powder technology from landslides and avalanches to concrete … · 2018. 6. 21. · *u. aschauer,...

41
1 LTP ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE Powder Technology From Landslides and Avalanches to Concrete and Chocolate Prof. P. Bowen (EPFL), Dr. P. Derlet (PSI) WEEK 13 Sintering Mechanisms & New Technologies- (3) Processing Forming - Shaping

Upload: others

Post on 07-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    LTPÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE

    Powder Technology

    From Landslides and Avalanches to Concrete

    and Chocolate

    Prof. P. Bowen (EPFL), Dr. P. Derlet (PSI)

    WEEK 13

    Sintering Mechanisms & New Technologies- (3)

    Processing – Forming - Shaping

  • Teaching plan 2017

    Files of lectures and notes to be found on LTP website : http://ltp.epfl.ch/Teaching

    Week-DATE File.

    no.

    Powder Technology – Wednesday 10.15-12.00 – MXG 110

    1- sept 20 1 Introduction - PB

    2 – sept 27 2 Powder packing and compaction - 1- PB -

    3 – oct 4 3 Powder packing and compaction - 2-PB- and guest lecturer - MS

    4 – oct 11 4 Powder packing and compaction -3- PD

    5 – oct 18 4 Powder packing and compaction - 4 – PD

    6 – oct 25 5 Particle – Particle Interactions 1 - PB

    7 – nov1 6 Particle – Particle Interactions 2- PB

    8 – nov 8 7 Particle – Particle Interactions - 3-PB

    9 – nov -15 8 Introduction to atomistic scale simulations PD

    10 – nov 22 9 Compaction, Sintering & Defects in metals at atomistic scale - PD

    11 -nov-29 11 Sintering Mechanisms (& New Technologies) - 1 – PD

    12 - dec 6 11 Sintering Mechanisms (& New Technologies) - 2 – PD

    13 – dec 13 10 New Technologies (& Sintering Mechanisms) -3 PB

    14 – dec 20 12 New Technologies (& Sintering Mechanisms) and exam 4 – PB

    PB – Prof. Paul Bowen (EPFL), PD – Dr. Peter Derlet (PSI)

    MS- Dr. Mark Sawley (EPFL)

  • Today’s Objectives

    This Week

    • Standard forming methods…..ceramics and metals

    – Dry Pressing…(Generalities from 3rd year & summary PT compaction

    courses – weeks 4&5 file PowderTech 4)

    – Wet methods – overview - slip casting, tape casting, injection moulding

    – Limitations …additive manufacturing approach

    – General intro to additive manufacturing…video…importance of dispersion!!!

    – Green bodies…Sintering…standard procedures (next week)…

    • Additive manufacturing and sintering combined – SLS

    – Introduction…..Video…..

    – Detailed study thesis Cedric André importance of particle packing …..

    Next week …

    • Summary of standard sintering methods and procedures

    • New sintering processes, SPS, flash sintering, cold sintering…

    • Typical questions, Powder Technology – Learning outcomes,

    • Exam….

    4

  • Standard forming methods – Dry pressing ceramics

    • Dry pressing – Compaction – Ceramics (3rd year* p.209 & TP2)

    • Ceramics – powders granulated (PT week 3 – Neural network –

    particle packing) with

    • Binder (e.g. polyvinyl alcohol PVA) and

    • Plasticizer (e.g. polyethylene glycol PEG [-CH2-CH2-O-]n)

    • 3- stages of compaction

    – i) rearrangement →RCP of granules

    – ii) deformation → plastic…PEG/PVA

    – iii) granule fracture/densification

    – Ceramic particle density ~ 60% →RCP

    • Limitations L/D – density gradients - friction

    4

    *Les Traité des Matér, Vol. 16 « Les Céramiques » J. Barton, P. Bowen, C. Carry & J.M. Haussonne, PPUR, 2005

    Grey – C, Red – O, White- H

    PVA

  • Standard forming methods – Compaction metals

    • Dry pressing – Compaction – Metals (PT weeks 4&5) – higher plasticity cf

    ceramics…also 3 stages …

    – Stage 0 – packing…. rearrangement → RCP ….

