preliminary tree assessment ats3278-brigrajunrdpta · preliminary tree assessment ....

Preliminary Tree Assessment ATS3278-BriGraJunRdPTA

Site: Briens and Grand Junction Road, Northfield Date: Monday, 26 October 2015

Arborman Tree Solutions Pty Ltd – Professionals in Arboriculture Phone: (08) 8240 5555 23 Aberdeen Street ATS3278-BRIGRAJUNRDPTA – MONDAY, 26 OCTOBER 2015 Fax: (08) 8240 4525 Port Adelaide SA 5015 Email: [email protected]

Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................ 1

Brief .................................................................................................................................................... 2

Documents & Information Provided .............................................................................................. 2

Site Location ..................................................................................................................................... 3

Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 4

Findings ............................................................................................................................................. 4

Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 5

Recommendation ............................................................................................................................. 6

Glossary ............................................................................................................................................ 7

References ........................................................................................................................................ 7

Appendix A Tree Assessment Methodology

Appendix B Tree Assessment Findings

Appendix C Mapping

Appendix D Tree Findings Summary Table

Report Reference Number: ATS3278-BriGraJunRdPTA

Report prepared for

Intro (Australasia Pty Ltd)

Ben Colmer, Development Manager

Author

Gary Moran Consulting Arborist Arborman Tree Solutions Pty Ltd

of 7


Brief Arborman Tree Solutions was engaged to undertake a Preliminary Tree Assessment at the site location known as Briens and Grand Junction Road, Northfield. The purpose of a Preliminary Tree Assessment is to evaluate trees’ suitability for retention through the identification of hazard/risk and tree retention value. In accordance with section 2.2 of the Australian Standard 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites (2.2), the following information is provided: Assessment of the general condition and structure of the subject trees. Identification of the regulated status of trees on site as defined in the Development Act 1993,

the Native Vegetation Act 1991 and Local Development Plan; and mark on plan.

Risk assessment of tree(s).

The identification of trees considered as requiring or suitable for retention or removal and mark these on a plan.

Identify and define the appropriate Tree Protection Zone and Structural Root Zone for each

tree and mark on plan. Provide information in relation to the management of trees.

Documents & Information Provided The following information was provided for the preparation of this assessment

Site Plan SK-412

of 7


Site Location

Figure 1: Survey site location - Briens and Grand Junction Road, Northfield

of 7


Methodology A site inspection was undertaken on Wednesday, 7 October 2015. The site is predominantly flat and is approximately 4.2 hectares in size. The site is currently of light industrial use. Trees included in this report were mapped using a Trimble Geo7X handheld and assigned a unique number. Individual tree findings were recorded using the Tree Assessment Form (TAF©). Tree Health Indicator (THI©), Tree Structure Assessment (TSA©) and Useful Life Expectancy (ULE), were assessed using those methods described in Appendix A. Trees with a trunk circumference greater than two metres and exempt under local legislation were not included unless requested. Legislative Status was identified for all trees as prescribed under the Development Act 1993. Tree retention was determined by reviewing those principles prescribed under the local development plan or relevant authority and applying these findings in the Tree Retention Rating (TRR©) method, as described within Appendix A. Risk assessment was performed using the International Society of Arboriculture Tree Risk Assessment method. Tree Protection Zones were calculated using the Australian Standard 4970-2009 (Section 3.2). Mapping was performed using GIS and CAD software. Limitations: tree management options such as pruning, soil amelioration, pathogen treatment are

not considered as part of this report; these should be considered in relation to any proposed development.

Findings Findings of the Preliminary Tree Assessment undertaken at Briens and Grand Junction Road, Northfield are presented in Appendix D. Individual tree assessment findings are presented in Appendix B. Tree number location is provided on the site map see Appendix C.

of 7


Discussion Trees identified as worthy of protection are those trees that will provide environmental and or aesthetic contribution to the local area when assessed, therefore conservation of these trees is encouraged. Trees identified as requiring removal are those trees displaying one or a number of the following attributes:- a) Provide little benefit. b) Short lived species or unsuited to location. c) Present an unacceptable risk to persons or property. d) Identified as causing material damage e) Have a limited Useful Life Expectancy. Those trees identified for retention as shown in Appendix D require protection from tree damaging activity. This is best achieved through design that is sympathetic to tree long-term tree viability. This design process should occur in consultation with a Qualified Arborist. The Australian Standard AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites prescribes the use of a Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) as the principle means of protecting trees during development; the development design should avoid encroachment in these areas. The radius of the TPZ for each tree is presented in Appendix D. Development activities that encroach within the identified Tree Protection Zones must be assessed by the Project Arborist, who can determine these impacts and help provide measures to reduce these impacts. This assessment process is best communicated through an Arboricultural Development Impact Report. Trees within this report considered not worthy of retention or recommended for removal may require approval from the relevant authority. Development approval is required for trees recognised as either Regulated or Significant. The regulatory status of each tree is presented in Appendix D of this report. TPZ radii have been provided within the Findings section of this report and in Appendix C Mapping.

of 7


Recommendation The following recommendations are presented based on the Preliminary Tree Assessment:

1. Trees identified as having a High retention value are worthy of protection, as listed in Appendix D, should be conserved.

