poster1
TRANSCRIPT
The Mouse Was Chased by the Hat:The Influence of Semantic Context on Phonetic Processing
Cristen SullivanDepartment of Psychology, Salem State University
The purpose of this experiment is to serve as a behavioral pilot study exploring the connection between semantic context and phonetic processing. Using a phonetic morphing algorithm we created pairs of phonetically ambiguous words, which have two possible interpretations. Participants listened to sentences that were biased towards a particular target word. (ex.. Her piano was never in TUNE vs. He climbs the DUNE). After hearing the sentence participants reported weather or not they heard a particular consonant (T vs D) in the sentence they just heard. This research posits that semantic context creates a bias towards context appropriate solutions when subjects interpret ambiguous stimuli in constraining compared to non constrained conditions.
Abstract
Semantic Influences on Speech Perception
Conclusions
Prospective Scanning Experiment
References
Subjects
Stimuli Task
Results
Borsky, S,Tuller, B, & Sharpio, L.P.(1998) “How to milk a coat:”The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 103(5),2670-2676.
Gow,D.W.(2012)The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: A dual lexicon model of spoken language processing.Brain and Language, 121, 273-288.
Gow,D.W, & Caplan, D.N. (2012) New levels of language processing complexity and organization revealed by granger causation. Frontiers In Psychology. 506, 1-11.
Warren,R,& Warren R. Auditory Illusions and Confusions. Scientific American,223, 30-36.
This work was supported by NICDC grant R013108 (PI David Gow) through a subcontract to Salem State University. My sincere thanks to Prof. Gow and A. Conrad Nied for their assistance with this work.
• This study was approved by Institutional Review Boards at Salem State University, Massachusetts General Hospital, and MIT.• 25 participants were used 4 male and 21 female. All participants were native speakers with no uncorrected auditory or visual
defects. • Task effects: more distractors eliminate participant memorization and predictability of the experiment.
• A clear effect was needed to justify running the prospective scanning experiment.
• Stimuli can be made stronger by eliminating the K target.
• The behavioral pilot test was conducted to determine that our test produces the most robust result.
• Granger causation MEG and EEG scanning. • Allows for causal interactions between brain regions
to be analyzed. • Does sentence context influence speech perception?• Warren and Warren (1970) observed that people tend to
utilize sentence context to interpret ambiguous speech.• Borsky (1997) , using goat or coat as target stimulus finds
participants are more likely to identify target words placed in contextually biased sentences. However only a small effect was noted.
• Top down and bottom up effects.• This experiment seeks to create a more robust effect towards
context biased stimuli and serves as a behavioral pilot test for a prospective brain scanning experiment.
Figure 2 from Borsky et al. (1998) JASA
P
Voiceless Voiced0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Consistent Inconsistent
Sentential/Semantic Bias
% R
espo
nses
Our results based on 25 subjects(Overall accuracy 93% on fillers)
Voiced “Dip” Unvoiced “Tip”
Time
Visual fixation stimulus (500ms)
Auditory stimulus
300ms delay
Visual probe
Stimulus with VOT cutback
Bad Items12 t You can come here by TRAIN21 t She joined a brownie TROOP sound?57 d She says her horoscope is DIRE sound68 d The jungle growth was quite DENSE
101 p Eat after the drinks are POURED116 p The man losing his job PLED awkward178 b He never paid his electric BILL201 k The officer searched for a CLUE202 k The door is about to CLOSE203 k Winter in Massachusetts is very COLD204 k You should invite her to COME205 k Needlepoint is my favorite new CRAFT206 k The raft floated down the CREEK sound207 k The pirate ship needs a CREW sound?208 k The bird was probably a CROW sound?209 k The little prince was just CROWNED
210 k Her hair has a natural CURL211 k He slice dthe apple to its CORE212 k There are 30 students in the CLASS213 k Our state fish is the COD214 k Fall evenings are very COOL215 k I would do it if I COULD216 k They lift the beams by CRANE219 k The mad man was totally CRAZED220 k He bent down into a CROUCH263 g Neptune was the Roman sea GOD sound
Top down effects Bottom up effects
Sound
Sound
Decision
VOT=61msVOT=17ms
VOT=28ms
Voiced “Dip” (BDG) Unvoiced “Tip” (PTK)
• A large number of stimuli were used.
• 150 word pairs with 350 distractor stimuli.
• No nonsense words or continuously repeated stimuli.
• Prevents memorization as well as participant confusion.
• Participants stay more task focused.
MeaningMeaning
Sound