presidential scholars challengeorsp.kean.edu/internal/docs/presidential scholars... · web...

Presidential Scholars Challenge2011 Competition

Research Grant Request

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

1



PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

The Presidential Scholars Challenge (PSC) program is designed to provide seed or bridge funding for projects in areas important to the core initiatives of Kean University with the objective of securing external funding to continue a research program. One requirement of the grant is to write and submit a significant proposal for external funding during the grant period. For that reason, the PSC application process is modeled on the application processes of two major, potential external funding sources: the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), borrowing a little from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). Some of the requirements and instructions listed below are essentially the same as those of NSF and/or IES.

Format: single-spaced, one inch margins in all directions, Times New Roman typeface at 11 points or larger, paginated. All proposals must include the sections and subsections listed under “Proposal Contents” below. One hard copy with signed cover page must be submitted to your Dean by November 1, 2010. Prepare the text proposal using any word processing program and then convert those files to PDF. Electronic copies of the proposal and attachments (all as PDF files) and of the budget (Excel spreadsheet) must be sent as attachments to [email protected] by no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 1, 2010.

Applications not adhering to all proposal instructions will not be reviewed. There will be no opportunity to correct and resubmit for this competition.

OVERVIEW INFORMATION

Synopsis of Program The Presidential Scholars Challenge funds faculty research initiatives in areas important to the strategic vision and core initiatives of the University. The grant provides bridge support to faculty researchers who then pursue external funding during the grant period to continue their research program.

Anticipated Funding Amount Up to $500,000

Estimated Number of Grants Approximately10 -15 grants; average grant size $25,000 - $50,000; grants above $50,000 will be considered only with full justification and depending on number of faculty involved and the nature of the project. The budget should be appropriate to the scope of the project.

Eligibility Full-time faculty Adjunct faculty may participate in cooperation with full-time faculty Single-investigator or collaborative proposal Faculty who have had a PSC grant in the past may apply again if new

application will result in new funding proposals

Grant Period January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2011

Allowable Expenses Up to 6 credits total released time (3 per semester) not to exceed

2

mailto:[email protected]



University policy on released time; no overload in grant semesters. Summer II salary – up to 3 credits Project related travel expenses Supplies and equipment required by research

Topics for 2011 Competition Education research in all areas including instructional approaches and technologies, special education, improving teacher quality, improving math & science proficiency, improving methods of achieving competency in critical need foreign languages, education policy, and increasing student access, retention and achievement in postsecondary education.

Global Business research in all areas including technological innovations, globalization, improving international business curriculum and teaching including partnerships with trade associations and businesses.

Health Sciences and Health Education research in all areas including improving nursing education, practice and retention, improving care for underserved populations, and increasing the nursing workforce and diversity.

Humanities & Social Sciences research in all areas including human behavior, social and economic systems, law and legal processes

Science & Technology research in all areas including academic liaisons with industry.

Sustainability research in all areas including interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches.

Visual and Performing Arts including interdisciplinary and collaborative projects with education and health.

Competitive Preference Priority Additional competitive preference may be given to proposals that include: Human Rights Institute Liberty Hall collections Interdisciplinary and collaborative projects Direct student involvement in research

Due Date

Timeline for 2011 Competition

Proposal Deadline 5 p.m. Monday, November 1, 2011

Applications accepted September 2, 2010 – November 1, 2010Dean’s recommendations due November 8, 2010Grants announced December 1, 2010

Review Procedure Faculty submit applications to their respective Deans Deans review and forward recommended applications ORSP conducts technical review; forwards conforming applications to

Review Panel.

Review Criteria Proposals will be evaluated for intellectual merit and broader impacts and assessed for their potential to secure external funding. The most

3



important review criterion is external funding potential. Note that resubmissions of proposals previously submitted do not count toward fulfilling the requirement to seek external funding.

A combination of the National Science Board-approved merit review criteria and the Institute of Educational Research review criteria for scientific merit will be used to evaluate intellectual merit. Intellectual Merit: How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and

understanding within its own field or across different fields? Does the applicant provide a compelling rationale?

How well-qualified is the proposer (individual or team) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore

creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? How well-conceived and organized is the proposed activity? How well does the proposed activity integrate research and education?

The congruence and potential impact on the strategic plan and core initiatives of the University will be used to evaluate broader impacts.

