powering up minds and powering up machines: guided inquiry, reading, and web 2.0 dr ross j todd...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Powering Up Minds and Powering Up Machines: Guided Inquiry, Reading, and
Web 2.0
Dr Ross J Todd & Dr Carol A GordonCenter for International Scholarship in School Libraries
Rutgers, The State University of New Jerseycissl.scils.rutgers.edu [email protected]
[email protected]/RossJTodd
Today’s Agenda
9.00 am Welcome
Review of Guided Inquiry & framework for instructional interventions: Guided Inquiry and Web 2.0 Instructional interventions
10.30 am: Morning Tea
11.00 am: The role of reading in Guided Inquiry: building engagement and Understanding
12.30 pm: Lunch
1.15 pm: Putting Guided Inquiry into Practice: Planning GI units
3.30 pm Seminar ends
Dhinawan: Learning as a Beautiful Thing
Never neglect our children
Our country is the children that we work with
Recognize their footprints – intervene early
Help them become the strong tree that can sway in the wind
The warrior within –strength, building the future, we look after our family
Listen to the beat of their drums; tap into the rhythm of their lives
Think Outside the Box
3 8
What is a School Library?
The school library is the school’s physical and virtual learning
commons where inquiry, thinking, imagination, discovery, and creativity are central to students’ information-to-knowledge journey, and to their
personal, social and cultural growth.
What is GuidedInquiry?
A framework for quality teaching and learning through the school library
An inquiry approach to learning is one where students actively engage with diverse and often conflicting sources of information and ideas to discover new ones, to build new understandings, and to develop personal viewpoints and perspectives.
Carefully planned, closely supervised, targeted intervention(s) of an instructional team of teacher- librarians and teachers to guide students through curriculum based inquiry units through the school library that gradually lead towards deep knowledge and understanding.
Guided Inquiry
KNOWLEDGE-BASED OUTCOMESDeep Knowledge
Deep UnderstandingProblematic Knowledge
Higher-order thinkingHigh ExpectationsStudent Direction
--------------------------------------------------------------
It is underpinned by stimulating encounters with information – encounters which capture their interest and attention, and
which motivate and direct their ongoing inquiry.
INFORMATION FOUDATION
Central Dimensions of Guided Inquiry
As a framework for teaching and learning through the school library, it goes beyond simplistic, generic lists of information skills or information processes
Founded on research that has modeled the information-to-knowledge experience of learners: Kuhlthau – Information Search Process
The information-to-knowledge experience encompasses cognitions, behaviours, and feelings
Focus on knowledge-based outcomes; constructivist
Transformational rather than informational role of the school library
Goals of GuidedInquiry
Learners actively searching for meaning and understanding learners constructing knowledge rather than passively receiving itlearners directly involved and engaged in the discovery of new knowledgelearners encountering alternative perspectives and conflicting ideas learners transferring new knowledge and skills to new circumstanceslearners taking ownership and responsibility for mastery of curriculum content and skills
CONSTRUCTIVIST VIEW OF LEARNING
www.wordle.net
sfnmsfoetfjewoendsvondOGJweogjVjsdsgogosovmqfq0osddsdodGOALS OF EDUCATION
The Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young
Australians
Library PolicyTagcloud
Tasks Initiation Selection Exploration Formulation Collection Presentation Evaluation----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------→Feelings uncertainly optimism confusion clarity sense of satisfaction or(affective) frustration direction/ disappointment
doubt confidence
Thoughts vague-------------------------------------→focused(cognitive) -----------------------------------------------→
increased interest
Actions seeking relevant information----------------------------→seeking pertinent information(physical) exploring documenting
Information-to-Knowledge Journey
Zone of Intervention: the critical point / need for instruction
VELS andGuided Inquiry
Intellectual Agency
Personal Agency
Technical Agency
Social Agency
The IT Imperative for Guided Inquiry?
2nd generation of web-basedenvironments
Diverse mix of technologies movingbeyond static web pages that provideinformation
Seek to facilitate community, communication, collaboration and creativity between users.
Functional space: comprises social network sites, blogs and online diaries, wikis, podcasts, videoblogs, content creation mechanisms
Extensive engagement with microcontent: “posts” and “discussion threads”, streams of conversation, and moving content (eg podcasts shuffled between websites)
Shift in focus from finding locating and evaluating information to one of using information, creating knowledge and sharing of ideas.
