presented by : vincent james nsp research group (british isles)

1

Presented by : Vincent JamesPresented by : Vincent JamesNSP Research Group (British Isles)NSP Research Group (British Isles)

04/22/23 No State Project UK - Vince James

04/22/23 2No State Project UK - Vince James

www.nostateproject.co.nr

MarcStevensAdventuresinLegalLandWikispaces.comWikispaces.com


http://marcstevensadventuresinlegalland.wikispaces.com/

Marc Stevens is the author of the now infamous, inter-continental cult classic “Adventures in Legal Land”, and is currently soon to release his second book “Government Indicted”.04/22/23 5No State Project UK - Vince James

The first question people ask about Marc’s Book & work is ?

“Does it apply in the UK, and under our Legal System”

Answer:YES, Absolutely, there may be subtle

differences in procedures, and/or word definitions etc., but basically it’s all the same in substance, meaning, and Legal Opinion.

The American Legal System was adopted from the English Common law, in and around 1776.


Marc is not a lawyer or Guru, but like almost all of us was at one time on the receiving end of Bureaucratic & judicial corruption, and was so disillusioned by the experience, he sought to find answers to what he personally had witnessed and observed, not just from his experiences in court but from doing his own investigation and research into the many claims being made by “patriot & freedom movement guru’s” in the early 90’s.

Marc best explains this part of his journey in the “must watch “ Video of his talk given at The Liberty Forum in 2009. titled “Delusions”


Those who attack the rationale of the game, & not the players, are its

most formidable adversaries.— James J. Martin, in the

introduction to Lysander Spooner's No Treason: The Constitution of No

Authority.


http://liberatetheobsessed.tripod.com/id49.htm

http://liberatetheobsessed.tripod.com/id49.htm

This Best Describes Marc’s approach to dealing with Bureaucrats

Marc endeavours to look at the facts, not at the words and fictions hidden behind them, to hide and get away from those facts. In doing so he has demonstrated that the “legal system” and “Government”, is nothing more than a” public relations scam”.

By looking at the actual facts using objective observation and logic it is very clear to see the fatal flaws in the system, reason being because of the nature on which is was built.

By going to the heart of the matter, using the legal reality "they" have created, you can get them to contradict themselves and prove their claims were never valid or based on facts to begin with.


This is not about winning your case, as Marc points out, “once you are in the clutches of a bureaucrat or the legal system, you have already lost (ultimately they have guns and are perfectly willing to use them) - now it is simply a matter of trying to prevent further damage. There is no "winning."

This talk will hopefully give you a brief insight into Marc’s way of reasoning and questioning, so you too can learn to use "their" system and flawed logic back against them.

By understanding the rules that they have placed upon themselves in an effort to appear fair and just, you can use this to your advantage to expose the contradictions within the system.

The result being you will embarrass them so badly that they will sooner drop any alleged claim against you in order to save face and not expose the true nature.


Quote: Rudyard Kipling

I keep six honest serving-men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who. I send them over land and sea, I send them east and west; But after they have worked for me I give them all a rest


PART. 1


How does the “Law” apply ?


A legal duty is an obligation imposed by the law. Failure to fulfil such a duty can result in criminal or civil sanctions. Legal duties are distinct from moral or ethical duties; while a duty may be both legal and ethical, only legal duties are enforced by the justice system.

Legal duties can be created in several ways and by several different types of law. Within countries called common law countries — such as the United Kingdom and the United States — previous cases brought before a judge can create a legal duty. Legislation written by the state, local or county government can also impose a legal duty on individuals within the borders that the law applies to.

There are also two general classifications of legal duties: those duties where a breach is criminal and subject to criminal sanctions and those duties where the breach is punishable under civil law. There may be some overlap and certain behaviours may be governed both by criminal and civil law. This means that certain actions may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties.


Causation is the "causal relationship between conduct and result". That is to say that causation provides a means of connecting conduct with a resulting effect, typically an injury. In criminal law, it is defined as the actus reus (an action) from which the specific injury or other effect arose and is combined with mens rea (a state of mind) to comprise the elements of guilt. Causation is only applicable where a result has been achieved and therefore is immaterial with regard to inchoate offenses. (An inchoate offense is one that is contemplated but not committed).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inchoate_offense

PART. 2


Civil & Criminal Law Explained


A “Civil Action”


Civil law (common law)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Civil law courts provide a forum for deciding disputes involving torts (such as accidents, negligence, and libel), contract disputes,

The objectives of civil law are different from other types of law. In civil law there is the attempt to right a wrong, honor an agreement, or settle a dispute. If there is a victim, they get compensation, and the person who is the cause of the wrong pays, this being a civilized form of, or legal alternative to, revenge.

