Define roles and responsibilities clearly •Have an in-depth knowledge of the school and of the wider community
•Provide development opportunities •Are interested in wider issues rather than just results
•Adopt an open, consultative approach •Understand classroom practice
•Are visible •Are non-hierarchical and consultative
•Have a constructive approach to performance management
•Distribute leadership effectively
•Act and feedback on concerns raised •Act and feedback on concerns raised
Slide 8 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Some key future leadership skills
• Change management• Financial management• People management• Buildings and project management• Stakeholder management and interpersonal skills• Managing extended services
Slide 9 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Models of leadership
• The traditional model• Managed models• Multi-agency managed• Federated models• System leadership
Slide 10 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
The Chief Executive/ non QTS leader debate
For• No legal requirement at present • Reflects changing role of school
leadership• Widens leadership talent pool to all
school staff and beyond• Examples in other sectors and
countries• Opens up other ways of
addressing professional leadership• Supported by some teacher
associations
Against• No current examples in UK• Devalues primacy of teaching and
learning• Non QTS talent pool lacks
credibility• Schools are unique and evidence
from elsewhere mixed• Professional and operational
leadership cannot be divorced• Not supported by majority of
existing heads/teachers
Slide 11 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Recommendations - overview
Rationalising the policy landscape
Building capacity – enabling the sector to distribute leadership
Modernising governance and accountability
Promoting diverse school structures
Winning hearts and minds
Rewarding the sector for distributed leadership behaviours
Slide 12 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Rationalising the policy landscape
Key findings
• Leaders continue to feel frustrated with the pace and complexity of policy change
Number of initiativesMandatory vs voluntaryCross-sectoral dimension (i.e.
educational and social)Tensions between initiatives
Recommendations
• DfES to engage sector better on design and communication of policy initiatives
Strengthen limiting mechanismsClarity between mandatory/advisory‘Sense checking’ of resources
• Regular mapping exercise of bureaucratic burden to balance increases against reductions
• Promote measures that recognise wider contributions of schools
Extended provision/social outcomesCollaboration/ multi-agency working
• Promote voice of parents and learners at all levels
Slide 13 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Promoting more diverse school structures
Key findings
• Traditional hierarchical structures not sustainable
• One size does not fit all • Disproportionate pressure on small schools• Clear evidence of innovative emerging
structures
Recommendations
• Publish and promote new modelsVia simple guideIncorporating NCSL materials
• Develop national programme of support for new models
Working with NCSLPump prime innovative models
• Remove legal and regulatory barriersExecutive headsOther innovative structures
• Carry out longer term evaluations of new models
Slide 14 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Modernising governance and accountability
Key findings
• Lack of capacity/skills in governing bodies• Lack of clarity, and some inconsistencies,
around accountability for school leaders within ECM context
Recommendations
• Review governance to considerSize, composition and skill mixHow employers can increase poolAggregation of governing bodiesImpact of multi-agency agendasFormalising pro bono
contributions
• Provide guidance on roles of governors
Strategic involvementWider accountabilitiesExtended services
Slide 15 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Building capacity
Key findings
• Professional qualifications overly restrictive and do not necessarily reflect complexity of new environment
• Recruitment issues at all levels• Burgeoning workload – in large part due to
ECM agenda• Lack of career progression opportunities for
non-teaching professionals
Recommendations
• Promote diversity/succession planning in the sector
Shorten time from QTS to headshipEncourage BME/female candidatesSupport ‘system leadership’Consider non QTS professionalsPilot rotation of leaders
• Adopt new approach to qualificationsReview NPQH content and deliveryAccredit other relevant learningInvest in ongoing developmentLeadership training for support staffMentoring and support post NPQH
• Expand development opportunitiesExchanges, secondments,
shadowingValuing and requiring continuing
CPDFunding CPD for leadersIncreasing e-learning opportunities
Slide 16 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Winning hearts and minds
Key findings
• Traditional approach and conservatism predominates in the sector:
SchoolsGovernors/LAsParents/public
Recommendations
• Develop a communications strategyDescribe changing landscapeExplain benefits of new modelsChallenge attitudes/expectationsAttract new talent
Slide 17 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Rewarding the sector
Key findings
• Pay levels not the main issue• Pay framework out of line, in a number of
respects, with policy framework• Some issues around differentials
Recommendations
• Maintain the existing pay frameworkModification not radical change
• Reward new roles and performanceExecutive headsSystem leadershipSupport staff in leadership
positionsSTRB to oversee all school staffUse of balanced scorecardGuidance on existing flexibilities
• Review differentialsBetween different size schoolsBetween sectorsBetween deputies and assistants
Slide 18 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Conclusion
• A broad-ranging package of measures to support existing and future school leaders, without being prescriptive
• Focuses on building capacity and distributed leadership within schools to better manage change and make the job more ‘doable’
• Contains challenges for all parties, including government• Provides an evidence base from which others can draw• Provides a possible programme of action, in whole or in part
Slide 19 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
This presentation is based on the PwC Independent Report into School Leadership which was prepared for and only for DfES in accordance with the terms of our engagement letter dated April 2006 and for no other party and/or purpose. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not accept or assume any liability or duty of care for any other purpose for which this report may be used or in relation to any other third party or other person(s) or organisation(s), who may read and/or rely on this report, save where expressly agreed in writing with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
© 2007 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. ‘PricewaterhouseCoopers’ refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (a limited liability partnership in the United Kingdom) or, as the context requires, other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
John Lakin (tel: 020 7213 5872, email: [email protected])
David Armstrong (tel: 02890 415176, email: [email protected])
Report and technical annexes available at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR818A.pdf
PwC Contacts