Presented at th

e FIG Congress 2018,

May 6-11, 2018 in

Ista

nbul, Turkey

Developing Model of Agriculture Land Consolidation As a

tool to recover from Industrial Liquid Waste Pollution

Hazards (9311)

Bambang Edhi Leksono

Muhammad Ihsan

Geodesy and Geomatic Engineering Program

Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology

Institut Teknologi Bandung

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Background

Chemical

Elements

Content

within soil in

(ppm)

Quality

standard of

Soil (ppm)

(Alloway)

Above the

quality

standard

Cu 43,00 – 83,00 60 – 125 Yes

Zn 57,00 – 137,00 70 – 400 Yes

Pb 8,73 – 22,76 100 – 400 No

Cd 0,05 – 0,19 3 – 8 No

Cr 0,78 – 24,93 75 – 100 No

Ni 13,75 – 20,53 100 No

Government

IndustrySociety

Research Area in Ranca

Ekek district

Mineral Condition in

Agruculture soil

Stake Holders in Land

Consolidation

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

PROBLEMS

• What effort shoul be done to recover the industrial liquid waste hazard

with hgh level efficiency?

• What is the role of community development to overcome the hazard of

liquid waste?

• What methods and land consolidation model which appropriate to solve

the liquid waste hazard related to the characteristics of environment in

areas contaminated as well as the legal aspects of the land tenure?

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

OBJECTIVES

• To generate liquid waste hazard mitigation solutions in order to improve

water quality and productivity of agriculture (recovery from disaster)

• To generate the appropriate consolidation model with the characteristics

of the environment in areas contaminated as well as based on the legal

aspects and the environment

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Liquid PollutionAgriculture land

DamageFitoremediation Need the lands

Land Consolidation requestVerificationModel Development

Society DisscussionCost of

development from

Industry (CSR)

Land Sertification

Local GovernmentUniversity involment

Industri

Society

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

FITOREMEDIATION

Agriculture Land Consolidation Agriculture Land Consolidation in this research

There are Community involvement

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Combination of Knowledge Based

Method with Geographical Information

System

DATA

Combination of

Knowledge Based

Method with GIS

Geografis

Hydrology and

Environment

Agriculture

Land

MODEL

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Fitoremediation by developing of Constructed Wetland

Descrıptıon Value Data sources

Constanta 5,2 Standard constanta for Agriculture

land less than 2,2 ha (Wetland

International, 2003)

Qd (average debit of liquid

pollution (m3 d-1))

520,67 Computation result by metods of FJ.

Mock

Co (average content of BOD5 (mg l-

1))

147 mg/L Research Result by Nurhaeni (2011)

Ct (threshold content BOD5 (mg l-1)) 60 mg/L Liquid Polution Standard BOD5 from

Environmental regulation No.5 year

2014

Ah = KQd (ln Co - ln Ct)

Formula Reed

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Site Selection of Agriculture Land ConsolidationSimple Irigation

Near the polluted river

Land ownership data

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Analisis Water Supply and Water Demand

0.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

8.000

9.000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Deb

it (

m³/

s)

Comparison of Main Debit and Debit Needed

Debit andalan (m³/s)

Debit kebutuhan (m³/s)

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Constructed Wetland

Luas : 2426,14 m²

Kedalaman : 0,6 m

Lebar : 28,44 m

1. Plantation Hyper A1

2. Plantation Hyper A 2

3. Platation Hyper A3

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Model 1

• Same Procentage of STUP (Contribution of Land for development)

• Parcel design with the same area per ownership

Model 2

• Same Procentage of STUP (Contribution of Land for development)

• Parcel design per ownership

Model 3

• STUP Area with a distance weight from parcel to parcel

• Percel design per ownership

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

50.00 52.00 54.00 56.00 58.00 60.00

1

3

Endin

98.00 100.00 102.00 104.00 106.00 108.00 110.00 112.00 114.00 116.00

1

3

Musa

80.00 82.00 84.00 86.00 88.00 90.00 92.00 94.00

1

3

H.Omo

120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 140.00 145.00 150.00 155.00