    – Stage 1 – deformation – increase in contact area -connected pores (60%-80%)

    – Stage 2 – sealing off of pores between particles (80%-90%) - porous solid

    • Density variations as L/D increases…lubrication walls vs powder

    • Four major mechanisms controlling densification are

    – rearrangement, plastic deformation, power-law creep and diffusional flow

    5

    DEM modellingDrucker-Prager-Cap

    (DPC) model

  • Limitations – compaction

    • Generally shapes have to be symetrical and simple in 2D i.e.

    small orthogonal features not possible

    • Ceramics limited in size…few cm..

    • Length to diamter ratio…> 2 start getting density gradients

    • Ceramics max force 150-200 MPa – otherwise elastic rebound

    leading to defects..

    • For cylinders and tubes – isostatic pressing (10’s cm)

    • Metals …work hardening can limit compact density

    • Sizes higher – cars 9-25 kg compacted & sintered steel parts..

    • 10’s cm ..but again… too big get density gradients

    • E.g. http://www.perrytool.com/ precision gears, pulleys, bearings,

    • cams, sprockets, fasteners, soft magnetic components and

    • complex multi-level, close tolerance mechanical parts

    6

    3cm

    2cm

    http://www.perrytool.com/products_gears.shtmlhttp://www.perrytool.com/products_pulleys.shtmlhttp://www.perrytool.com/products_bearings.shtmlhttp://www.perrytool.com/products_magnetics.shtmlhttp://www.perrytool.com/products_mechanical.shtml

  • 7

    Wet Ceramic Slip Casting technique

    Suspension forming method

    Prepare suspension – called slip

    Slip = concentrated suspension

    Need adequate viscosity to pour into

    the mould

    Want a minimum of liquid

    Give us a minimum shrinkage during

    drying

    Porous mould – cappilary suction Pc

    Deposit thickness α t 0.5

    Can also use to make films – tape

    casting - 10-250 mm thickness

    Suspension

    Filter 0.2 mm

    Mould - Silicone

    Porous Support

    rP lvc

    cos2

  • 8

    Slip casting – cups or solid forms

    empty mouldfilled with suspension

    drained of excess suspension

    taken from mould for drying

    empty mould filled with suspension

    pressure or slurry suppliment

    final green solid form - for drying

    drain casting

    – par vidange

    solid casting

    - forme remplit

  • 9

    Application Traditional Ceramics

    Porcelaine – hand basin, toilets

    Complex shape and big!!!

    Slip casting 45% vol solids - 80 minutes per

    mould

    Pressure casting – add gas pressure

    2 minutes!! 40 times quicker

    Modern plants semi-automatic

    1week to mix and mill powders before using

    the « slip »

    High green densities (before firing) of 69%

    can be reached with optimum dispersion and

    particle size distribution

    LAUFEN - Switzerland

  • P. Bowen, EPFL. 13/12/2017 10

    Wet methods – injection moulding – metals & ceramics

    Small precision pieces –very complex forms - precise… 1-2 microns without machining

    Mixture of ceramic or metal powder – polymers (20% wt, 50% vol)

    Heat to 150 - 200°C – plastic injection

    Limitations – expensive tooling (80,000 €) - size limited – cm…

    Very good for large series, thousands of pieces

    Binder burnout… slow 1-3 days…new technology BASF – 2-4 hrs

    HNO3 at 120°C (limited to BASF powder quality…no control)

    http://www.pim-international.com/metal-injection-molding/binders-and-binder-removal-techniques/

    SPT Roth SA- Ceramic injection moulding (CIM) of small complex & precise

    components in micron tolerances. Materials include Alumina, Zirconia, Zirconia-toughened

    Alumina and polycrystalline Ruby. Limitation size max cm….

