prepared by - humanitarianresponse · in repairing process and ensuring proper documentation. in...

Report on Needs Assessment conducted within the UNICEF funded project “Improving resilience of communities through support to decentralized water system and providing access to safe water in Novoaidarsky, Popasniansky and Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayons of Lugansk Oblast GCA”

2018

Prepared by: Mamyrzhan Abdullaev, Project Manager/Head of Severodonetsk Office Severodonetsk, Ukraine November, 2018

2

Acknowledgements This report has been made possible through the financial support from UNICEF.

This report would not have been possible without the kind support and help of key informants: local authorities, community leaders, administrations of institutions and representatives of Popasnyansky Vodokanal. We would like to extend our sincere thanks to all of them.

We would like to express our gratitude towards UNICEF team, Viktoriia Lupan and Andrii Solonenko, who were regularly providing their support during the process of needs assessment. We are also grateful to REACH team for assisting with preparation of the needs assessment map. We are highly indebted to Natalia Alfimova, M&E Officer of arche noVa, for professional assistance in data analysis. We would like to show our warm thank to Katarzyna Zwolak, Head of Mission of arche noVa, and Ewa Klimuk, Head of Programs, for reviewing the report and providing recommendations to improve it. Finally, our thanks and appreciates should go to arche noVa team involved in the assessment process:

- Andrii Krivchenkov (Technical Coordinator);

- Yaroslav Stetsyk (Deputy Project Coordinator);

- Marina Vitvitska (Engineer);

- Aleksandr Tupikin (Engineer);

- Anna Chupryna (M&E Officer).

The needs assessment results will be used to provide repair assistance for the most

vulnerable communities and institutions.

3

Table of contents:

List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 4

List of tables and diagrams……………………………………………………………………………………………………4

1. Summary of the context ..................................................................................................... 5

2. Project background............................................................................................................. 6

3. Geographical coverage ....................................................................................................... 7

4. Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 8

5. Summary of needs assessment .......................................................................................... 9

5.1 Communities ............................................................................................................... 9

5.2 Institutions ................................................................................................................ 10

6. Needs assessment findings............................................................................................... 12

6.1 Community level ....................................................................................................... 12

6.2 Institutional level ....................................................................................................... 17

7. Recommendations and lessons learned ........................................................................... 24

8. Action Plan ........................................................................................................................ 25

9. Annexes ............................................................................................................................ 26

4

List of tables and diagrams:

Table 1. Performance Indicators; Table 2. Communities included to the project action plan; Table 3. Institutions included to the project action plan; Table 4. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs; Table 5. Availability of target communities to meet requirements of potential; Table 6. The selection of target communities; Table 7. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs; Table 8. Selection of target institutions in Popasnyansky rayon; Table 9. Selection of target institutions in Novoaidarsky rayon; Table 10. Selection of target institutions in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon; Table 11. Action Plan; Diagram 1. Water Supply Sources; Diagram 2. (A, B) Type of water supply system in the assessed communities; Diagram 3. Access to water; Diagram 4. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs; Diagram 5. Water supply sources by rayons; Diagram 6. Access to water; Diagram 7. Water quality; Diagram 8. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs.

List of Acronyms:

AN – arche noVa;

FGD – Focus Group Discussion;

GCA – Government Controlled Area;

HH – household;

LoC – Line of Contact UNICEF – United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund;

NGCA – Non-Government Controlled Area;

PIN – People in Need;

Popasnaynsky Vodokanal – Public utility company serving centralized water supply system in Luhansk oblast;

ROS – Reverse Osmosis System;

WASH – Water, Sanitation and Hygiene;

WS – Water Supply.

5

1. Summary of the context After four years of conflict, Eastern Ukraine continues to be the scene of frequent armed clashes, which, since 2014, have caused more than 2,500 civilian deaths and 9,000 injured. As a consequence of protracted nature of conflict, the humanitarian situation remains difficult for last years, and is additionally impacted by socio-economic vulnerability and increased poverty. Vulnerability and poverty is on the increase in Eastern Ukraine, forcing the population to practice negative coping strategies. Water, Sanitary and Hygiene needs stay points of most concerns among the acute needs of conflict-affected population. Reports, including Humanitarian Needs Overview, indicate that approximately 3.2 M people need assistance in terms of WASH in the conflict affected areas, both in Donetska and Luhanska oblasts (GCA and NGCA).

According to the latest research, overall, 34% of HHs consume untreated drinking water. This percentage includes more than half of rural HHs (53% compared to 30% of urban households). These rates remain unchanged from summer 2017, and have increased from 2016 when only 26% of households reported consuming untreated drinking water. Water shortages affect more than a quarter of households (26%), with another 18% of households unconnected to central water supplies. The most frequently reported coping strategy of households is storing water1. Another data analysis initiated by REACH shows that fifty-six percent (56%) of HHs reported being dissatisfied with the quality of their drinking water. HHs located within 5km of the LoC were more likely to report daily water shortages (16%)2. Here it would be relevant to provide people’s feedback about water delivery based on rationing schedule: “As a consequence of water access issues, population of target locations have very limited opportunity to follow sanitary and hygiene requirements in the households. Women mentioned that they had house cleaning and laundry issues as water was delivering while they were at work. Child care and care for older people having limited mobility (bedridden persons) are also becoming significant challenge for families”3.

In order to address WASH-related needs, AN has been implementing the UNICEF-funded project entitled “Improving resilience of communities through support to decentralized water system and providing access to safe water in Novoaidarsky, Popasniansky and Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayons of Lugansk Oblast GCA”. This needs assessment is starting point of the project implementation focused on identifying and verifying needs of people on communities and institutions level. The needs assessment was initiated to develop the detailed project action plan.

1 Situation Overview: Winter Assessment of Government-Controlled Areas within 5km of the Line of Contact, REACH, February 2018. 2 Humanitarian Trend Analysis Fact Sheet, REACH, June 2018. 3 Report on Focus Group Discussions, UNICEF/AN, October 2018.

6

2. Project background

The project entitled “Improving resilience of communities through support to decentralized water system and providing access to safe water in Novoaidarsky, Popasniansky and Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayons of Lugansk Oblast GCA”aims at increasing the resilience of local communities and providing them with access to drinking water. The intervention started on 13 July 2018 and will last one year, covering the budget of 596,133.75 USD. The project focuses on achieving the following main results:

1) Detailed assessment of water supplies for small towns and villages; 2) Resilience of communities in villages and small towns is improved through access to

rehabilitated water supply; 3) Children and families in the project’s locations receive drinking water when their usual

supply fails.

