postmodernism in apologetics

Upload: sathya-poorani

Post on 03-Apr-2018

235 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    1/45

    POST-MODERNISM

    TRUTH AS PREFERENCE

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    2/45

    Pre-modernism (upto 1600)

    God/gods furnished the basis of:

    absolutes

    Morality

    human dignity and

    truth (upto 1600s)

    Best illustrated by Anslem:

    I believe in order to understand

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    3/45

    Premodernism Major themes

    There is an overall explanation of things, in

    terms of inclusiveness with respect to all of

    reality and of the whole of history.

    Reality has a rational character. History is

    going somewhere, fulfilling some discernible

    pattern. It is therefore possible to make sense

    of reality.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    4/45

    Premodernism Major themes

    Observable nature does not exhaust all of

    reality. There are real and important entities

    lying beyond nature.

    The meaning, happiness and fulfillment of

    humans require understanding these realities

    and responding to them correctly. An element

    of faith is required.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    5/45

    Premodernism Major themes

    The time, as we know it, is not the whole of

    reality. An additional dimension of life, and in

    many ways its most important aspect, lies

    beyond time.

    The unchanging and the permanent are most

    important. Without these, the flux of

    experiences would have no real meaning.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    6/45

    Enlightenment - Modernism (1600-1960s)

    Francis Bacon (1561-1626)

    Scientific Discovery and inter-relationsbetween the sciences

    Temporal life as very significant in itself

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    7/45

    Isaac Newton

    Admit no more causes of natural things than

    such are both true and sufficient to explain

    their appearance.

    Law of universality of cause and effect.

    Deterministic universe

    Absolute space and time God as creator

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    8/45

    Rene Descartes

    Foundationalism

    Definitional undeniability and deductive logic.

    Cogito ergo sum Pure and attentive mind as opposed to

    fleeting testimony of the senses or the

    deceptive judgment of imagination with itsfalse constructions.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    9/45

    Immanuel Kant

    Mind at the center of knowing process.Knowledge involves both the logical structure

    supplied by the understanding as form and

    sensation to provide content. Objectivity of knowledge. One individual

    knower can have the knowledge that is same

    as another individual as the structure ofreason is same for everyone

    Objectivity of morality.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    10/45

    Modernism main points

    Knowledge is considered to be a good that is to be

    sought without restriction. Knowledge will provide

    solution to humanitys problems. This confidence inknowledge therefore contributes to a belief in

    progress.

    Objectivity is both desirable and possible. It is

    believed that any personal or subjective factor canbe eliminated from the knowing process, thus

    rendering the conclusions certain

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    11/45

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    12/45

    Modernism main points

    The structure of reality is rational. It follows an

    orderly pattern. The same logical structure of

    the external world is also found in human

    mind, thus enabling the human to know and

    organize the world. This order is usually

    believed to be immanent within the world,

    rather than deriving from some transcendentsource.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    13/45

    Modernism - Principles

    Reason

    Principles of Nature

    Autonomy no appeal to authority

    Harmony

    Progress

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    14/45

    Modernism

    Principles of Modernity basis for:

    Absolutes

    Morality human dignity

    Truth

    Best illustrated by Descartes:

    I think therefore I am

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    15/45

    Some key features of postmodern thinking:

    A commitment to plurality of perspectives, meanings,methods, values-everything!

    2. A search for and appreciation of double meanings andalternative interpretations, many of them ironic andunintended.

    3. A critique or distrust of Big Stories meant to explaineverything. This includes grand theories of science, and mythsin our religions, nations, cultures, and professions that serveto explain why things are the way they are.

    4. An acknowledgment that-because there is a plurality of

    perspectives and ways of knowing-there are also multipletruths.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    16/45

    Four easy steps to becoming a

    postmodernist:

    1. Consider concepts, ideas and objects as texts.Textual meanings are open to interpretation.

    2. Look for binary oppositions in those texts. Someusual oppositions are good/bad, progress/tradition,

    science/myth, love/hate, man/woman, andtruth/fiction.

    3. "Deconstruct" the text by showing how theoppositions are not necessarily true.

