practical education chapter 4 regulations and academic standards testimony before pennsylvania state...

24
Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and Business Owners in the Norwin School District

Upload: haylie-teesdale

Post on 31-Mar-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Practical Education

Chapter 4 Regulations

and

Academic Standards

Testimony

before

Pennsylvania State Board of Education

February 24, 1998

by

Parents and Business Owners in the Norwin School District

Page 2: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Practical Education and Academic Standards

• What is a “Practical Education”?

• Do Academic Standards provide this direction?

• Does the Chapter 4 regulation address core academics?

• Can they be measured?

• Who are the consumers of the educational product?

Page 3: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Practical Education

Practical Education proponents believe that there exists a core body of academics, represented by nationalized testing, such as SAT and the Iowa Basic tests, a set of clearly defined and measurable knowledge and skills. This would include reading and writing instruction based on a phonetic intensive program; practical mathematics; Western Literature, as a means to both inspire and instruct; practical and exact sciences, unencumbered by popular politics or the most recent of contrivance of social engineers.

Page 4: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

What We Were

Lead to Believe

Pittsburgh Post Gazette, June 17, 1997

Page 5: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

New Standards

will replace Chapter 5

Or will they?

Page 6: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

What Chapter 4 is really doing

Page 7: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Chapter 5 versus Chapter 4• Reading & Writing

• Mathematics

• Science & Technology

• Environment & Ecology

• Social Studies

• Arts & Humanities

• Career Education & Work

• Wellness & Fitness

• Family & Consumer Sciences

• World Languages

• Communications

• Mathematics

• Science & Technology

• Environment & Ecology

• Citizenship

• Arts & Humanities

• Career Education & Work

• Wellness & Fitness

• Home Economics

Page 8: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Why the need for change

• Pennsylvania ranked 45th on SAT’s *

• No early intervention for reading and math problems

• Inability to test standards in non-core areas

• Limiting local control of the education

• Accountability

*American Legislative Exchange council, Report Card on American Education 1994, pp 12-13.

Page 9: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

SAT Scores• Verbal

• Math

Page 10: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Reading and Math

Problems

Is this early intervention?

Page 11: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

The Purpose of Public

Education

(6) Honesty, responsibility and tolerance. Public schools should convey to students the need for honesty, integrity, individual responsibility and tolerance. Chapter 5 Regulation

Our elementary program enrolls students in kindergarten through fifth grade. This program concerns itself with character development, attitudes, knowledge, fundamental skills and health habits that make a well-integrated, useful youngster. Norwin School District

Page 12: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

What Educators are being taught

Text book from California University

of PA’s Education Department

Page 13: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

The struggle over Standards

Academic

Standards

Developmentalism

Humanism

Social

Meliorism

Social

Efficiency

Page 14: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Social Efficiency

“The social-efficiency curriculum has the greatest influence in America schools. Backed by those who want the schools primarily to serve the needs of the economy, it is designed to prepare students for the work force. Often, social efficiency curricula emphasizes vocational subjects and is associated with the educational goals of human capital…”

School to Work?

Spring, Joel. “American Education”,eighth edition(1998), pp. 240-241

Page 15: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Humanism

“...the humanist wants the curriculum to introduce students to the cultural traditions of society. A humanist spurns the idea of a vocational curriculum and favors the development of general intellectual skills. Often the humanist wants the curriculum to be organized around standard academics subjects like literature, history, foreign languages, the arts,and science.”

Spring, Joel. “American Education”,eighth edition(1998), pp. 240-241

Page 16: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Social Meliorism

“The social meliorist wants the curriculum to cause social improvement and change. Social meliorism reflects the reform element in American education. At the most extreme, the social meliorist will ask for courses to solve each new social problem. Sometimes this means the education of students to cause general political and economic changes.”

Spring, Joel. “American Education”,eighth edition(1998), pp. 240-241

Page 17: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Developmentalism

“...developmentalism is the most radical of the fourcurriculum types. The developmentalist wants the curriculum organized around the psychological development of the child. This means a curriculum focused on the needs of the individual child as opposed to the focus of social-efficiency educators, humanists, and social meliorists, respectively, on economic needs, the passing on of culture, and social reform.”

Spring, Joel. “American Education”,eighth edition(1998), pp. 240-241

Page 18: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

The struggle over Standards

Academic

Standards

Developmentalism

Humanism

Social

Meliorism

Social

Efficiency

Parents

Students

Employers

Educational

Consumer

Page 19: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Norwin’s Science

(vii) All students evaluate advantages, disadvantages, and ethical implications associated with the impact of science and technology on current and future

life.Chapter 5 Outcome

“Social Meliorism”

Page 20: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Norwin’s Math

Do Standards

remove this from the

classroom?

“Developmentalism”

Page 21: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Norwin’s English

“Developmentalism”

Page 22: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Norwin’sCareer Days

Partner’s

in

Progress

“Social Efficiency”

Page 23: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

Practical Education

Practical Education proponents believe that there exists a core body of academics, represented by nationalized testing, such as SAT and the Iowa Basic tests, a set of clearly defined and measurable knowledge and skills. This would include reading and writing instruction based on a phonetic intensive program; practical mathematics; Western Literature, as a means to both inspire and instruct; practical and exact sciences, unencumbered by popular politics or the most recent of contrivance of social engineers.

Page 24: Practical Education Chapter 4 Regulations and Academic Standards Testimony before Pennsylvania State Board of Education February 24, 1998 by Parents and

State Educational Direction

• Stick with the basics and only the basics

• Intervention at any early age (not grade 4)

• More local control

• Test only measurable standards

• Everyone accountable