An action in criminal law does not necessarily preclude an action in civil law in common law countries, and may provide a mechanism for compensation to the victims of crime.

Difference from criminal lawIn many countries such as the USA and UK, criminal law has to prove that a party is guilty

beyond a reasonable doubt when a case is sent to court. Civil law operates differently, as the UK standard is only to prove guilt on the basis of a balance of probability. In civil law cases, the "burden of proof" requires the plaintiff to convince the trier of fact (whether judge or jury) of the plaintiff's entitlement to the relief sought. This means that the plaintiff must prove each element of the claim, or cause of action, in order to recover.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_a_reasonable_doubt

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Balance_of_probability&action=edit&redlink=1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_burden_of_proof

SOURCE: www.otto-graph.com

Tort

A wrong involving a breach of duty, and resulting in an injury to the person or property of another. A tort is distinguished from a breach of a contract in that a tort is a violation of a duty established by law,

whereas a breach of contract results from a failure to meet an obligation created by the agreement of the parties


Source:http://www.investopedia.com

Definition of 'Tort Law'The area of law that covers the majority of all civil

lawsuits. Essentially, every claim that arises in civil court with the exception of contractual disputes falls under tort

law. The concept of tort law is to redress a wrong done to a person, usually by awarding them monetary damages as

compensation.


http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tort-law.asp

http://www.investopedia.com/

http://www.investopedia.com/

As Lord Goff observed recently:

The situation in common law countries, including of course England, is exceptional, in that the common law grew up within a procedural framework uninfluenced by Roman law. The law was categorised by reference to the forms of action, and it was not until the abolition of the forms of action by the Common Law Procedure Act 1852 (15 & 16 Vict c 76) that it became necessary to reclassify the law in substantive terms.

The result was that common lawyers did at last separate our law ofobligations into contract and tort, though in so doing they relegated quasi-contractual

claims to the status of an appendix to the law of contract, thereby postponing by a century or so the development of a law of restitution. Even then, there was no systematic reconsideration of the problem of concurrent claims in contract and tort. We can see the courts rather grappling with unpromising material drawn from the old cases in which liability in negligence derived largely from categories based upon the status of the defendant. In a sense, we must not be surprised; for no significant law faculties were established at our universities until the late 19th century, and so until then there was no academic opinion available to guide or stimulate the judges ...


Tort v Criminal

The distinction between the crime and tort is not in the conduct itself, but in the legal proceedings which follow and the purpose of those proceedings.

A person may be both prosecuted by the state and be sued by the victim (plaintiff). The fundamental aim of criminal Law is to reduce certain kinds of conduct by measures which include punishment, deterrence and rehabilitation, whereas the fundamental aim of tort is to compensate the victim.

The purpose of civil law is to deal with the private rights and duties of citizens as opposed to administrative law, criminal law, or military law.


“WHEN”

ESTABLISHING A TIMELINE ?

ASK HOW, WHY, WERE AND WHEN ANYALLEGED OBLIGATION OR “DUTY WAS” CREATED?


Magna Carta, Bill of Rights & ECHR ?


A Government is an organization within a specific geographic location which is dominant in physical force. Government is necessary to ensure the proper use of force. For this reason, it must specify objective laws to clarify the use of force, and it must have the ability to enforce these laws.

The purpose of government is to protect the individual rights of its citizens. Since rights can be assaulted both within a country or outside of it, the government must deal with either threat. This requires an army for defence of the country, and a police system to protect the individual citizens from other individuals within the country. To ensure that rights are upheld properly, the judgment of the use of force must be objective. Since individuals involved in an incident are not likely to be objective, it is the government's job to judge the individual use of force by its citizens. For this reason, the government must provide a court system. Laws are the tools by which the court decides if a use of force is valid or not.


http://www.importanceofphilosophy.com/Politics_InitiationOfForce.html

http://www.importanceofphilosophy.com/Politics_InitiationOfForce.html

http://www.importanceofphilosophy.com/Politics_Rights.html

Magna Carta, also called Magna Carta Libertatum, is an English charter, originally issued in the year 1215 and reissued later in the 13th century in modified versions.