The Web 2.0 Environment
Web 2.0 asCommunity
My Concerns and Challenges
Need to move beyond:
- technology of creating spaces - dumping and transmission of content- superficiality of engagement: transportation rather than transformation of text- limited critical thinking & creativity
To the intellectual input of those spaces
provide intellectual, social and technical tools across these multiple environments to foster creativity, knowledge creation and production, both individual and collaborative, and to foster the intellectual, social and cultural growth of our young people
6 Key Competencies in all learning areas that draw on knowledge, attitudes, and values in ways that lead to action:
1. Thinking: using creative, critical, and metacognitive processes to make sense of information, experiences, and ideas; developing understanding, making decisions, shaping actions, constructing knowledge. Intellectual curiosity is at the heart of this competency.
2. Using language, symbols, and texts: working with and making meaning of the codes in which knowledge is expressed - written, oral/aural, and visual; informative and imaginative; informal and formal; mathematical, scientific, and technological.
Key Competencies in the Wired G.I. World
3. Relating to others: interacting effectively with others, listening actively, recognising different points of view, negotiating, and sharing ideas
4. Participating and contributing: being actively involved in communities; contributing appropriately as group members
5. Technical mastery of the information and knowledge building and sharing tools
6. Managing self: self-motivation, a “can-do” attitude, students seeing themselves as capable learners; personal safety and protection – ethical aspects
Using Web 2.0SIX Key Competencies
Ethical Issues
Technical vs intellectual solutions
How to respond to inappropriate content
How to deal with inappropriate content: where, how and who of getting help
How to react to inappropriate sites
How to manage problematic conversations
Self-protection in the wired world
What is appropriate and inappropriate to publish and share online
Guidelines for Web 2.0 tools selection
Does it promote critical thinking?
Does it support ISP stages
Does it provide Guided Inquiry through intervention and help
Principles for IntegratingWeb 2.0 tools into Learning
builds student centred learning communities - communities of learners and communities that are ever learning is a place where innovation and diversity flourish views teaching as a relational process is where students construct new knowledge through learning and collaboration (using web 2.0 tools) sees teachers become learners emphasises responsiblility for own learning creates authentic learning opportunities that are interdisciplinary and integrated operates transparently
Directory of Technology Tools
http://c4lpt.co.uk/Directory/Centre for Learning & Performance Technologies
22 categories of tools
All tools 3,009
Free Tools 2,282
1 Web browsers, players and readers
2 Social bookmarking tools
3 Blogging tools
4 RSS/Feed tools
5 Micro-blogging tools
6 Email tools
7 Instant messaging and chat tools
8 Productivity tools (personal and group)
9 Mind mapping tools
10 Presentation tools
11 Presentation sharing tools
12 Documentation and office suites
13 Live conferencing, broadcasting and virtual world tools
14 Instructional tools
15 Screen capture and screencasting tools
16 Polling and survey tools
17 Web authoring tools
18 Wiki tools
19 Image/photo tools
20 Audio, podcasting and iPod/iPhone tools
21 Video tools
22 Personal dashboards
23 Course management systems
24 Social networking tools
25 Integrated social media and collaboration tools and platforms
http://content.yudu.com/Library/A18dcc/TwelveEssentialsforT/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yudu.com%2Fitem%2Fdetails%2F59772%2FTwelve-Essentials-for-Technology-Integration
12 Essentials for Technology Integration
Document and Presentation Creation ToolsGoogle Docs – collaborative document creationZOHO Show – document, spreadsheet, quiz/survey creation toolsAnimoto – simple video slide show creation
Tools for Communicating with Parents and StudentsEdublogs –free blogging platformsDrop.io – file sharing, podcasting, conferencingWeebly – creating free classroom website
Tools for creating collaborative student projectsWikispaces –collaborative document spacesVoicethread – online commentary with voice / conversationsEdiscio – collaborative flashcards
Educational Alternatives to UTubeSnag Films – free documentariesSchoolTube TeacherTube – share videosDotSub – resource for ELL students
Web 2.0 Tools
Blogging: logs / journals/ diaries on the internet; chronological, single authorship; multiple forms, with plug-ins (widgets) for mixing of content, links
Wikis: collaborative, editable writing spaces: collective knowledge
Podcasting: distributing compressed audio across internet; screencasting, videocasting
RSS: Real Simple Syndication / Rich Site Summary: feed of content collected and organized through aggregators
Social Networking; Social Bookmarking
Online photo galleries: publishing, creating, using images online
Blogging
Logs / journals/ diaries on the internet; chronological, single authorship; multiple forms, with plug-ins (widgets) for mixing of content, links
Each individual posting has a stable address (“permalink”) allowing reference; “ping-back” mechanism allowing authors to know when other blogs have cited their posts
175,000 blogs created daily (CEO Technocrati) (search engine for blogosphere)
Why blog – express personal beliefs
Blogs:Active Writing Spaces
What constitutes a sustained response? Whose voice is being heard?