Each project result includes performance indicators reflected in the table below. Table 1. Performance Indicators

Project result

Indicator Target

1

Number of assessed facilities 25

Number of assessed villages 15

Number of FGD conducted (disaggregated by rayon, municipality, at least 65% of participants are women)

25

2

Number of wells/boreholes constructed and operating 6

Number of water-towers constructed and functioning 2

Number of water treatment stations installed (ROS) and operating 10

Number of villages supported with regular access to safe water by renovation of existing network/construction of new one

4

% of women involved in design, construction, maintenance and operation of decentralized water systems in settlements and small towns (disaggregated by age and rayon)

65%

Number of institutions rehabilitated by water supply and/or sewage system replacement (including supporting materials)

10

Number of people provided with access to sufficient quantities of water (disaggregated by sex and age, rural/urban, where possible)

87,718

3

Number of water tests conducted 1000

Number of people provided with access to sufficient quality of water(disaggregated by sex and age, rural/urban, where possible)

18,440

Number of water tanks installed 60

Number of pumps provided 15

7

3. Geographical coverage The project focuses on Popasnyansky, Novoaidarsky and Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayons. The initial project plan included 29 potential locations which had to be assessed in order to identify the most vulnerable communities and locations having acute WASH needs. Particularly, the project planned to assess Orikhove, Katerynivka, Bila Hora (Pidlisne), Vovchoiarivka, Komyshuvakha, Novoivanivka, Mikolaivka, Druzhba, Popasna, Zolote, Vrubivka, Novotoshkivske, Toshkivka, Nyzhnie and Girske in Popasnyansky rayon, Krymske, Shchastie, Raigorodka, Bakhmutivka, Muratove and Denezhnykove in Novoaidarsky rayon, and Petropavlivka, Shyroke, Nyzhnioteple, Valuiske, Plotyna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Gerasimivka and Teple in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon. In August, the project team reviewed the list of potential locations and made adjustments. Specifically, the locations such as Hrechyshkyne and Dubove in Novoaidarsky rayon, Nyzhnia Vilkhova, Pshenychne and Vilkhove in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon were added to the list. At the same time, Druzhba, Mikolaivka, Orikhove in Popasna rayon, Gerasimivka, Teple and Nyzhnioteple in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon were excluded from the assessment process due to various reasons. For instance, Druzhba, Mikolaivka were canceled from the assessment plans as local authorities emphasized other locations with more critical needs. Orikhove was indicated as the location without serious gaps. The project team tried to contact the authorities of Gerasimivka, but they were not available. In total, the assessment process covered 28 locations. The detailed description of assessed communities is provided under section 5 – Summary of Needs Assessment.

8

4. Methodology The needs assessment aimed at identifying acute needs and gaps in relation to water and sanitation issues among target communities and institutions. The data collection process was organized based on a triangulation method using a combination of multiply research methods or data sources. Particularly, the triangulation method included interviewing local authorities, administration of institutions or other key stakeholders, conducting focus-group discussions and observing the potential targets. Furthermore, assessment activities focused on technical assessment of the selected communities and institutions, and on additional negotiations with key stakeholders. The assessment resulted in making final decision on target communities and institutions, and including them in the project action plan after receiving UNICEF’s approval.

Interviews. The data collection used structured interviews based on questionnaire developed by the project team at the initial stage of project. The questionnaire consisted of closed and half-open questions focused on various aspects of WASH issues: water sources, access to water, water shortages, quality of water, type of water supply system, conditions of sewage system, identifying repair and installation needs including water towers, boreholes, pipelines, sewage systems and water tanks and ROS. In addition to this, the questionnaire included technical questions on type of works required to cover the existing needs. The structured interview also aimed at identifying capacity and willingness of key stakeholders to be involved in repairing process and ensuring proper documentation. In fact, the openness to cooperate was considered as one of the main selection criteria. Finally, the interview contained general questions related to local infrastructure and number of potential beneficiaries disaggregated by age and gender.

Focus Group Discussions. FGD ensured the needs assessment with additional data sources to verify information received from the interviews as well as take into consideration communities’ interests. Conducting FGDs was based on the Question Guide developed and piloted in August. The Question Guide consisted of 14 questions mainly focused on water needs including access to water, quality of water, water consumption, emergency water needs, impact of water issues on people health and daily life on community and household levels. The guide was structured to start from general questions to more specific details. Although FGDs were part of the needs assessment, the detailed information about FGDs results and FGD Guide are provided in the separate report.

Observation. The method included visiting potential targets to verify if needs were really acute and could be covered by the project. Additionally, the assessment team was evaluating potential risks on capacity and motivation of key stakeholders in relations to involvement in repair and construction processes. Based on this evaluation, the assessment staff developed recommendations which were also used in the decision making process.

Respondents. The key informants for interviews were local authorities, administration of institutions and representatives of Popasnyansky vodokanal. The FGDs participants were represented by people with various social status including engineers, librarians, teachers, drivers, pensioners, unemployed people, volunteers, social workers, doctors, nurses, women on maternity leave, community leaders and representatives of local authorities. It is worth mentioning, that the assessment also involved rayons’ administrations who were contacted in order to receive additional information.

9

The assessment team. The interviewing, observing and technical assessing were conducted by two Project Engineers and Technical Coordinator. FGDs were organized by two Social Workers under the support of M&E Officers.

5. Summary of needs assessment The needs assessment started on 22nd of August 2018 and was completed on 15th of October 2018. The indicated period included interviewing process, technical assessing and additional negotiating with key stakeholders including also rayons’ administrations.

In total, 28 locations were covered by the assessment process with the focus on 19 communities and 27 institutions. However, final KoBo data base, used fo the analysis, included 17 communities and 26 institutions as few questionnaires were not completed due to low priorities or absence of acute needs according to the reports of key stakeholders.

Communities

Most communities in Novoaidarsky and Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayons have access to water through boreholes and wells. At the same time, significant part of assessed locations in Popasnyansky rayon are ensured with central water supply system.

Five target communities have centralized water supply system and are served by Popasnyansky Vodokanal: Nyzhnie, Toshkivka, Vovchoiarivka rural settlements and Popasna city in Popasnyansky rayon, and Nyzhnia Vilkhova rural settlement in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon.

7 communities among 17 assessed are receiving water based on rationing schedule: Vrubivka, Dubove, Zolote, Novotoshkivske, Toshkivka, Komyshuvakha and Popasna. One more community from Hrechyshkyne location is in the most critical situation with access to water. In addition to this, some communities do not have access to water 3-4 days monthly due to pipes burst. As a consequence of water access issues, population of target locations has very limited opportunity to follow sanitary and hygiene requirements in their respective households. Women, children, older people and people with disabilities are the most vulnerable population groups suffering from water issues.

The needs assessment showed that the most required assistance was pipelines rehabilitation (48%) among the assessed communities. AN also determined high demands in the following types of assistance: boreholes rehabilitation (19%), boreholes construction (14%) and water tower rehabilitation/construction (14%).

