powerpoint

24
Lawrence M. Hinman, Ph.D. Director, The Values Institute iversity of San Diego RoboEthics: RoboEthics: Ethical Issues Ethical Issues in Autonomous Systems in Autonomous Systems Honors 318: Computer Ethics Honors 318: Computer Ethics November 14, 2006 November 14, 2006

Upload: peterbuck

Post on 28-May-2015

470 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PowerPoint

Lawrence M. Hinman, Ph.D.Director, The Values InstituteUniversity of San Diego

RoboEthics:RoboEthics:Ethical Issues Ethical Issues

in Autonomous Systemsin Autonomous Systems

Honors 318: Computer EthicsHonors 318: Computer EthicsNovember 14, 2006November 14, 2006

Page 2: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 2

Preface:My Interest in the Topic

I first became really interested in robot ethics when I saw a soccer game at the Neurosciences Institute involving robots.

Although I felt that even I could beat one of the robots in a soccer game, I realized that they would only get better and I would only get worse.

I felt I had seen the future. Video

http://www.nsi.edu/nomad/segway/

Page 3: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 3

Overview

What is a robot? Why is RoboEthics important? What ethical guidelines should

govern the behavior of robots?

Page 4: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 4

Robot:The Origins of the Word

The word "robot" first appeared in Karel Čapek's science fiction play “R.U.R.” (Rossum's Universal Robots) in 1921, first produced in New York in 1922.

It quickly replaced other words, such as “android.”

Page 5: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 5

Robots as Autonomous Agents

Our definition of “robot” is in part stipulative, i.e., we can decide precisely what it means.

For the purposes of this presentation, the essential characteristic of robots will be that they are autonomous agents, i.e., they make decisions on their own based on a combination of programming and current input.

They do not need to look like human beings. They are not remote-controlled machines, for

such machines lack the key characteristic of making their own decisions.

Page 6: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 6

Robots

Repliee Q1expo and Hiroshi Ishiguro, Director of Osaka University's Intelligent Robotics Laboratory.

"Appearance is very important to have better interpersonal relationships with a robot,"

-- Hiroshi Ishiguro

Page 7: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 7

Repliee Q1expo

Ayako Fujii poses with her android clone

Will robots soon be caring for the elderly?

Page 8: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 8

Help at Home

“Someday, robots could replace humans as nurse's aides, but first they will need a little sensitivity training. Japan's Ri-Man is headed in the right direction. With sensors that enable it to see, smell and hear its environment, it also has some 320 pressure points on its arms and chest that allow it to sense the exact position of whatever it's holding. The bot can lift 80 lbs. today, but researchers hope to strengthen the motors in Ri-Man's arms without increasing their size, so they still resemble those of a man, not a monster. “Time, November 13, 2006Inventor: Bio-mimetric Control Research Center at the Institute of Physical and Chemical ResearchAvailability: Not for saleTo learn more visit www.bmc.riken.jp/~RI-MAN/index_us.html

Page 9: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 9

Hubo at NextFest

Page 10: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 10

RoboCup:Robots Play Soccer

Page 11: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 11

Military Robots

Search and HAZMAT handling

Page 12: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 12

Military Robots: BEAR“The Battlefield Extraction-Assist

Robot (BEAR), developed for military search-and-rescue

missions, has hydraulic arms that can support injured soldiers

weighing up to 400 lbs. (more than most troopers in full gear) and a

system of wheels, tracks and joints that enable it to maneuver in

all sorts of positions. It can balance on its back wheels to

climb up a steep hill or roll over rough terrain while staying low to

the ground. For now the BEAR needs a human to drive it via

remote control, but a more autonomous version is in the

works.”--Time, Nov. 13, 2006

Inventor: Vecna Technologies

Availability: Field-ready by 2010

To learn more visit – vecna.com/robotics

Page 13: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 13

Talon

TALON is a powerful, lightweight, versatile robot designed for missions ranging from reconnaissance to weapons delivery.

Page 14: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 14

Robotic Combat Planes

X-45 Robotic Combat Plane Makes Dramatic Debut - The Boeing Co.'s X-45, the first robotic plane designed specifically to fly combat missions, has successfully made its maiden flight.

Page 15: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 15

The Predator

The Predator is still remote controlled rather than autonomous, but now can carry weapon systems as well as perform recon.

Page 16: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 16

The Future of Responsibility

When robots make decisions, who is responsible if they cause harm?

Page 17: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 17

Deontological Approaches

Are there any categorical imperatives governing the behavior of robots?

The most well-known attempt at a set of such imperatives was Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics.

Page 18: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 18

Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"

“A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

“A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

“A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.”

Page 19: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 19

Gert’s Moral RulesThe Ten Rules 1. Don't Kill 2. Don't Cause Pain 3. Don't Disable 4. Don't Deprive Of Freedom 5. Don't Deprive Of Pleasure 6. Don't Deceive 7. Keep Your Promise 8. Don't Cheat 9. Obey The Law 10. Do Your Duty

How many of these rules would be observed in robotic weapons systems?

Bernard Gert, The Moral Rules

Page 20: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 20

Questions for Deontological Approaches to Robotic Ethics

How do robots decide what is the appropriate description of an act?– For example: murdering a person,

killing a person, pulling the trigger of a gun, exerting pressure on a metal protrusion

If there are many rules, how do robots deal with conflicting rules?

Page 21: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 21

Consequentialist RoboEthics

Consequentialist ethics in general maintains that the consequences of an action determine whether that action was good or bad.

Thus a consequentialist robot would be one whose actions are determined by weighing consequences.

Page 22: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 22

Consequences for whom?

Egoist: consequences only for me Altruist: consequences only for

others Utilitarian: consequences for

everyone equally Group consequentialist:

consequences for my group (nation, family, fellow believers, etc.)

Page 23: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 23

The Epistemology of Consequences

As James Gips argues in “The Ethical Robot,” judging consequences requires a daunting set of cognitive skills:

“A way of describing the situation in the world;

“A way of generating possible actions;

“A means of predicting the situation that would result if the action were taken;

“A method of evaluating a situation in terms of its goodness or desirability.”

Page 24: PowerPoint

04/12/23 ©Lawrence M. Hinman 24

Conclusion

Few answers, many questions: Autonomous robotic systems will be increasingly

common What ethical rules should govern their behavior? Are they sufficiently sophisticated to interpret

such rules properly? As the possible harm caused by robotic systems

increases, especially with robotic weapons systems, what limits should be placed on the autonomy of such systems? On their behavior?