presentation to the providence school board january 14, 2013 federal budget overview

12
Presentation to the Providence School Board January 14, 2013 Federal Budget Overview

Upload: laurel-fleming

Post on 03-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Presentation to the Providence School Board

January 14, 2013

Federal Budget Overview

FY12-13 Context for Federal Budget

PPSD VISION AND MISSIONVISION: The Providence Public School

District will be a national leader in educating urban youth.

MISSION: The Providence Public School District will prepare all students to succeed in the nation’s colleges and universities, and in their chosen professions.

FY12-13 Context for Federal Budget

PPSD STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESS Engaged Students and Families.

-Provide all students and families with access to excellent schools and prepare all students for success in their post-secondary endeavors.

Highly Effective Educators.-Promote high expectations and support and support the growth and development of teachers, leaders, and staff.

Student-Centered Instruction. -Implement a rigorous and engaging curriculum and provide rich learning opportunities at all grade levels and in all content areas.

Systems that Work. -Build, refine, and create systems that support high-quality teaching and learning.

Collaborative Community. -Foster rich and meaningful partnerships with members of district community promoting a shared investment in Providence’s youth.

Federal Budget as Percentage of PPSD Funds

Federal $58,150,663

(13%)

Total Budget, $387,226,619

(87%)

Federal Funds as Percentage of Total Budget

Federal Total Budget

Note: Local Budget = $329,075,956

FY13-14: Challenges

Federal budget expected to be lower next year than this year Funding for federal programs is determined by using the most recent population and poverty

counts of children residing in each jurisdiction, as determined by the by U.S. Census. The amount of funding each district receives is influenced by the change in the poverty level in

each district as compared to the change in poverty levels of the entire nation; thus, a rise in poverty levels in non-urban school districts would result in a reduction in the amount of funding in urban areas as the same amount of national funding must be shared with a larger number of districts.

Funding notification from RIDE typically occurs in March or April of each year

Fourteen (14) more schools identified as being in need of intervention

Staffing: Over reliance on federal funding for administrative positions

Sequestration: The automatic across-the-board cuts for most federal programs and activities have been delayed for two months The mini-deal between Congress and the Administration resolves many of the tax portions of the

Fiscal Cliff, but delays the spending cut portions of the Fiscal Cliff for another two months. 8.2% projected cuts in education across all titled funds , but delayed to take effect until the FY13-

14 year.

“Supplement, Not Supplant”

What does “Supplement, Not Supplant” mean?

federal funds must enhance or increase the level of funding which is normally available from state or local sources;

federal funds must not replace state and local funds.

Federal Funding Sources – CRP

Funding Source

PurposeFY12

AllocationsFY13 Allocations Change from ‘12

Title IImproving the academic

achievement of disadvantaged students

$ 22,076,259 $ 20,749,365 $ (1,326,894)Title II

Teacher Quality/Class Size

$ 3,650,626 $ 3,564,925 $ (85,701)Title III

Limited English Proficient

$ 889,356 $ 1,011,374 $ 122,018IDEA Special Education $ 6,665,400 $ 6,463,952 $(201,448)IDEA

PreschoolSpecial Education $ 207,196 $ 205,457 $ (1,739)

TOTAL: $33,488,837 $ 31,995,073 $ (1,493,764)Note: Roughly $700K go to private school services

Federal funds can be used to:

Federal funds cannot be used to:

Fund “supplementary” programs;

Fund “supplementary” materials and staff; and

Fund programs that specifically support students with the greatest academic need.

Federal funds should be used to carry out activities in the School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Federal funds cannot be used to:

Carry out activities that are required by State law, regulations or union contracts;

Replace or rehire teaching positions or local other activities that have been cut; or

Purchase “core” materials or services for students and classrooms;

Use of Federal Funds

Title I Required Reserves

Funds Previously Reserved for Choice/Supplemental Education Services – 20% of total allocation (Note: The U.S. Department of Education approved Rhode Island’s request for flexibility under NCLB; the 20% set aside must be used to support district improvement strategies on the needs of schools identified as Priority, Focus, or Warning schools ).

Professional Development – 10% for districts/schools in need of improvement

Parental Involvement – not less than 1%, 95% of the 1% must be distributed to schools

Private School Services – sufficient for the provision of equitable services as compared to Providence students, to include parental involvement services

Neglected/Delinquent Youth – as necessary to provide comparable services; PSD reserves $15K for additional services to students living in neglected facilities

Homeless Services – not required, however PSD sets aside approx. $10K-$15K to provide additional services to support students experiencing homelessness

Focus of the FY13 CRP

Implementation of key district strategies and initiatives to create dramatic positive improvement in student outcomes:

I. Curriculum , Instruction & Assessmento Rigorous and relevant curricula aligned to performance standards for K-12 instructiono Transition to Common Core in English language artso Research-based instructional programs, strategies, practices and toolso Comprehensive Assessment System which supports screening, progress monitoring, benchmarking,

and end-of-course assessments of student learning across time

II. Student Supports and Services o Multi-tiered Support System providing Academic and Social/Emotional programs and interventions o Programs to support English Language Learnerso Virtual Credit Recovery and Learning Recoveryo Transition Supports and Programs

III. Aligned and Differentiated Professional Developmento Comprehensive, ongoing training aligned to district initiatives and targeted school-based needso Educator evaluation supports o Master Schedule Process Improvement Partnership

IV. School Intervention and Innovation Initiatives o Lead partners and EMOs provide direct support and oversight of clusters of schools

V. Expanded Learning Opportunitieso Investing in innovations that promote in-school and out-of-school learning opportunities

Federal Funding Sources – Other Allocations

Funding Source Purpose FY12 Allocations FY13 Allocation

Perkinsto develop more fully the academic,

career, and technical skills of secondary and postsecondary students who elect to

enroll in CTE programs

$ 1,357,084 $ 1,193,198SIG 1003(a)

to provide support to schools that have missed Adequate Yearly Progress by providing resources to help schools

overcome barriers to improving academic performance

$ 1,309,200.00 $1,817,500SIG 1003 (g) –

Cohort 1 to provide public school districts with additional funds and resources to assist

their persistently lowest-achieving schools

$ 3,972,909.99 *$3,680,040SIG 1003(g) –

Cohort 2$ 1,101,406.00 **$1,101,406

RTTT

Supports state and district initiatives in the following areas: curriculum and instruction, instructional management system, educator evaluation, human capital management, and

school transformation

$ 18,363,446($9,311,282 is the direct allocation to the district covering 4 year grant period)*Budget submitted; awaiting final approval **Awaiting final verification from RIDE

Overview of All Federal Funding

Title I20,749,365

Title II3,564,925

Title III; 1,011,374IDEA, Part B; 6,463,952IDEA preschool; 205,457Perkins; 1,193,198

SIG A 1,817,500

SIG (G) Cohort13,680,040

SIG (G) Cohort2 1,101,406

RTTT18,363,446