- Expository response: provision of information; requires clarity and strong organization of ideas; Authenticity and accuracy of facts; source of factsExplanatory response: focus is on explanation: how and why
- Critical response: addressing postings with argument / evidence analysis; Presents your own point of view – supported by relevant facts, drawn from sources, and presented in a logical manner.
- Analytical response: comparison, analysis, identifying patterns, trends, themes, issues, associations across postings
- Synthetical response: Developing conclusions, establishing personal viewpoints and perspectives, generating position statements from multiple postings; combining ideas in fresh ways to present new insights
- Reflective Response: my learnings; identifying implications
Synthetical / ConclusiveResponse
I predict that …
My informed guess is that …
As a result, I suspect that …
I believe that this means that ….
I conclude that …
Because this happened, it is possible that …
It makes sense that ….
It doesn’t make sense that …..
ReflectiveResponse
What have I learned about this class activity?
What are my most important ideas?
What conclusions can I draw based on my understanding
What are implications, consequences of what I have learned?
What other questions come to mind that I could investigate?
What do I wish I had done differently?
What were some of the difficulties I encountered doing this task?
DIAGNOSTIC; REDESIGN OF LEARNING TASKS, SKILLS DEVELOPMENT
Reflections on Personal Learning (VELS)
Key questions
How do I prefer to learn?
What is important?
What’s working for me?
What didn’t work?
What critical incidents occurred?
What do I need to do to finish this task?
How successful was I?
What can I do to improve my learning and/or performance?
Personal Reflection
What worked well? What pleased me? How do I know that it was successful? Who can/did I share my success with? What did I do that helped me to: - prepare for the task - create new ideas - practise new skills - improve existing skills - modify my learning habits - find relevant information or materials - organise information or materials - correctly summarise information - understand unfamiliar ideas - take relevant notes - use my existing knowledge or skills - represent information in meaningful ways? What could I do differently next time? What factors influenced my ability to learn? What might help me learn more about this?
BLOGSPotential Uses
• Building background knowledge: expository and explanatory responses eg present 5 new facts I have learned;
• Focus-Formulation: Questioning response: developing the deep questions through interrogation of posting(s) What questions spring to mind as you read this
• Collection: Authentic research tool: data collection -> analysis and synthesis of ideas
• Reflective response to instructional program
• Class portal for communication
• Online filing cabinets
• E-Portfolios
WikisCollaborative, editable spaces: collective knowledge (eg Wikipedia: eg Tsunami 2004 – 9hrs for first 76 word story; 48 hours later, 6,500 words and edited 1,200 times; wikihow.com; wikitravel.com)
Open, contributory, living documents; people work together to generate and maintain a document
Social construction of knowledge; negotiation of meaning: group’s best effort, not an individual; community watchdog, soft security
Working as a team / group / community in a shared information space: giving students control of knowledge construction and editorial control – responsibility and ownership
Scaffolds for Working in a Wiki: What does it take?
Constructing the sustained response + creative + publishing competencies
How teams work together in safety and security
Dealing with team issues, conflict eg someone edits without justification / explanation; arguments
Negotiation skills: negotiating to agree on correctness, meaning, relevance
Team management / project management: planning, timelines, role assignment, delegation
Communication eg explaining intentions behind edits
Document management / versions
Wiki Opportunities
Brainstorming: TOPIC – what, when where, why etc
Building background knowledge of a curriculum topic eg Content Jigsaw
Collective notebook / collective study guide
Metalanguage: glossaries of key words
Construct a picture of prior knowledge – identify pockets of expertise and knowledge gaps; misconceptions, inaccuracies
Collaborative resource lists
Peer assessment / formative assessment
Knowledge creation, drafting, review, feedback
Teachers’ wiki: co-constructed curriculum – lesson plans, instructional exemplars, assessment rubrics
Who are the early Jazz greats
What is Jazz?
