poverty ap
TRANSCRIPT
1
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
POVERTY ANALYSIS & MONITORING STRATEGY - AP
2
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Chapter I
Disaggregated Poverty, its Analysis and
Mapping
3
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
4
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
DISTRIBUTION OF MANDALS TO FEMALE LITERACY RATES (1991-2001)
0
100
200
300
400
5000-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
70-80
80-90
90-100
1991
2001
DISTRIBUTION OF MANDALS TO MALE LITERACY RATES (1991-2001)
0
100
200
300
400
5000-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
70-80
80-90
90-100
1991
2001
5
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
6
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Mahabubnagar_91
Mahabubnagar_01
Ananthapur_91
Ananthapur_01
Prakasam_91
Prakasam_01
Warangal_91
Warangal_01
0-10
10-2
0
20-3
0
30-4
0
40-5
0
50-6
0
60-7
0
70-8
0
80-9
0
90-1
00
0-10
10-2
0
20-3
0
30-4
0
40-5
0
50-6
0
60-7
0
70-8
0
80-9
0
90-1
00
PROGRESS OF LITERACY RATEPERCENTAGE OF MANDALS IN EACH DISTRICT LITERACY RATE WISE 1991 - 2001
FEMALE MALE
7
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
PRIMARY ENROLMENT - DROP OUT RATES (1999-00 & 2002-03)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Bo
ys_
En
rol
Bo
ys_
Dro
po
ut
Gir
ls_
En
rol
Gir
ls_
Dro
po
ut
Bo
ys_
En
rol
Bo
ys_
Dro
po
ut
Gir
ls_
En
rol
Gir
ls_
Dro
po
ut
1999-2000 2002-2003
8
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
9
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
20 km0 10
DPAP
APRLP - GMIS OF MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT
APRLP Mandals
5
Railway
183
20
Other Mandals
50
National highway
State highway
Number of SHGsper habitation
N
Number of SHGs per habitationDec 2001
Spatial distribution of SHGs
PIP AND POVERTY DENSITY TO BE MAPPED AND SUPERIMPOSED ON ACUTE POVERTY AREAS ON SIMILAR LINES
10
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Chapter II
The Approach and Methodology
11
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY:THE APPROACH• COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSTANDING OF POVERTY
AND DETERMINANTS– POVERTY MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND TOOLS
• CHOOSING PUBLIC ACTIONS HAVING HIGHEST POVERTY IMPACT– DEVELOPMENT TASKS AND LOGFRAME– CREATION OF STAKES OF POOR IN POLICY– CAPACITY BUILDING– PRIORITIZATION OF INTERVENTIONS– ACTIONS FACILITATING EXPANSION OF INCOME
OF POOR• OUTCOME INDICATORS SET AND MONITORED
USING PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
12
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
The Guiding Principles• State driven and owned• Results oriented – Sets medium and long term
goals for Poverty Reduction and eradication, including key outcomes and intermediate indicators
• Comprehensive – Multidimensional nature of Poverty to cover areas like rapid economic growth, macro economic stability, structural reforms and social stability-leading to cohesive government policy and to enable poor to share the benefits of growth
13
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Ingredients for the Approach • Need for evidence based policy making : The
Stages– Establish Poverty Baseline *– Set Poverty Reduction Targets– Define Pro Poor Development Strategy– Monitor Progress (Annual)– Feedback to Policy– Evaluate Impact (once three years)
* Improve timeline, increase reliability, reduce costs, improve dissemination, develop new products e.g.maps, graphics etc.,
14
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Current Situation of A.P.,• A.P. has a very Vibrant Poverty Reduction
approach and number of programmes have incorporated steps required to implement and monitor, but:
• HOW DOES THE BIGGER PICTURE LOOK LIKE?
• Do the Missions have a comprehensive agenda and professionals tools for way forward?
• If yes,do they have review mechanism for annual plans and mid course correction?
• Do they have disaggregated poverty analysis and sub project based approach for extreme poverty?
• How externalities are being addressed?
15
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Chapter III
Tasks to prepare draft review plan and
milestones
16
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
2001-2002• 14 Sector wise strategy documents, including
Strategy Paper for Poverty Reduction in A.P., in 2001.The papers had gone through various levels of discussion involving all stakeholders.
• Establishment of Poverty and Social Analysis Monitoring Unit (PSAMU) in Feb-2002 through GO
2002-2003• G.O. for convergence of activities of line
departments with VELUGU programme passed in Nov, Dec, 2002
• Data collection through Participatory Identification of Poor (PIP) for better targeting of Poverty Reduction
2003-2004• G.O. to extend tenure of SPEM Members• Fully staff PSAMU
17
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
DEVELOP DRAFT ACTIONPLAN
• Develop Draft action plan for implementation of PRS in coordination with sectors
• Finalize action plan for implementation of PRS based on consultation with key stakeholders,and begin implementation(?)