    •Medical tools & implants - Dental applications - Industrial and Electronic components

    •Nozzles with hole diameter less than 15µm - http://www.smallprecisiontools.com/

    Nozzles

    https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_iii/otm_iii_1.html

    http://www.smallprecisiontools.com/products-and-solutions/fine-ceramics-solutions/ceramic-materials-table/?oid=439&lang=enhttp://www.smallprecisiontools.com/products-and-solutions/fine-ceramics-solutions/custom-engineered-ceramic-parts-application-examples/medical-tools-and-implants-bioceramic-biocompatible-ceramic/?oid=522&lang=enhttp://www.smallprecisiontools.com/products-and-solutions/fine-ceramics-solutions/custom-engineered-ceramic-parts-application-examples/dental-applications-anatomical-shape-translucent-ceramics/?oid=523&lang=enhttp://www.smallprecisiontools.com/products-and-solutions/fine-ceramics-solutions/custom-engineered-ceramic-parts-application-examples/industrial-components-wear-resistance-high-precision/?oid=524&lang=enhttp://www.smallprecisiontools.com/products-and-solutions/fine-ceramics-solutions/custom-engineered-ceramic-parts-application-examples/electronic-applications-high-complexity-wear-resistance/?oid=677&lang=enhttp://www.smallprecisiontools.com/products-and-solutions/fine-ceramics-solutions/custom-engineered-ceramic-parts-application-examples/ceramic-and-metallic-nozzles-with-small-precision-holes/?oid=891&lang=en

  • Wet methods - general limitations

    • Slip casting slow…can speed up with – addition of pressure but complexity

    of form still limited

    • Drying – slow – days…

    • Limited thickness…cm’s

    • Injection moulding – high cost of tooling...need to test proof of concept

    before making expensive tools…

    • Additive manufacturing – initially called rapid prototyping – proof of

    concept…for complex pieces...then perhaps use injection moulding…

    • Much work over past 20 years …become interesting for pieces…

    • improved resolution, improved green body homogeneity

    • Giving comparable sintered densities to standard techniques

    • New Horizons are promising – even more complex pieces…..

    11

  • Additive manufacturing

    • Ceramics –

    • The most difficult thing for ceramic processing is to make a

    complex shape with high reliability!

    • The most critical part for ceramic processing is particles, not

    sintering…

    • Once forming done to best possible packing and best

    homogeneity and uniformity (densities, pore sizes) then

    advanced sintering techniques can be useful

    • If not always limited by heterogeneities…weak points for

    mechanical properties or optical properties…

    • Slides 46-79 week 1……

    • Metals

    • …complex shapes …and sintering at same time

    • Selective Laser Sintering…

    12

  • Additive manufacturing – 3D printing techniques for

    ceramics* - direct technologies

    13

    DIWDIPFDC

    3DP SLSDLP/SLA

    Lewsi et al J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 89 [12] 3599 (2006)

    Ceramic particles in appropriate

    thermoplastic binders

    Ink is continuously

    extruded through a fine

    cylindrical nozzle

    Direct ink-jet printing

    Ink-jet printing of material

    in the form of droplets

    in a desired pattern via a

    layer-by-layer build

    sequence

    Lous et al J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 83 [1] 124 (2000)

    *Franks et al. J Am Ceram Soc 2017; 1–33

    *Zocca et al. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 98 [7] 1983–2001 (2015)

    Suspension/ink

  • Additive manufacturing – 3D printing techniques for

    ceramics – powder beds – indirect technologies

    14

    3DP SLSDLP/SLA

    Stereolithography

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM55ct5KwiI

    Stereolithography (SLA) and

    Digital light processing (DLP)

    -similar principles – different possible

    outputs.

    Both use UV or light curable resins

    SLA - laser that travels over the cross

    sectional area of each layer of the part

    DLP uses digital light projector screen to

    flash a single image of each layer all at once

    Powder bed Powder bed

    binder

    Powder-Based 3D Printing –

    an inkjet printing head spits

    a binding

    liquid onto a powder bed,

    thus defining the cross

    section

    of the object in that layer.

    Selective Laser Sintering local densification of the powders by directly sintering. Direct laser sintering of ceramics

    is complicated by the poor resistance of this class of materials to thermal shock. But good with metals

  • European leaders

    15

    Lift-up DLP

    Common Strategy: flocculated ceramic resin with very high viscosity!