2. Any trees identified as Regulated, Significant or protected as listed in Appendix D require Development approval prior to any tree damaging activity occurring. This includes tree removal and may include pruning.

3. A Project Arborist should be appointed to assist in the design around trees warranting conservation as identified in in Appendix D and this communicated through a Development Impact Report.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide this report. Should you have any questions or require further information, please contact me and I will be happy to be of assistance. Yours sincerely GARY MORAN Consulting Arboriculturist Advanced Certificate in Arboriculture

of 7


Glossary Size: approximate height and width of tree in metres. Age: identification of the maturity of the subject tree. Useful Life Expectancy: expected number of the years that the subject specimen will

remain alive and sound in its current location and/or continues to achieve the relevant Principles of Development Control.

Health: visual assessment of tree health. Structure: visual assessment of tree structure.

Circumference: trunk circumference measured at one metre above ground level. This measurement is used to determine the status of the tree in relation to the Development Act 1993.

Diameter at Breast Height (DBH): trunk diameter measured at 1.4 metres above ground level used to determine the Tree Protection Zone as described in Australian Standard AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.

Diameter at Root Buttress (DRB): trunk diameter measured just above the root buttress as described in Australian Standard AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites and is used to determine the Structural Root Zone.

Tree Damaging Activity Tree damaging activity includes those activities described within the Development Act 1993 such as removal, killing, lopping, ringbarking or topping or any other substantial damage such as mechanical or chemical damage, filling or cutting of soil within the TPZ. Can also include forms of pruning above and below the ground.

Tree Protection Zone: area of root zone that should be protected to prevent substantial

damage to the tree’s health. Structural Root Zone: calculated area within the tree’s root zone that is considered

essential to maintain tree stability. Project Arborist A person with the responsibility for carrying out a tree assessment,

report preparation, consultation with designers, specifying tree protection measures, monitoring and certification. The Project Arborist must be competent in arboriculture, having acquired through training, minimum Australian Qualification Framework (AQTF) Level 5, Diploma of Horticulture (Arboriculture) and/or equivalent experience, the knowledge and skills enabling that person to perform the tasks required by this standard.

References Australian Standard AS4970–2009 Protection of trees on development sites: Standards Australia. Matheny N. Clark J. 1998: Trees and Development a Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development: International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, USA. Dunster J.A., Smiley E.T., Metheny N. and Lilly S. 2013. Tree Risk Assessment Manual. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois USA.

Arborman Tree Solutions Pty Ltd – Professionals in Arboriculture Phone: (08) 8240 5555 23 Aberdeen Street ATS3054A-HacRdVspPDS V6 – 30 April 2015 Fax: (08) 8240 4525 Port Adelaide SA 5015 Email: [email protected]

Appendix A Tree Assessment Methodology

Tree Assessment Form (TAF©)

Record Description

Tree A perennial woody plant with a mature height of greater than 5 metres and life expectancy of more than 10 years.

Genus and Species

Trees are identified using normal field plant taxonomy techniques. Due to hybridisation and plant conditions available on the day of observation it may not always be possible to identify the tree to species level; where species cannot be ascertained sp. is used.

Height Tree height is observed and recorded in the following ranges; 0-5m, 5-10m, 10-15m and >20m.

Spread Crown width (projection) diameter is recorded by the following fields 0-5m, 5-10m, 10-15m, 15-20m, >20m.

Tree Health Tree health was assessed using the Arborman Tree Solutions - Tree Health Assessment Method that is based on international best practice.

Tree Structure Tree structure was assessed using Arborman Tree Solutions - Tree Structure Assessment Method that is based on international best practice.

Tree Risk Assessment

Trees were assessed using the International Society of Arboriculture Level 1 Tree Assessment method. The person conducting the assessment has acquired the International Society of Arboriculture Tree Risk Assessment Qualification (TRAQ).