The later versions excluded the most direct challenges to the monarch's authority that had been present in the 1215 charter.

The charter first passed into law in 1225; the 1297 version, with the long title (originally in Latin) The Great Charter of the Liberties of England, and of the Liberties of the Forest, still remains on the statute books of England and Wales.

Source: Wikpedia


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_England

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_and_Wales

The 1215 charter required King John of England to proclaim certain liberties, and accept that his will was not arbitrary, for example by explicitly accepting that no "freeman" (in the sense of non-serf) could be punished except through the law of the land, a right which is still in existence today.Magna Carta was the first document forced onto an English King by a group of his subjects, the feudal barons, in an attempt to limit his powers by law and protect their privileges. It was preceded and directly influenced by the Charter of Liberties in 1100, in which King Henry I had specified particular areas wherein his powers would be limited.

Source Wikipedia


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_England

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_land

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_King

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_feudal_barony

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_Liberties

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_I_of_England

Source: Wikipedia,Bill of Rights 1689 The Bill of Rights[1] or the Bill of Rights 1688[2] is an Act of the Parliament of England

.The Bill of Rights was passed by Parliament on 16 December 1689.[3] It was a

restatement in statutory form of the Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William and Mary in March 1689 (or 1688 by Old Style dating), inviting them to become joint sovereigns of England.

It lays down limits on the powers of sovereign and sets out the rights of Parliament and rules for freedom of speech in Parliament, the requirement to regular elections to Parliament and the right to petition the monarch without fear of retribution. It reestablished the liberty of Protestants to have arms for their defence within the rule of law, and condemned James II of England for "causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law".

These ideas about rights reflected those of the political thinker John Locke and they quickly became popular in England. It also sets out—or, in the view of its drafters, restates—certain constitutional requirements of the Crown to seek the consent of the people, as represented in Parliament.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights_1689


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Parliament

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_England


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_Parliament_(1689)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_and_Mary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Style_and_New_Style_dates

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_II

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papist

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crown

"Consent of the governed" is a phrase synonymous with a political theory wherein a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is only justified and legal when derived from the people or society over which that political power is exercised. This theory of "consent" is historically contrasted to the divine right of kings and has often been invoked against the legitimacy of colonialism. Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government."

Source: Wikipedia


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_philosophy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government

Does this claim to be

a Contract !

If yesBetween who !!!


Our constitutions purport to be established by 'the people,' and, in theory, 'all the people'

consent to such government as the constitutions authorize. But this consent of 'the people' exists

only in theory. It has no existence in fact. Government is in reality established by the few;

and these few assume the consent of all the rest, without any such consent being actually given.

....... Lysander Spooner


The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago. And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner.

......Lysander Spooner, No Treason…


PART. 4


The Myth of State & Citizens


cit·i·zen (s t -z n) n. 1. A person owing loyalty to and entitled by birth or

naturalization to the protection of a state or nation. 2. A resident of a city or town, especially one entitled to vote and

enjoy other privileges there. 3. A civilian. 4. A native, inhabitant, or denizen of a particular place: "We have

learned to be citizens of the world, members of the human community" (Franklin D. Roosevelt).

[Middle English citisein, from Anglo-Norman citesein, alteration (perhaps influenced by dainzain, denizen) of Old French citeain, from cite, city; see city.]

cit i·zen·ly adj. Synonyms: citizen, national, subject

These nouns denote a person owing allegiance to a nation or state and entitled to its protection: an American citizen; a British national; a French subject.



In performing the functions of investigating and preventing crime the police owe no duty do care to an individual member of the public. In such circumstances even were harm was reasonably foreseeable, there is insufficient proximity between the police and the victim. (Hill v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (HL, 1988).And Smith v. chief constable of Sussex (2008 ).

The Police are here to protect the public...are they?

....Some famous cases.

