presummer-03 tce comparison report liz consuelo ...lizr/liz rangel teaching comparison...
TRANSCRIPT
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
16753-00
9/24/2008
FIRST SEMESTER SPANISHLEC031101SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Presummer-03
-
2,916 185 2,300
SPANSLLS
Enrollment: Sections:
small class, fewer than 20 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Lower Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 213
SPANSLL0
Enrollment:
(100%)Response: 14
Enrollment : 14
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Summer and Winter
1. - 4.30 4.99 4.5 4.44 - 4.44 4.54- 4.54 4.5 4.6 0.63Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 3
10 71%
0% 0%
21% 7%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.84 4.73 4.0 3.98 - 3.96 4.10- 4.10 4.0 4.3 0.83Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 4 7 50%
0% 0%
29% 21%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.16 4.98 4.1 4.03 - 4.03 4.15- 4.14 4.1 4.6 0.76Amount learned
0 0
2 2
10 71%
0% 0%
14% 14%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.04 4.96 4.2 4.13 - 4.12 4.26- 4.26 4.2 4.5 0.85Overall instructor comparison
0 0
3 1
10 71%
0% 0%
7% 21%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.16 4.98 4.4 4.33 - 4.32 4.43- 4.42 4.4 4.6 0.76Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
2 2
10 71%
0% 0%
14% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.02 4.84 4.1 4.07 - 4.06 4.17- 4.17 4.1 4.4 0.76Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
2 4 8 57%
0% 0%
29% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.22 4.92 4.2 4.13 - 4.12 4.23- 4.23 4.2 4.6 0.65Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
1 4 9 64%
0% 0%
29% 7%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.24 5.00 4.7 4.64 - 4.64 4.73- 4.72 4.7 4.6 0.74Students treated with respect
0 0
2 1
11 79%
0% 0%
7% 14%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.38 4.05 3.7 3.64 - 3.64 3.77- 3.76 3.7 3.7 0.61Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
5 8 1 7%
0% 0%
57% 36%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.22 4.92 4.3 4.22 - 4.21 4.33- 4.32 4.3 4.6 0.65Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 4 9 64%
0% 0%
29% 7%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:117)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
00079-00
9/24/2008
FIRST SEMESTER SPANISHLEC851101SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Winter-02
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(86%)Response: 12
Enrollment : 14
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 4.36 5.00 -- 4.8 0.62Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 1
10 83%
0% 0%
8% 8%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.58 4.59 -- 4.1 0.79Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 5 4 33%
0% 0%
42% 25%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.57 4.76 -- 4.2 0.94Amount learned
1 0
1 5 5 42%
0% 8%
42% 8%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.70 4.80 -- 4.3 0.87Overall instructor comparison
0 0
3 3 6 50%
0% 0%
25% 25%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.36 5.00 -- 4.8 0.62Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
1 1
10 83%
0% 0%
8% 8%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.25 5.00 -- 4.7 0.65Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
1 2 9 75%
0% 0%
17% 8%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.35 4.98 -- 4.7 0.49Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
0 4 8 67%
0% 0%
33% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.10 5.00 -- 4.7 0.89Students treated with respect
1 0
0 1
10 83%
0% 8%
8% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.46 4.04 -- 3.8 0.45Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
3 9 0 0%
0% 0%
75% 25%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.36 5.00 -- 4.8 0.62Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 1
10 83%
0% 0%
8% 8%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:117)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
66399-01
9/24/2008
FIRST SEMESTER SPANISHLEC851101SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Winter-04
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(100%)Response: 13
Enrollment : 13
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 4.77 5.00 -- 4.9 0.28Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 1
12 92%
0% 0%
8% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.24 4.83 -- 4.5 0.52Overall rating of the course
0 0
0 6 7 54%
0% 0%
46% 0%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.43 5.00 -- 4.8 0.60Amount learned
0 0
1 1
11 85%
0% 0%
8% 8%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.33 4.90 -- 4.6 0.51Overall instructor comparison
0 0
0 5 8 62%
0% 0%
38% 0%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.52 5.00 -- 4.8 0.44Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 3
10 77%
0% 0%
23% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.52 5.00 -- 4.8 0.44Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
0 3
10 77%
0% 0%
23% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.52 5.00 -- 4.8 0.44Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
0 3
10 77%
0% 0%
23% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 5.00 5.00 -- 5.0 0.00Students treated with respect
0 0
0 0
13 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.36 4.18 -- 3.8 0.73Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
5 6 2 15%
0% 0%
46% 38%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.77 5.00 -- 4.9 0.28Value of time spent on course
0 0
0 1
12 92%
0% 0%
8% 0%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:117)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
77279-00
9/24/2008
THIRD SEMESTER SPANISHLEC851201SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Winter-07
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(100%)Response: 8
Enrollment : 8
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 5.00 5.00 -- 5.0 0.00Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 0 8 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.24 5.00 -- 4.6 0.52Overall rating of the course
0 0
0 3 5 63%
0% 0%
38% 0%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.24 5.00 -- 4.6 0.52Amount learned
0 0
0 3 5 63%
0% 0%
38% 0%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.41 5.00 -- 4.8 0.46Overall instructor comparison
0 0
0 2 6 75%
0% 0%
25% 0%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.41 5.00 -- 4.8 0.46Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 2 6 75%
0% 0%
25% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.24 5.00 -- 4.6 0.52Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
0 3 5 63%
0% 0%
38% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.41 5.00 -- 4.8 0.46Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
0 2 6 75%
0% 0%
25% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 5.00 5.00 -- 5.0 0.00Students treated with respect
0 0
0 0 8 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.91 4.59 -- 4.3 0.46Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
0 6 2 25%
0% 0%
75% 0%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.10 4.90 -- 4.5 0.53Value of time spent on course
0 0
0 4 4 50%
0% 0%
50% 0%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:117)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
16227-00
9/24/2008
ADV GRAMMAR COMPOSITIONLEC001425SPANLIZ CONSUELO
SummerI-04
-
1,698 137 1,579
SPANSLUS
Enrollment: Sections:
small class, fewer than 20 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 142
SPANSLU0
Enrollment:
(100%)Response: 6
Enrollment : 6
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Summer and Winter
1. - 4.48 5.00 4.6 4.50 - 4.49 4.64- 4.64 4.6 4.8 0.41Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 1 5 83%
0% 0%
17% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.51 4.83 4.2 4.16 - 4.15 4.33- 4.34 4.2 4.2 0.75Overall rating of the course
0 0
1 3 2 33%
0% 0%
50% 17%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.45 4.55 4.2 4.12 - 4.11 4.27- 4.27 4.2 4.0 0.63Amount learned
0 0
1 4 1 17%
0% 0%
67% 17%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.77 5.00 4.3 4.17 - 4.16 4.34- 4.34 4.2 4.5 0.84Overall instructor comparison
0 0
1 1 4 67%
0% 0%
17% 17%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.48 5.00 4.5 4.46 - 4.46 4.59- 4.60 4.5 4.8 0.41Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 1 5 83%
0% 0%
17% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.21 5.00 4.4 4.28 - 4.27 4.42- 4.43 4.3 4.7 0.52Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
0 2 4 67%
0% 0%
33% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.48 5.00 4.4 4.28 - 4.27 4.42- 4.42 4.3 4.8 0.41Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
0 1 5 83%
0% 0%
17% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 5.00 5.00 4.8 4.70 - 4.70 4.81- 4.81 4.8 5.0 0.00Students treated with respect
0 0
0 0 6 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 2.81 3.52 3.4 3.38 - 3.39 3.51- 3.50 3.4 3.2 0.41Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
5 1 0 0%
0% 0%
17% 83%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.95 5.00 4.5 4.39 - 4.39 4.52- 4.52 4.5 4.7 0.82Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 0 5 83%
0% 0%
0% 17%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:117)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
38633-00
9/24/2008
ARTS POLITICS: LATIN AMLEC001103TRADLIZ CONSUELO
SummerII-05
-
3,793 159 1,885
TRADSLLS
Enrollment: Sections:
small class, fewer than 20 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
TRAD
Lower Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 238
TRADSLL0
Enrollment:
(100%)Response: 11
Enrollment : 11
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Summer and Winter
1. - 3.95 4.96 4.4 4.36 - 4.41 4.54- 4.46 4.5 4.5 0.82Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
2 2 7 64%
0% 0%
18% 18%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.64 4.72 4.1 3.99 - 4.06 4.20- 4.11 4.1 4.2 0.87Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 3 5 45%
0% 0%
27% 27%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.03 4.88 4.1 4.08 - 4.14 4.27- 4.19 4.2 4.5 0.69Amount learned
0 0
1 4 6 55%
0% 0%
36% 9%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.64 4.72 4.1 4.00 - 4.04 4.18- 4.12 4.1 4.2 0.87Overall instructor comparison
0 0
3 3 5 45%
0% 0%