How is Jazz different to my favourite music
When did jazz begin
Jazz jargon
How is Jazz similar to my favourite music
Why is Jazz an important music form
What are important characteristics of Jazz
Main Jazz instruments
Jazz music / musicians I recognize /video clips /podcasts I like
My feelings about Jazz
What next? Questions I want to explore, and why
What to do with Wikipedia
Students use W. to brainstorm ideas, build background knowledge – you will not stop it! - highlight pockets of knowledge / gaps
Take group through a key Wikipedia article on a topic related to class work, pointing out its strengths and weaknesses, and inviting the class to edit it
Students use other sources to determine accuracy of the facts in a Wikipedia article:Assign groups of students to evaluate Wikipedia entries, using research from other sources as an evaluative tool; compare and contrast; deal with conflicting ideas
The class takes on creating specific Wikipedia articles related to class work: Class creates, expands and updates the articles. A collection of “teacher approved” articles can be produced in many subjects, making Wikipedia better as time goes on.
Watch what happens: modification, spammed, and how to deal with this
Wikis and Formative Assessment
Use of wikis to post and share research task plans, focus the knowledge building task, develop the focus question(s) and formulate personal knowledge outcomes, develop real world justifications for research choices
Use of wikis for classroom teacher & teacher-librarian feedback on research plan, resources
Creating the knowledge product – drafts: Use of collaborative PQP: student peer review involving PRAISE, QUESTIONS, POLISH; students apply assessment rubric at draft stage, and develop class understanding of assessment criteria
RSS: Real Simple Syndication
Following topical themes as presented in various news services, websites, blogs, newsfeeds, website updates, discussion forums
Personalized collection of content through aggregator
Keep up to date
Key Issue: from collection to transformation of ideas
Credibility, accuracy, bias/perspectiveDeveloping analysis, synthesis, skeptical mind
RSSDealing with Conflicting Knowledge
RSS1 RSS2 RSS3 RSS4 RSS5
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Q 4 …n
Patterns
Similarities
Differences
Conclusion
Which do I believe / accept? Why?
RSSDealing with Conflicting Knowledge
RSS1 RSS2 RSS3 RSS4 RSS5
Source
Source Ch’istics
Accuracy of facts
“Take” / Bias
Response
Audience
Images
Tenor
Conclusion
Podcasts
Guest speakersHomework assignmentsMessagesInstructional processes eg. Details of science experimentStudent weekly broadcasts of learning; reflections on learningAudio toursBook talksRecordings for special needs studentsRadio broadcasts, commercials, radio plays …
Tag Clouds
SocialTagging
Eg Use Flickr and gallery of photographs to teach “searching by subject” eg at topic selection stage
No tags ascribed to photographs
Instruct students to tag photos “for retrieval by others”
Discussion: are the tags the same?; are they accurate? Do they actually describe the object? Are the tags meaningful? Are they correctly spelled? Do they make the photos more retrievable? The problem of “insider language”?
Maximize available tools eg:
wordle.net
worksift.com
wallwisher: http://wallwisher.com/
google.com - Wonder Wheel
google.com/squared
Bush Rangers of AustraliaGoogle Wonder Wheel
Bush Rangers of AustraliaGoogle Time Line
Google.com/squared
Google.com/squared
Content Management Systems
Access through content management systems:
Moodle (Modular Object Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment) Blackboard / WebCT; eCollege, Janison
Build in all technology tools – modular elements – blogs, wikis, discussion forums, chats, whiteboard, plug-ins- Voki – animated avatar (http://www.voki.com/)- ToonDoo – cartoon strip creator (http://www.toondoo.com)- Survey Monkey – online surveys (www.surveymonkey.com)- Bubbl.us – concept mapping / brainstorming software http://www.bubbl.us/- VoiceThread – online media and commenting environment http://voicethread.com/about/- RubricMachine – create rubrics (at the Landmarks for Schools website: http://landmark-project.com/rubric_builder/index.php- Citation Machine - http://citationmachine.net/?resize=1- Audacity – software for assisting in creation of podcasts http://audacity.sourceforge.net/- Skype: Internet telephony
Björk “New Worlds” in “Selmasongs” album
“If living is seeing
I’m holding my breath
In wonder – I wonder
What happens next?
A new world, a new day to see”