postextraction alveolar ridge preservation_ biological basis and treatments

Upload: dorinkarakoglu

Post on 03-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    1/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 1

    Abstract

    Full-TextPDF

    Full-TextHTML

    Full-TextePUB

    LinkedReferences

    HowtoCitethisArticle

    CompleteSpecialIssue

    InternationalJournalofDentistryVolume2012(2012),ArticleID151030,13pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/151030

    ReviewArticle

    PostextractionAlveolarRidgePreservation:BiologicalBasisandTreatments

    GiorgioPagni,1GaiaPellegrini ,1WilliamV.Giannobile,2,3andGiulioRasperini1

    1UnitofPeriodontology,DepartmentofBiomedical,SurgicalandDentalSciences,UniversityofMilan,FoundationIRCCSCGranda,20142Milan,Italy2DepartmentofPeriodonticsandOralMedicineandMichiganCenterforOralHealthResearch,AnnArbor,

    MI,USA3DepartmentofBiomedicalEngineering,CollegeofEngineering,UniversityofMichigan,AnnArbor,MI,USA

    Received15February2012;Accepted2April2012

    AcademicEditor:FigenCizmeciSenel

    Copyright2012GiorgioPagnietal.Thisisanopenaccess articledistributedundertheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited.

    Abstract

    Followingtoothextraction,thealveolarridgeundergoesaninevitableremodelingprocessthatinfluencesimplanttherapyof theedentulouarea.Socketgraftingisacommonlyadoptedtherapyforthepreservationofalveolarbonestructuresincombinationornotwithimmediatimplantplacementalthoughthebiological baseslyingbehind thistreatmentmodalityarenot fullyunderstoodandoftenmisinterpretedThis review is intended to clarifythe literature support tosocketgrafting inorder toprovide practitionerswith valid tools tomakeconsciousdecisionofwhenandwhytorecommendthistherapy.

    1.Introduction

    Anatomicalchangesandphysiologicalprocessestakingovertoothextractionwerestudiedinthepast[13];however,sincetheintroductionofdentalimplantsinmodernodontology,theseissuesandthepreventionofedentulousjawatrophyhavebecomeveryhottopics.Thsurvival of implants and theirability toprovide adequate functionand esthetic arestrictlycorrelatedwith their properpositioning inrelationtothealveolarhousing,theneighboringteethandtheoccludingdentition.Itisthuseasilyunderstoodthetremendouseffortthathas beenused bymany researchers and practitioners in reducing thisunavoidablemodelingand remodelingprocess. Thisarticlegoethroughthebiologicalbasisforsocketaugmentationprocedureandtheavailabletreatmentoptionstopreventedentulousridgeatrophy.

    2.AlveolarRidgeRemodeling

    Maxillary andmandibular bony complexes are composed by several anatomical structures with a proper function, composition, andphysiology:(i) basalbonethatdevelopstogetherwiththeoverallskeleton,andformsthebodyofmandibleandmaxilla;(ii)alveolarprocesthatdevelopsfollowingtootheruptionandcontainsthetoothalveolus;(iii)thebundlebonethatlinesthealveolarsocket,extendscoronallyforming the crestof thebuccalbone,andmakespartof theperiodontalstructureas itencloses the external terminationsof periodontafibres(Sharpeysfibers).

    After tooth extraction, bundle bone appears to be the first bone tobe absorbed [46] whereas alveolar bone is gradually absorbedthroughoutlife[7,8].Theremodelingprocessresultsinaridgemorphologyreducedinverticalheightandmorepalatalinrelationtotheoriginaltoothposition[13,9].

    Studiesfromanotherresearchgroupsuggestbone resorptiontooccur in2 phases (seeFigure 1).Duringthefirstphase,bundleboneisrapidlyresorbedandreplacedwithwovenboneleadingtoagreatreductioninboneheightespeciallyinthebuccalaspectofthesocket,asitcrestalportioniscomprisedsolelyofbundlebone[ 10].Thebuccalplateexperiencesmoreresorptionevenbecauseitisgenerallythinner

    HindawiPublishingCorporation

    International Journal of Dentistry

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/http://www.hindawi.com/48429076/http://www.hindawi.com/71474535/http://www.hindawi.com/63082720/http://www.hindawi.com/74809096/http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030.pdfhttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/abs/http://www.hindawi.com/http://www.hindawi.com/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B10http://www.hindawi.com/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B10http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B9http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B3http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B1http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B8http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B7http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B6http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B4http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B3http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B1http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/http://www.hindawi.com/74809096/http://www.hindawi.com/63082720/http://www.hindawi.com/71474535/http://www.hindawi.com/48429076/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/si/470621/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/cta/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ref/http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030.epubhttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030.pdfhttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/abs/
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    2/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 2

    averaging0.8mminanteriorteethand1.1mminpremolarsites[11].In-vitroanimalstudieshavedemonstratedtheosteogenicpotentialoPDL-derivedcells[12,13]althoughtheroleofbundleboneinprovidingcellsfortheregenerationofnewbonehasbeenmorerecentlychallenged[14]asnewboneformationappearstoinitiatefromthesurroundingalveolarbonecells[46].Thisgroup reported that thpresenceorabsenceofPDLintheextractionsocketdoesnotinfluencethefeaturesofhealingafter3months[15].Duringthesecondphasethe outer surface of the alveolar bone is remodeled causing an overall horizontal and vertical tissue contraction. The reason for thiremodelingprocessisstillnotwellunderstood.Disuseatrophy,decreasedbloodsupply,andlocalizedinflammationmightplayimportantroles in bone resorption. However,i t isnowapparent thatbone remodelingisa complexprocess involving structural, functional,andphysiologicfactorsandthatsurgicaltraumafromextractioninducesmicrotraumatosurroundingbone,whichacceleratesboneremodelin[16].

    Figure1:Healingoftheextractionsocketwithandwithoutsocketgrafting.Whensocketgraftingisnotadopted,majoralveolarridge resorptionoccurs.Ina firstphase,initiallythebloodclot, subsequentlythegranulationtissueandlatertheprovisional matrixand thewovenbonefill upthe alveolus. Thebundle bone is completelyresorbed causingareduction inthevertical ridge. Ina second phase, thebuccalwall and thewoven bone are remodeledcausing thehorizontal and further vertical ridge reduction. Whensocket grafting is adopted, the first phase and vertical bonereductionstilloccur,however,thesecondphaseandthehorizontalcontractionarereduced.

    Resorptionrateofthealveolarridgesisfasterduringthefirstsixmonthsfollowingtheextraction[9,17]andproceedsatanaverageof0.51.0%peryearfortheentirelife[7,8].Theheightofahealedsocketneverreachesthecoronallevelofboneattachedtotheextractedtoothandhorizontalresorptionseemstobegreaterin themolar regioncompared tothepremolar area [18,19].Schroppetal.estimatedtwothirdsofthehard andsofttissuechangesoccurin thefirst3months.Theauthorsreported50%ofcrestalwidthtobe lostina12-monthperiod(correspondingto6.1mm;range2.7to12.2mm),2/3ofwhich(3.8mm;30%)occurredinthefirst12weeks.Whenexaminingthepremolarareaonly,alossof alveolarridgewidthof 4.9mm(45%)wasreported,ofwhich3.1mm(28.4%)occurredinthefirst12week

    [20].Arecentlypublishedsystematicreview[21] reportedagreaterhorizontal alveolarridge reduction(2963%;3.79mm)thanverticaboneloss(1122%;1.24mmonthebuccal,0.84mmonmesial,and0.80ondistalsites)at6months.Inalong-termstudy,Ashmanreportedanalveolarboneshrinkageof4060%inheightandwidthwithinthefirst2-3years[8,22].

    3.SocketHealing

    Immediatelyaftertoothextraction,thealveolarsocketisfilledbybloodclotthatisreplacedbygranulationtissuewithin1week(seeFigur1)[23].Inthehealingofaskinwound,epithelialcellsmigrateunderneathandareprotectedbythebloodclot.Insockethealinginstead,thepithelium migrates over the granulation tissue to cover the healing socket [24]. This happens because this inflammatory tissue irecognizedasaconnective tissueby theepithelial cells,therefore, cellularmigrationoccursover itssurface.This is importantwhenwexamineguidedboneregenerationappliedtosocketgrafting.Startingfromtheapicalandlateralresidualbonywalls,thegranulationtissueisrapidlyremodeledtoprovisionalmatrix.Mineralizingprocessesoccurleadingtotheformationofwovenbonethateventuallyisreplacedbymaturelamellarbone[25].Formoreinformationonsockethealingstages,pleaserefertoTable 1.

    Table1:Healingof theextraction socket.Articles reporting timing and histological evidence of extraction sockethealingeventsarereported.

    Earlyhumanhistologicalinvestigationsreportedthatextractionsocketsarefilledwithdelicatecancellousboneintheirapicaltwothirdsa10 weeks, and they are completely filled with bone at 15 weeks [24]. Increased radiopacity is demonstrated as soon as 38 days andradiopacitysimilar tothatof thesurroundingboneat105days[24].These figuresmight bepartiallybiasedasspecimenswereharvestedfromcadavers;thereforetheirlateageandtheirsystemicconditionmighthaveledtodelayedwoundhealingcapabilities.Ontheothersideanimalstudiesdemonstrateacceleratedhealingas3weeksoldextractionsocketsinhumanscomparewith9-10daysoldsocketsindogsanda3.5monthssocketsinhumanscompareswith8weekssocketsindogs[26].