Criteria Possible PointsExternal Funding Potential 40Intellectual Merit 20Broader Impacts 20Plan of Work 10Budget 10

Grant Mechanism Presidential Scholars Challenge grants consist of an Initial Grant and a Continuation Grant. The continuation grant is contingent on adequate progress against the plan of work outlined in the proposal; adequate progress on external funding activities; and, timely submission of all reports. Grants which become noncompliant at any time during the grant period may be withdrawn. (See reasons for noncompliance below)

Initial Grant Period: January 1, 2011 - June 30, 2011Continuation Grant Period: July 1, 2011 – December 31, 2011

Initial Grant Review Period: June 1, 2011 – June 14, 2011Continuation Grants announced June 15, 2011

Reporting Requirements Required external funding planning meeting with ORSP within 30 days of receiving grant.

Monthly progress reports Quarterly reports Final report

Reasons for Noncompliance Failure to comply with all reporting requirements on a timely basis. Failure to submit significant proposals for external funding within the

4



grant period. Use of grant funds for any expenditure not included in final, approved

budget

Note that grants which become noncompliant at any time during the grant period may be withdrawn.

PROPOSAL CONTENTS

I. PROPOSAL TITLE

II. PROJECT SUMMARY The project summary (Section II) is limited to one page.

This is a succinct but complete description of objectives, methods and significance. It must include a concise statement of your research program goal (what you intend to find out); the specific objectives for the period of the proposed project; and, a summary of the activity that would result if your project is funded. It must include a description of how this activity will better position the PI to apply for external funding to continue the research program. It must then clearly address “Intellectual Merit” and “Broader Impacts/Benefits to Kean University” in separate sections.

A. Intellectual MeritExplain the importance of the proposed activity to advancing knowledge or understanding within the field or across different fields; if applicable, highlight the creative, original or potentially transformative concepts involved.

B. Broader Impacts/Benefits to Kean UniversityExamples here include (but are not limited to) how this activity will support and enhance the infrastructure for research and/or education at Kean University and/or establish productive collaborations for the future; how the activity advances discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training and learning; how the participation of underrepresented groups will be expanded; how the activity benefits to society as a whole.

III. PROJECT NARRATIVE The project narrative (Section III) is limited to 10 pages including charts, maps, graphs, etc.

A. Objectives and Expected SignificanceThis section should start with a restatement of the research objective, a description of the specific objectives for the period of the proposed project, and the relation to the longer-term goals of the PI’s research program. (Remember, this funding is intended to support faculty who then pursue external funding to continue their research program.) Make a compelling case for the potential contribution of this project to the solution of a problem. Include why this objective is important and why it is interesting or difficult or challenging. Provide detail on the intellectual merit of your research objective. Your proposal should describe the contribution that your research is making to the knowledge base and how that impacts the field.

5



B. Background and NeedIn this section you will address what has been done so far and what is the missing knowledge. You might describe the value your research will provide and why these are important issues to be addressing now. You will put your work in context, citing the relevant literature and the work you are building on.

C. General Plan of Work

i. Activities, Methods, Procedures and AnalysisThis is where you provide the broad, technical description of your research plan: the specific activities, methods and data. Present a feasible plan and include a discussion of milestones and expected dates of completion. (Remember the PSC grant mechanism breaks the grant into an initial grant and a continuation grant so be sure you have sufficient, measureable activity planned early enough to show progress and justify continuation.) This is not a plan that you will follow no matter what – it is a path that you believe will get you from where you are now to where you want to be at the end of your research.

ii. PersonnelThe description of personnel on the project should make it apparent that the principal investigator and any key personnel possess the training and experience and will commit sufficient time to competently implement the proposed research. If this is a collaborative project with co-PIs, this is the section in which to describe the major activities, responsibilities and expected contributions of each member.

iii. ResourcesThis section is a brief description of the existing facilities, equipment, supplies and other resources available to the applicant that are required to support the proposed activities.

D. Future FundingIn this section you will describe your plan for seeking external funding. It is important to identify both specific funders and specific funding opportunities offered by these funders. Remember, a condition of this grant is to write and submit a significant new proposal for external funding during the grant period. A significant proposal would, at a minimum match the PSC grant at 2 to 1. So, if you are requesting a PSC grant with a benchmark budget of $40,000 you will need to identify funding opportunities that would provide the potential for a minimum of $80,000 in external funds. Note that resubmissions of proposals previously submitted do not count toward fulfilling the requirement to seek external funding.

The ORSP website http://orsp.kean.edu includes many resources for finding funding opportunities. Look under the “External Funding Opportunities” and “Resources and Training/KU Library Resources” links.

