president obama orders hit on ambassador stevens on 11th sept 2012

7/28/2019 President Obama Orders Hit on Ambassador Stevens on 11th Sept 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/president-obama-orders-hit-on-ambassador-stevens-on-11th-sept-2012 1/22

1

President Obama orders Hit On Ambassador

Stevens on 11th Sept 2012

From The Desk

Lloyd T Vance &

Timothy Bottom

News Today 4 U

Darwin NT

Australia



2

Greetings Fellow Australians

You know what I like about my job

as an Investigator – Researcher, Writer is playing the waiting

game for the truth to come out.

Not only waiting for the truth to come out, but for all the liarsto get egg on their faces, it would seems US President Barrack

Obama & Secretary Of State Hilary Clinton (Sheer Evil She Is)

It would seem, they better have their Life Insurance Policies

paid up, because the stunt they just tried to pull off with the

planned Assassination of Libya US Ambassador Stevens has just

blown up in their faces.

REMEMBER!

The truth never lies!

Its only when something is NOT The Truth, that people carry

out “False Flag Terrorist Attacks” – Assassinations and so

forth to try and make all those lies being told by Politicians,

Mainstream Media, Police, Military and Intelligence Agencies

look like the truth.

It would seem, thanks to US President Barrack Obama & Hilary

Clinton they just proved once and for all 11th Sept 2001 Was A

False Flag Terrorist Attack carried out by the Bush / Cheney

Cabal with outside help upon the shores of the USA.

I Can Hear You Saying How So?Please read the next 18 Pages, and a few points to

remember.

1) If the 11th Sept 2001 Fairy Tale Story is true “Al Qa`eda”

and 19 Muslims attacked America.

Well the following blows that story out the door.



3

2) The Al Qa`eda Terrorist blamed by the White House and

Barrack Obama for carrying out the attack and

assassination of Ambassador Stevens are the same lot of

people on the USA – CIA pay books.

3) Now if these people are on American – CIA pay books,

there was no flash mob, no protest etc, then the

targeted Assassination of Ambassador Stevens goes right

to the top and stops at Barrack Obama’s door.

4) If there was no flash mob, no protesters and security

detail called off prior to these paid Assassins & Terroriston American – CIA books attack, then the rest of the

properganda put out by the US Pentagon & CIA to

support the Official White House story is crap. The videos

of Al Qaeda ordering attacks in Benghazi and Cairo prior

to the attacks then taking credit for the attacks

afterwards and the fact that Al Qaeda was involved in the

attack which took place on the 11th anniversary of 9/11

completely blows the government’s narrative apart.

This stunt was ordered by Barrack Obama, Hilary

Clinton, US Pentagon Military Chiefs, CIA, NSA and FBI

all having their two bobs worth in how the stunt

should be carried out, and Remember it was all

planned to happen on 11th Sept 2012, to remind you of

the big bad Boogieman America is fighting.

Its all blown up in the faces

If 11th Sept 2001 really happened the way the American

Bush / Cheney Cabal say it happens, then there is NO

REASON to pull this below stunt.



4

Its only if the narrative and story about 11th Sept 2001

is NOT TRUE, then you pull stunts like this, which ever

way you look at it from here Barrack Obama & Hilary

Clinton have “Cold Blooded Murder” on their hands

now for setting one of their own US Ambassadors up

for a planned Assassination, all the wiggling, twisting

turning, ordering US Military Drones to Bomb OzBoy or

anybody else will not cover up what your about to

read.

As for CIA – Israeli Mossad Australian Prime Minister

Julia Gillard (That’s Nonsense, That’s Rubbish) I

would be looking for another job honey babe, you’rethe Kook, Nutjob, Liar that supported the Official story

all these years.

I hate to break the bad news to the “Red Headed

Bombshell” but looks like you been proven a

deliberate and utter compulsive liar once and for all

too.

Enjoy your reading people.



5

White House Lied No Protest Prior To

Benghazi Libya Attack

ABC reports The White House is admitting there

was no protest at all prior to the attack on the

Benghazi Libya consulate that killed the US

Ambassador.