Legislative Status

Legislation status was identified through the interpretation of the Development Act 1993, and the Natural Resource Management Act 2004 as well as other relevant legislation, therefore determining regulatory status of the subject tree.

Mitigation

Measures to reduce tree risk may be recommended in the form of pruning and this listed in the Tree Assessment Findings (Appendix C). Tree pruning is recommended in accordance with AS4373-2007 Pruning amenity trees where practicable. Where measures to mitigate risk is not possible and the risk is unacceptable, then tree removal or further investigation is recommended.

Useful Life Expectancy (ULE)

ULE Rating Definition ULE Value

Surpassed The tree has surpassed its Useful Life Expectancy. 0

<2 Years The tree is considered to have a Useful Life Expectancy of less than two years.

1

<5 years The tree is considered to have a Useful Life Expectancy of less than five years.

2

<10 years The tree is considered to have a Useful Life Expectancy of less than ten years.

3

>10 years The tree is considered to have a Useful Life Expectancy of more than ten years.

4

Tree Biodiversity Value Indicator (TBVI©)

Category Description Biodiversity

Value

B1 Tree is not recognised as a tree that provides habitat to local fauna.

1

B2 It is recognised that the tree provides moderate habitat in the form of refuge and/or food source to local fauna.

2

B3 Tree is widely recognised as providing habitat to local fauna.

3

Maturity (Age)

Age Class Definition Value

Senescent

The tree has surpassed its optimum growing period and is declining and/or reducing in size. May be considered as a veteran in relation to its ongoing management. Tree will have generally reached greater than 80% of its expected life expectancy.

1

Mature

A tree which has reached full maturity in terms of its predicted life expectancy and size, the tree is still active and experiencing cell division. Tree will have generally reached 20-80% of its expected life expectancy.

2

Semi Mature

A tree which has established, but has not yet reached maturity. Normally tree establishment practices such as watering will have ceased. Tree will generally not have reached 20% of its expected life expectancy.

3

Juvenile

A newly planted tree or one which is not yet established in the landscape. Tree establishment practices such as regular watering will still be in place. Tree will generally be a newly planted specimen up to five years old; this may be species dependant.

4

Tree Health Indication (THI©)

Category Description Health Value

Good

Tree displays high vigour, uniform leaf colour, no or little dieback (<5%), crown density (>85%) and or healthy axillary buds and typical internode length. The tree has little to no pest and/or disease infestation.

3

Fair

Tree displays low vigour, dull leaf colour, little dieback (<15%), crown density (>70%) and/or reduced axillary buds and internode length. Minor pest and/or disease infestation potentially impacting on tree health.

2

Poor

Tree displays no vigour, chlorotic or dull leaf colour, moderate to high crown dieback (>15%), low crown density (<70%) and/or few or small axillary buds and shortened internode length. Pest and or disease infestation is evident and/or widespread.

1

Dead The tree has died and has no opportunity for recovery. 0

Tree Structural Assessment (TSA©)

Category Description Structure

Value

Good

Little to no branch failure observed within the crown, well-formed unions, no included bark, good branch and trunk taper present, root buttressing and root plate are typical.

3

Fair

History of minor branch failure observed in crown, well-formed unions, no included bark, acceptable branch and trunk taper present, root buttressing and root plate are typical.

2

Poor

History of significant branch failure observed in crown, poorly formed unions, included bark present, branch and trunk taper absent, root buttressing and root plate are atypical.

1

Failed Tree structure. 0

Tree Risk Assessment

The risk assessment was conducted using the principles and guidelines of the International Society of Arboriculture - Tree Risk Assessment Qualification (TRAQ). TRAQ assesses the Tree Risk Rating in three parts that are divided into two stages Likelihood and Consequence; the Likelihood assessment considers two parts Likelihood of Failure and Likelihood of Impact which are combined in a matrix to determine the Likelihood of Impacting a Target. The following categories are used to determine the Likelihood of Impacting a Target for a given tree:- 1. Likelihood of Failure – this is the assessment potential for branch failure. The

likelihood of failure uses the following categories:- a. Imminent the tree is failing or is about to fail i.e.:

>90% chance. b. Probable a failure is likely to occur within the

inspection period i.e.: >50% chance. c. Possible a failure may occur within the

inspection period i.e.: <50% chance. d. Improbable a failure is unlikely to occur within the

inspection period i.e.: <10% chance. 2. Likelihood of Impact – this is an assessment of the potential for a failed branch

to contact a person, vehicle, property or other target within the target area. The likelihood of failure uses the following categories: a. High a failure will almost definitely impact a

target. b. Medium a failure will probably impact a target. c. Low a failure will possibly impact a target. d. Very Low a failure is unlikely to impact a target.