Final selection of target communities was done according to the criteria-based evaluation. Specifically, three criteria, evaluated on the base of three-points scale, included the following information: readiness of key stakeholders to ensure proper documentation for repaired objects, availability or absence of other funds to cover needs, and availability of design documents. The communities with highest total score (9 and 8 points) were also evaluated by additional criterion focusing on level of complexity for required assistance.

10

All above mentioned resulted in making a decision about target communities reflected in the table below. Table 2. Communities included to the project action plan

Rayon

Community Type of assistance Decision

Popasniansky

Nyzhnie pipelines rehabilitation Targeted

Vovchoiarivka pipelines construction Targeted

Toshkivka pipelines rehabilitation Targeted

Komyshuvakha boreholes rehabilitation Targeted

Popasna boreholes rehabilitation Targeted

Novoaidarsky Dubove boreholes rehabilitation Targeted

Stanychno-Luhanskyi

Nyzhnia Vilkhova pipelines rehabilitation Targeted

Pshenychne w_tower rehab_constr Targeted

Shyrokiy boreholes construction Targeted

Institutions

Most institutions located in Stanychno-Luhanskyi and Popasnyansky rayons receive water through central water supply sources. In Novoaidarsky rayon, majority of assessed institutions (70%) have access to water through individual boreholes;

While Katerynivka FAP has very limited access to water, 4 institutions including Plotyna educational institution, Shyroke kindergarten, Popasna hospital and Zolote (Stakhanovec) FAP are receiving water based on the rationing schedule.

In total, 8 institutions indicated poor water quality; Novoivanivka school, Bakhmutivka school, Denezhnykove school, Shyroke kindergarten “Kazka”, Popasna hospital, Toshkivka FAP, Shchastie kindergarten and Shchastie school #2.

Most required types of assistance identified during the assessment were water supply rehabilitation (28%), toilets construction (22%) and sewage system replacement (15%).

The project staff, based on collected data, personal observation, additional clarification of missing information from key stakeholder and technical assessment, made a conclusion focusing on two criteria: 1) level of complexity of proposed assistance; 2) level of acuteness of proposed assistance. These two criteria were used to make a decision about including the potential institutions in the project action plan. The results of criteria-based evaluation are reflected in the table below. Table 3. Institutions included to the project action plan

Rayon Institution Type of assistance Decision

Popasnyansky

Toshkivka educational complex Sewage replacement Targeted

Popasna hospital Toilets construction Targeted

Zolote (Stakhanovec) FAP Pumps installation Targeted

Toshkivka FAP Water tanks installation Targeted

Novoaidarsky Bakhmutivka school

Sewage replacement Targeted

Septic tank Targeted

Denezhnykove school Pumps installation Targeted

11

Borhole failed to function, Komyshuvakha, Popasnyansky rayon, joint visit with UNICEF

Water tanks installation Targeted

Sewage replacement ( septic tank) Targeted

Toilets construction Targeted

Water filter system installation Targeted

Muratove educational complex Toilets construction Targeted

Krymske educational complex Toilets construction Targeted

Muratove FAP Toilets construction Targeted

Shchastie kindergarten Water tanks installation Waiting list

Krymske FAP Sewage replacement Targeted Toilets construction Targeted

Shchastie school # 2 Water filter system installation Targeted

Shchastie hospital Toilets construction Targeted

Stanychno-Luhanskyi

Vilkhove school

Sewage replacement Targeted


Toilets construction Targeted

Plotyna educational complex Water tanks installation Targeted

Valuiske school # 2 Sewage replacement Waiting list (

budget limitation) Toilets construction

Shyroke kindergarten “Kazka” Water tanks installation Targeted

Water filter system installation Targeted

Petropavlivka school # 1

Sewage replacement Waiting list

Toilets construction Waiting list


12

6. Needs assessment findings

Community level

In general, water supply sources are relatively similar in all rayons. However, rayons differ from each other with prevailing number of one or two types of water sources. Diagram below shows which water sources are mostly used by communities depending on locations and rayons. Diagram 1. Water Supply Sources

According to the Diagram 1, the majority of communities in Novoaidarsky and Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayons have access to water through boreholes and wells. In some locations, people mostly use individual wells and boreholes. At the same time, significant part of assessed locations in Popasniansky rayon are ensured with central water supply systems. It is worth mentioning, that Pshenychne village in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon is characterized with only individual boreholes, Krymske location in Novoaidarsky rayon have mostly individual wells. Next two diagrams reflect communities having centralized and decentralized water supply systems. Particularly, Diagram 2 (A) demonstrates percentage of all assessed locations having first or second type of water supply system. The Diagram 2 (B) helps to understand allocation of water supply system by communities supposed to be included in the project action plan. Diagram 2 (A, B). Type of water supply system in the assessed communities

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Novoaidarsky Popasniansky Stanytsia-Luhanska

boreholes & indiv idual wells

CWS & individual wells

individual wells

individual boreholes

central water supply (CWS)

boreholes

53%(9 locations)

47%(8 locations)

Water system

centralized system

decentralizedsystem

50%, Centralized

system

50%, Decentralize

d system

Water system (selected locations)

centralizedsystem

decentralizedsystem

NyzhnieNyzhnia VilkhovaVovchoiarivkaToshkivkaPopasna

13

According to the Diagram 2 (B), five communities among the selected to make an intervention have centralized water supply system and are served by Popasnyansky Vodokanal. These locations include Nyzhnie, Toshkivka, Vovchoiarivka rural settlements and Popasna city in Popasnyansky rayon, and Nyzhnia Vilkhova rural settlement in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon. Dividing selected locations by type of water supply system was important as locations having centralized water supply system required additional approval from UNICEF. The last was related to that the project initially had to assist communities having decentralized water supply system4.

One of the important questions identifying level of vulnerability was focused on issues with access to water. Particularly, all respondents were asked if target community had limited access to water due to water shortage or rationing schedule of water delivery. Diagram 3 shows number of communities suffering due to limited access to water. Diagram 3. Access to water

Specifically, Hrechyshkyne location is in the most critical situation with access to water. Other 7 locations including Vrubivka, Dubove, Zolote, Novotoshkivske, Toshkivka, Komyshuvakha and Popasna are receiving water based on rationing schedule. For instance, people in Popasna tend to receive water in the morning from 6 to 10 am and in the evening from 6 to 10 pm. Vrubivka community has access to water only in the evening time. Population of Toshkivka is not able to receive water from 10 pm to 7 am. Additionally, disruption of water delivery frequently happens due to pipes burst. For instance, people in Zolote and Nyzhnie do not have access to water 3-4 time each month due to the mentioned problem. As a consequence of water access issues, population of target locations has very limited opportunity to follow sanitary and hygiene requirements in their respective households. Women mentioned that they had house cleaning and laundry issues as water was delivered while they were at work. Child care or care for older people having limited mobility (bedridden persons) are also

4 Taking into consideration the high level of vulnerability of assessed communities, AN agreed with UNICEF to make an intervention in the locations having acute needs despite of centralized water supply system.