    Top-Down SLA

  • What can it do?

  • - - Shanghai (China) (Prof. Zhao Zhe)

    20

    Low shrinkage during printing, the thin sheet of 300mm can be sintered

    without noticeable deformation

    Low viscosity which lead to potential applications with desk-top machines

    Easy to be burned resin design which is critical for fast processing and also

    low post-processing cost

    Top-Down DLP and SLA;

    Low Viscosity dispersion-type ceramic resins

  • 3D Printing Ceramic Materials

    • Practical Properties:

    – Shelf life-time:6 months with re-dispersability

    – Continuous Work Time:2 weeks

    – Smallest channel size:200mm

    – Thinnest wall thickness:300mm

    – Smallest support size:200mm

    – Viscosity at 30s-1: 800-3000cps

    – Exposure time:3-30sec (DLP), >1500mm/sec (SLA)

    – Penetration thickness:>100-300mm

    21

    • Density after sintering: 3.93g/cm3 for 99.99% pure

    alumina and 6.03g/cm3 for zirconia 3Y-TZP

    • Printing time: 50mm layer thickness, each layer

    20sec, almost 1cm/hour

    • The principles for printing materials development:

    surface modification of powder is the key!

  • Still defects observed….cf standard processing

    22

    Reality: inter-layer defects, incomplete edges and fringes of layer thickness….

  • Reduced Defects By Better Power Dispersion

    23

    Inter-layer can be reduced but still some small pores need to be removed! Further development of slurry is necessary。

    3Y-TZP,1600°C

    3Y-TZP,1600°C

  • Topological Design For Structure And Functions

    • Light-weight design;truss-like cellar/lattice structure design; Biomimiticstructure and functions.

    • It is very promising that 3D printing ceramics can break the bottle-neck limits

    for ceramic material applications…open new avenues….

    24

  • The Intrinsic Benefits from 3D Printing

    25

    • Built through layer-by-layer mode, limited thickness and volume of elastic

    ceramic materials will decrease the residual stress during the forming and

    sintering stages.

    • It is expected that 3D printed Ceramics can be better than traditional processing

    products if material design can be good enough.

    • Material design golden rule: low shrinkage during the layer

    stacking/solidification.

    • This will improve the binding strength between layers and also reduce all

    structural defects which severely affect the reliability of ceramics.

    • Key for Success:good powder dispersion and good material design

    • Commercialization:focus on Sterolithography but with solid consideration with precision and size.

  • P. Bowen, EPFL,CdP 13/12/2017 26

    Steric -polymer adsorption – layer thickness

    Dispersion – Colloidal Stability - IMPORTANT

    Repulsive

    Electrostatic, ion adsorption, dissociation, polyelectrolyte

    h

    (a)

    (b)

    ++

    +

    +

    ++

    +

    +

    +

    ++

    ++

    +

    +

    ++

    +

    +

    +

    ++

    (distance h between particles)

    hak al

    r = ( h + 2a )

    *U. Aschauer, et al J. Dispersion Science Technology, 32(4), 470 – 479 (2011).

    ( ), , 212k lha a h

    aF A

    h 2 k l

    k l

    a aa

    a a

    Harmonic average radius

    2

    2

    0 22

    1

    h L

    ES h L

    eF a

    e

    Electrostatic potential

    From zeta potential)

    1/ Electricaldouble layer thickness

    5

    3

    2

    3 2, 2 1

    5

    B adsster k l

    k T LF a a a

    s h

    Lads - Adsorbed layer thickness, s - Spacing of adsorbed molecules

    In mushroom configuration – geometry important

    Attractive - dispersion or Van der Waals forces – A(h) – Hamaker constant

    (dielectric properties)

    26

    L – charge/zeta plane

  • Dispersion – Colloidal Stability - IMPORTANT

    ♦ Net potential/force is algebraic sum of

    repulsive and attractive forces

    #Robert J. Flatt, Paul Bowen, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 89 [4] 1244–1256 (2006)

