poster for walt lab

1
50 µm b ) c ) Identification of Highly Catalytic Polymers Protocol Graduate Students Shazia Baig Trinh Dinh Pratyusha Mogalisetti Stephanie Schubert Soyoon Sarah Hwang Prarthana Khanna Payel Ghatak Nicolas Iverson Limor Cohen Post Doctoral Associates Dr. Barrett Duan Dr. Candice Etson Dr. Danlu Wu Dr. Stephanie Walter Dr. Mark Hartman Dr. Shudan Bian Dr. Bishnu Regmi Dr. Liangxia Xie Dr. Yael Simakov Group Members Principal Investigator Dr. David R. Walt University Professor & Robinson Professor of Chemistry & Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor Undergraduate Students Tabitha Amondi Peter Cavanagh Douglas Davis Derek DuPont Thomas Moody Kevin Ngan Alex Sakers Jason Shnipes Petar Todorov Bridget Yang Bruce Bausk Walt Laboratory: Synthetic Polymers as Catalysts for Difficult Reactions Results: Proof of Catalysis? a ) b ) c ) Light reflected down the fiber core Light refracted into the cladding material Fiber-optic arrays of 50,000 individual 4.5 m fibers are bundled into a 2 mm hexagonal array. This optical fiber schematic illustrates how light is guided through the core material via total internal reflection. The core material possesses a higher refractive index than the cladding material, so as long as the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle of the fiber, the light entering the core material can be internally reflected at the boundary between the two materials. Fiber Optic Bundles Peptide Catalysts: Innovation a) Effect of PEG Functionalization Step 1: Oligomer Synthesis (Gellman Lab) : Pool Screening, Mechanical Sealing (Walt Lab) 8 Image Fiber 50,000 wells (46 fL) 28,000 Oligomers per Well 4×10 9 oligomers (50,000 wells) *An appropriate low enzyme concentration ensures that the wells contain a maximum of only a single enzyme molecule while the rest are empty. Big Goal : Discover a given polymer or oligomer pool containing rare members with significant catalytic activity. What we need to do? Identify a reaction with rationally variable “degree of difficulty” Femtoliter-well array screening method Our Preliminary observations of those pools will give us a general idea about the length and residues of oligomers required to achieve high catalytic activity Better throughput: can Image 8 fibers More Reproducible Amide 10 -10 ~ 10 -11 sec -1 Phosphate ester 10 -20 ~ 10 -16 sec -1 Glycoside 10 -14 ~ 10 -15 sec -1 Transamidation/Hydrolysis of amide, phosphate ester or glycoside Advantages of Peptide Oligomers -Building blocks with inherent chirality and functional diversity -Easy to synthesize -High degree of stability Challenges -Difficult rational design -Few polymers with unnatural bones used for reactivity study -Very little effort to identify oligomeric catalysts with unnatural backbones Establish a reliable experimental protocol to identify rare highly active catalysts for fluorogenic versions of difficult reactions; any fluorogenic reaction can then be tested Deliver catalysts with unprecedented activity levels among non-biological systems. Provide new insight on fundamental requirements for achieving significant catalytic activity for "difficult" reactions Enable such studies to be conducted in many different laboratories Innovation PEG MW 700 PEG MW 2000 Mean (PercentageChange): 7.041 Standard Deviation: 7.506 Control Threshold Value = Mean(Percentagechange)+3*(Standard Deviation) = 29.559 Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 29.559 (# Wells: 18) Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 32.47 (# Wells: 13) Mean (PercentageChange): 5.44 Standard Deviation: 9.01 Control Threshold Value = Mean(Percentagechange)+3*(Standard Deviation) = 32.47 5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine Control Experiment (7 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57 Min) 5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine Control Experiment (3 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57min) Min) 5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine with 2.5 μM MM-153-A (4 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57 Min) Lys-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Lys (MM153 A) X = 1:1:1 Tyrosine/Histidine/Glutamic Diversity: 3^16 = 4.3 x 10 7 sequences 46fL×2.5 μM ×6.02×10 23 ×50000×4=1.38× 10 10 1.38×10 10 / 4.3 x 10 7 = 322 (~11 active polymers per fiber) (~42 active polymers per fiber, without PEG- Functionalization) 5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine with 2.5 μM MM-153-B (3 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57 Min) Lys-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Lys (MM153 B) X = 4:1:1 Tyrosine/Histidine/Glutamic Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 29.559 (# Wells: 16294) Diversity: 3^16 = 4.3 x 10 7 sequences 46fL×2.5 μM ×6.02×10 23 ×50000×3=1.03× 10 10 1.03×10 10 / 4.3 x 10 7 = 239 (~17 active polymers per fiber) (~93 active polymers per fiber, without PEG- Functionalization) Bulk measurement with respect to control: MM153B = 1.7 ± 0.2 Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 29.559 (# Wells: 15022) Bulk measurement with respect to control: MM153A = 1.3 ± 0.4

Upload: antonio-lobao

Post on 14-Apr-2017

25 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Poster for Walt Lab

50 µm

b)

c)