27% 27%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.22 4.87 4.3 4.29 - 4.34 4.44- 4.38 4.4 4.5 0.52Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 5 6 55%
0% 0%
45% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.22 4.87 4.1 4.04 - 4.08 4.20- 4.14 4.1 4.5 0.52Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
0 5 6 55%
0% 0%
45% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.13 4.78 4.2 4.15 - 4.17 4.28- 4.24 4.2 4.5 0.52Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
0 6 5 45%
0% 0%
55% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.57 5.00 4.7 4.67 - 4.69 4.78- 4.74 4.7 4.8 0.40Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2 9 82%
0% 0%
18% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.03 3.88 3.1 3.09 - 3.06 3.17- 3.18 3.1 3.5 0.69Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
4 6 0 0%
0% 9%
55% 36%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.12 4.97 4.1 4.10 - 4.13 4.25- 4.20 4.2 4.5 0.69Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 3 7 64%
0% 0%
27% 9%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:117)203
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
18903-00
9/24/2008
ARTS POLITICS: LATIN AMLEC031103TRADLIZ CONSUELO
Presummer-05
-
3,793 159 1,885
TRADSLLS
Enrollment: Sections:
small class, fewer than 20 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
TRAD
Lower Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 238
TRADSLL0
Enrollment:
(94%)Response: 16
Enrollment : 17
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Summer and Winter
1. - 4.31 4.94 4.4 4.36 - 4.41 4.54- 4.46 4.5 4.6 0.62Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 4
11 69%
0% 0%
25% 6%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.68 4.57 4.1 3.99 - 4.06 4.20- 4.11 4.1 4.1 0.89Overall rating of the course
1 0
2 7 6 38%
0% 6%
44% 13%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.57 4.68 4.1 4.08 - 4.14 4.27- 4.19 4.2 4.1 1.09Amount learned
0 1
2 6 7 44%
6% 0%
38% 13%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.78 4.72 4.1 4.00 - 4.04 4.18- 4.12 4.1 4.3 0.93Overall instructor comparison
1 0
2 5 8 50%
0% 6%
31% 13%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.82 4.93 4.3 4.29 - 4.34 4.44- 4.38 4.4 4.4 1.09Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 1
1 4
10 63%
6% 0%
25% 6%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.07 4.56 4.1 4.04 - 4.08 4.20- 4.14 4.1 3.8 1.47Usefulness of the outside assignments
2 2
0 5 7 44%
13% 13%
31% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.95 5.00 4.2 4.15 - 4.17 4.28- 4.24 4.2 4.5 1.10Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 1
1 2
12 75%
6% 0%
13% 6%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.46 5.00 4.7 4.67 - 4.69 4.78- 4.74 4.7 4.8 0.58Students treated with respect
0 0
1 2
13 81%
0% 0%
13% 6%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 2.96 3.67 3.1 3.09 - 3.06 3.17- 3.18 3.1 3.3 0.70Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
10 4 1 6%
0% 6%
25% 63%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.28 4.72 4.1 4.10 - 4.13 4.25- 4.20 4.2 4.0 1.41Value of time spent on course
0 2
3 2 9 56%
13% 0%
13% 19%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:117)203
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
47929-01-02
9/24/2008
SECOND SEMESTER SPANISHLEC006102SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Spring-03
-
31,910 1,121 25,770
SPANALLM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Lower Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,434
SPANALL0
Enrollment:
(80%)Response: 20
Enrollment : 25
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.23 4.77 4.3 4.28 - 4.28 4.33- 4.33 4.3 4.5 0.61Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 8
11 55%
0% 0%
40% 5%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.35 3.95 3.9 3.87 - 3.86 3.92- 3.92 3.9 3.7 0.67Overall rating of the course
0 0
9 9 2 10%
0% 0%
45% 45%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.64 4.26 3.8 3.82 - 3.81 3.86- 3.87 3.8 4.0 0.69Amount learned
1 0
2 14
3 15%
0% 5%
70% 10%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.88 4.75 4.0 3.96 - 3.95 4.02- 4.02 4.0 4.3 0.95Overall instructor comparison
1 0
3 4
11 58%
0% 5%
21% 16%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.29 4.76 4.2 4.15 - 4.14 4.19- 4.19 4.2 4.5 0.51Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 9
10 53%
0% 0%
47% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.53 4.37 3.9 3.87 - 3.86 3.91- 3.91 3.9 3.9 0.91Usefulness of the outside assignments
2 0
2 10
5 26%
0% 11%
53% 11%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.92 4.50 4.0 4.02 - 4.03 4.07- 4.05 4.0 4.2 0.63Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
2 11
6 32%
0% 0%
58% 11%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.76 5.00 4.6 4.61 - 4.60 4.64- 4.64 4.6 4.9 0.31Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
18 90%
0% 0%
10% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.49 4.51 3.6 3.54 - 3.53 3.57- 3.57 3.6 4.0 1.12Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 1
3 7 8 40%
5% 5%
35% 15%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.96 4.60 4.1 4.03 - 4.02 4.07- 4.07 4.0 4.3 0.67Value of time spent on course
0 0
2 9 7 39%
0% 0%
50% 11%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