    4. Identify texts which are absent, groups who arenot represented and omissions, which may or maynot be deliberate, but are important.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    17/45

    Developments in the

    Western World

    Pre-modernism:

    God/gods furnish

    basis of absolutes,morality, human

    dignity and truth

    Modernism: Absolutes,

    morality, human dignity

    and truth rest onfoundations other than

    God

    Postmodernism: No universal foundationfor truth, morality, human dignity and

    truth exists. All meta narratives are suspect

    whether religious or not

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    18/45

    Pre-modernism:

    upto 1600s

    Anslem: I believein order to

    understand

    Modernism: 1600

    to 1960

    Descartes : I thinktherefore I am

    Postmodernism: 1960 to..

    I belong therefore, I am

    Developments in the Western

    World

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    19/45

    Gods of the Eras

    Pre-modernism:

    Priest

    Modernism:

    Scientist

    Postmodernism:

    Artist

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    20/45

    How did it happen?

    1.Change in epistemologyAccording to Foucault, Western society believed:

    1. That an objective body of knowledge existsand is waiting to be discovered

    2. That they actually possess such knowledgeand that it is neutral or value-free

    3. That the pursuit of knowledge benefits allhumankind and not just a specific class

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    21/45

    Changes in structures of

    life

    Deterritoralization

    Cyberspace and Virtual Reality

    Consumerism

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    22/45

    Post-Modernism

    Fathers of Radical Doubt:

    Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)Psycho-analysis

    Karl Marx (1818-1883) Socio-Economics

    Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) - Morality

    Charles Darwin (1809-1882) - Science

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    23/45

    The Traditional Humanist Model

    That there is a real world out there that we canunderstand with our rational minds.

    That language is capable of (more or less) accuratelydepicting that real world

    That language is a product of the individual writer'smind or free will, meaning that we determine whatwe say, and what we mean when we say it; thatlanguage thus expresses the essence of ourindividual beings (and that there is such a thing as anessential unique individual "self").

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    24/45

    The Concept beneath Humanist Model

    a totalizing concept puts all phenomena under oneexplanatory concept (e.g. it's the will of God)

    an essentialist concept suggests that there is areality which exists independent of, beneath orbeyond, language and ideology -- that there is such athing as 'the feminine', for instance, or 'truth' or'beauty'

    a foundationalist concept suggests that signifyingsystems are stable and unproblematicrepresentations of a world of fact which isisomorphic with human thought.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    25/45

    The Humanist Concept of Man

    Individuals are sacred, separate and intact.

    Their minds are the only true realm of

    meaning and value.

    Their rights are individual and inalienable.

    Their value and nature is rooted in a universal

    and transhistorical essence -- a metaphysical

    being.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    26/45

    Structuralism A blow to humanist

    concept

    Linguistics as a model for the structure of thought De Saussuresign= signified + signifier

    Binary oppositions Male/female

    Adult/child Good/ evil

    Dark/light

    Nature/culture

    Life/ death

    Rich/poor

    Reason/emotion

    Truth/illusion

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    27/45

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    28/45

    Derrida

    Difference

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    29/45

    Derrida

    Logocentricism.

    Speech/writing binary. Speech gets associated withpresence and both get favoured over writing andabsence. e.g. Let there be light.

    This favoring of presence over absence that everysystem ( It could be a philosophical system, but theidea works for signifying systems as well) posits aCENTER, a place from which the whole systemcomes, and which guarantees its meaning--thiscenter guarantees being as presence.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    30/45

    Center

    Self as a system. . At the core or center of ones

    mental and physical life is a notion of SELF, of an "I",

    of an identity that is stable and unified and coherent,

    the part of one that knows who one means whenone says "I". This core self or "I" is thus the CENTER

    of the "system", the "langue" of ones being, and

    every other part of one (each individual act) is part of

    the "parole". The "I" is the origin of all one says anddo, and it guarantees the idea of ones presence,

    ones being.