The results of the Likelihood assessment are placed into the following matrix to determine the Likelihood of Impacting a Target.

Likelihood Matrix

Likelihood of Failure

Likelihood of Impacting Target

Very Low Low Medium High

Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely

Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely

Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely

Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely

The Consequence of Failure section of the assessment considers the result of a failure on the target. The following categories are used to determine the Consequences of a failure impacting a Target for a given tree. 3. Consequence of Failure – This is an assessment of the consequence of the branch

failure on the target. Consequence of Failure includes factors such as size of part, the level of damage or injury, target protection and target value (monetary or otherwise). The following categories are used to determine the Consequences of Failure for a given tree:- a. Severe The consequences of an impact will

be severe potentially involving serious injury or death or serious damage to or loss of property or infrastructure.

b. Significant The consequences of an impact will be significant potentially involving major injury or damage to property or infrastructure.

c. Minor The consequences of an impact will be minor potentially involving minor injury or minimal damage to property or infrastructure.

d. Negligible The consequences of an impact will be negligible potentially involving no or inconsequential injury or damage to property or infrastructure.

The Likelihood of Impact and Consequence of Failure are then placed into the following matrix to determine the Tree Risk Rating.

Tree Risk Rating Matrix

Likelihood of Failure & Impact

Consequences of Failure

Negligible Minor Significant Severe

Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme

Likely Low Moderate High High

Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate

Unlikely Low Low Low Low

This Tree Risk Rating is used to qualify the risk so that suitable mitigation strategies can be implemented.

LANDSCAPE RETENTION VALUE (LRV) ©

The Landscape Retention Value was conducted assessing Tree Health and Structure LRV Matrix 1) and then assessing this result against the estimated Useful Life Expectancy (LRV Matric 2). These results were then assessed against the recognised environmental and social benefits that the tree presents (LRV Matrix 2) thereby providing a quantitative measure to determine the tree retention value. LRV MATRIX 1: Structure & Health

Health

Structure Good Fair Poor Dead

Good A1 A1 A2 A3

Fair A1 A2 A2 A3

Poor A3 A3 A3 A3

LRV MATRIX 2: Life Expectancy & structure & Health

LRV Matrix 1

ULE A1 A2 A3

Long High High Med

Med High Med Med

Short Low Low Low

Dead Low Low Low

LANDSCAPE RETENTION VALUE

LRV Matrix 2

Amenity Value High Med Low

Meets all Criteria High High Moderate

Rare and or Endangered High High Moderate

Environmental habitat High Moderate Moderate

Amenity Character High Moderate Low

Minor Contribution i.e. shade/aesthetics

Moderate Low Low

Small or Young Tree Low Low Low

Retention Value (High) These trees are considered important and should be retained and

protected using AS4970-2009

Retention Value (Moderate) These trees are considered for retention and protected using

AS4970-2009

Retention Value (Low) These trees are considered as not requiring special works or design

modifications.

Appendix B Tree Assessment Findings

Tree No: 1Jacaranda mimosifolia

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Jacaranda mimosifolia

5-10 metres

This tree is not regulated under the Development Act 1993.

Jacaranda

Dead

GPS Coordinates (WGS 84) 138.619878685,-34.844111167

Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE

SurpassedUseful Life Expectancy

0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk

UnregulatedLegislative Status

1.35 metresTrunk Circumference

3.48 metresTree Protection Zone (TPZ)

2.2 metresStructural Root Zone (SRZ)

LEGISLATIVE STATUS

Tree Retention Rating

OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS

Tree removal is recommended.

TREE PROTECTION

This tree does not achieve any character, aestetic or environmental

criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 1

Friday, 23 October 2015 Page 1 of 106Intro (Australasia PTY LTD)

Tree No: 2Casuarina glauca


Casuarina glauca

5-10 metres


Swamp Oak

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE

>10 yearsUseful Life Expectancy

0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS

Retain Tree if possible

TREE PROTECTION

Tree provides only minor environmental and or aesthetic contribution to

the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 2




Casuarina glauca

5-10 metres


Swamp Oak

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 3




Casuarina glauca

5-10 metres


Swamp Oak

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 4




Casuarina glauca

10-15 metres


Swamp Oak

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 5




Casuarina glauca

10-15 metres


Swamp Oak

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 6




Casuarina glauca

5-10 metres


Swamp Oak

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 7




Casuarina glauca

5-10 metres


Swamp Oak

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 8




Casuarina glauca

10-15 metres

This tree has a trunk circumference greater than two metres and less

than three metres and is therefore identified as a Regulated Tree as

defined within the Development Act 1993.