46779-01-02
9/24/2008
SECOND SEMESTER SPANISHLEC013102SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Spring-02
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(82%)Response: 18
Enrollment : 22
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 4.49 4.95 -- 4.7 0.46Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 5
13 72%
0% 0%
28% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.95 4.49 -- 4.2 0.55Overall rating of the course
0 0
1 12
5 28%
0% 0%
67% 6%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.95 4.61 -- 4.3 0.67Amount learned
0 0
2 9 7 39%
0% 0%
50% 11%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.25 4.86 -- 4.6 0.62Overall instructor comparison
0 0
1 6
11 61%
0% 0%
33% 6%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.30 4.81 -- 4.6 0.51Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 8
10 56%
0% 0%
44% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.19 4.81 -- 4.5 0.62Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
1 7
10 56%
0% 0%
39% 6%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.09 4.73 -- 4.4 0.62Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
1 8 8 47%
0% 0%
47% 6%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.57 4.99 -- 4.8 0.43Students treated with respect
0 0
0 4
14 78%
0% 0%
22% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.31 4.25 -- 3.8 0.94Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
7 5 5 28%
0% 6%
28% 39%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.15 4.79 -- 4.5 0.62Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 7 9 53%
0% 0%
41% 6%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
47943-01-02
9/24/2008
SECOND SEMESTER SPANISHLEC013102SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Spring-03
-
31,910 1,121 25,770
SPANALLM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Lower Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,434
SPANALL0
Enrollment:
(85%)Response: 22
Enrollment : 26
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.53 4.92 4.3 4.28 - 4.28 4.33- 4.33 4.3 4.7 0.46Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 6
16 73%
0% 0%
27% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.83 4.35 3.9 3.87 - 3.86 3.92- 3.92 3.9 4.1 0.61Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 14
5 23%
0% 0%
64% 14%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.98 4.65 3.8 3.82 - 3.81 3.86- 3.87 3.8 4.3 0.78Amount learned
0 0
4 7
11 50%
0% 0%
32% 18%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.48 4.89 4.0 3.96 - 3.95 4.02- 4.02 4.0 4.7 0.48Overall instructor comparison
0 0
0 7
15 68%
0% 0%
32% 0%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.38 4.81 4.2 4.15 - 4.14 4.19- 4.19 4.2 4.6 0.50Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 9
13 59%
0% 0%
41% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.00 4.54 3.9 3.87 - 3.86 3.91- 3.91 3.9 4.3 0.63Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
2 12
8 36%
0% 0%
55% 9%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.90 4.47 4.0 4.02 - 4.03 4.07- 4.05 4.0 4.2 0.66Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
3 12
7 32%
0% 0%
55% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.78 5.00 4.6 4.61 - 4.60 4.64- 4.64 4.6 4.9 0.29Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
20 91%
0% 0%
9% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.20 3.89 3.6 3.54 - 3.53 3.57- 3.57 3.6 3.5 0.80Difficulty level of the course (new order)
2 0
8 10
2 9%
0% 9%
45% 36%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.16 4.66 4.1 4.03 - 4.02 4.07- 4.07 4.0 4.4 0.59Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 11 10 45%
0% 0%
50% 5%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
50949-01-02
9/24/2008
FOURTH SEMESTER SPANISHLEC028202SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Spring-07
-
31,910 303 5,085
SPANALLS
Enrollment: Sections:
small class, fewer than 20 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Lower Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,434
SPANALL0
Enrollment:
(80%)Response: 12
Enrollment : 15
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.60 5.00 4.3 4.28 - 4.25 4.37- 4.33 4.3 4.8 0.39Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 2
10 83%
0% 0%
17% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.28 4.89 3.9 3.87 - 3.83 3.95- 3.92 3.9 4.6 0.51Overall rating of the course
0 0
0 5 7 58%
0% 0%
42% 0%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.95 4.89 3.8 3.82 - 3.83 3.93- 3.87 3.9 4.4 0.79Amount learned
0 0
2 3 7 58%
0% 0%
25% 17%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.48 5.00 4.0 3.96 - 3.93 4.07- 4.02 4.0 4.8 0.45Overall instructor comparison
0 0
0 3 9 75%
0% 0%
25% 0%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.38 4.96 4.2 4.15 - 4.14 4.24- 4.19 4.2 4.7 0.49Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 4 8 67%
0% 0%
33% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.10 4.90 3.9 3.87 - 3.86 3.95- 3.91 3.9 4.5 0.67Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
1 4 7 58%
0% 0%
33% 8%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.87 4.79 4.0 4.02 - 3.97 4.06- 4.05 4.0 4.3 0.78Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