41%

53%

6%

Water supply shcedule

according to the schedule

on a 24-hour basis

not working

Hrechyshkyne

14

becoming significant challenge for families. Finally, people also have difficulties with personal hygiene5. During the assessment process, the technical team identified types of assistance which could cover the determined needs. The below Diagram summarizes findings from all of the assessed communities, including those selected for further intervention. Diagram 4. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs

Table below gives a breakdown of data indicated in the Diagram 4. Table 4. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs

Type of assistance Type of

assistance in relation to all locations, %

Locations Type of assistance in relation to selected locations, %

Locations

5 The information has been taken from the report on focus group discussions conducted in the frame of this needs assessment.

4 locations33%

2 locations17%

3 locations25%

2 locations17%

1 location 8%

boreholes_rehabilitation

4 locations19%

boreholes_сonstruction

3 locations14%

pipelines_rehabilitation

10 locations48%

w_tower_rehab_constr

3 locations14%

pipelines_сonstruction

1 location5%

What assistance is needed?inside the circle - selected locations, outside the circle -

all locations

15

Boreholes rehabilitation 19 Komyshuvakha, Popasna, Toshkivka, Dybove

33 Komyshuvakha, Popasna, Toshkivka, Dybove

Boreholes construction 14 Vrubivka, Shyroke, Krymske 17 Vrubivka, Shyroke

Pipelines rehabilitation 48 Novoivanivka, Nyzhnie, Dybove, Nyzhnia Vilkhova, Hrechyshkyne, Zolote, Novotoshkivske, Shchastia, Toshkivka, Pidlisne

25 Nyzhnie, Nyzhnia Vilkhova, Toshkivka

Water tower rehabilitation/construction

14 Pshenychne, Vrubivka, Hrechyshkyne

17 Pshenychne, Vrubivka

Pipelines construction 5 Vovchoiarivka 8 Vovchoiarivka

According to the diagram and table, biggest percentage of required assistance was pipelines rehabilitation, 48%. It is worth mentioning, that the last two columns of table reflect data used for developing the project action plan. For instance, among 10 communities having needs of pipelines rehabilitation 3 communities were included in the action plan. The selection process was based on the project budget limitation and several additional criteria. Particularly, these criteria took into consideration readiness of key stakeholders to ensure proper documentation for repaired objects, availability or absence of other funds to cover needs and availability of design documents. The criteria were evaluated based on three-points scale where: 1 – meant a lack of required documents, absence of readiness to take responsibility for ensuring proper documentation or availability of other funds; 2 – referred to that all requirements would be ensured, but there could be some risks; and 3 – meant that key stakeholders / repaired objects will meet all requirements. The results of evaluation by three criteria can be observed below in the Table 3.

According to the Table 3, the assessed communities received different score varied from 1 to 9. The highest total score (9 points) allowed to add the assessed communities to the list of target communities. In addition to this, the decision was made to include communities having 8 points of score in the list of target. However, the assessment process also included one more criterion impacted on final selection of target communities. Specifically, the project engineers based on their observation and interview questions were indicating the level of complexity for required assistance. The criterion included potential technical difficulties during the construction/reconstruction/repair processes as well as other risk factors related to low motivation of key stakeholders, legal issues, high level of insecurity, political risks etc. Next table shows how communities with 8 and 9 points of score were evaluated based on additional criterion. Table 5. Availability of target communities to meet requirements of potential assistance

Rayon Location Type of work Readiness for ensuring proper documentation

Availability of other budget sources

Availability of planning/design documents

Total score

Popasniansky Vrubivka

boreholes construction

3 3 3 9

w_tower rehab_constr

3 3 1 7

16

Novoivanivka pipelines rehabilitation

3 2 2 7

Nyzhnie pipelines rehabilitation

3 3 3 9

Zolote pipelines rehabilitation

3 3 3 9

Vovchoiarivka pipelines construction

3 3 3 9

Toshkivka

boreholes rehabilitation

1 1

pipelines rehabilitation

3 3 3 9

Komyshuvakha boreholes rehabilitation

3 3 2 9

Popasna boreholes rehabilitation

3 3 3 9

Pidlisne pipelines rehabilitation

3 3 1 7

Novoaidarsky

Dubove

boreholes rehabilitation

3 3 2 8


3 3 1 7

Hrechyshkyne


3 3 3 9

w_tower rehab_constr

3 3 3 9

Shchastie pipelines rehabilitation

1 3 3 7

Krymske boreholes construction

3 3 1 7

Stanychno-Luhanskyi

Nyzhnia Vilkhova


3 3 3 9

Pshenychne w_tower rehab_constr

3 3 3 9

Shyrokiy boreholes construction

3 3 2 8

Table 6. The selection of target communities

Rayon Location Type of work Total score

Level of complexity for required assistance (if applicable)

Decision on targeting

Popasniansky

Vrubivka boreholes construction 9

According to Popasnyansky Vodokanal report, the borehole should be firstly explored by them. Additionally, the borehole’s area is located near railways and local authorities are not eligible to use the area due to property issues.

Excluded

Nyzhnie pipelines rehabilitation 9 Middle Included

Zolote pipelines rehabilitation 9 High Excluded

Vovchoiarivka pipelines construction 9 Included

Toshkivka pipelines rehabilitation 9 Low Included

Komyshuvakha boreholes rehabilitation 8 Included

Popasna boreholes rehabilitation 9 Included

Novoaidarsky Dubove boreholes rehabilitation 8 Included

Hrechyshkyne pipelines rehabilitation 9 High Excluded

17

w_tower rehab_constr 9 High Excluded

Stanychno-Luhanskyi

Nyzhnia Vilkhova pipelines rehabilitation 9 Low Included

Pshenychne w_tower rehab_constr 9 Included

Shyrokiy boreholes construction 8 Included

Water-tower, Petropavlivka, Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon

Institutional level

In total, the KoBo database included information about 26 institutions located in three target rayons: 5 educational institutions and 3 kindergartens in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon; 5 educational institutions, one kindergarten, 3 FAPs and one hospital in Novoaidarsky rayon; 3 educational institutions, 4 FAPs and one hospital in Popasnyansky rayon. The assessment showed that the institutions have access to water through different water supply sources. Diagram below demonstrates which water supply sources are available for assessed institutions. Diagram 5. Water supply sources by rayons

