preliminary study of a guywire supported single point moored … · preliminary study of a guywire...
TRANSCRIPT
1CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
Kitakyushu, 8th of July 2019
Preliminary Study of a Guywire Supported Single Point Moored Floating Offshore Wind Turbine System
Shigeo Yoshida, Professor
Research Institute for Applied Mechanics
Kyushu University
2CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Project Outline
3. Design Outline
4. At-Sea Experiment
5. Summary
Reference: Report W-03, FY2018 NEDO Report Meeting, 2018.
3CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
1. Introduction
1. Introduction
2. Project Outline
3. Design Outline
4. At-Sea Experiment
5. Summary
4CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
⚫ Goals:
- LCOE Reduction
- High Penetration
⚫ Approaches:
- Aero-/Hydro-dynamics
- Aero-elastics
- Control
Diversify Wind Energy Technologies
Incr
easi
ng
Size
of
Win
d T
urb
ine
s an
d W
ind
Far
ms
Wake Modeling
Kite Wind Power
Wind Farm Layout
Aerodynamics (IEA Wind)
Aero/Elastic/Control Models
Multi-Rotor System
Floating DTs(MOE/METI/CEPCO)
Innovative Floating DT (NEDO)
Super-Large WT
Control (JSCE)
Commercial DTs(IEA Wind/NEDO)
Commercial
Future
Future
1.1 Research Outlines of KU-RIAM-REIUS
Hydrodynamics
5CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
2. Project Outline
1. Introduction
2. Project Outline
3. Design Outline
4. At-Sea Experiment
5. Summary
6CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
2.1 Project Outline
D=140mP=6MW
Total2,400t (excl. ballast)=160kg/m2
Turretmooring
Guywire
Hybridfloater
Super Compact DriveDownwind rotorFixed yaw
System Outline
Inclinedtower
• Project: Next Generation Floating Offshore Wind Turbine System Demonstration Project (Elemental Technologies), NEDO
• Term: 2016/12-2018/03
• Goal: 20JPY/kWh (2030)
• Representative Technical Problems
- Guywire supported steel-PC structure.
- Turret + catenary mooring.
- Yawing characteristics.
7CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
2.2 Scheme and ResponsibilitiesC
o-P
ro
po
sers
Reco
mm
isio
nin
gs
Resp
on
sib
ilit
y
Flo
ati
ng
Tu
rb
ine D
esi
gn
Co
up
led
An
aly
sis
Mo
del,
Desi
gn
Lo
ad
Flo
ate
r-T
ow
er
Desi
gn
Tu
rret
Desi
gn
, M
an
ufa
ctu
rin
g, T
est
Fu
ll S
teel
Flo
ate
r B
asi
c D
esi
gn
Ma
nu
factu
rin
g, C
on
stru
cti
on
, M
on
ito
rin
g
Gu
y W
ire T
en
sio
n T
un
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g
Mari
ne G
row
th P
rote
cti
on
Co
nst
ructi
on
Flo
ate
r P
art
s F
ab
ricati
on
Tri
al
an
d T
est
Tan
k T
est
Ela
stic
Mo
del
Ta
nk
Test
Mo
ori
ng
Tan
k T
est
Sti
ff M
od
el
Tan
k T
est
Ela
stic
Mo
del
Tan
k T
est
Fu
rth
er I
mp
ro
vem
en
t
To
wer
Cro
ss S
ecti
on
Co
ntr
ol
Gu
yw
ire L
igh
tnin
g T
est
Desi
gn
Co
nd
itio
n
Eco
no
mic
s E
va
lua
tio
n
Eco
no
mic
Ev
alu
ati
on
At-
Sea
Ex
perim
en
t
Mo
del
Ex
peri
men
t
NEDO
T1
T1
-1
T1
-2
T1
-3
T1
-4
T2
T2
-1
T2
-2
T2
-3
T2
-4
T2
-5
T3
T3
-1
T3
-2
T3
-3
T4
T4
-1
T4
-2
T4
-3
T4
-4
T5
T5
-1
T6
T6
-1
T6
-2
L aerodyn Japan T1) Floating Turbine Design O O O O O
L Kansai Design Co Float Dynamics, Mooring o O
L Fuji PS T2) Manufacturing, Construction, Monitoring O O
L Komaihaltec Tower, Guywire O
L Tsuneishi Shipbuilding Floater Steel Structure O o
L Yorigami Marine Const Construction O
L NMRI T3) Tank Test O O O O
L Univ. of Tokyo(Suzuki) Floater Test Result Evaluation o o o
L Osaka Pref. Univ. Floater Test Data Analysis o o o
L Kyushu Univ. T4) Further Improvement, T6) At-Sea Exp O o O O O O O
L Univ. of Tokyo(Arakawa) Tower Aerodynamics O
