presented to: by: date: federal aviation administration group manager program review management team

Presented to:

By:

Date:

Federal AviationAdministrationGroup Manager

Program Review

Management Team

2 2Federal AviationAdministration

<Presentation Title – Change on Master Slide><Date of Presentation – Change on Master Slide>

Group Mission

Mission Statement/Synopsis



Organization

Group Summary# FAA Employees

# Contractor EmployeesAvailable & Anticipated Contract $

Group Summary# FAA Employees

# Contractor EmployeesAvailable & Anticipated Contract $

GroupGroup Manager

# FAA Employees# Contractor Employees

TeamTeam Manager


TeamTeam Manager


Team

Team Manager# FAA Employees

# Contractor Employees

TeamTeam Manager


TeamTeam Manager


TeamTeam Manager


TeamTeam Manager


TeamTeam Manager


TeamTeam Manager




Goal Alignment & Status

FAA Goal* Milestone (date) Status

* Flight Plan Alignment

Business Plan/SPIRE

ATO/SMP Objective Alignment



Technical Stature • Measures:

– Patents (Patent disclosures, Copyrights)– Professional Societies (Memberships, Office holder, Speaker, Organizer) – Professional Licenses (including Airmen Certificates)– Publications

• Referred journals• Books• Chapters in a review (book)• Non-referred journals• Trade publications• Internal TC reports• Internal TC notes

– Conference presentations/papers– Academic Appointments (Faculty appointments, Advisory boards, Honorary degrees)– Degree(s) held (include discipline)*– Certifications/Training– Years of Professional Experience– Community Involvement– Military Status

*(Undergraduate: BA, BS, BSEE, etc. Graduate: ME, MA, MS, MBA, PhD, etc.)FYI only: for use after baseline is established



Courses

Total # of testers

requiring training*

Number to be trained in course in

FY08

Number of Classes

Relative Progress

toward 100% Goal

Number of testers trained

V&V Process Training

79 79 4 7.2

Fundamentals of T&E

76 76 3 6.9

AMS 76 76 3 6.9

Developing User Requirements: The Key to Project Success

73 60 3 5.4

Configuration

Management

53 53 2 4.8

Technical Writing 40 40 2 3.6

Total 34.9**

T&E Training Status (for T&E organization to report out status against goal)

*Total number of testers is 100

** Current baseline is 47.3%, FY08 goal is 65%, if FY08 numbers are achieved, we will score 82.2% towards goal



NextGen Support

Significant NextGen Support Activities*

1.

2.

3.

*Should only include direct NextGen support activities that the Group Manager deems significant because of: visibility, current or potential impact on TC resources or Group direction, and customer interest, etc. Routine NextGen support will be briefed at the Team level.



Group Manager Project Summary Project Name

Team• Purpose

Accomplishments• • •

Plans• • •

Issues• • •



Team Presentation Order

• Team 1• Team 2• etc

Presented to:

By:

Date:

Federal AviationAdministration

Team Manager

Program Review

Management Team



Team Overview

• Mission:

• Sponsors: (Office(s) funding project)

• Customers: (User/s of system products/services and/or T&E results)

• Stakeholders: (Those affected by or accountable for the project outcome – can include customers)

• Partnerships: (Organizations or parties collaborating on products/services; example NASA. Air Force, Universities, etc.)



Project

FY08

FED #

FTEs

FY08

Contr #

FTEs

FY09

FED #

FTEs

FY09

Contr #

FTEs

FY10

FED #

FTEs

FY10

Contr #

FTEs

# # # # # #

Resource Status



Resource Status (for Labs/Ops)

Project

FY08

FED #

FTEs

FY08

Contr #

FTEs

FY09

FED #

FTEs

FY09

Contr #

FTEs

FY10

FED #

FTEs

FY10

Contr #

FTEs

# # # # # # # # # # # #

Total # Total # Total # Total # Total # Total #

# # # # # # # # # # # #


# # # # # # # # # # # #




Budget/Funding Status

*Corporate Work Plan (replaces PD)

Project Contract $ Received (Previous

FY)

Carry-

over

Planned (Cur FY)

Received (Cur FY)

Oblig to Date

CWP* Status

(Signed, Awaiting Sig, N/A)

Planned $

FY08 FY09



(Project 1-n) Overview/Status/Risks

Overview– Purpose

– Description

– Sponsor/Stakeholders

– Alignment to Goals



Focus Areas (for Ops)QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4

SMP Objective Focus Areas/Initiatives Project/Project Lead What by when Target O N D J F M A M JP2.42 Increase the efficient use of resources Focus Area #1: Cost Reduction/Efficiency

G G G G G G G G GG G G G G G G G G

P4.7 Foster value-driven workplace Focus Area #2: Organizational Assessments

G G G G G G G G GG G G G G G G G GG G G G G G G G G

P2.5 Increase ATO productivity Focus Area #3: Improving Work Management Levels

G G G G G G G G GG G G G G G G G G

P1.7 Plan and execute well across organizational units Focus Area #4: Building relationships - employees, peer organizations, customers, etc.

G G G G G G G G GG G G G G G G G GG G G G G G G G G



Project Status

• Status 08/09 Dates

1. *Planned Critical Milestones (Level 1)– **Milestone Support Activities (Level 2)

– ***Tasks (Level 3)

2. Planned Critical Milestones– Milestone Support Activities

– Tasks*Customer milestones and commitments to JRC/EC in the program baseline; i.e., Contract Award, GA, IOC, ORD, ISD

**Commitments to the customer in a Corporate Work Plan or MOU and Standard T&E milestones in AMS; i.e., Start Test (system delivery to test), TRR, Completion of DT, Completion of OT,

***Milestones associated with tasks that support Level 2 milestones; i.e., Test Plan complete, Test procedure

development complete, dry runs complete, test conduct complete, quick-look report complete, test report complete,

Labs example: **Maintain ISO 9001:2000 Certification through certification audit, ***Complete internal audit



Status/Measures (Graphics to be provided by Ops)



Agreement Status (for Ops)

FAA Technical Center AgreementsFY07 Cost Estimate

BalanceQuality Review

Status (R,Y,G)

Notes

DHS CUSTOMER

FAA CUSTOMER

OTHER



Project Risks

Risk Analysis

• List Risk/s*

• Rating

• Mitigation Lik

elih

oo

d

Consequence1 2 3 4 5

E

D

C

B

A

Medium

Low

High

Lik

elih

oo

d**

*IF (describe the situation that may occur)

THEN (describe the negative impact if it does)

**Likelihood – reflects the probability that a program objective will not be obtained by following existing plans

Consequence – the program penalty or benefit loss incurred if the objective is not obtained



Summary of Actionable Items

Risk Level Definitions

“High” (red)Is likely (a high probability) to cause significant disruption of schedule, increase in cost, or degradation of performance. Concerted and continual emphasis and coordination may not be sufficient to overcome major difficulties.

“Medium” (yellow)

May cause some disruption of schedule, increase in cost, or degradation of performance. Special emphasis and close coordination is probably sufficient to overcome difficulties.

Program/Project Issues Description Suggested Solution

R/Y

R/Y

R/Y



Outstanding Issues or Concerns (for Ops)



Team Accomplishments

Accomplishments *

1.

2.

3.

*Accomplishments that the Team Manager believes are most significant and warrant highlighting



Group Manager Wrap-up

• Performance Risks • Issues • etc



Group Wrap-up

• Group Initiatives

presented to: by: date: federal aviation administration group manager program review management team

Documents