1

Permata

190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00 210.00 215.00 220.00

1

3

Kahatex

485.00 490.00 495.00 500.00 505.00 510.00 515.00 520.00

1

3

H Cicih

520.00 525.00 530.00 535.00 540.00 545.00 550.00 555.00 560.00

1

3

H.Mahfudin

1000.00 1010.00 1020.00 1030.00 1040.00 1050.00 1060.00 1070.00 1080.00

1

3

H.Endan

1290.00 1300.00 1310.00 1320.00 1330.00 1340.00 1350.00

1

Koseng

Area comparison of STUP among Model

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

9.00%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Permata H.Omo Endin Kahatex H.Mahfudin H Cicih H.Endan Koseng Musa

Dıstance Comparıson and Presentage of STUP Model 3Jarak Presentase

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

0.00

2000.00

4000.00

6000.00

8000.00

10000.00

12000.00

14000.00

16000.00

18000.00

20000.00

Endin Musa H.Omo Permata Kahatex H Cicih H.Mahfudin H.Endan Koseng

Area comparison among Model

Luas Awal (m²) Model1 Model2 Model 3

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

1 1 1

2

3

5

8

20

29

1 1 1

2

3

5

8

20

29

1 1 1

2 2

6

5

8

10

2

1

2 2

3 3

5

6

10

E N D IN MU S A H .OMO P E R MA T A K A H A T E X H C IC IH H .MA H F U D IN H .E N D A N K OS E N G

COMPARISON OF TOTAL PARCEL NUMBERS

Jumlah Persil Awal Jumlah Persil Model1 Jumlah Persil Model2 Jumlah Persil Model 3

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Model Advantage Disadvantage

Model 1 1. Percentage of STUP is uniform

2. Number of parcel constant

3. the parcels distributed with same

area (water distribution equal)

1. The parcels are dispersed

2. Parcel design not in good order

Model 2 1. Percentage of STUP uniform

2. Parcel area become larger

3. Good parcel design n not

distributed

1. Less number of parcels

Model 3 1. Percentage of STUP based on the

water quality distribution

2. Percel area become larger

3. Good parcel design n not distributed

1. Percentage of STUP not uniform

2. Need more study & socialization

regarding to weighted of parcel

distribution.

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Impact of Remediation and Consolidation

Impact Before After Description

Environment (Content of BOD5) 147 60 Deminishing of 59%

Agriculture Production (Paddy) 0,6 ton 2,5 ton Improvement of 400%

Income (per hectare) Rp 3.069.600 Rp 12.790.000 improvement 400%

Legal aspect of land tenure Letter C (Girik)Ownership Title

Sertificate of LandSecurity Tenure

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Conclusion

• Development of constructed wetland is needed to reduce the polluted liquid waste of industry within the Agriclture area.

• Location of Agriculture Consolidation has 5,8 hectares with number of parcel lands of 70 and belong to 9 owners. The need of land remediation only for 0.4 hectares, so that the rest of consolidated area is 5,3 hectares.

• Base on this consolidation model, there are 3 different model approaches, where model 1 and 2, every parcel gave contribution of 7 persen of total area origin, where the model 3, contributed area differently between 6-8%, because of the parcel distance weighted method was applied to the distance of remediation land.

• Base on the areal analisis and STUP, model 3 is an proper model regarding to the wisdon of water qualitiy distribution. The parcel design of model 3 using the block of ownership system where parcels location are more proper irrigated.

• The effort to recover industrial waste liquid pollution hazard to agriculture area, the development of landremediation is very important role to recover the environment :

– reduced the content of BOD5 around 59%)

– improving the society walfare with the district

– Improving agriculture production and

– Security of land tenure by applying the ownership title related to the land properties.

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Recomendation

• Need to study more comprehensively in Fitoremediation and Constructed

Wetland Development in Rancaekek District

• For the maximum advantage, the development of Fitoremediation can be

distributed to most agriculture area. Because need to get STUP for more

larger areal of agriculture development.

Kamis, 23 Juni 2016

Thank You

FIG 2018

Istanbul

Turkey