10

8 8

7

1

3

5

7

2

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Novoaidarsky Popasniansky Stanytsia-Luhanska

Water supply sources

Institutions

Individual boreholes

Central water supply

Wells

Public boreholes

18

According to the Diagram 5, majority of institutions connected to central water supply sources are located in Stanychno-Luhanskyi and Popasnyansky rayons. It is worth mentioning that having central water supply sources do not refer to centralized water supply system. It is interesting that most institutions in Novoaidarsky rayon have access to water through individual boreholes (70% of assessed institutions). Two institutions in Popasnyansky rayon, Bila Hora FAP and Novoivanivka school are using wells. Diagram 6. Access to water

21 institutions (81%) have no issues with access to water which is much better compared to assessed communities. 4 institutions including Plotyna educational institution, Shyroke kindergarten, Popasna hospital and Zolote (Stakhanovec) FAP are receiving water based on the rationing schedule. There is also one institution, Katerynivka FAP, without access to water. At the same time, according to FGDs, some institutions included in 81% have problems with access to water due to issues with boreholes’ equipment. Particularly, FGDs’ participants mentioned that one of main issues was that construction elements of boreholes failed to function. For instance, a pump in Denezhnykove school is out of service every month, and repairs are paid by school administration and parents. Parents have to pay for repairing borehole in Muratove educational institution every six months. Muratove ambulatory does not have enough water due to the limited capacity of water tower and property-related issues. Administration and parents are purchasing drinking bottled water which impacts on budget of conflict-affected families6. The needs assessment additionally allowed to identify issues related to the quality of water. Next diagram reflects percentage of institutions complaining about the quality of water.


81%

15%

4%

Water supply shcedule

on a 24-hour basis according to the schedule no water (water is brought from neighboring houses)

Zolote (Katerynivka) FAP

* Plotyna edu_complex* Shyroke kindergarten "Kazka"* Popasna hospital* Zolote (Stakhanovec) FAP

19

Diagram 7. Water quality

In total, 8 institutions pointed to poor water quality; Novoivanivka school, Bakhmutivka school, Denezhnykove school, Shyroke kindergarten “Kazka”, Popasna hospital, Toshkivka FAP, Shchastie kindergarten and Shchastie school # 2. Some additional information about the quality of water was received from focus group discussions. For instance, FGD participants in Shyroke stated that water does not meet clean drinking water’s standards. FGD participants in Vilkhove school mentioned that water can include rust due to poor conditions of water supply system. Speaking about Stanytsia, the kindergartens have access only to technical water and the institutions’ staff have to boil it. The participants of FGD in Denezhnykove stated that water includes rust and sediments and according to the laboratory tests, water cannot be used for drinking and preparing food. In Bakhmutivka school participants complained about the color of water7.

The most important data identified type of assistance which could cover the determined needs. Based on this data, the technical staff made field visits to organize technical assessment of target object after finishing the needs assessment process. Next diagram reflects percentage of each type of assistance in relation to all required aid.


69%(18 institutions) 31%

(8 institutions)

Water quality

don`t have problems with water quality poor water quality

20

Diagram 8. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs

Table below gives a breakdown of data indicated in the Diagram 7. Table 7. Types of assistance required to cover the most critical needs

Type of assistance All institutions Preliminary selected

institutions Pumps installation Zolote (Stakhanovec), Denezhnykove school Zolote (Stakhanovec)

Water tanks installation Muratove educational_complex, Vilkhove school, Plotyna educational_complex, Shyroke kindergarten "Kazka", Petropavlivka school # 1, Popasna hospital , Denezhnykove school, Toshkivka FAP, Shchastia kindergarten

Muratove educational_complex, Vilkhove school, Plotyna educational_complex, Shyroke kindergarten "Kazka", Petropavlivka school # 1

Sewage replacement Toshkivka educational_complex, Bakhmutivka school, Denezhnykove school, Krymske FAP, Toshkivka school # 23, Raihorodka FAP, Vilkhove school, Plotyna educational_complex, Stanytsia_luhanska school # 1, Stanytsia_luhanska kindergarten "Teremok",

Toshkivka educational_complex, Bakhmutivka school, Denezhnykove school, Krymske FAP

1 locations4%

5 locations21%

4 locations17%

2 locations8%

3 location 13%

1 locations4%

8 locations33%

pumps_installation

2 locations3% water_tanks_instal

lation 9 locations

14%

sewage_replacement

13 locations21%

water_filter_system_installation 10 locations

16%

ws_replacement 9 location

14%

septic_tank1 locations

2%

toilets_construction

19 locations30%

What assistance is needed?inside the circle - selected institutions, outside the circle -

all institutions

21

Stanytsia_luhanska kindergarten "Topolek", Valuiske school # 2, Petropavlivka school # 1

Toilets construction Popasna hospital, Denezhnykove school, Muratove educational_complex, Krymske educational_complex, Muratove FAP, Krymske FAP, Shchastia hospital, Vilkhove school, Novoivanivka school, Bila_hora FAP, Toshkivka FAP, Raihorodka FAP, Shchastia kindergarten, Shchastia school # 2, Plotyna educational_complex, Stanytsia_luhanska kindergarten "Teremok", Stanytsia_luhanska kindergarten "Topolek", Valuiske school # 2, Petropavlivka school # 1

Popasna hospital, Denezhnykove school, Muratove educational_complex, Krymske educational_complex, Muratove FAP, Krymske FAP, Shchastia hospital, Vilkhove school

Water filter system installation Plotyna educational_complex, Shyrokiy kindergarten "Kazka", Novoivanivka school, Popasna hospital, Toshkivka FAP, Bakhmutivka school, Denezhnykove school, Muratove educational_complex, Shchastia kindergarten, Shchastia school # 2

Plotyna educational_complex, Shyrokiy kindergarten "Kazka"

Water supply replacement Muratove FAP, Krymske FAP, Shchastia hospital, Bila_hora FAP, Toshkivka FAP, Raihorodka FAP, Vilkhove school, Plotyna educational_complex, Stanytsia_luhanska kindergarten "Teremok"

Muratove FAP, Krymske FAP, Shchastia hospital

Septic tank Bakhmutivka school Bakhmutivka school

At the end of assessment process, the team had to make a decision about the selection of target institutions, and in addition to this, which types of assistance could be provided taking into consideration the budget limitation, the project timeframe, availability of required equipment in target location and level of acuteness for each intervention. The project staff based on collected data, personal observation, additional clarification of missing information from key stakeholder and technical assessment through field visits made a conclusion focusing on two criteria: 1) level of complexity for proposed assistance; 2) level of acuteness for proposed assistance. Next tables show how each required assistance met the mentioned criteria.