    4.RationaleforExtractionSocketPreservation

    Boneformationinthealveolarsocketisanaturallyoccurringeventaslongassurroundingalveolarwallsremainintact;however,thealveolarridgevolumetriccontractionmayimpairimplantplacement.

    Toreduceloss of alveolarbone to acceptablelevels, several surgicaltechniqueshave beenproposed.Reducing theextractiontraumaandlimiting flap elevation [31] are essential for obtaining success in each of these procedures. Animal studies show mixed results whenevaluatingdifferencesinridgeremodelingbetweenflappedandnonflappedextractionsockets[ 3136]althoughit hasbeenhypothesizedthatbydisruptingthethinlayerofcellsthatcomprisestheosteogeniclayeroftheadultperiosteum,theelevationofaflapmightdiminishthe ability ofperiosteal cells to regeneratebone, whileanundisturbedperiosteummaintains its osteogenicpotential [10, 3739]. It ipossible that flap elevation affects alveolar dimensional alterations only in the short-term [21],while in the long term no appreciabldifferencesarefound[ 36].Inguidedboneregeneration4,methodscanbeusedtoincreasetherateofboneformationandtoaugmentbonvolume:osteoinductionby theuseofappropriategrowthfactors;osteoconduction,whereagraftingmaterialservesasa scaffoldfornewbonegrowth;distractionosteogenesis,bywhichafracture is surgicallyinducedandbonefragmentsarethenslowlypulledapart;finallyguidedtissueregeneration,whichallowsspacesmaintainedbybarriermembranestobefilledwithnewbone[40].Utilizingtheseconcepts

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B36http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B32http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B21http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B35http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B33http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B10http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B32http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B27http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B27http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B26http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B24http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B24http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/tab1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B25http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B24http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B23http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B22http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B8http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B21http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B20http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B19http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B18http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B8http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B7http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B17http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B9http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B16http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B15http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B6http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B4http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B14http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B13http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B12http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B11http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/tab1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    3/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 3

    ithasbeenproposedguidedboneregenerationwithnonresorbableandabsorbablemembranes,severaltypesofbonegraftswithorwithouuseofbarriermembranesortheadditionofmucogingivaltreatments,andmorerecentlytheuseofbioactivemoleculesforthegenerationobonein the extractionsocket.Whenanalyzing the results of the following describedstudies,it shouldbe keptinmindthe goalof thadditionalservicethatisprovidedtothepatient,whichincludethefollowing:

    Inthefollowingsections,severalarticlesattemptingtoobtainthesepurposesbymeansofalveolarridgepreservationwillbereviewedandbrieflysummarized.

    4.1.RidgePreservationwithMembranes

    Guided boneregeneration(GBR) techniques utilize barriermembranes to refrain gingival cellsfrom penetrating into thedefect to bregenerated.TheconceptofcompartmentalizationwasintroducedbyMelcher[ 39]toexplainperiodontalwoundhealing,butitmaynotbapplicabletosockethealing.Ifitwere,onewouldexpectthesockettobefilledwithsofttissueinallinstances.Ontheotherside,evenearlyobservationsinhumansandanimalsdemonstratedthatthealveolarsockettendstohealbyregenerationofboneuptothealveolarcrest.Ainperiodontalwoundhealing[4143],thestabilityofthebloodclotpreviouslydescribedexplainswhythecompartmentalizationconceptdoesnot result in asocket filledby epitheliumand howepithelialcellsmigrateover the granulation tissueto close the healingsocketQuestionsremainastowhetherbarriermembraneshaveaneffectinmaintainingalveolarridgemorphology.

    In 1997, Lekovic and coworkers adopted nonabsorbableePTFE membranes for the preservation of the alveolar ridge following toothextraction.Nochangesinclinicalmeasureswerenotedinthetestsitesthatremainedprotectedfor6monthswhilesignificantvolumetricchangeswereobservedincontrolsitesandintestsitesexperiencingmembraneexposure[44].Pinhoandcoworkersevaluatedtheuseofatitaniummembranewithorwithoutautologousbonegraft.Theyfoundnosignificantdifferencesbetweengroupsand,therefore,concludedthatspacemaintenanceismoreimportantthantheuseofgraftingmaterialsinthetreatmentofextractionsockets[ 45].

    Barriermembranesseemtominimizealveolarboneresorptionwhencomparedtononintact(released)periosteumregardlessoftheuseoadditional grafting material. Titaniummembranes certainlywouldhave adistinctly different mechanism of action when compared toresorbablemembranes thaton theotherside reducethepotential ofexposure anddonot requireasecond surgicalintervention fortheiremoval. In1998,Lekovicetal.examined the effectofglycolideand lactidepolymermembranesdemonstratingreducedlossofalveolaheight,moreinternalbonesocketbonefillandlesshorizontalresorptionthancontrols[46].Luczyszynetal.evaluatedtheeffectofacelluladermal matrixwith orwithout aresorbable hydroxylapatite graft.Both groups preservedridge thickness, although, betterresultswerachievedinthecombinedtreatmentgroupsuggestingthatbonegraftsmightbenefitboneregenerationwhenusingaresorbablemembrane[47].

    Arecentstudyperformedadetailedevaluationofthehealingofextractionsocketscoveredwitharesorbablecollagenmembrane.Throughtheuseofhistologicalevaluation,subtractionradiography,andof-CTanalysis,thisstudydemonstratedthatadequateboneformationfoimplantplacementoccursasearlyas12weeksfollowingtoothextraction,withinsignificantchangesinalveolarridgedimensions[48].

    4.2.RidgePreservationwithBoneGraftsandBoneSubstitutes

    Theclinicaladvantagesofbonefillersinalveolarridgevolumepreservationandpreventionofadditionalbonegraftingprocedurearelargelysupportedbytheavailableliterature[47,4951].Minimalridgeremodelinghasbeenobservedwhenusingnonresorbablehydroxyapatitecrystalscoveredbyarotatedpediculatedsplitthicknesspalatalflap[52],DFDBAcoveredwithanePTFEmembrane[53],orevenallogenicorxenogenic bone grafts coveredwith nothing but a collagen plug [51, 54] (Figure 1). Histological evidence demonstrates that bonformationoccursoverthesurfaceoftheimplantedosteoconductivegraftparticles[ 55,56].At 3monthsorlater,graftedsocketsgenerallydemonstratehighermineralized tissuefigures,whenconsidering bothnew vitalbone andremaining graftparticles,butthe formationonewboneappearstobesimilaringraftedandnongraftedsites.Itcanbeextrapolatedthatresidualparticlesoccupypartofthevolumethawouldhavebeenoccupiedbybonemarrowifbonegraftingwerenotadopted[57].

    At earlierhealing stages (2weeks) instead, grafted sockets demonstrate xenograft particles enclosed in connective tissue andcoated bymultinucleated cellswhennongrafted sitesalreadyshownewly formedwoven bone occupyingmostof the socket[58].Thisresponseitypical ofa foreignbody reactionwhich canbe elicitedby the xenograftand though it is clinically non-immunogenic,non-toxic andchemicallyinert[59],it resultsinadelayedhealingresponseduringtheearlieststagesofsockethealing.Manyarticlesreportedonlyapartiaresorptionofthegraftedparticlesatshortandlongtimepoints[49,53,58,6063]arisingdoubtsontheachievementoftheosteointegratioof implants inserted inaugmentedsites andonthe successof the restorative therapy.Histological animal studies[64, 65] evaluated thosteointegration ofdental implants following boneregeneration performed with different bone fillersand observeda bone-to-implancontactsimilartothatofimplantsplacedinpristinebone(40%to65%).Furthermore,clinicalstudiesobservedthatgoodprimarystabilitycanbereachedatimplantinsertion,thatthegraftingproceduredoesnotimpairearlyosteointegration[66,67],andthatimplantsplacedinboneregeneratedusingmineralizedgraftsareabletosustainloadingandprovidesimilarlong-termresultsasthoseplacedinpristinebon[68].

    Mineralizedgraftingmaterialsmayinterferewiththeearlieststagesofsockethealingandtheireliminationmayrequireseveralyears[57]o

    (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)

    toenableinstallationandstabilityofadentalimplant,toreducelossofalveolarbonevolume,toreduceneedforadditionalbonegraftingprocedures,toenablethegeneratedtissuestoprovideimplantosseointegration,toimprovetheestheticoutcomeofthefinalprosthesis,toregeneratebonefasterallowingearlierimplantationandrestoration.

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B64http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B63http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B62http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B61http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B60http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B59http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B56http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B54http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B49http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B45http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B55http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B54http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B52http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B51http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B50http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B47http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B49http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B48http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B47http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B45http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B43http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B44http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B43http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B42http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B41http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B40http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B39http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B37http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B35
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    4/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 4

    theymayinfactbenonresorbableeveninthelongterm[62].Ontheotherside,theirabilitytopreventcrestalridgeresorptionandsustainlong-termimplantsuccesshasbeenclearlydemonstrated[ 6668].

