practical guidance in selecting materials for product...

39
Practical Guidance in Selecting Materials for Product Functionality Byron J. Lambert, Ph.D. Fellow, Sterilization Science Abbott Vascular Temecula, CA USA [email protected] www.doubleia.org

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

13 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Practical Guidance in Selecting Materials for Product Functionality

    Byron J. Lambert, Ph.D.Fellow, Sterilization Science

    Abbott Vascular Temecula, CA USA

    [email protected]

    www.doubleia.org

  • Agendage da

    1. Material Compatibility Guidancel G id2. Protocol Guidance

    3. Industry Guidance

    www.doubleia.org

  • 1. Material Compatibility Guidance

    A i fA. Build on fundamentals

    • The foundation of successful sterilization strategies are the fundamentals of radiation chemistry and biochemistry:chemistry and biochemistry:• Radiation yields (G-values)

    Di t i di t ff t• Oxygen effects

    M i t ff t• Direct vs indirect effects• Free radical species & scavengers

    • Moisture effects• Thermal effects

    www.doubleia.org

  • • Guidance can only give general rules of thumb (based on fundamentals like those presented by Dr. Parsons)

    – Irradiate in the solid / frozen state, when feasible, to avoid secondary chemistry

    – Select appropriate scavengers when irradiating in the liquid state to minimize degradation outside the cell

    www.doubleia.org

  • IMRP’08 A T ll ti Mi bi l R di ti RA. Tallentire – Microbial Radiation Response

    www.doubleia.org

  • IMRP’08 A T ll ti Mi bi l R di ti RA. Tallentire – Microbial Radiation Response

    Surviviing Fracction

    (+ O2)

    www.doubleia.org

    DOSE

  • IMRP’08 A T ll ti Mi bi l R di ti RA. Tallentire – Microbial Radiation Response

    Surviviing Fracction

    (+ O2) (- O2)liquid

    www.doubleia.org

    DOSE

  • IMRP’08 A T ll ti Mi bi l R di ti RA. Tallentire – Microbial Radiation Response

    Surviviing Frac (- O2)solidction

    (+ O2)

    www.doubleia.org

    DOSE

  • Analogous Effects on Active Agents?a ogous ects o ct ve ge ts?

    (+ O2)Active

    ( 2)

    AgentLLoss

    www.doubleia.org

    DOSE

  • Analogous Effects on Active Agents? a ogous ects o ct ve ge ts?

    (+ O2) ( O )Active

    ( 2) (- O2)liquid

    AgentLLoss

    www.doubleia.org

    DOSE

  • Analogous Effects on Active Agents? a ogous ects o ct ve ge ts?

    (+ O2)Active

    ( 2)

    AgentL

    (- O2)solid

    Loss

    www.doubleia.org

    DOSE

  • Analogous Effects on Active Agents? a ogous ects o ct ve ge ts?

    (+ O2)Active

    ( 2)

    (+ O2 + H2O)AgentL

    2 2

    Loss

    www.doubleia.org

    DOSE

  • Experiments can optimize the application and processingExperiments can optimize the application and processing range of a combination device drug*

    1) I d h i t i t t?1) Is secondary chemistry important? 2) Is the release polymer important?3) Is oxygen or water important? 4) Is temperature important?

    * You also need to answer a similar list of questions to unravel radiation effects on thedevice and on the release polymer …

    www.doubleia.org

  • 1. Material Compatibility Guidance

    B L i ti idB. Leverage existing guidance

    R l ti di ti t bilit di l d i• Relative radiation stability – medical device polymeric materials - AAMI TIR17

    Rules of thumbs– Rules of thumbs– General principles

    www.doubleia.org

  • 5004003002001000

    Relative Radiation Stability of Medical Polymer "Families"Dose (Kilogray) in Ambient Air at which Elongation Decreases by 25%

    kGy25 50

    Polystyrenes

    Polyethylenes

    Polyesters

    Thermosets

    1

    2

    High Performance

    Polycarbonate/

    Polyurethanes

    PVC

    Engineering Resins

    Polysulfone

    2

    3

    PVC

    Fluoropolymers

    Elastomers

    High Performance

    ABS

    5

    4

    6

    879

    Acrylic (PMMA) &

    Nylon(PolyAmides)

