preparing for the state systemic improvement plan
DESCRIPTION
Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan. Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum). First thoughts …. Overview. Part of the SPP/APR Comprehensive, ambitious yet achievable Plan for improving results for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Virginia - March 2014(Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum)
Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan
First thoughts …
OverviewPart of the SPP/APRComprehensive, ambitious yet achievablePlan for improving results for infants and toddlers
with disabilities and their familiesMulti-year plan developed in two phasesMust engage stakeholders in the process
4
Focus for Improvement
Data Analysis•In-depth Analysis of
Quantitative and Qualitative Data Related to Primary Concern Area
to Confirm Focus Area for Improvement
Infrastructure Analysis•In-depth Analysis of
Quantitative and Qualitative Data Related to Primary Concern Area
to Confirm Focus Area for Improvement
Phase I Components
What is the problem?
Data Analysis•Broad Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data to Identify
Areas of Low and High Performance
Infrastructure Analysis•Broad Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data to Identify
Systemic Issues Impacting Performance
Why is it happening?
Theory of Action
What will we do about it?
Data AnalysisIdentify and analyze key data to determine areas
for improvementDisaggregate data as neededLook at data qualityDetermine any compliance issues that are barriers
Start BROADIdentify areas of high and low performanceIdentify potential focus area for improvement
Variety of Data SourcesQuantitative Data
SPP/APR data, Section 618 data (child count, etc.)Other data related to infants and toddlers (Health,
DOE, Infant Mental Health, etc.)Qualitative Data
Feedback from VICCFocus groupsSurveys
Infrastructure AnalysisAnalyze capacity of system to support
improvement and build capacity in EI programs and providers to implement EBP to improve results for infants, toddlers, families
Analyze initiatives in state that can have impact on infants, toddlers, families
Describe how decisions are made within state system and representatives that must be involved in planning for systemic improvements
Start BROAD – “big picture” view
System Components
Primary Area of ConcernArea(s) in which there is lower performance and, if
addressed, could have most impact on outcomes for children and families
Factors to consider in prioritizing:Magnitude of concernEquity issueAgency prioritiesLeveraging of resourcesFeasibility/doability
Becomes the potential focus area of improvement for the SSIP
Focus for Improvement
Data Analysis•In-depth Analysis of
Quantitative and Qualitative Data Related to Primary Concern Area
to Confirm Focus Area for Improvement
Infrastructure Analysis•In-depth Analysis of
Quantitative and Qualitative Data Related to Primary Concern Area
to Confirm Focus Area for Improvement
Phase I Components
What is the problem?
Data Analysis•Broad Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data to Identify
Areas of Low and High Performance
Infrastructure Analysis•Broad Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data to Identify
Systemic Issues Impacting Performance
Why is it happening?
Theory of Action
What will we do about it?
In-Depth Data and Infrastructure AnalysisFocus on the primary area of concernPurpose: Identify focus for improvement and
determine the systemic issues that need improvement (contributing factors, root causes)
Ask more specific questions based on findings from broad analysis
May need to collect more data but don’t overdo itConsider qualitative data
Focus for ImprovementThe area of improvement on which the State
will focus, that will lead to a measurable child or family result
How addressing this area of focus for improvement will build local systems’ capacity to improve the identified result for children and families
“Good” Focus for Improvement• Is supported by the data• Will make a significant impact on results• Aligns with current priorities and initiatives• Will (has potential to) leverage resources• Addresses issues of disparate outcomes• Is supported by leadership• Has the necessary commitment to change• Is feasible/doable (2-4 years)
Examples of Focus AreaImproving social emotional outcomes for
children with autismImproving families’ ability to help their child
develop and learnImproving social emotional outcomes for
children with disabilities
Focus for Improvement
Data Analysis•In-depth Analysis of
Quantitative and Qualitative Data Related to Primary Concern Area
to Confirm Focus Area for Improvement
Infrastructure Analysis•In-depth Analysis of
Quantitative and Qualitative Data Related to Primary Concern Area
to Confirm Focus Area for Improvement
Phase I Components
What is the problem?
Data Analysis•Broad Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data to Identify
Areas of Low and High Performance
Infrastructure Analysis•Broad Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data to Identify
Systemic Issues Impacting Performance
Why is it happening?
Theory of Action
What will we do about it?
Theory of ActionDescribe the general improvement strategies that
will need to be carried out and the outcomes that will need to be met
A series of if-then statementsMake connection between what you are doing
(Improvement Strategy) and what you expect to happen (Results)
Focus on how and why you will produce the change, using “if-then” statements to generate a logical explanation (Rationale) and reveal strategies and assumptions about how resources and activities are used
ExampleIf I eat just before going to the grocery store, then
I will be full and not craving a sugary treat while shopping.
If I’m full and not craving a sugary treat while shopping, then I’ll be able to resist buying candy at the checkout
If I can resist buying candy at the grocery store, then I won’t have candy around the house
If I don’t have candy around the house, I will eat less candy
resultresult
Implementation
of effective practices
Improved outcomes for children and
families
What do we know about how practices need to look in order to achieve the outcomes?
resultresult
Implementation
of effective practices
Improved outcomes for children and
families
What do we know about how the system needs to look in order to support the practices?
Relationships between Levels of the System to Achieve Results
Phase I: •Conduct infrastructure analysis to identify system strengths and barriers•Conduct root cause analysis to identify contributing factors
Phase I and II: •Search/evaluate evidence- based solutions (Exploration Phase)•Develop Theory of Action•Develop and implement plan for improvement (Implementation Framework)
Phase I: •Initiate data analysis•Identify problem area (Focus for Improvement, e.g. child outcomes for low income children)
Phase III: •Evaluate progress annually•Adjust plan as needed
What is the
problem?
SSIPSSIP
Source: Western Regional Resource Center.
Virginia SSIP Development
Virginia SSIP Development
The C in Part C is for …