• Identify key Poverty Monitoring Indicators, and mechanisms for their regular updating and monitoring
18
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
IDENTIFY KEY POVERTY MONITORING INDICATORS AND MECHANISM FOR THEIR REGULAR UPDATING AND MONITORING
• Create framework of Poverty monitoring beginning with PPA( PIP of DPIP )
• Finalize logframe with PovertyMonitoring Indicators and input/output monitoring w.r.t. Policy, Guidelines, Plans, Capacity building, Action, Microplan, Implementation, Participatory monitoring, GMIS(analysis and graphics)
• Workshop with Sector/Mission Heads on PMI’s• Follow up the log frame and framework of
Poverty monitoring
OUTCOME: FINALISATION OF PMI AND FRAMEWORK OF MONITORING
19
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
FINALIZE ACTION PLAN OF PRS
• Finalize action plan of PRS in consultation with key stakeholders and (begin implementation?)
• Conduct workshops with secondary stakeholders – NGO’s Academicia, Institutions secondary stakeholders to conduct sub district, district, state workshops, public representatives
• Action plan consultation with primary stakeholders, CBO’s, PRI’s
Outcome: Finalized action plan of PRS owned by the sectors and community
20
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
2005-06 / 2006-07SPEM to continue to guide pro poor policy formulation
Progress indicators Reports on key recommendations of SPEM
GoAP to ensure financial and operational sustainable of PSAMU
Finalized action plan for holistic poverty reduction
Evaluation of implementation of PRS and undertake required changes based on lessons from experience
Identified key monitoring indicators tracked regularlyEvaluating studies reflecting improved targeting of anti poverty programmes
Tracking and updating of poverty indicators and dissemination of key findings
21
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Chapter IV
The monitoring Indicators and Logical Framework for
Missions and Sectors
22
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
How to Review and take the Agenda forwardLogical Framework
Goal Greater Why Prl. Secretary
Purpose Why Commissionarate
Outputs What Districts
Activities How Sub Districts
23
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Goal Universal Primary Education by 2010
Outcome indicators
Net enrollment, Ratio in primary education, proportion of completing grade 4
Input/Output activities
•Children out of school as child labour.•5 categories of children•Focus on female literacy•Schemes to promote enrollment•Strategy to retain them•Focus on reduction in dropout
24
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
•Skewed availability of schools and teacher•Involvement of community through committees,•Janmabhoomi and Education audit
Concerns and Externalities
•Role of SHG’s in promoting•Poverty and literacy•Quality of education
Risks and assumption
External factors, “if, and, then” Probability of risks and method to manage them e.g. funds
Monitor, Evaluate and Means of verification
Indicators to monitor
25
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Monitoring and Review
• AP has Mission Based Approach– Literacy– Water– Employment– Poverty– Health& Family welfare?
26
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Missions to facilitate achievement of Goal
• Bring in convergence with other departments
• Facilitate annual review, M&E, Leading to next plan
• How logframe and sectoral plans linked and lead to planning
• End of year review to plan for next year and lacunae to be addressed through new inputs like - research, policy,training, process monitoring, new practices,bilateral support etc.
27
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
State Level Leadership by
• Poverty Eradication Mission• Supported by Poverty Monitoring Unit
and PSU• Have clear cut indicators• Strategic review mechanism with
Baseline, Current, 2005, 2015, 2020
28
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
Reduce extreme poverty by half by 2015
Halve proportion of people suffering from hunger by 2015
Universal primary education by 2015
Promote Gender Equality and empower Women
Reduce under 5 mortality by 2/3rd in 2015
Reduce maternal mortality ratio by 3/4th by 2015
Half by 2015 and begin to reverse the spread of HIV / AIDS
Half and begin to reverse malaria and other diseases
Integrate priniciple of sustainability development and reverse the loss of environmental resource
Halve the proportion of people without access to safe drinking water by 2015
A significant improvement in lives of at least X million slum dwellers
29
POVERTY ERADICATION STRATEGY OF GOVERNMENT OF A P
The Road Map
• Each Department to Delegate on officer to interact with PSU Coordinator
• 4 Missions, Health, Urban Poverty, Rural Poverty
• Sectoral strategy to be completed by 20-08-2003• Volume-I and Volume-II to be completed
by 31-08-2003• Final presentation first week of
September, 2003