    Cellulose &

    Polypropylene(Radiation Grades)

    Co-Polymers

    Co-Polymers

    This chart represents the best available data as of this date,NOTE:

    (1) Residual & Functional Stress,(2) Section Thickness

    10

    12

    13

    14

    11

    and is intended as a guidance, specific resin formulationsmust be evaluated in the intended application for the effectsof radiation and;

    Polymethylpentene

    FEP

    Polypropylene

    A t l

    (Natural)

    (4) Morphology

    (6) Dose Rate

    (3) Molecular Weight & Distribution,

    (5) Environment (Oxygen/Temperature

    REFERENCES:

    * Polymer Manufacturers Data

    1 - HDPELegend*

    2 - PBT3 - Aromatic4 - Rigid/Semi-Rigid PVC5 - ETFE (Tefzel) 6 - Hi-Impacy ABS7 - Butyl Rubber

    14

    15

    * NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratories, "Effects of Radiation on Polymers & Elastomers", 1988100 200 300 400 500

    www.doubleia.org

    Acetals

    PTFE* Ley, "The Effects of Irradiation on Packaging Materials", 1976

    Ageless Processing Technologies, KJH 12/96

    8 - Silicone/Neoprene9 - EPDM

    10 - Nylon 6 & 12

    12 - Cellulose/Paper13 - PMMA 14 - Varies by Mfgr/Grade 15 - Homopolymer

    11 - Amorphous Nylon

    * - Within each family is a range of radiation stabilities, the "steps" are intended to show significant family members

    * Kiang, "Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Elastomeric Closures, PDA, 1992

    * Skeins & Williams,"Ionizing Radiation Effect on Selected Biomedical Polymers"Dose (kGy)

    Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, AAMI TIR 17

  • 1. Material Compatibility Guidance

    C R ibl h lf lif ti tiC. Responsible shelf-life estimation

    Medical Device Accelerated Aging (AAMI TIR 17-1997; ASTM F1980-2007)

    Pharmaceutical Accelerated Stability (ICH G id li )(ICH Guidelines)

    www.doubleia.org

  • 1. Material Compatibility Guidance

    D ESR R di l t bilitD. ESR – Radical stability

    • Answers question: have free radical active species q pfrom the radiation sterilization process finished reacting?

    • Provides confidence going into aging studies that d d i idegradation rates are representative

    www.doubleia.org

  • ESR – Introduction

    • Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) 90

    100

    I)( )• Magnetic field

    scanned in a given i f

    60

    70

    80

    90

    cent

    ratio

    n (D PLA* - Typical free radical

    decay curve* t lli it i tlmicrowave frequency

    • Concentration of active species (free 20

    30

    40

    50

    e R

    adic

    al C

    on *crystallinity varies greatly

    ac ve spec es ( eeradicals) from radiation sterilization are measured

    0

    10

    20

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Free

    www.doubleia.org

    are measuredTime (hour)

  • ESR Free Radical Stability – PLATime 0

    1.0 hr

    2.0 hr

    4.0 hr6.0 hr

    10.0 hr

    www.doubleia.org

    Data on file at Abbott Vascular.

  • PLA - Radical Decay – 2nd Order

    Ti DI 1/DI 0 250Time DI 1/DI0.0 28.4 0.035

    0.5 21.4 0.0470.200

    0.250

    entra

    tion)

    1.0 15.9 0.063

    2.0 12.5 0.080

    3.0 9.6 0.104

    R2 = 0.9885

    0.100

    0.150

    ree

    radi

    cal C

    once

    4.0 9.1 0.110

    6.0 6.4 0.155

    10.0 4.8 0.2110.000

    0.050

    0 2 4 6 8 10

    1/(F

    r

    20.0 3.9 0.257

    98.0 4.4 0.229

    Time (hour)

    www.doubleia.org

    Data on file at Abbott Vascular.