Table 8. Selection of target institutions in Popasnyansky rayon

Institution Type of assistance Level of complexity

Level of acuteness

Decision

Novoivanivka school Water filter system installation Low Low Excluded

Toilets construction Middle Low Excluded

Toshkivka educational complex

Sewage replacement Low Middle Targeted

Toshkivka school # 23 Sewage replacement Middle Low Excluded

Zolote (Katerynivka) FAP

WS replacement High High Excluded (High level of insecurity)

Bila hora FAP Toilets construction Low Low Excluded

Popasna hospital Water tanks installation Low Low Excluded (Later the needs were targeted)

Toilets construction Middle Middle Targeted

Water filter system installation Low Low Excluded

Zolote (Stakhanovec) FAP

Pumps installation Low Middle Targeted

Toshkivka FAP Water tanks installation Middle Middle Targeted

Toilets construction Low Low Excluded

Water filter system installation Low Low Excluded

22

Table 9. Selection of target institutions in Novoaidarsky rayon

Table 10. Selection of target institutions in Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon


Level of acuteness

Decision

Bakhmutivka school Water filter system installation High Middle Excluded

Sewage replacement High High Targeted

Septic tank High High Targeted

Raihorodka FAP Sewage replacement Middle High Excluded (Will be funded through other sources)

Toilets construction Middle High

Denezhnykove school

Pumps installation Low Middle Targeted

Water tanks installation Low Middle Targeted

Sewage replacement ( septic tank)

High High Targeted

Toilets construction High High Targeted

Water filter system installation Middle Middle Targeted

Muratove educational complex


Water tanks installation Low Low Excluded

Water filter system installation Low Low Excluded (The institution has ROS that does not work due to lack of capacity of staff)

Krymske educational complex


Muratove FAP Toilets construction Middle High Targeted

Shchastie kindergarten Water tanks installation Low Middle Waiting list

Toilets construction Not relevant Low Excluded

Water filter system installation Not relevant Low Excluded

Krymske FAP Sewage replacement Middle Middle Targeted

Toilets construction Middle Middle Targeted

Shchastie school # 2 Toilets construction Middle Low Excluded

Water filter system installation Middle Middle Targeted

Shchastie hospital Toilets construction Middle High Targeted


Level of acuteness

Decision

Vilkhove school Sewage replacement Middle High Targeted


Toilets construction Middle High Targeted

Plotyna educational complex

Sewage replacement Middle Low Excluded


Water filter system installation Middle Low Excluded ( targeted after additional assessment)


Stanytsia Luhanska school #1

Sewage replacement Middle Low Excluded

Stanytsia Luhanska kindergarten “Teremok”

Sewage replacement Middle Middle Excluded


Stanytsia Luhanska kindergarten “Topolek”

Sewage replacement Low Low Excluded

Toilets construction Low Low Excluded

Valuiske school # 2 Sewage replacement High High Waiting list ( budget limitation) Toilets construction High High

Shyroke kindergarten “Kazka”

Water tanks installation High High Targeted

Water filter system installation Middle High Targeted

23

The project action plan including the results of selection tables is indicated under section 8 of the report. It is worth mentioning that repair/or construction works in the targets having high level of complexity will be monitored more carefully by the project engineers.

Toilet room, Muratove ambulatory, Novoaidarsky rayon

Toilet room, Vilkhove school, Stanychno-Luhanskyi rayon

Petropavlivka school # 1 Sewage replacement High High Waiting list

Toilets construction High High Waiting list

Water tanks installation Middle Middle Targeted

24

7. Recommendations and lessons learned The assessment process revealed that the current assessment questionnaire contains some duplicating questions which create some confusion during the process of data analysis and which unnecessarily prolong the assessment process. In order to make future assessments more efficient, the survey questionnaire should be reviewed: 1) to exclude duplicate questions which can lead to confusing during the process of data analysis; 2) to ensure better structure and relevance of questions to exploring needs.

The organized assessment shows that a more organized and transparent system of evaluation of vulnerability level should be developed and included in the survey questionnaire or assessment process. In this regard, the developed system should be based on several criteria focusing on acuteness of required assistance, social vulnerability, capacity of local community / local authorities / institution and technical conditions of target objects. In other words, during the process of data analysis, it became clear that some factors, which could help to make a decision, were not taken into concidetaion. To cover the mentioned gaps, the project team together with the Engineers had several meetings to discuss each assessed target. The data analysis also gave a chance to understand that withought clear evaluation criteria the personal preference of the assessment team can influence the decision making process. Taking the mentioned into the consideration, the team tried to develop the evaluation criteria during the process of data analysis.

Key informants/stakeholders should be identified more carefully before starting the process of interview. For instance, some respondents had lack of information about the assessed targets, hence, the assessment team had to organize additional interviews with another respondents.

Focus group discussions should ensure better support for the needs assessment process, thus, FGD Question Guide as well as invited participants require more attention. Using FGDs was first experience of AN in the needs assessment. During the process of assessment, the team understood that FGDs could identify the missed information and serve as additional source of information. In its turn, this means that the team had to make strong relations between the assessment questionnaire and FGD Question Guide. Additionally, both assessment tools (interviews with key stakeholders and FGDs with local communities/representatives of institutions) should be used simultaneously or one after another without long break. Finally, it is recommended to ask local stakeholders to help with organizing FGDs’ participants based on selection criteria.

25

8. Action Plan Table 11. Action Plan

Project result

Project Indicator The needs assessment targets

Target communities/institutions

Comments

2

6 wells/boreholes constructed and operating

3 Komyshuvakha, Popasna and Shyroke

Two communities, Krymske and Vrubivka, were excluded during the preparing this report. Two communities, Dubove and Toshkivka, have needs of boreholes equipment ( pumps)

2 water-towers constructed and functioning

1 Pshenychne During the preparing the report, Petropavlivka community was included in the project action plan. The full assessment was completed in November as initial recommendation of rayon administration was not to focus on this community.

10 water treatment stations installed (ROS) and operating

3 Denezhnykove school, Shyroke kindergarten “Kazka” and Shchastie school # 2.

4 villages supported with regular access to safe water by renovation of existing network/construction of new one

4 Nyzhnie, Toshkivka, Nyzhnia Vilkhova and Vovchoiarivka

10 institutions rehabilitated by water supply and/or sewage system replacement (including supporting materials)

10 Vilkhove school, Shchastie hospital, Krymske FAP, Muratove FAP, Krymske educational complex, Muratove educational complex, Denezhnykove school, Bakhmutivka school, Popasna hospital and Toshkivka educational complex

Two institutions have been included in the waiting list: Valuiske school # 2, Petropavlivka school #1. The assistance will be provided in case the project will have budget savings.

