presented at ucsd science studies program colloquium series, january 30, 2006 san diego, ca
DESCRIPTION
Standardization in Ecology: Enacting the Ecological Metadata Language. Florence Millerand Post-doctoral Fellow Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition / Scripps Institution of Oceanography phy University of California, San Diego. Presented at UCSD Science Studies Program Colloquium Series, - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Presented at UCSD Science Studies Program Colloquium Series,January 30, 2006San Diego, CA
Florence MillerandPost-doctoral FellowLaboratory of Comparative Human Cognition / Scripps Institution
of OceanographyphyUniversity of California, San Diego
Standardization in Ecology:Enacting the Ecological Metadata Language
Comparative Interoperability project NSF/Human and Social dynamics (2004-2007)
interoperability.ucsd.edu
Geoffrey C. BowkerCenter for Science, Technology & SocietySanta Clara University
Karen S. BakerScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San Diego
Florence MillerandLCHC/Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San Diego
David RibesSociology/Science StudiesUniversity of California, San Diego
SSHRCCRSH
Outline :
1. A Research Community in Ecology:The Long Term Ecological Research Network (LTER) The EML Standard
2. StorieS about a Standardization Process:“EML is a success” / “EML is not yet a success”
3. An Enactment Perspective:Trajectories alignment From the Standard Adoption to its Enactment
4. Conclusion
Long Term Ecological Research Network (LTER)
Long Term Ecological Research Network (LTER)
Palmer Station - PAL-Biome: Pelagic marine
Central Arizona - CAP- Biome: Urban/Desert
Jornada Basin - JRN-Biome: Hot desert
Luquillo - LUQ-Biome: Tropical rain forest
Arctic - ARC-Biome: Arctic tundra
Konza Prairie - KNZ
- Biome: Tall grass prairie
California Current Ecosystem (CCE)-Biome: Coastal upwelling
(located at Scripps Institution of Oceanography)
LTER: Diversity of disciplinesAgronomyAnimal BehaviorAnimal EcologyAnimal Physiological EcologyAnimal Population BiologyAnimal SystematicsAnthropologyEquatic EcologyAtmospheric ScienceBehavioral EcologyBiogeochemistryBiogeographyBiological DiversityBiologyBotanyChemical EcologyClimatologyCommunity EcologyComputer ScienceConservation BiologyDisturbance EcologyEcological ComplexityEcological Modeling
Ecosystem Ecology Entomology Environmental EducationEnvironmental LawEnvironmental PolicyEnvironmental/Ressource ManagementEpidemiologyEstuarine EcologyForest EcologyForestryGeographyGeologyGIS/Remote SensingHabitat preservation/RestorationHuman EcologyHydrologyInformaticsInformation TechnologyInvertebrate BiologyLandscape EcologyLimnologyMarine Ecology
Microbial EcologyMicrobiologyNutrient FluxesOceanographyPaleoclimatologyPaleoecologyPlant EcologyPlant Physiological EcologyPlant Population BiologyPlant SystematicsPlant-Animal InteractionsPopulation BiologyPopulation GeneticsRange/Grazing EcologySociologySoil ScienceStatistical EcologyStatisticsTheoretical Population BiologyTrace Gas FluxesVegetation EcologyWetlands EcologyWildlife BiologyZoology
Mission of the Long Term Ecological Research Network
• Understanding general ecological phenomena that occur over long temporal and broad spatial scales
• Conducting major synthesis and theoretical efforts
• Providing information for the identification and solution of societal problems
• Creating a legacy of well-designed and documented long-term experiments and observations for use by future generations
• Understanding general ecological phenomena that occur over long temporal and broad spatial scales
• Conducting major synthesis and theoretical efforts
• Providing information for the identification and solution of societal problems
• Creating a legacy of well-designed and documented long-term experiments and observations for use by future generations
Mission of the Long Term Ecological Research Network
PALEOECOLOGY & LIMNOLOGY
LTER
MOSTECOLOGY
RESEARCH SCALES
• Evolution ofSpecies
• Bog Succession• Forest Community
Migration• Species Invasion• Forest Succession
• CulturalEutrophication
• Hare Population• Prairie Population
• Annual Plants• Plankton
Succession
• Algal bloom• Diel Migration
YEARS PHYSICAL
RESET EVENTS BIOLOGICAL
PHENOMENA
105
104
103
102
101
100
10-1
10-2
10-3
100 MILLENNIA
10 MILLENNIA
MILLENNIUM
CENTURY
DECADE
YEAR
MONTH
DAY
HOUR
• ContinetalGlacition
• Climate Change
• Forest Fires• CO2 Climate