    Otheradvantagesintheuseofosteoconductivegraftingmaterialwerereportedbyaclinicalandhistologicalhumanstudyofpostextractivdefectsinposteriormaxillaryareatreatedwithaxenogenicgraft.Inthisstudy,Rasperinietal.confirmedthespace-maintainingactivityotheimplantedmaterialandreportedadecreaseddemandforsinusliftaugmentationprocedurewhenthesocketpreservationprocedurewaperformed[63].Throughacomputedtomographyanalysisofmaxillaryanteriorpostextractivedefects,Nevins etal.reportedthat79%ografted sitesunderwent lessthan 20%buccalplateloss,while71%of nongraftedsitesdemonstratedmorethan20%buccalplateloss.Aninterestingfindingofthisinvestigationwasthateventheexperiencedsurgeonsparticipatingtothisstudywerenotabletopredictthefateothebuccalplate,therefore,theauthorssuggestedsocketgraftingtobeperformedatthetimeofextraction[ 69].

    4.2.1.BuccalBoneOverbuilding

    Anothertechniquethatmaybeadoptedistoaugmentthebuccalbonebyimplantinggraftmaterialsonitsbuccalsurface.Simonetal.usedDFDBAcoveredbyabioabsorbablemembranefortheaugmentationprocedure.Thedimensionsontheridgewereaugmentedcomparedtothe originalvolume butthe invasivenessandtechnical demandof thisprocedure mayrefrainthe clinicianfrom itsuse ineverydaypractice[70].Inanotherstudy,2differentgraftingtechniqueswereadoptedaccordingtowhetherthebuccalbonewasintactordehiscenceSocketswithanintactbuccalboneweregraftedtothelevelofthealveolarcrest,amembranewasusedtoprotectthedefect,andtheflapwaclosed by primary intention while sockets with deficient buccal bone were augmented. Their results showed complete loss of thhorizontallyaugmentedboneinaugmentedsites,butgraftedsitedexperiencedbonelossinagreaterextentthanaugmentedsites[ 71].

    Anhistologicalanimalstudyfoundthatbuccalboneaugmentationwithaxenograftfailedtopreventthephysiologicalbonemodelingandremodelingtakingpartinthebuccalandlingualbonywalls;however,theinsertionof graftingmaterialseemedto promotedenovohardtissueformation,thuslimitingthetotalbonevolumecontraction[57].Xenograftparticlespositionedonthebuccalsurfaceoftheextractionalveoluswerefoundtobeencapsulatedincollagenfibersafter3monthsofhealing.Theywerealwayslocatedlateraltotheperiosteumofth

    buccalwalland,therefore,didnotparticipatetoridgeaugmentation[57].Ficklandcoworkersalsoproposedtheoverbuildingofthebuccabonewithaxenograftandamembrane.Datafromtheirstudies indicatesthatextrasocketgraftingdoesnotseemto compensateforridgalterationafterextractionpossiblybecauseoftheadditionaltraumatobuccaltissues[72,73].

    4.2.2.FreeSoft-TissueGraftsoverGraftedSockets

    Theplacement of free soft-tissue graft to cover the augmented alveolar socket was introduced to minimize the soft tissue shrinkageoptimize aestheticalresultsofimplant restoration,andobtaina primaryclosurethatmay preservethegraftfrombacterialinfections andsecondary graft failure [74, 75]. The first attempt to cover the socket graftwith an autogenous soft tissue implantwas described byLandsbergandBichachoin1994[76].NevinsandMellonigsuggestedtheuseofsofttissuegraftstoimproveridgetopographyaftertoothextraction[77]andincombinationwithimmediateimplantplacement[78].

    In1999,Taldescribedthesurvivalof circularconnectivetissuegraftsplacedoverextractionsocketstreatedeitherwithDFDBAorBio-OssTheyfoundthatthesurvivalwasnotdependentontheadoptedgraftandthatat1week18/42graftswerevital,13/42werepartiallyvital,and11/42werenonvital.Completeclosureofallsocketsoccurred4weekspostextraction.Theauthorsnotedthatmoreoftenpartiallyvitalgraft

    maintainedtheirvitalityoverthesocketareamorethanonthegraftmargins;theyconcludedthatthenourishmentcouldbeoriginatedfromplasmaticelementsinthesocketbloodclotmorethanfromvesselsoriginatingfromtheperipheryofthegraft[79].

    4.3.ImmediateImplantPlacementandtheJumpingDistance.

    The first report ofimplantplacement immediatelyaftertoothextractiondatesback to1978when theTbingenimmediateimplantwadescribed[8082].In1991,Barzilayetal.suggestedthatimmediateimplantplacementmightreduceoreliminatealveolarridgeresorptionduring the initial healingof the alveolar extractionsocket [83]. In two subsequent papers in amonkeymodel, he demonstrated thasubstantiallylessridgeremodelingwasinducedintheimmediateimplantgroup[ 84]andthathistologicallybonetoimplant contactwasimilarwithinthedifferentanatomicregionsoftheoralcavity[85].

    OtherauthorschallengedtheresultsoftheCanadianreportingthattheplacementofanimplantinthefreshextractionsitefailedtopreventhe remodelingthat occurred in thewallsof thesocket.Theheightofthebuccal andlingualwallsat3monthswas similarcompared toextractiononlysites[8690].Verticalbonelosswasmorepronouncedatthebuccalaspectevenwithsomemarginallossofosseointegration[87].Histologically, thegapbetweentheimplant andthesocketwallsfilledinat4 weekswithwovenbone,while, thebuccal andlinguawallsunderwentmarkedsurfaceresorption.After12weeks,thebuccalcrestwaslocated>2 mmapicaloftheimplantmargin[88](Figure2)Evaluatingimmediatelyplacedimplants,Schroppetal.reported70%ofthe3-wallinfrabonydefectswithaparallelwidthofupto5 mm,depth ofmaximum4mm,and aperpendicular widthofmaximum2 mmhada capacityof spontaneoushealingwithina period of 3months[18]. Botticelli et al. found that11.25mm wideand 5mmdeep defectsaround implantshealed uneventfullywith orwithoumembrane[91].Defectsupto2.25mmwidewerefoundtohealusingbarriermembranes,althoughwhenthebuccalbonewasintentionallyremoved,lessregenerationatthebuccalaspectswasobserved[92].Thesestudiesadoptedananimalmodelwithsurgicallycreateddefectswhichtypicallyexhibitlesserresorptionthanextractionsockets[90].

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B86http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B88http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B87http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B18http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig2/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B84http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B83http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B86http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B82http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B81http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B80http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B79http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B78http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B76http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B75http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B74http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B73http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B72http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B71http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B70http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B69http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B68http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B67http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B66http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B65http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B59http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B64http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B62http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B58
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    5/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 5

    Figure2:Healingof theextractionsocket,with postextractive implantplacement,withandwithoutsocketgrafting.Aftertoothextractionandimmediateimplantplacement,thebloodclotfillstheremainingspaceandthebundleboneundergoesthephysiologicalchanges.Whengraftingmaterialisplacedaroundtheimplantsurface,fillingtheremainingsocketarea,thebuccalbonewallremodelingprocessiscorrupted,thusleadingthemaintenanceofthehorizontalridgevolume.

    When immediateimplantplacement isadopted,manycliniciansfeeltheneedof filling thebuccal gap (i)by placingalargerdiameteimplant,(ii)byplacingtheimplantinamorebuccalposition,or(iii)bygraftingthebuccaldefectwithsomekindofbonesubstitutesGiven theavailableliterature,the firsttwo strategiesdonotseemtoberecommendable. Itseemsinsteadthatthepresenceofalarge gap

    betweenthebuccalwallandtheimplantapparentlypromotesnewboneformationandenhancesthelevelofbone-to-implantcontact[ 88].

    An implant position 0.8mmdeeper andmore lingual in relation to the center of the socket results in a lesser degree of buccal bondehiscence[93].Otherstudiesdemonstratedthattheclosertheimplantisto thebuccalbonyplate,themorethe buccalboneresorbs[9495].Bone resorptionof the buccalcrestismorepronouncedwhenplacing large size(5mm) root-formed implantswhen compared tocylindricalimplantswithasmallerdiameter(3.3mm)demonstratingthatimplantsplacedimmediatelyaftertoothextractionfailtopreservthealveolarcrestofthe socketirrespectiveof theirdesign orconfiguration[96].Moreover,softtissuesfollowedbonelevelsand alsotheywerelocatedmoreapicalonlargesizeimplantscomparedtosmallersizeimplants[ 97].