2 4 6 50%
0% 0%
33% 17%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.75 5.00 4.6 4.61 - 4.58 4.67- 4.64 4.6 4.9 0.29Students treated with respect
0 0
0 1
11 92%
0% 0%
8% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.19 3.81 3.6 3.54 - 3.56 3.63- 3.57 3.6 3.5 0.52Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
6 6 0 0%
0% 0%
50% 50%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.87 4.79 4.1 4.03 - 4.03 4.12- 4.07 4.1 4.3 0.78Value of time spent on course
0 0
2 4 6 50%
0% 0%
33% 17%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
65757-01-02
9/24/2008
FOURTH SEMESTER SPANISHLEC791202SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Spring-07
-
31,910 303 5,085
SPANALLS
Enrollment: Sections:
small class, fewer than 20 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Lower Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,434
SPANALL0
Enrollment:
(78%)Response: 11
Enrollment : 14
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.32 4.95 4.3 4.28 - 4.25 4.37- 4.33 4.3 4.6 0.50Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 4 7 64%
0% 0%
36% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 2.89 4.38 3.9 3.87 - 3.83 3.95- 3.92 3.9 3.6 1.21Overall rating of the course
0 1
4 3 3 27%
9% 0%
27% 36%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.17 4.29 3.8 3.82 - 3.83 3.93- 3.87 3.9 3.7 0.90Amount learned
1 0
3 5 2 18%
0% 9%
45% 27%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.22 4.87 4.0 3.96 - 3.93 4.07- 4.02 4.0 4.5 0.52Overall instructor comparison
0 0
0 5 6 55%
0% 0%
45% 0%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.12 4.97 4.2 4.15 - 4.14 4.24- 4.19 4.2 4.5 0.69Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
1 3 7 64%
0% 0%
27% 9%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.65 4.90 3.9 3.87 - 3.86 3.95- 3.91 3.9 4.3 1.01Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 0
1 3 6 55%
0% 9%
27% 9%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.19 4.81 4.0 4.02 - 3.97 4.06- 4.05 4.0 4.0 1.25Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 1
1 4 4 40%
10% 0%
40% 10%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.72 5.00 4.6 4.61 - 4.58 4.67- 4.64 4.6 4.9 0.30Students treated with respect
0 0
0 1
10 91%
0% 0%
9% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.10 4.35 3.6 3.54 - 3.56 3.63- 3.57 3.6 3.7 1.01Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
4 3 3 27%
0% 9%
27% 36%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.72 4.65 4.1 4.03 - 4.03 4.12- 4.07 4.1 4.2 0.75Value of time spent on course
0 0
2 5 4 36%
0% 0%
45% 18%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
48693-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS001210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-03
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(70%)Response: 19
Enrollment : 27
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.48 5.00 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.7 0.56Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 3
15 79%
0% 0%
16% 5%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.89 4.64 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.3 0.81Overall rating of the course
0 0
4 6 9 47%
0% 0%
32% 21%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.83 4.69 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.3 0.93Amount learned
1 0
3 5
10 53%
0% 5%
26% 16%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.75 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.9 0.32Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
17 89%
0% 0%
11% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
49639-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS001210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-04
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(80%)Response: 20
Enrollment : 25
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.39 4.91 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.7 0.59Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 5
14 70%
0% 0%
25% 5%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.90 4.60 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.3 0.79Overall rating of the course
0 0
4 7 9 45%
0% 0%
35% 20%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.92 4.48 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.2 0.62Amount learned
0 0
2 12
6 30%
0% 0%
60% 10%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.13 4.87 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.5 0.83Students treated with respect
1 0
1 5
13 65%
0% 5%
25% 5%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
73783-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS001210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-02
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(62%)Response: 15
Enrollment : 24
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.54 5.00 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.8 0.43Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 3
11 79%
0% 0%
21% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.94 4.92 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.4 0.85Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 2 9 64%
0% 0%