3

60 water tanks installed

78 Petropavlivka school # 1, Shyroke kindergarten “Kazka”, Plotyna educational complex, Vilkhove school, Shchastie kindergarten, Denezhnykove school and Toshkivka FAP

15 pumps provided 2 Zolote (Stakhanovec) FAP, Denezhnykove school

According to the Table 9, the needs assessment made significant contribution in identifying needs which could be covered in the frame of Project Result 2. However, the targets such as constructing boreholes for communities and installation of ROS for institutions still require additional exploring needs of three rayons. It is also worth mentioning, that the assessment team did not identify significant gap in needs of water tanks and pumps in the assessed institutions. The main reason is that such needs had been covered by other humanitarian

8 The figure reflects number of institutions having needs of water tanks installation and does not give a number of water tanks. During the assessment process, the project team was not able to identify number of water tanks

26

organizations like, for instance, PIN. As a result, AN made a decision to initiate an additional needs assessment with focusing on installation of ROS, installation of water tanks, installation of pump stations and boreholes construction. During the preparing this report, the project team was on the process of conducting the additional needs assessment.

9. Annexes

Survey questionnaire Community level

Вопрос Варианты ответа

Согласие респондента на то, что его ответы могут использоваться для анализа и подготовки финального отчета, который в свою очередь может стать публичным. да/нет

1. Общая информация

1.1 Район

1.2 Название населенного пункта

1.3 Географические координаты населенного пункта или учреждения

1.4 Имя ключевого респондента

1.5 Пол респондента

1.6 Возраст

1.7 Должность ключевого респондента

1.8 Контактный телефон учреждения

1.9 Контактная электронная почта учреждения

1.10 Количество жителей

1.11.1 Количество детей 0-5: мальчики

1.11.2 Количество детей 0-5: девочки



1.13.1 Количество людей 18-59: мужчины

1.13.2 Количество людей 18-59: женщины

1.14.1 Количество людей 60+: мужчины

1.14.2 Количество людей 60+: женщины

1.15 Количество людей с особенными потребностями

1.16 Количество ВПЛ

1.17 Количество домохозяйств

1.18 Количество частных домов

1.19 Количество многоквартирных домов и их этажность

1.20 Наличие социальных учреждений детский сад/школа/больница/амбулатория/клуб/другое

27

1.21 Количество предприятий (в т.ч. фермерские хозяйства)

1.22 Наличие районных или сельских котельных

1.23 Если есть то, количество домохозяйств, учреждений обслуживаемое котельной

1.24 Наличие учреждений общественного питания (кафе, столовые)

1.25 Комментарий

2. Система водоснабжения

2.1 У кого на балансе система водоснабжения? Если части системы находятся на балансе у разных организаций (например, башня у совета, а сети у Воды Донбасса или другого КП)

2.2 Кто обслуживает систему водоснабжения?

2.3 Источники водоснабжения? (тип, его использование в % если их несколько)

нет/если да, описание

2.4 (ИНЖЕНЕР) Система водоснабжения в городе/поселке

централизованная (обслуживает сети Попаснянский водоканал, Старобельск Вода), децентрализованная (обслуживает местная, поселковая организация), замкнутая или оборотная


3. Источник воды

3.1 Режим подачи воды 24/7 / по графику

3.2 Количество домохозяйств, где отсутствует водоснабжение

3.3 Были ли перебои с водоснабжением за последние 3 месяца?

да/нет

3.3.1 Если да, уточните, пожалуйста, причины/общую информацию

3.3.2 Если да, как вы справляетесь с отсутствием воды

3.4 Какое качество воды? питьевая/техническая

3.4.1 Качество воды: источник информации о качестве воды

3.4.2 Качество воды: как проводится мониторинг качества воды


4. Ремонт/реконструкция/ строительство систем водоснабжения, водоотведения

4.1 Сколько мужчин до 60 лет работает в органе, который принимает решения о системах водозабора, водоснабжения и водоотведения

4.2 Сколько мужчин 60+ лет работает в органе, который принимает решения о системах водозабора, водоснабжения и водоотведения

28

4.3 Сколько женщин до 60 работает в органе, который принимает решения о системах водозабора, водоснабжения и водоотведения

4.4 Сколько женщин 60+ работает в органе, который принимает решения о системах водозабора, водоснабжения и водоотведения


4.6 Какие работы по строительству/ремонту/реконструкции системы водоснабжения или водоотведения нужны в первую очередь?

ремонт водопровода/строительство водопровода/строительство скважин/ремонт скважин/строительство водонапорных башен/ремонт водонапорных башен/ремонт колодцев

4.7 Готовы ли вы взять на себя ответственность за оформление необходимых документов (акт на землю, получение технических условий, работа с ГАСК)? (да/нет). Если да, какую именно документацию?

да/нет/не готовы сразу ответить

4.7.1 Если нет, то «так как Законодательство Украины и донор требует определенного порядка оформления объектов строительства, к сожалению, сотрудничать с вами мы не сможем».

Если да

4.8 Предусмотрены ли какие-либо из этих работ для финансирования из местного или других бюджетов?

да/нет/нет ответа

4.1.1 Если да, какие именно работы? ремонт водопровода/строительство водопровода/строительство скважин/ремонт скважин/строительство водонапорных башен/ремонт водонапорных башен/ремонт колодцев

4.8.2 Если да, в каком объеме?

4.8.3 Какие сроки выполнения?

4.9 Каким образом община может принять участие в проекте?

4.10 Как изменится стоимость услуг водоснабжения/водоотведения для населения/местных бюджетов после реализации проекта?

станут дешевле/стоимость не изменится/станут дороже

4.10.1 Если подорожают (например, повысится стоимость электроэнергии), поддержит ли община проект?

да/нет

4.10.2 Комментарий

4.11 Комментарий "Ремонт/реконструкция/ строительство систем водоснабжения, водоотведения"

5. Ремонт водопровода

5.1 Общая длина водопровода (м)

29

5.1 Наличие плана/схемы/проекта водопроводной сети. Комментарий (какие именно, если есть)

нет/если да, описание

5.2 Когда были установлены трубы?

5.3 Из какого материала изготовлена труба?

5.4 Объекты, которые получают воду из водопровода (частные дворы, соц.учреждения и др.)

5.5 Длина участка трубы, который нужно заменить (м)

5.6 Имеется ли у вас спецификация необходимых для ремонта материалов?

да/нет

5.6 (ИНЖЕНЕР) Оцените сложность проведения работ (требуются проколы под дорогой, трасса проходит по частной территории или предприятию и т.д.)

5.7 Какие причины привели к износу водопровода? (разрушение из-за военных действий, старость, что-то другое)

5.8 Кто будет нести ответственность за ремонт водопровода?

5.9 Кто будет осуществлять ремонт водопровода при предоставлении материалов arche noVa?

5.10 Кто будет оплачивать работы?