    Canevaetal.evaluatedtheuseofacollagenmembraneoverthebuccalgapofimmediatelyplacedimplantsandfoundthatthealveolarcresoutlinewasbettermaintainedatthetestsitescomparedwiththecontrolsitesevenifthebuccalgapwasrelativelysmall[ 98].Interestinglyenhancedbonepreservationwasfoundwhen usingdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral particlesand acollagenmembranecomparedtocontrolswhereasno suchbenefitwasnotedwhenusing magnesium-enrichedhydroxyapatite[99101]. RecentlyArajo and coworkerhaveevaluatedtheuseofBio-OssCollageninthevolumebetweenthebuccalwallandtheimplantincasestreatedwithimmediateimplan

    placementin anexperimentalanimalmodel.Theauthorsfound thatthis treatmentmodified theprocessofhardtissuehealing,providedadditional amountsof hard tissue atthe entranceof the previous socket,improved the level ofmarginal bone-to-implantcontact, andpreventedsofttissuerecession[102](Figure2).

    Implants immediatelyplacedinto freshextractionsocketsareclassifiedasType1 implants, earlyplacedimplants (48weeks) followingtoothextractionareType2implants,Type3implantsrepresentimplantsearlyplaced(1216weeks)inasocketwithpartialbonehealingandType4implantsaredelayedimplantsplacedinafullyhealededentuloussite(>6month)[ 103].Timingofimplantplacementisnotatopictobetreatedin thisreviewbut itmightbeofinterest tothereader thatbonegrafting inearlyplacedimplants(Type2-3)seemstoprovidebetterhardtissuedimensionsandwithlesspostoperativecomplicationsthanbonegraftingindelayedimplants(Type4)[104].

    Whenevaluatingtheexpressionofosteogenesis-relatedgrowthfactors,Linetal.demonstratedapparenttissuematurationdelayedduringosseointegration, compared to extraction socket bone repair. The two healing models developed distinct features and triggeredcharacteristic coordinated expression and orchestration of transcription factors, growth factors, extracellular matrix molecules, andchemokines. These groundbreaking findings open new horizons to researchers, which might lead to a better understanding of th

    cooperativemoleculardynamicsinalveolarbonehealing[105].4.4.RidgePreservationwithNonmineralizedGrafts

    Serinoetal.evaluatedtheuseofabioabsorbablepolylactide-polyglycolideacidspongeasaridgepreservationgraftingmaterial.Thegraftingmaterialwas placed with no attempt to achieveprimary intention wound closure. 6months following the extractions, biopsies werharvested. Both test and control extractionsockets showedmature andwell-structured bone with no residual particles of the graftedmaterial.Clinicalmeasuresseemedtofavorthetestgroup[106].Inafollowingstudy,boththeregeneratedsitesandcontrolsresultedinthformationofahighlymineralizedandwell-structuredbonewiththe controlgroupshowingaslightlyminorpercentageofmineralizedbone and ahigherpresenceof connective tissue in the coronalportion of the biopsies.Particles of the graftedmaterial couldnotbidentifiedinanyofthebiopsies[107].

    Graftingmaterials with high resorption rates allow for the formation of bonewith no residual graft particles at the time of implanplacementandloadingbuttheirabilitytosustainalveolarridgevolumeinthelongtermmightbeinferiortothatofmineralizedgrafts.

    4.5.NovelTissueEngineeringApproachesInordertoovercomethelimitationsofroutinelyadoptedbiomaterialsasallografts,xenografts,andalloplastsintermsofpredictabilityandqualityofboneformationandabilitytosustainalveolarridgemorphologyover longperiodsof time,noveltissueengineering therapiehavebeendevelopedincludingthedeliveryofgrowthfactorsincorporatedincarriers,thestimulationoftheselectiveproductionofgrowthfactorsusinggenetherapy,andthedeliveryofexpandedcellularconstructs.

    Bonemorphogenicproteins(BMPs)areanexampleofgrowthfactors;theyhavetheabilityofinducingthedifferentiationofthehoststemcellsintoboneformingcellsinaprocessknownas osteoinduction[108].A feasibilitystudyintroducingtheuseofrhBMP-2absorbedincollagenspongefor alveolarridgepreservationaftertoothextractionwaspublished in1997.Howellet al.demonstratedthesafetyofthigraftingmaterial.Patients receiving socketgraftingdemonstrated increase inboneheightwhilepatientsreceiving aridgeaugmentationprocedure showed no evidence of augmented ridge width or height [109]. Implants placed in the regenerated bone were stable andpresentedhealthyperiimplanttissues[110].Afterthispilotstudy,Fioreliniandcoworkersperformedarandomizedclinicaltrialtestingthregenerative potential of the recombinant BMP-2 in the collagen sponge compared to the useof the collagen sponge alone.Anteriomaxillarypostextractionalveolardefectsinwhichmorethan50%ofthealveolarbuccalbonehadbeenlostpriortoextractionweretreated

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B106http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B105http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B104http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B103http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B102http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B101http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B100http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B99http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig2/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B98http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B97http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B95http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B94http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B93http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B92http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B91http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B90http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B89http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B84http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig2/
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    6/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 6

    witheitherof the twograftingmaterial.Twodifferent rhBMP-2concentrationswereused(0.75mg/mL and1.50mg/mL).Significantlygreater augmentationwas noted in the 1.50mg/mL group and both rhBMP-2 groups outperformed the control groups. Histologicafindingsshowedgenerationofbonenodifferentfromnativebone[111].

    PDGF-BBina-TCPcarrierisamaterialacceptedfromtheFDAforregenerationofboneandPDLelementsinguidedtissueregenerationprocedures.Nevinsetal. evaluatedtheuseof therecombinantprotein in socketgrafting. Inthis case,series8extraction socketsreceivedBio-OssCollagenhydratedwith0.3 mg/mLPDGF-BB,andflapswerereleasedforclosurebyprimaryintention.Then4or6monthsaftergraftingbonecore,biopsiesrevealedrobustboneformation.Also %newboneand residual graftingmaterialwerenoted at 4 months. However, % new bone and % residual grafting material were noted at 6 months in thehystomorphometricalevaluation[112].Morerecently,tissuerepair cells(TRC), acellconstructderived fromeachpatientsbonemarrowandcultivatedusingautomatedbioreactorstoconcentrationsnotachievablethroughasimplebonemarrowaspiration,wereevaluatedinsockethealing.Thisstudyshowedthatthiscellconstructisabletoproducesignificantconcentrationsofcytokinesandmaintainsthecellsability to differentiate toward both the mesenchymaland endothelial pathway andproduceangiogenic factors. TRC therapy enhancedformationof highly vascularmature bone asearlyas 6weeksafter implantationwhen compared toguided boneregeneration withnoseriousstudy-relatedadverseeventreportedandlowerdegreesofalveolarridgeresorptionwerenoted[113,114].Pleaserefertoourrecenreviewforfurtherinformationoncelltherapyapplicationsincraniofacialregeneration[115].

    5.Conclusions

    Postextractionalveolarridgeresorptionisaninevitableprocessandthemolarareaisnotanexception.Molarridgespresenthigherdegreeof resorptionthan premolarareas do.Socket grafting techniqueshave been readily adopted bydentists throughout the world.A greaamountofresearchhasbeenconductedtoexaminetheeffectivenessofseveralmaterialsormembranes.

    Theuseof invasivetechniques ishardly recommendedat thistreatment timepointas anyprocedure requiringprimary intentionhealingwiththe advancementof flapsmay result in increased inflammatory response,in adecrease in vestibulardepth,and in the creationounaestheticscars.Evenexpertpractitionersmightnotbeableto accuratelydeterminewhenthesetechniquesmightbeindicated[69].Fotheverysamereason,lessinvasivegraftingtechniquesshouldbeadoptedwhenindicatedespeciallywhentreatingdefectsintheestheticormolarareas.Itshouldbeunderstoodthattheuseofosteoconductive-mineralizedgraftsdoesnotacceleratebonehealing,butmayallowfoabetterpreservationoftheridgevolumethatishighlydesirableforbothestheticandfunctionofthefutureimplantrestoration.Moreoveinvasiveproceduresasguidedboneregenerationandsinusfloorelevationarelessfrequentlyneededwhensocketgraftingisadopted[ 63]Formorepredictableresults,itisrecommendedtoallowpropertimeforbonehealingpriortoproceedwithimplantplacement.Anyway,whenimmediateimplantplacementisadopted,theuseofmineralizedgraftsonthebuccalgaphelpsreducingtheresorptionofthebuccalcrestbone[102]and maylessenthechances forundesirablehardand soft tissuerecessions.Clinicians shouldescape the temptationoplacinglargerdiameterimplantsorplacingtheimplantinamorebuccalpositioninordertofillthebuccalgap.Instead,alargergapshouldbepreservedandthebuccaldefectshouldbefilledwithbonesubstitutes.

    Therationaleforafranklypalatal/lingualpositioningofimmediatelyplacedimplantsisalsosupportedbytheknowledgethatsignificantlymorefacialrecessionsarecorrelatedwithimplantsplacedtoobuccal[ 116,117].

    Advancesintissue engineeringtechniquesmightsoonprovidepractitionerswithbiomaterials foramorepredictable andenhancedboneformationthatwill definitely improveourclinical results.Thesenovel biomaterials arecurrently evaluatedworldwide andwillsoonbeintroducedineverydaypractice.

    Practitionersshouldbewellinformedofthebiologicalcharacteristicsofnewbiomaterialsandonwhichstagesofwoundhealingmaytheytakeanaction.