There is terminal deadwood throughout the crown.

Swamp Oak

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE

<5 yearsUseful Life Expectancy

5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk

RegulatedLegislative Status




LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 9


Tree No: 10Eucalyptus woodwardii


Eucalyptus woodwardii

10-15 metres


Lemon Flowered Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 10


Tree No: 11Brachychiton discolor


Brachychiton discolor

5-10 metres





Lacebark Tree

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 11


Tree No: 12Callitris gracilis


Callitris gracilis

5-10 metres




Slender Cypress Pine

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION

This tree is identified as providing important habitat to native fauna.

FairStructure

Moderate

Tree No: 12


Tree No: 13Eucalyptus sp.


Eucalyptus sp.

10-15 metres


Gum Tree

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 13


Tree No: 14Eucalyptus torquata


Eucalyptus torquata

10-15 metres


Coral Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 14




Eucalyptus sp.

15-20 metres

This tree has a trunk circumference greater than three metres and is

therefore identified as a Significant Tree as defined within the

Development Act 1993.

There is a bark inclusion within the main union.

Gum Tree

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


15-20 metresSpread

LowRisk

SignificantLegislative Status




LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION

This tree achieves character and/or aesthetic criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 15




Eucalyptus sp.

15-20 metres





Gum Tree

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 16




Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres


There is deadwood throughout the crown.

Gum Tree

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 17




Eucalyptus sp.

15-20 metres





Gum Tree

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


15-20 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 18




Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres


This tree has a history of lateral branch failure.

Gum Tree

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 19


Tree No: 20Olea europaea


Olea europaea

5-10 metres

This species of tree is exempt from control under the current provisions of

the Development Act 1993.


Common Olive

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk

ExemptLegislative Status




LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 20


Tree No: 21Olea europaea


Olea europaea

5-10 metres



Common Olive

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 21


Tree No: 22Eucalyptus camaldulensis


Eucalyptus camaldulensis

5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 22





>20 metres





River Red Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


>20 metresSpread

LowRisk




4 metresStructural Root Zone (SRZ)

LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS

Veteran Tree Management is recommended

TREE PROTECTION

This tree achieves character, aesthetic and environmental criteria.

PoorStructure

High

Tree No: 23





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 24





10-15 metres





River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


PoorStructure

Moderate

Tree No: 25





5-10 metres



River Red Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 26





10-15 metres


River Red Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 27





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 28





5-10 metres



River Red Gum

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 29





10-15 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 30





5-10 metres





River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 31


Tree No: 32Corymbia maculata


Corymbia maculata

5-10 metres



Spotted Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk



3 metresTree Protection Zone (TPZ)


LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 32


Tree No: 33Corymbia maculata


Corymbia maculata

5-10 metres



Spotted Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 33


Tree No: 34Corymbia citriodora


Corymbia citriodora

10-15 metres


Lemon Scented Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


15-20 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 34


Tree No: 35Acacia salicina


Acacia salicina

5-10 metres


The species has suckering issues.

Native Willow

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 35




Acacia salicina

5-10 metres



Native Willow

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 36




Acacia salicina

5-10 metres



Native Willow

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 37




Acacia salicina

5-10 metres


This tree is of poor overall form.

Native Willow

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 38


Tree No: 39Eucalyptus sideroxylon


Eucalyptus sideroxylon

15-20 metres




The main union is separating.

Mugga or Red Ironbark

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


15-20 metresSpread

HighRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 39


Tree No: 40Eucalyptus leucoxylon


Eucalyptus leucoxylon

5-10 metres


South Australian Blue Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 40


Tree No: 41Eucalyptus spathulata


Eucalyptus spathulata

5-10 metres





Swamp Mallet

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 41


Tree No: 42Eucalyptus sideroxylon


Eucalyptus sideroxylon

10-15 metres


Mugga or Red Ironbark

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 42




Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres


Gum Tree

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 43




Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres


Gum Tree

Dead


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 44


Tree No: 45Eucalyptus woodwardii


Eucalyptus woodwardii

5-10 metres



Lemon Flowered Gum

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 45


Tree No: 46Eucalyptus cladocalyx


Eucalyptus cladocalyx

5-10 metres


Sugar Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 46




Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres



Gum Tree

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 47




Eucalyptus torquata

5-10 metres



Coral Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 48





10-15 metres




River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


Good Structure

High

Tree No: 49





10-15 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 50





5-10 metres


Sugar Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 51





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk


1 metresTrunk Circumference



LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 52


Tree No: 53Eucalyptus occidentalis


Eucalyptus occidentalis

5-10 metres



Swamp Yate

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 53




Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres




Gum Tree

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


FairStructure

Moderate

Tree No: 54


Tree No: 55Corymbia citriodora


Corymbia citriodora

5-10 metres



Lemon Scented Gum

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 55


Tree No: 56Pittosporum undulatum


Pittosporum undulatum

5-10 metres



Sweet Pittosporum*

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 56



Thursday, 8 October 2015

Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres


Gum Tree

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 57





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 58





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 59




Eucalyptus sp.