Chief Constable of Hertfordshire v Van Colle (Administrator of the Estate of GC, Deceased) and Another; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex

[2008] UKHL 50 HL (Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Hope of Craighead,

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Carswell, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood) July 30 2008

ABSTRACT Article 2 does not affect the principle established in Hill

v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1989) AC 53, namely that, in the absence of special circumstances, the police owed no common law duty of care to protect individuals against harm caused by criminals


B e f o r e :LORD JUSTICE PILLLORD JUSTICE SEDLEY and LORD JUSTICE RIMER Between: SMITH Appellant - and - CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SUSSEX POLICE RespondentThe commission of the peace creates public law duties which can be

enforced by mandatory orders[1], but not, by itself, private law duties. Correspondingly, no duty of care is owed by the police to the public at large so as to render them liable to an individual who suffers harm by their neglect. The bedrock of this doctrine is Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire[2], in which the House of Lords held that the estate of a victim of the Yorkshire Ripper, who – it was averred and assumed – would have been caught by competent detective work in time to prevent her murder, had no claim against the police for negligence. There was no relationship between the victim, as a member of the public, and the police capable of giving rise to a duty of care.


PART.5


Conclusion & observations


“life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the

contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed

beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.”

― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law


What factually is a “Right” ?


A “Right” is a “Legal Claim” Source: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/claim claim 1) v. to make a demand for money, for property, or for

enforcement of a right provided by law. 2) n. the making of a demand (assert a claim) for money

due, for property, for damages or for enforcement of a right. If such a demand is not honoured, it may result in a lawsuit. In order to enforce a right against a government agency (ranging for damages from a negligent bus driver to a shortage in payroll) a claim must be filed first. If rejected or ignored by the government, it is lawsuit time.


Q. Did “Rights” exist prior to the creation of “law” ?


Rights are self defence


What factually is ”Law” ?


Law is solely the organization of the individual right of self-defense which existed before law was formalized. Frederic Bastiat ( The Law )


What then is legislation?

It is an assumption by one man or body of men, of absolute, irresponsible dominion over all other men whom they can subject to their power. It is an assumption by one man or body of men, of a right to subject all other men to their will and service….

Lysander Spooner, ....Natural Law, Natural Justice.


“Law is just an opinion, backed by a gun”…Marc Stevens, Adventures in Legal Land

do not ignore this issue, because it ‘s the only issue


The definition of a “Crime” is ? An involuntary human relationship


What factually is government ?


"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful

master." George Washington


The people who call themselves “Government is nothing more than, organised coercion &

violence

Factually it’s, a group of men and women who in turn award themselves

“political Legal Titles”

Legislators, Judges, Civil Servants, MP’s… etc.


What Factually is the “UK”• 1536 Act of Union between

England• & Wales, 1603 Union of English &

Scottish• Crowns, 1707 Act of Union

between England• & Scotland, 1800 Act of Union of

Ireland &• Britain, 1921 Anglo-Irish Treaty

(Northern• Ireland & Irish Free State [EIRE]• created), 1985 Anglo-Irish

agreement

“Legal Tender” ?

Q. why do they always want it back ?


PART. 6


Dealing with bureaucratic attacks

•Parking Tickets•Speeding & other Traffic, Seat belt …etc.•Fixed Penalty Notices, police/council ? •Council Tax•Income Tax

OTHER !!! QUESTIONS ?


Source Wikipedia:

CAUSE OF ACTION

The fact or combination of facts that gives a person the right to seek judicial redress or relief against another. Also, the legal theory forming the basis of a lawsuit.

The cause of action is the heart of the complaint, which is the Pleading that initiates a lawsuit. Without an adequately stated cause of action the plaintiff's case can be dismissed at the outset. It is not sufficient merely to state that certain events occurred that entitle the plaintiff to relief. All the elements of each cause of action must be detailed in the complaint. The claims must be supported by the facts, the law, and a conclusion that flows from the application of the law to those facts.

A cause of action can arise from an act, a failure to perform a legal obligation, a breach of duty, or a violation or invasion of a right. The importance of the act, failure, breach, or violation lies in its legal effect or characterization and in how the facts and circumstances, considered as a whole, relate to applicable law.


There are three (3) factual “elements”, that must always be present in a “cause of action” .

They apply in both Contract and Tort claims be it either a Criminal or Civil proceeding.

1. Breach of a legal Duty2. Violation of a legal right /

interest3. Damage/Loss and/or injury


A general definition of “action” may be found in Dorosh v. Bentwood Chair & Table Co. (1939)

47 Man. R. 133 at 138 (Man. C.A.):

The word “action”, according to the legal meaning of the term, is a proceeding by which one party seeks in a Court of justice to enforce some right against, or to

restrain the commission of some wrong by, another party.