    Thispaperattemptedtosummarizetheconceptsonsocketgraftingresultingfromtheavailableliterature.Currentknowledgemaystillbeinsufficienttofullyjustifytheuseofcertaintechniquesineverydaypractice,andmorestudiesevaluatingbasicbiologicalconceptsshouldbeperformed.

    Insocketgraftingasinothermedicaldivisions,properdiagnosisisoftenmoreimportantthantherenderedtreatment.

    References

    1. M.H.Cryer,TheInternalAnatomyoftheFace,Lea&Febiger,Philadelphia,Pa,USA,2ndedition,1916.

    2. W. Rogers and E. Applebaum,Changes in the mandible following closureof the bite with particular reference to edentuloupatients,JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation,vol.28,p.1573,1941.

    3. J.PietrokovskiandM.Massler,Ridgeremodelingaftertoothextractioninrats,JournalofDentalResearch,vol.46,no.1,pp.222231,1967.ViewatScopus

    4. P.J. Boyne,Osseousrepairofthepostextractionalveolusinman,OralSurgery,OralMedicine,OralPathology,vol.21,no.6,pp805813,1966.ViewatScopus

    5. Y.D.Hsieh,H.Devlin,andC.Roberts,Early alveolarridge osteogenesisfollowingtoothextractioninthe rat,Archives ofOraBiology,vol.39,no.5,pp.425428,1994.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    6. H.DevlinandP.Sloan,Earlybonehealingeventsin thehumanextractionsocket,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacia

    http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028432767&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=3ab66a8f7fd4af51942b5283dbb89b90http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90173-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90173-2http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0013919434&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a5466b26d0a9c44554c794f1c8209cb9http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014040617&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=c363b539d3a677249c708df0b9576e14http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B113http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B112http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B98http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B59http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B65http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B111http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B110http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B109http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B108http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B107
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    7/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 7

    Surgery,vol.31,no.6,pp.641645,2002.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    7. G.E. CarlssonandG.Persson, Morphologic changes of themandibleafter extraction andwearing ofdentures.A longitudinalclinical,andx-raycephalometricstudycovering5years,OdontologiskRevy,vol.18,no.1,pp.2754,1967.ViewatScopus

    8. A.Ashman,Postextractionridgepreservationusingasyntheticalloplast,ImplantDentistry,vol.9,no.2,pp.168176,2000.ViewatScopus

    9. J.PietrokovskiandM.Massler,Alveolarridgeresorptionfollowingtoothextraction,TheJournalof ProstheticDentistry,vol.17no.1,pp.2127,1967.ViewatScopus

    10. M.G.AraujoandJ.Lindhe,Dimensionalridgealterationsfollowingtoothextraction.Anexperimentalstudyinthedog,Journalof

    ClinicalPeriodontology,vol.32,no.2,pp.212218,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    11. G.Huynh-Ba,B. E.Pjetursson,M.Sanz et al., Analysis of the socket bonewall dimensions in the upper maxillain relation toimmediateimplantplacement,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.1,pp.3742,2010.ViewatPublisher ViewatGooglScholarViewatScopus

    12. P. R. Ramakrishnan, W. L. Lin, J. Sodek, and M. I. Cho, Synthesis of noncollagenous extracellular matrix proteins durindevelopmentofmineralizednodulesbyratperiodontalligamentcellsinvitro,CalcifiedTissueInternational,vol.57,no.1,pp.5259,1995.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    13. M.I.Cho,N.Matsuda,W.L.Lin,A.Moshier,andP.R.Ramakrishnan,Invitroformationofmineralizednodulesbyperiodontaligament cells fromthe rat,Calcified TissueInternational,vol.50,no.5,pp.459467,1992. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    14. G.G. Steiner,W. Francis, R. Burrell,M.P. Kallet, D.M. Steiner, and R.Macias, The healing socketand socket regeneration,

    CompendiumofContinuingEducationinDentistry,vol.29,no.2,pp.114124,2008.

    15. G.Cardaropoli, M.Arajo,R.Hayacibara, F.Sukekava, and J. Lindhe,Healing ofextractionsockets and surgicallyproducedaugmentedandnon-augmenteddefectsinthealveolarridge.Anexperimentalstudyinthedog,JournalofClinicalPeriodontologyvol.32,no.5,pp.435440,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    16. L.P.Garetto, J.Chen,J.A.Parr, andW.E.Roberts,Remodelingdynamicsofbonesupportingrigidlyfixedtitaniumimplants:histomorphometric comparison in fourspecies includinghumans, Implantdentistry, vol. 4,no.4, pp. 235243, 1995. View aScopus

    17. K.Johnson,Astudyofthedimensionalchangesoccurringinthemaxillafollowingtoothextraction,AustralianDentalJournal,vol14,no.4,pp.241244,1969.ViewatScopus

    18. L.Schropp,L.Kostopoulos,andA.Wenzel,Bonehealingfollowingimmediateversusdelayedplacementoftitaniumimplantsintoextractionsockets:aprospectiveclinicalstudy,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplants,vol.18,no.2,pp.189199

    2003.ViewatScopus

    19. C.H.Hammerle,M.G.Araujo,andM.Simion,Evidence-basedknowledgeon thebiology and treatmentofextractionsockets,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.23,supplement5,pp.8082,2012.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar

    20. L. Schropp, A.Wenzel, L.Kostopoulos, and T. Karring, Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-toothextraction:aclinicalandradiographic12-monthprospectivestudy,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistryvol.23,no.4,pp.313323,2003.ViewatScopus

    21. W.L.Tan,T.L.T.Wong,M.C.M.Wong,andN. P.Lang,Asystematic reviewofpost-extractionalalveolarhardandsofttissudimensionalchangesinhumans,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.23,supplement5,pp.121,2012.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholar

    22. A.Ashman,Ridgepreservation: importantbuzzwordsin dentistry,GeneralDentistry,vol.48,no.3,pp.304312,2000.ViewaScopus

    23. M.H.Amler,Thetimesequenceoftissueregenerationinhumanextractionwounds,OralSurgery,OralMedicine,OralPathologyvol.27,no.3,pp.309318,1969.ViewatScopus

    24. J.G.Mangos,Thehealingofextractionwounds:amicroscopicandridographicinvestigation,NewZeelandDentalJournal,vol.37pp.423,1941.

    25. L.Trombelli,R.Farina,A.Marzola,L.Bozzi,B.Liljenberg,andJ. Lindhe,Modelingandremodelingof humanextractionsockets,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.35,no.7,pp.630639,2008.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    26. R.S.Clafin,Healingofdisturbedandundisturbedextractionwounds,JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation,vol.23,pp.945959,1936.

    27. J.P.WeinmannandH.Sicher,BoneandBones,2ndedition,1955.

    28. M.H.Amler, P. L. Johnson, and I. Salman, Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in

    http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-44949208338&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=f8b0cb29a4b3bf9b4017fcf3d093ef71http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014483772&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=452c3298f3d9589f316060346264ed2chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034188258&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e9892ec4f9d8e82264019e455ba402dfhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0141627791&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=7328e573256417aa01f145e3b011b58dhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038749490&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=f6fbc5e559950993736a90904b89f316http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014561367&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=72fa730e7dfabc437b68c2e8e94e5f1chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029439224&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=cec9235b469163a29b1fc7c4cff5db5dhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18244375859&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9270842f6559639155109ee873879ce6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00692.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00692.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026708957&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ad303a2b44f02356ddab8cbd772cfc4ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00296778http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00296778http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029019746&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1fd0c137bbca5dcd943cd9c4cf87fb66http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00298997http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00298997http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949085306&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=7c24d155236c502c4dc1f31e026214a9http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-14844286171&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1427489b7dfd4596fb14bb5d482fa09ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014040885&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=413e1593b5a5308b4322d2d5889d3e31http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034571526&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a65796981c89b2ce18daa2dfb947e6achttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014041792&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=41c01f718042aa81141e39de759586cchttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036911143&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=633d5f81768cd38b8f91cc506ec0f345http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0292http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0292
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    8/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 8

    undisturbedextractionwounds,JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation,vol.61,pp.3244,1960.