    0

    Inte

    rac

    tio

    n E

    ne

    rgy

    charge

    polymer

    Attraction - VdW

    h

    (-)

    (+)

    1-4 nm

    Repulsion total

    ,htotal VdW ES SterhaF F F F

    Total Interaction

    VT = VA + VR

    Maximum Energy Barrier, VT = VVdW + VE (+ VS )

    27

    2 k l

    k l

    a aa

    a a

    Harmonic average radius

    hak al

    r = ( h + 2a )

  • Selective Laser Sintering - ExampleTHESE N◦ 3716 (2006)

    PRESENTEE A L’ INSTITUT DE PRODUCTION ET ROBOTIQUE (IPR)

    ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANNE

    POUR L’OBTENTION DU GRADE DE DOCTEUR ̀ ES SCIENCES

    PAR

    CEDRIC ANDRE

    EPFL

    Laboratoire de Gestion et Procédés de Production (LGPP)

    Institut de Production et Robotique (IPR)

    CH-1015 Lausanne

    Switzerland

    acceptée sur proposition du jury :

    Prof. R. Glardon, directeur de thèse

    Dr. E. Boillat, directeur de thèse

    Prof. N. Boudeau, rapporteur

    Dr. P. Bowen, rapporteur

    Dr. C. Martin, rapporteur

    Lausanne, EPFL, 2006

  • Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)

    Applications....2017...

    - Stainless steel - automotive industry

    - Heat exchangers (SS)

    - T- Blade Aerospace (thermal barrier support)(Ti)

    - Laminar flow reversers (Al) (plant engineering)

    - Dental crowns and bridges, Sensor element - CoCr (Medical)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te9OaSZ0kf8

    VIDEO _ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEfdO4p4SFc

    METHOD

    1. First layer

    2. Laser sweeps surface

    -partial melting of particles

    - consolidation on cooling

    3. Reservoir descends

    – second layer sintered

    4. Repeat steps 1-3…

    UT Austin, 1995Advantages

    1. Metals, polymers,

    ceramics(mixed with polymers)

    2. Rapid fabrication – CAD file

    3. Recycle non-used powder

    4. Complex geometries…possible

    5. Graded layers or gradients

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEfdO4p4SFc

  • Powder technology related questions

    • Powder bed density (particle arrangement)

    • Heat transport in a powder bed

    • Mass transport in a powder bed

    • Sintering, surface quality....

    P0 - power (w)

    f - pulse frequency kHz)

    h – distance de ratser (mm)

    v – speed of sweep (mm/s9

    ecouche - layer thickness (mm)(200-700 mm)

    rbed - layer density before

    sintering (g/cm3)

    tp- pulse duration (nsecs)

    Parameters Microstructure

    Density

    Roughness

    Mechanical

    Hardnes

    Precision…

    Properties

  • Key Parameters for SLS

    31

    • How energy is supplied to the powder ?

    • How much energy is supplied to the powder ?

    • To what is this energy brought?

  • Microscopic properties of the powder and bed

    • Stainless steeel – model powder

    • Follows log-normal distribution

    • Low agglomeration factor 1.4

    • Apparent density (RLP) – 4.4 g/cm3 (56%)

    • Tapped density (RCP) – 5.2 g/cm3 (67%)

    • Bed density varied from 4.3 to 4.6 g/cm3

    32

  • DEM – modelling (C. Martin – Grenoble)

    • Gas – compressed – particle coordination number (Z) and density (rbed)

    33

    o DEM results between RLP and

    RCP found experimentally

    o Apparent density - 56%

    o Tapped density - 67%

    m - coefficient of friction

    w energy of adhesion (J/m2)

    DEM

    conditions

    Properties

    m w r bed Z

    0 0 65.2 5.4

    0.2 0 58.3 4.7

    0.2 1 57.4 5.6?

  • SLS – control of microstructures

    Statistical analysis and simulation (DEM)

    • 39 points – statistical experimental hybrid design – looking for

    • Relationship – microstrcrural parameter - h = h(tP, Er, rbed).