It includes both civil and criminal proceedings. In its more restricted or popular sense it denotes a civil action commenced by a writ: 1 Halsbury, p. 1, par. 1

It all centres on the violation of a legal right. I like how the Canadian psychopaths admitted it includes criminal proceedings.

Quote: Marc Stevens


End notes & Questions ? Hopefully I have explained the “legal opinions” on

the ?


COUNCIL TAX


Local Government Finance Act 1992

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992


• Justices manual 2009 Complaint p. 1-703 (138)

• Minimum requirements of a fair trial p.1-447a (76)• The minimum requirements for a hearing, are

1. The defendant has to understand what he is said to have done wrong, 2. The court has to be satisfied, that the defendant when he has done wrong, by

act or omission, has the means of knowing it was wrong.3. The defendant has to understand what defences if any, were available to him.4. The defendant has to have a reasonable opportunity to make relevant

representation if he wishes, and 5. The defendant has to have the opportunity to consider what representations

he wishes to make, once he has understood the issues involved.

• Civil proceeding in magistrates courts are started, by the seeking of a complaint, followed by the issue of a summons.

• There is no statutory definition of the term complaint; it is characteristic of a complaint, that it seeks redress for an injury or grievance ‘but rule 4 of the magistrates courts rules, states that it is not necessary for a complaint to be in writing and the issue of a summons is not a requirement of proceedings by way of complaint.

• A Grievance is defined as a “Wrong” i.e. Civil Wrong (Tort)


A Grievance is defined as a “Wrong” i.e. Civil Wrong (Tort) Blacks Law 4th ed states:


Q. WHAT FACTUALLY IS, A BOROUGH ? or COUNTY ?.


Local Government Act 1972 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Local Government Act 1972 (c. 70) is an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom that reformed local government in England and Wales on 1 April 1974.[1]

Its pattern of two-tier metropolitan and non-metropolitan county and district councils remains in use today in large parts of England, although the metropolitan county councils were abolished in 1986, and both county and district councils were replaced with unitary authorities in many areas in the 1990s.In Wales, too, the Act established a similar pattern of counties and districts,[2] but these have since been entirely replaced with a system of unitary authorities.In Scotland, where this Act did not apply, the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 regionalised local government with a system of two-tier regions and districts in 1975 – this was also replaced by a system of unitary council areas in 1996.Elections were held to the new authorities in 1973, and they acted as "shadow authorities" until the handover date. Elections to county councils were held on 12 April, for metropolitan and Welsh districts on 10 May, and for non-metropolitan district councils on 7 June.[3]


04/22/23 No State Project UK - Vince James 73

London Government Act 1963From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe London Government Act 1963 (c. 33) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which recognised officially the conurbation known as Greater London and created a new local government structure for the capital. The Act significantly reduced the number of local government districts in the area, resulting in local authorities responsible for larger areas and populations. The upper tier of local government was reformed to cover the whole of the Greater London area and with a more strategic role; and the split of functions between upper and lower tiers was recast.

The Act classified the boroughs into inner and outer London groups. The City of London and its corporation were essentially unreformed by the legislation. Subsequent amendments to the Act have significantly amended the upper tier arrangements, with the Greater London Council constituted in the legislation replaced by the Greater London Authority. As of 2008, the London boroughs are more or less identical to those created in 1965, although with some enhanced powers over services such as waste management and education.

London Government Act 1963From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The London Government Act 1963 (c. 33) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which recognised officially the conurbation

known as Greater London and created a new local government structure for the capital. The Act significantly reduced the number of local government districts in the area, resulting in local authorities responsible for larger areas

and populations. The upper tier of local government was reformed to cover the whole of the Greater London area and with a more

strategic role; and the split of functions between upper and lower tiers was recast. The Act classified the boroughs into inner and outer

London groups. The City of London and its corporation were essentially unreformed by the legislation. Subsequent amendments to the Act

have significantly amended the upper tier arrangements, with the Greater London Council

constituted in the legislation replaced by the Greater London Authority. As of 2008, the

London boroughs are more or less identical to those created in 1965, although with some

enhanced powers over services such as waste management and education.


What is Borough or County & how was it created

Ask if the “Borough” or “County” is the ground your standing on !

No, then what factually is it?