5.11 Какие сроки необходимы для осуществления ремонта?

5.12 Сколько человек в результате получат пользу от ремонта водопровода?

5.13 Комментарий "Ремонт водопровода"

6. Строительство водопровода

6.1 Разработана ли проектная документация на строительство водопровода?

да/нет/в процессе разработки

6.1.1 Если есть проект: на какой стадии, укажите категорию сложности или класс последствий

6.2 Получено ли разрешение на начало строительных работ водопровода?

да/нет/в процессе получения

6.3 Имеется ли у вас спецификация необходимых для строительства материалов?

да/нет

6.4 Кто будет осуществлять строительные работы водопровода?

6.5 Кто будет оплачивать строительные работы?

6.6 Кто будет обслуживать трубопровод, у которого он будет на балансе?

6.7 Какие сроки необходимы для строительства?

30

6.8 Сколько человек в результате получат пользу от строительства водопровода?

6.9 Комментарий "Строительство водопровода"

7. Строительство скважины

7.1 Какой глубины в вашем населенном пункте/близлежащих районах подземные источники воды (скважины, колодцы, в т.ч. частные, др.? (м)

7.2 Была ли проведена геологическая разведка?

да/нет/нет ответа

7.2.1 Комментарий: если да (данные геологической разведки)

7.3 Кто будет обслуживать скважину?

7.3.1 Комментарий

7.4 В чьей собственности находятся земли, на которых планируется пробурить скважину? (сельсовет, облсовет, частная собственность)

7.5 Разработана ли проектная документация на строительство скважины?

да/нет

7.6 Если разработана, то какой приблизительный бюджет строительства скважины? (грн.)

7.7 Получено ли разрешение на строительство скважины?

да/нет

7.8 Какие сроки необходимы на строительство скважины?

7.89 Сколько человек в результате получат пользу от строительства скважины?

7.10 Комментарий "Строительство скважины"

8. Ремонт скважины

8.1 В чем суть проблемы, почему нужно ремонтировать скважину?

8.2 Есть ли паспорт скважины? да/нет

8.2.1 Если нет, какая глубина скважины? (м)

8.2.2 Если да, к каким отложениям приурочен водоносный горизонт?

8.2.3 Если нет, какой диаметр обсадной трубы (мм)

8.2.4 Если нет, какой статический уровень воды в скважине (м)

8.2.5 Если нет, какой динамический уровень воды в скважине (м)

8.3 У кого на балансе числится скважина?

8.4 Сколько человек в результате получат пользу от ремонта скважины?

8.5 Комментарий "Ремонт скважины"

31

9. Ремонт/Строительство водонапорной башни

9.1 В чем суть проблемы, почему нужно строить/ремонтировать водонапорную башню?

9.2 Какое количество домов и других объектов будут получать воду из башни?

9.3 Сколько людей будут получать воду от водонапорной башни?

9.4 Тип существующей башни (если ремонт / замена)?

9.5 Кто будет обслуживать башню в дальнейшем?

9.6 Есть ли проектная документация/разрешение на реализацию проекта?

да/нет

9.7 Готовы ли вы произвести ремонт / замену своими силами, если мы предоставим башню и сопутствующие материалы (растяжки и др.).

да/нет

9.7.1 Если да, то - Сроки выполнения работ

9.8 Комментарий "Ремонт/Строительство водонапорной башни"

10.Готовы ли вы организовать работы с обеспечением безопасности людей и окружающей среды (рекультивация грунта (окружающая среда), техника безопасности проведения работ и тд.) да/нет

10.1 Если нет, комментарий

Institutional level

Вопрос Варианты ответа

1. Общая информация

1.1 Район

1.2 Название населенного пункта

1.3 Название учреждения

1.4 Тип учреждения

1.5 Географические координаты объекта

1.6 Имя ключевого респондента

1.7 Пол респондента

1.8 Возраст

1.9 Должность ключевого респондента

1.10 Контактный телефон учреждения

32

1.11 Контактная электронная почта учреждения

1.12 Количество пользователей





1.15.1 Количество людей 18-60: мужчины

1.15.2 Количество людей 18-60: женщины

1.16.1 Количество людей 60+: мужчины

1.16.2 Количество людей 60+: женщины

1.17 Количество людей с особенными потребностями

1.18 Количество ВПЛ


2. Какие работы нужны в первую очередь?

2.1 Источник воды в учреждении Собственная скважина / общепоселковая скважина / от Воды Донбасса, Попаснянского водоканала, Старобельск Вода, Луганскводы / привозная

2.2 Режим подачи воды 24/7 / по графику

2.3 Какие работы по строительству/ремонту/реконструкции системы водоснабжения или водоотведения нужны в первую очередь?

установка резервуаров для воды/установка фильтров/ремонт системы водоснабжения/водоотведения в социальных учреждениях

2.4 Предусмотрены ли какие-либо из этих работ для финансирования из местного или других бюджетов? да/нет/не готовы ответить сразу

2.4.1 Если да, какие именно работы?

установка резервуаров для воды/установка фильтров/ремонт системы водоснабжения/водоотведения в социальных учреждениях

3. Установка фильтров

3.1 В чем суть проблемы, почему необходима установка фильтров?

3.2 Проводили ли анализ воды? да/нет

3.2.1 Если да, сохранились ли результаты анализа воды? да/нет

3.3 Сколько воды необходимо для приготовления пищи и питья? (л/сутки)

3.2 Кто будет обслуживать фильтр в дальнейшем?

3.3 Кто будет возьмет фильтр на баланс?

3.4 Комментарий "Установка очистных сооружений/фильтров"

4. Установка резервуаров для хранения и подачи воды

4.1 В чем суть проблемы, почему необходима установка резервуаров?

33

4.2 Каким образом резервуары будут наполняться водой?

4.3 Кто будет очищать резервуары и каким образом?

4.4 Комментарий "Установка резервуаров для хранения и подачи воды"

5. Установка насоса

5.1 В чем суть проблемы, почему необходима установка насоса?

5.2 Технические характеристики/название насоса, который должен быть установлен (если требуется замена существующего)

5.3 Комментарий "Установка насоса"

6. Ремонт системы водоснабжения/водоотведения в учреждениях

6.1 Какие работы необходимы?

замена водопровода (внутреннего / наружного) / замена канализации (внутренней / наружной) / ремонт туалетов / строительство септика (выгребной ямы) / другое

6.2 Есть ли проектная документация на реализацию проекта? да/нет

6.2.1 Если есть проектная документация, какой приблизительный бюджет (грн.)

6.3 Комментарий "Ремонт системы водоснабжения/водоотведения в учреждениях"

prepared by - humanitarianresponse · in repairing process and ensuring proper documentation. in...

Documents