L Glocal T5) Economics Evaluation O O O
8CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
3. Design Outline
1. Introduction
2. Project Outline
3. Design Outline
4. At-Sea Experiment
5. Summary
9CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
3.1 Dimensions
10CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
3.2 Stability
Damage CriteriaMost Critical Value
Damage Condition at Most CriticalItem Required Damaged Compartment AxisGM > 1.0 m 34.66 m UW Leg Compartment All
2nd - 1st intercepts > 7.0° 24.87° SB DW Connector 270°Area Ratio > 1.0 5.48 SB DW Connector 180°
Inclination after damage < 17° 9.66° SB DW Leg Compartment 150°
Damage CriteriaMost Critical Value
Damage Condition at Most CriticalItem Required Damaged Compartment AxisGM > 1.0 m 11.03 m SB DW Buoy Compartment All
2nd - 1st intercepts > 7.0° 21.20° UW Connector 330°Area Ratio > 1.0 6.21 UW Connector 270°
Inclination after damage < 17° 10.34° UW Connector 270°
Damage Stability:Operation (Top)
Intact Stability:Operation (Left)Towing (Right)
Towing (Bottom)
11CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
3.3 Floater PC Structure
Deformation at 1 Wire Failure
Stress at an Ultimate Condition (PC)
12CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
3.4 Guywire Tension
13CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
3.5 Yaw Characteristics
14CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
4. At-sea Experiment
1. Introduction
2. Project Outline
3. Design Outline
4. At-Sea Experiment
5. Summary
15CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
4.1 At-sea experiment
App. 7m
Anchor Radius=30~40m
Ro
tor
Dia
me
ter=
14
m
Hu
b H
eig
ht=
Ap
p.
10
m
Ap
p. 1
0m
12
m
Water Depth around the Site[NEDO, NeoWins, 2018]
16CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
4.2 Power Production Characteristics
(1) Power Production Characteristics
• Power production characteristics were confirmed.
• The yaw misalignment of the floater was shown to be smaller as wind speed increases.
17CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
4.3 Idling Characteristics
(2) Idling Characteristics
• The yaw misalignments is smaller as wind speed increases.
• It is about 7deg 6m/s (19m/s at full scale).
18CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
4.4 Start-up and Emergency Stop Characteristics
(3) Start-up Characteristics
• The rotor yawing moment directs the floater to minus.
(4) Emergency Stop Characteristics
• The floater inclines from +2.5deg to -4.0deg in the emergency stop.
19CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
5. Summary
1. Introduction
2. Project Outline
3. Design Outline
4. At-Sea Experiment
5. Summary
20CDTI-NEDO Joint Workshop on Offshore Wind
5.1 Summary
• Typical design conditions were defined.
• Wind turbine, floater, and the mooring system were designed for the assumed design condition.
• The PC (prestressed concrete) was shown to be strong and stiff enough through the manufacturing trial tests.
• Procedures of production and installation were planned.
• Basic characteristics were measured through the tanks tests of 1:30 stiff model, 1:15 elastic model, mooring characteristics, guywire supported model, and 1:10 at-sea experiment.
• At 5 units at 8m/s of annual wind speed 20JPY/kWh.
• Tower aerodynamic characteristics were measured at the high Reynolds number wind tunnel test.
THANK YOU
ありがとうございます
GRACIAS
Shigeo Yoshida
Research Institute for Applied Mechanics,
Kyushu University
For further information