5-10 metres


Gum Tree

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 60





5-10 metres



River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 61





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 62





10-15 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 63





10-15 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 64


Tree No: 65Syagrus romanzoffiana


Syagrus romanzoffiana

5-10 metres


Cocos Palm

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 65


Tree No: 66Hymenosporum flavum


Hymenosporum flavum

5-10 metres


Native Frangipani

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 66





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 67





5-10 metres



River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 68





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 69




Eucalyptus torquata

5-10 metres


Coral Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 70





10-15 metres


Sugar Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 71





5-10 metres


Sugar Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 72





10-15 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 73





10-15 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 74




Eucalyptus torquata

5-10 metres




There are multiple bark inclusions within the primary structure.

Coral Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 75





5-10 metres


River Red Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 76


Tree No: 77Agonis flexuosa


Agonis flexuosa

5-10 metres



Willow Myrtle

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 77


Tree No: 78Agonis flexuosa


Agonis flexuosa

5-10 metres



Willow Myrtle

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 78




Eucalyptus torquata

5-10 metres



Coral Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 79


Tree No: 80Corymbia ficifolia


Corymbia ficifolia

5-10 metres


There are multiple bark inclusions within the primary structure.

Red Flowering Gum

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 80


Tree No: 81Schinus areira


Schinus areira

5-10 metres



Peppercorn

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 81


Tree No: 82Lophostemon confertus


Lophostemon confertus

5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 82





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 83





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 84





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 85





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 86





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 87


Tree No: 88Fraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa 'Raywood'


Fraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa

'Raywood'

5-10 metres



Claret Ash

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 88





'Raywood'

5-10 metres



Claret Ash

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 89





'Raywood'

5-10 metres


There is considerable epicormic growth throughout the crown.

Claret Ash

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 90





'Raywood'

5-10 metres


There is considerable epicormic growth throughout the crown.

Claret Ash

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 91





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 92





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


0-5 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 93





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 94





5-10 metres



Brush Box

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 95





5-10 metres


Brush Box

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 96




Schinus areira

5-10 metres




Peppercorn

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

PoorStructure

Low

Tree No: 97




Schinus areira

10-15 metres



Peppercorn

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


Good Structure

High

Tree No: 98





'Raywood'

5-10 metres



Claret Ash

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

Good Structure

Low

Tree No: 99





'Raywood'

5-10 metres


Claret Ash

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 100





'Raywood'

5-10 metres


Claret Ash

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 101





'Raywood'

10-15 metres


Claret Ash

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


10-15 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 102





'Raywood'

10-15 metres




Claret Ash

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


15-20 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


Good Structure

High

Tree No: 103


Tree No: 104Melaleuca nesophila


Melaleuca nesophila

5-10 metres


Showy Honey Myrtle

Good


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 104





'Raywood'

5-10 metres


Claret Ash

Fair


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


the local area.

Good Structure

Moderate

Tree No: 105





'Raywood'

5-10 metres



Claret Ash

Poor


Health

Height

COMMON NAME

BOTANIC NAME

INSPECTION DATE


5-10 metresSpread

LowRisk





LEGISLATIVE STATUS


OBSERVATIONS/ NOTES

RECOMMENDATIONS


TREE PROTECTION


criteria.