14% 21%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.71 4.86 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.3 0.99Amount learned
1 0
2 3 8 57%
0% 7%
21% 14%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.77 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.9 0.27Students treated with respect
0 0
0 1
13 93%
0% 0%
7% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)36
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
48695-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS002210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-03
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(92%)Response: 23
Enrollment : 25
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.39 4.88 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.6 0.58Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 6
15 68%
0% 0%
27% 5%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.60 4.49 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.0 1.05Overall rating of the course
2 0
5 5
10 45%
0% 9%
23% 23%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.64 4.45 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.0 0.95Amount learned
2 0
3 9 8 36%
0% 9%
41% 14%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.59 4.96 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.8 0.43Students treated with respect
0 0
0 5
17 77%
0% 0%
23% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
49641-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS002210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-04
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(88%)Response: 22
Enrollment : 25
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 3.51 4.40 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.0 1.05Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 1
6 7 8 36%
5% 0%
32% 27%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.28 4.09 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 3.7 0.95Overall rating of the course
1 1
5 12
3 14%
5% 5%
55% 23%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.04 3.87 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 3.5 0.96Amount learned
2 1
7 10
2 9%
5% 9%
45% 32%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 3.66 4.70 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.2 1.22Students treated with respect
0 2
2 6
12 55%
9% 0%
27% 9%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
73785-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS002210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-02
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(46%)Response: 13
Enrollment : 28
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.14 4.94 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.5 0.66Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 4 8 62%
0% 0%
31% 8%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.74 4.88 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.3 0.95Overall rating of the course
1 0
1 4 7 54%
0% 8%
31% 8%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.40 4.44 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 3.9 0.86Amount learned
1 0
2 7 3 23%
0% 8%
54% 15%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.76 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.9 0.28Students treated with respect
0 0
0 1
12 92%
0% 0%
8% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)36
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
48697-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS003210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-03
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(75%)Response: 18
Enrollment : 24
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.11 4.78 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.4 0.70Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
2 6
10 56%
0% 0%
33% 11%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.79 4.54 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.2 0.79Overall rating of the course
0 0
4 7 7 39%
0% 0%
39% 22%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.79 4.43 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.1 0.68Amount learned
0 0
3 10
5 28%
0% 0%
56% 17%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.74 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.9 0.32Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
16 89%
0% 0%
11% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
49643-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS003210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-04
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(72%)Response: 18
Enrollment : 25
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.26 4.85 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.6 0.62Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 6
11 61%
0% 0%
33% 6%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.64 4.47 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.1 0.87Overall rating of the course
1 0
3 8 6 33%
0% 6%
44% 17%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.09 4.02 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 3.6 0.98Amount learned
3 0
5 7 3 17%
0% 17%