IV. REFERENCES CITEDCite the pertinent literature referenced within the project description. The references do not count in the proposal page limit.

6

http://orsp.kean.edu/



V. CURRICULA VITAEEach CV is limited to two pages, following NSF format. Includes up to five publications “most closely related to this proposal” and up to five “other significant” publications; include up to five synergistic activities.

VI. CURRENT & PENDING SUPPORTInclude both internal and external support and list only the following information:

Indication of whether support is Current or Pending Project Title Funding source Amount funded for current support (or) amount requested for pending support Project start and completion dates

VII. BUDGETAll applications must use the budget form for the PSC program, available on the ORSP website.

Note: SHADED AREAS CONTAIN FORMULAS. PLEASE DO NOT FILL.

1. Salaries and Fringe BenefitsList all personnel who will be involved in the project and complete all unshaded areas in

the budget sheet. Summer II salary should be calculated at the current overload rate. Include the roles and responsibilities of all project personnel in the budget justification.

The PI is eligible for 6 credits released time (3 spring, 3 fall) and three credits summer II salary. Released time cannot exceed University policy on total released time; no overload in grant semesters.

In the case of co-PIs, the six credits released time will be shared. Faculty are eligible for three credits summer salary. Graduate Assistants should be budgeted at $19,000 or indicated stipend amount. Undergraduate student assistants should be paid at the rate of $7.25/hour for up to 20

hours/week for the amount of weeks needed for the project or indicate stipend amounts. Academic Specialists are paid $12-$16/hour for 15 hours/week for the amount of weeks

needed for the project.

Amounts for non-faculty personnel should be entered in the academic base salary column.

2. Consultant CostsList all consultants to be used on the project in the budget sheet. Include the hourly rates

for each consultant and the responsibilities the consultant will have on the project in the budget justification.

3. EquipmentList all major items costing in excess of $500 on the budget sheet. Explain in detail why

the equipment is needed for the project and include quotations in budget justification. Do not include research supplies including kits, reagents, cells, serum, etc. with a cost over $500 in this section, these costs should be listed under supplies.

4. Supplies

7



List all supplies needed and the estimated cost of each item to complete the project in the budget sheet. Explain why each supply item is needed and how it is related to the project in the budget justification.

5. TravelItemize each destination and the estimated cost of the trip in the budget sheet. Explain

the need for the travel and how it is related to the project in the budget justification.

6. Other ExpensesItemize any other expenses that are related to the project and estimate their costs in the

budget sheet. These expenses may include: publication costs, equipment maintenance, software, etc. Explain the need for these expenses and how they are related to the project in the budget justification.

VIII. BUDGET NARRATIVEIn this section you are justifying your budget request. Include the roles and

responsibilities of all project personnel. If applicable, include the hourly rates for each consultant and the responsibilities the consultant will have on the project. If you are requesting equipment, explain in detail why the equipment is needed for the project and include quotations. Explain why each supply item is needed and how it is related to the project. Explain the need for the travel and how it is related to the project. Explain the need for any other expenses you included in your budget request and how they are related to the project.

IX. ATTACHMENTSA. Human Subjects / Vertebrate AnimalsComplete the “Other Project Information” form available for download on the ORSP website at: http://orsp.kean.edu

1. Human Subjects: If activities involving human subjects are planned at any time during the proposed project, check “yes” and complete the remaining sections under question 1. See the Institutional Review Board (IRB) section of the ORSP website for an explanation of the review categories. If no activities involving human subjects are planned, select “no” and skip the remaining sections under question 1.Note: An IRB Approval Date is not required at the time of submission but is a requirement of the grant.

2. Vertebrate Animals: If activities involving vertebrate animals are planned at any time during the proposed project, check “yes” and complete the remaining sections under question 2. See Institutional Care and Use Committee (IACUC) section of the ORSP website for an explanation of the IACUC review process. If no activities involving vertebrate animals are planned, select “no” and skip the remaining sections under question 2.Note: an IACUC Approval Date is not required at the time of submission but is a requirement of the grant.

B. Collaborative Arrangements (if applicable)If your proposal includes a collaborative arrangement with an outside organization, you must include a letter of support specifically outlining the activities that will be performed at that site. Do not include letters of support from consultants.

8

http://orsp.kean.edu/

presidential scholars challengeorsp.kean.edu/internal/docs/presidential scholars... · web...

Documents