As Congress prepares to hold hearings on the securityfailure at the US consulate in Benghazi, which was

attacked by Salafi Jihadists who killed four Americans

including Ambassador Chris Stevens, the White House

is apparently finally coming clean about the events

leading up to the attacks.

As ABC News reported last night my reports that the

corporate media was pushing a false narrative on the

Libya attacks is now confirmed through an admission

directly from the White House which now admits that

not only did they lie about the attack being an

escalation of a spontaneous protest over an anti-

Muslim film but that there was in fact no protest at

all prior to the attack.



6

The White house is coming clean because a major

congressional hearing on the security failure is set to

be held today and all of the “anonymous” intelligence

will be discussed.

The parroting corporate media could have easilyfollowed common sense and logic to break this story

much earlier instead of simply acting as a

stenographer for the government.

Given that there were nearly monthly attacks on

diplomatic targets in Libya leading up to the 9/11

Benghazi attack it was clear that the government’s

statement that were no prior indications of an attack

was an outright lie.

That taken in context with numerous intelligence

sources stating that the United States was warned in

the 72 to 24 hours prior to the attack, the videos of Al

Qaeda ordering attacks in Benghazi and Cairo prior to

the attacks then taking credit for the attacksafterwards and the fact that Al Qaeda was involved in

the attack which took place on the 11th anniversary of

9/11 completely blows the government’s narrative

apart.

Today’s congressional hearing is likely to reveal a lot

more on the attacks and only reinforce the fact that

the same Al Qaeda associated Salafi Jihadists we armedto overthrow Gaddafi’s government in Libya turned

around and attacked us less than a year later. And see

this and this.

Yet despite this horrible embarrassment for the

Obama administration we providing the same Salafi

Jihadists support right now in Syria to overthrow

Assad.



7

Just as in the campaign to topple Libya the corporate

media continues parroting government propaganda

to the public claiming the terrorist rebels are freedom

fighters rebelling to gain basic human rights when the

truth is NATO is exploiting Saudi Arabia indoctrinated

Islamic fundamentals who aren’t fighting for freedom.

Instead the truth is they are fighting a Holy War to

install Saudi Arabia’s version of Sharia law and put Syria

on the list of nation’s that have become Saudi satellite

states as a part of the so-called “Arab Spring”.

ABC - No Protest Outside Libya ConsulateBefore Attack

Transcripts From The ABC Report:

Diane: And now we have some breaking news to tell

you about tonight.

Just as we came on the air new details from the StateDepartment about what happened in Libya.

The violence that cost 4 Americans their lives including

US Ambassador Chris Stevens.

ABC’s John Karl is standing by with this late news.

John.

Jonathan Karl: Dianne, this is ahead of a major

congressional hearing tomorrow into what happened

in that attack on our consulate in Libya.

And we are hearing new details, details that we have

never heard before about what went down and this is

significantly different than what we were told at the

time.



8

At the time as you recall we were told it was a protest

[in response to an anti-Muslim film] that went bad and

became an attack.

Now we are told there was no protest going outside of

that embassy.

The first indication that they heard anything outside of

the embassy consulate compound was an explosion and

gunfire.

They looked through a camera to see what was going

on and we are told they saw a large number of armed

men coming in and approaching that compound.

We are told it was a very complex attack without

precedent in US diplomatic history and we have never

seen an attack like this in Libya or anywhere else, we

were told by a senior state department official.

Diane, one other fascinating details is that they still

don’t know how Ambassador Stevens got to thehospital.

Doctors at the hospital took is cell phone out of his

pants, out if his pocket, and started calling it and that

is how they found out he was there.

Diane: John, this is incredible breaking news tonight.

Any explanation for the change in the story.

John: Well this is part of their investigation they say

that they continue to investigate but they have never

given us anywhere near a detailed timeline like this.

And believe me Diane, a big part of this is because

they have a major congressional hearing tomorrow

and they wanted to get this out now.



