presenter: sirisha kothuri skothuri@pdx authors: sirisha kothuri titus reynolds
DESCRIPTION
Automated Bicycle Data Collection. Automated Bicycle Data Collection: A Case Study from Portland, OR Western District Annual ITE Meeting June 26th, 2012. Presenter: Sirisha Kothuri [email protected] Authors: Sirisha Kothuri Titus Reynolds Christopher Monsere Peter Koonce. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Automated Bicycle Data Collection: A Case Study from
Portland, ORWestern District Annual ITE Meeting
June 26th, 2012
Presenter:Sirisha Kothuri
Authors:
Sirisha Kothuri
Titus Reynolds
Christopher Monsere
Peter Koonce
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
1
Outline
Introduction Study Area Bicycle Counts Bicycle Delay Summary Next Steps
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
2
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
3Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Our intentions are to be assustainable a city as possible.That means socially, that means environmentally and that means economically. The bike is great on all three of those factors. You just can’t get a better transportation return on your investment than you get with promoting bicycling.
– Mayor Sam Adams
Source: P Koonce
Portland’s Bicycle NetworkAutomated Bicycle Data Collection
4Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
2010 Bicycle Network Bicycle boulevards Bicycle lanes Off street paths Total system (314 mi)
Source: R Geller
Portland’s Bicycle NetworkAutomated Bicycle Data Collection
5Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Source: R Geller
Bridge Bicycle Traffic
Bikeway Miles
Increasing Bicycle UseCyclistsPer Day
BikewayMiles
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
12,500
15,000
17,500
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Bridge Bicycle Traffi c2,850 3,555 3,885 3,830 3,207 4,520 5,225 5,690 5,910 6,015 7,686 8,250 8,562 8,875 10,192 12,046 14,563 16,711
Bikeway Miles 79 84.5 87 104 114 144 167 183 214 222.5 236 253 256 262 265.5 269 272 274
2008:~300 miles of bikeways
16,711 daily trips
1996:~150 miles of bikeways
4,520 daily trips
2004:SmartTrips Program expands
Where are we going?Automated Bicycle Data Collection
6Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Data | Pedestrian Data | Summary | Next Steps
Why is this important?
Bicycle Data Gaps/Deficiencies in data Evaluation of system performance Current demand estimation Future infrastructure and operational needs Prioritize investments Improve safety
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
7Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Objective
Utilize existing infrastructure to develop a long term monitoring and collection system to monitor bicycle activity.
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
8Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Study AreaAutomated Bicycle Data Collection
9Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
I-205
I-5
I-84US-26
DowntownOR -217
Bicycle Data Bicycle Counts Bicycle Delay
Pedestrian Data Push button actuations Pedestrian Delay
Bicycle DataAutomated Bicycle Data Collection
10Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Single inductive loops Advance loop counts Criteria for counts
Bicycle lane Advance loop in bike
lane Individual loop wire Communication
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
11Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Count Verification
Outbound Loop
Inbound Loop
Video and loop counts Underestimation of
loop counts
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
12Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Daily Trend
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
13Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Weekday Trends
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
14Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Bicycle Delay
Active at one intersection Internal logic commands Latch is set -
Bike is detected Light status ≠ green
Latch is released Light status = green
Delay = Duration of latch Maximum delay per cycle
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
15Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Bicycle Delay
0
5
10
15
20
1:00 4:00 7:00 10:00 13:00 16:00 19:00 22:00
Freq
uenc
y
Time
0-2021-40>40
Delay Reduction Strategies Coordinated Free Increase in permissive length
PORTAL
Regional data archive Data currently archived:
Freeway loop detector Weather Incidents Bluetooth Bike and Ped Arterial
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
16Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
http://portal.its.pdx.edu/
Conclusions
Growing need for bicycle data Operations Planning
Bicycle counts from inductive loops Cost effective Potential for undercounting Affected by placement, sensitivity and
calibration
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
17Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Next Steps
Expansion and verification of counts Expansion of bicycle delay to other
intersections Optimizing signal timing based on delay
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
18Introduction | Study Area | Bicycle Counts | Bicycle Delay | Summary | Next Steps
Thank you!
Sirisha Kothuri
Titus Reynolds
titus.reynolds@portland oregon.gov
Christopher Monsere
Peter Koonce
Automated Bicycle Data Collection
19
http://portal.its.pdx.edu/