Done By: Murtadha ALAjmi 68691 Hussian ALAjmi 68710 Mazin Al-Maqrashi 68698Submitted to : Dr. Alaa Sadik

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The Comparative study :

“ Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face

Learning Environments ”

Study Title

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The Comparative study:

Comparing an online course with an equivalent course

taught in a traditional face-to-face format. Comparisons

included student ratings of instructor and course quality;

assessment of course interaction, structure, and support;

and learning outcomes such as course projects, grades,

and student self-assessment of their ability to perform

various ISD tasks.

Study Purpose

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The Comparative study :- What differences exist in satisfaction with the learning experience of

students enrolled in online versus face-to-face learning environments?

- What differences exist in student perceptions of student/instructor

interaction, course structure, and course support between students

enrolled in online versus face-to-face learning environments?

- What differences exist in the learning outcomes (i.e., perceived content

knowledge, quality of course projects, and final course grades) of

students enrolled in online versus face-to-face learning environments?

Study Questions

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The Comparative study:

- The university’s Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) was

used to obtain general student perceptions of the quality of their learning

experience.

- The Course Interaction, Structure, and Support (CISS) instrument which

is a hybrid instrument of:

The Distance and Open Learning Scale (DOLES) instrument was

used to assess student perceptions of their learning experience.

The Dimensions of Distance Education (DDE) instrument which

provides a further assessment of the learning environment.

Study Instrument

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The Comparative study:

More than one instrument was used to collect data.

Advantages

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Study Purpose The Comparative study:

Only tools for quantitative analysis were used without

using of any type of qualitative analysis tools.

Disadvantages

Disadvantages

Results

Advantages

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Study Purpose The Comparative study:

Student Satisfaction: On the student satisfaction indicators,

instructor quality and course quality, both groups provided

positive ratings, although the face-to-face group displayed more

positive views than the online group.

Perceptions of course interaction, structure & support: Overall,

both groups of students had positive perceptions, with the face-

to-face students having significantly more positive views for

interaction and support.

Results

Results

Advantages

Disadvantages

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The non-Comparative study :“ Evaluation of the development of metacognitive knowledge supported by the knowcat system “

Study Title

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The non-Comparative study :to examine the development of the metacognitiveknowledge of a group of higher education students who participated actively in an experiment based on a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning environment called KnowCat.

Study Purpose

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The non-Comparative study :

Firstly, how were students aware of their own and others’ learning processes developed when participating in the KnowCat educational environment?

Secondly, which KnowCat knowledge elements have more incidence in the students’ awareness of the development of specific learning processes?

Study Questions

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The non-Comparative study :

The target instrument in this study is interview. Eighteen university students participated in a 12-month learning project during which the KnowCat learning environment was used to support scaffolding process among equals during problem-solving tasks. After using KnowCat, the students were interviewed over their work in this shared workspace.

Study Instrument

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Advantages

Study Purpose The non-Comparative Study :

The researcher implemented both metacognitive

skills and metacognitive knowledge to measure the

criteria.

The researcher provided descriptive instances and explained the procedures obviously.

Advantages

Disadvantages

Results

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Study Purpose The non-Comparative Study :

Using only one instrument which is interview collect

data.

Qualitative analysis were applied without using of

any type of quantitative analysis tools.

Disadvantages

Disadvantages

Results

Advantages

Study Title

Study Questions

Study Instrument

Study Purpose The non-Comparative study :

the educational application of KnowCat can favour and improve the students’ metacognitive knowledge.

The content analysis of the students’ interviews revealed the existence of metacognitive knowledge regarding the learning processes that students develop while interacting with KnowCat knowledge elements.

Students showed high levels of consciousness about learning new strategies and about the conditional use of these strategies to solve specific tasks efficiently.

Results

Results

Advantages

Disadvantages

1- The Comparative Study:

http://www.editlib.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Reader.ViewFullText&paper_id=8371

2- The non-Comparative study :

http://www.iadis.net/dl/final_uploads/200818L020.pdf

References