39% 28%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.74 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.9 0.32Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
16 89%
0% 0%
11% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
73787-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS003210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-02
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(45%)Response: 10
Enrollment : 22
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 5.00 5.00 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 5.0 0.00Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 0 9 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.44 5.00 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.8 0.44Overall rating of the course
0 0
0 2 7 78%
0% 0%
22% 0%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.79 4.88 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.3 0.71Amount learned
0 0
1 4 4 44%
0% 0%
44% 11%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 5.00 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 5.0 0.00Students treated with respect
0 0
0 0 9 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)36
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
48699-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS004210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-03
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(75%)Response: 18
Enrollment : 24
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.28 4.78 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.5 0.51Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 8 9 53%
0% 0%
47% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.82 4.53 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.2 0.73Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 8 6 35%
0% 0%
47% 18%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.74 4.38 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.1 0.66Amount learned
0 0
3 10
4 24%
0% 0%
59% 18%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.56 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.8 0.53Students treated with respect
0 0
1 1
15 88%
0% 0%
6% 6%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
49645-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS004210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-04
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(53%)Response: 14
Enrollment : 26
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.42 4.96 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.7 0.48Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 4 9 69%
0% 0%
31% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.72 4.56 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.1 0.77Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 6 5 36%
0% 0%
43% 21%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.53 4.61 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 4.1 1.00Amount learned
1 0
3 4 6 43%
0% 7%
29% 21%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.66 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 4.9 0.36Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
12 86%
0% 0%
14% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
73789-02
9/24/2008
LATIN AMERICA ON FILMDIS004210SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-02
-
981 39 966
SPANADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 40
SPANADW0
Enrollment:
(71%)Response: 17
Enrollment : 24
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.55 5.00 4.4 4.34 - 4.34 4.55- 4.55 4.4 4.8 0.53Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 1
15 88%
0% 0%
6% 6%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.86 4.73 4.0 3.90 - 3.90 4.11- 4.11 4.0 4.3 0.85Overall rating of the course
1 0
1 7 8 47%
0% 6%
41% 6%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.37 4.28 3.8 3.74 - 3.74 3.95- 3.95 3.8 3.8 0.88Amount learned
1 0
5 7 4 24%
0% 6%
41% 29%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 5.00 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.62 4.78- 4.78 4.7 5.0 0.00Students treated with respect
0 0
0 0
17 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)36
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
65327-01
9/24/2008
READING LITERARY GENRESLEC791350SPANLIZ CONSUELO
Spring-06
-
12,543 454 11,221
SPANALUM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
SPAN
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 543
SPANALU0
Enrollment:
(79%)Response: 19
Enrollment : 24
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 3.78 4.75 4.3 4.24 - 4.23 4.31- 4.32 4.3 4.3 1.05Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
2 0
2 4
11 58%
0% 11%
21% 11%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.46 4.33 3.9 3.89 - 3.87 3.96- 3.97 3.9 3.9 0.94Overall rating of the course
2 0
3 9 5 26%
0% 11%
47% 16%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.13 4.24 3.9 3.84 - 3.80 3.89- 3.92 3.8 3.7 1.20Amount learned
3 1
2 8 5 26%
5% 16%
42% 11%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.50 4.40 3.9 3.89 - 3.87 3.97- 3.98 3.9 3.9 0.97Overall instructor comparison
2 0
3 8 6 32%
0% 11%
42% 16%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.82 4.61 4.2 4.17 - 4.15 4.23- 4.24 4.2 4.2 0.85Usefulness of the in-class activities
1 0
2 8 8 42%