Yes, what facts prove it exists as a natural phenomena !


Q.1 Are there any witnesses with first hand personal knowledge, that I am a taxpayer, and have an obligation to pay “Council Tax”? Please answer yes or no

Q.2 Is there any admissible evidence, that I am a taxpayer and have an obligation to pay “council tax”? Please answer yes or no.

Q.3 Are the opinions that I am a taxpayer and have an obligation to pay council tax irrefutable? Please answer yes or no.

Q.4 Does the “London Government finance Act” create or impose an obligation or legal duty upon me? Please answer yes or no.

Q.5 Does such an obligation (should it factually exist) require my voluntary cooperation? Please answer yes or no

….Continued.


Council Tax Liability Questions:

Q.6 Can you provide me with evidence the “London Government Finance Act”, applies to me? Please answer yes or no

Q.7 Can you provide me with a factual time, to show how, why, were and when the alleged obligation was created? Please answer Yes or No

Q.8 Are there any witnesses with first hand personal knowledge of this alleged obligation? Please answer Yes or No

Q.9 Does your Complaint/Claim present a “valid cause of action”, to any competent court of law, that has jurisdiction in this matter? Please answer Yes or No

Q.10 Is there any legally admissible evidence to prove such an alleged obligation? Please answer yes or no


11. Is your Complaint in the nature of a “Contract”? Please answer Yes or No

12. Is your Complaint in the nature of a “Tort”? Please answer Yes or No

13. Is the alleged Complaint/Claim factually consistent with the Human Rights Act 1998 ? Please answer Yes or No

14. Has the authorized officer of the council making the complaint against me, made a legal determination that I have an obligation or have a liability to pay “ council tax ?. Please answer Yes or No

15... are the agents who have made a determination that I am liable to pay “Council Tax”, qualified to make legal determinations ? Please answer Yes or No


INCOME TAX


Most fundamental and devastating question to ask:

Q. Is there a factual difference between income & taxable income

???04/22/23 80No State Project UK - Vince James

4 x question approach ? 1. Are there any witnesses with first hand personal knowledge that I am a

tax payer with taxable income, and required to file a tax return? 2. Is there any admissible evidence, that I am a taxpayer and have an

obligation, that I am required to file a tax return and have taxable income. 3. Are the claims that I am a tax payer irrefutable? 4. Are the opinions that I :

am a tax payer have an obligation to file a tax return have taxable income

irrefutable? You have no defence if it’s irrefutable! For any opinion to be valid, it must be based on facts!


PARKING TICKETS


Public NuisancePublic nuisance was defined by Romer LJ in Attorney-General

v PYA Ltd Quarries Ltd (1957) as any nuisance which materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of her majesty’s subject...’ Historically, the crime

of public nuisance covered four broad categories: public decency, public health, convenience and public safety. The

first two are now largely regulated by statute. The latter two are mainly concerned with nuisance on the highway. There

are two key elements in the tort of public nuisance.


A CLASS OF HER MAJESTYS SUBJECTS?

An action in the tort of public nuisance only arises if the nuisance is such to affect a section of the public and not just one person. Whether the number of people affected amounts to a class of people is a question of fact. If the defendant’s nuisance affects a number of people, he may have committed the crime of public nuisance. The Attorney General-General has the power to prosecute.


Typical procedure

Informal & Formal challenges/representation Notice to owner PATAS or NPAS appeal Northampton bulk Centre Transfer to your local county court


What created PATAS / NPAS ?

ANSWER: The Legal Opinion is Road Traffic Act PATAS & NPAS are agencies created by

“Government”? Government agencies ? Councils are also agencies created by government? The same “Act / Statute” that created the alleged

liability also created the alleged “Independent Tribunal Service”?


Questions at appeals tribunals

Ask whom they represent ( are they a government agency ? )

Ask what created them ? ( Road Traffic Act ) Is the ticket factually consistent with the HRA 1998? Is the ( PCO ) qualified to make legal determinations? Did the (PCO) make a legal determination that a

“contravention” had occurred before issuing the issuing the Parking ticket ?


Definition of Independent Independent Not dependent; free; not subject to control by

others; not relying on others; not subordinate; as, few men are wholly independent.


Private Parking Tickets !


A parking charge issued by a private company is not a criminal complaint, there is nothing in criminal law (opinion) to support a penalty or fine for parking on private land. Therefore they are likely misrepresenting themselves by claiming they are PCN’s in the lay sense of the word.