  • 1. Material Compatibility Guidance

    E G E bE. Gamma vs E-beam

    • ISO 11137, Sterilization of health care products – Radiation,ISO 11137, Sterilization of health care products Radiation, groups gamma, e-beam and x-ray sterilization modalities

    • Gamma sterilization is approximately 90% of the market;

    www.doubleia.org

    pp y ;X-ray is a negligible fraction of the market

  • E-beam: Mechanism of Energy Deposition b Hi h E El tby High Energy Electrons

    e-≈ 60 eV

    • 0.5 – 10 MeV electrons are blasted into material

    • Energy is deposited through glancing ionic interactions≈ 60 eV is lost during each ionic interaction until the electron runs out of energy

    www.doubleia.org

    out of energy

  • Gamma: Mechanism of Energy Depositionb C 60by Co-60 gamma rays

    1 2• 1.25 MeV gamma rays are blasted into material

    Energ is deposited thro gh• Energy is deposited through Compton Scattering≈ 0.5 MeV recoil electrons …

    • Ionic interactions of high energy electrons are again the primary

    d f d i i

    www.doubleia.org

    mode of energy deposition

  • Gamma & E-beam - same mechanism of d itienergy deposition

    Differences between Gamma and E-beam• Penetration is different• Dose rate is different

    Material Compatibility• For many materials – material compatibility is equivalentFor many materials material compatibility is equivalent

    • For borderline materials, dose rate makes a difference:– Oxidative degradation: 4 hour process vs 4 second process

    Temperature: short spike in temperature during e beam vs

    www.doubleia.org

    – Temperature: short spike in temperature during e-beam vs long elevation of temperature during gamma

  • Agendage da

    1. Material Compatibility Guidancel G id2. Protocol Guidance

    3. Industry Guidance

    www.doubleia.org

  • 2. Protocol Guidance

    A Clinical StressesA. Clinical StressesCase Study # 1• PTFE is on the bottom of everyone’s list of radiationPTFE is on the bottom of everyone s list of radiation

    compatible materials• An e-beam sterilized PTFE coating on a stainless steel wire

    does not faildoes not fail… What are the clinically relevant stresses?

    Case Study # 2Case Study # 2• Polyamide / Polyether blends are relatively high on the list

    of radiation compatible materials• An e-beam sterilized polyester blend balloon catheter fails

    www.doubleia.org

    An e beam sterilized polyester blend balloon catheter fails because design requirements for wall thickness are severe.

  • B. Clinically relevant testing - basic mechanical and …micro and nano-scale characterization for controlled release ofpharmaceutical & biologic agents

    1. Drug distribution and coating thickness uniformity using imaging FTIR

    4. Thermal transition and analysis using μTA

    FTIR

    2. Surface (swelling) analysis using 5 Chemical component structure andSu ace (s e g) a a ys s us gAFM

    5. Chemical component, structure, and conformation usingLCR, ATR,FTIR, and NMR

    3. Microstructure and phase dispersion using AFM and LCR

    www.doubleia.org

  • 2. Protocol Guidance

    C Screen earlyC. Screen early• Dose ranging experiments (drug and delivery system)• Temperature and environment

    Look for clues relative to the fundamentals– E.g., Does drug degradation change in different matrices? This is a

    clue relative to primary vs secondary chemistry …p y y y

    – Note: rapid R&D sterilization allows for product iterations to be evaluated with the inclusion of the sterilization process

    www.doubleia.org

    p

  • 2. Protocol Guidance

    D Evaluate full range of parametersD. Evaluate full range of parameters

    P i t D• Primary parameter: Dose

    S d• Secondary parameters: – dose rate

    i t ( d t )– environment (oxygen and water)– temperature– additives

    www.doubleia.org

    additives

  • Experiments can optimize the application and processing range of a combination device drug