    29. C.I. Evian,E.S.Rosenberg,J.G.Coslet,andH.Corn,Theosteogenicactivityofboneremovedfromhealingextractionsocketsinhumans,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.53,no.2,pp.8185,1982.ViewatScopus

    30. G.Cardaropoli,M. Arajo,andJ. Lindhe,Dynamicsofbonetissueformation intoothextractionsites:an experimentalstudyindogs,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.30,no.9,pp.809818,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar

    31. S.Fickl,O.Zuhr,H.Wachtel,W.Bolz,andM.Huerzeler,Tissuealterationsaftertoothextractionwithandwithoutsurgicaltraumaavolumetricstudyinthebeagledog,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.35,no.4,pp.356363,2008. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    32. S.Fickl,O.Zuhr,H.Wachtel,W.Bolz,andM.B.Huerzeler,Hardtissuealterationsaftersocketpreservation:anexperimentalstudyinthebeagledog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.19,no.11,pp.11111118,2008.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    33. J.Blanco,V.Nuez,L.Aracil,F.Muoz,andI.Ramos,Ridgealterationsfollowingimmediateimplantplacementinthedog:flapversusflaplesssurgery,Journal ofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.35,no.7,pp.640648,2008. ViewatPublisher View atGooglScholarViewatScopus

    34. M.G.ArajoandJ.Lindhe,Ridgealterationsfollowingtoothextractionwithandwithout flapelevation:anexperimentalstudy inthedog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.20,no.6,pp.545549,2009.ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholar ViewaScopus

    35. F.Vignoletti, P.Matesanz,D.Rodrigo,E. Figuero,C.Martin, andM.Sanz, Surgicalprotocolsfor ridgepreservationaftertoothextraction.Asystematicreview,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.23,supplement5,pp.2238,2012.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholar

    36. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,L.A. Salata,S. L.S. Souza,E. Bressan,andN.P.Lang,Flapvs.flaplesssurgicalapproach atimmediatimplants: ahistomorphometric study in dogs, ClinicalOral Implants Research, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 13141319, 2010. View aPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    37. A.H.Melcher,Woundhealinginmonkey(Macacairus)mandible: effectof elevatingperiosteumonformationof subperiosteacallus,ArchivesofOralBiology,vol.16,no.4,pp.461IN19,1971.ViewatScopus

    38. A.H.Melcher,Roleoftheperiosteuminrepairofwoundsoftheparietalboneoftherat,ArchivesofOralBiology,vol.14,no.9pp.1101IN23,1969.ViewatScopus

    39. A.H.Melcher,Ontherepairpotentialofperiodontaltissues,Journalof Periodontology,vol.47,no.5,pp.256260,1976.ViewaScopus

    40. C.H.F.HmmerleandT.Karring,Guidedboneregenerationatoralimplantsites,Periodontology2000,vol.17,no.1,pp.151175

    1998.ViewatScopus

    41. U.M.Wikesj,R . E.Nilvus, andK.A. Selvig, Significance ofearlyhealingeventsonperiodontal repair: areview,Journal ofPeriodontology,vol.63,no.3,pp.158165,1992.ViewatScopus

    42. U.M.Wikesj,G. C.Bogle, andR. E.Nilvus, Periodontal repairin dogs: effect ofa composite graft protocol onhealing insupraalveolarperiodontaldefects,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.63,no.2,pp.107113,1992.ViewatScopus

    43. J.M.Haney,K.N.Leknes,T.Lie,K. A.Selvig,andU.M.Wikesj, Cementaltearrelatedtorapidperiodontalbreakdown:acasreport,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.63,no.3,pp.220224,1992.ViewatScopus

    44. V. Lekovic, E. B.Kenney, M.Weinlaender et al., Abone regenerative approach to alveolar ridgemaintenance following toothextraction.Reportof10cases,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.68,no.6,pp.563570,1997.ViewatScopus

    45. M.N.Pinho,V.M. Roriz,A. B.Novaes et al., Titaniummembranes inprevention ofalveolar collapse after toothextraction,

    ImplantDentistry,vol.15,no.1,pp.5361,2006.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus46. V. Lekovic,P. M. Camargo, P. R. Klokkevold et al., Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbabl

    membranes,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.69,no.9,pp.10441049,1998.ViewatScopus

    47. S. M. Luczyszyn, V. Papalexiou, A. B. Novaes, M. F. M. Grisi, S. L. S. Souza, and M. Taba, Acellular dermal matrix andhydroxyapatiteinpreventionofridgedeformitiesaftertoothextraction,ImplantDentistry,vol.14,no.2,pp.176184,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    48. R.Neiva, G.Pagni, F.Duarte et al.,Analysis of tissue neogenesisin extraction sockets treatedwithguided bone regenerationclinical,histologic,andmicro-CTresults,TheInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.31,no.5,pp.457469,2011.

    49. J. M. Lasella, H. Greenwell, R. L.Miller et al., Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and acollagen membrancomparedtoextractionaloneforimplantsitedevelopment:aclinicalandhistologicstudyinhumans,JournalofPeriodontology,vol

    http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-21344433661&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=974a5c2a85f881a59610bde03e3ac0e4http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000165082.77499.41http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000165082.77499.41http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032160402&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=76c69068aebb98120be4482fd7fdd467http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33646853317&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=b0859ebe498138bffe214a3cd2fdf3f6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202596.18254.e1http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202596.18254.e1http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031154703&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6513966985d2846b908ff1156a724dc4http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026824658&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a4f18e8b41d69fba87df5ceff8208358http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026811848&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=54e1abd30b8c6c3f3cb3fcd989dd7217http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026826632&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ce05edfb6093b0aa9e7f52397b86e7dbhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032081970&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=c22b9cada1c5a42119c7fd9976f2fcaehttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0016960221&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2844ff646ad7611b4120deee5beff573http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014576164&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e26fb65f898b12512c65a11c5b49b332http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0015047015&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6136f0c67f1a17e4a89b98d83ec61474http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78349291929&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=3c9efb9aff1cbc9cbb1a3c11e1b6b7e6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01959.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01959.xhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02331.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02331.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-65649108412&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ee022ccd60406614c16724aa7afa11c3http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-44849132690&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2fc73124dd13eb138d9530d27a0b4f9ehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01237.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01237.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-54249117728&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=de5ce81581b647f27a197114c89582cahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-40849142458&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=57cb8b5b409ab3a39da65154ce67ee6bhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01209.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01209.xhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0020096912&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=23183ea684c9c43eb0c573b19f668fe2
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    9/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 9

    74,no.7,pp.990999,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    50. S.Fickl,O.Zuhr,H.Wachtel,C.F.J.Stappert,J.M.Stein,andM.B.Hrzeler,Dimensionalchangesofthealveolarridgecontouafter different socket preservation techniques,Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 906913, 2008. View aPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    51. A.G.Sclar,Preservingalveolarridgeanatomyfollowingtoothremovalinconjunctionwithimmediateimplantplacement.TheBioColtechnique,AtlasoftheOralandMaxillofacialSurgeryClinicsofNorthAmerica,vol.7,no.2,pp.3959,1999.ViewatScopus

    52. C. E. Nemcovsky and V. Serfaty, Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 2consecutivecases,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.67,no.4,pp.390395,1996.ViewatScopus

    53. F.Brugnami,P.R.Then,H.Moroi,andC.W.Leone,Histologicevaluationofhumanextractionsocketstreatedwithdemineralizedfreeze-driedboneallograft(DFDBA)andcellocclusivemembrane, JournalofPeriodontology,vol.67,no.8,pp.821825,1996.ViewatScopus

    54. H.L.WangandY.P.Tsao,Mineralizedboneallograft-plugsocketaugmentation:rationaleandtechnique,ImplantDentistry,vol16,no.1,pp.3341,2007.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    55. Z.Artzi,H.Tal,andD.Dayan, Porous bovinebonemineralin healingof humanextractionsockets.Part 1:histomorphometricevaluationsat9months,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.71,no.6,pp.10151023,2000.ViewatScopus

    56. Z.Artzi,H.Tal,andD.Dayan,Porousbovinebonemineralinhealingofhumanextractionsockets:2.Histochemicalobservationat9months,Journal of Periodontology,vol.72,no.2,pp.152159,2001. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholar View aScopus

    57. M.Arajo, E. Linder, J.Wennstrm, and J. Lindhe, The influence of Bio-Oss collagen onhealingof an extraction socket: an

    experimentalstudyinthedog,International Journal ofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.28,no.2,pp.123135,2008.ViewatScopus

    58. M.Arajo,E. Linder,andJ. Lindhe, Effectofaxenograftonearlyboneformationinextractionsockets:anexperimentalstudyindog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.20,no.1,pp.16,2009.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    59. D.T.Luttikhuizen,M.C.Harmsen,andM.J.A.VanLuyn,Cellularandmoleculardynamicsintheforeignbodyreaction,TissueEngineering,vol.12,no.7,pp.19551970,2006.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    60. W.Becker,C.Clokie,L. Sennerby,M.R.Urist, andB.E.Becker,Histologicfindingsafterimplantationandevaluationofdifferengraftingmaterialsandtitaniummicroscrewsintoextractionsockets:casereports,Journalof Periodontology,vol.69,no.4,pp.414421,1998.ViewatScopus

    61. H.L.WangandY.P.Tsao,Histologic evaluationofsocketaugmentationwithmineralizedhumanallograft,InternationalJournaofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.28,no.3,pp.231237,2008.ViewatScopus

    62. A.Mordenfeld, M.Hallman, C.B. Johansson, and T.Albrektsson, Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsieharvested11yearsaftermaxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithdeproteinizedbovineandautogenousbone,ClinicalOralImplantResearch,vol.21,no.9,pp.961970,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    63. G.Rasperini, L.Canullo,C.Dellavia,G. Pellegrini, andM.Simion,Socket grafting in theposteriormaxilla reduces theneed fosinusaugmentation,TheInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.30,no.3,pp.265273,2010. ViewaScopus