Identification of Highly Catalytic Polymers

Protocol

Graduate StudentsShazia BaigTrinh Dinh

Pratyusha MogalisettiStephanie SchubertSoyoon Sarah HwangPrarthana KhannaPayel GhatakNicolas IversonLimor Cohen

Post Doctoral Associates Dr. Barrett DuanDr. Candice EtsonDr. Danlu WuDr. Stephanie WalterDr. Mark Hartman Dr. Shudan BianDr. Bishnu RegmiDr. Liangxia XieDr. Yael Simakov

Group MembersPrincipal Investigator

Dr. David R. WaltUniversity Professor & Robinson Professor of Chemistry & Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor

Undergraduate StudentsTabitha AmondiPeter CavanaghDouglas DavisDerek DuPontThomas MoodyKevin NganAlex SakersJason ShnipesPetar TodorovBridget YangBruce Bausk

Walt Laboratory: Synthetic Polymers as Catalysts for Difficult Reactions

Results: Proof of Catalysis?

a)

b)

c)

Light reflected down the fiber core

Light refracted into the cladding material

Fiber-optic arrays of 50,000 individual 4.5 m fibers are bundled into a 2 mm hexagonal array.

This optical fiber schematic illustrates how light is guided through the core material via total internal reflection. The core material possesses a higher refractive index than the cladding material, so as long as the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle of the fiber, the light entering the core material can be internally reflected at the boundary between the two materials.

Fiber Optic Bundles

Peptide Catalysts: Innovation

a)

Effect of PEG Functionalization

Step 1: Oligomer Synthesis (Gellman Lab)

Step 2: Pool Screening, Mechanical Sealing (Walt Lab)

8 Image Fiber

50,000 wells (46 fL)

28,000 Oligomers per Well1.4×109 oligomers (50,000 wells)

*An appropriate low enzyme concentration ensures that the wells contain a maximum of only a single enzyme molecule while the rest are empty.

Big Goal: Discover a given polymer oroligomer pool containing rare members with significant catalytic activity.

What we need to do?

Identify a reaction with rationally variable “degree of difficulty”

Femtoliter-well array screening method

Our Preliminary observations of those pools will give us a general idea about the length and residues of oligomers required to achieve high catalytic activity

• Better throughput: can Image 8 fibers

• More Reproducible

Amide10-10 ~ 10-11 sec-1

Phosphate ester10-20 ~ 10-16 sec-1

Glycoside10-14 ~ 10-15 sec-1

Transamidation/Hydrolysis of amide, phosphate ester or glycoside

Advantages of Peptide Oligomers

-Building blocks with inherent chirality and functional diversity-Easy to synthesize-High degree of stability

Challenges

-Difficult rational design -Few polymers with unnatural bones used for reactivity study-Very little effort to identify oligomeric catalysts with unnatural backbones

• Establish a reliable experimental protocol to identify rare highly active catalysts for fluorogenic versions of difficult reactions; any fluorogenic reaction can then be tested

• Deliver catalysts with unprecedented activity levels among non-biological systems.

• Provide new insight on fundamental requirements for achieving significant catalytic activity for "difficult" reactions

• Enable such studies to be conducted in many different laboratories

Innovation

PEG MW 700

PEG MW 2000

Mean (PercentageChange): 7.041Standard Deviation: 7.506Control Threshold Value = Mean(Percentagechange)+3*(Standard Deviation) = 29.559

Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 29.559 (# Wells: 18)

Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 32.47 (# Wells: 13)

Mean (PercentageChange): 5.44Standard Deviation: 9.01Control Threshold Value = Mean(Percentagechange)+3*(Standard Deviation) = 32.47

5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine Control Experiment (7 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57 Min)

5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine Control Experiment (3 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57min)

Min)

5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine with 2.5 μM MM-153-A(4 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57 Min)Lys-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Lys (MM153 A) X = 1:1:1 Tyrosine/Histidine/Glutamic

Diversity:3^16 = 4.3 x 107 sequences46fL×2.5 μM ×6.02×1023×50000×4=1.38×1010

1.38×1010 / 4.3 x 107 = 322

(~11 active polymers per fiber)(~42 active polymers per fiber, without PEG-Functionalization)

5 μM Pro-Pro-Rhodamine with 2.5 μM MM-153-B(3 Fiber Experiments/PEG-functionalized Fiber/57 Min)

Lys-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Phe-XXXX-Lys(MM153 B) X = 4:1:1 Tyrosine/Histidine/Glutamic

Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 29.559 (# Wells: 16294)

Diversity:3^16 = 4.3 x 107 sequences46fL×2.5 μM ×6.02×1023×50000×3=1.03×1010

1.03×1010 / 4.3 x 107 = 239

(~17 active polymers per fiber)(~93 active polymers per fiber, without PEG-Functionalization)

Bulk measurement with respect to control:MM153B = 1.7 ± 0.2

Fluorescent Wells with Percentage Increase More than 29.559 (# Wells: 15022)

Bulk measurement with respect to control:MM153A = 1.3 ± 0.4