FairStructure

Low

Tree No: 106


Appendix C Mapping

Appendix D – Tree Assessment Summary

Tree Assessment Summary

Retention

Rating

Botanic Name RecomendationLegislative

Status

Risk Rating TPZ SRZTree

Number

1 UnregulatedJacaranda mimosifolia 2.2 metres Low3.48 metres Remove TreeLow

2 UnregulatedCasuarina glauca 1.53 metres Low2.00 metres No ActionModerate


4 UnregulatedCasuarina glauca 1.85 metres Low2.00 metres No ActionLow


6 UnregulatedCasuarina glauca 1.97 metres Low3.24 metres No ActionLow

7 UnregulatedCasuarina glauca 1.97 metres Low2.28 metres Remove TreeLow

Monday, 26 October 2015 Page 1 of 16Briens and Grand Juction Roads, Northfield


Retention

Rating


Status


Number

8 UnregulatedCasuarina glauca 1.72 metres Low2.00 metres Remove TreeLow

9 RegulatedCasuarina glauca 2.81 metres Low7.44 metres Remove TreeLow

10 UnregulatedEucalyptus woodwardii 2.69 metres Low6.72 metres No ActionLow

11 RegulatedBrachychiton discolor 2.97 metres Low8.52 metres Remove TreeLow

12 RegulatedCallitris gracilis 2.63 metres Low5.28 metres No ActionModerate

13 UnregulatedEucalyptus sp. 2.63 metres Low5.04 metres No ActionLow

14 UnregulatedEucalyptus torquata 2.65 metres Low6.48 metres No ActionLow



Retention

Rating


Status


Number

15 SignificantEucalyptus sp. 3.11 metres Low8.88 metres Remove TreeLow

16 RegulatedEucalyptus sp. 2.92 metres Low8.04 metres Remove TreeLow

17 UnregulatedEucalyptus sp. 1.72 metres Low2.16 metres Remove TreeLow

18 SignificantEucalyptus sp. 3.47 metres Low12.48 metres

Remove TreeLow


20 ExemptOlea europaea 2.05 metres Low3.24 metres Remove TreeLow

21 ExemptOlea europaea 2.18 metres Low2.76 metres No ActionLow



Retention

Rating


Status


Number

22 UnregulatedEucalyptus camaldulensis 1.82 metres Low2.64 metres No ActionLow

23 SignificantEucalyptus camaldulensis 4 metres Low15.00 metres

Veteran Tree Management

High


25 RegulatedEucalyptus camaldulensis 3.15 metres Low10.08 metres

Remove TreeModerate

26 UnregulatedEucalyptus camaldulensis 2.18 metres Low4.08 metres Remove TreeLow





Retention

Rating


Status


Number


30 UnregulatedEucalyptus camaldulensis 2.69 metres Low6.72 metres No ActionModerate

31 RegulatedEucalyptus camaldulensis 2.63 metres Low5.16 metres Remove TreeLow

32 UnregulatedCorymbia maculata 1.91 metres Low3 metres Remove TreeLow

33 UnregulatedCorymbia maculata 2.45 metres Low4.8 metres Remove TreeLow

34 UnregulatedCorymbia citriodora 2.87 metres Low7.44 metres No ActionLow

35 UnregulatedAcacia salicina 1.82 metres Low2.04 metres Remove TreeLow



Retention

Rating


Status


Number




39 SignificantEucalyptus sideroxylon 3.24 metres High11.16 metres

Remove TreeLow

40 UnregulatedEucalyptus leucoxylon 1.97 metres Low3.12 metres No ActionModerate

41 RegulatedEucalyptus spathulata 3.14 metres Low9.72 metres Remove TreeLow

42 UnregulatedEucalyptus sideroxylon 2.65 metres Low6.48 metres No ActionLow



Retention

Rating


Status


Number

43 UnregulatedEucalyptus sp. 2.45 metres Low4.8 metres No ActionModerate


45 UnregulatedEucalyptus woodwardii 2.2 metres Low3.12 metres Remove TreeLow

46 UnregulatedEucalyptus cladocalyx 1.94 metres Low3 metres No ActionModerate


48 UnregulatedEucalyptus torquata 2.02 metres Low3.24 metres Remove TreeLow

49 RegulatedEucalyptus camaldulensis 2.92 metres Low8.16 metres No ActionHigh



Retention

Rating


Status


Number


51 UnregulatedEucalyptus cladocalyx 2.15 metres Low3.96 metres No ActionLow


53 UnregulatedEucalyptus occidentalis 2.15 metres Low3.96 metres Remove TreeLow

54 SignificantEucalyptus sp. 3.11 metres Low9.36 metres No ActionModerate

55 UnregulatedCorymbia citriodora 2.23 metres Low4.2 metres Remove TreeLow

56 UnregulatedPittosporum undulatum 1.88 metres Low2.64 metres Remove TreeLow



Retention

Rating


Status


Number










Retention

Rating


Status


Number


65 UnregulatedSyagrus romanzoffiana 2.15 metres Low4.2 metres No ActionLow

66 UnregulatedHymenosporum flavum 2.05 metres Low3.48 metres No ActionModerate




70 UnregulatedEucalyptus torquata 1.97 metres Low3.12 metres No ActionLow



Retention

Rating


Status


Number

71 UnregulatedEucalyptus cladocalyx 2.13 metres Low3.84 metres No ActionModerate

72 UnregulatedEucalyptus cladocalyx 1.53 metres Low2.00 metres No ActionModerate

73 UnregulatedEucalyptus camaldulensis 2.55 metres Low6 metres No ActionModerate


75 RegulatedEucalyptus torquata 2.39 metres Low7.08 metres Remove TreeLow


77 UnregulatedAgonis flexuosa 2.02 metres Low3.12 metres Remove TreeLow



Retention

