presented to: by: date: federal aviation administration federal grants and airport capital...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Presented to:
By:
Date:
Federal AviationAdministrationFederal Grants and
Airport Capital Improvement Programs
Western-Pacific Region
Association of California Airports
Brian Armstrong
September 15, 2010
![Page 2: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
CA Best Practices on ACIP
The proposed project(s) should: – Be prioritized and fully justified by the sponsor based on
needs.– Be consistent with the following documents:
• Airport Master Plan
• Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
• Airport’s Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program
• Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT) Report
• Airport’s FAA Pavement Maintenance Management Program (PMMP) and Caltrans Airport Pavement Management System (APMS)
• FAR Part 139 inspection report
• Caltrans 5010 inspection letters
![Page 3: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
CA Best Practices on ACIP (Cont)
The proposed project(s) should: – Meet eligibility requirements of FAA and Caltrans.– Be phased-in if the project is cost prohibitive based on
available State and Federal funding.– Be consistent with the national priority system found within
FAA Order 5100.39A “Airports Capital Improvement Plan”. A copy of FAA Order 5100.39A can be found in FAA website: www.faa.gov/airports under Airport Improvement Program (AIP).
– Be the subject of early communication with FAA and Caltrans to ensure proper analysis pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
![Page 4: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
2012 – 2015 ACIP Planning
• October 18, 2010 - Expect letters requesting sponsor’s ACIPs to come out from FAA and State simultaneously.
• January 18, 2011 - Due Date for sponsor submittals
![Page 5: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
2012 – 2015 ACIP Planning• Be prepared. Expect us to fully consider the following in
considering your projects:
– AIP 4-year and older grant status
– AIP inactive grant status
– Part 139 compliance and corrective actions
– Consistency with Master Plan
– Reasonableness of forecasts (consistency with TAF)
– Airport Layout Plan (up to date and project depicted)
– Current and Accurate Exhibit A Property Map
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
To be expended 18% 60% 81% 91% 96%
Maximum to remain 82% 40% 19% 9% 4%
Year of Appropriation
1st Year after Appropriation
2nd Year after Appropriation
3rd Year after Appropriation
4th Year after Appropriation
![Page 6: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
2012 – 2015 ACIP Planning– Project Need and timing
• Special considerations for runway extension, supplemental runway, and land acquisition projects
– Airspace Review
– Status of Environmental Analysis• Presume 6-months for FAA to make Cat Ex determination• Presume 18-months for EA
– Status and Plan for Engineering and Design (do not exceed 30% design before NEPA is done)
– Overall funding strategy:• Use of entitlement funds on high priority projects• Project phasing• LOI or virtual LOI• Multiyear (carryover and reimbursement)• Use of PFC• Local Funding (Matching and in lue of AIP)
![Page 7: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
Fiscal Year 2011 Program • Level of funding and program is unclear
until the AIP is reauthorized. Anticipate funding levels similar to recent years.
• We are focusing more on proper planning before project is included in FAA’s AIP program and/or AIP provided.
Project Timing and Justification Established. Environmental Complete. Airspace is filed/complete (7460 or 7480). Airport Layout Plan Current and Depicts Project. Design complete or nearly complete. The advertisement and bid opening date established.
• Expect strict adherence to the May 1 application and AIP carryover declaration deadline.
![Page 8: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
2011 ACIP Related NEPA Workload• To fully implement our 2011 Program as
planned, there are:– 82 projects that may be Categorically
Excluded (CatEx) and no further action is required other than to document the Cat Ex in the project folder.
• 8 in HNL, 38 in SFO, 36 in LAX
– 335 projects that are normally CatEx but willrequire a review to determine if any Extraordinary Circumstances exist.
• 29 in HNL, 193 in SFO, 113 in LAX
– 15 projects that require at least an Environmental Assessment (EA).
• 1 in HNL, 7 in SFO, 7 in LAX
• In addition, there are 18 projects in 2012 and 13 projects in 2013 that are likely to require an EAs or EISs.
![Page 9: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Grants and Airport Capital Improvement Programs Western-Pacific Region Association of California](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649cf65503460f949c5fd5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9Federal AviationAdministration
FAA Update
Questions?