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    31/45

    Text as Reality

    Author as a site Barthes

    Text as a play

    All meaning is textual and intertextual: there is no "outside ofthe text," as Derrida remarked. Everything we can know isconstructed through signs, governed by the rules of discoursefor that area of knowledge, and related to other texts throughfiliation, allusion and repetition. Every text exists only inrelation to other texts; meaning circulates in economies ofdiscourse. This understanding does not mean that all reality istextual, only that what we can know of it, and how we can

    know, is textual, constructed through discourse, with all itsrules; through symbols, linguistic and otherwise; throughgrammar(s).

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    32/45

    Deconstruction

    Texts are marked by a surplus of meaning; the result

    of this is that differing readings are inevitable, indeed

    a condition of meaning at all. This surplus is located

    in the polysemous nature of both language and ofrhetoric. It must be kept in mind that language is

    what is, that our sense of reality is linguistically

    constructed. Consequently the 'meaning of it all' is

    continually differing, overflowing, in flux. Deconstruction

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    33/45

    Gurus of Post Modernism Jacques Derrida

    Abandon Onto-Theology & Meta-physics of presence

    Michel Foucault

    Every interpretation is to exercise power Jean Francois Lyotard

    Meta-narratives loosing power

    Richard Rorty

    Give up search for truth and be content with interpretation

    Jean Baudrilard

    Illusion and reality

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    34/45

    Characteristics of Post Modernism1

    There is no meta-narrative (grand story) that

    can account for all reality

    There are only narratives (small stories) It is the view that there are no world-views

    There is no universal foundation on which

    knowledge or reality is based

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    35/45

    Characteristics of Post Modernism2

    Objectivity is an illusion

    Truth mind-dependent, mind-created

    Truth is made not found

    Everything depends on perspective

    History is always the version of the powerful andmasks a power agenda which must be exposed and

    hidden voices heard, particularly the voices of themarginalized which includes women, the weak, theinsane, the homosexual

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    36/45

    Characteristics of Post Modernism3

    Deconstruction - there is no meaning in the

    text

    Language does not reflect reality

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    37/45

    VaclavHavel,

    CzechRepublic

    .We live in a

    postmodern world,

    where everything ispossible and almost

    nothing is certain

    M d i P t d i

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    38/45

    Modernism

    Belief inUniversals

    Faith in humancapacities

    Conquest ofNature

    Mechanistic

    Universe

    Postmodernism

    Believes all isdifference

    Cynicism andsuspicion

    Cooperation withnature

    Relational

    Universe

    1/4

    M d i P t d i

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    39/45

    Modernism

    Personal view of

    truth Appearance IS

    reality

    Just the FACTS,please

    The universal

    Postmodernism

    Community based

    view of truth Appearance is not

    necessarily reality

    Onlyinterpretations

    The local

    2/4

    M d i P t d i

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    40/45

    Modernism

    Uniformity andSingularity

    Beliefs as timelessand transcendent

    The factory as

    symbol (industry) Purity in

    style(forms..)

    Postmodernism

    Radical Relativismand Pluralism

    Beliefs as sociallylocated & constructed

    The computer as

    symbol(information) Impurity(playfulness.)

    3/4

    M d i P t d i

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    41/45

    Modernism

    Timeless ideals

    Singular reality

    Rationalmanagement

    Postmodernism

    Transience;

    nothing lastsCo-existing or

    multiple realities

    Creativedisorder; chaos

    theory

    4/4

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    42/45

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    43/45

    Stanley Grenz:

    Critical Engagement with postmodernism cannotend with a simplistic rejection of the entire

    ethos We must engage postmodernism in order

    to discern how best to articulate the Christian

    Faith to the next generation

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    44/45

    The Post-Modern Gospel

    A Post-Individualistic Gospel

    A Post-Rationalistic Gospel

    A Post-Dualistic Gospel

    A Post-Noeticentric Gospel

  • 7/28/2019 Postmodernism in apologetics

    45/45

    Stanley Grenz

    Our task as Christs disciples is to embody andarticulate the never-changing good newsin a

    manner that the emerging generation can

    understand. Only then can we be vehicles of theHoly Spirit in bringing them to experience the life-

    changing encounter with the Triune God from

    whom our entire lives derive their meaning