    1) Is secondary chemistry important? 2) Is the release polymer important?2) Is the release polymer important?3) Is oxygen or water important? 4) Is temperature important? ) p p

    www.doubleia.org

  • Effects of E-beam on Drug # 1

    20

    16

    18

    10

    12

    14

    Loss

    - TC

    EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY; n=3Linear (Drug only; 0-60 kGy)

    6

    8

    Dru

    g L Poly. (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY; n=3)

    0

    2

    4

    www.doubleia.org

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150

    Dose (kGy)

  • Effects of E-beam on Drug # 1

    20

    16

    18

    10

    12

    14

    rug

    Loss

    - TC EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY; n=3

    EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA; n=5+

    Poly ( EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY; n=3)

    6

    8

    Rel

    ativ

    e D Poly. ( EB Inert RT DRUG ONLY; n 3)

    Linear (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA;n=5+)

    0

    2

    4

    www.doubleia.org

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150

    Dose (kGy)

  • Effects of E-beam on Drug # 1

    20

    16

    18

    EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY

    10

    12

    14

    rug

    Loss

    - TC

    EB Inert RT DRUG ONLY

    EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA

    EB - Inert - Cold - Early data - DRUG in PLA

    Poly. (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY)

    6

    8

    Rel

    ativ

    e D Poly. (EB Inert RT DRUG ONLY)

    Linear (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA)

    Linear (EB - Inert - Cold - Early data - DRUG inPLA)

    0

    2

    4

    www.doubleia.org

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150

    Dose (kGy)

  • Effects of E-beam on Drug # 1

    20

    16

    18

    EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY

    EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA

    10

    12

    14

    rug

    Loss

    - TC

    EB Inert RT DRUG in PLGA

    EB - Inert - cold - Early data - DRUG in PLA

    EB - Inert - cold - Early data - DRUG in FLUOROPOLYMER

    Poly (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY)

    6

    8

    Rel

    ativ

    e D Poly. (EB Inert RT DRUG ONLY)

    Linear (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA)

    Linear ( EB - Inert - cold - Early data - DRUG in PLA)

    Linear ( EB - Inert - cold - Early data - DRUG in

    0

    2

    4Linear ( EB Inert cold Early data DRUG inFLUOROPOLYMER)

    www.doubleia.org

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150

    Dose (kGy)

  • Effects of E-beam on Drug # 1

    35

    25

    30 EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY; n=3

    EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA

    20

    25

    rug

    Loss

    - TC EB - Inert - Cold - DRUG IN PLA

    EB - Inert - Cold - DRUG in FLUOROPOLYMER

    EB - AIR - RT - DRUG in FLUOROPOLYMER

    10

    15

    Rel

    ativ

    e D

    Poly. (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG ONLY; n=3)

    Linear (EB - Inert - RT - DRUG in PLGA)

    Linear (EB - Inert - Cold - DRUG IN PLA)

    0

    5Linear (EB - Inert - Cold - DRUG inFLUOROPOLYMER)

    www.doubleia.org

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150

    Dose (kGy)

  • Agendage da

    1. Material Compatibility Guidancel G id2. Protocol Guidance

    3. Industry Guidance

    www.doubleia.org

  • 3. Industry Guidance

    A AAMI TIR 17 1997 to TIR17 2008A. AAMI TIR 17-1997 to TIR17-2008

    From sterilization of polymeric materials used in medical devices with radiation sterilization …

    to six sterilization modalities:

    – Radiation – Dry heatRadiation– EO– Steam

    Dry heat– Hydrogen peroxide– Ozone

    www.doubleia.org

  • 3. Industry Guidance

    B From TIR17 2008 to ???B. From TIR17-2008 to … ???

    From six sterilization modalities with a focus on polymeric materials in medical devices …to pharmaceuticals and biologics?p g

    www.doubleia.org

  • Agendage da

    1. Material Compatibility Guidancel G id2. Protocol Guidance

    3. Industry Guidance

    Questions?

    www.doubleia.org