presented by: nathan biggs inge esping amy regier kenny waddell

30
1 Student and Parent Perspectives of Effective Discipline Practices Regarding Repeated School Misbehaviors Presented By: Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy Regier Kenny Waddell

Upload: hue

Post on 24-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Student and Parent Perspectives of Effective Discipline Practices Regarding Repeated School Misbehaviors. Presented By: Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy Regier Kenny Waddell. Agenda. Historical Perspective. Problem Statement & Research Question. Literature Review. Methodology. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

1

Student and Parent Perspectives of Effective Discipline Practices Regarding Repeated School Misbehaviors

Presented By: Nathan BiggsInge EspingAmy RegierKenny Waddell

Page 2: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

2

Agenda

Historical Perspective

Problem Statement & Research Question

Literature Review

Methodology

2

Page 3: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

3

Agenda

Data Analysis

Results

Conclusions

Recommendations

3

Page 4: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

4

4

Historical Perspective

Page 5: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

5

Historical Perspective

Page 6: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

6

6

Problem Statement & Research Question

Page 7: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

7

Problem Statement

Forms of exclusionary discipline often do not deter students with repeated misbehaviors. 

Page 8: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

8

Research Questions

What are student and parent perspectives on exclusionary discipline (i.e. office referrals, in-school suspension [ISS], out-of-school suspension [OSS]) in lessening repeated misbehaviors?

What do students and parents perceive as effective alternatives to students who do not respond to traditional exclusionary discipline?

Page 9: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

9

9

Literature Review

Page 10: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

10

Literature Review

Methods of School Exclusionary Discipline• Verbal Reprimands• Time Outs• Detentions• In/Out School Suspension• Expulsion

Page 11: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

11

Literature Review continued

Students removed from classroom• “Teachable moments” to connect and build

relationships are often missed

• Give non-disruptive students ability to focus more

• Give more time for administration to confront individual behavior issues

Page 12: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

12

Literature Review continued

Positive Behavioral Support Strategy• An alternative to exclusionary discipline• Effective for students with emotional & behavior

problems • Opportunities to build relationships with students

and families• Encourages more contact with parents before

the exclusionary discipline stage

Page 13: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

13

13

Methodology

Page 14: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

14

Methodology

Page 15: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

15

15

Data Analysis

Page 16: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

16

Question 1: Why do you believe students get sent to the office repeatedly for the same or varying behaviors?

Parents

Disrupting the classroomStudents are labeledConflicting personalitiesLack of teacher behavior

management trainingLack of student control

Students

Teacher behaviorNot following directionsGetting into troubleNot doing what the

teacher asksNot learning from

mistakes

Page 17: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

17

Question 2: Traditional school consequences like suspensions and detentions work with some students. How does receiving a consequence from the office prevent the behavior from happening again? What could be done differently?

Yes

No Students0

0.51

1.52

2.53

3.54

4.55

ParentsStudents

Parents

Page 18: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

18

Question 2: Traditional school consequences like suspensions and detentions work with some students. How does receiving a consequence from the office prevent the behavior from happening again? What could be done differently?

20%NOT SURE

20%NOT EFFECTIVE

60%REWARD

Page 19: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

19

0/10 9/10

Positive NegativeBoth

1/10

Question 3: When you receive phone calls or emails home from teachers or administrators about your student, whatis most often the reason?

Page 20: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

20

Question 4: What do you feel would be the best ways to prevent repeated misbehaviors?

Parents Students

Page 21: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

21

Question 5: How often does someone from the school call/email/etc. about a positive happening at school that your student has been involved in?

ParentsStudents

Never Sometimes Often

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3

2

1

3

1

0

Page 22: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

22

Question 6: Do you know if any of your student’s teachers have tried to build a relationship with your student? What have they done to build a relationship? What would you like to see a teacher do to help build a relationship with your student?

YesNo

Students

80%YES

20%NO

Page 23: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

23

Question 6: Have teachers tried to build relationships?

YesOnly 1 TeacherNot Sure

Parents

40% YES

40% YESONLY ONE TEACHER

20%NOT SURE

Page 24: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

24

24

Results

Page 25: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

25

Results

• Students were sent to the office for a multitude of infractions• Students felt that traditional consequences are effective, but all parents

disagreed• Three to five parents specifically stated that suspensions are a “reward”• Eighty percent of respondents (both parents and students) felt that a

teacher has tried to form a relationshipTwo parents noted that only one teacher has tried to form a relationship

• Parents felt that there is little positive communication between home and school

One parent felt stated communication only comes from one teacherAnother parent questions the sincerity of the communication

Page 26: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

26

Results

• Our research showed there are a variety of opinions on the effectiveness of traditional consequences

• Our research also suggests that building strong relationships and developing trust between students and teachers is a keystone to successful behavior interventions

Page 27: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

27

27

Recommendations

Page 28: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

28

Recommendations

• Increase communication between school and families

• Ensure positive communication with families is taking place

• Create a school environment with a more individualized approach to discipline for students who have repeated misbehaviors

Page 29: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

29

Recommendations

• A data driven dialogue, engaging all stakeholders, should take place on how to effectively use discipline in the school

• Administrators should work with teachers to improve their classroom environment with the aim of reducing discipline issues and providing additional behavior management strategies

Page 30: Presented By:     Nathan Biggs Inge Esping Amy  Regier Kenny Waddell

30

30

Questions from Audience