0% 5%
42% 11%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.46 4.33 4.0 4.01 - 3.99 4.06- 4.08 4.0 3.9 0.94Usefulness of the outside assignments
2 0
3 9 5 26%
0% 11%
47% 16%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.62 4.59 4.1 4.07 - 4.04 4.12- 4.14 4.1 4.1 1.05Usefulness of course materials (new question)
3 0
0 8 8 42%
0% 16%
42% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.05 5.00 4.6 4.60 - 4.59 4.65- 4.65 4.6 4.5 1.02Students treated with respect
0 1
1 3
14 74%
5% 0%
16% 5%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.49 4.20 3.5 3.48 - 3.45 3.52- 3.54 3.5 3.8 0.76Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
4 11
3 16%
0% 5%
58% 21%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.47 4.42 4.2 4.12 - 4.10 4.17- 4.19 4.1 3.9 1.03Value of time spent on course
2 0
4 6 7 37%
0% 11%
32% 21%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12345678910
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)232
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
54443-02
9/24/2008
ISS LATIN AM SOC POP CLDIS039104TRADLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-06
-
33,740 1,194 29,854
TRADADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
TRAD
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,415
TRADADW0
Enrollment:
(72%)Response: 16
Enrollment : 22
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.37 4.88 4.2 4.19 - 4.17 4.23- 4.24 4.2 4.6 0.50Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 6
10 63%
0% 0%
38% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.91 4.71 3.8 3.75 - 3.76 3.82- 3.81 3.8 4.3 0.79Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 5 8 50%
0% 0%
31% 19%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.01 4.79 3.8 3.73 - 3.72 3.78- 3.78 3.8 4.4 0.74Amount learned
0 0
2 5 8 53%
0% 0%
33% 13%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.68 5.00 4.7 4.64 - 4.64 4.67- 4.67 4.7 4.9 0.35Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
13 87%
0% 0%
13% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
54445-02
9/24/2008
ISS LATIN AM SOC+POP CLDIS040104TRADLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-06
-
33,740 1,194 29,854
TRADADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
TRAD
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,415
TRADADW0
Enrollment:
(78%)Response: 18
Enrollment : 23
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.44 4.90 4.2 4.19 - 4.17 4.23- 4.24 4.2 4.7 0.49Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 6
12 67%
0% 0%
33% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.22 4.89 3.8 3.75 - 3.76 3.82- 3.81 3.8 4.6 0.70Overall rating of the course
0 0
2 4
12 67%
0% 0%
22% 11%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.84 4.61 3.8 3.73 - 3.72 3.78- 3.78 3.8 4.2 0.81Amount learned
0 0
4 6 8 44%
0% 0%
33% 22%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.74 5.00 4.7 4.64 - 4.64 4.67- 4.67 4.7 4.9 0.32Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
16 89%
0% 0%
11% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
54447-02
9/24/2008
ISS LATIN AM SOC+POP CLDIS041104TRADLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-06
-
33,740 1,194 29,854
TRADADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
TRAD
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,415
TRADADW0
Enrollment:
(95%)Response: 20
Enrollment : 21
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.50 5.00 4.2 4.19 - 4.17 4.23- 4.24 4.2 4.8 0.55Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 3
16 80%
0% 0%
15% 5%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.29 4.91 3.8 3.75 - 3.76 3.82- 3.81 3.8 4.6 0.68Overall rating of the course
0 0
2 4
14 70%
0% 0%
20% 10%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.11 4.79 3.8 3.73 - 3.72 3.78- 3.78 3.8 4.5 0.76Amount learned
0 0
3 5
12 60%
0% 0%
25% 15%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.76 5.00 4.7 4.64 - 4.64 4.67- 4.67 4.7 4.9 0.31Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
18 90%
0% 0%
10% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
RANGEL TCE COMPARISON REPORT
54449-02
9/24/2008
ISS LATIN AM SOC+POP CLDIS042104TRADLIZ CONSUELO
Fall-06
-
33,740 1,194 29,854
TRADADWM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
TRAD
Undergraduate, Discussion
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 1,415
TRADADW0
Enrollment:
(69%)Response: 16
Enrollment : 23
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Discussion Section
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.18 4.82 4.2 4.19 - 4.17 4.23- 4.24 4.2 4.5 0.63Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 6 9 56%
0% 0%
38% 6%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.77 4.61 3.8 3.75 - 3.76 3.82- 3.81 3.8 4.2 0.83Overall rating of the course
0 0
4 5 7 44%
0% 0%
31% 25%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.91 4.46 3.8 3.73 - 3.72 3.78- 3.78 3.8 4.2 0.54Amount learned
0 0
1 11
4 25%
0% 0%
69% 6%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 4.61 5.00 4.7 4.64 - 4.64 4.67- 4.67 4.7 4.8 0.40Students treated with respect
0 0
0 3
13 81%
0% 0%
19% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 8
1238
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:138)236