    34

    rb

    ed

    g.c

    m-3

    []

    Er [J.mm-2]

    tP [ns]

    tP [ns]

    Er

    [J.m

    m-2

    ]

    h

    X1 ≡ tP

    X2 ≡ Er

    X3 ≡ rlit

  • Microstructural Parameter* - h

    • From solid area ( = total area-pore area) – Fs

    • Perimeter of pore-solid interface – p

    • And equivalent perimeter of powder bed before sintering – pFs

    • pFs = dv50 nFs , where nFs the number of particles to cover analysis area)

    • From image analysis….get binary image ….

    • Can describe the fineness and denisty of the sintered layer

    35

    Original grey scale Binary image

    *Thesis Cedric Andre , EPFL, N◦ 3716 (2006)

  • Microstructural Parameter* - h

    36*Thesis Cedric Andre , EPFL, N◦ 3716 (2006)

    h = 0.35 0.5 0.7

    Classe 1 :

    fine

    heterogeneous

    Classe 2 :

    fine

    homogeneous

    Classe 3 :

    large

    oriented

    Classe 4 :

    Large melted

    Affinement de la structure

    • 4 – classes of microstructure…according to h

    0.9

  • Energy Density

    37

    sample a03, h = 0.87sample m074, h = 0.80

    P0 = 11W, v = 40mm.s-1, h = 45mm, P = 2 kW

    ^

    Er = 6.1 J.mm-2

    tP = 550 ns

    rlit = 4.3 g.cm-3

    P0 = 6W, v = 22.2mm.s-1, h = 45mm, P = 0.5 kW

    ^

    • Same energy density but different power and velocities….

    • Similar if slightly different features…according to h

  • Influence of powder bed

    thickness

  • Concrete!!!!

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzmCnzA7hnE

    39

    • ETHZ – NCCR

    • Digital

    Fabrication

  • Today’s Objectives

    This Week

    • Standard forming methods…..ceramics and metals

    – Dry Pressing…(Generalities from 3rd year & summary PT compaction

    courses – weeks 4&5 file PowderTech 4)

    – Wet methods – overview - slip casting, tape casting, injection moulding

    – Limitations …additive manufacturing approach

    – General intro to additive manufacturing…video…importance of dispersion!!!

    – Green bodies…Sintering…standard procedures (next week)…

    • Additive manufacturing and sintering combined – SLS

    – Introduction…..Video…..

    – Detailed study thesis Cedric André importance of particle packing …..

    Next week …

    • Summary of standard sintering methods and procedures

    • New sintering processes, SPS, flash sintering, cold sintering…

    • Typical questions, Powder Technology – Learning outcomes,

    • Exam….

    4

  • Teaching plan 2017

    Files of lectures and notes to be found on LTP website : http://ltp.epfl.ch/Teaching

    Week-DATE File.

    no.

    Powder Technology – Wednesday 10.15-12.00 – MXG 110

    1- sept 20 1 Introduction - PB

    2 – sept 27 2 Powder packing and compaction - 1- PB -

    3 – oct 4 3 Powder packing and compaction - 2-PB- and guest lecturer - MS

    4 – oct 11 4 Powder packing and compaction -3- PD

    5 – oct 18 4 Powder packing and compaction - 4 – PD

    6 – oct 25 5 Particle – Particle Interactions 1 - PB

    7 – nov1 6 Particle – Particle Interactions 2- PB

    8 – nov 8 7 Particle – Particle Interactions - 3-PB

    9 – nov -15 8 Introduction to atomistic scale simulations PD

    10 – nov 22 9 Compaction, Sintering & Defects in metals at atomistic scale - PD

    11 -nov-29 11 Sintering Mechanisms& New Technologies - 1 – PD

    12 - dec 6 11 Sintering Mechanisms & New Technologies - 2 - PD

    13 – dec 13 10 Sintering Mechanisms &New Technologies -3 PB

    14 – dec 20 12 Sintering Mechanisms & New Technologies- and exam 4 – PB

    PB – Prof. Paul Bowen (EPFL), PD – Dr. Peter Derlet (PSI)

    MS- Dr. Mark Sawley (EPFL)