9

Dianne: Alright, these new developments just in. Thank

you John Karl.

Note that there still two lies being told by the

government.

The first lie the government is stilling telling, that the

ABC report echoes , is that this was a complex attack

the likes of which has never been seen before in Libya

or elsewhere.

As I have previously documented attacks on

diplomatic targets were occurring in Libya on analmost monthly basis including attacks very similar to

this one.

The other is in regard to this information being the

result of the investigation when the truth is US assets

are still not on the ground in Libya to start their

investigation claiming they cant get “safe access” to

the compound.

The United States has had this information probably

since day one.

The truth is this information is simply being revealed

now because it will come out in today’s congressional

hearing.

The House Committee On Oversight and Government

Reform will have a hearing on the Benghazi attack and

possible cover-up tomorrow.

The hearing will focus on “The Security Failures of

Benghazi.”



10

It will include a review of attacks that took place

before September 11, 2012 — attacks which should

have provided the Obama administration with

credible reasons for increasing security in Benghazi

rather than cutting it.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, whose 16-man security detail was

pulled from Benghazi in August, will be a witness at

the hearing.

Wood arrived in Libya in February 2012, and he will tell

the Oversight Committee there were 13 “attacks or

threats” against U.S. officials between that time and

his departure in August……

House Oversight Committee Opens Hearing

On Benghazi-Gate Tomorrow

And See this:

The State Department said Tuesday it never concludedthat the consulate attack in Libya stemmed from

protests over an American-made video ridiculing Islam,

raising further questions about why the Obama

administration used that explanation for more than a

week after assailants killed the U.S. ambassador and

three other Americans.

The revelation came as new documents suggested

internal disagreement over appropriate levels of

security before the attack, which occurred on the 11th

anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the U.S.



11

Briefing reporters ahead of a hotly anticipated

congressional hearing Wednesday, State Department

officials provided their most detailed rundown of how

a peaceful day in Benghazi devolved into a sustained

attack that involved multiple groups of men armed

with weapons such as machine guns, rocket-propelled

grenades and mortars over an expanse of more than a

mile…..

State Dept We Didn’t Link Libya Attack to

Video

And this

Some U.S. intelligence personnel claim the Obama

administration tried to cover up details of the

Benghazi attack as part of a broader attempt to cover

up Egyptian and Iranian support for jihadists

throughout North Africa and the Middle East.

To this end, these intelligence community members

claim the Obama admin is withholding critical

information from senior officials and the public.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, one intelligence

official pointed out that Iran has been promising to hit

soft U.S. targets for some time, and a number of such

targets were hit at varying degrees on Sept. 11, 2012.

This intelligence official also points out that none of

the Obama administration’s explanations for what

happened have contained pertinent information

about “the cooperation of Iran and Egypt in

supporting jihadists in Libya.”………..



12

Obama Admin Invented the Entire Libya

Consulate Attack Narrative. There was NO

Protest!

http://xrepublic.net/node/569

Obama Pulls Security Team for Libyan

Ambassador, Before He was Killed.

Vatic Note: Just so you know, the Title goes with the

article below, however, if I had written it I would

change the title from "Obama .... pulls ..... " to read

"Hillary at the orders of the Israeli's pulls .... "

The first thing we have to remember, is the anomolies

that tell us the truth is buried deep and the official

story, just like 9-11, smells like rotted carcases in the

afternoon desert sun.

There is a list of these anomolies and this below is the

coup de grace to the official story.

The incompetence in pulling this off, speaks volumes

about the cackling witch of Sodom and Gomorrah. She

is way over her head in all of this assassination

business and cover up.

Here are the anomolies....

1. The town this was suppose to occur in did not

have any US offices there, no consulate, no

embassy, no protectorate, at least none officially

listed in government records.



13

2.The news story said those remaining security had no

ammo supplies.

Yet an article just before the killing of the ambassador

showed McCain showed up to deliver ammo, and

money to the rebels.

Yet they pulled security for the ambassador?

How come?