Warming• Sun Spot Cycle• El Nino
• Prairie Fires• Lake Turnover• Ocean Upwelling
• Storms• Diel Light Cycle• Tides
LTER research covers time scales from months to centuries
Research over broad spatial scales– Comparisons between ecosystems across regional, continental, and global gradients
AREA (m2) RESEARCH PROGRAMS
1014 GLOBAL
1012 CONTINET
1010 REGION
108 LANDSCAPE
106 LANDSCAPE
104 PLOT, PATCH
102 PLOT, PATCH
100 SAMPLE POINTS
GLOBAL SCIENCES (IGBP) LTER
MOSTECOLOGY
CONTINENT LTER
• Understanding general ecological phenomena that occur over long temporal and broad spatial scales
• Conducting major synthesis and theoretical efforts
• Providing information for the identification and solution of societal problems
• Creating a legacy of well-designed and documented long-term experiments and observations for use by future generations
Mission of the Long Term Ecological Research Network
• Understanding general ecological phenomena that occur over long temporal and broad spatial scales
• Conducting major synthesis and theoretical efforts
• Providing information for the identification and solution of societal problems
• Creating a legacy of well-designed and documented long-term experiments and observations for use by future generations
Mission of the Long Term Ecological Research Network
Data Managemen
t
LTER Science Trajectory
• 1980-1990 Decade of long-term research
• 1990-2000 Decade of large scale research
• 2000-2010 Decade of synthesis
LTER Science Trajectory
LTER Science Trajectory
The importance of cross-site synthesis:
“The power of the network approach of the LTER program rests in the ability to compare similar processes (e.g., primary production or decomposition of organic matter) under different ecological conditions. As a result, LTER scientists should be able to understand how fundamental ecological processes operate at different rates and in different ways under different environmental conditions”
(Risser Report, 1993).
• 1980-1990 Decade of long-term research
• 1990-2000 Decade of large scale research
• 2000-2010 Decade of synthesis
LTER Science Trajectory
The importance of cross-site synthesis:
“The power of the network approach of the LTER program rests in the ability to compare similar processes (e.g., primary production or decomposition of organic matter) under different ecological conditions. As a result, LTER scientists should be able to understand how fundamental ecological processes operate at different rates and in different ways under different environmental conditions”
(Risser Report, 1993).
• 1980-1990 Decade of long-term research
• 1990-2000 Decade of large scale research
• 2000-2010 Decade of synthesis
The need for a Network Information System:
“Modern ecology requires increased access to data and metadata distributed across multiple sites for synthesis and integration across broad spatial and temporal scales.”
Trajectory refers to:
“(1) the course of any phenomenon as it evolves over time and (2) the actions and interactions contributing to its evolution. That is, phenomenon do not automatically unfold nor are they straightforwardly determined by economic, political, cultural, or other circumstances, they are in part shaped by the interactions of concerned actors.”
(Strauss, 1993, 53-54)
The development of information infrastructure at the intersection of ‘social worlds’ (Strauss)
From EML adoption to its implementation
When implementing EML means more than doing ‘implementation’ work
ENACTM
ENT
To implement EML doesn’t only consist in upgrading a preexisting technical system; it also and mostly consists in redefining the sociotechnical infrastructure that upholds this tangle of technical, social and scientific practices. Yet these redefinitions have important consequences at the social and organization level.
Because the technologies are intimately tied to the local structures of work, because the EML standard works in a specific configuration (technical, social and organizational), its enactment requires changes of infrastructural kind.
- Millerand, F., and Bowker, G.C. (forthcoming). Metadata Standards. Trajectories and Enactment in the Life of an Ontology. In S.L.Star and M.Lampland (Eds), Formalizing Practices: Reckoning with Standards, Numbers and Models in Science and Everyday Life
- Millerand, F. and Bowker, G.C. (forthcoming). Metdata Trajectoires et <<enaction >>. In C. Rosental (Ed.), Sciences socials et cognition. Paris: Editions de l”EHESS, Coll. Enquete.