Rating


Status


Number

78 UnregulatedAgonis flexuosa 2.05 metres Low3.36 metres Remove TreeLow

79 UnregulatedEucalyptus torquata 1.94 metres Low3 metres Remove TreeLow

80 UnregulatedCorymbia ficifolia 2.34 metres Low4.68 metres Remove TreeLow

81 ExemptSchinus areira 2.53 metres Low5.76 metres No ActionModerate

82 UnregulatedLophostemon confertus 1.91 metres Low3.36 metres Remove TreeLow





Retention

Rating


Status


Number




88 UnregulatedFraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa

'Raywood'

2.05 metres Low3.48 metres Remove TreeLow


'Raywood'



'Raywood'




Retention

Rating


Status


Number


'Raywood'






96 UnregulatedLophostemon confertus 2.45 metres Low3.48 metres No ActionModerate



Retention

Rating


Status


Number

97 ExemptSchinus areira 2.37 metres Low3.72 metres Remove TreeLow

98 ExemptSchinus areira 3.2 metres Low9.72 metres No ActionHigh


'Raywood'



'Raywood'

2.51 metres Low5.64 metres No ActionModerate


'Raywood'

2.65 metres Low6.12 metres No ActionLow


'Raywood'




Retention

Rating


Status


Number

103 SignificantFraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa

'Raywood'

2.8 metres Low7.92 metres No ActionHigh

104 UnregulatedMelaleuca nesophila 2.2 metres Low4.2 metres No ActionLow


'Raywood'



'Raywood'



Appendix E Tree Protection Zone Guidelines

Tree Protection Area General Specifications & Guidelines The Tree Protection Zone(s) is identified on the site plan. The TPZ is an area where construction activities are regulated for the purposes of protecting tree viability. The TPZ should be established so that it clearly identifies and precludes development/construction activities including personnel. If development activities are required within the TPZ then these activities must be reviewed and approved by the Project Arborist. Prior to approval, the Project Arborist must be certain that the tree(s) will remain viable as a result of this activity. Work Activities Excluded from the Tree Protection Zone:

a) Machine excavation including trenching;

b) Excavation for silt fencing;

c) Cultivation;

d) Storage;

e) Preparation of chemicals, including preparation of cement products;

f) Parking of vehicles and plant;

g) Refuelling;

h) Dumping of waste;

i) Wash down and cleaning of equipment;

j) Placement of fill;

k) Lighting of fires;

l) Soil level changes;

m) Temporary or permanent installation of utilities and signs, and

n) Physical damage to the tree. Protective Fencing Protective fencing must be installed around the identified Tree Protection Zone (See Figure1). The fencing should by chain wire panels and compliant with AS4687. Shade cloth or similar material should be attached around the fence to reduce dust, other particulates and liquids entering the protected area. Temporary fencing on 28kg bases are recommended for use as this eliminates any excavation requirements to install fencing. Excavation increase the likelihood of root damage therefore should be avoided where possible throughout the project. Existing perimeter fencing and other structures may be utilised as part of the protective fencing. Any permanent fencing should be post and rail with the set out determined in consultation with the Project Arborist. Where the erection of the fence is not practical the Project Arborist is to approve alternative measures.

Figure 1 Showing example of protection fencing measures suitable. Signage The TPZ must be clearly identified with signs placed around the edge of the TPZ and be visible within the development site. Lettering on the sign should comply with AS 1319.

Other Protection Measures General When a TPZ exclusion area cannot be established due to practical reasons or the area needs to be entered to undertake construction activities then additional tree protection measures may need to be adopted. Protection measures should be compliant with AS4970-2009 and approved by the Project Arborist Installation of Scaffolding within Tree Protection Area. Where scaffolding is required within the TPZ branch removal should be minimised. Any branch removal required should be approved by the Project Arborist and performed by a certified Arborist and performed in accordance with AS4373-2007. Approval to prune branches must be documented and maintained. Ground below scaffold should be protected by boarding (e.g scaffold board or plywood sheeting) as shown in Figure below. The boarding should be left in place until scaffolding is removed. Figure 1 – Showing scaffold constructed within TPZ.