3. He was resisting the plan to create choas and

violence so that war could break out.

He was unhappy that McCain came to do what he did.

4. The powers that be said this was done by Al Qaeda.

Gee, a recent headlines said that Hitlary was sending

$45 billion of our tax dollars to "Al Qaeda".... excuseme, didn't they just supposedly kill our ambassador?

And she is sending them millions???

5. The ambassador had been begging for increased

security and instead had most of his security pulled.

6. He was sodomized by the rebels, well, the khazars

are pagans and are only 1 of 7 cultures that worships

the phallic symbol.

That is evident by their control of the porno industry,

penis enhancement businesses, and why pedophiling

and other sodomizing acts have been well know to

have been done by them.



14

Remember, they also sodomized Ghadaffi.

That is not an ARAB act, that is a khazar act.

Read their Babylonian Talmud and see for yourselves.

Now this below seals it.

This was a false flag using our own seasoned and well

respected Ambassador as a sacrificial lamb for their

perverted insane agenda.

The Latest Shoe to Drop Obama RegimeWithdrew 16 Member Special Forces Team

From Libya One Month Before Attack

October, 7, 2012

Gateway Pundit reports on the latest shoe to drop in

the egregious intelligence breakdown that led to the

death of the four Americans at our Consulate in Libya.

Not only did the Obama administration deny the

Ambassador the additional security he

requested, they withdrew a 16 member special forces

team from Benghazi one month before the

deadly attacks on 9-11.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood was the leader of the 16 member

special forces team whose job it was to protect US

personnel in Libya.

His team’s mission ended in August a month before

the deadly Al-Qaeda attack on 9-11.



15

A six member mobile security team was also

withdrawn around the same time.

This was despite the fact that there were over a dozen

attacks in the country this year.

Lt. Col. Wood was subpoenaed to appear at a House

committee hearing this coming week.

Wood told CBS News it was unbelievable to him that

the State Department withdrew security when they

did because of the 13 security incidents before 9-11.

Watch video of the Fox News report at GatewayPundit.

Nothing about this Benghazi story adds up.

Nothing.

Why did the State Dept insist Ambassador Stevens be

in the most dangerous part of Benghazi withoutprotection?

Why did the Obama administration peddle the bogus

story about a “spontaneous uprising” inspired by a

YouTube video?

That wasn’t “the best” intelligence they had at the

time.

There was never ANY intelligence that suggested that.

That was always SPIN coming from the Obama White

House.



16

We now know that members of the intelligence

community had briefed officials in the Obama

administration about what really had been going on…

“Elements of the intelligence community apparently

told the administration within hours of the attack thatmilitants connected with al Qaeda were involved, yet

Ambassador Rice claims her comments five days later

reflected the ‘best’ and ‘current’ assessment of the

intelligence community.

Either the Obama administration is misleading

Congress and the American people, or it is blaming the

entire failure on the intelligence community,” the

senators said in a joint response to Rice’s letter today.

Judge Jeanine Pirro opened her show this weekend by

methodically exposing the lies of the Obama

administration and questioning the inexcusably lax

security in Bengahzi despite the Ambassador’s

requests for more.

She also noted that the British left a week earlier

because they could see the handwriting on the wall,

yet the Americans stayed in place like sitting ducks.

Via The Right Scoop, the most potent part of her

monologue:

We know that Ambassador Christopher Stevens was in

fear.

We know that he wrote that he was on an Al-Qaeda hit

list.

But Christopher Stevens believed in America.



17

Christopher Stevens believed he could make a

difference.

He upheld his part of the bargain.

The Obama administration, Hillary Clinton in particular,did not.

Via New Zeal, here are a few more questions that

need answers

Why was Ambassador Stevens in the most dangerous

part of Benghazi with no protection?

Was he brokering arms deals with the rebels /

terrorists?

Was he working for the CIA?

There was an alarming rise in al Qaeda activity before

the murders and no one said a word.

• Why were ex-Navy SEALs killed trying to protect

Stevens?