The private parking company is without legal standing, and attempting to use the “law” (opinion) of contract to make a claim for damages is also “without merit”, It has no validity whatsoever, no different from a “Public tort” claim by a council, the only difference being a “council” can back up their legal opinion with Bailiffs ( violence ).

The private operator has no right to recover a parking charge from you without first taking you to court, and even then they are screwed, because they cannot prove factually any alleged contract existed or the “elements” were fulfilled to make it a binding agreement.

If you want to exercise some effective damage control”

IGNORE THEM 04/22/23 90No State Project UK - Vince James

SPEEDING & OTHER TRAFFIC


Do not be confrontational or take a position against them, do not give your own opinions.

Feed their opinions back to them in question form using the 6 friends method.

With practise and understanding as to why you are asking these questions it will soon become second nature.

Each question is worded a specific way to have maximum effect, you question in a way to get the bureucrat to take a position i.e. “the pretence of fairness and objectivity”


Questioning the “Judge”


How to plea I INTEND TO PLEAD GIULTY,BUT BEFORE I CAN DO SO I WISH

TO BE INFORMED AS TO THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ALLEGATIONS MADE AGAINST ME.

Article 6 ECHR reads as follows.

2.Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

3.Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:

(a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;


“Am I entitled to a fair and meaningful hearing” ?

Meaningful, being you will be responsive and answer in substance to my questions ?

“Could I get a fair hearing, if there was a conflict of interest” ?

Who do you “represent” ?


Challenging jurisdiction!

Am I considered innocent of the alleged crime? Please answer yes or no

Answer: Yes.

So am I considered innocent of every element of the alleged crime ?

Jurisdiction is an “element” of a court case; they cannot claim to have the right to hold you against your will, until you have been proven guilty


Why should the “Judge” even “Care” about the claim !

What is the nature & basis relationship between the cop and the judge ?

Q. If there is no relationship, then why do they claim the right to take control of your life and property

Q. Do they not both represent the “Crown” ! Could there possibly a business relationship ! Q. Were does the “Fine” money go to ?


Are you assuming jurisdiction?

Answer: Yes

Please show me, how, were, why and when your alleged jurisdiction was acquired. Did this jurisdiction over me require my consent?

Apart from coercion and violence, how was your jurisdiction acquired !


“NATURE OF THE CLAIM”

IS THIS CLAIM IN THE NATURE OF A ......?

1. Tort

Or

2. Contract


Am I being accused of breaching a “legal duty” ? Please answer Yes or No

Am I being accused of violating anybody's “Rights”? Please answer Yes or No


Cross examining the copper

Did you file a valid cause of action against me ? please answer Yes or No

Answer: Yes

How many elements are their in a cause of action ?


Are you an expert in the interpretation and application of the RTA 1991 ?

Please answer Yes or No

YES

What are those qualifications ?


Did the police officer make a legal determination when accusing you of

speeding ?


If the officer does not know or understand how, what, why, where and when the ( RTA ) became applicable to you or anyone else then:

How can he claim to have filed a valid cause of action ?

How can he prove he was qualified to make a legal determination ?


Who does the judge represent Nobody ! State ! Are you here on your own authority and not

the crowns ! Who pays your wages? Were does the fine money go ! i.e. back to the

state, who in turn pays the judge ! Be it their expenses or otherwise

Explain to me how that is not a conflict of interest.


Q. How to question a bureaucrat, ask ? Do you hold an Objective standard of proof

“Law” = “legal opinion” is about as “subjective” as you can get.


On the spot fines , Police or Council !

Same process as dealing with all claims civil or criminal, do not argue and risk being thrown in a cage or arrested and physically harmed, just take the ticket / notice and deal with it in court


Loans & debts

Chain of title. Securitization report. C.U.S.I.P. & I.S.I.N. Numbers. Was it their own “money”, that funded the

loan?


WERE DO WE GO FROM HERE ?

MAKING YOUR OWN CLAIMSHUMAN RIGHTS ACT AS A TOOL


The End,

• Thank you for listening and taking part.

• Any Questions?


presented by : vincent james nsp research group (british isles)

Documents

american legal system

legal land

legal opinion

legal reality

legal systemanswer

actual facts

marcs approach

marcs book work