    64. E.De Santis,D. Botticelli, F. Pantani, F. P. Pereira, M.Beolchini, andN. P. Lang, Bone regeneration at implantsplaced intoextractionsocketsofmaxillaryincisorsindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.22,no.4,pp.430437,2011.ViewatPublisheViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    65. J. P. Fiorellini, D. M. Kim, Y. Nakajima, and H. P. Weber, Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bonregenerationusingexpandedpolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneandvariousbonefillers,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsand

    RestorativeDentistry,vol.27,no.3,pp.287294,2007.ViewatScopus

    66. D.Carmagnola,P.Adriaens, andT.Berglundh,Healingofhumanextractionsockets filledwithBio-Oss,ClinicalOralImplantResearch,vol.14,no.2,pp.137143,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    67. L.Molly,H.Vandromme,M.Quirynen,E.Schepers,J. L.Adams,andD.VanSteenberghe,Boneformationfollowingimplantationofbonebiomaterialsintoextractionsites,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.79,no.6,pp.11081115,2008.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    68. J.P.FiorelliniandM.L.Nevins, Localizedridgeaugmentation/preservation.Asystematicreview,AnnalsofPeriodontology,vol.8no.1,pp.321327,2003.ViewatScopus

    69. M.Nevins,M.Camelo,S.DePaolietal.,Astudyofthefateofthebuccalwallofextractionsocketsofteethwithprominentroots,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.26,no.1,pp.1929,2006.ViewatScopus

    http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31944441424&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=95eca9c38582460aaaef81bcdb5e5b33http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1442302978&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=979de092656a42a05c94bd0ab159812chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-46049111495&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e9d7e5d7998694e64063627cd8f33315http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070476http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070476http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037822215&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=bb69f88f476b53ca596cd54049ae0adbhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34250194654&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=85e10b2924f8395e06535e4c6c4f31b3http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952520030&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6401039fa369de572ff08877747c3ffehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77956042127&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ef6db4b9938f7db1121d5c0f88b4276chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955396545&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=31f242fad6ae796115f78744bef87260http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01939.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01939.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-46149127359&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=12fed0ac3aac9fd469a1374f5baf127dhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032044251&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2e5c6b1661ac8ea7406b09c8aadfc9behttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33746676842&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=82a9cecf8587dbc787d3c8ec898c347ehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1955http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1955http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-58149161369&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=5022b7af4d6efef82e6c0f902e7684ebhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01606.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01606.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-42249098425&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6ea67d1c742cd7ecee1743f5714b35b0http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035258433&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=688b20839774be76b713df033e9f72e9http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.152http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.152http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034201564&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2839f44ae77bf520b996ffd7cea62a43http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34247589666&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=c92c1a959def9c0027ec5525403f1aachttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318031ece6http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318031ece6http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030202656&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=549065ac532852d2ff61a6ec9eb1c5b7http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030122043&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=4a9a7204a8a7342c64f9c41273003b1ahttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033200449&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=0b6614e228c853230858dbdb615aacb6http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-51749095706&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9691a011c0f6af801116576d66e3ea22http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0042924331&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e24a64da0bc88f9a5ecde81109b7fb09http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    10/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 10

    70. B.I. Simon,S.VonHagen,M.J.Deasy,M. Faldu,andD.Resnansky,Changesinalveolarboneheightandwidthfollowingridgaugmentationusingbonegraftandmembranes, JournalofPeriodontology,vol.71,no.11,pp.17741791,2000.ViewatScopus

    71. G.Zubillaga,S.VonHagen,B.I.Simon,andM.J.Deasy,Changesinalveolarboneheightandwidthfollowingpost-extractionridgeaugmentation using a fixed bioabsorbable membrane and demineralized freeze-dried bone osteoinductive graft, Journal ofPeriodontology,vol.74,no.7,pp.965975,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    72. S.Fickl,O. Zuhr,H.Wachtel,M.Kebschull,andM.B.Hrzeler, Hardtissuealterationsaftersocketpreservationwith additionabuccal overbuilding: astudy in the beagledog,Journal ofClinicalPeriodontology, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 898904, 2009. View aPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    73. S.Fickl,D.Schneider,O.Zuhretal.,Dimensionalchangesoftheridgecontouraftersocketpreservationandbuccaloverbuilding:ananimalstudy,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.36,no.5,pp.442448,2009.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    74. M.Stimmelmayer,E.P.Allen,T.E.Reichert,andG.Iglhaut,Useofacombinationepithelized-subepithelialconnectivetissuegrafforclosureandsofttissueaugmentationof an extractionsite followingridgepreservationorimplantplacement:descriptionoftechnique,TheInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.30,no.4,pp.375381,2010.ViewatScopus

    75. T.Thalmair,M.Hinze,W.Bolz,andH.Wachtel,Thehealingof freegingivalautograftsforsocket-sealsurgery:acasereport,ThEuropeanJournalofEstheticDentistry,vol.5,no.4,pp.358368,2010.ViewatScopus

    76. C.J.LandsbergandN.Bichacho,Amodifiedsurgical/prostheticapproachforoptimalsingleimplantsupportedcrown.PartIthesocketsealsurgery,PracticalPeriodonticsandAestheticDentistry,vol.6,no.2,pp.1119,1994.ViewatScopus

    77. M.Nevins and J. T.Mellonig, The advantages of localized ridge augmentationprior to implantplacement: astagedevent,ThInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.14,no.2,pp.96111,1994.ViewatScopus

    78. C.J. Landsberg,Socketsealsurgerycombinedwith immediateimplantplacement:anovelapproachforsingle-toothreplacement,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.17,no.2,pp.141149,1997.ViewatScopus

    79. H.Tal, Autogenousmasticatorymucosal graftsin extractionsocketseal procedures:a comparisonbetweensockets graftedwithdemineralizedfreeze-driedboneanddeproteinizedbovinebonemineral,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.10,no.4,pp.289296,1999.ViewatScopus

    80. W. Schulte,H. Kleineikenscheidt, K.Lindner, andR. Schareyka, TheTubingen immediate implantin clinical studies,DeutschzahnarztlicheZeitschrift,vol.33,no.5,pp.348859,1978.

    81. W.Schulte,H.Kleineikenscheidt,R. Schareyka,andG.Heimke,ConceptandtestingoftheTubingenimmediateimplant,DeutschzahnarztlicheZeitschrift,vol.33,no.5,pp.319325,1978.

    82. W.Schulte,H.Kleineikenscheidt,K.Lindneretal.,AnimalexperimentsonthequestionofhealingaroundtheTbingenimmediat

    implant,DeutschezahnarztlicheZeitschrift,vol.33,no.5,pp.326331,1978.

    83. I.Barzilay,G.N.Graser,B. Iranpour, and J.R.Natiella, Immediate implantation ofapuretitaniumimplant intoanextractionsocket:reportofapilotprocedure,TheInternationalJournalofOral&MaxillofacialImplants,vol.6,no.3,pp.277284,1991.ViewatScopus

    84. I.Barzilay,G.N.Graser,B.Iranpour,andH.M.Proskin,ImmediateimplantationofpuretitaniumimplantsintoextractionsocketofMacacafascicularispartI:clinicalandradiographicassessment,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplants,vol.11no.3,pp.299310,1996.ViewatScopus

    85. I.Barzilay,G.N.Graser,B. Iranpour, J.R. Natiella, andH.M.Proskin, Immediate implantationof puretitanium implants intoextractionsocketsofMacacafascicularis.PartII:histologicobservations, InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplantsvol.11,no.4,pp.489497,1996.ViewatScopus

    86. D.Botticelli, T. Berglundh, and J. Lindhe, Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implantplacement in extractionsites,

    JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.31,no.10,pp.820828,2004.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    87. M.G.Arajo, F.Sukekava, J. L.Wennstrm, and J.Lindhe, Ridge alterations following implant placementin fresh extractionsockets:anexperimentalstudyinthedog,Journalof ClinicalPeriodontology,vol.32,no.6,pp.645652,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    88. M.G.Arajo, F. Sukekava, J. L.Wennstrm,and J.Lindhe, Tissuemodeling following implant placement in fresh extractionsockets,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.17,no.6,pp.615624,2006. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholar ViewaScopus