(Those SEALs were there trying to recover weapons

from al Qaeda.)

I know they died bravely in the line of duty, running

to the aid of Stevens – but where were those that

should have protected Stevens?

From what I understand, a private security detail was

ordered – where was the military?



18

• Why did Obama claim that it was being

investigated when it wasn’t?

Over three weeks later, investigators are on their way.

The entire scene is now compromised and they knowit.

Telling signs of violent assault and torture were in that

compound – bloody hand prints on the walls, a toilet

covered in blood.

Did you know that CNN found Stevens’ journal on the

ground in the compound days after the event?

• Why are important facts not being disseminated?

For instance, did you know that our consulate there

was bombed twice before Stevens was killed?

Did you know that there had been 13 violent

incidents, 5 serious, before the murders?

Did you know that the British Red Cross pulled out

because of the violence?

Did you know that radicals had posted Stevens’

jogging route on Facebook before he was murdered?

And why didn’t our government know?

Why?



19

• Is this whole thing part of the Muslim

Brotherhood agenda aided by Barack Obama and

his administration?

Did you know that the terrorists were upset beforeJuly when the YouTube clip originally aired and that is

one of the reasons Obama was meeting with the

Muslim Brotherhood and Morsi?

Did you know they discussed releasing the Blind

Sheikh?

• Why were repeated requests for security in

Benghazi denied by the State department ?

• Did you know a prime suspect in the murder of

Ambassador Stevens and the others was a terrorist

released from an Egyptian prison during the ArabSpring?

• Did you know that over 20 American embassies

have been attacked since the incident?

SEE ALSO

Doug Ross: MELTDOWN: Intel Community

Blasts Obama for Removing Amb. Stevens’

Security, Lying About Al Qaeda and

Covering Up Its Epic Failures: -



20

Revolt of the Spooks

Intelligence officials angered by Obama administration

cover up of intelligence on Iranian, al Qaeda surge in

Egypt and Libya

Weeks before the presidential election, President

Barack Obama’s administration faces mounting

opposition from within the ranks of U.S. intelligence

agencies over what career officers say is a “cover up”

of intelligence information about terrorism in North

Africa.

Intelligence held back from senior officials and the

public includes numerous classified reports revealing

clear Iranian support for jihadists throughout the

tumultuous North Africa and Middle East region, as

well as notably widespread al Qaeda penetration into

Egypt and Libya in the months before the deadly Sept.

11 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

…Intelligence officials pointed to the statement issued

Sept. 28 by the Office of the Director of National

Intelligence (ODNI) that raised additional concern

about the administration’s apparent mishandling of

intelligence…

Officials say the ODNI’s false information was either

knowingly disseminated or was directed to be put outby senior policy officials for political reasons, since the

statement was contradicted by numerous intelligence

reports at the time of the attack indicating it was al

Qaeda-related terrorism…



21

Cover Up Obama Administration Yanked a

16-Member Special Forces Team From

Benghazi, A Month Before Attack

(And A Month Before The Calender-Predictable Arrivalof September 11th)

Hit the link for two brutal videos with highlights from

the past few weeks of the regime’s cover up.

Below, a pair of brutal videos about the cover up.

The first, from ObamaIsn’tWorking, is a very cinematiceffort, with quick cuts and grating, ominous music.

Ben Howe’s video is a corker, too — less music, less

dramatic cuts, but a fuller account of the Benghazi

Cover-Up.

It lets the facts speak for themselves more.

Reality Check - U.S. Is Supporting Al Qaeda in

Syria

http://xrepublic.net/node/566

US Trains Terrorists In Kuwait Camps

&

Al-Qaeda-Trained Terrorists Sent to Syria

from Waziristan

&



U.S. Trained Terror Group

Al Qaeda and NATO's Pan-Arab Terrorist

Blitzkrieg

Al-Qaeda Leader Strikes Deal With U.S.,

Saudis To Send 5,000 Fighters to Syria

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=55723

president obama orders hit on ambassador stevens on 11th sept 2012

Documents