precision measurements of the casimir force and problems of statistical physics

24
Precision measurements of the Casimir force and problems of statistical physics G. L. Klimchitskaya Central Astronomical Observatory at Pulkovo of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Upload: megan

Post on 25-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Precision measurements of the Casimir force and problems of statistical physics. G. L. Klimchitskaya. Central Astronomical Observatory at Pulkovo of the Russian Academy of Sciences. CONTENT. Introduction What experiments say: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Precision measurements of the Casimir force and problems

of statistical physics

G. L. Klimchitskaya

Central Astronomical Observatory at Pulkovo of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Page 2: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

CONTENT

1. Introduction2. What experiments say: 2.1. Measurements with Au-Au test bodies at room temperature 2.2. Measurements with Au-Au test bodies at 77K 2.3. Measurements with ferromagnetic Ni-Ni test bodies at room temperature 2.4. Optical modulation of the Casimir force 2.5. Measurements of thermal Casimir-Polder force3. The Lifshitz theory and the Nernst heat theorem4. Conclusions

Page 3: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

1. INTRODUCTION

Casimir, 1948

The Casimir force arises due to the change of the spectrum of zero-point oscillations of the electromagneticfield by material boundaries.

Page 4: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

BRIEF FORMULATION OF THE LIFSHITZ THEORY

Lifshitz, 1956

are the Matsubara frequencies.

Page 5: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Reflection coefficients for two independent polarizations:

Page 6: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Models of the frequency-dependent dielectric permittivity

Permittivity of dielectric platesas determined by core electrons

Permittivity of dielectric plateswith dc conductivity included

The Drude model permittivity for metallic plates

The plasma model permittivity for metallic plates

Page 7: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Proximity force approximation for a sphere above a plate:

Derjaguin, Kolloid. J. (1934).Blocki, Randrup, Swiatecki, Tsang, Ann. Phys. (1977).Bimonte, Emig, Kardar, Appl. Phys. Lett. (2012)Teo, PRD (2013).

Page 8: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

2. WHAT EXPERIMENTS SAY

2.1 Measurements with Au-Au test bodies at room temperature The gradient of the Casimir force between a sphere and a plate Is measured using:

a) micromachined oscillator Decca, Lopez, Fischbach, Klimchitskaya, Krause, Mostepanenko, PRD (2003); Ann. Phys. (2005); PRD (2007); EPJC (2007); Decca, Lopez, Osquiguil, IJMPA (2010).

b) atomic force microscope Chang, Banishev, Castillo-Garza, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, Mohideen, PRB (2012).

Page 9: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Shematic setup

Schematic setup with a micromachined oscillator

Page 10: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Force sensitivity 10-17 N possible

We achieve 10-13N

Schematic setup with an atomic force microscope

Page 11: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Comparison between experiment and theory

The relative experimental error (at a 95% confidence level) varies from 0.19% at 162 nm to 0.9% at 400 nm and 9% at 746 nm.

The Drude model is excluded by the data at a 95% confidence level.

Page 12: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Comparison between two experiments

Measurement data obtained using an AFM are shown as crosseswith total experimental errors determined at a 67% confidence level. Black (a) and white (b) lines showmeasurement results obtained usinga micromachined oscillator.

Page 13: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

2.2 Measurements with Au-Au test bodies at T=77K

The gradient of the Casimir force between a sphere and a plate is measured using an atomic force microscope adapted for operating at low temperatures Castillo-Garza, Xu, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, Mohideen, PRB (2013).

Page 14: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Comparison with measurements at room temperature

T=77K, a=234nm T=300K, a=235nm

Page 15: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

2.3 Measurements with Ni-Ni test bodies at room temperature

The gradient of the Casimir force between a sphere and a plate covered by ferromagnetic Ni layers is measured using an atomic force microscope Banishev, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, Mohideen, PRL (2013), PRB (2013).

Page 16: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Comparison between experiment and theory

Page 17: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

1. Need to increase carrier density from 1014 (impure dielectric) to 1019 /cc (metal):

long lifetimes + thin membranes

2. Flat bands at surface and no surface charge charge traps:

control electrostatic forces

3. Allow excitation from bottom to reduce photon pressure systematics

4. Need 2-3 micron thick samples to reduce transmitted photon force (optical absorption depth of Silicon= 1 micron)

LASER

Silicon Membrane

2.4 Optical modulation of the Casimir force

Page 18: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Comparison of experiment with theoryusing different models of permittivity

Within error bars one cannot discriminate between Drude and plasma model for high-conductivity silicon

Inclusion of DC conductivity for high-resistivity Si (in dark phase) does not agree with experimental results

Chen, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, Mohideen,Optics Express (2007); PRB (2007).

Page 19: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Obrecht, Wild, Antezza, Pitaevskii, Stringari, Cornell, PRL (2007);Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, JPA (2008).

2.5 Measurement of the thermal Casimir-Polder force through center-of-mass oscillations of Bose-Einstein condensate

Page 20: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

3. THE LIFSHITZ THEORY AND THE NERNST HEAT THEOREM

Casimir entropy:

According to the Nernst theorem, this constant MUST NOT DEPENDon parameters of a system.

Page 21: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Ideal metals Metals described by theplasma model

Mitter, Robaschik,Eur. Phys. J. B (2000).

Bezerra, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko,PRA (2002).

Page 22: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

Metals described by the Drude model

Perfect crystal lattice Lattice with impurities

Bezerra, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, Romero, PRA (2004); Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, PRE (2008).

Hoye, Brevik, Ellingsen, Aarseth,PRE (2007), PRE (2008)..

Page 23: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

For metallic plates described by the Drude model:

Bezerra, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, PRA (2002);Bezerra, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, Romero, PRA (2004).

Geyer, Klimchitskaya, Mostepanenko, PRD (2005).

For dielectric plates with account of dc conductivity:

Page 24: Precision   measurements  of  the Casimir  force  and  problems of statistical physics

4. CONCLUSIONS4. CONCLUSIONS

1. Thermal Casimir effect allows new experimental tests of 1. Thermal Casimir effect allows new experimental tests of fundamental physical theoriesfundamental physical theories

2. There are contradictions between theoretical predictions of2. There are contradictions between theoretical predictions of the Lifshitz theory and basic principles of thermodynamicsthe Lifshitz theory and basic principles of thermodynamics

3. The same predictions are also in contradiction with several 3. The same predictions are also in contradiction with several experiments performed by three experimental groups withexperiments performed by three experimental groups with metallic, dielectric and semiconductor test bodies.metallic, dielectric and semiconductor test bodies.

4. After 14 years of active discussions the opinion becomes4. After 14 years of active discussions the opinion becomes popular that the problem cannot be solved without seriouspopular that the problem cannot be solved without serious changes in basic concepts of statistical physics concerning changes in basic concepts of statistical physics concerning the interaction of quantum fluctuations with matter.the interaction of quantum fluctuations with matter.