    89. M.G.Arajo,J. L.Wennstrm,and J. Lindhe,Modelingofthebuccalandlingual bonewallsof freshextractionsitesfollowingimplantinstallation,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.17,no.6,pp.606614,2006.ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    90. D.Botticelli, L. G.Persson, J. Lindhe, and T.Berglundh, Bone tissue formation adjacentto implantsplaced in fresh extraction

    http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33750729237&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e2fa1257f377a8f2e6c1a6c09625e994http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33750704585&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6e13cd373c5f38b8d74b821ab217b075http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-20344404942&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=70ebd1032f91c02bd3d1c349476df2bbhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-6344239043&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=cf0d5dcc3837d7cd3ce3505a1a54929ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030185374&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=875eb26b092f5a1ca10fd2e0594f2b5chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030147473&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a8798bd030e5af4c0bc8b59695a02360http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026218692&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=5f8829a912a3832ffea06dd9bab12ca9http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033177395&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=767e3f4776ce6c43354700867cc3c6c1http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031107627&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6849811d6d2e26b989ad24c5771075c3http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028412676&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=19466394953eda77112abb43e217edaahttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028403225&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ca8fcb6262868405a9067c078c97f61chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952277882&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9f3bba7eef50d011a3626f4b4a61f9d5http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77957273616&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a8298eade3867c99c6e92e1f0ffccf50http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-64849117985&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=178ccf328093f876e6cde3c6b7519de6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-70349148959&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=69bcd4eec948c94c05ce5270162eb78fhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01463.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01463.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0041421196&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=fb12f14d13fe4b79a68f3e1a8d4f2162http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.965http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.965http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034321819&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=5d0b7b8677576592c4bcc00d39f2b534
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    11/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 11

    sockets:anexperimentalstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.17,no.4,pp.351358,2006. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    91. D.Botticelli,T.Berglundh,D.Buser,andJ.Lindhe,Thejumpingdistancerevisited:anexperimentalstudyinthedog,ClinicalOraImplantsResearch ,vol.14,no.1,pp.3542,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    92. D. Botticelli,T. Berglundh, andJ. Lindhe, Resolutionof bone defects of varying dimensionand configuration inthemarginaportionoftheperi-implantbone:anexperimentalstudyinthedog, Journalof ClinicalPeriodontology,vol.31,no.4,pp.3093172004.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    93. M.Caneva,L.A.Salata, S.S.DeSouza,G.Baffone,N.P. Lang,andD.Botticelli,Influenceofimplantpositioning inextractionsocketson osseointegration:histomorphometricanalysesin dogs,

    ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.1,pp.4349,2010

    ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    94. M.Sanz,D.Cecchinato,J.Ferrus,E.B.Pjetursson,N.P.Lang,andJ.Lindhe,Aprospective,randomized-controlledclinicaltrialtoevaluatebone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in themaxilla,Clinical OraImplantsResearch ,vol.21,no.1,pp.1321,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    95. C.Tomasi,M.Sanz,D.Cecchinatoetal.,Bonedimensionalvariationsatimplantsplacedin freshextractionsockets:amultilevemultivariateanalysis,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.1,pp.3036,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    96. M.Caneva,L. A. Salata,S. S.deSouza,E.Bressan,D.Botticelli, andN. P. Lang,Hardtissue formationadjacent to implants ovarioussizeandconfiguration immediatelyplaced intoextractionsockets: anexperimental study in dogs,ClinicalOral ImplantResearch,vol.21,no.9,pp.885890,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    97. M. Caneva, D. Botticelli, F. Rossi, L.C. Cardoso, F. Pantani, and N.P. Lang, Influence of implants with different sizes andconfigurationsinstalledimmediatelyintoextractionsocketsonperi-implanthardandsoft tissues:anexperimentalstudy indogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.23,no.4,pp.396401,2012.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar

    98. M. Caneva, D. Botticelli, L. A. Salata, S. L. Scombatti Souza, L. CarvalhoCardoso, and N. P. Lang, Collagen membranes aimmediateimplants:ahistomorphometricstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.9,pp.891897,2010.ViewaPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    99. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,E.Stellini,S.L.S.Souza,L.A.Salata,andN.P.Lang,Magnesium-enrichedhydroxyapatiteatimmediatimplants:ahistomorphometricstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.22,no.5,pp.512517,2011.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    100. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,F.Morelli,G.Cesaretti,M.Beolchini,andN.P. Lang,Alveolarprocesspreservationatimplantsinstalledimmediatelyintoextractionsocketsusingdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral-anexperimentalstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantResearch.Inpress.

    101. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,F.Pantani,G.M.Baffone,I.G. Rangel,andN.P.Lang,Deproteinizedbovinebonemineralinmarginadefectsat implants installed immediately intoextractionsockets: an experimentalstudy indogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch2011.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    102. M.G.Arajo,E.Linder,andJ. Lindhe,Bio-OssCollageninthebuccalgapatimmediate implants:a6-monthstudyinthedog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.22,no.1,pp.18,2011.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    103. C.H. F.Hmmerle,S. T.Chen,andT.G.WilsonJr,Consensusstatements and recommendedclinicalproceduresregarding thplacementofimplantsinextractionsockets,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplants,vol.19,pp.2628,2004.ViewatScopus

    104. I.Sanz,M.Garcia-Gargallo,D.Herrera,C.Martin,E.Figuero,andM.Sanz,Surgicalprotocolsforearlyimplantplacementinpostextractionsockets:asystematicreview,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.23,supplement5,pp.6779,2012. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar

    105. Z.Lin,H. F.Rios, S. L.Volk, J.V. Sugai,Q.Jin, andW.V.Giannobile, Gene expression dynamicsduring bonehealing andosseointegration,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.82,no.7,pp.10071017,2011. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    106. G.Serino,S.Biancu,G. Iezzi,andA.Piattelli,Ridgepreservationfollowingtoothextractionusingapolylactideandpolyglycolidspongeasspacefiller:aclinicalandhistologicalstudyinhumans,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.14,no.5,pp.651658,2003ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    107. G.Serino,W.Rao,G.Iezzi,andA.Piattelli,Polylactideandpolyglycolidespongeusedinhumanextractionsockets:boneformationfollowing3monthsafteritsapplication,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.19,no.1,pp.2631,2008.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    108. S.E.Lynch,TissueEngineering:ApplicationsinOralandMaxillofacialSurgeryandPeriodontics,2ndedition,2008.

    http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-37249036000&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9ac0da38a4fbe2305ce8ea1050c9d577http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01311.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01311.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0344441917&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=43533ae779e60982c578ce52f1983602http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79960485509&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=b8d929e7d9d3f52994526e3a697e11edhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100577http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100577http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02339.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02339.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-12244312541&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ec278e4ff09622edd94e5006e7ca1546http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78650217933&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=80b3af17463d2ba9410254bfdab8b33bhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01920.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01920.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79955555631&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1d684564cc086e8605795a9ca877a4f1http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02202.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02202.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79953713968&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=0091d823a4ed13ec8656cabd86c206f8http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02040.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02040.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955360940&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a777f59c22da87692d08eda2a86efd10http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01946.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01946.xhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955351268&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=f58245591d348ce7c4becb1a09391106http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949090580&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=765096d1df0135264ed2ad0d7ae899b6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01848.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01848.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949111386&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1ea33936d6e42d3926f742d9ffccbdfahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01824.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01824.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949118511&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2f25042c56b59f7318387cdd98451212http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01842.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01842.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-2342508490&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=3cac32d210c460ed3b3fb004e9f1d090http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00502.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00502.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038284316&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=33ebc9b98e8aa7558ca552d55f06d098http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33746358173&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=77510de886f77a37c807f8ebabb339b7http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.x
  • 7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments

    12/12

    25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments

    109. T.H.Howell, J. Fiorellini, A. Jones et al., A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge device for locaalveolarridgepreservationoraugmentation,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.17,no.2,pp.125139,1997.ViewatScopus

    110. D.L. Cochran, A.A. Jones,L.C. Lilly, J. P. Fiorellini,andH.Howell,Evaluationof recombinanthumanbonemorphogenetiprotein-2 in oral applications including the use of endosseous implants: 3-year results of apilot study in humans,Journal ofPeriodontology,vol.71,no.8,pp.12411257,2000.ViewatScopus

    111. J. P. Fiorellini,T.HowardHowell, D.Cochran etal., Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetiprotein-2forextractionsocketaugmentation,Journalof Periodontology,vol.76,no.4,pp.605613,2005. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    112. M.L.Nevins,M.Camelo,P.Schupbach,D.M.Kim,J.M.B.Camelo,andM.Nevins,Humanhistologicevaluationofmineralizedcollagenbonesubstituteandrecombinantplatelet-derivedgrowthfactor-bbtocreateboneforimplantplacementinextractionsockedefectsat4and6months:acaseseries,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.29,no.2,pp.1291392009.ViewatScopus

    113. D.Kaigler,G.Pagni,A.Galloro,etal.,Accelerationofhumanoralosseousregenerationusingbonerepaircells,inProceedingsofthe39thAADRAnnualMeeting,Washington,DC,USA,2010.

    114. D.Kaigler,G.Pagni,C.H.Park,S.A.Tarle,R.L.Bartel,andW.V.Giannobile,Angiogenicandosteogenicpotentialofbonerepaicells forcraniofacialregeneration,TissueEngineeringA,vol.16,no.9,pp.28092820,2010.ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    115. G.Pagni,D.Kaigler,G.Rasperini,G.Avila-Ortiz,R.Bartel,andW.V.Giannobile,Bonerepaircellsforcraniofacialregeneration,AdvancedDrugDeliveryReviews.Inpress.

    116. S.T.Chen,I.B.Darby,andE.C.Reynolds,Aprospectiveclinicalstudyofnon-submergedimmediateimplants:clinicaloutcomeandestheticresults,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.18,no.5,pp.552562,2007. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus

    117. N.P. Lang,L.Pun,K.Y. Lau,K.Y.Li, andM.C.Wong, Asystematicreviewon survivaland success ratesof implantsplacedimmediatelyintofreshextractionsocketsafteratleast1year, ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.23,supplement5,pp.3966,2012ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar

    http:/